Subject: DNC Clips 5.19.2016
From: "Price, Jenna" <[email-masked]>
To: "Price, Jenna" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 04:30:38 -0700

WEATHER: 64F, Cloudy

POTUS and the Administration

An Undemocratic Vietnam Awaits Obama<http://www.wsj.com/articles/an-undemocratic-vietnam-awaits-obama-1463610918>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // STUART ROLLO

On Monday, May 23, President Obama is scheduled to make his first visit to Vietnam. It comes at a historic height in the U.S.-Vietnam relationship, largely as a result of mutual concerns over the rise of China. The Vietnamese government is eager to bolster economic and military ties with the U.S. and is actively lobbying to have the U.S. arms embargo, which was partially lifted in 2014, to allow for the purchase of surveillance equipment and patrol boats, be completely removed. This would make available a wider suite of American weapons platforms, such as missile systems, to strengthen Vietnam’s naval and coastal defense forces. This represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity for the U.S. to press for civil and human-rights reform in Vietnam. By making the closer ties desired by the Vietnamese government contingent upon such reform, the U.S. would demonstrate that its goodwill extends not only to a Vietnamese government willing to muscle up to an expansionist China, but also to the Vietnamese people in their continuing struggle for civil and political freedoms.

Donors to Obama Foundation have had private dinners at White House<http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/280448-donors-to-obama-foundation-had-private-dinners-at-white-house>

THE HILL // MEGAN WILSON

More than a dozen of the 39 named donors to the Obama Foundation have visited the White House for exclusive gatherings and events, according to a new report from the transparency group MapLight. The foundation was set up in 2014 to fund Obama’s presidential library in Chicago and surrounding endowment programs, and needs to raise up to $1 billion to reach its goals. The Obama Foundation has raised roughly $7.3 million since its inception, according to tax forms, and 15 of the 39 named donors have received invitations to small meetings with the president. In fact, every donor whose family or foundation had given more than $100,000 met with Obama at the White House, according to the review by MapLight, a non-profit research organization that tracks money in politics. The group looked at White House visitor records, the foundation’s website and its tax returns.

Biden: Brown 'great choice' for Clinton VP<http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/280427-biden-sherrod-brown-great-choice-for-clinton-vp>

THE HILL // JORDAIN CARNEY

Vice President Biden on Wednesday weighed in on speculation about who could be his successor but stopped short of endorsing a particular choice. Asked what he thought about Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) for Demoratic front-runner Hillary Clinton's vice president pick, Biden told reporters he would be a "great choice." "But there's a lot of really qualified folks for number two," he added, according to the White House pool report. "Hillary has a plethora of really good people to pick from, for real." Brown is one of handful of senators on Clinton's shortlist for the vice presidential spot. Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine (Va.), Mark Warner (Va.) and Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) are also considered potential picks. Brown has repeatedly denied interest in the position, recently telling MSNBC, "My interest all along has been to stay in the Senate and fight for the issues.

Biden, Sen. Brown tout overtime new rule in Ohio visit<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/05/18/biden-sen-brown-tout-overtime-new-rule-ohio-visit/84565656/>

USA TODAY // DEIRDRE SHESGREEN

Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Sherrod Brown whirled into Ohio’s capital city Wednesday for back-to-back policy and political stops —trumpeting a new policy to expand overtime pay and boosting Democrats’ 2016 electoral prospects in this pivotal battleground state. The official part of the trip unfolded at Jeni’s Splendid Ice Cream in Columbus, and it centered on a new rule aimed at boosting income for millions of American workers by expanding eligibility for overtime pay. The rule will make executive, administrative and professional employees earning less than $47,476 eligible for overtime pay if they put in more than 40 hours a week. The current threshold is $23,660, so any salaried worker who earns more than that can be forced to work longer hours without additional compensation.

Biden says there is no ‘fundamental split’ among Democrats; expects unity.<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/18/biden-says-there-is-no-fundamental-split-among-democrats-expects-unity/>

WASHINGTON POST // PAUL KANE

Vice President Biden defended Sen. Bernie Sanders's right to carry on his presidential campaign against Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton on Wednesday, but called on the Vermont socialist to be "more aggressive" in denouncing the behavior of his supporters after a raucous party convention in Las Vegas over the weekend. In Ohio to promote a new labor regulation and campaign with Senate candidate Ted Strickland, Biden told reporters after his last stop in the state capital that he believed Democrats would come together after the last primaries in June and that Sanders would forcefully back Clinton. "I'm confident that Bernie will be supportive if Hillary wins, which the numbers indicate will happen," Biden said. Despite signs of increasing acrimony from Sanders supporters, the vice president said he believes that the prospect of presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump was enough to bring the party together.

Selling Merrick Garland<http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/05/garland-supreme-court-senate/483414/>

THE ATLANTIC // NORA KELLY

Senate Democrats want to make sure the public gets to know Judge Merrick Garland, even if their Republican colleagues aren’t planning to proceed with his Supreme Court nomination. But as the likelihood of changing Republican hearts and minds diminishes, the senators’ maneuvering increasingly seems like pre-election messaging to voters: If you’re satisfied with Republicans holding up Garland’s nomination, so be it. If you aren’t, vote Democrat. There is little to no doubt that Senate Democrats believe Garland is a very qualified jurist, and obviously the leader of their party, President Obama—who nominated the D.C. Circuit chief judge in March—thinks so, too. But they have also worked the political angles at play: From press conferences, to long Senate-floor speeches, to a forum they held Wednesday, senators have woven together praise for Garland as a nominee with condemnations of Republican obstructionism. And where they previously focused on the Senate fulfilling its constitutional duty, lately they seem more eager to target public interest.

Obama wants to hear what children have to say about science education<https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/obama-wants-to-hear-what-children-have-to-say-about-science-education/2016/05/18/6290f1ba-1d38-11e6-8c7b-6931e66333e7_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // MORIAH BALLINGIT
Jacob Leggette said he believes it is important that children have a say in their science education. That’s why the 9-year-old budding engineer from Baltimore fearlessly approached President Obama at the White House Science Fair and asked: “Do you have a child science adviser?” Obama does not have a child science adviser, but in a speech at the fair last month, he indicated that he was taking Jacob’s idea to heart. “Jacob . . . had a very good idea,” Obama said, after lauding his project, a collection of items he built on a 3-D printer. “We should have a kid’s advisory group that starts explaining to us what’s interesting to them and what’s working, and could help us shape advances in STEM education.” Inspired by Jacob’s idea, the White House created a Web page to allow children to share their thoughts and views on science, technology, engineering and math education. The site is set to go live Thursday at WH.gov/KidScienceAdvisors.

Obama order targets atrocities — but gives little new power to stop them<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/05/18/obama-order-targets-atrocities-but-gives-little-new-power-stop-them/84573686/>

USA TODAY // GREGORY KORTE

President Obama signed an executive order to detect and prevent mass atrocities Wednesday, proclaiming that the prevention of atrocities is a "core national security interest of the United States." But the executive order doesn't lay out any policy changes or give the give the government any explicit new power. Instead, it mostly makes permanent an Atrocities Prevention Board that's already existed for four years. "We’re making sure that the United States government has the structures, the mechanisms to better prevent and respond to mass atrocities," Obama said in 2012, heralding the first meeting of the board at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. The board is designed to be a sort of early-warning system, alerting senior U.S. policymakers about a pending atrocity while there's still time to do something about it. Obama established the board through a rare form of executive action called a Presidential Study Directive. Wednesday's action converted that directive into a formal executive order, giving it the force of law and ensuring it continues into the next administration unless officially revoked by the future president.

Study predicts modest economic boost for U.S. from Obama trade pact<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/study-predicts-modest-economic-boost-for-us-from-obama-trade-pact/2016/05/18/4382358e-1d3f-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // DAVID NAKAMURA

The world’s largest regional trade pact, between the United States and 11 Pacific Rim nations, would marginally boost the U.S. economy and jobs over the next 15 years, but it also would erode employment in manufacturing sectors, according to a new analysis by an independent commission. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is expected to boost the nation’s gross domestic product by nearly $43 billion by 2032 and create an estimated 128,000 additional jobs, the U.S. International Trade Commission concluded in an 800-page report released Wednesday. Those increases would be measured against current baseline projections if the agreement is not enacted. At the same time, the commission concluded that the TPP could cause a 0.2 percent decline in manufacturing jobs when compared with projections without TPP enactment, a finding that is likely to be seized on by labor unions and other opponents of the accord. Overall, the trade deal “would have positive effects, albeit small as a percentage of the overall size of the U.S. economy,” the commission wrote in its report.

