Subject: DNC Clips 5.18.2016
From: "Price, Jenna" <[email-masked]>
To: "Price, Jenna" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 04:45:54 -0700

WEATHER: 61F, Cloudy

POTUS and the Administration

Millions more workers would be eligible for overtime pay under new federal rule<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/get-there/wp/2016/05/17/millions-more-workers-would-be-eligible-for-overtime-pay-under-new-federal-rule/>

WASHINGTON POST // JONNELLE MARTEN

The Obama administration will unveil a new rule Wednesday that would make millions of middle-income workers eligible for overtime pay, a move that delivers a long-sought victory for labor groups. The regulations, which were last updated more than a decade ago, would let full-time salaried employees earn overtime if they make up to $47,476 a year, more than double the current threshold of $23,660 a year. The Labor Department estimates that the rule would boost the pockets of 4.2 million additional workers. The move caps a long-running effort by the Obama administration to aid low- and middle-income workers whose paychecks have not budged much in the last few decades, even as the top earners in America have seen their compensation soar. The last update to the rules came in 2004, and Wednesday’s announcement is the third update to the salary threshold for overtime regulations in 40 years.

Obama administration eases economic sanctions on Burma<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-administration-eases-economic-sanctions-on-burma/2016/05/17/c028dfd0-1c71-11e6-8c7b-6931e66333e7_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // DAVID NAKAMURA

The Obama administration on Tuesday announced an easing of some U.S. economic sanctions on Burma, a move designed to foster greater trade ties with the once-isolated Southeast Asian nation that is undergoing a fitful democratic transition. The Treasury Department said it was altering regulatory provisions to allow more U.S. citizens and financial institutions in Burma, also known as Myanmar, to engage in economic transactions. The administration also removed seven state-owned Burmese enterprises and three state-owned banks from a list of businesses whose international assests are blocked. Administration officials emphasized that President Obama renewed his authority to impose the sanctions but that the easing follows a successful democratic election last fall that led to a transition of power to the long-oppressed opposition party.

Senate confirms Eric Fanning as the first openly gay Army Secretary<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/05/17/senate-confirms-eric-fanning-as-the-first-openly-gay-army-secretary/>

WASHINGTON POST // KAROUN DEMIRJIAN

The Senate confirmed Eric Fanning as Army secretary Tuesday evening, making him the first openly gay person to lead a military service. President Obama nominated Fanning to the post last September, but his candidacy was delayed in recent months by a hold from Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), objecting not to Fanning himself, but to the administration’s Guantanamo policy. Roberts held up Fanning’s nomination to protest Obama’s plans to transfer detainees at the prison facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States, concerned that such a move could mean that prisoners would be housed at the military base in Ft. Leavenworth, Kan. Roberts was unconvinced that legal prohibitions against using federal funds to relocate detainees to the United States would prevent the president from trying to do so by executive order.

Democrats running out of options in Garland fight<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/senate-dems-garland-options-223285>

POLITICO // SEUNG MIN KIM AND BURGESS EVERETT

Merrick Garland’s highly anticipated Supreme Court nominee questionnaire — unsolicited by Republicans — came and went last week without making a major splash. Millions of dollars have been spent on ads, with little movement on either side. Now, Senate Democrats will hold a forum Wednesday, featuring proxies for Garland, but that may be the closest the chamber gets to a confirmation hearing for him before November. Meanwhile, the White House has run through essentially all of the Republicans who have been willing to sit down for a courtesy meeting with Garland. None has backed away from the blockade. And in some cases, those meetings have even reinforced Republican opposition against Garland, the respected chief judge of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Public polling suggests many voters back the Democratic position, but that fact that hasn’t budged Republicans from their dug-in opposition. And the Democrats’ break-glass-in-case-of-emergency option — running through procedural hoops to force a vote on Garland’s nomination — remains on the table, but comes with its own potential risks.

Obama rushes out rules to guarantee legacy<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/obama-rushes-out-rules-to-guarantee-legacy-223301>

POLITICO // TIMOTHY NOAH

The Obama administration is shoveling out regulations nearly one-third faster in its final year than during the previous three — all to beat a May 23 deadline to prevent a President Donald Trump from overturning them. A total of 195 regulations have been pushed through since Jan. 1 at an estimated cost of $69.5 billion to the nation’s businesses, according to the conservative American Action Forum. One of the most significant — a sweeping rule that will extend overtime pay to more than four million people without any input from Congress — was released Tuesday night. “This regulatory onslaught has only gotten worse in the administration’s final months,” complained Rep. John Kline (R.-Minn.), who chairs the House committee on Education and the Workforce. The whoosh of final rules on everything from e-cigarette use to greenhouse gas emissions exceeds the pace during the same period in the Clinton administration. The goal is deny Trump the opportunity to kill those regulations under an expedited process should he be elected president and Congress remain in Republican control.

Democrats

Senate Votes to Advance Emergency Funding to Fight Zika Virus<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/us/zika-senate-vote-emergency-funding.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // DAVID HERSZENHORN

The Senate voted on Tuesday to advance $1.1 billion in emergency financing to combat the mosquito-borne Zika virus — less than the $1.9 billion requested by the White House, and setting up a confrontation with House Republicans who have put forward a plan with just $622 million reallocated from other programs. The action in the Senate was a sign that even in a bitterly contentious election year, compromise is still possible, at least in that chamber. A proposal to grant the full White House request failed, as did a proposal that would have appropriated the money, but with offsetting spending cuts. The vote on the compromise plan was 68 to 29, with 22 Republicans joining Democrats in favor and no Democrats opposed.

Dem senator blocks push to tie 'gun ban' to spending bill<http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/280276-dem-senator-blocks-push-to-tie-gun-ban-fight-to-spending-bill>

THE HILL // JORDAIN CARNEY

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) blocked a GOP-push to link a larger fight over veterans in the FBI background check system to a spending bill currently before the Senate. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) tried to bring up an amendment to block the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from using funds to report veterans to the National Instant Background Check System unless a court has determined that they are a danger to themselves or others. "There appears to be a troubling trend within the VA," Grassley said Tuesday. "The VA does not even determine whether veterans are a danger to themselves or others before reporting the names to that gun ban list." Grassley's amendment was backed by GOP Sen. Joni Ernst (Iowa), Jim Inhofe (Okla.), Jerry Moran (Kansas) and Pat Roberts (Kansas). Durbin, however, objected to Grassley's amendment, saying it would only create "a bigger problem."

House, Senate leaders ‘finalizing’ chemical bill compromise<http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/280277-house-senate-leaders-finalizing-chemical-bill-compromise>

THE HILL // TIMOTHY CAMA

Leading lawmakers in the House and Senate said Tuesday evening they are in the final stages of hammering out a compromise bill to reform federal chemical safety standards. After months of negotiation, representatives of House Republicans, Senate Republicans and Senate Democrats said a final deal is near to reconcile the different measures the chambers passed last year to reform the nearly 40-year-old Toxic Substances Control Act. “House and Senate negotiators are finalizing a TSCA reform bill that represents an improvement over both the House and Senate bills in key respects,” the lawmakers said in a joint statement. “Current federal law only provides very limited protection. We are hopeful that Congress will be taking action soon on reforming this important environmental law.” The lawmakers did not set a timeline for the final bill. But earlier Tuesday, many of the leading lawmakers said the deal was days away.

Wasserman Schultz on Sanders' response to Nevada chaos: 'Anything but acceptable'<http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/05/wasserman-schultz-sanders-223304>

POLITICO // DANIEL STRAUSS

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz panned Bernie Sanders' response to reports of violence at the Nevada Democratic state convention over the weekend, calling it "anything but acceptable." Wasserman Schultz was speaking on CNN on Tuesday night, after a day in which the Sanders campaign exchanged pointed public statements with the DNC and the Nevada Democratic Party over allegations that the campaign encouraged "extra-parliamentary behavior — indeed, actual violence" at the convention, in the words of the state Democratic Party. The DNC chairwoman was asked whether she had spoken with Sanders on Tuesday about the convention. She said she had not but that Sanders' 10-minute discussion with Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) was sufficient.

DNC chairwoman chides Sanders<http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/280300-dnc-chairwoman-chides-sanders>

THE HILL // JONATHAN EASLEY

Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz chided Bernie Sanders on Tuesday night, saying his response to chaos at the Nevada Democratic convention over the weekend was unacceptable. “Unfortunately, the senator’s response was anything but acceptable. It certainly did not condemn his supporters for acting violently or engaging in intimidation tactics and added more fuel to the fire,” Wasserman Schultz said on CNN. “The Sanders campaign and Sen. Sanders himself should outright condemn that specific conduct but they also need to take steps to prevent it and make sure their supporters understand the best way to express any frustration over process is to be orderly, not respond with violence and intimidation,” she added. “That needs to be unequivocally condemned, and unfortunately it has not been unequivocally condemned. Tensions between the Sanders campaign and the national party burst into the open on Tuesday after mayhem in Las Vegas over the weekend. Front-runner Hillary Clinton won more support in the state's caucuses in February, but Sanders supporters packed the party convention hoping to win their candidate a few more delegates. But they say their efforts were thwarted by the state party and accuse local Democratic officials of rigging the convention in Clinton's favor.

