Subject: RE: DNC Clips 5.13.2016
From: "Jefferson, Deshundra" <[email-masked]>
To: Regional Press <[email-masked]>
Cc: Pratt Wiley <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:33:59 -0700

Spoke with Pratt, and we’re not going to do anything on the Samantha Lachman piece BUT she definitely used our messaging from some of our recent press releases in her article.

Republicans frequently argue that the possibility of voter fraud necessitates cutting back early voting, eliminating same-day registration, instituting strict voter identification laws and opposing efforts to make voting more accessible. Recently, a congressman from Wisconsin and a former senator who now leads a prominent Republican think tank said voter-identification laws help Republicans win elections, because voter fraud is so widespread that it’s helping Democrats win elections.

From: Price, Jenna
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 7:40 AM
To: Price, Jenna
Subject: DNC Clips 5.13.2016

WEATHER: 72F, Cloudy

POTUS and the Administration

U.S. Directs Public Schools to Allow Transgender Access to Restrooms<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/us/politics/obama-administration-to-issue-decree-on-transgender-access-to-school-restrooms.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // JULIE DAVIS AND MATT APUZZO

The Obama administration is planning to issue a sweeping directive telling every public school district in the country to allow transgender students to use the bathrooms that match their gender identity. A letter to school districts will go out Friday, adding to a highly charged debate over transgender rights in the middle of the administration’s legal fight with North Carolina over the issue. The declaration — signed by Justice and Education department officials — will describe what schools should do to ensure that none of their students is discriminated against. It does not have the force of law, but it contains an implicit threat: Schools that do not abide by the Obama administration’s interpretation of the law could face lawsuits or a loss of federal aid.

Obama administration to instruct schools to accommodate transgender students<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-administration-to-instruct-schools-to-accommodate-transgender-students/2016/05/12/0ed1c50e-18ab-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_transgender-1025pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory>

WASHINGTON POST // JULIET EILPERIN

The Obama administration will issue guidance Friday instructing schools across the nation that they must provide transgender students access to facilities — including bathrooms and locker rooms — that match their chosen gender identity. The letter from two top administration officials — Catherine E. Lhamon, the assistant secretary of education for civil rights, and Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division — effectively puts state and local officials on notice that they could lose federal aid if they confine students to areas or teams based on the gender that matches their birth certificate. It comes just days after the Justice Department and the state of North Carolina filed dueling lawsuits over a new law requiring individuals in that state to use bathrooms based on the gender they were assigned at birth.

Judge Backs House Challenge to a Key Part of Health Law<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/us/politics/health-law-obama.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // CARL HULSE

The Republican-led House of Representatives won a significant victory over the Obama administration on Thursday when a Federal District Court judge in Washington ruled that the Department of Health and Human Services did not have the authority to spend billions of dollars on a key element of the new health care law. Judge Rosemary M. Collyer sided with the House in its challenge to the administration’s funding of a program to help as many as seven million lower-income people pay deductibles, co-payments and other out-of-pocket expenses under the law. Congress never provided explicit authority for the spending, she ruled. “Such an appropriation cannot be inferred,” the judge said in her opinion. She blocked further spending under the program but said that order would be suspended pending an appeal by the Obama administration. No immediate disruption in the program was anticipated.

Judge rules for House GOP in ObamaCare suit<http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/279695-judge-rules-for-house-gop-in-obamacare-suit>

THE HILL // PETER SULLIVAN

A federal judge on Thursday ruled in favor of House Republicans in their lawsuit against the Obama administration over ObamaCare. In a major ruling, Judge Rosemary Collyer, an appointee of President George W. Bush, said the administration does not have the power to spend money on "cost sharing reduction payments" to insurers without an appropriation from Congress. Collyer's decision doesn't immediately go into effect, however, so that the administration can appeal it. “This is an historic win for the Constitution and the American people," Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said in a statement. "The court ruled that the administration overreached by spending taxpayer money without approval from the people's representatives." At issue are billions of dollars paid to insurance companies participating in ObamaCare so they can reduce customers' out-of-pocket costs, such as deductibles for low-income people. The House GOP argued that the administration was unconstitutionally spending money on these payments without Congress's approval.

Obama’s Health Law Wrongly Repaying Funds to Insurers, Judge Says<http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-judge-rules-for-house-republicans-in-health-care-case-1463074018>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // BRENT KENDALL, STEPHANIE ARMOUR and ANNA WILDE MATHEWS

A federal judge on Thursday dealt a blow to the Obama administration’s health law, ruling the government improperly reimburses insurers to cover discounts to low-income consumers. The decision by U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer introduces significant new legal uncertainty for the law, President Barack Obama’s signature legislative achievement, just before the heat of the 2016 election season. The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by House Republicans challenging the law’s implementation. It blocked certain government payments to insurance companies, a key part of the law’s attempts to reduce out-of-pocket insurance costs for very low-income individuals that the Congressional Budget Office has estimated will amount to about $130 billion from 2017 through 2026.

Judge strikes down Obama health law insurance subsidy in victory for House GOP<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/judge-strikes-down-obama-health-law-insurance-subsidy-in-victory-for-house-gop/2016/05/12/67a8af78-1863-11e6-9e16-2e5a123aac62_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // SPENCER S. HSU, GREG JAFFE, AND AND LENA H. SUN

A federal judge struck down a portion of President Obama’s signature Affordable Care Act health law Thursday, ruling that Obama exceeded his authority in unilaterally funding a provision that sent billions of dollars in subsidies to health insurers. In a 38-page decision, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer of the District put her ruling on hold pending the administration’s certain appeal. Her decision sided with the U.S. House of Representatives, which brought the lawsuit challenging more than $175 billion of spending after a party-line vote by House Republicans in July 2014. The House GOP argued that the administration’s decision to subsidize deductibles, co-pays and other “cost-sharing” measures was unconstitutional because Congress rejected an administration request for funding in 2014. Obama officials said they withdrew the request and spent the money, arguing that the subsidies were covered by an earlier, permanent appropriation.

Cuba and U.S. officials to meet next week to deepen détente<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-cuba-us-idUSKCN0Y32HU?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reuters+Politics+News%29>

REUTERS // SARAH MARSH

Cuba and the United States will meet next week for a third round of talks on improving relations, Havana said on Thursday, adding that the two former Cold War foes were not yet negotiating their multibillion-dollar claims against one another. A bilateral commission will meet next Monday in the Cuban capital to evaluate the progress made in putting their decades-old conflict behind them, and to identify new areas of cooperation, said Gustavo Machin, the deputy director for U.S. affairs in the Cuban foreign ministry. "We will set the agenda for the rest for the year," Machin told a news conference. "We are not yet negotiating the topic of claims even if there is a recognition on both sides that these exist."

White House Not Losing Sleep Over Trump-GOP Meetings<https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/white-house-reacts-to-trump-gop-meetings-with-some-amusement>

ROLL CALL // JOHN BENNETT

The White House reacted to presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s meetings with GOP congressional leaders with “some amusement.” “I don’t know anyone here who’s going to lose sleep over this meeting,” Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters, referring to the White House. White House officials find it telling that although Speaker Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin spent ample time after taking the gavel late last year getting buy-in from his members on his policy agenda, he seems focused on convincing another GOP leader, Trump, to embrace it, Earnest said.

Don't Expect Controversial Obama Aide to Testify<https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/dont-expect-controversial-obama-aide-to-testify>

ROLL CALL // JOHN BENNETT

Expect Ben Rhodes’ chair in a House hearing room to be empty next Tuesday when a Republican-run committee examines the Obama administration’s nuclear deal with Iran. Rhodes, President Barack Obama’s deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, caused a ruckus in Washington when a New York Times Magazine article described him as crafting a faux narrative about the Iran deal. The piece describes Rhodes’ role as leading a messaging effort to describe the accord as a way to push Iranian moderates into power. “I mean, I’d prefer a sober, reasoned public debate, after which members of Congress reflect and take a vote,” Rhodes told the magazine. “But that’s impossible.”

EPA finalizes stronger methane emission rules<http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/279671-epa-finalizes-stronger-new-methane-leak-rules>

THE HILL // DAVID HENRY

The Obama administration on Thursday finalized a new rule designed to cut methane emissions from the oil and natural gas sector, pushing a stronger standard than one proposed last summer. The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) methane rule sets standards for methane leaks along the natural gas production line, including drilling and pumping, at new or modified wells. The agency also said it is kicking off work on a rule for methane leaks at existing wells, but acknowledged that won’t come until after Obama has left office. Thursday’s rule is the EPA’s first step toward an administration goal of cutting U.S. methane pollution by 40 percent to 45 percent from 2012 levels by 2025. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, with more than 25 times the global warming potential than carbon dioxide. It’s the primary component of natural gas, and drillers warn regulations on methane will hurt an American natural gas boom that has upended the country’s energy sector.

Has the Obama administration learned anything from last deportation raids?<http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/has-the-obama-administration-learned-anything-last-deportation-raids>

MSNBC // AMANDA SAKUMA

The Obama administration stumbled and took a lot of heat the last time that it tried to round up and deport immigrant women and children. Now it’s trying again. Immigration officials are preparing for a 30-day deportation sweep, specifically targeting immigrant families and unaccompanied minors who recently fled from violence in the Northern Triangle of Central America. The fresh round of raids, first reported Thursday by Reuters, marks the first series of mass deportations since the Obama administration carried out a similar two-day sweep in January. Immigration officials in that operation rounded up 121 immigrants, primarily women and children, in the raids before taking them to a detention center in Texas. Problems emerged almost immediately. A number of families saw their deportations called off thanks to a last-minute reprieve from the Board of Immigration Review.