Coal war intensifies with Obama review<http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/280442-coal-war-intensifies-with-obama-review>

THE HILL // DEVIN HENRY

Miners and Western Republicans are lining up against the Obama administration and environmentalists in what some consider the next front in the “war on coal.” Interior Secretary Sally Jewell announced a three-year moratorium on new coal leases on public lands in January, launching a review that could potentially result in mining companies paying  higher rates. “It fits tidily into their overall view of coal,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), the chairwoman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. “You can call it a ‘war on coal,’ you can call it whatever you want. It is a policy directive coming out of this administration that says coal has no part in our country’s energy portfolio. I think that’s short-sighted and very unfortunate.” Administration officials held the first public meeting on the review on Tuesday in Wyoming, with four more to follow.  The review is moving ahead at a time when coal has become a flashpoint in the presidential race. Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump is running on a platform of undoing Obama-era environmental regulations and has promised coal-state lawmakers he will do what he can to help prop up the commodity.

Democrats

Dems to Obama: 'Stop the deportations'<http://thehill.com/latino/280434-dems-to-obama-stop-the-deportations>

THE HILL // MIKE LILLIS

House liberals intensified their criticisms of President Obama's deportation policies on Wednesday, urging the administration to scrap enforcement guidelines that target new arrivals and focus solely on criminals. Appearing on Capitol Hill with several dozen Central American asylum seekers, the Democrats hammered the Department of Homeland Security's ongoing operations targeting women and children, saying even those who've been denied refugee status should be allowed to remain in the country. The lawmakers warned that sending those families back to the so-called Northern Triangle countries of Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala — among the most violent regions in the world — would put them in harm’s way. Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Calif.) called the deportations "cruel and misguided." "The removal operations … do not live up to our American values or our time-honored tradition of offering refuge to those fleeing violence and brutality in their own country," she said.

Senate Dems hold mock Supreme Court hearing<http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/280421-senate-dems-hold-mock-supreme-court-hearing>

THE HILL // JORDAIN CARNEY

Senate Democrats seeking to keep the spotlight on President Obama's stalled Supreme Court nominee held a mock hearing for Merrick Garland on Wednesday. Democrats on the Judiciary Committee lavished praise on Garland, while the judge's supporters described him as a "fair" jurist who was "highly-qualified" to serve on the court. "Judge Garland posses an unbelievably sharp analytical mind," said Justin Driver, who previously clerked for Garland on the D.C. Circuit. "He is, as many people have said, a judge's judge." Democratic senators have slammed Republicans for not giving Garland a hearing. Republicans say the next president should pick deceased Justice Antonin Scalia's successor. Democrats argue that Republicans are blocking Americans from being able to hear from Garland. Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.), who is expected to be the next Senate Democratic leader, told Driver and the three other witnesses that "what you're doing is allowing the public to see...just what a fine jurist he is, what a fine judge he is and what a fine individual he is."

Dem group buys $10 million in ads in race to unseat Rob Portman<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/ohio-majority-pac-rob-portman-223339>

POLITICO // BURGRESS EVERETT

A key Democratic outside group is reserving nearly $10 million for election ads in the battleground state of Ohio, hoping to overcome a massive spending spree by GOP Sen. Rob Portman. Senate Majority PAC is reserving $9.5 million in airtime aimed at ousting Portman and aiding Democrat Ted Strickland, pushing the total money committed there to more than $50 million. The group, affiliated with Democratic leadership, has already spent $1.8 million attacking Portman for exporting U.S. jobs from Ohio and for being a D.C. insider. In a statement, Senate Majority PAC spokesman Shripal Shah said the ad campaign will continue the same theme. “As a 30-year Washington insider, Rob Portman has spent his career going to bat for corporations that ship jobs overseas and big banks on Wall Street — all at the expense of people across Ohio,” Shah said. “We are going to make sure Ohio voters know the truth about his record; they deserve better than a Senator who only works for special interests.”

Inside Harry Reid’s hands-off approach to Bernie Sanders<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/05/19/inside-harry-reids-hands-off-approach-to-bernie-sanders/>

WASHINGTON POST // MIKE DEBONIS

By all rights, Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) should be at open war with his colleague Bernie Sanders right now. Saturday’s Nevada Democratic Convention in Las Vegas, on Reid’s home turf and run by the state party Reid effectively dominates, devolved into a fiasco of chants, boos and thrown chairs thanks to aggrieved supporters of Sanders’ presidential campaign — even after Reid prevailed on Sanders (Vt.) to release a statement beforehand calling for respect and calm. Then, after Sanders remained silent Sunday and Monday on the Nevada ruckus, Reid told reporters Tuesday that Sanders personally told him he condemned the unrest and was “confident he will be saying something about it soon” — only to be confronted an hour later with a lengthy statement from Sanders that spent more time detailing grievances against Nevada party officials than denouncing the disruptions and verbal threats of his supporters. But Reid — the former amateur boxer who relishes political confrontation and recently fundraised off his dressing-down of a fellow Democrat — has given so far Sanders the kid-gloves treatment.

Congress poised to pass sweeping reform of chemical law<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congress-poised-to-pass-sweeping-reform-of-chemical-law/2016/05/18/0da5cd22-1d30-11e6-9c81-4be1c14fb8c8_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // JULIET EILPERIN AND DARRYL FEARS

Congress is on the cusp of passing the most sweeping overhaul of U.S. chemical safety laws in 40 years, a rare bipartisan accord that has won the backing of both industry officials and some of the Hill’s most liberal lawmakers. The Toxic Substances Control Act, which has not been reauthorized since President Gerald Ford signed it into law in 1976, regulates thousands of chemicals in everyday products including detergents and flame retardants. It has come under sharp criticism as ineffective from all quarters, including environmentalists who back stronger federal oversight and chemical companies that are now subject to a patchwork of more stringent rules in some states. The compromise lawmakers were working to finalize Wednesday night will provide the industry with greater certainty while empowering the Environmental Protection Agency to obtain more information about a chemical before sanctioning its use. While some environmental groups have opted to remain neutral or have faulted the final details, the measure has the tacit approval of the Obama administration and the top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.).

Ed Rendell apologizes for ‘ugly women’ remarks in Washington Post interview<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/18/ed-rendell-apologizes-for-ugly-women-remarks-in-washington-post-interview/>

WASHINGTON POST // DAVID WEIGEL

Ed Rendell, the former governor of Pennsylvania who will play a key role at the Democratic Party's July convention in Philadelphia, has apologized for a quote he gave in an interview with The Washington Post. A joke he made about why Donald Trump's misogynistic remarks would backfire -- "There are probably more ugly women in America than attractive women" -- unexpectedly went viral, earning headlines from local Pennsylvania newspapers to People magazine. "What I said was incredibly stupid and insensitive," Rendell told reporters in Philadelphia on Wednesday. "When I read it in the article, I said, 'Did I say that?' It was just dumb, and stupid, and insensitive, and if I offended anyone, I apologize." As the reporter who interviewed Rendell, this seems like a good opportunity to explain how the quote got into the story. From Thursday through Sunday, I reported a piece about Philadelphia's suburbs, whose increasingly blue tinge had helped Democrats win the state in every presidential election since 1992. I reached out to Rendell, hoping to talk briefly in person to a politician who had mastered the art of winning the city and suburbs in his two thumping gubernatorial wins. I heard back with a phone call at 5:19 p.m. on Friday, as I was parking for an interview set to start at 5:30. An assistant put Rendell on the line, and I took detailed notes on the laptop perched on my steering wheel.

House slated for contentious vote on the Confederate flag<http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/280470-house-slated-for-contentious-vote-on-the-confederate-flag>

THE HILL // CRISTINA MARCOS

House Democrats will force a vote Thursday morning on whether the Confederate flag should continued to be displayed in national cemeteries run by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The move resurrects a contentious debate that erupted nearly a year ago after the racially motivated shooting at a historically black church in Charleston, S.C. last June. Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) revived a similar amendment that he offered to an Interior Department spending bill last year that ultimately derailed the entire appropriations process due to divisions among Republicans over the Confederate flag. His latest amendment to the 2017 bill funding the VA and military construction projects, offered shortly after midnight on Thursday, would prohibit the large-scale display of the Confederate flag in VA cemeteries such as flying the banner over mass graves. However, it would still permit families to place small individual Confederate flags on graves for limited amounts of time two days a year. Huffman wants Republicans to go on the record about whether they support flying the Confederate flag after they avoided doing so last year. Hours earlier, Republicans rejected a Democratic attempt late Wednesday night to amend the defense authorization so that the Confederate flag could no longer be flown at the Citadel, which, incidentally, is about two miles from the Charleston church where last year's shooting occurred.