DNC chair rips Sanders response to Nevada chaos<http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/17/politics/bernie-sanders-nevada-democrats/>

CNN // TOM LOBIANCO

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said Tuesday that Bernie Sanders' response to the chaos his supporters caused in Nevada was "anything but acceptable," likening it to the violence occasionally seen at Donald Trump events. Wasserman Schultz told CNN's Wolf Blitzer that she thought Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid's request that Sanders issue a statement about the chaos "was enough. Unfortunately, the senator's response was anything but acceptable. It certainly did not condemn his supporters for acting violently or engaging in intimidation tactics and instead added more fuel to the fire." Sanders issued a defiant statement Tuesday, knocking Democratic Party leaders in Nevada and threatening national party leaders with potential damage in the general election. "It is never OK for violence and intimidation to be the response to that frustration. That's what happens with the Trump campaign. We can never resort to the tactics that they engage in," Wasserman Schultz said. Sanders supporters shut down the Nevada Democrats' convention Saturday, reportedly flinging chairs and sending death threats to the state party chairwoman. But in a statement Tuesday, Sanders accused state party leaders of ramming through rules that he said blocked his supporters and threatened the national party with potentially dire consequences in the general election.

Pelosi: 'Significant concerns' about ICE deportations<http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/280297-pelosi-significant-concerns-about-ice-deportations>

THE HILL // MIKE LILLIS

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is pushing back hard against the Obama administration's efforts to deport those seeking asylum from violence in Central America. In a statement issued late Tuesday, the California Democrat expressed doubts that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations are reinforced by proper legal protections for those affected, and she amplified concerns that the deportees will be returned to perilous conditions in the so-called Northern Triangle countries of El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala. “ICE’s deportation actions raise significant concerns about whether the rights of due process and the safety of desperate families are being respected," Pelosi said. "House Democrats have consistently said that ICE must not proceed with deportations unless meaningful action is taken to address these problems." The Department of Homeland Security launched its first wave of arrests in January, rounding up 121 asylum seekers who'd been denied refugee status. Most of them were women and children who entered the country during a surge of migrants in 2014. At the time, tens of thousands of people, many of them families and unaccompanied children, arrived seeking asylum from Central American violence and instability.

Can Tim Kaine be Hillary Clinton's attack dog?<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/tim-kaine-hillary-clinton-attack-223296>

POLITICO // EDWARD-ISAAC DOVERE

To many — in the White House, in and around Hillary Clinton’s orbit, and among top Democrats — the question of “Could Tim Kaine be a good vice president?” is settled. It's how the Virginia senator would do as an attack-dog running mate that’s still in question. And when the opposition is a bully bomb-throwing genius who seems ready to say just about anything, when people worry that Bill Clinton will spend the campaign bouncing off the walls complaining that they're not hitting back enough, that has top Democratic operatives nervous. The Virginia senator has been on every speculative vice-presidential short list for years. And not just among the kibitzers: After all, he was the runner-up on Barack Obama's short list in 2008, and Clinton uber-confidant Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe has this year been pushing Kaine constantly in conversations with both Clintons, who’ve been talking about him more, too (McAuliffe’s spokesman said the governor’s been urging them to consider both his state’s senators).

Senate Democrat Tasked With Tax Policy Takes Aim at Derivatives<http://www.wsj.com/articles/senate-democrat-tasked-with-tax-policy-takes-aim-at-derivatives-1463544001>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // RICHARD RUBIN

If Democrats retake the Senate this fall, tax policy will fall to Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, who is beginning to elaborate on his priorities and plans. Mr. Wyden recently released a plan to overhaul the rules companies use to calculate their annual depreciation deductions on capital assets. On Wednesday, he will take aim at the use of derivatives as a tax-avoidance technique. Further detailed proposals are on the way to shrink the difference between the tax rules for most Americans and the very wealthy, the senator said. “The fortunate can basically, with good tax counsel, figure out what they’re going to pay and when they’re going to pay it. So we would radically change that,” Mr. Wyden said in an interview. “We’re trying to lay out the ideas that we think are central to developing bipartisan tax reform.” Mr. Wyden’s derivative proposal would require owners of certain derivatives to mark their value to market each year and pay income taxes on any gains as ordinary income, not at lower capital gains rates. The plan would also require taxpayers to pay capital gains taxes as if they sold an asset in certain cases. That could be triggered, for example, if they enter into an agreement such as a collar, which uses put and call options to lock in future capital gains within a narrowly specified range without actually realizing those gains, said an aide to Mr. Wyden.

House Dems urge enforcement of Colombia trade deal<http://thehill.com/policy/finance/trade/280281-house-dems-urge-enforcement-of-colombia-trade-deal>

THE HILL // VICKI NEEDHAM

Several House Democrats on Tuesday urged the Obama administration to take steps to protect workers rights in Colombia. Led by Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), the Democrats said that labor action plan in the Colombia trade deal, which was ratified by Congress in 2011, has fallen far short of expectations and needs to be enforced. “Since the U.S. entered into the Colombia trade agreement, my colleagues and I have called upon the administration to fully enforce the agreement’s labor provisions," DeLauro said. "However, worker abuse continues to run rampant, ongoing threats and acts of violence are not investigated or prosecuted and workers have lost their lives,” she said. The lawmakers argued that the lack of enforcement on the Colombia agreement should give Congress pause when considering a sweeping Asia-Pacific trade deal. "That is why we must reject the nearly identical labor provisions in the Trans-Pacific Partnership," DeLauro said. Mark Pocan (Wis.) said that "nothing has substantively changed in the country and it’s absolutely unconscionable." "This is the exact reason why we are so skeptical of the Trans-Pacific Partnership," Pocan said. On Monday, the AFL-CIO and four labor unions in Colombia filed a complaint with the U.S. Labor Department saying that the promised improvement of labor rights there haven't been realized.

Sherrod Brown throws cold water on Clinton VP talk<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/sherrod-brown-clinton-veep-223293>

POLITICO // NICK GASS

Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown may support Hillary Clinton, but the Democratic senator provided one reason Tuesday that he might think twice before accepting an invitation to be her running mate: Ohio Gov. John Kasich would nominate his replacement if the ticket is successful. Chris Matthews opened his interview with Brown on MSNBC's "Hardball" by asking whether his name was being considered by Clinton's campaign. "Tim Kaine and I were talking together today at lunch. We've very good friends and his name and my name are mentioned," Brown said, referring to his colleague from Virginia who has similarly deflected questions about joining Clinton's ticket. "We have no idea how this is done.”

Reid 'surprised' by 'silly statement' from Sanders<http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/280259-reid-surprised-by-silly-statement-from-sanders>

THE HILL // ALEXANDER BOLTON

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) said he was “surprised” Tuesday by what he called a "silly statement" issued by Sen. Bernie Sanders defending his supporters after chaos erupted at Nevada's Democratic convention. “I’m surprised at the statement. I thought he was going to do something different,” Reid told CNN's Manu Raju in an interview. Reid's office provided a transcript of a conversation. “Bernie should say something and not have some silly statement. Bernie is better than that. He should say something about this [and] not have some statement someone else prepared for him,” Reid said. Reid was expecting Sanders to condemn unruly behavior at the convention, much of which Democrats have blamed on Sanders supporters. Instead, the Sanders statement largely criticized the Democratic establishment.

DNC chair faces primary upstart<http://thehill.com/homenews/house/280265-dnc-chair-faces-primary-upstart>

THE HILL // LISA HAGEN

Tim Canova wants you to know he didn’t just come out of nowhere to challenge the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) for her House job. The law professor says it has been years in the making, sparked by multiple phone calls to Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz that weren’t returned. But what makes this David and Goliath story noteworthy, more than the fact that Canova is the Florida congresswoman’s first primary challenger, is that he says he has raised more than $1 million since kicking off his campaign in January. That total comes despite him being relatively unknown compared to the woman he is challenging. “His name ID is higher among D.C. reporters than actual voters,” said Ashley Walker, a Florida Democratic strategist who worked on Barack Obama’s presidential campaigns. “My sense is he’s kind of come out of nowhere, not somebody who’s been involved in the community or party or this area.” But while Canova has not been involved locally, he was an aide to the late Sen. Paul Tsongas (D-Mass.) and says he has volunteered on numerous political campaigns. He also has a history of taking positions on issues that differ from Wasserman Schultz’s.

Republicans

House Majority PAC Adds $5M in Fall TV Ad Reservations<https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/house-majority-pac-adds-5m-fall-tv-ad-reservations>

ROLL CALL // SIMONE PATHE

House Majority PAC, the group that helps elect Democrats to the House, announced Tuesday an additional $5.2 million in early TV reservations for the final weeks of the election. The outside group added time for ads in six new media markets and upped its buys in several other markets. The group has now reserved nearly $19 million in 21 media markets. The reservations are an early signal of what races Democrats expect to put in play later this year.