Trump’s U.S.-Mexico border wall and other ideas are publicly off-limits for Obama officials<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/05/13/trumps-border-wall-plan-seems-to-be-off-limits-for-top-obama-officials/>

WASHINGTON POST // LISA REIN

Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson has assailed Donald Trump’s vow to build a massive wall along the U.S.-Mexico frontier as “overheated, oversimplistic rhetoric” and a bad idea. He’s called Trump’s controversial remarks toward Muslims — and similar words from Ted Cruz before the Texas senator’s exit from the presidential race — “beyond the pale” and said anti-Muslim rhetoric burns bridges instead of building them. But now, on the subject of the presumptive GOP nominee for president and how the agency tasked with border security would actually build a wall to keep out illegal Mexican migrants, Johnson is more or less .. mum. “I’ve talked in public settings about the wall that exists, now, on the border,” he said in an interview in his office this week. “I’ve said that we’ve got fences in places where it makes sense to build fences.” Johnson pulled from his desk drawer a print-out of a PowerPoint presentation on the existing fence that now stretches about 650 miles along the Southwest border (the entire border is almost 2,000 miles). And he described how the fence is only one feature of a broader border strategy that includes expanded sensors, drones and other technology. But the homeland chief did not want to talk about Trump or his controversial immigration plan.

Democrats

Senate sets votes on competing Zika funding plans<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-zika-congress-options-idUSKCN0Y32GY?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reuters+Politics+News%29>

REUTERS // RICHARD COWAN

Three competing plans for battling a potential Zika virus outbreak in the United States were presented on the floor of the U.S. Senate on Thursday, as lawmakers tried to break an impasse pitting President Barack Obama against congressional Republicans. The first test votes on the measures, which would provide at least $1.1 billion in new funds to deal with the spreading virus, were expected on Tuesday. In February, Obama urged Congress to quickly approve $1.9 billion in emergency funds to deal with prevention and treatment of Zika virus, which the World Health Organization warns is spreading rapidly in the Americas. The disease, transmitted by mosquitoes, has been linked to the birth defect microcephaly and other severe brain abnormalities. It also is suspected of causing a rare neurological disorder, Guillain-Barre syndrome, that can result in paralysis.

Democratic Lawmakers Say Fed Should Increase Its Diversity<http://www.wsj.com/articles/democratic-legislators-criticize-fed-over-leadership-diversity-1463068801>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // MICHAEL DERBY

The predominantly white male composition of Federal Reserve leadership is facing criticism from Democratic elected officials who believe the institution doesn’t adequately reflect the demographics of the nation it is meant to serve. The legislators said in a letter to Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen on Thursday that central bank leaders also are drawn too frequently from business and financial backgrounds. The letter to Ms. Yellen received support from the leading Democratic candidate for the White House, Hillary Clinton. Eleven senators and 116 members of the House of Representatives signed the letter, which was organized by Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Rep. John Conyers Jr. of Michigan. No Republicans participated, although they were given the opportunity to do so.

Elizabeth Warren Is On An Anti-Trump Tweetstorm. The Clinton Campaign Has Noticed.<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/elizabeth-warren-donald-trump-vice-president_us_5734e8efe4b060aa7819c184?utm_hp_ref=politics>

HUFFINGTON POST // SAM STEIN

Twice this past week, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has unleashed a seemingly unprompted tweetstorm on Donald Trump, taking shots at the presumptive Republican presidential nominee for being sexist, a scam artist, “reckless” and “embarrassing.” Dripping with disdain, the 140-character asides got under Trump’s skin (admittedly, not the hardest of feats). He accused her of “tweeting violently” and bestowed on the senator one of his trademark churlish nicknames. “Goofy Elizabeth Warren,” he replied in tweets of his own. The more important reaction came not from Trump, however, but from Hillary Clinton‘s campaign. Multiple sources close to the former secretary of state say that her aides took note of the senator’s ability to rile the real estate tycoon. And they recognize the value of such dart throwing from, say, someone filling out a presidential ticket.

Senate reaches deal on Zika funding, will vote Tuesday<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/05/12/senate-reaches-deal-on-zika-funding-will-vote-tuesday/>

WASHINGTON POST // KELSEY SNELL

The Senate on Thursday reached a bipartisan deal that would provide $1.1 billion in funding to fight the Zika virus, breaking a months-long standoff over how much spending is needed to address the growing public health threat. The funding package was introduced as an amendment to a spending bill that is expected to be considered next week. Senators will also have the opportunity to vote on an option that would fully fund White House’s $1.9 billion request and a separate GOP-backed proposal that would use $1.2 billion in cuts to an Affordable Care Act program to offset the cost of $1.1 billion in Zika spending. The compromise option, sponsored by Sens. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) and Patty Murray (D-Wash.), is expected to get widespread support from Democrats and Republicans, despite falling short of the White House request. The Senate is scheduled to vote on all three amendments Tuesday.

Senate to Consider 3 Proposals to Finance Fight Against Zika<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/us/politics/senate-to-consider-3-proposals-to-finance-fight-against-zika.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // DAVID HERSZENHORN

The Senate next week will vote on three proposals for financing to combat the mosquito-borne Zika virus, which causes birth defects and which public health officials say will soon pose a major threat in the southern United States. Democrats and Republicans have been deadlocked over a request by the White House for $1.9 billion in emergency financing to combat the virus, with the Obama administration sharply criticizing Republican Congressional leaders for stalling and the lawmakers demanding that the White House better explain how it would use the money. Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, on Thursday initiated procedural steps to take votes on a proposal that would grant the Obama administration’s full $1.9 billion request as well as two other measures that would provide $1.1 billion.

Some Big Democratic Party Backers to Pool Spending to Support Hillary Clinton and Others<http://www.wsj.com/articles/some-big-democratic-party-backers-to-pool-spending-1463083688>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // BRODY MULLINS AND MELANIE TROTTMAN

Some of the biggest political supporters of the Democratic Party have agreed to pool their money in a super PAC targeting $50 million in funding to pay for door-to-door campaigning in support of Hillary Clinton and other Democrats running in the fall elections. The AFL-CIO labor federation and unions including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, American Federation of Teachers and National Education Association agreed to join forces to fund the operation along with Democratic megadonor Tom Steyer. Mr. Steyer and the groups pledged to contribute at least $5 million each to kick off the effort. Other Democratic donors and unions have been asked to contribute up to $1 million each to become a part of the new campaign entity, called For Our Future PAC.

Battleground State Registration Gives Democrats Early Edge<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-13/battleground-state-registration-gives-democrats-early-edge>

BLOOMBERG // JOHN MCCORMICK

Democrats hold a registration advantage over Republicans in four of seven battleground states likely to play a central role in the presidential election, even as Republicans and independents have made gains.  The party that now controls the White House is ahead in registered voters in Florida, Nevada, North Carolina and Pennsylvania, while Republicans hold the lead in Colorado, Iowa and New Hampshire, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Politics. Three other likely battlegrounds -- Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin -- don’t register voters by party. Democratic President Barack Obama won nine of those 10 states in 2012, with the exception being a roughly 2-percentage-point loss in North Carolina. As an expected general election contest between Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton comes into focus, the states included in the analysis where Democrats hold a registration advantage have a combined 70 electoral votes, while the ones where Republicans have an edge account for 19. None of that suggests the Democrats or Republicans will win any of those states and being registered with a given party doesn't always translate to voting for that party's presidential candidate. Trump, for example, has also argued that he will have a strong crossover appeal and will be able to win over independents and some Democrats, while Clinton has been appealing to moderate Republicans who dislike the billionaire real-estate developer.

Democrats Relish GOP Colleagues’ Discomfort With Trump<http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-12/democrats-relish-gop-colleagues-discomfort-with-trump>

U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT // GABRIELLE LEVY

Congressional Democrats were gleeful Thursday as their Republican colleagues welcomed Donald Trump to Washington and prepared to embrace him – some through clenched teeth – as their party's presidential nominee. The billionaire businessman and former reality television star's proposals and rhetoric on the campaign trail have made him the most unpopular major party nominee in modern times, and Democrats, hoping to executing a landslide victory that would give them power in at least one house of Congress, have been salivating over the opportunity to tie their GOP colleagues to Trump this November. After huddling with Trump at Republican National Committee headquarters Thursday, House Speaker Paul Ryan appeared closer to dropping his skepticism about his party's de facto leader, calling for party unity and expressing confidence they would be able to work out "our few differences." But Democrats were eager to erase any distance between Trump and their GOP colleagues. While mainstream Republicans may not approve of Trump's bombastic style, Democrats argued, the positions of the party and its soon-to-be nominee are more in sync than they care to admit.