Republicans

GOP Senators’ Fundraising Aided by Trump’s Slow Start<http://www.wsj.com/articles/gop-senators-fundraising-aided-by-trumps-slow-start-1463610728>

BETH REINHARD AND REBECCA BALLHAUS

Donald Trump’s outreach to traditional Republican donors so late in the 2016 presidential campaign has turned into a windfall for Senate Republicans in competitive elections. This time four years ago, fundraiser Mel Immergut was on his way to collecting more than $2 million for presidential nominee Mitt Romney. Less than six months before the 2016 election, he hasn’t decided whether to support Mr. Trump, but he attended a fundraiser for Ohio Sen. Rob Portman and committed to co-hosting two events for New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte. They are two of the most endangered Republicans on the November ballot. Mr. Immergut is among scores of Republican donors who are so far staying out of the presidential race, either because they don’t support Mr. Trump or because he hasn’t reached out to them.

House GOP Works on Budget Hail Mary<http://www.rollcall.com/news/policy/house-republicans-working-budget-hail-mary>

ROLL CALL // LINDSEY MCPHERSON

House Republicans are still trying to reach consensus on a budget resolution that would guide their spending decisions, with a new proposal being considered to shave $30 billion off the budget until the House passes at least 10 spending bills. At the same time, some conservative Republicans say they will vote for at least some of the appropriations bills that have begun moving through the House this week at higher budget levels. One idea being floated for a budget resolution would call for setting the top line of the budget at $1.04 trillion, the figure favored by conservative Republicans, but include a "trigger" provision that would allow the budget to be increased to the full $1.07 trillion if the House passes at least 10 spending bills. "That's gaining a lot of support among conservative members, feeling like if we get back to the normal appropriations process it gives control back to members of Congress and that the increase in spending would be a minor exchange for getting back to regular order," House Freedom Caucus founding member Mark Meadows, R-N.C., said in an interview.

Republicans Near Agreement With Treasury Department on Puerto Rico Bill<http://www.wsj.com/articles/republicans-near-agreement-with-treasury-department-on-puerto-rico-bill-1463603759>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // NICK TIMIRAOS

House Republicans and the Obama administration neared an agreement Wednesday to provide Puerto Rico a path to restructure its $70 billion debt load, the first step toward ending its decadelong recession. With nearly all other details ironed out, disagreements remained over how to handle appointments to a seven-member board designed to oversee the island’s finances. Lawmakers appeared to have reached a compromise over a previous sticking point about how to respect the territory’s constitutional priorities governing bond and pension payments. The bill would offer the island a legal out similar to bankruptcy and wouldn’t commit any federal money, a critical requirement to win support of conservatives.

House GOP Is Determined To Make It Harder For Poor Kids To Get Free School Lunches<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/gop-school-lunch_us_573c7e82e4b0ef86171cca10>

HUFFINGTON POST // JOSEPH ERBENTRAUT

House Republicans appear determined to advance an aggressive rollback of a program credited with helping low-income children get free school lunches. The Committee on Education and the Workforce on Wednesday advanced a child nutrition reauthorization bill introduced by Rep. Todd Rokita (R-Indiana) to the House floor. The committee approved the legislation along party lines, 20-14, with Rep. Dave Brad (R-Virginia) the only Republican to join Democrats opposing it. The legislation, called the Improving Child Nutrition and Education Act of 2016, has been widely panned by nutrition and hunger groups, which say it would reverse 2010 improvements to the national school lunch program. A letter opposing the bill released this week by the Center for Science in the Public Interest was signed by more than 750 local, state and national groups.

Top House Republican moves to censure IRS chief<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/05/18/top-house-republican-moves-to-censure-irs-chief/>

WASHINGTON POST // LISA REIN

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) introduced a resolution on Wednesday to censure IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, raising the stakes in the GOP war against the tax collector days before a hearing on whether to impeach him. The four-page resolution seeks Koskinen’s resignation or removal by President Obama and calls on the IRS chief to forfeit his federal pension. A censure vote is warranted because Koskinen failed to comply with a congressional investigation into the Internal Revenue Service’s treatment of conservative groups, the document says. It accuses him of conduct “incompatible with his duties and inconsistent with the trust and confidence placed in him as an officer of the United States.” “I am committed to using every tool at my disposal to hold Mr. Koskinen responsible for his offenses toward Congress and toward the American people,” Chaffetz, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said in a statement.

GOP lawmaker files bill to counter Obama's bathroom directive<http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/280440-indiana-rep-files-bill-to-protect-students-from-obama-bathroom>

THE HILL // REBECCA SARVANSKY

A GOP lawmaker has filed legislation to wrest control away from the Obama administration on the escalating issue of transgender bathroom use in schools. Rep. Luke Messer (R-Ind.) filed a bill on Wednesday that protects the authority of state and local governments to set school policy on bathrooms, undermining a recent decree by the departments of Justice and Education. The administration's guidance, issued last week, tells public schools to allow transgender students to use the bathrooms that match their gender identities. Under the directive, schools that fail to comply could face lawsuits or loss of federal aid for breaching Title IX requirements. Messer introduced the PUBLIC School Act, which gives state and local governments the power to "enact and enforce policies regarding the use of sex-segregated bathrooms and sex-segregated locker rooms of educational institutions on the basis of gender identity."

Steve King calls for 'civil disobedience' on Obama bathroom directive<http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/280428-steve-king-calls-for-civil-disobedience-on-obamas-bathroom>

THE HILL // REBECCA SARVANSKY

Influential conservative Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) is advising "civil disobedience" against the Obama administration's directive last week telling public schools to allow transgender students to use the bathrooms that match their gender identities. “We should call for civil disobedience here,” King told Iowa radio host Simon Conway on Tuesday, Buzzfeed News reported. “And there’s no reason for us to follow an unconstitutional edict from the president, who is on his way out the door.” King said last week that the administration's actions in response to state-level "bathroom laws" are executive overreach. He said he would likely call a hearing on Obama's directive. "I oppose that piece of policy," King said on C-SPAN Friday. "And it's a topic we're likely to bring up in a future hearing before the task force that I chair."

How the Bathroom Wars Shaped America<http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/2016-bathroom-bills-politics-north-carolina-lgbt-transgender-history-restrooms-era-civil-rights-213902>

POLITICO // NEIL YOUNG

There seems to be no more controversial place in American life right now than the public restroom. It’s become the latest battlefield in the culture wars — an issue so electric that the most powerful politicians in the country have weighed in: President Barack Obama, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Ted Cruz, and Donald Trump. In 2016, at least 15 states have considered “bathroom bills” similar to the legislation recently enacted in North Carolina, which blocks transgender people from using bathrooms that don’t correspond to the sex listed on their birth certificates. Opponents of these proposals have argued that the real impetus isn’t restroom protocol; it’s part of an ugly attempt by social conservatives to score a victory against a surging LGBT movement. But it would be a mistake to see the bathroom bills as nothing more than a desperate last-minute counterpunch against an ascendant gay-rights movement. There’s a forgotten history at play: For as long as public restrooms have existed, they’ve been a political flash point.

Why Senate Republicans Are Worried About the RNC<http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/senate-republicans-worried-rnc>

ROLL CALL // ALEX ROARTY

Senate Republican operatives are worried that the Republican National Committee will be unable to make key investments in important battlegrounds if it doesn’t find a way to replenish its depleted coffers. At the end of March, the RNC had $16 million on hand , according to documents filed with the Federal Election Commission, half the amount it had at a similar point in the last presidential race. More startling is the RNC actually has less money than the National Republican Senatorial Committee, whose fundraising usually lags far behind the national party’s. The Senate GOP’s political arm had $20 million on hand as of March 31 – $4 million more than the RNC. Officials at the national party dispute that they have a fundraising problem. They say the committee is raising record amounts of cash and spending it on a robust field operation. Other Republicans are also confident that now that the RNC this week signed a joint fundraising agreement with Donald Trump , its fundraising will grow exponentially. But those hopes have been met with skepticism among the men and women running Senate Republican campaigns, who rate the RNC’s cash situation as a top concern.  Several agreed to speak to Roll Call but asked that their names not be used, fearing reprisal from the committee.