Rand Paul, trying to return to the Senate, wins Kentucky Republican nomination<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/05/17/rand-paul-plays-catch-up-in-money-chase-as-hes-expected-to-clinch-kentucky-senate-nod/>

WASHINGTON POST // ELISE VIEBECK

Rand Paul easily won his Senate primary Tuesday night, setting the stage for what could be a tough general election campaign against Lexington Mayor Jim Gray, a Democrat. As expected, Paul triumphed Tuesday night over two nominal GOP opponents with over 80 percent of the vote with just 15 percent of precincts reporting, with the race being called by the Associated Press shortly after Kentucky polls closed at 7 p.m. Eastern. Gray was also expected to win the Democratic contest, although the race was not called immediately after polls closed. Now, both parties will turn to the general election. Republicans hope Paul can pull off a repeat performance of his home state colleague Mitch McConnell’s crushing defeat against Alison Lundergan Grimes in 2014.

Mitch McConnell Says Women Should Have to Register for Military Draft<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/us/politics/mitch-mcconnell-says-women-should-have-to-register-for-military-draft.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // DAVID HERSZENHORN

The Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell said on Tuesday that he believed the role of women in the military had expanded so broadly in recent years that they should be required to register for the draft just as men do. Mr. McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, was quick to stress that he did not envision any return to the use of the Selective Service and believed that the volunteer, professional military had been “very successful.” House Republicans had been contemplating an amendment to the annual military policy bill that would have required women to register for the Selective Service, but the Rules Committee on Monday dropped the amendment from consideration. In recent months a number of senior military officials and influential members of Congress have expressed support for the idea.

Sen. Sessions: 'Unlikely' any good would come out of a Trump-Kim Jong Un meeting<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-sessions-north-korea-223287http:/www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-sessions-north-korea-223287>

POLITICO // NICK GASS

Donald Trump might be willing to hold negotiations with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, as he expressed in an interview with Reuters on Tuesday, but the presumptive Republican nominee's first Senate endorser said that while he would support such a diplomatic maneuver, "it's unlikely" anything good would come of it. "Well you just have to be very careful about that. If he means actually opening up a possibility of a discussion to see if it's fruitful, that's one thing," Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions told CNN's Wolf Blitzer. Sessions then remarked that nobody has run for president "in years who understands how to negotiate more effectively than Donald Trump." "And I do believe he will not be disadvantaged by Kim Jong-Il [sic] or anybody in North Korea," Sessions said. (Blitzer later corrected him to clarify that he was referring to the current leader and not his father, who died in 2011.)

GOP chairman: Gitmo detainees sent to 'ill-equipped' countries<http://thehill.com/policy/defense/280267-gop-obama-administration-knowingly-transferred-gitmo-detainees-without-proper>

THE HILL // KRISTINA WONG

The GOP chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee is accusing the Obama administration of sending Guantanamo detainees to countries it knew could not handle them. “Many Committee Members are concerned that in the rush to close this facility, the Administration is making agreements with countries that are ill-equipped to prevent recidivism,” Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) wrote in letters to Secretary of State John Kerry and Defense Secretary Ash Carter. “Worse yet, it may be attempting to cover up this irresponsible policy. The testimony of Special Envoys for Guantanamo Closure Paul Lewis and Lee Wolosky before the Committee appears to conflict with documents provided to Congress.” Royce said Lewis and Wolosky at a March 23 House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing denied that the administration had ever knowingly transferred a detainee to a country that could not mitigate the risk of recidivism or maintain control of that person.   But Royce said their statements conflict with classified notifications provided to Congress by the administration. “Classified reports submitted on May 31, 2013, July 15, 2014, and August 6, 2015, are riddled with derogatory assessments of some of the countries to which the Bush and Obama Administrations have transferred detainees. In many cases, these intelligence assessments preceded the transfer of individuals to these same countries,” Royce said in a statement.

Does Democratic Weakness Create Republican Opportunity?<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/opinion/campaign-stops/does-democratic-weakness-create-republican-opportunity.html>

NEW YORK TIMES // THOMAS B. EDSALL

Earlier this month, Newt Gingrich, the former speaker of the House and a presidential candidate in 2012, released a set of recommendations for Republicans running for election this year. Gingrich put together the 22-page manifesto, “2016 Election Principles,” at the request of the Republican National Committee. The document — in essence a master plan that comes with the strong endorsement of Reince Priebus, the chairman of the R.N.C. — stresses the need for “widespread inclusion of ethnic groups.” It sounds remarkably like an across-the-board renunciation of Donald Trump’s campaign strategy. This presents something of a paradox, though, because Newt Gingrich claims to be one of Trump’s strongest supporters. In March, well before it was clear that Trump would go on to win the nomination, Gingrich told Slate that Trump has had the nerve to raise questions in a clear language because he represents the millions of Americans who are sick and tired of being told that they have to be guilt-ridden and keep their mouth shut.

Benghazi Panel Chief Nullifies a Key Republican Theory, Democrats Say<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/us/politics/benghazi-panel-chief-nullifies-key-republican-theory.html>

NEW YORK TIMES // MARK LANDER

The chairman of the House select committee investigating the 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, said on Tuesday that military reinforcements could not have reached the besieged diplomatic outpost in time to prevent the killings of four Americans, including Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. The panel’s chairman, Representative Trey Gowdy, Republican of South Carolina, told Fox News: “Whether or not they could have gotten there in time, I don’t think there’s any issue with respect to that. They couldn’t. The next question is: Why could you not? Why were you not positioned to do it?” Democrats seized on Mr. Gowdy’s admission, saying that it nullified one of the main Republican criticisms of how the Obama administration — including Hillary Clinton, the secretary of state at the time — handled the episode. Republicans have argued that the Pentagon was directed not to send reinforcements to back up the outnumbered security forces battling militants on the night of Sept. 11, 2012.

Clash in GOP over Zika funding<http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/280273-clash-in-gop-over-zika-funding>

THE HILL // PETER SULLIVAN

The House and Senate are on a collision course over funding to deal with the Zika virus. Republicans in both chambers are moving forward with legislation after months of Democratic pressure, but their proposals differ sharply. In the Senate, Republicans worked with Democrats to craft a bill with $1.1 billion in new funding to fight the virus. That measure advanced in the Senate on Tuesday by a vote of 68-29. But the House is on a different page, with Republicans on Monday unveiling Zika legislation with $622 million in funding, both below the Senate’s level and far less than the $1.9 billion sought by the White House.  In addition, the cost of the House bill is offset partly by redirecting money that had been set aside for responding to the 2014 Ebola virus epidemic. Democrats denounced the House bill on Tuesday, bolstered by a veto threat from the White House. But the Democrats largely held their fire on the Senate’s compromise measure, even as House conservatives warned it was unacceptable. “There’s a big gulf between where the Senate is and where the House is on this,” said conservative Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.).

Where Republican Dreams Die?<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/opinion/where-republican-dreams-die.html>

NEW YORK TIMES // FRANK BRUNI

Ohio and Florida. Florida and Ohio. What a pair of election-year divas, always preening for the pundits. Enough. There are other comely swing states on the stage. Let’s gawk at North Carolina. If Donald Trump drags down Republicans across the board, this is one of the places where they’ll flail. Its Republican governor, nearing the end of a tumultuous first term, is in trouble. One of the state’s two Republican senators is facing a tougher re-election battle than was predicted just months ago. Democrats are circling. Make that drooling. Although purple, North Carolina turned deceptively red over the last few years, and Republican lawmakers have behaved with a potentially suicidal swagger. In the process they’ve managed to enrage corporate America, exposing a newly profound tension in the G.O.P. between its business-minded wing and the religious right. Some of the most interesting crosswinds of American politics blow through this state. In 2008 it voted for Barack Obama — by a margin of just .32 percent. Enthusiasm for him helped to propel Democratic women to the Senate and the governor’s office. Both are gone now, replaced by Republican men, and Mitt Romney won the state narrowly in 2012. But the more sweeping change has been in the state legislature, where an overwhelming Republican majority took hold and hurtled forward (or, rather, backward).

New Jersey voters don't want Christie to be Trump's VP<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/poll-chris-christie-no-trump-vice-president-223311>

POLITICO // NOLAN D. MCCASKILL

An overwhelming majority of New Jersey voters don’t want to see Gov. Chris Christie on Donald Trump’s ticket, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday. Seventy-two percent of voters in the state are opposed to Christie becoming Trump’s vice presidential pick. Even Republicans (64 percent) are against the Trump-Christie duo. Christie has also hit an all-time low in approval ratings, the poll shows. Sixty-four percent of New Jersey voters disapprove of the job he’s doing as governor. Republicans (59 percent) are the only group that approve of Christie’s job. Meanwhile, Democrats (86 percent) and independents (66 percent) overwhelmingly disapprove. The Quinnipiac University poll surveyed 1,989 New Jersey voters May 10-16 via landlines and cellphones. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.2 percentage points.

2016 Democrats

Nevada Unrest Shows Democratic Rifts<http://www.wsj.com/articles/bernie-sanders-says-campaign-committed-to-nonviolence-amid-nevada-dust-up-1463516614>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // BRYON TAU

Bernie Sanders’s feud with the Democratic establishment and front-runner Hillary Clinton continued to boil Tuesday in the wake of an unruly party convention in Nevada, raising new doubts about how easily the party can unite behind its eventual presidential nominee. In the latest turn, the Vermont senator in a statement Tuesday rejected accusations that his supporters were prone to violence and insisted the party must accommodate people fighting for “real” change. The comments stood as a clear sign that the Democratic underdog is unwilling to play the role of fence-mender while he battles Mrs. Clinton in the final primaries. At the Nevada state Democratic convention Saturday in Las Vegas, disputes between supporters of Mr. Sanders and party officials turned physical. After the event, the Mr. Sanders’s supporters flooded the state party chairwoman with text messages and voice mails—some containing veiled threats and obscene comments, according to screenshots and voice mails compiled by the Nevada Democratic Party.

