Subject: RE: New video: SCOTUS #DoYourJob explainer
From: "Crystal, Andy" <[email-masked]>
To: "Christopher, Rebecca" <[email-masked]>, "Miranda, Luis" <[email-masked]>, Corinne Matti <[email-masked]>
Cc: Video-Vetting_d <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:20:01 -0700

Awesome, but can we take out Paul Ryan in the GOP Senate bouquet? Maybe add in Cornyn instead.

From: Christopher, Rebecca
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 3:16 PM
To: Christopher, Rebecca; Crystal, Andy; Miranda, Luis; Corinne Matti
Cc: Video-Vetting_d
Subject: Re: New video: SCOTUS #DoYourJob explainer

Hi everyone! Check out this cut — script is approved by Graham and our wonderful volunteer has passed vet (but please let me know if you have any questions!)

From: Rebecca Christopher <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 10:49 AM
To: "Crystal, Andy" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, "Miranda, Luis" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Corinne Matti <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Cc: Video-Vetting_d <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: Re: New video: SCOTUS #DoYourJob explainer

I’m asking Pratt about being in this video (will depend on scheduling) but we’re also considering using actors in our network, since the piece won’t need the narrator to be any type of real life authority — ideally we’ll try to film tomorrow.

Waiting to hear from Graham on legal!

From: "Crystal, Andy" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 9:39 AM
To: "Miranda, Luis" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Rebecca Christopher <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Corinne Matti <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Cc: Video-Vetting_d <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: RE: New video: SCOTUS #DoYourJob explainer

Looks great, just one small ed attached. I also endorse Pratt.

From: Miranda, Luis
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 6:31 PM
To: Christopher, Rebecca; Corinne Matti
Cc: Video-Vetting_d
Subject: RE: New video: SCOTUS #DoYourJob explainer

I like this. Pratt could be a good host, but would ask him to grow out his beard for gravitas.

This line will need to be edited.

Ever since Justice Scalia’s passing, the judicial branch has been in a difficult position. With only eight judges the court can’t break a tie. ​And​ Americans deserve a functional Supreme Court.

My suggestions but Pratt and Graham Wilson will need to review:

Ever since Justice Scalia’s passing, the Supreme Court has had to operate with only eight judges. Without the 9th vote, cases could deadlock on a 4-4 tie. And if Republicans get their way the court would go on that way for two full terms, this year and next. The American people deserve a fully functional Supreme Court.

________________________________
From: Christopher, Rebecca
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 1:59 PM
To: Corinne Matti
Cc: Video-Vetting_d
Subject: Re: New video: SCOTUS #DoYourJob explainer
Hi there, just wanted to check in on this and see if I can answer any questions — thanks!

From: Rebecca Christopher <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Monday, April 11, 2016 at 5:59 PM
To: Corinne Matti <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Cc: Video-Vetting_d <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: Re: New video: SCOTUS #DoYourJob explainer

We’re looking at a couple folks, depends on how soon we can schedule!

From: Corinne Matti <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Monday, April 11, 2016 at 5:25 PM
To: Rebecca Christopher <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Cc: Video-Vetting_d <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: Re: New video: SCOTUS #DoYourJob explainer

Who is playing the host?

On Apr 11, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Christopher, Rebecca <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:

Hi everyone,

Attached is a script for a video we’d like to do that functions as an update on SCOTUS — let me know how it’s looking and thanks!
<SCOTUSsenateexplainer.docx>