Cuomo Campaign’s Role in Scrutinized Senate Races Comes Into Focus<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/nyregion/cuomo-campaigns-role-in-scrutinized-senate-races-comes-into-focus.html>

NEW YORK TIMES // WILLIAM K. RASHBAUM

It began with great fanfare in the spring of 2014. Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and Mayor Bill de Blasio joined forces to help elect a Democratic majority in the New York State Senate, a goal to which Mr. Cuomo had paid lip service but had done little to achieve. It did not, however, end well. The Republicans prevailed on Election Day, weeks after the unusual alliance between the governor and the mayor ruptured amid accusations that Mr. Cuomo was sabotaging the effort. The Democratic Senate candidates were not the only losers: Eighteen months later, Mr. de Blasio and several aides, along with a number of consultants and labor union operatives, find themselves caught up in a criminal investigation focused on how they directed money into some of the contested races. The inquiry focuses squarely on the de Blasio team’s effort to use county committees to deliver more money than would be allowed through contribution caps that apply to individual candidates. But the Cuomo campaign was nonetheless involved in the overall effort to help the Democrats retake the Senate, at least behind the scenes, according to documents and correspondence reviewed by The New York Times, and to people briefed on the effort.

Republicans

Senate panel approves $602B defense bill<http://thehill.com/policy/defense/279773-senate-panel-approves-602b-defense-bill>

THE HILL // REBECCA KHEEL

The Senate Armed Services Committee passed its $602 billion annual defense policy bill Thursday, setting itself up for a clash with the House on several points. The committee passed the bill 23-3 in a closed session. On Thursday evening, the committee released a summary confirming what Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.) has hinted at in recent weeks - that his bill would deviate from that of the House. McCain touted various reforms to Pentagon leadership and buying programs in the Senate’s 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). “This is a reform bill,” McCain said in written statement. “The NDAA contains the most sweeping reforms of the organization of the Department of Defense in a generation.” But the two versions differ by $8 billion in overall spending – and by much more on how to allocate funds. The Senate version of the NDAA would authorize $602 billion for defense spending. That would be split between $543 billion for the base budget and $59 billion for a war fund known as the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) fund.

House GOP budget still dead in the water<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/house-gop-budget-votes-223143>

POLITICO // RACHAEL BADE, BEN WEYL, AND MATTHEW NUSSBAUM

House Republicans still don’t have the votes to pass a budget and GOP leaders are trying to figure out their next move. House Majority Whip Steve Scalise’s (R-La.) team did a whip check on Thursday. While the check wasn't completed, it was clear that Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and other top Republicans didn’t have the votes to move a budget through, according to multiple leadership sources. There is now a possibility that Ryan and House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) will start moving spending bills to the floor next week without passing a budget first — a decision that could prove embarrassing for a former Budget Chairman like Ryan. After May 15, the House may act on appropriations bills without passing a budget, although one GOP insider said leaders are also considering passing the blueprint after they begin work on individual appropriations bills.

Congress subcommittee grills U.S. banks regulator about data breaches<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-fdic-idUSKCN0Y32G1?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reuters+Politics+News%29>

REUTERS // LISA LAMBERT

Members of Congress on Thursday grilled the main U.S. banking regulator about a recent raft of data breaches, highlighting two incidents where workers downloaded more than 10,000 sensitive and private records onto portable storage devices before leaving the agency's employ. After the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp uncovered those two breaches, it conducted a review and found five other instances when employees improperly stored and took personal information for tens of thousands of individuals, according to Representative Barry Loudermilk, a Republican who chairs a House of Representatives subcommittee on oversight and technology. Altogether, more than 160,000 people were affected, Loudermilk said at a hearing covering the breaches. "To date, FDIC has failed to notify any of those individuals that their private information may have been compromised," he added.

Puerto Rico either gets legislative fix or humanitarian aid: Congressman<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-puertorico-debt-idUSKCN0Y32LW?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reuters+Politics+News%29>

REUTERS // DANIEL BASES

Puerto Rico's debt crisis, if left unaddressed by the U.S. Congress where legislation has stalled in the House Natural Resources Committee, will result in the need to pay for a humanitarian aid package, Congressman Raul Grijalva said on Thursday. Grijalva, the ranking Democrat on the HNRC from Arizona, said in a teleconference with reporters that it is an "either/or" situation as Puerto Rico faces $70 billion in debt it cannot pay off and a growing humanitarian crisis because it cannot afford maintaining basic social services. "Either we begin this process, stabilize, create some carve out opportunities for essential services and/or wait for the crisis to get worse and then have to respond with humanitarian relief," Grijalva said, adding that a new draft of the bill had not been made available as of Thursday morning. Grijalva visited Puerto Rico this week and met with the island's leadership and toured its main medical facilities. He said austerity alone is not going to stay the situation of degraded conditions for health, nutrition and education.

Senator Rand Paul to back bill blocking FBI hacking expansion<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cyber-warrants-idUSKCN0Y32YC?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reuters+Politics+News%29>

REUTERS // DUSTIN VOLZ

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul plans to become the first Republican co-sponsor of legislation to block a pending judicial rule change that would let U.S. judges issue search warrants for remote access to computers located in any jurisdiction, his office told Reuters on Thursday. The bill is expected to be introduced next week. Backing from Paul, a former Republican candidate for president with libertarian leanings, lends bipartisan support to an effort to undo a little-noticed modification to a text governing procedural rules for the U.S. court system that civil liberties groups warn would drastically expand the FBI’s hacking authority. So far, that cause has largely been championed solely by Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat and digital privacy advocate. He has vowed to work to stop the rule change on grounds it would allow the government to use one warrant to access and search thousands or millions of computers at once, potentially implicating those suspected of no wrongdoing. Magistrate judges can normally only order searches within the jurisdiction of their court, which is typically limited to a few counties.

Rubio enlists James Baker to knock Trump<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/marco-rubio-james-baker-donald-trump-223142>

POLITICO // NAHAL TOOSI

Marco Rubio’s latest shot at Donald Trump came with an assist from James Baker. The Republican Florida senator, who abandoned the presidential race earlier this year after repeated drubbings by Trump, asked the revered GOP elder statesman on Thursday what he thought of suggestions by “some people” that more countries should have nuclear weapons. “The more countries that acquire nuclear weapons, the more instability there is going to be in the world,” replied Baker, a former secretary of state, during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing. Trump has said he’s open to the idea of Japan, South Korea and even Saudi Arabia having their own nuclear defenses, instead of relying on America’s security umbrella.

Ben Carson Is Trying to Persuade Other Former Rivals to Endorse Donald Trump<http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/05/12/ben-carson-is-trying-to-persuade-other-former-rivals-to-endorse-donald-trump/?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // MAGGIE HABERMAN AND TRIP GABRIEL

Ben Carson, one of the earliest former rivals to endorse Donald J. Trump, has a new role, according to a confidant: emissary from Mr. Trump to the remaining holdouts from the Republican primary field. The confidant, Armstrong Williams, said on Thursday that Mr. Carson had been placing calls and “reaching out to everyone,” and planned to make the case that despite Mr. Trump’s insults in the primary race, the party needs to come together. The outreach would include Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush, all of whom were frequent targets of insults from Mr. Trump during the primary campaigns.

'Never (Again) Trump' sets sights on 2020<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/republican-primary-rules-donald-trump-223136>

POLITICO // KYLE CHENEY

Conservatives, still reeling over the looming nomination of Donald Trump, are pushing new Republican primary rules that might have prevented the mogul’s victory in the first place: shutting out independents and Democrats from helping to pick the GOP nominee. Trump romped in “open primaries” where non-Republicans voted by the thousands and may have influenced the outcome — especially in early states that set the tone of the entire race. Trump’s most successful rival, Ted Cruz, thrived in states with closed primaries where only Republicans were permitted to participate. Now, Cruz’s allies — hundreds of supportive convention delegates that he helped elect — hope to use the national convention in Cleveland to shove states toward closing their open primaries. And if they’re successful, it will not only go a long way toward warding off a Trump-like candidacy, it will tilt the primary toward conservative candidates in 2020 and beyond.

Maybe Republicans Should Be More Concerned About Election Fraud Than Voter Fraud<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/colorado-senate-primary_us_5734f0e8e4b060aa7819c8b2>

HUFFINGTON POST // SAMANTHA LACHMAN

The Republican primary to determine who will challenge Colorado’s Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet this fall has been consumed by allegations that one candidate got onto the ballot with forged signatures. The candidate battling the forgery accusations is Jon Keyser, an attorney and former state representative who was once seen as the front-runner in the Senate race and who has generated interest from some of the country’s wealthiest donors. He initially failed to qualify for the June 28 primary because the Colorado Secretary of State’s office couldn’t confirm the voter registration of one of his petition-collectors. Keyser’s campaign later won a court order putting him on the ballot. An investigation into Keyser’s signature-collecting by Denver7’s Marshall Zellinger suggests that at least 10 signatures that helped Keyser qualify to be on the ballot were forged. The video in Zellinger’s story is worth watching; voters who supposedly signed Keyser’s petitions say they didn’t sign them, and their handwriting styles are obviously different from their names on the petitions.

House Republicans warn D.C. not to assert budget independence<https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/house-republicans-warn-dc-not-to-assert-budget-independence/2016/05/12/9dedb720-184c-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // AARON C. DAVIS

A key House Republican warned Thursday that city employees could face prosecution if the D.C. Council went ahead with plans to spend local tax dollars without congressional approval. The threat, made during a two-hour hearing called by Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), chairman of the House subcommittee with oversight of the District, raises the stakes in the city’s renewed attempt to win autonomy from Congress. Meadows said that if the D.C. Council tried to implement a budget without the consent of Congress, it would be flouting the federal government’s “supreme authority” over the nation’s capital and possibly subject D.C. employees to federal prosecution. The warning served as a reality check for city leaders, who had been buoyed the day before when Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton made clear that she supports full statehood for the nation’s capital.

