Subject: DNC Clips 5.16.2016
From: "Price, Jenna" <[email-masked]>
To: "Price, Jenna" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 04:24:11 -0700

WEATHER: 63F, Cloudy

POTUS and the Administration

Obama assails Trump’s wall in Rutgers commencement speech<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-assails-trumps-wall-in-rutgers-commencement-speech/2016/05/15/b9afc1fa-1acd-11e6-8c7b-6931e66333e7_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // GREG JAFFE

President Obama delivered a commencement address at Rutgers University on Sunday that steered clear of the typical graduation advice and sounded a lot like a tough, aggressive takedown of the Republican presidential front-runner. The president, who spoke before a crowd of more than 50,000 in the school’s football stadium here, called on the graduates to reject politicians who hark back to better days. The 45-minute-long address was filled with obvious jabs at Republican front-runner Donald Trump, whom the president didn’t name but who was a foil for the graduation speech’s most cutting applause lines. Obama slammed Trump’s proposal to build a wall along the country’s southern border, saying the world is becoming ever more interconnected and “building walls won’t change that.”

Obama to graduates: Building walls won't make world better<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/obama-rutgers-commencement-speech-trump-223197>

POLITICO // SARAH WHEATON

President Barack Obama used the Trump-sized audience at the Rutgers University graduation ceremony on Sunday to launch his first anti-Trump rally of the campaign season. Speaking to more than 50,000 people in the state university’s football stadium, Obama did not say Donald Trump’s name, but it didn’t take a newly conferred doctorate to know whom the president was talking about when he rejected “building a wall” and anti-intellectualism. “The world is more interconnected than ever before. Building walls won’t change that,” Obama said to applause, and he went on to attack positions the presumptive Republican nominee holds, like opposition to trade deals and plans to bar Muslims from entering the United States.

Obama Swipes at Trump, but Doesn’t Name Him, in Speech at Rutgers<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/us/politics/obama-swipes-at-trump-but-doesnt-name-him-in-speech-at-rutgers.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // GARDINER HARRIS

President Obama took several sharp swipes at Donald J. Trump on Sunday during a commencement address that could be the beginning of a forceful effort to help elect a Democratic successor as president. Addressing Rutgers University’s class of 2016 at the school’s 250th anniversary commencement, Mr. Obama never mentioned Mr. Trump by name. But his target was clear, and his assessments earned raucous cheers from the graduates. “The world is more interconnected than ever before, and it’s becoming more connected every day,” Mr. Obama told the graduates. “Building walls won’t change that.”

Obama’s Pivot to Asia Staggers as Trade Deal Stalls in Congress<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-15/obama-s-pivot-to-asia-staggers-as-trade-deal-stalls-in-congress>

BLOOMBERG // ANGELA GREILING KEANE

The vessel was once part of a 12-cutter Coast Guard fleet known for requiring never-ending maintenance to stay afloat. Now, it’s a tangible example of Obama’s attempt to reorient U.S. foreign policy toward Asia and confront Chinese expansion in the Pacific. The gift of the 50-year-old Coast Guard cutter shows the difficulty of turning U.S. military and economic focus toward the part of the world Obama believes is most vital to America’s future. A sweeping trade deal with 11 Pacific-Rim nations, considered critical to the strategy, is in danger of rejection by the U.S. Congress. And China, the chief U.S. rival in the region, is aggressively pursuing territorial claims and increasing its belligerence toward U.S. friends and allies, including the Philippines, Japan and Vietnam. “By any stretch, our policy’s failed because China has responded to our coercion with resistance,” said Robert Ross, a Boston College political science professor who specializes in China. “The situation in Asia is clearly worse than it was eight years ago.”

Obama in Vietnam Will Focus on Future, Rather Than the Past<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/us/politics/obama-in-vietnam-will-focus-on-future-rather-than-the-past.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // GARDINER HARRIS

The pictures will be unavoidable, and the flood of painful memories unstoppable. When President Obama lands next Sunday in Hanoi, his visit will be chronicled by photographers, cameramen and journalists who will track every public move of only the third presidential visit to Vietnam since the end of the American war there. Mr. Obama’s former defense secretary, Chuck Hagel, said he is already bracing for the onslaught of recollections those pictures and articles are likely to inspire. “I know those images will hit me,” said Mr. Hagel, whose 12 months as a soldier in Vietnam remain the defining period of his life, despite the subsequent years as both a senator and a cabinet secretary. “They’re going to make it all come back.”