Tensions explode in Dem primary<http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/280269-tensions-explode-in-dem-primary>

THE HILL // ALEXANDER BOLTON

Bernie Sanders is standing by his supporters in the face of mounting criticism from Democratic leaders, including Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, over the increasingly nasty tone of the Democratic presidential primary. Sanders on Tuesday issued a statement rejecting claims by Hillary Clinton’s allies that his campaign has shown a penchant for violence as “nonsense.” It was released just minutes after Reid went before cameras in the Senate to call on Sanders to do “the right thing” and hold his supporters accountable for the chaotic scene that took place Saturday at Nevada’s state convention. The starkly different messages showed off a Democratic split that is getting worse than the fight within the GOP over presumptive presidential nominee Donald Trump.

Clinton-Sanders Fight Turns Violent<https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/democrats-get-physical>

ROLL CALL // STEPHANIE AKIN AND JOHN BENNETT

A campaign rally in California is cut short by a unruly crowd. Outside, protesters shout obscenities and rip in half a young girl's campaign poster. A celebrity, Wendell Pierce of "The Wire" fame, is jailed after he pushes a man during a political disagreement, then grabs his girlfriend by the hair. A delegate at a Nevada political convention lies motionless on the floor as someone yelled into a public address microphone, "We need a medic to the front!" Such stories have become all too familiar after the rowdy, and sometimes violent political demonstrations that followed Donald Trump's rise to the top of the Republican ticket. Except these recent melees all involved Democrats.

Clinton claims Kentucky victory<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-headache-2016-223224>

POLITICO // NICK GASS

Hillary Clinton claimed victory over Bernie Sanders on Tuesday night in Kentucky, with less than two thousand votes separating the two Democratic primary contenders. The Associated Press said Tuesday night that the race was too close to call, with more than 99 percent of precincts reporting. "We just won Kentucky!" Clinton's official account tweeted. "Thanks to everyone who turned out. We’re always stronger united." The lack of a decisive win – combined with an expected victory for Sanders later this evening in Oregon – would be a major irritant for Clinton, who has already launched the early stages of an all-out assault on Donald Trump, despite not being able to shake a dogged Sanders.

Ky. secretary of state declares Clinton 'unofficial winner' in primary<http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/dem-primaries/280203-clinton-takes-kentucky>

THE HILL // BEN KASIMAR

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is projected to win the Kentucky primary, according to Kentucky Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes. Clinton will win the majority of the state’s 55 pledged delegates as she moves closer to clinching the nomination. Polls closed in the state at 7 p.m. but the margin was razor thin and the race was too close to call until after 10 p.m., when Grimes appeared on CNN to discuss the results. The former secretary of State poured resources into Kentucky in the hopes of staving off Bernie Sanders, holding five events in the state since Sunday. Two key factors may have broken in Clinton’s favor in Kentucky. The state holds a closed primary where only Democrats can participate, a fact that likely hurt Sanders, who draws outsized support from independents.

Clinton releases personal financial disclosure, calls on Trump to release income taxes<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-hillary-finances-idUSKCN0Y904G>

REUTERS // ALANA WISE

Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton on Tuesday released her personal financial disclosure form, covering Jan. 1, 2015, to the present, with a call to Republican Donald Trump to make available his income tax returns. "The true test for Donald Trump is whether he will adhere to the precedent followed by every presidential candidate in the modern era and make his tax returns available, as Hillary Clinton has done," spokeswoman Christina Reynolds said in a statement. Clinton's own disclosure form showed more than $5 million in royalties from her memoir "Hard Choices." Trump earlier in the day announced that he had filed his personal financial disclosure to the Federal Election Commission on Monday.

Clintons’ Speaking Fees Decline 93% in Latest Disclosure<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-18/clintons-speaking-fees-decline-93-in-latest-disclosure>

BLOOMBERG // LYNNLEY BROWNING

Hillary and Bill Clinton disclosed almost $1.7 million in new earnings from the former president’s speeches last year, according to the couple’s latest financial disclosure. That’s down almost $23 million, or 93 percent, from the prior 16 months. The Clintons also reported earning between $172,508 and $1.2 million in dividends and interest from Jan. 1, 2015 through May 16, according to the required filing, which the Democratic presidential front-runner’s campaign released to the media Tuesday night. The Clintons’ net worth, as indicated on the form, is between $11.3 million and $52.7 million -- not including their multimillion dollar homes in Washington and New York, any federal government retirement accounts they may have, or personal items such as furniture and artwork. The disclosure form requires reporting within wide ranges of values; the couple’s net worth totals didn’t change from the financial disclosure that Hillary Clinton filed in May 2015.

Bill Clinton earned $5 million from speeches last year<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/bill-clinton-speeches-hillary-223299>

POLITICO // ANNIE KARNI

Bill Clinton raked in $5 million in paid speeches last year, according to his wife’s most recent personal financial disclosure released Tuesday night, including $2.7 million after Hillary Clinton announced her presidential run. Four days after the former secretary of state announced online last April that she would mount a second bid for the White House, Bill Clinton was paid $300,000 for a speech in front of the Oracle Corporation in Rancho Mirage, California, the disclosure shows. Over the past year, he has also given speeches to groups such as the Wyndham Hotel Group in Las Vegas; the private equity firm Apollo Management Holdings; UBS Wealth Management; and the Texas China Business Council, among other groups. The Clintons’ lucrative speech-giving side gigs have emerged as major issues for the Democratic front-runner on the campaign trail. Hillary Clinton has refused to release transcripts of her speeches in front of Wall Street firms like Goldman Sachs.

Sanders campaign manager: There won't be violence in Philadelphia<http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/05/bernie-sanders-supporters-violence-convention-223295>

POLITICO // DANIEL STRAUSS

Bernie Sanders' campaign manager unequivocally said on Tuesday that there would be no violence or serious conflict at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia in July, while also describing the chaos at last Saturday’s Nevada Democratic convention as an "aberration." "There's not going to be any violence in Philadelphia, Wolf, I guarantee that," Jeff Weaver said in an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer. "We hope for a fair and orderly convention. I think whoever the ultimate nominee is we want to unify the party on the back of the convention so we can all go out and defeat Donald Trump in the fall." Weaver's comments come in the wake of a tumultuous state convention in Las Vegas over the weekend which Sanders supporters sought to derail the event out of frustration over the delegate allocation process. Some participants at the event focused their ire on Nevada Democratic Party Chairwoman Roberta Lange, posting her phone number online, which resulted in a flood of death threats.

Bernie Sanders Facing Pressure Over Supporters’ Actions in Nevada<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/us/politics/bernie-sanders-supporters-nevada.html?ref=politics&_r=0>

NEW YORK TIMES // YAMICHE ALCINDOR

Raising the prospect of lasting fissures in the Democratic Party, Senator Bernie Sanders rebuffed mounting pressure on Tuesday to rein in his supporters after they disrupted a weekend Democratic convention in Nevada, throwing chairs and later threatening the state party chairwoman in a fight over delegates. The uproar comes as Hillary Clinton is struggling to turn her and the party’s attention to the general election. Mr. Sanders’s supporters showed no sign of backing down on Tuesday. In interviews, several threatened to disrupt the party’s convention in Philadelphia in July with protests and nonviolent disobedience over a nominating system that they say has treated Mr. Sanders unfairly. In emails, on social media and on websites, his supporters have traded advice about protest tactics and legal services in case of mass arrests. Alarmed by the unrest in Nevada on Saturday, Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, said that he spoke with Mr. Sanders for 10 minutes on Tuesday and that the Vermont senator faced a “test of leadership” over the behavior of his supporters. Mr. Reid, who represents Nevada, said he had urged Mr. Sanders to “do the right thing.”

Sanders' Quest for Superdelegates Loses One After Virgin Island Official Flips to Clinton<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-17/sanders-quest-for-superdelegates-loses-one-after-virgin-island-official-flips-to-clintonhttp:/www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-17/sanders-quest-for-superdelegates-loses-one-after-virgin-island-official-flips-to-clinton>

BLOOMBERG // JENNIFER EPSTEIN

Bernie Sanders is trying to persuade Democratic Party superdelegates backing Hillary Clinton to flip their allegiance as a last-ditch bid for the nomination, but one Sanders supporter is going the other way. Emmett Hansen II, the Democratic National Committeeman for the U.S. Virgin Islands, decided to shift his support to Clinton after a weekend briefing on her plans for U.S. territories that followed months of dissatisfaction with Sanders’ lack of concrete positions. His reasons go right to the heart of Clinton's critique of the Sanders campaign. Hansen said that while he’s a believer in sweeping change, he also wants to get things done. “There are no more windmills to joust against and no more mountains to climb,” said Hansen, a native of St. Croix who was on the Sanders campaign's list of publicly committed superdelegate supporters. “It comes down to one thing: what’s best for the Virgin Islands, to be fully incorporated into the United States.”