Boehner: Biden Could Step in if Email Scandal Forces Clinton Out<https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/boehner-clinton-drop-clear-way-biden>

ROLL CALL // JOHN BENNETT

Out with Hillary Clinton. In with Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. At least that’s what former House Speaker John A. Boehner thinks could happen should federal prosecutors opt to slap criminal charges on the former secretary of state over her use of a private email server while in that position. During a speaking engagement at a conference in Las Vegas, the now-retired Ohio Republican said he “would not be surprised at all” if Clinton “has to withdraw” from the presidential race if she faces charges, according to media reports. Boehner believes Biden “parachutes in” to take on presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump.

Ted Cruz Blames Fox News For Donald Trump’s Rise<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ted-cruz-donald-trump-fox-news_us_57351e84e4b060aa7819eb6f>

HUFFINGTON POST // MARINA FANG

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Thursday suggested Fox News had a role to play in facilitating presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump’s success and warned that it “will bear that responsibility going forward.” The former presidential candidate was asked on a conservative radio show in Houston whether he felt he was treated unfairly by Fox News, after he slammed the network’s executives earlier this month for turning it “into the Donald Trump network, 24/7.” “Well, listen, there’s time for recriminations. Everyone who was responsible for the rise of Donald Trump, they will bear that responsibility going forward,” he said.  “But there were more than a few players who played a disproportionate role in that rise,” he added, refusing to pin the blame solely on the cable news network. Before he dropped out of the GOP presidential race last week, clearing the way for Trump to become the presumptive nominee, the Texas senator suggested that executives at Fox News gave Trump wall-to-wall coverage to support his candidacy. “There is a broader dynamic at work, which is network executives have made a decision to get behind Donald Trump. Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes at Fox News have turned Fox News into the Donald Trump network, 24/7,” Cruz said at a press conference on the eve of the Indiana primary.

Republicans should close the ‘carried interest loophole’<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/republicans-should-close-the-carried-interest-loophole/2016/05/12/19d5fb9c-187d-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // CATHERINE RAMPELL

Donald Trump argues that Washington is captured by special interests, especially Wall Street. Trump argues that Washington politicians don’t know how to make deals, including with each other. Trump argues that a weak Republican establishment has let a Democratic president steamroll it with executive actions. I have a humble suggestion for how the political establishment — particularly the Republican political establishment — can kill all three of these allegations with one stone. Congress should close the “carried interest loophole.” This refers to a quirk in the tax code that allows a small, mostly mega-rich segment of the population to pay much lower tax rates on the fruits of their labor than everyone else. Managers at certain kinds of investment funds — such as private equity and venture capital funds — receive a share of the profits earned on their clients’ investments in exchange for the service of managing those investments. This performance fee is called “carried interest.” Under current practices, these managers report this carried interest as long-term capital gains, which are taxed at 20 percent. That’s about half the tax rate these managers would pay if carried interest were treated as ordinary labor income and taxed at the top marginal rate.

Health Care Ruling Gives John Boehner at Least Some Temporary Vindication<http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/05/13/health-care-ruling-gives-john-boehner-at-least-some-temporary-vindication/?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // CARL HULSE

The Obama administration and its allies are confident that Thursday’s federal court ruling, gutting an important part of the new health care law, will be overturned on appeal. But Republicans were not worrying about that for the moment. They were too busy celebrating the decision. After years of complaints that the Obama White House was flagrantly exceeding its executive authority on a range of issues, a federal district court judge in Washington, Rosemary W. Collyer, agreed with Republicans on the Affordable Care Act, finding that Congress had not funded a $130 billion program providing subsides to insurance companies. “This is a historic win for the Constitution and the American people,” Speaker Paul D. Ryan said in a typical reaction. “The executive branch is being held accountable to We the People.” The victory was particularly sweet for former Speaker John A. Boehner, but it may have also been bittersweet. The suit was the brainchild of Mr. Boehner and members of his staff, who initiated it as a way to challenge the new health care law. They recognized that congressional Republicans were never going to be successful in repealing the health care law with Mr. Obama in the White House (i.e., the failed shutdown in 2013) and looked for a more fruitful way to undermine it.

2016 Democrats

Clinton abandoned secure line to use home phone, new email shows<http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/279764-email-clinton-abandoned-secure-line-to-use-home-phone>

THE HILL // JULIAN HATTEM

New emails released by a conservative watchdog group on Thursday appear to show former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton directing a top aide to call her via an unsecured phone line when technical troubles prevented a secure phone conversation. “I give up. Call me on my home #,” Clinton told then-chief of staff Cheryl Mills in a February 2009 email, after more than an hour of trouble trying to communicate via a secure line. “I just spoke to ops and called you reg line - we have to wait until we see each other b/c [the] technology is not working,” Mills said in another email sent at almost exactly the same time. “Pls try again,” responded Clinton, a few moments later.

Clinton emails: State evolves on when diplomacy is classified<http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/05/hillary-clinton-emails-state-department-diplomatic-exchanges-223140>

POLITICO // JOSH GERSTEIN

The type of diplomatic information that accounts for about 90 percent of the messages now deemed classified in former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's email account is "routinely" and properly circulated in unclassified channels, the State Department said in a letter sent to the Senate earlier this month. However, State's stance appears to be one the diplomatic agency rejected in another flap over classified information rules more than a decade ago. In the present controversy, critics have charged that Clinton violated State Department rules and may have broken the law by sending and receiving so-called foreign government information on her personal email account which resided on a private email server at her home in Chappaqua, New York. But the May 2 letter from State Department legislative liaison Julia Frifield says such information isn't automatically considered classified. She adds that the day-to-day work of diplomats often requires handling such data via ordinary computer and phone systems and discussing it in nonsecure facilities.

Clinton Charity Aided Clinton Friends<http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-charity-aided-clinton-friends-1463086383>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // JAMES GRIMALDI

The Clinton Global Initiative, which arranges donations to help solve the world’s problems, set up a financial commitment that benefited a for-profit company part-owned by people with ties to the Clintons, including a current and a former Democratic official and a close friend of former President Bill Clinton. The $2 million commitment was placed on the agenda for a September 2010 conference of the Clinton Global Initiative at Mr. Clinton’s urging, according to a document from the period and people familiar with the matter. Mr. Clinton also personally endorsed the company, Energy Pioneer Solutions Inc., to then-Energy Secretary Steven Chu for a federal grant that year, said people with knowledge of the endorsement.

Hillary Clinton, no fan of 'Bernie Bros,' could use their energy vs. Trump<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/05/12/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-social-media-supporters/84284322/>

USA TODAY // RICK HAMPTON

They’re the unsanctioned shock troops of Bernie Sanders’ vaunted online army, digital rogues who've plagued Hillary Clinton’s presidential bid and embarrassed Sanders' campaign. “Bernie Bros’’ are the frequently misogynist and occasionally obscene Internet denizens who in posts and tweets have relentlessly derided Clinton (“Shillary’’) as too old, too compromised and/or too much of a card-carrying female to be president. Her supporters claim to have been bullied and harassed (“their vaginas are making terrible choices,” read one online comment from a Sanders supporter on a photo of Clinton and New Hampshire Sen. Jeanne Shaheen) for expressing themselves on Facebook, Twitter and other social media platforms.

Bernie Sanders Supporters Propose ‘Mobilizing Voters’ to Beat Donald Trump<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/us/politics/sanders-supporters-propose-mobilizing-voters-to-defeat-trump.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // YAMICHE ALCINDOR

A group of Bernie Sanders supporters who have worked or volunteered for his campaign have come up with a draft proposal calling for the Vermont senator to suspend his presidential bid after the June 7 California primary, eventually concede to Hillary Clinton and build an independent organization aimed at defeating Donald J. Trump. The three-page document addresses a question now facing Mr. Sanders’s most ardent supporters: how to harness the energy of a movement now that his presidential bid appears to be bowing to the reality that Mrs. Clinton will capture the Democratic nomination. The document suggests building “an organization, completely independent of the Clinton campaign,” to defeat Mr. Trump before focusing on other goals after the November election. About a dozen current and former Sanders staff members and volunteers have been collaborating on the draft proposal, which was obtained by The New York Times and first reported by Politico.

How Hillary Clinton Will Fight Donald Trump’s Unpredictability<http://time.com/4328519/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-unpredictable/>

TIME // ZEKE J. MILLER AND PHILIP ELLIOT

Donald Trump lurches in unexpected but effective ways. As a businessman, his unpredictability left rivals scratching their heads, and checking their wallets. After 11 months of mounting campaign-trail success in the face of more than $100 million in negative advertising, a hostile GOP Establishment and a skeptical media, those same tactics have Hillary Clinton’s supporters wondering what, exactly, can work against his kind of political insurgency. Now some opponents in both parties have concluded that Trump represents a kind of political asymmetric threat: less equipped, unpredictable and remarkably resilient. And as others have learned in the worlds of business, technology and national security, it takes a different kind of strategy to defeat that kind of unpredictable disrupter. “There is definitely an asymmetric political battle here,” says Tim Miller, Jeb Bush’s former communications director and an adviser to the #NeverTrump super PAC Our Principles Project. “He’s not playing by the same rules and it’s limiting.” To be sure, Trump has provided Clinton with a bounty of potential attacks: his statements about Mexican immigrants, his comments about women and his routine shifts on policy will all be fodder in the months to come. But Trump’s opponents in the Republican primary were unable to make headway with similar material.