Rubio hires Washington superlawyer to field job offers<http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/florida/2016/05/8599549/rubio-hires-washington-superlawyer-field-job-offers>

POLITICO // MARC CAPUTO

Robert Barnett, the Washington superlawyer who negotiated approximately $1.3 million worth of book deals for Marco Rubio, has been hired by the U.S. senator to handle what Barnett describes as a crush of job offers ahead of his retirement from elected office in January. “Senator Rubio has already received many — and will receive many more — inquiries from interested individuals and entities. They come from a wide variety of sectors and reflect the fact that he will be in high demand,” Barnett said in an email to POLITICO Florida. Barnett, who has represented the current and former presidents and former presidential contenders like Rubio, wouldn’t discuss specifics. “Of course, many of the speakers bureaus want to sign him up, too. He will likely also do some teaching,” Barnett said, referring to Rubio’s part-time post at Florida International University in Miami. “We won't start negotiating anything until we receive guidance from the Ethics Committee.” Two jobs are off the table, Rubio has said: lobbying and working for Wall Street. He also has said he won’t run for governor in 2018 but he hasn’t ruled out another campaign for president. He’d like to remain living in the Miami area, he said. Rubio’s hiring of the seasoned negotiator from Williams & Connolly allows him to focus more on his job as senator, according to his staff.

Ryan strikes Puerto Rico debt deal with Obama administration<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/paul-ryan-puerto-rico-debt-deal-223333>

POLITICO // RACHEL BADE AND COLIN WILHELM

Speaker Paul Ryan has reached a tentative deal with the Treasury Department on a rescue package to ease Puerto Rico's debt crisis, according to House Natural Resources Chairman Rob Bishop (R- Utah), who has been leading negotiations. “We are moving forward — there is a deal,” the Utah Republican said Wednesday afternoon, adding that legislative text of the deal would be released later on Wednesday. Ryan spokeswoman AshLee Strong in a statement, however, hedged on the deal, suggesting lawmakers are still working through the details and that some provisions may still be fluid: “There’s no final product until a bill is introduced,” Strong said. “And that timing is TBA.” Still, the tentative agreement represents a breakthrough on an issue that has been stuck in congressional limbo for months. Ryan (R-Wis.) said last year that helping Puerto Rico restructure its multi-billion-dollar debt would be a top priority for the first quarter of 2016. But conservatives balked at Bishop’s initial proposal, following a series of ads that labeled the measure a “bailout.” Democrats also refused to support that earlier deal because of a minimum wage decrease included in the measure.

2016 Democrats

Ex-Aide to Hillary Clinton Testifies About Email Server<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/us/politics/ex-aide-to-hillary-clinton-testifies-on-email.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // ERIC LICHTBLAU

A former aide to Hillary Clinton when she was secretary of state testified behind closed doors for two hours Wednesday in the first in a series of depositions that are likely to raise more questions about Mrs. Clinton’s use of a private email server just as she prepares for an election campaign against Donald J. Trump. The former aide, Lewis A. Lukens, testified under oath about his knowledge of Mrs. Clinton’s private email system as part of a lawsuit brought against the State Department by a conservative legal advocacy group, Judicial Watch. At least five other officials — including two of Mrs. Clinton’s top aides at the State Department, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin — are also scheduled to testify in the lawsuit over the next six weeks in what promises to be an unwelcome distraction for the Clinton campaign.

Clinton, Sanders' Kentucky delegate split pending<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/05/18/clinton-sanders-kentucky-delegate-split-pending/84563120/>

USA TODAY // JOSEPH GERTH

The Kentucky Democratic Party on Wednesday was waiting on final numbers from the Tuesday's presidential primary before doling out delegates to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. Daniel Lowry, a spokesman for the party, said Democrats had hoped to get the numbers by Wednesday afternoon but the numbers may not be finalized until sometime Thursday. He said the party expects the apportionment could be 28 delegates for Clinton and 27 for Sanders following the narrow win for the former secretary of state. "It was so close," Lowry said of the election returns. According to the Kentucky Secretary of State's Office, Clinton beat Sanders by 1,924 votes out of 454,573 cast in the presidential primary.

Democrats Fear an Unruly July Convention in Philadelphia<http://www.wsj.com/articles/democrats-fear-an-unruly-july-convention-in-philadelphia-1463614009>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // BRYON TAU AND COLLEEN NELSON

A growing number of Democrats are bracing for a divisive and disorderly July presidential convention in Philadelphia that could damage the party and expected nominee Hillary Clinton. A loose coalition of supporters of rival Sen. Bernie Sanders is using social media to plan a series of events at the Democratic National Convention. Using pro-Sanders blogs and websites, organizers will be pressing to insert his progressive agenda—from free college tuition to revisions in the primary process—into the party’s platform. At least five of the nine permit applications to hold demonstrations during the four-day event have been filed by pro-Sanders forces with the Philadelphia city government, according to the mayor’s office. The groups planning the events are named The Berners, Black Men for Bernie, Movement for Bernie and Bernie-or-Bust. No applications have been filed yet by supporters of Mrs. Clinton.

Clinton and Sanders must make peace<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/clinton-and-sanders-must-make-peace/2016/05/18/74a550be-1d18-11e6-9c81-4be1c14fb8c8_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // EJ DIONNE JR.

The success of Bernie Sanders’s insurgency is a marvel and an achievement. His showing is a mark of the anger and frustration felt by so many Americans over the abuses of capitalism that led to the crash of 2008. With the help of millions of voters, especially the young, he has broadened a political debate long hemmed in by the dominance of conservative assumptions and the stifling of progressive aspirations. Sanders has put a progressive alternative to Obamacare (a single-payer system) back on the political agenda. He has offered a sweeping plan to provide free public college education for all Americans and spoken indefatigably about the corrupting influence of money on our political system. After hearing an endless stream of preposterous attacks on President Obama as a socialist, we now know what the real thing looks like. And many more Americans now realize that the words “democratic socialism” refer to popular movements in rather attractive places (Denmark, Norway, Sweden) and not to the old Soviet Union.

A fractured Democratic Party threatens Clinton’s chances against Trump<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/a-fractured-democratic-party-threatens-clintons-chances-against-trump/2016/05/18/91e53d12-1c6c-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // DAVID WEIGEL

When Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont took the stage this week after falling short in the Kentucky primary, supporters of Hillary Clinton wondered whether he would finally soften his tone and let her move on to a general election against Donald Trump. They didn’t have to wonder for long. Sanders credited Clinton’s victory to “a closed primary, something I am not all that enthusiastic about, where independents are not allowed to vote.” He commanded the Democratic Party to “do the right thing and open its doors and let into the party people who are prepared to fight for economic and social change.” And then he promised that he’s staying in the race until the convention. “Let me be as clear as I can be: We are in ’til the last ballot is cast!” The performance prompted cheers across a crowd of about 8,000 in Carson, Calif., highlighting the mistrust and alienation that Sanders’s most ardent fans feel about Clinton, the Democrats and their “rigged” system.

Bernie Sanders, Eyeing Convention, Willing to Harm Hillary Clinton in the Homestretch<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/us/politics/bernie-sanderss-campaign-accuses-head-of-dnc-of-favoritism.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // PATRICK HEALY, YAMICHE ALCINDOR AND JEREMY W. PETERS

Defiant and determined to transform the Democratic Party, Senator Bernie Sanders is opening a two-month phase of his presidential campaign aimed at inflicting a heavy blow on Hillary Clinton in California and amassing enough leverage to advance his agenda at the convention in July — or even wrest the nomination from her. Advisers to Mr. Sanders said on Wednesday that he was newly resolved to remain in the race, seeing an aggressive campaign as his only chance to pressure Democrats into making fundamental changes to how presidential primaries and debates are held in the future. They said he also held out hope of capitalizing on any late stumbles by Mrs. Clinton or any damage to her candidacy, whether by scandal or by the presumptive Republican nominee, Donald J. Trump. After sounding subdued if not downbeat about the race for weeks, Mr. Sanders resumed a combative posture against Mrs. Clinton, demanding on Wednesday that she debate him before the June 7 primary in California and highlighting anew what he asserted were her weaknesses against Mr. Trump.

Democrats sweat Sanders revolt<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/bernie-sanders-democrats-revolt-clinton-223342>

POLITICO // DANIEL STRAUSS AND NOLAN MCCASKILL

Hours after voters registered a split decision – a razor-thin victory for Hillary Clinton in Kentucky and a more comfortable win for Bernie Sanders in Oregon — top Democrats took to insisting that the seeming rift between Sanders supporters and the party establishment was no cause for alarm and no threat to an orderly national convention in July. But with other Democrats alluding to the chaos of the 1968 Democratic convention, the Sanders campaign continuing to strike a defiant pose and even Donald Trump fanning the flames of Democratic discontent, the prospect of a hot landing in Philadelphia seemed more real than ever Wednesday. Nevada Democratic Chairwoman Roberta Lange, the target of numerous threats of violence in recent days in the wake of her state’s unruly party convention last weekend, called for an apology from Sanders and warned that the intensifying fallout from her state’s convention is threatening the party’s ability to unite in time for the November general election.