Clinton, Democrats Confronting Dangerous Divisions Within Party<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-18/clinton-democrats-confronting-dangerous-divisions-within-party>

BLOOMBERG // MARGARET TALEV

Hillary Clinton’s claim of a narrow victory in Kentucky and Bernie Sanders’s win in Oregon illustrated a deepening rift among Democrats with the potential to hobble the party heading into the general election. The split outcome in Tuesday’s primaries gives Clinton little leverage to push Sanders to unify his supporters behind her in preparation for an expected campaign against presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, who is using the extended primary contest to attack Clinton’s standing with her own party. Sanders showed no intention of dialing back his fight against Clinton or urging his supporters to fall in line. His spokesman said Sanders is considering seeking a recount in Kentucky, where Clinton was clinging to a lead of a half percentage point. "We are in until the last ballot is cast," Sanders told supporters at a rally in Carson, California, saying he believes he can win the June 7 primary in the nation’s most populous state. "We have the possibility -- it will be a steep climb, I recognize that -- but we have the possibility of going to Philadelphia with the majority of the pledged delegates," Sanders said of the July nominating convention. He said in early general election poll match-ups he does "much better against Trump" than Clinton.

Sanders sticks it to the Democratic Party<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/bernie-sanders-democratic-party-223280>

POLITICO // DANIEL STRAUSS

In the wake of a chaotic state convention that resulted in death threats for party officials and vandalism to party headquarters, the Democratic establishment asked Bernie Sanders for his help Tuesday in getting some of his overzealous supporters to stand down. His response: Stick it. As fallout from Saturday’s Nevada Democratic convention expanded across Democratic circles, the Vermont senator’s defiance appeared to confirm some of the party’s worst fears: The rifts caused by the presidential primary may be deeper than anyone knew. The level of vitriol generated by the convention outcome — in which Sanders backers erupted in fury over Hillary Clinton’s delegate win there — and Sanders’ reaction to those pointing the finger at his supporters are suddenly raising doubts about the party’s ability to quickly unite after its long slog of a primary. "The perception that the DNC and other state parties have unfairly favored Hillary Clinton is going to make the reconciliation of Sanders and Clinton supporters nationally and in the states far harder," said Democratic strategist Simon Rosenberg, president of the NDN think tank. "The DNC should have tried much harder to address this perception early on, as it always had the potential to become a reason for Sanders partisans to question the legitimacy of Clinton's victory."

Bernie Sanders under fire after Nevada convention chaos<http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-under-fire-after-nevada-convention-chaos>

MSNBC // ALEX SEITZ-WALD

Bernie Sanders is remaining defiant in the face of calls from Democratic leaders to condemn unrest fomented by his supporters follow the Nevada Democratic State convention Saturday night — doing little to cool the passions of some of his supporters and prompting concerns of a fractured national convention this summer. Sanders supporters threw chairs, started fights, and booed officials, including a top Sanders surrogate, at the convention in Las Vegas, which was the final step in allocating Nevada’s delegates to the Democratic National Convention. The supporters felt the party had conspired against them to tip the scales in favor of Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton. After the convention, the party’s headquarters were vandalized with pro-Sanders graffiti and the chairwoman of the party received threatening text messages, phone calls, and social media posts. All this over very low stakes — just two pledged delegates out of more than 4,000 total Democratic delegates. “I’ve got, threats to my family, to my grandson, to my husband,” chairwoman Roberta Lang told MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Tuesday. “They have attacked my workplace and they have said very awful things.” The chaos in Nevada has Democrats across the country worried about the national convention in July, which Sanders’ campaign has threatened to disrupt if they are not treated in a way they consider to be fair. State Democratic Party chairs are meeting in Philadelphia, the site of the national convention, later this week for their quarterly meeting and the issue is sure to come up.

Bernie Sanders, Democratic establishment battle boils over<http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/17/politics/bernie-sanders-democratic-establishment-battle-boils-over/>

CNN // CHRIS MOODY

It was really just a matter of time. With the Democratic presidential primary in its twilight, frustration within the ranks over the party's handling of the primary process spilled out this week as Bernie Sanders supporters lashed out at party leaders, arguing that their candidate has been treated unfairly. The public outpouring of anger began last weekend at the Nevada Democratic Party convention, where Sanders supporters who said Hillary Clinton's backers had subverted party rules shouted down pro-Clinton speakers and sent threatening messages to state party Chairwoman Roberta Lange after posting her phone number and address on social media. That led Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and other top party leaders to demand an apology and publicly ruminate on the possibility of violence at the Democratic National Convention in July as they prepare for a general election battle with Donald Trump. The Sanders campaign condemned unruly behavior from supporters and those who made threats to party leaders, but it is sticking with its stance that the party is subverting the process in a way that benefits Clinton.

Nevada Democratic Convention Shows Consequences of Willful Ignorance<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-normoyle/nevada-democratic-convent_b_9998018.html>

HUFFINGTON POST // BRIAN NORMOYLE
The state Democratic convention in Nevada Saturday devolved into a chaotic demonstration of party division and the emotional theatrics of candidate-centered movements. 64 Sanders delegates weren’t seated because they either weren’t registered Democrats by May 1 or hadn’t provided basic identifying information. Eight Clinton delegates were rejected for the same reasons. Six of the rejected Sanders delegates were eventually credentialed after providing the required information. But, of course, in heeding the call to revolution, an outspoken block of Sanders supporters viewed a straightforward and non-controversial rejection of unqualified delegates as a plot to rig the process. They took to the convention floor in fury, booing Barbara Boxer (Really? Barbara Boxer?!), with at least one person calling her a “bitch,” after she called for unity moving forward in the election. That fulmination reached the point where the security director of the hotel said he could no longer handle the event, already hours behind schedule, and he shut it down. As one would expect, when they refused to leave, police told them they had to. There were 12 national delegates up for grabs at this state convention. Clinton was awarded seven, Sanders five. All of this agitation over a net gain of exactly two delegates for the candidate that won the state by over 5% in February.

Sanders condemns Nevada convention violence but refuses to apologize<http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/17/nevada-democrats-bernie-sanders-violence>

THE GUARDIAN // LAUREN GAMBINO

Bernie Sanders condemned “any and all forms of violence” on Tuesday but refused to apologize for the unrest at the Nevada Democratic convention this weekend, during which some of his supporters threw chairs and personally threatened the state party’s chairwoman. “Within the last few days, there have been a number of criticisms made against my campaign organization,” the leftwing presidential candidate said in a statement. “Party leaders in Nevada, for example, claim that the Sanders campaign has a ‘penchant for violence’. That is nonsense. “Our campaign has held giant rallies all across this country, including in high-crime areas, and there have been zero reports of violence. Our campaign of course believes in non-violent change and it goes without saying that I condemn any and all forms of violence, including the personal harassment of individuals. “But, when we speak of violence, I should add here that months ago, during the Nevada campaign, shots were fired into my campaign office in Nevada and an apartment housing complex my campaign staff lived in was broken into and ransacked.”

Bill and Hillary Clinton Have Earned $6.7 Million From Speeches in Past 16 Months<http://www.wsj.com/articles/bill-and-hillary-clinton-have-earned-6-7-million-from-speeches-in-past-16-months-1463539762>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // RICHARD RUBIN
Bill and Hillary Clinton have earned $6.7 million from paid speeches since the beginning of 2015, including $2.7 million from speeches the former president gave after his wife officially kicked off her White House bid last April, according to a financial-disclosure form Mrs. Clinton’s campaign released on Tuesday. Mr. Clinton was paid $285,000 to speak to America’s Health Insurance Plans, the trade association for health insurers, in June 2015. He was paid $200,000 to speak at Stephens Inc., an Arkansas financial-services firm run by Warren Stephens, a major Republican donor. And in September 2015, he was paid $225,000 to speak to Computer Design & Integration LLC, a New Jersey information technology firm. Mrs. Clinton stopped giving paid speeches when she started her 2016 campaign, and Mr. Clinton hasn’t given any since a November 2015 event in Toronto, according to the form. He has said he didn’t think he would continue to give paid speeches if Mrs. Clinton became president. In addition to the speech income, Mrs. Clinton received more than $5 million in book royalties since the beginning of 2015, and Mr. Clinton was paid by the Varkey GEMS Foundation, an education charity, and Laureate Education Inc., a for-profit company. Mr. Clinton isn’t required to reveal his exact earnings from that consulting work. The couple hasn’t yet released their 2015 tax returns, though they have released decades of past returns.

Hillary Clinton's joyless victory<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/hillary-clinton-kentucky-joyless-victory-223310>

POLITICO // GABRIEL DEBENEDETTI

Hillary Clinton’s supporters breathed a heavy sigh of relief on Tuesday night when news finally landed that she eked out a win over Bernie Sanders in Kentucky. It’s not that she needed the delegates. The result simply ensured that the likely Democratic nominee wouldn’t lose the two states voting Tuesday, which would have opened her up to weeks of second-guessing and nit-picking from Democrats concerned about her inability to put Sanders away. But Clinton’s narrow Kentucky win — her lone state victory in the month of May, and one that ensured she wouldn't go five weeks without winning a state — is a temporary comfort. It was paired with a loss in Oregon during a week when Sanders supporters appeared more emboldened and committed than ever, despite the senator’s all-but-impossible path to the nomination. And there are few signs that the party is ready to fully unite behind its frontrunner: In the wake of Nevada’s chaotic state Democratic convention Saturday and the ensuing sniping between the Sanders camp and the Democratic establishment, the prospect of a messy national convention in July is no longer unthinkable.