Clinton, Sanders reaffirm opposition to Obama immigration raids<http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/12/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-obama-immigration-raids/index.html>

CNN // DAN MERICA

Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders on Thursday reaffirmed their opposition to Department of Homeland Security raids on Central American families in the United States, further breaking with President Barack Obama's administration on the issue. Reuters reported on Thursday that the Obama administration plans to carry out a series of large scale raids in May and June "to deport hundreds of Central American mothers and children found to have entered the country illegally." Clinton said in a statement that she is "against large scale raids that tear families apart and sow fear in communities," a position she first took in January. "I am concerned about recent news reports, and believe we should not be taking kids and families from their homes in the middle of the night," she said. "Large scale raids are not productive and do not reflect who we are as a country." When Central American children and families began amassing at the U.S. border with Mexico seeking asylum in 2014, Clinton called for them to be deported back to their home countries. She stood by that position last August but said immigrants shouldn't be kept in migrant camps indefinitely, suggesting that "particularly the women and children" should be moved out and opening the door to keeping some of them within the United States.

Sanders crashes into Democratic Party wall<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/bernie-sanders-dnc-rules-committee-222978>

POLITICO // DANIEL STRAUSS

Now it’s the Democratic convention that’s promising to get messy. After piling up millions of votes and wins in 19 states, Bernie Sanders and his supporters are beginning to lay out their expectations for the Democratic National Convention — and they’re expressing deep frustration with what they see as a wall of party resistance. The most recent flare-up occurred last week, when Sanders publicly released a letter to Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz accusing her of stacking the deck against him on the convention's standing committees. “[W]e are prepared to mobilize our delegates to force as many votes as necessary to amend the platform and rules on the floor of the convention," wrote Sanders, several days after a tense phone conversation with the chairwoman. According to a Sanders official with knowledge of the call, the senator demanded more representation on the committees but Wasserman Schultz would only assure him that he would have representation. A DNC spokesman declined to characterize the conversation and would only confirm that it took place.

2016 Republican

What happened when Donald Trump came to Capitol Hill<http://thehill.com/homenews/house/279771-what-happened-when-donald-trump-came-to-capitol-hill>

THE HILL // MIKE LILLIS

There were traffic cones and motorcades; federal agents and Capitol Police. Protestors screamed and reporters swarmed; the bagpipes brayed and the gawkers gawked. Donald Trump had come to town. The Republicans' all-but-certain presidential nominee stormed into Washington on Thursday, captivating Capitol Hill as he bounced from one meeting to the next on a whirlwind tour designed to rally top Republicans –– most notably Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) –– behind his unlikely White House bid. The GOP's most powerful stars gathered first at the Republican National Committee (RNC) headquarters, where Trump met with Ryan, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus and other House leaders before moving across Constitution Avenue to huddle with Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the majority leader, and his top lieutenants at the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

Signs of thaw as Republicans see a different side of Trump<http://thehill.com/homenews/house/279769-signs-of-thaw-as-republicans-see-a-different-side-of-trump>

THE HILL // SCOTT WONG AND JONATHAN EASELY

This was not the usual Donald Trump. In a meeting with Speaker Paul Ryan’s (R-Wis.) leadership team on Thursday, the typically brash Manhattan billionaire was polite, professional, and even deferential at times. During two-plus hours of meetings at the Republican National Committee offices, the presumptive GOP nominee did something he doesn’t seem to do very often on the campaign trail: listen. “He listened. He asked questions and he listened,” House GOP Conference Chairwoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), one of the participants, told The Hill after the summit. For the consummate dealmaker, Trump’s trek to Capitol Hill Thursday represented his biggest and boldest venture yet — namely trying to win over support from leaders of the GOP establishment that he’s repeatedly bashed for the past year.

Reluctant Republican leaders vow to work with Trump<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/reluctant-republican-leaders-vow-to-work-with-trump/2016/05/12/93dba94c-184f-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // JOSE A. DELREAL, KAROUN DEMIRJIAN, AND PAUL KANE

The roiling feud between presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump and reluctant Republican leaders reached a turning point Thursday as the two sides declared their willingness to gloss over substantive policy differences and work together to defeat probable Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in November. House Speaker Paul D. Ryan, who set off a political earthquake last week by refusing to endorse the real estate mogul, told reporters after a high-profile meeting with Trump at the Republican National Committee headquarters that he was “encouraged” by their conversation — though he still stopped short of an endorsement.

Trump, Ryan say they are ‘totally committed’ to uniting their party<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/05/12/republicans-brace-for-outcome-of-trump-ryan-meeting/>

WASHINGTON POST // JOSE DELREAL AND MIKE DEBONIS

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and House Speaker Paul D. Ryan struck a conciliatory tone after meeting in Washington Thursday, seeking to ease tensions that flared last week when Ryan said he is not ready to endorse the business mogul in his bid for the White House. “While we were honest about our few differences, we recognize that there are also many important areas of common ground,” Trump and Ryan (R-Wis.) said in a joint statement shortly after their meeting at the Republican National Committee headquarters on Capitol Hill. “We will be having additional discussions, but remain confident there’s a great opportunity to unify our party and win this fall, and we are totally committed to working together to achieve that goal.” Despite the positive tone of the statement, Ryan is still not committing to supporting Trump as the party’s nominee, although he said he was “encouraged” by their conversation Thursday.

Trump's Charm Offensive Impresses Senate GOP<https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/senate-gop-leaders-talk-trump-meeting>

ROLL CALL // BRIDGET BOWMAN AND NIELS LESNIEWSKI

Positive and productive — that's how Senate Republican leaders described their meeting on Thursday with their party's presumptive presidential nominee, Donald Trump. Trump met with top Senate Republicans for more than an hour, and discussed the tone of his campaign and his effect on the GOP's competitive Senate races. Before the meeting, Trump reached out to one of his most vocal critics with a phone call Wednesday. Sen. Lindsey Graham said he still won't endorse Trump for president, but the South Carolina Republican said the two had a good phone call.

Trump to Senate GOP: I get your concerns<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-meets-senate-republicans-223118>

POLITICO // BURGRESS EVERETT AND SEUNG MIN KIM

The Republican senators that met with Donald Trump on Thursday were united by a shared concern: Trump’s tone and rhetoric. Several lawmakers gently told him that what he says and how he says it matters, both for Trump’s general election campaign and their own chances of keeping the Senate. Trump was in “listening mode,” attendees at the meeting told POLITICO, but gave them the answer that they wanted to hear. “I get that,” Trump told the nearly dozen senators in attendance. Most of them were relieved to hear it. Trump also told senators that he would help raise money in the battle to retain the Senate, which further buoyed Republicans worried about whether he will be a down-ballot drag. In other words, it was a major step forward for the divided party, senators said.

Donald Trump and Paul Ryan Move Toward Ending Standoff and Forging Unity<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/us/politics/donald-trump-paul-ryan-gop.html?ref=politics&_r=0>

NEW YORK TIMES // JENNIFER STEINHAUER AND ALEXANDER BURNS

Donald J. Trump and Speaker Paul D. Ryan appeared to take half a step back from their political standoff on Thursday, as Mr. Trump toured Washington for a swirl of meetings with Republican lawmakers concerned about the direction of his presidential campaign. In public, Mr. Ryan praised Mr. Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, as “warm and genuine,” and declared that a process of reconciliation was underway. Behind closed doors, Mr. Trump pulled back his threat to remove Mr. Ryan as chairman of the Republican National Convention, and offered to help elect the party’s candidates running for the House and the Senate. Significant fissures remain between Mr. Trump and Republican congressional leaders: Mr. Ryan reminded the candidate privately that many voters opposed him in the primaries, and in a separate meeting with senators, several lawmakers urged Mr. Trump to modulate his tone on immigration.

U.S. foreign policy veteran warns Trump would make world less stable<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-foreign-idUSKCN0Y32MP?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reuters+Politics+News%29>

REUTERS // PATRICIA ZENGERLE

Donald Trump's foreign policy proposals would make the world a less stable place, former Secretary of State James Baker told a U.S. Senate hearing on Thursday as the Republican presidential candidate met elsewhere with party congressional leaders. Under questioning from Republican Senator Marco Rubio, a former Trump rival in the presidential race, Baker said the world "would be far less stable" with a weaker NATO or if more countries had nuclear weapons as Trump has proposed. "We've a got a lot of problems today, but we'd have a hell of a lot more if that were the case," Baker told a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, adding that U.S. commitments around the world "promote U.S. security." Trump met with Baker on Thursday at Trump's request, said a Baker spokesman, who declined further comment.

Don’t Let Donald Trump Explain Away His Muslim Ban As Merely A ‘Suggestion’<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-muslim-ban-suggestion_us_57349898e4b08f96c18253f1>

HUFFINGTON POST // IGOR BOBIC

As he shifts gears ahead of the general election, presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump has been busy softening his stance on a number of issues — including self-funding his campaign, taxing the wealthy, raising the federal minimum wage and cutting entitlement spending like Social Security and Medicare. But perhaps the biggest — and most brazen — attempt to make himself more palatable to the GOP establishment and general election voters alike is his recent comment spinning his controversial call to ban all Muslims from entering the United States as “just a suggestion.” “We have a serious problem, and it’s a temporary ban — it hasn’t been called for yet, nobody’s done it, this is just a suggestion until we find out what’s going on,” Trump told Fox News Radio’s Brian Kilmeade on Wednesday.