Sanders camp slams Debbie Wasserman Schultz for 'throwing shade' <http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/bernie-sanders-debbie-wasserman-schultz-criticism-223318>

POLITICO // NOLAN MCCASKILL

The latest controversy roiling the Democratic Party showed no signs of abating Wednesday, as Bernie Sanders’ campaign put the onus of the rift splitting Democrats on Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s failed leadership, accusing her of “throwing shade” on the Vermont senator from the beginning. The chaos that ensued Saturday in Nevada at its state convention over what some perceived as unfair delegate allocations erupted onto the national scene and has lingered beyond two additional Democratic primaries, exposing the Democratic Party to infighting as the Republican Party takes steps to unify behind its presumptive presidential nominee. Sanders’ campaign fired back at Wasserman Schultz on Wednesday morning after the Democratic National Committee chairwoman panned the campaign’s “anything but acceptable” response to reports of violence and threats from Sanders supporters at the Nevada Democratic convention over the weekend.

Bernie Sanders accepts Fox News debate invitation<http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/05/bernie-sanders-fox-news-democratic-debate-223337>

POLITICO // HADAS GOLD

Sen. Bernie Sanders has accepted a Fox News invitation for a Democratic debate in California, the Sanders campaign announced on Wednesday. “Both campaigns have been invited by Fox News to a debate. We have told the network that we would accept the invitation with the understanding that we can reach mutual agreement on the debate moderators, the format and other details,” Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ campaign manager said in a statement. Fox News has expressed interest in holding a Democratic debate for months and has been publicly lobbying the Democratic National Committee. In March, both Sanders and Hillary Clinton participated in back-to-back town halls with Fox host Bret Baier. On Tuesday, Fox News sent a formal letter to both campaigns inviting them to a debate, the Washington Post reported. The letters and the Sanders campaign's statements didn't specify a time or place, though Fox News said the debate would be moderated by anchors Baier, Megyn Kelly and Chris Wallace, who have been roundly praised for their handling of three Republican debates.

Bit player Sanders poised to become Senate force<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/bernie-sanders-senate-democrats-223336>

POLITICO // BURGESS EVERETT

Long a lonely voice of the left in the Senate, Bernie Sanders is poised to return to his day job as a potential kingmaker after a presidential campaign that made him a household name and hero of the progressive movement. But the Vermont senator risks frittering away that newfound clout, Democratic senators said Wednesday, if he doesn’t move soon to unite the party and train his fire on Donald Trump. The lawmakers said they’re disturbed that Sanders hasn’t more forcefully repudiated the behavior of his supporters in Nevada last weekend. Sanders backers threw chairs, shouted down Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and threatened a state party chairwoman — raising the specter of similar ugliness at the Democratic National Convention in July. While Sanders has not suffered permanent damage in the eyes of his colleagues, his reputation among Democratic Party stalwarts is hanging in the balance. “It depends on how he handles the national convention in Philadelphia and how he handles the next months,” said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), who says she was heckled for the first time in her life by Sanders supporters during the New Hampshire primary. “I appreciate that he’s going to continue to stay defiant, but the fact is Hillary Clinton’s going to win the nomination. Is he going to support her and campaign for her, or is he going to help elect Donald Trump?”

Sanders’ marriage of convenience with Democrats fraying<http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/sanders-marriage-convenience-democrats-fraying>

MSNBC // ALEX SEITZ-WALD

The 25-year-marriage of convenience between Bernie Sanders and the Democratic Party is on the rocks, as the Vermont independent senator is threatening to take his millions of supporters with him in the separation. Sanders has made it clear he will his lead his army of committed activists into battle against presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, but that doesn’t mean he’ll do it under the Democratic Party’s banner. That should give Democrats reason to worry about the long term implications of his political revolution on their party. This week, Sanders supporters booed his mention of the Democratic Party at a rally in California, while the party’s chairwoman accused the senator of “excus[ing]” death threats made by his fans against another party leader. Amid the tension Tuesday night, Sanders’ policy director announced on Twitter that he had donated money to DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’ congressional primary opponent. “[A]fter tonight, it’s way too late for establishment politics,” he explained. As the controversy over a raucous state convention in Nevada stretched into its fourth day, Democrats across the country are increasingly worried about about a tumultuous national convention in July and a lasting fissure in the party.

Clinton’s tech team stumbles toward Trump<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/clintons-tech-team-stumbles-toward-trump-223347>

POLITICO // DARREN SAMUELSON

Hillary Clinton built her 2016 campaign around the Democratic Party’s most vaunted data geeks and online gurus, boasting of plans to “create the next big thing” in digital politics. But after failing to deliver the resounding win she wanted against Bernie Sanders, some Democrats are warning the Brooklyn boiler room against overconfidence in the matchup with Donald Trump’s decidedly low-tech campaign. In a series of interviews at the campaign’s New York headquarters, Clinton’s tech team conceded it was caught off guard by Sanders, whose enterprise started miles behind in money and organization but has bested the front-runner at nearly every turn. The Vermont senator has been far more adept at going viral: His 10 most popular web videos have nearly 3.1 million more views on You Tube than Clinton’s similarly highest-rated offerings. His army of volunteer coders has pumped out new apps by the dozen to help his supporters get to the polls in a series of late-cycle primaries and caucuses. And it is Sanders who has built this campaign’s most highly-coveted list of millions of names and email addresses of small-dollar donors, a group of supporters who has helped keep his bank account flush with cash and allowed him to hold on much deeper into a primary season that was widely predicted to yield a Clinton coronation before spring.

Clinton tops Sanders, Trump in New Jersey poll<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/clinton-beats-sanders-trump-in-new-jersey-poll-223338>

POLITICO // NICK GASS

Hillary Clinton leads Bernie Sanders by double digits among likely voters in New Jersey’s Democratic primary, according to the results of the latest Quinnipiac University poll out Thursday. Matched against presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, both Democratic candidates came out on top, but Sanders leads by a wider margin. Those likely to vote in the state’s June 7 primary preferred Clinton to Sanders, 54 percent to 40 percent, with 6 percent undecided. Just 15 percent said they could change their mind, while 84 percent said they are firmly committed. Sanders leads Clinton among those describing themselves as very liberal (52 percent to 48 percent), among those 44 years of age and younger (66 percent to 33 percent) and among men (49 percent to 45 percent). In her general election matchup with Trump, Clinton leads 45 percent to 38 percent, with women, younger voters and college graduates indicating a stronger preference toward the former secretary of state. The gender gap between Trump and Clinton is on full display in the New Jersey poll, as 46 percent to 36 percent of men said they would vote for Trump and 53 percent of women said they preferred Clinton to 32 percent who would prefer the presumptive Republican nominee.

Subtract One Clinton<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/opinion/subtract-one-clinton.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // GAIL COLLINS

Bill Clinton should go home. It’s easy to see why his wife’s campaign is giving him a major role. His political skills are legendary. And he’s the spouse, for heaven’s sake. Presidential candidates always rely on their families to fill out the schedule, show up where they can’t, spread good cheer. But we all know this is different. Campaigning in Kentucky — where her husband is more popular than she is — Hillary Clinton told voters that Bill would be “in charge of revitalizing the economy” in her administration. At another stop she promised that if they returned to the White House, “I’ll expect him to go to work … to get incomes rising.” She presented herself as part of a duo that knows “a little bit about how to create jobs. I think my husband did a heck of a job.” Hillary wants to be the first woman ever elected president of the United States. The economy is the central issue in the campaign. The fact that she’s assuring voters that Bill will take care of it is … totally wrong.

2016 Republican

Donald Trump accuses Bill Clinton of rape<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-mentions-rape-discussing-bill-clinton-223348>

POLITICO // NICK GASS

The allegations raised against Donald Trump in a recent New York Times article are nothing compared to the Clintons' history, the presumptive Republican nominee said in an interview with Fox News' "Hannity" aired Wednesday night. "For example, I looked at The New York Times. Are they going to interview Juanita Broaddrick? Are they going to interview Paula Jones? Are they going to interview Kathleen Willey?" Hannity asked Trump, according to a transcript of the show. "In one case, it's about exposure. In another case, it's about groping and fondling and touching against a woman's will." Trump replied, "And rape." "And rape," Hannity repeated. "And big settlements, massive settlements," Trump added. "And lots of other things. And impeachment for lying."