Hillary Clinton’s viral nightmare: A video of her ‘lying for 13 minutes’<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/hillary-clintons-viral-nightmare-a-video-of-her-lying-for-13-minutes/2016/05/17/ea59e32c-1c66-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // KATHLEEN PARKER

You could say that it all depends on how you define “lie.” Or, perhaps, that it’s hell to have a public record. Either way, Hillary Clinton’s vast résumé of, shall we say, inconsistencies, is the dog that caught the car and won’t let go. A viral video collection of her comments on various subjects through the years is bestirring Republican hearts. To those who’d rather vote for a reality show host than a Clinton, the video merely confirms what they’ve believed all along. For independents and even Democrats, it’s a reminder of how often Clinton has morphed into a fresh incarnation as required by the political moment. Most of the highlights will be familiar to anyone who follows politics — her varying takes on Bosnia, health care, Wall Street, NAFTA — but the juxtaposition of these ever-shifting views is more jarring than one might expect. Politicians count on Americans’ short attention spans (and memories) as much as they do their own policies and/or charms. This video , inartfully titled “Hillary Clinton lying for 13 minutes straight,” clarifies blurred recollections and recasts them in an order that, among other things, reminds us how long the Clintons have been around.

Clinton campaign wrestles with how to attack Trump<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/hillary-clinton-narrative-trump-223305>

POLITICO // ANNIE KARNI

Donald Trump is a train wreck. He’d be an utter disaster for women voters. Latinos would be crushed under his rich-get-richer tax plan. His refusal to release his tax returns implies he’s not worth the $10 billion he claims he is. He could start a nuclear arms race and equip terrorists with weapons to destroy the United States. Even Republicans don’t want him. He’s a “loose cannon,” unpredictable and just “too risky” to be president. Those were just a few of the opening salvos in the Hillary Clinton campaign's initial attempts to define the presumptive Republican nominee. In the early days of the Clinton-Trump showdown, there’s been no shortage of attack lines, or campaign surrogates eager to deliver them. But a potential obstacle is already emerging, one that 16 Republicans failed to overcome this year — creating a coherent narrative to define a candidate who seems to blunder from one negative headline to the next with no permanent scars to show for it. “Our problem is a target-rich environment,” said one Clinton ally, who noted that every day this week the news cycle was dominated by seemingly damaging headlines about Trump. “Right now they’re doing a little bit of everything, to see what works,” explained President Obama’s former senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer, noting that the stakes are low because the campaign has yet to put any money behind its attacks. But the central challenge, he said, has already been revealed: maintaining message discipline at the negative headline buffet that is Trump.

Does Bernie Sanders want to be the Ralph Nader of 2016?<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/does-bernie-sanders-want-to-be-the-ralph-nader-of-2016/2016/05/17/b091d75a-1c5f-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // DANA MILBANK

Let’s examine what Bernie Sanders supporters did in his name over the weekend. As the Nevada Democratic convention voted to award a majority of delegates to Hillary Clinton — an accurate reflection of her victory in the state’s February caucuses — Sanders backers charged the stage, threw chairs and shouted vulgar epithets at speakers. Security agents had to protect the dais and ultimately clear the room. Sanders supporters publicized the cellphone number of the party chairwoman, Roberta Lange, resulting in thousands of abusive text messages and threats: “Praying to God someone shoots you in the FACE and blows your democracy-stealing head off!” “Hey bitch. . . We know where you live. Where you work. Where you eat. Where your kids go to school/grandkids. . . Prepare for hell.” Veteran Nevada reporter Jon Ralston transcribed some of the choice voicemail messages for the chairwoman, some with vulgar labels for women and their anatomy: “I think people like you should be hung in a public execution. . . . You are a sick, twisted piece of s--- and I hope you burn for this!” “You f---ing stupid bitch! What the hell are you doing? You’re a f---ing corrupt bitch!” The day after the convention, Sanders supporters vandalized party headquarters with messages saying, among other things, “you are scum.” And the candidate’s response to the violent and misogynistic behavior of his backers? Mostly defiance. Asked by reporters Tuesday about the convention chaos — in which operatives from his national campaign participated — Sanders walked away in the middle of the question.

2016 Republican

Trump Says He Will Release Policy Plan to Dismantle Nearly All of Dodd-Frank<http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-says-he-will-release-policy-plan-to-dismantle-nearly-all-of-dodd-frank-1463523072>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // KATE DAVIDSON

Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, said he intends to release a detailed economic policy platform in two weeks that would dismantle nearly all of the 2010 Dodd-Frank law, he said in an interview Tuesday with Reuters. “I would say it’ll be close to a dismantling of Dodd-Frank,” Mr. Trump said, according to the Reuters report. “Dodd-Frank is a very negative force, which has developed a very bad name.” Mr. Trump also said he is “not an enemy” of current Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen, although he reiterated he eventually wants a Republican to lead the U.S. central bank. “I’m not a person that thinks Janet Yellen is doing a bad job,” he added. “I happen to be a low-interest rate person unless inflation rears its ugly head, which can happen at some point,” he said, while acknowledging inflation “doesn’t seem like it’s happening any time soon.”

Trump preparing plan to dismantle Obama's Wall Street reform law<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-banks-idUSKCN0Y900J>

REUTERS // EMILY FLITTER AND STEVE HOLLAND

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said on Tuesday that sweeping financial reforms put in place under President Barack Obama were harming the economy and he would dismantle nearly all of them. Trump told Reuters in an interview that he would release a plan in about two weeks for overhauling the 2010 financial regulatory law known as Dodd-Frank. "Dodd-Frank has made it impossible for bankers to function," the presumptive Republican nominee said. "It makes it very hard for bankers to loan money for people to create jobs, for people with businesses to create jobs. And that has to stop." Pressed on the extent of the changes he wanted to make, Trump said, "it will be close to dismantling of Dodd-Frank." Reacting on Twitter to Trump's comment, Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton called it a "reckless idea" that would "leave middle-class families out to dry."

Trump tells Reuters that as president, he would talk to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/17/trump-tells-reuters-that-as-president-he-would-talk-to-north-korean-leader-kim-jong-un/>

WASHINGTON POST // SEAN SULLIVAN

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said in a wire service interview published Tuesday that as president, he would be willing to talk with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. In an interview with Reuters, Trump said that he would not have an issue with speaking to Kim in order to stop North Korea's nuclear program. "I would speak to him, I would have no problem speaking to him," Trump said of Kim, according to Reuters. He said he would also "put a lot of pressure on China," which maintains formal relations with North Korea. The United States and North Korea do not have formal diplomatic ties. U.S. political figures across party lines have been critical of North Korea's human rights record, its nuclear program and the aggressive posture it has taken toward the United States.

Donald Trump Says He’s Willing to Talk Directly With Kim Jong-un<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/us/politics/kim-jong-un-donald-trump.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // ALAN RAPPEPPORT

Donald J. Trump proposed another significant shift in American foreign policy on Tuesday, suggesting that as president he would be willing to hold direct negotiations with Kim Jong-un, the North Korean dictator. In an interview with Reuters, Mr. Trump said that the talks would be part of an effort to halt North Korea’s nuclear program, which the United States considers one of the most serious national security threats. “I would speak to him, I would have no problem speaking to him,” Mr. Trump said. North Korea is among the most isolated countries in the world and regularly defies the international community by launching test rockets and capturing political prisoners.

Trump Claims Income of More Than $557 Million on Disclosure<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-17/trump-claims-income-of-more-than-557-million-on-disclosure>

BLOOMBERG // LYNNLEY BROWNING

Donald Trump claimed income of more than $557 million over the last year, though the campaign provided few details on the sources of the money. The presumptive Republican presidential nominee made the assertion on his income in a news release on Tuesday to announce that he had filed his required annual financial disclosure with the Federal Election Commission. But the campaign didn’t release the document. Trump, a billionaire with interests in real estate, golf resorts and licensing, has campaigned on his business acumen while facing repeated questions about his income, net worth and taxes. Unlike other candidates, he has declined to release his tax returns, saying he will do so after the Internal Revenue Service completes an audit. IRS officials have said there’s no reason taxpayers can’t make their returns public, even during audits.

Donald Trump does not apologize for anything — even things he seems to regret<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/17/donald-trump-does-not-apologize-for-anything-even-things-he-seems-to-regret/>

WASHINGTON POST // JENNA JOHNSON

Towards the end of a journalistic interview that often felt more like a reality television dating show, Megyn Kelly of Fox News confronted the likely Republican nominee about using the word "bimbo" in tweets about her. "Uhhh, well, that was a retweet, yeah," Donald Trump said in an interview televised on Tuesday night. "Did I say that?" "Many times," Kelly responded. "Oouf, okay," Trump said. And then: "Excuse me." Then came an awkward laugh from the candidate. Kelly tried to ask another question, but Trump cut in with a defense of his actions.