No, Donald Trump has not softened his stance on banning Muslims<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/no-donald-trump-has-not-softened-his-stance-on-banning-muslims/2016/05/12/6ec8d514-185c-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // JENNA JOHNSON

As headlines popped up this week declaring that Donald Trump had softened his position on banning most foreign Muslims from entering the United States, some Republicans celebrated the news. “Glad h e’s walking it back,” Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) tweeted on Thursday. Except that Trump has not actually walked anything back. The presumptive Republican nominee still wants to ban nearly all members of the world’s fastest-growing religion from entering the United States in an effort to prevent terrorist attacks. As Trump first said in December, such a ban would be temporary and last only until U.S. authorities “find out what’s going on.” He also said then that the ban will not apply to U.S. citizens, and that there would be exceptions for world leaders, athletes and others. The Muslim ban is one of Trump’s most controversial — and popular — proposals, alongside other hard-line steps such as building a U.S.-Mexico border wall and deporting illegal immigrants en masse. A Washington Post-ABC News poll in March found that 54 percent of Republicans supported a ban on foreign Muslims, along with 33 percent of political independents and 15 percent of Democrats.

Donald Trump Won’t Alter Tax Plan, Spokeswoman Says as Confusion Reigns<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/us/politics/donald-trump-wont-alter-tax-plan-spokeswoman-says-as-confusion-reigns.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // JACKIE CALMES

After days of confusion over Donald J. Trump’s hints that he would change his tax plan to reduce its budget-busting cost and make it less generous to the rich, his spokeswoman on Thursday sought to clear things up: He plans no changes, Hope Hicks said, and advisers who say otherwise do not speak for him. One of those advisers, Stephen Moore of the Heritage Foundation, had his own response: “I’m a little bummed out if his spokeswoman says they’re not going to make any changes to the plan.” Mr. Trump set off the speculation a week ago, shortly after becoming the presumptive Republican nominee for president, when he told the business cable network CNBC that his months-old tax plan was just a starting point for a final deal. As for his plan’s tilt toward the rich and corporations, Mr. Trump said, “I am not necessarily a huge fan of that,” adding, “I am so much more into the middle class, who have just been absolutely forgotten in our country.”

Trump disavows ex-butler's Facebook posts about Obama<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-butler-obama-223138>

POLITICO // BRIANNA GURCIULLO

Donald Trump's campaign is distancing itself from the real estate mogul's former butler, whose inflammatory statements — including talk about his desire for President Barack Obama to be killed — have caught the attention of the Secret Service. The latest controversy to touch Trump's campaign kicked up on Thursday when Mother Jones reported that Anthony Senecal, who also worked at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, has posted several times on Facebook about his wish for Obama to die. After the comments came to light, Trump campaign spokeswoman Hope Hicks said in a statement, "Tony Senecal has not worked at Mar-a-Lago for years, but nevertheless we totally and completely disavow the horrible statements made by him regarding the President."

Trump hints that Fallin and Brewer on VP shortlist<http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/279628-trump-says-fallin-and-brewer-on-vp-shortlist>

THE HILL // HARPER NEIDIG

Donald Trump said on Wednesday that former Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer and Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin are both on his shortlist for running mate. In an interview with Fox News’s “On the Record,” the GOP presumptive nominee was asked about Brewer saying that Fallin was on the list. “Well, also Jan. Jan Brewer has been fantastic,” he said. “She has been so fantastic. You know I won so big, her territory, we won so big. And she is a fabulous woman. And I agree with you, the governor of Oklahoma, fabulous person.”

New Super PAC Backing Donald Trump Pledges to Raise $20 Million<http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/05/12/new-super-pac-backing-donald-trump-pledges-to-raise-20-million/>

NEW YORK TIMES // NICK CORASANTI

The candidate who repeatedly says he is self-funding and decries big money in politics sure attracts a lot of “super PAC” support, as another super PAC has spawned to support Donald J. Trump’s general election campaign. Formed by former members of Ben Carson’s campaign, former military officers, Republican strategists and businessmen, the super PAC, the Committee for American Sovereignty, is pledging to raise $20 million before the Republican National Convention in July. In a release, the group said it would spend both on paid broadcast and digital media advertisements, as well as on field programs, voter registration programs and get out the vote operations. “With the recent announcement that a pro-Hillary Clinton’s super PAC has already booked over $90 million in ad time in just seven states in June, it is clear we need to ramp up major donor fundraising efforts, unify Republicans, and take on the Clinton Machine,” Doug Watts, a former Carson staff member who is serving as national executive director and spokesman for the group, said in a statement.

Trump and the Artifice of the Deal<http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/donald-trump-2016-father-artifice-of-the-deal-213888>

POLITICO // SIMON ZUYLEN-WOOD

On the evening of April 14, Donald Trump put on a tuxedo and delivered an unusually restrained speech at the annual fundraising gala of the New York state Republican Party. Though the crucial New York primary was a week away, Trump decided he wouldn’t bother using his allotted 30 minutes to pump his conservative credentials. “Politics gets a little boring,” he told the crowd of 300 political dignitaries. What he wanted to talk about was a building. Significantly for him, the party had booked its event at the Grand Hyatt Hotel, which happens to be the very first building Trump developed, about 40 years ago. So Trump told the story of the hotel they sat in, of the deal that would form the foundation of his real estate empire. “It turned out,” he told the audience, more than once, “to be a great, great, success as a hotel.”

Secret Service to investigate after Trump’s ex-butler calls for Obama to be killed<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/12/secret-service-to-investigate-after-trumps-ex-butler-calls-for-obama-to-be-killed/>

WASHINGTON POST // ELAHE IZADI

The longtime former butler to presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump called for President Obama to be killed, and now the Secret Service said it will conduct an investigation. Liberal magazine Mother Jones reported on Anthony Senecal's Facebook posts, including one from Wednesday in which he wrote Obama "should have been taken out by our military and shot as an enemy agent in his first term." The post was only visible to his Facebook friends, but Senecal confirmed its authenticity to Mother Jones, saying, "I wrote that. I believe that." "The U.S. Secret Service is aware of this matter and will conduct the appropriate investigation," agency spokesman Robert Hoback said in an email Thursday. The Trump campaign denounced Senecal's messages and distanced itself from the former butler at Trump's estate, the Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla. "Tony Senecal has not worked at Mar-a-Lago for years, but nevertheless we totally and completely disavow the horrible statements made by him regarding the President," Trump campaign spokeswoman Hope Hicks said via email.

Five Ways the Republican Convention Could Still Be Contentious<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/14/us/politics/five-ways-the-republican-convention-could-still-be-contentious.html>

NEW YORK TIMES // JEREMY W. PETERS

There is little doubt that Donald J. Trump will emerge from the Republican National Convention in Cleveland as the party’s presidential nominee, but there is still some uncertainty about what could unfold there starting July 18. Over the course of four days, Mr. Trump will have to navigate potential hazards, like hostile delegates suspicious of his conservatism and determined to thwart his candidacy. Complicating matters further, many of those delegates possess an intricate knowledge of the parliamentary process that establishes the convention’s rules and program. Any of them looking to make trouble certainly could try. Recent political conventions have grown so scripted and choreographed that moments of true spontaneity are rare. This year, when history seems to be providing little guiding precedent, could be the one that shatters the calm.

Journalists Wait for Donald Trump, but Meet Only His Papier-Mâché Model<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/us/politics/journalists-wait-for-donald-trump-but-meet-only-his-papier-mache-model.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // ASHLEY PARKER

Donald J. Trump came to Washington on Thursday to unify the Republican Party behind him. That did not quite happen. But here is what did: The political denizens showed once again that Mr. Trump, the reality TV star turned presumptive Republican presidential nominee, can animate the staid capital as much as any other city in America. It helped that Mr. Trump’s visit happened to coincide with the National Cannabis Industry Association’s annual lobbying trip to the Capitol, and onlookers would have been forgiven for thinking that Washington had accidentally eaten the entire pan of brownies. The least exciting part of the whole Trumpapalooza was the meetings themselves — those closed-door huddles between Mr. Trump and Republican leaders, which produced bland statements of “party unity” on both sides but little actual news. Yet the politely subdued signals from both factions belied the frenzy just outside the Republican National Committee’s cream-colored building, where the first two of Mr. Trump’s meetings occurred. There, more than three dozen protesters and more than five dozen members of the news media arrived early as a morning rush-hour crowd looked on quizzically.

Trump and Taxes<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/opinion/trump-and-taxes.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // PAUL KRUGMAN

This seems to be the week for Trump tax mysteries. One mystery is why Donald Trump, unlike every other major party nominee in modern times, is refusing to release his tax returns. The other is why, having decided that he needs experts to clean up his ludicrous tax-cut proposals, he chose to call on the services of the gang that couldn’t think straight. On the first mystery: Mr. Trump’s excuse, that he can’t release his returns while they’re being audited, is an obvious lie. On the contrary, the fact that he’s being audited (or at least that he says he’s being audited) should make it easier for him to go public — after all, he needn’t fear triggering an audit! Clearly, he must be hiding something. What? It could be how little he pays in taxes, a revelation that hurt Mitt Romney in 2012. But I doubt it; given how Mr. Trump rolls, he’d probably boast that his ability to game the tax system shows how smart he is compared to all the losers out there.