Donald Trump Releases Names of 11 Potential Supreme Court Choices<http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-releases-names-of-11-potential-supreme-court-choices-1463598588>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // BRENT KENDALL

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump on Wednesday listed 11 candidates he would consider to fill the vacancy at the Supreme Court, a move aimed at easing concerns on the right about his commitment to conservative judges. The list includes six federal appeals-court judges appointed by former Republican President George W. Bush, as well as five state Supreme Court justices with conservative credentials. The roster of potential nominees prompted split reactions from Republicans, Democrats and advocacy groups that see judicial nominations as a priority, particularly for issues such as abortion.

Donald Trump Releases List of Possible Supreme Court Picks<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/us/politics/donald-trump-supreme-court-nominees.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // ALAN RAPPEPORT AND CHARLIE SAVAGE

Donald J. Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, released a list of potential Supreme Court nominees on Wednesday as part of an effort to quell concerns that he would not select conservative jurists. The unusual move comes as Mr. Trump is looking to unify the Republican Party behind him and win over critics who remain skeptical about his candidacy. While some Republicans who oppose Mr. Trump have considered supporting Hillary Clinton or sitting out the election, he has regularly reminded them that the future of the Supreme Court is at stake. After the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, critics of Mr. Trump expressed concern about whether he had the judgment to fill vacancies on the court. He had joked about appointing his sister, Maryanne Trump Barry, a federal appeals court judge in Philadelphia, before suggesting that he would look for someone in the mold of Justice Scalia and later promising to furnish some prospective candidates.

Who Are These People? A Look at Donald Trump's Potential Supreme Court Picks<http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/who-are-these-people-look-donald-trump-s-potential-supreme-n576446>

NBC NEWS // IRIN CARMON NAD ZACHARY ROTH

Donald Trump has released a list of potential Supreme Court nominees that seems designed to placate his conservative critics. It suggests the presumptive Republican nominee has no interest in breaking the mold when it comes to the lifetime appointments on the court. It is a safe list. All are sitting judges nominated by Republicans, some on federal and some on state courts. All appear to be white; seven are men, and four are women. And all 11 are listed as experts on website of the conservative Federalist Society, a key legal arbiter for the right. Five of the 11 are state Supreme Court justices, which do not have to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate and thus often fly relatively under the radar. All of the federal judges were appointed by President George W. Bush.

Trump-haters’ November nightmare has arrived in the form of a Fox News poll<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/05/18/trump-haters-november-nightmare-has-arrived-in-the-form-of-a-fox-news-poll/>

WASHINGTON POST // PHILIP BUMP

Imagine, between every paragraph of what you're about to read, a quiet little reminder that one poll conducted six months before an election isn't, by itself, predictive. Actually, we can do better than that. We'll go ahead and insert that reminder at regular intervals. That said: A Fox News poll released Wednesday evening shows Donald Trump taking the lead over Hillary Clinton in the likely November general election match-up. Trump has seen a 10-point increase from voters since Fox's poll in April, thanks to a big increase in support from independents (plus-19), men (+11) -- and women (+8 since last month). Trump's numbers in a hypothetical (and much less likely) match-up against Bernie Sanders aren't much worse. Sanders maintains a 4-point lead -- just outside the margin of error -- but Trump's gained 10 points against the Vermont senator since last month. The big swing among independents against Clinton means that Trump now leads her with that group by 16. Independents still favor Sanders, but by only 8 points instead of the 20-point lead he enjoyed in April.

Trump pulls ahead of Clinton in new national poll<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/05/18/trump-pulls-ahead-clinton-new-national-poll/84567376/>

USA TODAY // WILLIAM CUMMINGS

So much for the all the pundits and experts who said Donald Trump wouldn't stand a chance in the general election. Trump would narrowly defeat Hillary Clinton 45-42%, according to a new national poll released by Fox News Wednesday. The three-point lead is within the survey's margin of error. The poll shows Trump with the edge despite a 14-point deficit among women. Clinton would win among women 50-36%, but Trump would win by a wider, 55-33% margin among men. Clinton is also behind in the poll despite a whopping 90-7% lead among blacks and a 62-23% lead among Hispanics. Trump makes up the difference thanks to a 55-31% lead among whites, including a 9-point lead among white women. Trump also leads by 16 points among independents, according to the poll.

Details on Donald Trump’s Finances Are Released, but Net Worth Is Unclear<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/us/politics/donald-trump-money.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // STEVE EDER KITTY BENNETT

Last August, Donald J. Trump was busy igniting a feud with Megyn Kelly, getting under Jeb Bush’s skin and flying around the country to thrill his supporters with promises to build a wall on the Mexican border. That month, Mr. Trump announced a new hotel and tower in Bali, Indonesia. Then he embarked on a venture in Jidda, Saudi Arabia. And he soon set up another business in India with a focus on Kolkata. While Mr. Trump has hopscotched the United States as a presidential candidate over the past year, it has been business as usual at the Trump Organization’s headquarters in New York, complete with new endeavors and international partnerships, according to entries in a 104-page financial disclosure form from Mr. Trump that was made public on Wednesday by the Federal Election Commission. The document offered new details on the enterprises and the financial picture of Mr. Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee. The limitations of the form, however, made it impossible to calculate his specific net worth or to verify his claim that he is worth more than $10 billion.

Disclosure Form Details Donald Trump’s Income Sources<http://www.wsj.com/articles/disclosure-form-details-donald-trumps-income-sources-1463614927>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // PETER GRANT AND ANDREA FULLER

Donald Trump’s income from licensing his name to overseas companies has continued to rise since he announced his candidacy for president, his latest federal financial-disclosure form shows. But the Republican has earned less from some other sources since announcing his White House bid in June 2015, according to an analysis of his Federal Election Commission filing. For example, he no longer makes paid public appearances. Also, the disparaging remarks that he made about Mexican immigrants last year had an impact on his beauty pageant and menswear line. Mr. Trump’s ready cash may have declined, according to the form, which was made public Wednesday. He has between about $61 million and $173 million in stocks, bonds, cash and other relatively liquid holdings. Last July, he reported he had between $78 million and $232 million in such assets.

Donald Trump Profits In Private From The Companies He Trashes In Public<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-profits-nabisco-carrier-ford_us_573cb5e0e4b0ef86171cfbf0?utm_hp_ref=politics>

HUFFINGTON POST // CHRISTINA WILKIE

In public, presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump rails against U.S. companies that outsource jobs overseas, like Nabisco, Carrier and Ford. He has called for a boycott of Apple and accused Disney of abusing the H1-B visa program to staff its resorts. But in private, Trump is profiting from investments in the very same corporations he trashes on the campaign trail. According to Trump’s personal disclosure forms, released Wednesday, he earned between $150,000 and $1.1 million in the past year from investments in companies that he has publicly attacked. Trump’s most frequent targets include Nabisco, the Carrier Corporation, and Ford. The parent companies of Nabisco and Carrier have both outsourced hundreds of jobs to Mexico in recent months. Ford plans to build a new plant in Mexico’s San Luis Potosí state, a plan Trump has called “a disgrace.”

Wall Street bearish on Trump's call to scrap financial reform law<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-banks-idUSKCN0Y9329>

REUTERS // EMILY STEPHENSON

U.S. banking lobbyists said on Wednesday they disagree with presidential candidate Donald Trump's call for a wholesale repeal of President Barack Obama's financial reform law, even though they share his view that it is overly burdensome. U.S. banks do want changes to the 2010 Dodd-Frank law but after spending millions of dollars to bring themselves into compliance with it, they are wary of Trump's call for it to be essentially scrapped. Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, vowed on Tuesday to dismantle most of the law. "Dodd Frank has made it impossible for bankers to function," he told Reuters in an interview. Richard Hunt, head of the Consumer Bankers Association, a Washington trade group, said he appreciated Trump's interest in changes to the financial regulatory system. "It certainly needs some perfecting," he said.

Bezos on Donald Trump threats: Not appropriate for a presidential candidate<http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/05/jeff-bezos-donald-trump-amazon-223345>

POLITICO // HADAS GOLD

Amazon founder and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos said Donald Trump is not acting appropriately for a presidential candidate. Speaking to the paper's executive editor Marty Baron at a technology event at the Washington Post headquarters, Bezos said Trump's recent attacks on him and the paper had no place in American politics. "That's not an appropriate way for a presidential candidate to behave," Bezos said, adding that his actions erode "the norms" of free speech. In an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity on Thursday night, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee alleged that the Amazon founder uses the Washington Post to secure tax benefits for his company.