Top Currency Traders Warn White House Race May Echo Brexit Chaos<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-15/top-currency-traders-warn-white-house-race-may-echo-brexit-chaos>

BLOOMBERG // RACHEL EVANS

Traders wanting to know what November’s U.S. presidential election will mean for the dollar need look no further than the U.K. The pound plunged to a seven-year low and volatility soared, exceeding all other Group-of-10 nations, on risks created by a referendum on European Union membership. Given the tough talk on dollar strength from candidates vying for the White House, the greenback is just as vulnerable to politics, according to Deutsche Bank AG, JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Standard Bank Group Ltd. Republicans and Democrats have each accused China of purposely weakening its currency to gain a trade advantage, reflecting voter unease linked to a 14 percent slide in manufacturing jobs during the past decade. As rhetoric becomes action, countries that have sought more competitive exchange rates will be in the firing line, spurring foreign-exchange volatility, Deutsche Bank’s Alan Ruskin said in a May 6 note. China, Japan and Germany were placed on a currency manipulator watch list by the Treasury Department last month.

Stevens says Supreme Court decision on voter ID was correct, but maybe not right<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/stevens-says-supreme-court-decision-on-voter-id-was-correct-but-maybe-not-right/2016/05/15/9683c51c-193f-11e6-9e16-2e5a123aac62_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // ROBERT BARNES

In the rapid expansion of states with voter-identification laws and the backlash of litigation that always follows, there is one constant from proponents: that the Supreme Court already has declared them constitutional. The court ruled in 2008 that Indiana’s requirement for a photo ID was legal, with none other than liberal justice John Paul Stevens writing what was described as the “lead opinion” in a fractured 6-to-3 ruling. But in the years since, Stevens — who retired from the court in 2010 — has never seemed comfortable with his role in the case. And he recently expressed doubts again about whether he had all the information he needed in reaching what he called a “fairly unfortunate decision.”

How Elon Musk exposed billions in questionable Pentagon spending<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/elon-musk-rocket-defense-223161>

POLITICO // MATTHEW NUSSBAUM

Elon Musk’s SpaceX had to sue before it got access to the Pentagon — but now, as it promises to deliver cargo into space at less than half the cost of the military’s favored contractor, it has pulled back the curtain on tens of billions in potentially unnecessary military spending. The entrenched contractor, a joint operation of Boeing and Lockheed Martin called the United Launch Alliance, has conducted 106 space launches all but flawlessly, but the cost for each is more than $350 million, according to the Government Accountability Office. SpaceX promises launches for less than $100 million. Yet despite the potentially more cost-effective alternative, taxpayers will be paying the price for ULA’s contracts for years to come, POLITICO has found. Estimates show that, through 2030, the cost of the Pentagon’s launch program will hit $70 billion — one of the most expensive programs within the Defense Department. And even if ULA is never awarded another government contract, it will continue to collect billions of dollars — including an $800 million annual retainer — as it completes launches that were awarded before Musk’s company was allowed to compete. That includes a block buy of 36 launches awarded in 2013.

Why the Senate Doesn't Have to Act on Merrick Garland's Nomination<http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/05/senate-obama-merrick-garland-supreme-court-nominee/482733/>

THE ATLANTIC // MICHAEL D. RAMSEY

Does the Senate have to hold hearings and a vote on President Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to the U.S. Supreme Court? The Constitution says that unless the Senate gives advice and consent Garland cannot be appointed, but it does not require the Senate to do anything in response to the nomination. The relevant text is the appointments clause of Article II, Section 2, which provides: “[The president] shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States…” This language makes the Senate’s consent a prerequisite to presidential appointments, but it does not place any duty on the Senate to act nor describe how it should proceed in its decision-making process. Even if the word “shall” in the clause is read as mandatory, “shall” refers only to things the president does. Instead, the Senate’s core role in appointments is as a check on the president, which it exercises by not giving consent—a choice it can make simply by not acting.