Donald Trump and the Art of the Tax Loophole<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/opinion/campaign-stops/donald-trump-and-the-art-of-the-tax-loophole.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // STEVEN RATTNER

Type “Trump system rigged” into the Google search bar and you’ll get more than 500,000 hits. I didn’t inspect all of them but the first 50 were variants of Donald Trump complaining that the Republican primary process was tilted against him. That’s beyond ironic. Mr. Trump and his family have been the beneficiaries of a great rigged system: the tax code, which bestows huge advantages on the real estate business. Throughout his career, Mr. Trump has not only grabbed for every loophole and legal lever he could find, he’s boasted about it. “I’ve taken advantage of the laws of this country, like other people,” Mr. Trump has said. The Republican front-runner has been dodging releasing his returns on the specious grounds that he was being audited. On Tuesday, he told The Associated Press that he wouldn’t release them before the election — period. On Wednesday, he denied saying this, reversed course and said, “Hopefully before the election I’ll release.” “There’s nothing to learn from them,” he said in the Associated Press interview. I’ll bet there’s plenty to learn. More likely, Mr. Trump doesn’t want us to know how small his tax hit is, something that he bragged about earlier in the campaign, before realizing that it could come back to bite him.

Donald Trump’s unsupported claim that crime is ‘through the roof’ because of illegal immigration<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/05/13/donald-trumps-unsupported-claim-that-crime-is-through-the-roof-because-of-illegal-immigration/>

WASHINGTON POST // MICHELLE YE HEE LEE

Trump started a recent rally in California by bringing onstage members of The Remembrance Project, which advocates for family members of those killed by undocumented immigrants. Trump asked the father of Jamiel Shaw to share the story of his son, a 17-year-old football star who was killed in 2008 by a gang member who was in the country illegally. Shaw has appeared in an ad for Trump, and supports Trump’s proposal to deport all “criminal aliens,” who are noncitizens convicted of a crime. Another case Trump often points to is that of Kate Steinle, a young woman in San Francisco who was shot and killed by an undocumented immigrant and a repeat felon who had been deported five times to Mexico. Clearly, stories like this exist. But Trump uses anecdotes as evidence to connect illegal immigration and violent crimes, and to propose deporting the approximately 11 million undocumented believed to be living in the United States. Just how likely are Americans to die from homicide by undocumented immigrants?

Ryan and Trump’s painful sham<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ryan-and-trumps-painful-sham/2016/05/12/7e6bccfa-1876-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // EUGENE ROBINSON

Save us all the faux drama. We already know how this star-crossed courtship is going to end: House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) will decide that Donald Trump isn’t such an ogre after all, and they’ll live unhappily ever after. Ryan will be unhappy, at least. Trump has stolen his party, and there’s nothing Ryan can do in the short term to get it back. “I heard a lot of good things from our presumptive nominee,” Ryan told reporters after his much-ballyhooed Thursday meeting with Trump. “I do believe we are now planting the seeds to get ourselves unified to bridge the gaps and differences.” Translation: Ryan may still not be “there yet,” in terms of a formal endorsement, but we should have no doubt about where he’s headed. Trump came to Washington for meetings with Ryan and other GOP establishment figures as a conqueror, not a supplicant. His populism, xenophobia, isolationism, bigotry and evident love of big government may be anathema to the Republican elite, but the party’s base clearly feels otherwise. Anyone choosing self-interest over principle — a habit I have observed among politicians — would think twice about opposing a man who has received more primary votes than any previous GOP nominee.

The Trump-GOP feud lives on<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/the-trump-gop-feud-lives-on-223150>

POLITICO // ELI STOKOLS

It was exactly the kind of scripted political photo-op that Donald Trump loves to disparage as phony, yet there he was, waving to a phalanx of photographers outside RNC headquarters, smiling and playing along. For an hour, the Republican Party’s presumptive nominee sat face to face with House Speaker Paul Ryan, who just a week ago surprised Trump by declaring he couldn’t yet support his candidacy. And soon after it was over, both men issued a statement expressing optimism about working together – Ryan saying he was “very encouraged” and Trump calling it a “great meeting.” But those platitudes are window dressing, a temporary distraction from the still-real rift dividing the GOP’s intellectual class personified by Ryan and the frustrated, blue-collar base that has anointed a billionaire populist as the party’s new standard-bearer. Indeed, while Trump, Ryan and RNC Chairman Reince Priebus have spent the last week trying to tell the country that there’s nothing to see here, there is, in fact, still plenty to see.

Trump campaign eyes #NeverTrump blacklist<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-campaign-eyes-nevertrump-blacklist-223147>

POLITICO // KENNETH P. VOGEL AND BEN SCHRECKINGER

Donald Trump’s campaign is considering hitting his Republican enemies where it hurts: Their wallets. As Trump moves to work in closer concert with the Republican National Committee apparatus, some campaign aides and allies are pushing him to block lucrative party contracts from consultants who worked to keep him from winning the nomination, according to four sources familiar with the discussions. “The Never Trump vendors and supporters shouldn’t be in striking distance of the RNC, any of its committees or anyone working on behalf of Donald Trump,” said a Trump campaign official. The blacklist talk — which sources say mostly targets operatives who worked for Never Trump groups, but also some who worked for Trump’s GOP presidential rivals or their supportive super PACs — strikes against a Republican consulting class that Trump has assailed as a pillar of a corrupt political establishment. It’s a sweet bit of turnabout for Trump aides and consultants who in recent months were warned that their work for the anti-establishment billionaire real estate showman could diminish their own career prospects.

Insiders: Trump stumbled in general election pivot<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-2016-general-election-pivot-223132>

POLITICO // STEVEN SHEPARD

Half of Republicans think Donald Trump hurt his chances in November during his tumultuous first week as the apparent GOP presidential nominee. That’s according to The POLITICO Caucus — a panel of activists, strategists and operatives in 10 key swing states — which weighed in immediately following this week’s primaries in Nebraska and West Virginia. Republicans who thought Trump dropped the ball pointed to an erratic week — which included shifting positions on key issues, pandering tweets and an interview with The Associated Press in which Trump suggested he would eschew the mechanics of modern politics. “Let me count the ways” it was a bad week for Trump, said an Iowa Republican. “Cinco de Mayo Taco Bowl. Saying data and analytics don't matter in a national campaign. Twitter fights with Elizabeth Warren. Oh, and questioning need to honor full faith and credit obligations to U.S. debt-holders.” “Come on,” a Florida Republican added. “His next Hispanic outreach plan involves a Chihuahua from 1998.” But some thought Trump's attempts at rapprochement with House Speaker Paul Ryan and other establishment Republicans would aid him in unifying the GOP, and saw hints that the GOP was uniting behind Trump despite the nominee’s missteps.

Trump accuses Bezos of using the Washington Post to avoid taxes<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-jeff-bezos-washington-post-223148>

POLITICO // HANNA TRUDO

Donald Trump is done with Jeff Bezos. In an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity on Thursday night, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee alleged that the Amazon founder uses the Washington Post to secure tax benefits for his company. “Every hour we’re getting calls from reporters from The Washington Post asking ridiculous questions and I will tell you, this is owned as a toy by Jeff Bezos, who controls Amazon,” Trump said in response to Hannity's question about how the paper has assigned some 20 reporters to dig deep into his life. Amazon is “getting away with murder, tax-wise,” said Trump. “He’s using the Washington Post for power so that the politicians in Washington don’t tax Amazon like they should be taxed." Bezos, who purchased the Post in 2013 for $250 million, has a broader “antitrust” problem, Trump alleged. “Amazon is controlling so much of what they’re doing,” he said. “And what they’ve done is he bought this paper for practically nothing and he’s using that as a tool for political power against me and against people and I’ll tell you what, we can’t let him get away with it.” Trump went on to criticize the Post's reporters, who he claimed have reported inaccurately on his life.

Editorials/Op-Eds

Republicans, beware: Moderates could help elect Clinton<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/republicans-beware-moderates-could-help-elect-clinton/2016/05/12/f583bdd6-0e4c-11e6-8ab8-9ad050f76d7d_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // STANLEY GREENBERG

Moderate Republicans will have the last word in this dramatic presidential election year. The GOP establishment and its favored candidates view these voters as illegitimate, which is why they lost the primaries to Donald Trump. Now moderates are poised to play similarly decisive roles in the general election — by helping to elect Democrat Hillary Clinton — and in the battle for the party’s future that will follow it. Moderates stand out starkly among the groups that make up the Republican base, for two reasons: They are disproportionately college graduates in a white, working-class party, and they are socially liberal. They have been alienated from a party that won’t accept the revolution that has occurred in American social and sexual mores and move on. Because no candidate this cycle spoke to their issues and grievances, these voters can seem invisible. But according to polling we conducted at Democracy Corps in February, moderates make up a stunning 31 percent of the GOP base.