Trump’s deal with the RNC shows how big money is flowing back to the parties<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-deal-with-the-rnc-shows-how-big-money-is-flowing-back-to-the-parties/2016/05/18/4d84e14a-1d11-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // MATEA GOLD

The deal Donald Trump struck with the Republican National Committee this week that allows wealthy supporters to give nearly $500,000 to finance his campaign and get-out-the-vote activities made it official: The parties are back in the big-money business. Fourteen years after a landmark campaign-finance overhaul clamped down on the flow of unregulated money to party coffers, both Republicans and Democrats are raising huge contributions again with gusto. Thanks to a pivotal 2014 Supreme Court decision and an expansion of party fundraising slipped into an appropriations bill later that year, the RNC and its Democratic counterpart have been able to vastly increase their top donor levels by pooling numerous accounts and affiliates together into jumbo joint fundraising committees.

This is how fascism comes to America<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-is-how-fascism-comes-to-america/2016/05/17/c4e32c58-1c47-11e6-8c7b-6931e66333e7_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // ROBERT KAGAN

The Republican Party’s attempt to treat Donald Trump as a normal political candidate would be laughable were it not so perilous to the republic. If only he would mouth the party’s “conservative” principles, all would be well. But of course the entire Trump phenomenon has nothing to do with policy or ideology. It has nothing to do with the Republican Party, either, except in its historic role as incubator of this singular threat to our democracy. Trump has transcended the party that produced him. His growing army of supporters no longer cares about the party. Because it did not immediately and fully embrace Trump, because a dwindling number of its political and intellectual leaders still resist him, the party is regarded with suspicion and even hostility by his followers. Their allegiance is to him and him alone. And the source of allegiance? We’re supposed to believe that Trump’s support stems from economic stagnation or dislocation. Maybe some of it does.

Donald Trump’s Views on North Korea Test Hillary Clinton<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/us/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-north-korea.html>

NEW YORK TIMES // MARK LANDLER

As Hillary Clinton and Donald J. Trump step gingerly into a general election debate on foreign policy, the rogue government in North Korea has become an early test case of the challenges that Mrs. Clinton will face in confronting the unorthodox pronouncements of her presumptive Republican opponent. Mr. Trump told Reuters on Tuesday that he would be open to negotiating directly with the North Korean dictator, Kim Jong-un — an overture that would upend three decades of American diplomacy. “I would speak to him,” Mr. Trump declared. “I would have no problem speaking to him.” The previous evening, in New York, the senior policy adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Jake Sullivan, laid out her strategy for dealing with the reclusive leader — one that relies on a familiar formula of tightening sanctions against the government to pressure it to enter into multiparty negotiations on its nuclear program. Mr. Sullivan said nothing about Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Trump’s likely Democratic opponent, meeting Mr. Kim. Foreign policy experts said Mr. Trump’s openness to a presidential meeting was problematic because it would legitimize North Korea’s status as a nuclear-weapons power, unnerve American allies like South Korea and Japan and likely fail to persuade Mr. Kim to give up his weapons. Some predicted that after a policy review, a Trump administration would likely take a similar approach toward Pyongyang as a Clinton administration.

Donald Trump Brings Up 1999 Rape Allegation Against Bill Clinton<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/us/politics/donald-trump-bill-clinton.html>

NEW YORK TIMES // NICK CORASANITI

Donald J. Trump escalated his attacks on former President Bill Clinton’s past in an interview on Wednesday with Sean Hannity on Fox News, bringing up an old allegation of rape. Discussing a recent New York Times article regarding Mr. Trump’s history with women, Mr. Hannity led Mr. Trump down a line of questioning, naming women who had accused Mr. Clinton of sexual misconduct. “For example, I looked at The New York Times,” Mr. Hannity said. “Are they going to interview Juanita Broaddrick? Are they going to interview Paula Jones? Are they going to interview Kathleen Willey?” He continued: “In one case, it’s about exposure. In another case, it’s about groping and fondling and touching against a woman’s will.” Mr. Trump interjected, unprompted: “And rape.” He was referring to Ms. Broaddrick, who made her allegations public in 1999. They were publicly denied by Mr. Clinton’s personal lawyer, David E. Kendall, who called them “absolutely false.” Mr. Trump has repeatedly mentioned past allegations against Mr. Clinton. On Tuesday, he wrote on Twitter that Mr. Clinton was “the WORST abuser of woman in U.S. political history.”

Donald Trump taps longtime D.C. operative for VP search<http://www.cbsnews.com/news/campaign-2016-donald-trump-taps-longtime-dc-operative-for-vice-president-search/>

CBS // EMILY SCHULTHEIS

Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump has hired lawyer A.B. Culvahouse Jr., a veteran Washington staffer, to help with his vice presidential search. CBS News has confirmed that Culvahouse, who vetted vice-presidential picks for 2008 GOP nominee John McCain and ultimately helped choose then-Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, met with Trump at Trump Tower in Manhattan this week. Culvahouse is also a former adviser to former President Ronald Reagan and has aided GOP nominees in five elections with their vice presidential searches. Trump has named multiple people to be involved in his search for a running mate, including campaign manager Corey Lewandowski and former GOP rival Ben Carson. The GOP businessman has said he will announce his vice presidential pick in July at the Republican convention in Cleveland. Trump has narrowed his list to approximately a half-dozen candidates with "deep political resumes," he told the Associated Press. He said he is placing a premium on a candidate who is able to help him navigate Washington.

Trump: It's an 'honor' that Obama has been talking about me<http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/280467-trump-its-an-honor-that-obama-has-been-talking-about-me>

THE HILL // HARPER NEIDIG

Republican presumptive nominee Donald Trump said it's an "honor" that President Obama has been calling him out lately. When asked about Obama's attacks in an interview with Fox News' "Hannity" Wednesday night, Trump said that he had come close to running against the president in 2012, but ultimately decided against it. He added that a friend had told him that Obama was privately worried about the prospect of facing Trump in an election. "I don't know if that was a good decision or a bad decision," he said. "I think it was actually — I think we're going to do great this time. I think I would have beaten him last time, frankly, had I decided to run." "I'm definitely on his mind. I mean every time he speaks, he mentions my name, which is an honor. I think it's probably not a bad thing," Trump added. Obama has been an outspoken critic of the Republican presumptive nominee's rhetoric and took aim at him during a commencement speech at Rutgers University on Sunday.

The Dying of the Third-Party Dream<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/opinion/campaign-stops/the-dying-of-the-third-party-dream.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // ROSS DOUTHAT

Of all the strange images of this strange campaign, I find myself particularly struck by this vision: Mitt Romney, pacing alone in one of his many houses, his angst evident in his faintly mussed-up hair, placing pleading phone calls to Republican politicians asking them to run as a third-party candidate against Donald Trump. That bizarre, existential one-act play — “Conversations About Trump,” opening Off Broadway, with Josh Brolin as Romney and the voice of William H. Macy as John Kasich — is apparently where the quest for a conservative alternative to Trump and Hillary Clinton ran into a wall. In the end, there isn’t going to be a convention walkout, the Republican Party isn’t going to fracture or go the way of the Whigs, and the elite constituency for a third-party run turned out to consist of a collection of pundits, a handful of strategists and the 2012 Republican nominee. Which is why Romney made those calls in vain. When the idea was first kicked around months ago, the main case for a third-party candidate was that the G.O.P. could actually benefit institutionally from an independent anti-Trump campaign — that it would help rescue down-ballot Republicans by giving anti-Trump conservatives a reason to turn out, and it might even help save the Republican brand from being permanently tarnished, permanently Trumpified.

Donald Trump’s Immigration Plan: Big Promises, Bigger Doubts<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/20/us/politics/donald-trump-immigration.html>

NEW YORK TIMES // JULIA PRESTON, ALAN RAPPEPORT AND MATT RICHTEL

Big promises are to be expected from presidential candidates, but reality often intrudes. The elder George Bush broke the “no new taxes” pledge that helped lead to his election. And Barack Obama’s administration has yet to live up to his prediction that his nomination would go down in history as the moment “when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal.” Donald J. Trump’s vow to restore what he says is America’s lost luster, while perhaps not as flowery, comes with campaign promises that are equally grandiose. But Mr. Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, has typically provided scant details on how he might make good on his promises — and ambitious ideas, even the concrete kind, do not always add up. Central to Mr. Trump’s campaign, and to his national security strategy, is his intent to clamp down on illegal immigration, using a vast deportation “force” to relocate people to the other side of a wall, funded by Mexico, that would stretch nearly the length of the southern border.