Hispanic evangelical leader warns: No guarantee Donald Trump’s video message will air at his conference<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/17/hispanic-evangelical-leader-warns-no-guarantee-donald-trumps-video-message-will-air-at-his-conference/>

WASHINGTON POST // ED O’KEEFE

Presumed Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is sending a videotaped message to be played at an annual conference of the nation's largest Hispanic evangelical group. But there's no guarantee that the message will be aired. Samuel Rodriguez, leader of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, said late Tuesday that he will only air the presidential candidate's video greeting if he thinks it's conciliatory and respectful to Latinos and the nation's immigrant community. "I will personally get the video and scrutinize it, of course," Rodriguez said in a phone interview.

Donald Trump faces June deposition in restaurant lawsuit<http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/05/trump-faces-june-deposition-in-restaurant-case-223297>

POLITICO // JOSH GERSTEIN

Expected Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump appears likely to be forced off the campaign trail in June to be deposed under oath in at least one of two lawsuits he filed after prominent chefs backed away from plans to open restaurants at the luxury Trump International Hotel under development in Washington. A D.C. Superior Court judge approved a plan Tuesday to briefly extend court deadlines to allow Trump to give testimony June 16 in the case Trump's development company filed against a firm set up by restaurateur Geoffrey Zakarian to open a dining establishment called "The National." The lawsuits against Zakarian's company and another created by chef Jose Andres were filed last August after the chefs said anti-immigrant remarks by Trump on the campaign trail made the planned restaurants unviable.

Donald Trump and Megyn Kelly Are Convivial in Prime-Time Special<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/us/politics/donald-trump-megyn-kelly-fox.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // JOHN KOBLIN

Donald J. Trump and Megyn Kelly finally talked on Tuesday night about their raucous, contentious history over the last nine months. And it appears that things are all patched up. “I like our relationship right now,” Mr. Trump said in the interview. It was a convivial, easygoing interview that was taped more than two weeks ago for Ms. Kelly’s first prime-time special on Fox, “Megyn Kelly Presents.” Ms. Kelly has not been shy about the purpose of the special: With Barbara Walters retired, she has said that she hopes to fill the vacuum of the prime-time host conducting the must-watch interview. Fox increased the exposure by presenting the show on its broadcast network, not the Fox News cable network, on which Ms. Kelly appears on weeknights.

Donald Trump, Republicans Finalize Joint Fundraising Deal<http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-republicans-finalize-joint-fundraising-deal-1463537455>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // REBECCA BALLHAUS

Donald Trump and the Republican National Committee finalized a joint fundraising agreement late Tuesday that would allow individual donors to write checks of as much as $449,400—far higher than the $2,700 cap on what the presumptive GOP nominee’s presidential campaign can accept. Under the agreement, Mr. Trump’s campaign and the RNC will raise money for two joint fundraising committees. The first, called Trump Victory, will raise money for the RNC, the campaign and 11 state party committees. The second, called Trump Make America Great Again Committee, will direct funds only to the RNC and the Trump campaign. Mr. Trump said earlier this month that he would set up a joint fundraising committee and begin actively raising money for the general election, after largely self-funding his primary campaign. The general-election campaign is expected to cost more than $1 billion. Raising money jointly with the party allows Mr. Trump to raise funds more efficiently. Instead of finding a broader base of donors to write checks of up to $2,700, he can tap a smaller set of wealthy donors for larger checks. But the joint fundraising committees are also limited in what they can transfer to his campaign and spend on his behalf.

Trump creating committees to raise big money for GOP<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-republican-fundraising-223250>

POLITICO // ALEX ISENSTADT AND KENNETH VOGEL

Donald Trump, facing calls to mend the rift he created in the Republican Party, is putting the final touches on two separate fundraising committees that will allow him to solicit massive checks to help the GOP candidates with whom he’ll share the November ballot, according to three sources familiar with the plans. Trump’s presidential campaign is poised to form a joint fundraising committee with the Republican National Committee and at least 10 state parties, according to the sources. If such a committee were to accept maximum donations for the general election funds of each of its component committees — $2,700 for the general election to Trump’s campaign, $33,400 to the RNC and $10,000 to each of the state parties — the total would come to $136,100 per person. Plans call for a second joint committee that would include the Trump campaign and the GOP’s two congressional campaign committees — the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee, said to the sources. If such a committee were to accept maximum donations for the general election funds of each of its component committees — $2,700 for the general election to Trump’s campaign and $33,400 each to the NRSC and the NRCC — the total would come to $69,500 per person.

Donald Trump and Republican Party Reach Fund-Raising Agreement<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/us/politics/rnc-trump-fundraising.html>

NEW YORK TIMES // MAGGIE HABERMAN

Donald J. Trump and the Republican National Committee announced on Tuesday night that they had forged a joint fund-raising agreement allowing donors to make contributions as large as $449,400, spread among the national committee and party committees in 11 states. The agreement is the product of weeks of negotiations and presents Mr. Trump with his first opportunity to collect large checks from donors as he faces the uphill climb of raising money in six months for a campaign that could realistically cost more than $1 billion. But the 11 states include only one swing state, Virginia. The structure is similar to the one created for Mitt Romney’s campaign in 2012: Mr. Romney’s home state, Democratic-leaning Massachusetts, was included in his agreement, while Mr. Trump has included New York, a state that he believes he can make competitive despite its heavy Democratic edge. Pennsylvania is not on the list, and neither is Ohio or Florida. The R.N.C.’s finance chairman, Lewis M. Eisenberg, will work with Mr. Trump’s national finance chairman, Steve Mnuchin, a former Goldman Sachs executive. In 2012, Mr. Romney and the R.N.C. raised nearly $77 million in May alone. Even with the higher limits, Mr. Trump may struggle to get there, and some of the funds that will be raised cannot be used for the campaign. His campaign can accept only $2,700 increments from each large check that comes in.

Megyn Kelly doesn't exactly grill Donald Trump<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-kelly-223303>

POLITICO // BEN SCHRECKINGER AND HADAS GOLD

Even Donald Trump’s innovation of live-tweeting his own interview couldn’t rescue his primetime network encounter with Megyn Kelly from its lack of substance. Nixon-Frost it was not, with Kelly serving up softball after softball in an encounter that was, for all the hype, ultimately unrevealing. The real star on screen was Kelly, who used the platform of her hour-long special to tease the November release of her book, which she promised would reveal the intimate details of her experience on the receiving end of Trump’s insults — a topic she nodded at but did not fully explore in the Fox special. For Kelly, the interview was one of her first real crossover tests. The Fox News anchor has repeatedly said in interviews her dream job lies somewhere along the lines of the gigs held by Charlie Rose, Oprah and Barbara Walters (the executive producer of the special had previously been Walters'). Whether her style will translate to the glossier world of primetime broadcast specials will be closely examined. But it's almost guaranteed to be a ratings hit regardless of what was said -- or wasn't.

Donald, Save Your Golf Greens, and the Planet<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/opinion/donald-save-your-golf-greens-and-the-planet.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Dear Donald, It’s been a while since we talked on the practice tee at Doral. (Nice course you built.) I am only going to do this once, but I am going to offer you some free advice — and it’s about all the things you love most: yourself, your kids, winning, money and golf. Have I got a deal for you …You see, Donald, I was looking at all the golf courses you own. Some of them are real gems, like Doral, Turnberry, Doonbeg, Palm Beach, Aberdeenshire. But you know what else I noticed? How many of them are on or near coastlines. And do you know what’s going to happen to those golf courses, Donald, if the climate scientists are even half right? They’re going to go from oceanfront property to ocean-floor property. Because ice melt and sea level rise are going to threaten all of them. Here’s a July 21, 2015, story from Weather.com: “As our seas continue to rise, some cities, like Miami, are planning to spend billions on revamping infrastructure. But some scientists say sea level rise will lead to another phenomenon in South Florida, and local leaders need to start preparing for it now. The region that’s home to thousands of high-priced homes nestled against the water is expected to be threatened directly by the rising seas in the coming decades, and when the harsh reality sets in, a mass exodus could commence.

Donald Trump: Stonewaller, shape-shifter, liar<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-stonewaller-shape-shifter-liar/2016/05/17/954129bc-1c49-11e6-9c81-4be1c14fb8c8_story.html>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // RUTH MARCUS

The past few weeks have offered Americans a chilling glimpse of three faces of Donald Trump: the stonewaller, the shape-shifter and the liar. Trump the stonewaller has been on display in his refusal to release his tax returns. “It’s none of your business,” Trump flatly told ABC News’s George Stephanopoulos when asked about his effective tax rate. Stephanopoulos: “Yes or no, do you believe voters have a right to see your tax returns before they make a final decision?” Trump: “I don’t think they do. But I do say this, I will really gladly give them.” Sure, he’d be happy to — except that he isn’t. And it is our business. Voters are entitled to know this information about a candidate for president, a person who would help steer the nation’s finances. For decades, presidential candidates have routinely made this material available. It is astonishing that Trump believes he is exempt from this norm — that a pending audit makes his returns less important to see, not more, or that he is not obliged to find some other way of providing the information, such as returns from earlier years or summary data for the years still under review.