Courts may play pivotal role on voting rights in 2016 election<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/05/15/voting-rights-election-lawsuits-supreme-court-democrats-republicans/84151084/>

USA TODAY // RICHARD WOLF

The Supreme Court decided a presidential election 16 years ago based on how votes were counted. This year, a shorthanded court seeking to avoid the limelight may help decide who can vote in the first place. Petitions challenging restrictions on voting in key states could reach the high court before Election Day, putting the justices exactly where they don't want to be — at the fulcrum of American politics in what promises to be a wild race for the White House. Chief Justice John Roberts' court has itself to thank for some of the laws enacted after the justices struck down a key part of the Voting Rights Act in 2013. Those laws impose new rules for registering and voting that could limit access to the polls for minorities and young people in particular — the coalition that propelled Barack Obama to the White House in 2008 and 2012. Since the court's 5-4 decision in Bush v. Gore ended a dispute over Florida's vote count in George W. Bush's favor, the justices have intervened regularly in elections. They allowed Ohio Republicans to challenge voters at the polls in 2004. They upheld Indiana's photo identification law in 2008. Two years ago, they let restrictions passed by Republican legislatures stand in North Carolina, Ohio and Texas while blocking them in Wisconsin.

Obama didn’t birth Trump’s movement<https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obama-didnt-birth-trumps-movement/2016/05/15/438aa786-193a-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // E.J. DIONNE JR

Blaming President Obama for the rise of Donald Trump is popular among Republican leaders. They don’t want to take responsibility for the choices made by their own voters or their complicity in tolerating and even encouraging the extremism Trump represents. They also don’t want to face the fact that many Trump ballots were aimed at them. It should be said that many conservatives are resisting the Blame-Obama-First temptation by trying to come to terms with what has happened to their cause. National Review’s Ramesh Ponnuru offered an admirably sober assessment of his side’s role in Trump’s emergence that included this observation: “We have come to reward the expression of resentment and anger more than the mastery of public policy.” This is an accurate and powerful critique of a movement that once claimed to have all the new ideas. Now their main insight is that Obama is wrong about everything. The Wall Street Journal drew on dialectic to editorialize on the Obama-leads-to-Trump concept: “Every thesis creates its antithesis.”

Former officials to promote Merrick Garland at Dem forum<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/merrick-garland-senate-democrats-promote-223203>

POLITICO // SEUNG MIN KIM

Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland won’t be appearing before senators anytime soon for his confirmation hearing. So Senate Democrats are trying for the next best thing. Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee will host a forum Wednesday featuring former top legal and government officials who know Garland personally and who will testify on behalf of the veteran jurist’s legal acumen and personal character. Among the names who’ll appear at the event: Abner Mikva, the former Democratic congressman and Clinton White House counsel who, like Garland, served as the chief judge of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. “The public discussion we are convening this week allows senators, the press, and the public to learn more about this highly qualified nominee and the importance of a fully functioning Supreme Court,” said Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, who will formally announce the event later Monday. “I hope all senators will join us for this public meeting.”

Democrats

Security Concerns End Nevada Democrats' Convention<http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/security-concerns-end-nevada-democrats-convention-39134128>
ABC NEWS // MICHELE RINDELLS
The Nevada Democratic Convention turned into an unruly and unpredictable event, after tension with organizers led to some Bernie Sanders supporters throwing chairs and to security clearing the room, organizers said. Friction between Bernie Sanders' supporters and state Democratic Party leaders had flared throughout the day on Saturday. The convention was scheduled to end by 7 p.m. and when it hadn't wrapped up by 10 p.m., authorities at the Paris Las Vegas casino informed party organizers they could no longer provide the security necessary to handle the crowd. Sanders national communications director Michael Briggs didn't have immediate comment on the events in Nevada when reached by phone on Sunday morning. The hostilities began when Sanders supporters accused state party leaders of putting them at a disadvantage, and they objected to procedural votes to approve the rules of the event on Saturday.

Pelosi still withholding Clinton endorsement<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/nancy-pelosi-hillary-clinton-endorsement-223191>

POLITICO // RACHEL BADE

Both senators from California have endorsed Hillary Clinton for president, and almost every congressional Democratic leader has, too. But there’s still one glaring holdout from the party’s embrace of its all-but-certain nominee: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. The San Francisco Democrat has yet to throw her support behind Clinton against Bernie Sanders, despite rising anxiety among Democrats that the party needs to close ranks and focus on beating Donald Trump. And with Pelosi’s home-state California primary just around the corner on June 7, the lack of an endorsement from one of the party’s most recognizable figures has become increasingly noticeable. A source familiar with Pelosi’s thinking says she fears that favoring one candidate over the other before the nomination battle is officially settled could depress voter turnout and make it harder to unite the party after the convention. There’s also the fact that Pelosi represents a liberal hotbed with a big contingent of Sanders backers. “I love Hillary Clinton, and I think she’s going to be a great president,” Pelosi told Politico in the Capitol on Friday, before quickly cutting off an interview. “I am not talking to you about the timing of my endorsement. … I feel very confident she will be president.”