The Trump train: Our view<http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/05/12/donald-trump-paul-ryan-john-mccain-gop-editorials-debates/84290708/>

USA TODAY // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

For decades, Republicans have promoted limited government, family values and American leadership on the world stage. In recent days, however, these time-honored principles have been called into question as top officeholders have embraced Donald Trump, the presumptive presidential nominee who rejects much of what has defined the GOP for generations. On Thursday, House Speaker Paul Ryan, the party’s intellectual leader and rising star, edged closer to jumping on the Trump train. After a much-ballyhooed meeting on Capitol Hill, Ryan and Trump said they were “totally committed to working together,” though Ryan again stopped short of a formal endorsement. The unlikely passengers already boarding include Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who called Trump unqualified just months ago, and Arizona Sen. John McCain, whose heroism as a prisoner of war in Vietnam was questioned by Trump.

Time to Put the Squeeze on Pakistan<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/12/opinion/time-to-put-the-squeeze-on-pakistan.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

Nearly 15 years after 9/11, the war in Afghanistan is raging and Pakistan deserves much of the blame. It remains a duplicitous and dangerous partner for the United States and Afghanistan, despite $33 billion in American aid and repeated attempts to reset relations on a more constructive course. In coming weeks, Gen. John Nicholson Jr., the new American commander in Afghanistan, will present his assessment of the war. It’s likely to be bleak and may question the wisdom of President Obama’s goal of cutting the American force of 10,000 troops to 5,500 by the end of the year. The truth is, regardless of troop levels, the only hope for long-term peace is negotiations with some factions of the Taliban. The key to that is Pakistan. Pakistan’s powerful army and intelligence services have for years given support to the Taliban and the Haqqani terrorist network and relied on them to protect Pakistani interests in Afghanistan and prevent India from increasing its influence there. Under American pressure, the Pakistan Army recently waged a military campaign against the Taliban in the ungoverned border region. But the Haqqanis still operate in relative safety in Pakistan. Some experts say the army has helped engineer the integration of the Haqqanis into the Taliban leadership.

Making Brazil’s Political Crisis Worse<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/opinion/making-brazils-political-crisis-worse.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

Hours after senators voted overwhelmingly to put her on trial for alleged financial trickery, President Dilma Rousseff of Brazil denounced the effort to impeach her as a coup. “I may have committed errors, but I never committed crimes,” Ms. Rousseff said. That is debatable, but Ms. Rousseff is right to question the motives and moral authority of the politicians who are seeking to oust her. The Brazilian president, who was re-elected in 2014 for a four-year term, has been a lousy politician and an underwhelming leader. But there is no evidence that she abused her power for personal gain, while many of the politicians orchestrating her ouster have been implicated in a huge kickback scheme and other scandals. Brazil’s Supreme Court ruled last week that Eduardo Cunha, the veteran lawmaker who has led the effort to oust Ms. Rousseff, must leave office to stand trial on corruption charges. Vice President Michel Temer, who took charge of the country on Thursday, could be ineligible to run for office for eight years because election authorities recently disciplined him for violating campaign finance limits.

Albany Plays the Schoolyard Bully<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/opinion/albany-plays-the-schoolyard-bully.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

Republicans in the New York State Senate are eager to punish Mayor Bill de Blasio for campaigning against them two years ago in a failed attempt to restore Democratic control in the Legislature. Grudges like this are a natural part of politics. But it would be irresponsible of lawmakers to punish New York City’s 1.1 million schoolchildren as a way of settling a score with Mr. de Blasio. The Senate seemed headed in that direction last week, when lawmakers held a hearing on whether or not to renew the 2002 law that gave Mayor Michael Bloomberg control over the largest public school system in the country. The law has been an unqualified success. It allowed the city to finally create clear lines of authority in a byzantine bureaucracy that was riddled with cronyism; it was even unclear at times how many people were employed in the system. The mayoral control law allowed the city to put in place policy changes that would have been almost impossible under the old regime. Mr. Bloomberg, for example, was able to close failing schools that had turned into dropout factories and replace them with smaller, specialized schools that served students better.

Mr. Ryan Warms Up to Mr. Trump<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/opinion/mr-ryan-warms-up-to-mr-trump.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

On Thursday Paul Ryan, speaker of the House and Donald Trump’s highest-ranking Republican skeptic, sat down with Mr. Trump, the party’s presumed presidential nominee, to find “common ground.” It took 45 minutes. “We will be having additional discussions, but remain confident there’s a great opportunity to unify our party and win this fall,” a joint statement said. Afterward, Reince Priebus, the Republican National Committee chairman, said the meeting was a “very positive step toward party unity,” and noted their “very good chemistry.” Though he did not endorse Mr. Trump, Mr. Ryan called him “a very warm and genuine person.” Mr. Trump spent part of their private meeting declaring his openness to Republican policies he’d disagreed with a day before. For a time it seemed that Mr. Ryan might take a stand against Mr. Trump. Now it appears that he will wind up embracing a candidate who repudiates some Republican policies while also personifying many of the party’s most retrograde views.

Ted Cruz: The Mullahs and Their Missiles<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/13/opinion/ted-cruz-the-mullahs-and-their-missiles.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // TED CRUZ

On Monday, the Iranian military’s deputy chief of staff announced that the Islamic Republic had successfully tested yet another ballistic missile — this time, a high-precision midrange weapon with a reported reach of 2,000 kilometers, or 1,250 miles, and with a degree of accuracy that he claimed to be “without any error.” If these statements are true, the entire Middle East, including Israel, is within the reach of the mullahs’ missiles. It was not revealed if this missile had its genocidal intent actually inscribed on it, as other missiles recently tested by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps have — with the inscription in Hebrew “Israel should be erased from the map.” But it hardly matters. The mullahs’ objectives are plain enough for anyone with eyes to see: The Iranian regime is continuing its determined march toward not only a nuclear weapon, but also the means to launch it, first against Israel and then against the United States. This reality makes all the more inexplicable President Obama’s steadfast faith that, since the election of President Hassan Rouhani in 2013, Iran has been charting a “more moderate course” to the detriment of the old-time hard-liners, and that Mr. Rouhani and his administration would be reliable partners in negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program.

Sheldon Adelson: I endorse Donald Trump for president<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/sheldon-adelson-i-endorse-donald-trump-for-president/2016/05/12/ea89d7f0-17a0-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // SHELDON ADELSON

At the outset of the 2016 election, the GOP primary field was nearly as large as that of last weekend’s Kentucky Derby. In total, 17 Republican hopefuls campaigned to win the party’s nomination for president. Like the Derby, the race for the Republican nomination started from a wide gate — some entries with better post positions, others with more backing. We had candidates with such perceived advantages as wide name identification, large campaign war chests, supposed geographic benefits and other assets they hoped would tip the race in their direction. Ultimately, each candidate had to convince the party’s primary voters across the country that he or she deserved to be the nominee. One candidate has won that race, and now Republicans must join together to make sure he wins the next one. While the primary cycle still has some important elections ahead, it is clear that Donald Trump will be the Republican nominee for president. I am endorsing Trump’s bid for president and strongly encourage my fellow Republicans — especially our Republican elected officials, party loyalists and operatives, and those who provide important financial backing — to do the same.

Sen. Sessions: Election offers a simple choice<http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/05/12/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-jeff-sessions-editorials-debates/84298310/>

USA TODAY // SEN. JEFF SESSIONS
For the first time in a long time, this November will give Americans a clear choice on perhaps the most important issue facing our country and our civilization: whether we remain a nation-state that serves its own people, or whether we slide irrevocably toward a soulless globalism that treats humans as interchangeable widgets in the world market. In Donald Trump, we have a forceful advocate for America. Trump has said that our trade, immigration and foreign policies must be changed to protect the interests of American workers and our nation. In Hillary Clinton, we have a committed globalist. Clinton was an ardent supporter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership — which surrenders American sovereignty to an international union of 12 countries — and has clearly left the door wide open to enacting the pact if elected. There is only one sure way to defeat the TPP, and that is to defeat Hillary Clinton. Meanwhile, Clinton’s immigration platform is the most radical in our history. Freezing deportations. Ending detentions. Halting enforcement. She’d expand President Obama’s illegal amnesty decree, effectively creating open borders.  Clinton’s extremist proposal economically targets our poor African-American and Hispanic communities whose wages and job prospects are being steadily eroded by the huge influx of new foreign workers.

Trump insults the voters yet again<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-insults-the-voters-yet-again/2016/05/12/74fbbbb0-1855-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // EDITORIAL BOARD
Besides his usual brazenness, something unsettling lurks behind Donald Trump’s latest statement that — unlike every other nominee in modern times — he will not make public his tax returns before the November election. “There’s nothing to learn from them,” he told the Associated Press. Earlier, he claimed he could not release his returns because he was being audited. Then he said on Twitter they would be released “when audit is complete, not after election!” To voters considering his fitness to be president, Mr. Trump’s response is that he will be the judge and jury, a paternalistic and insulting attitude toward the public. In fact, there would be much to learn from Mr. Trump’s tax returns and, more broadly, his years as a businessman. We’re not picking this criterion out of thin air; Mr. Trump is the one who repeatedly trumpets his business experience as his qualification for the presidency. His boasting ought to be tested against hard information about how his companies performed, how they were managed and governed, how shareholders and bondholders were treated, how Mr. Trump was compensated, how he managed his tax burden and to what extent he has been a philanthropist. Unfortunately, Mr. Trump’s companies have been largely private in recent years, shielding his accounts from public scrutiny.