Trump aides' rivalries plague super PACs<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-allies-rivalries-plagues-super-pacs-223300>

POLITICO // KENNETH P. VOGEL AND BEN SCHRECKINGER

The power struggle inside Donald Trump’s presidential campaign is spilling over into the world of his super PAC allies, freezing wealthy supporters who want to write big checks to boost the presumptive GOP nominee over likely Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton. Top Trump adviser Paul Manafort has privately expressed support for a yet-to-be-launched super PAC that would be affiliated with a close friend of the billionaire. Multiple sources familiar with the matter said Manafort’s allies hope the PAC will become the favored vehicle for huge checks from mega-donors like Las Vegas casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, who is believed to be considering spending as much as $100 million boosting Trump. But the sources said that Manafort’s chief internal rival, Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, who is close to Adelson’s advisers, is not on board with the plan for the new PAC. And they suggest that if Lewandowski doesn’t like the set-up, he may signal his support for a totally different outside spending vehicle — possibly one that hasn’t even been created yet.

Trump, Clinton tied in New Hampshire poll<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-clinton-tied-in-new-hampshire-poll-223289>

POLITICO // NICK GASS

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are running neck and neck in New Hampshire, according to the results of a WBUR poll surveying likely general election voters released Wednesday. Clinton earned 44 percent support, while Trump finished with 42 percent, giving the former secretary of state a slim advantage within the margin of error of more than 4 points. Neither candidate is particularly well liked in the state. A little more than one in three (35 percent) said they had a favorable opinion of Clinton, while 58 percent said their impression was unfavorable. For Trump, 33 percent said they had a favorable opinion of the presumptive Republican nominee compared to 58 percent who said they did not. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who still faces an uphill climb in catching Clinton in overall delegates, is seen favorably by 55 percent in the state bordering the one he represents, while 34 percent said they have an unfavorable view of him. And with Sanders as the Democratic nominee instead of Clinton, Trump loses by double digits—54 percent to 38 percent.

Amid Democratic infighting, polls are improving for Trump<http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/280283-amid-dem-infighting-polls-are-improving-for-trump>

THE HILL // NIALL STANAGE

Donald Trump appears to be making rapid progress in unifying Republican voters behind his presidential bid even as Democratic discord between backers of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders reaches new highs. An NBC News/SurveyMonkey poll released Tuesday morning showed Trump and Clinton performing at exactly the same level within their respective parties. Each commanded 87 percent support. The poll also suggested that hopes among Democrats of an easy win over Trump are misplaced. Tuesday’s poll had Clinton with an edge of just 3 points in a hypothetical match-up: The former secretary of State led Trump 48 percent to 45 percent. The numbers track close to polls near this point in the 2012 presidential election. A Gallup poll conducted in March 2012, for example, saw President Obama winning the allegiance of the same proportion of Democrats as Clinton is now: 87 percent. Trump, for his part, may be outperforming Mitt Romney, who took 84 percent support among Republicans in the March 2012 poll. To be sure, it’s early. Polling numbers at this point in an election cycle can be significantly out of line with the results in November.  But there are warning signs for Clinton, nonetheless.  While Romney, the Bush family and a few GOP officeholders are keeping a distance from Trump, the real estate mogul does not appear to have a huge disadvantage in seeking to unify Republican voters. That means Clinton will need to stoke enthusiasm among all parts of the Democratic base if she becomes the nominee.

Editorials/Op-Eds

NRC reform for a strong, safe nuclear power industry<http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/280292-nrc-reform-for-a-strong-safe-nuclear-power-industry>

THE HILL // ROBERT LATTA AND JERRY MCNERNEY

Nuclear energy has provided baseload power to our country for decades, and generates electricity twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. It does not emit carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, or nitrogen oxide, making it not only clean but reliable because power plants can run up to two years at a time before needing to go offline for refueling. One nuclear plant can power over 650,000 homes with clean and reliable energy. The 99 operating nuclear power reactors in 30 states throughout the United States generate about 20% of the nation's electricity. These plants have an impressive safety record, with strong regulation and oversight from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) including redundant safety systems to protect communities. As Congress continues to explore clean energy solutions, we should continue investing in technologies and research that will move our country forward.

A Bathroom of One’s Own?<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/opinion/a-bathroom-of-ones-own.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // PETER H. SCHUCK

Protecting the dignity of transgender Americans is a noble cause. Their equal access to housing, jobs, services and other social opportunities should be a legal right. Unfortunately, the “bathroom war” just begun by the Obama administration may actually impede this goal. In a letter sent last week to every public school in the country, the Department of Justice and the Department of Education relied on Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 to insist that transgender people be given access to bathrooms and many other facilities and activities corresponding to their chosen gender identity. Under the administration’s novel reading of the law, this is not a suggestion but an unequivocal legal right. The only value in play here is transgender people’s desire to affirm their gender identity during their few minutes of bathroom use. All other concerns — about privacy and modesty in a setting that most people consider almost as safe and intimate as their bedrooms — are beside the point. A legal right trumps any other non-right claim, and those who disobey may suffer serious sanctions.

When kids fire guns: Our view<http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/05/17/guns-children-our-view-editorials-debates/84502504/>

USA TODAY // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

Roughly five times a week in America, children accidentally shoot themselves or someone else. Just this past Saturday in Baton Rouge, for example, a 6-year-old boy was playing with a gun when he shot his 3-year-old sister. She survived, but the 5-year-old Detroit girl who found her grandmother’s gun under a pillow last week and shot herself in the neck did not. Nor did the 3-year-old in Dallas, Ga., who found his dad’s .380-caliber semiautomatic pistol on April 26 and shot himself in the chest. He was one of at least seven toddlers ages 1-3 who got their hands on guns in little more than a week in late April and shot themselves or someone else. Four of them killed themselves. One 2-year-old in Milwaukee killed his mother when he found a gun in the back seat of the car he was riding in and fired it.

Maryland blows away a hurdle for workers<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/maryland-blows-away-a-hurdle-for-workers/2016/05/17/fc61cb36-1c50-11e6-9c81-4be1c14fb8c8_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // EDITORIAL BOARD

Puns and quips abounded after the recent bill-signing ceremony in which Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) inked a measure that reduced licensing requirements for personnel at “blowout” salons, whose services are limited to washing and blow-drying hair, as opposed to cutting hair, as at a full-service salon. The bill itself acquired the nickname “license to blow,” and some openly wondered whether the patently close-cropped Mr. Hogan had enough personal experience to weigh in on the issue. Fun’s fun, and far be it from us to pour cold water on this hot topic. (Sorry.) But there is a serious reason to praise the new measure: It represents a modest but genuine step toward reform of occupational licensing rules that too often stand in the way of career progress for working Americans, and not only in Maryland. Last year, a White House report documented the startling fact that 1 in 4 U.S. workers need a license to do their jobs, a fivefold increase since the 1950s. Many licenses can be obtained only after spending many months, and thousands of dollars, on training — and paying stiff fees. These burdens weigh especially heavily on ex-offenders and members of military families, the report found.

Virginia lawmakers must clean up their act<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/virginia-lawmakers-must-clean-up-their-act/2016/05/17/633be7f4-1249-11e6-8967-7ac733c56f12_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // EDITORIAL BOARD

Virginia’s vacuum in public ethics was laid bare two years ago in the matter of former governor Robert F. McDonnell (R), who failed to break a single state law despite his sticky-palmed profligacy. The Supreme Court is now deliberating the question of whether his greed and poor judgment met the definition of bribery under federal corruption statutes. In the meantime, officials in Richmond are still wrestling with the concept of what constitutes a freebie — and, gee, does that really mean we can’t take those luxury-box tickets to see Washington’s NFL team? In three consecutive sessions of the state legislature, including the one that ended recently, lawmakers have done their best to tweak the rules to send the message that they take public ethics seriously — but not so seriously that all the bennies of elective office are eliminated. True, the post-McDonnell $100 limit on gifts from lobbyists seems to have been the death knell for those luxury hunting trips worth tens of thousands of dollars, courtesy of fat-cat influence peddlers, which the Senate majority leader, Thomas K. Norment Jr. (R-James City), once regarded as practically his birthright.

Paying for Years Lost Behind Bars<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/18/opinion/paying-for-years-lost-behind-bars.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // EDITORIAL BOARD

Glenn Ford served 30 years in Louisiana prisons — nearly all on death row — for a murder he did not commit. He was freed in 2014 but died in 2015 from lung cancer that had gone untreated while he was behind bars. Louisiana law provides for up to $330,000 in compensation to people who have been wrongfully imprisoned, but state courts have repeatedly denied Mr. Ford, and now his estate, even that inadequate amount. They say he could not prove he was innocent of a robbery that was connected to the murder for which he was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death, even though he was never charged with that robbery. A Louisiana lawmaker introduced a bill last month that would make it easier for people in Mr. Ford’s situation to recover money from the state, but it died in a House committee. The state’s recalcitrance in this case is reprehensible. Shortly before Mr. Ford’s death, even the prosecutor who sent Mr. Ford to prison apologized for his mistakes in a letter to the editor of The Shreveport Times. At least Louisiana has a compensation statute. Twenty states have no such laws, which means people who spent years or decades wrongfully imprisoned have to bring lawsuits if they want the government to pay for the wrong done to them. Very often, those suits fail because they require proof of official misconduct.