Dem party chief: ‘We’re ready for Trump’<file:///C:\Users\PriceJ\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\Content.Outlook\CQR00TNK\V>

THE HILL // KYLE BALLUCK

Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz late Saturday said Democrats need to treat Donald Trump’s candidacy as a “real threat.” “At the DNC we are not going to make the same mistake his Republican opponents made,” she said at the Alaska State Convention, according to prepared remarks. “We’re ready for Trump.” The Florida congresswoman said Democrats will hold the presumptive Republican presidential nominee accountable “for the damage he’s doing as a candidate and the damage he’s promising he would do as president.” Wasserman Shultz said Trump, Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) are “getting ready to sing ‘kumbaya’ and give us everything they’ve got” after a “nasty, mud-slinging primary.”

Dem rep: Trump 'not even sincere about his own bigotry'<http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/279957-dem-rep-on-trump-hes-not-even-sincere-about-his-own-bigotry>

THE HILL // REBECCA SAVRANSKY

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) on Sunday slammed Donald Trump for comments he made last week, noting everything the presumptive GOP presidential nominee says right now is a "suggestion." "It just goes to prove that he even lies about his own bigotry," Ellison said on ABC's "This Week." "He says he doesn’t know who David Duke is. When he, 10 years before, had denounced David Duke. But when it was in his interest to play coy in the Louisiana primary, he acts like, 'Oh, I don't know who David Duke is.' He's not even serious about that." Trump was asked last week about saying his proposed ban on Muslims entering the country was "just a suggestion." "Yeah. It was a suggestion," Trump said in response. "Look, anything I say right now — I'm not the president — everything is a suggestion, no matter what you say, it's a suggestion."

Centrist Democrats: We can work with President Trump<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-moderate-democrats-223168>

POLITICO // BURGESS EVERETT AND SEUNG MIN KIM

As Democrats portray Donald Trump as a dangerous leader for his party, most of them barely acknowledge he could be president. But some centrist Democrats say they’re ready and willing to work with the business mogul should he defeat their party’s nominee. “The people will have a chance to vote. If Donald Trump is elected president there will be a great opportunity to sit down and have a conversation about what that agenda looks like,” explained Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), who has long backed Hillary Clinton. “If he’s president, we’re going to have disagreement. But we’d better all figure out how to come up with an agenda for the American people.” Getting ready for a potential Trump presidency in their home states may just be good politics for moderate senators such as Heitkamp, Jon Tester of Montana and West Virginia’s Joe Manchin. They’ll be top targets for Republicans in 2018, a midterm year that could favor the GOP if recent trends of lower turnouts in nonpresidential elections continue. And it’s a good bet that they’ll need Trump voters to keep their jobs.

Castro moves to stop VP fire from the left<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/julian-castro-veep-housing-223202>
POLITICO // EDWARD-ISAAC DOVERE
Targeted by progressive activists hoping to kill his chances of being picked as Hillary Clinton’s running mate, Julián Castro is set this week to announce changes to what’s become a hot-button Housing and Urban Development program for selling bad mortgages on its books. The changes, which stakeholders and activists will be briefed on in a call with HUD officials on Monday, could be made public as early as Tuesday — depending on when department lawyers give the green light for publishing them in the Federal Register. But they won’t take effect before the next auction of HUD mortgages, scheduled for May 18. Castro’s actions could potentially defuse an issue that activists have been using to question his progressive credentials—and he’d be doing it just at the moment that the running mate search has begun to get serious at Clinton campaign headquarters. Among the changes, according to people with knowledge of what’s coming: the Federal Housing Authority will put out a new plan requiring investors to offer principal reduction for all occupied loans, start a new requirement that all loan modifications be fixed for at least five years and limit any subsequent increase to 1 percent per year, and create a “walk-away prohibition” to block any purchaser of single-family mortgages from abandoning lower-value properties in the hopes of preventing neighborhood blight.

Republicans

Top Republicans Say Donald Trump is Changing the Political Playbook<http://www.wsj.com/articles/top-republicans-say-donald-trump-is-changing-the-political-playbook-1463339320>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // MELANIE TROTTMAN AND ANDREW ACKERMAN

Top Republicans said Sunday that Donald Trump has changed the political playbook to such an extent that voters may not care that much about issues like his taxes or other episodes from his past. “Donald Trump represents such a massive change to how things are done in Washington that people don’t look at…whether or not he releases his taxes or what this story was of 30 years ago,” Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus told ABC on Sunday, referring to a Washington Post report that decades ago Mr. Trump masqueraded as a publicist representing himself. A top aide to Mr. Trump, Paul Manafort, said on CNN that the billionaire businessman has denied claims he passed himself off as his own publicist. Mr. Priebus said in television interviews Sunday that reports about Mr. Trump’s past are less relevant to voters than the stark change they want in Washington.