Republicans' new reality: Forever Trump<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-republican-party-supporters-223341>

POLITICO // KYLE CHENEY

Donald Trump’s Republican doubters like to think of him as an aberration, a one-time dalliance with a candidate who, once he’s defeated this fall, will be swept off the stage, leaving the GOP back in their rightful hands. They’re already wrong: Even if Trump never sets foot in the White House, his stamp on the Republican Party will linger long past 2016. Trump’s primary run spurred a string of like-minded allies to ride his coattails into positions of power within the Republican party, including seats on the Republican National Committee. With or without Trump, they — coupled with a host of conservative rabble-rousers swept in with the help of Ted Cruz — already marshal enough power within the party to change its course, whether the GOP establishment likes it or not. Adding staying power to the 2016 rebellion is the fact that many of the incoming RNC members have won 4-year terms, virtually guaranteeing they’ll exert significant influence over the Republican Party through the 2020 presidential election and possibly long after.

Trump’s business booms as he runs for president, financial disclosures show<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-business-booms-as-he-runs-for-president-financial-disclosures-show/2016/05/18/60adedb6-1d11-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // DREW HARWELL, ROSALIND S. HELDERMAN AND TOM HAMBURGER
Business has boomed in Donald Trump’s financial empire during the time he has run for president, according to an analysis of his federal disclosure forms. The documents, including a lengthy filing released Wednesday and one from last July, show that revenue has increased by what Trump campaign statements say is almost $190 million, with gains coming from golf courses to branded merchandise to book royalties. At his tony Florida resort Mar-a-Lago, revenue nearly doubled, climbing from about $16 million in 2014 and the first half of 2015 to about $30 million since the start of his campaign, according to the forms. Sales of his licensed bottled-water brand, Trump Ice, are up as well — from $280,000 last year to $413,000 this year, the forms show. “Crippled America,” his book published in November, made between $1 million and $5 million in royalties, he reported. The flood of cash highlights one of the most unusual aspects of Trump’s candidacy — the potential that a private businessman can benefit financially from a run for the White House. And it shows how his fortunes have evolved since last year, when his controversial comments about immigration and Muslims threatened to tarnish his business brand even if they boosted his political campaign.

Parties raise big money off disgust with Trump, Clinton<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/clinton-trump-party-fundraising-223343>

POLITICO // RACHEL BADE

One GOP email solicitation asks donors to pony up because of Hillary Clinton’s history of “attacking sexual harassment victims, defending an accused child rapist, [and] playing a major role in the Whitewater and Benghazi scandals.” A Democratic email highlights Donald Trump’s proposed ban on Muslim immigrants: “Stand with us and denounce Donald Trump’s bigoted plan.” Congressional Republicans and Democrats may despise the other party’s pick for the White House, but let’s face it: Trump and Clinton are great for business. The business, that is, of raising huge sums of money for the battle to control the Senate and House in 2017. Both Republican and Democratic congressional fundraising committees see major monetary promise in the other party’s candidates. For the right, Clinton’s endless cloud of controversies — from Whitewater to the ongoing FBI investigation of her email practices as secretary of state — offers a gold mine for their cash operations. Ditto for the left and Trump’s comments about deporting Hispanics, banning Muslims and punishing women who’ve had abortions.

Editorials/Op-Eds

Making Overtime Fair Again<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/opinion/making-overtime-fair-again.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&_r=0>

NEW YORK TIMES // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

In a long-needed move, the Obama administration issued new rules on Wednesday to restore the right to overtime pay for millions of salaried workers. Under federal law dating to 1938, an employer does not have to pay time-and-a-half when salaried employees work more than 40 hours a week if they earn enough to qualify as executives, professionals or administrators. The problem is that the salary threshold that defines a white-collar job — at least $455 a week, or $23,660 a year — has not been fully updated for inflation since 1975. As a result, workers who earn modest salaries are often deemed ineligible for overtime pay. The new rules, which take effect on Dec. 1, 2016, raise the threshold to $47,476. An estimated 4.2 million workers will become newly eligible for overtime and another nine million who should be earning overtime now (because of the nature of their work), but often don’t get it, will no longer be denied the pay that is rightfully theirs. In all, about one-third of salaried employees will be eligible for overtime pay under the new threshold, compared with a mere 7 percent currently.

After tensions explode in Nevada, it’s time for Sanders to be honest with his supporters<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/after-tensions-explode-in-nevada-its-time-for-sanders-to-be-honest-with-his-supporters/2016/05/18/f17c2468-1d2d-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

Tensions In the Democratic presidential race exploded in Nevada over the weekend. Supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) shouted, cursed and threw chairs during a state party convention in which they failed to force rules changes they wanted. Even though they were attempting to get more delegates than the caucus results in the state suggested they deserved, they attacked the process as unfair. The state party chair subsequently received death threats against her and her family. Mr. Sanders responded with self-righteousness and hypocrisy. He released a statement in which he listed a series of procedural complaints about the Nevada convention, attacked the Democratic Party for not being inclusive enough and warned that “millions of Americans are outraged” and that “the political world is changing.” He offered a throwaway line, three paragraphs down, condemning his supporters’ hooliganism in a statement that mostly justified it.

Russia neuters the media once again<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/russia-neuters-the-media-once-again/2016/05/18/d372f49a-1d0c-11e6-9c81-4be1c14fb8c8_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

While The space for independent journalism in Russia has narrowed dramatically in recent years, one organization seemed to buck the trend. It was called RBC and owned by the billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov, who had unsuccessfully run against President Vladimir Putin for the presidency in 2012. Mr. Prokhorov fared poorly in politics, winning only 8 percent of the vote, but RBC began to blossom in the past two years with something almost unheard of in today’s Russia: penetrating investigative reports and an ever-larger audience. On May 13, the hatchet fell. Three top editors resigned, including the editor in chief of the media group, Elizaveta Osetinskaya; editor of the RBC newspaper, Maxim Solyus; and editor of the RBC news agency, Roman Badanin. While the company praised the departing editors, other news reports said they were essentially forced out because of Kremlin displeasure with the organization’s reports and its growing popularity.

Maryland takes one step forward and one step back against opioids<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/maryland-takes-one-step-forward-and-step-back-against-opioids/2016/05/18/1b39a936-1939-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

No government — federal or state — can afford to ignore the nation’s destructive opioid abuse epidemic, and Maryland’s is no exception. The recently concluded General Assembly session resulted in a significant step forward, in the form of a bill requiring that all prescribers of opioids participate in the state’s Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) as a condition of their state licenses. In essence, a PDMP is a database that tracks patients’ past access to prescription opioids, enabling physicians to confirm or deny suspicions that a particular patient might be “doctor shopping” to fuel an addiction. With appropriate privacy protections, the programs may also help authorities identify doctors who are engaged in inappropriate or even illegal practices. Previously, Maryland’s PDMP had been voluntary, diminishing its practical impact; a General Assembly analysis showed that only about 10 percent of eligible doctors, pharmacists and other providers registered. In December, Gov. Larry Hogan’s (R) heroin and opioid abuse task force recommended making it mandatory. The new law, which takes full effect July 1, 2018, mandates that physicians not only consult the PDMP database before prescribing opioids but also do so on a sustained basis throughout their treatment of particular patients. Mr. Hogan’s signature on the bill, which passed both houses overwhelmingly, represents a promise kept for his administration.

Vladimir Putin’s Dangerous Obsession<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/opinion/vladimir-putins-dangerous-obsession.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

The United States and Russia are now proposing to drop food and other emergency aid from the air if President Bashar al-Assad of Syria does not allow trucks to deliver supplies to his besieged cities. Airdrops are a risky and desperate move — costly, hard to deliver accurately and, if poorly targeted, a threat to kill or injure the people they are supposed to help. On the surface the move seems a humanitarian gesture from two nations that are supposedly partners in ending Syria’s bloody civil war. What it really does is highlight, once again, the duplicity of President Vladimir Putin of Russia, in Syria and elsewhere. Mr. Assad remains in power largely because of Russian military assistance. It is hard to believe that Mr. Putin, who fancies himself a man who can get what he wants, could not persuade Mr. Assad to let aid get through to the cities if he chose to try. While promising Secretary of State John Kerry that he would work with America to end the war that has reportedly killed up to 470,000 people, Mr. Putin has been unable or unwilling to stop Mr. Assad from shelling civilians and, according to reports, is continuing Russian airstrikes as well. A temporary cease-fire that raised hopes for a more durable peace has now largely collapsed, talks between the Assad government and opposition forces have broken down and plans to begin a negotiated political transition to a more inclusive government by Aug. 1 seem ever more remote.