Social Conservatives, However Reluctant, Are Warming to the Idea of Donald Trump<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/us/politics/donald-trump-conservatives.html?ref=politics&_r=0>

NEW YORK TIMES // JEREMY W. PETERS

Activists and leaders in the social conservative movement, after spending most of the past year opposing and condemning Donald J. Trump, are now moving to embrace his candidacy and are joining the growing number of mainstream Republicans who appear ready to coalesce around the party’s presumptive nominee. Though their support for Mr. Trump is often qualified, this change of heart is one of the more remarkable turns in an erratic and precedent-defying Republican campaign. It reflects the sense among many Republicans that, flawed as they may see him, the thrice-married billionaire is preferable to the alternative. “Oh, my, it’s difficult,” said Penny Nance, the president of Concerned Women for America, a group that has openly campaigned against Mr. Trump. “He’s not my first choice. He’s not my second choice,” she added. “But any concerns I have about him pale in contrast to Hillary Clinton.”

Republican Split Is Deeper Than Ideology<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/us/politics/trump-ryan-republican-split.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // ALBERT HUNT

Odds are that Donald J. Trump and Speaker Paul Ryan will eventually patch together a rapprochement. Their well-established substantive differences on trade, immigration and entitlements should not be a barrier. There is plenty of room to fudge a unified Republican agenda, especially with Mr. Trump, whose positions and even principles often seem to evolve as he deems politically necessary. But it is harder to see how their basic approaches to politics can coexist comfortably. Mr. Ryan is the leading practitioner of an optimistic conservatism that reaches out and is inclusive. Mr. Trump has emerged as the presumptive Republican nominee by skillfully appealing to an angry and alienated conservative base that is driven in part by racial and ethnic fears. The Trump-Ryan schism can be best understood by looking at two proxies: former Representative Jack Kemp, the 1996 Republican vice-presidential nominee who was Mr. Ryan’s mentor and political role model, and former Speaker Newt Gingrich, who is being considered as Mr. Trump’s running mate.

Reince Priebus Urges G.O.P. Unity Behind Trump<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/us/politics/reince-priebus-donald-trump.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // ASHLEY PARKER

Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, urged unity behind Donald J. Trump in a series of interviews on Sunday television shows and said that “people just don’t care” about recent negative reports about his tax returns and his treatment of women. During an appearance on “Fox News Sunday,” Mr. Priebus defended Mr. Trump after an article in The New York Times on Saturday in which dozens of women who encountered Mr. Trump over his career told of unsettling conduct. Asked by Chris Wallace, the host, if he was bothered by the accusations in the article, Mr. Priebus at first said that “Well, you know, a lot of things bother me, Chris, and obviously I’m the wrong person to be asking that particular question,” but when asked again, Mr. Priebus said that voters were focused on other things.

Puerto Rico debt becomes constitutional fight on the right<http://thehill.com/policy/finance/279837-puerto-rico-debt-becomes-constitutional-fight-on-the-right>

THE HILL // SYLVAN LANE AND PETER SCHROEDER

Republicans are waging a battle over the Constitution when it comes to helping Puerto Rico. Supporters of Speaker Paul Ryan’s legislation to help Puerto Rico handle billions in debt before a critical July bond payment deadline point to Article IV of the Constitution in arguing they have a responsibility to help the territory. Article IV stipulates that Congress has power “to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory.” Conservatives, never shy about a constitutional debate, have a counter-argument. Many on the right don’t want to pass the Ryan-backed measure because they believe Puerto Rico’s financial problems are its own. Though the House measure wouldn’t send any tax dollars to Puerto Rico, they argue further U.S. involvement could lead to a bailout. They also say the framers were a bit muddy with their language on U.S. obligations to territories.

RNC chair says third-party bid would be ‘suicide mission’ for U.S.<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/15/rnc-chair-says-third-party-bid-would-be-suicide-mission-for-u-s/>

WASHINGTON POST // ELISE VIEBECK

The head of the Republican National Committee denounced efforts to draft an independent candidate to run against Donald Trump as a "suicide mission" that could "wreck" the United States for generations. RNC Chairman Reince Priebus did not mince words as he urged party figures laying the groundwork for a third-party bid to suspend their operation. "They can try to hijack another party and get on the ballot, but, look, it's a suicide mission for our country because what it means is that you're throwing down not just eight years of the White House but potentially 100 years on the Supreme Court and wrecking this country for many generations," Priebus said on "Fox News Sunday."

Ron Johnson Compares Tough Re-Election Bid To 9/11 Attacks<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ron-johnson-9-11-attacks_us_57388a1ee4b077d4d6f34fef?utm_hp_ref=politics>

HUFFINGTON POST // IGOR BOBIC

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) wants you to vote as if your life depends on it. Speaking at the Wisconsin GOP convention on Saturday, Johnson recalled how passengers on United Airlines Flight 93 took a vote among themselves before bravely storming the cockpit to fight the al Qaeda hijackers on Sept. 11, 2001. “We’ve all heard Todd Beamer’s iconic words ‘Let’s roll,’” Johnson said, according to The Associated Press. “How American is that? We have a job to do, let’s roll up our shirt sleeves. Let’s get it done.” He then compared the flight — which crashed in a Pennsylvania field, killing all 44 people aboard — to the election.

RNC Chair Says ‘People Just Don’t Care’ About Reports Donald Trump Mistreated Women<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/reince-priebus-donald-trump-women_us_573875eee4b060aa781a8971?utm_hp_ref=politics>

HUFFINGTON POST // LAURA BARRON-LOPEZ

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus on Sunday said voters don’t care about reports that the party’s presumptive presidential nominee has disrespected women and made unwelcome advances toward them in the workplace. A New York Times investigation published Saturday included dozens of interviews with women and men who worked with Donald Trump over decades, detailing crude comments about the female form, disturbing workplace conduct and more. “All these stories that come out — and they come out every couple weeks — people just don’t care,” Priebus said when questioned about the NYT report on “Fox News Sunday.” “I think people look at Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton and say, ‘Who’s going to bring an earthquake to D.C.?’”

Priebus ducks questions about Trump’s character<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/15/priebus-ducks-questions-about-trumps-character/>

WASHINGTON POST // ELISE VIEBECK

The head of the Republican National Committee played down criticism of Donald Trump's character after new reports chronicled his troubling behavior toward dozens of women and his past habit of impersonating a publicist to boast about his private life. A visibly uncomfortable Reince Priebus defended Trump in three Sunday talk show interviews, arguing that questions about Trump's integrity do not matter to supporters of the presumptive GOP presidential nominee and refusing to say whether they should. "It's something that Donald Trump is going to have to answer questions in regard to," Priebus said on "Fox News Sunday."

Priebus: Trump 'will have to answer for' behavior toward women<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/women-reince-priebus-donald-trump-223189>

POLITICO // ISAAC ARNSDORF

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus passed off questions about Donald Trump's behavior toward women to the presumptive nominee himself. "These are things that he's going to have to answer for," Priebus said Sunday morning on ABC's "This Week With George Stephanopoulos." "I don’t think Donald Trump is being judged based on his personal life. I think people are judging Donald Trump as to whether or not he’s someone that’s going to go to Washington and shake things up. And that’s why he’s doing so well." He blamed Hillary Clinton and her supporters for planting the concerns. "It's when people live in glass houses and throw stones is when people get in trouble," Priebus said. "It’s a classic Clinton operation. Now suddenly these things are coming out."

Facebook's Zuckerberg to meet conservatives on political bias flap<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-bias-idUSKCN0Y60S7>

REUTERS // MARCY NICHOLSON

Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg will meet this week with prominent conservatives in the media, a spokesman said on Sunday, to address allegations of political bias at the popular social networking site. Some 12 "conservative thought leaders" will join the meeting with Zuckerberg on Wednesday, a Facebook spokesman said. Among the invitees are media personality Glenn Beck, Fox News Channel's "The Five" co-host Dana Perino and Zac Moffatt, co-founder of Targeted Victory, a technology company that aims to bring transparency to media buying. Facebook came under fire last week when an unnamed former employee told technology news website Gizmodo that workers often omitted conservative political stories from the company's "trending" list of topics.

New immigration battle for Sessions<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/senate-sessions-immigration-223201>

POLITICO // SEUNG MIN KIM

The Senate’s toughest immigration critic is teeing up his latest battle: Fighting visas for low-skilled workers. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) is sending a letter to top Senate appropriators, urging them to reject a quiet yet active push to expand the number of visas available for low-skilled foreign workers in government funding bills. Sessions was irate after the omnibus bill that hastily passed Congress in December included a provision that would essentially quadruple the number of H-2B visas available. The letter, obtained by POLITICO, is an early marker from Sessions against doing so again in this year’s government funding bills. “It is my understanding that certain members of the Senate seek to make this ‘returning worker’ exemption permanent,” Sessions wrote in the letter, addressed to Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) and Maryland Sen. Barbara Mikulski, the panel’s top Democrat. “Doing so would be a grave error. Fundamentally, a cap must be a cap.” Immigrants with an H-2B visa — for instance, landscapers, housekeepers and seafood processors — can work legally in the United States up to only 10 months at a time before they have to return to their home countries. The total is capped at 66,000 visas per year.

The return of John Boehner<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/john-boehner-return-223194>

POLITICO // JAKE SHERMAN

John Boehner is back. The former House speaker will spend late July and all of August on a cross-country bus trip raising money and campaigning for House Republicans, according to multiple sources familiar with his plans. The trip — on Boehner’s bus, dubbed “Freedom One” — will begin after the Republican National Convention in Cleveland and end Labor Day weekend. Boehner has done these trips for years, but it is especially significant that the former speaker — who left Congress after being targeted by House conservatives — is spending his summer campaigning less than a year after leaving office. It’s the latest sign that although Boehner may be gone from Congress, he hasn’t shed the political bug. “The August bus trips aboard Freedom One became an annual ritual during his years in office,” said David Schnittger, a longtime aide to Boehner who now serves as his spokesman. “He liked getting out into congressional districts around the country, talking to people and helping his colleagues. It’s not something he has to do anymore — but he likes doing it, and there’s still a demand for it, so why not keep doing it? It’s just a part of who he is.” The trip will begin in New Jersey and go all the way to Washington state. Boehner has a dozen events lined up already for incumbent members of Congress, and his team is in the midst of setting up more, including for candidates who are not yet elected.

A Republican Congresswoman Has Personal Stake in Transgender Debate<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/us/florida-congresswoman-has-personal-stake-in-transgender-debate.html?ref=politics>

NEW YORK TIMES // LIZETTE ALVAREZ

The day Rodrigo Heng-Lehtinen told his prominent parents about his new gender identity, he did so in a letter that he left on their bed. Then he grabbed a packed bag and, unsure of whether he would be welcomed back, went to a friend’s house to see if his family would love him or leave him. His shocked parents, Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Miami Republican, and Dexter Lehtinen, who served as the top federal prosecutor here, did not hesitate. They grabbed the phone and told him that they loved him and that family trumped all, and asked him to come home. But as with many parents of transgender children, they were also overwhelmed by fear: The future they saw for their then 21-year-old, whom they had named Amanda, would be pockmarked with discrimination and bullying, if not outright violence. It was this visceral reaction to want to protect her child that drove Ms. Ros-Lehtinen to break from her party’s skepticism or hostility on gay and transgender issues — a stance evident now in North Carolina’s battle over transgender bathroom visits — and become a conspicuous advocate in Congress and more recently in public service announcements. On Monday, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, her husband and her son, now 30, will appear in the latest one for SAVE, a longtime South Florida gay rights group that hopes to engage the Latino community here.

This is actually happening. Senators are doing their jobs, moving bipartisan bills.<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/05/16/this-is-actually-happening-senators-are-doing-their-jobs-moving-bipartisan-bills/>

WASHINGTON POST // KELSEY SNELL

In a political year notable for its rancor, the Senate is finding a rare bit of harmony when it comes to its spending work. Last week, senators on a 90-to-8 vote passed the chamber’s first spending bill of the year — one that funds energy and water infrastructure programs — and this week the Senate is set to quickly consider a package of two bills that would provide spending for veterans, transportation, housing and military constructions agencies. To top it off, a bipartisan deal on funds to combat the spread of the Zika virus is set for a vote Tuesday. “The basic work of the Senate and the Congress and the House is to pass the funding bills,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said last week. “That’s what we’re going to be doing here from now until July 15th.” The progress so far on appropriations work is notable when compared with recent years when contentious stalemates over spending became the Senate norm, necessitating tense year-end budget deals crafted with the threat of a government shutdown hanging overhead. It becomes even more notable when compared with the House’s inability to agree on what to do with its spending bills due to internal squabbling among Republicans over the budget cap for the 12 annual appropriations bills.

Some Congressional Republicans See Re-election Path in Opioid Bills<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/17/us/politics/some-congressional-republicans-see-re-election-path-in-opioid-bills.html>

NEW YORK TIMES // JENNIFER STEINHAUER

It is a situation that would have been unthinkable a decade ago, but some House and Senate Republicans are placing part of their re-election strategies in sponsoring and passing bills to help drug addicts. This week, the House and Senate are expected to begin work on a conference committee to reconcile a batch of bills passed in the two chambers aimed at helping people addicted to heroin and opioids. Last week, the House passed 18 opioid bills, giving an array of vulnerable House Republicans measures to attach their names to. That comes on the heels of a single bill that passed overwhelmingly in the Senate in March, authorizing money for various treatment and prevention programs for a broad spectrum of addicts, including those in prison. The pure scope of the epidemic motivates lawmakers. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, drug overdose was the leading cause of injury death in 2013, the most recent data available, among Americans ages 25 to 64, surpassing deaths by motor vehicle crashes; 71 percent of the overdoses involved opioid painkillers.

2016 Democrats

Georgia poll shows tight presidential race<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/georgia-trump-clinton-sanders-223195>

POLITICO // KIRSTEN EAST

A new poll of Georgia voters finds Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton nearly tied in a general election matchup. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll shows Trump with a 4-point lead over Clinton, 45 percent to 41 percent, which is within the poll’s 4.26 percentage point margin of error. The sentiments expressed by independents further contribute to the statistical tie between the two presumptive nominees. Independents in Georgia were evenly split between the two candidates, with 13 percent saying they were undecided or don’t support either candidate. Mirroring several recent polls, Bernie Sanders polled higher than Clinton in a general election meeting with Trump. Sanders — now a long shot to become the Democratic nominee — bests Trump 47 percent to 42 percent in a hypothetical contest. Sanders also had the highest favorability rating (47 percent), compared with 40 percent for Trump and 31 for Clinton.

Hillary Clinton Fights for a Win in Kentucky<http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-fights-for-a-win-in-kentucky-1463355435>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // LAURA MECKLER

Democrat Hillary Clinton made a final push in Kentucky ahead of Tuesday’s presidential primary, looking to snap a losing streak against Sen. Bernie Sanders while battling a second front against Republican Donald Trump. After all but conceding the past couple contests, Mrs. Clinton mounted a real campaign here. By Tuesday she is scheduled to have appeared at 11 events over three trips, including her visits to a pair of African-American churches Sunday morning. Her campaign also was on the air with TV ads. Mr. Sanders also campaigned this weekend in Kentucky, hoping to build on back-to-back wins in Indiana and West Virginia. Both campaigns said Kentucky was more competitive than Tuesday’s other contest, in Oregon, where Mr. Sanders is favored. A two-state defeat might not meaningfully change Mrs. Clinton’s delegate advantage, but it would be embarrassing for her to continue losing states and further proof that a substantial slice of Democrats aren’t satisfied with her as the nominee and are drawn to Mr. Sanders’s more populist message.

Hillary Clinton gets more specific about what Bill Clinton’s White House job could be<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/15/hillary-clinton-gets-more-specific-about-what-bill-clintons-white-house-job-could-be/>

WASHINGTON POST // ABBY PHILLIP

Hillary Clinton has already made it pretty clear that her husband, former president Bill Clinton, is unlikely to spend his days in the White House picking out the china during her potential administration. On Sunday, she got a little more specific about what he would be doing: fixing the economy. "My husband ... I'm going to put in charge of revitalizing the economy because you know, he knows how to do it," Clinton told supporters in Northern Kentucky. "And especially in places like coal country and inner cities and other parts of our country that have been really left out."

Clinton’s top five vice presidential picks<http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/279944-snls-trump-and-christie-pick-a-vp>

THE HILL // AMIE PARNES

Hillary Clinton is nearing the end of a long Democratic primary that will almost certainly leave her as the party’s presidential nominee. It has also revealed weaknesses that Clinton will need to fix in order to defeat presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump in the fall. Picking the right vice presidential candidate will be a key decision for Clinton as she looks to strengthen her campaign for the fall. Here are the candidates getting the most buzz in Clintonworld.

Even supporters agree: Clinton has weaknesses as a candidate. What can she do?<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/even-supporters-agree-clinton-has-weaknesses-as-a-candidate-what-can-she-do/2016/05/15/132f4d7e-1874-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // ANNE GEARAN AND DAN BALZ

Hillary Clinton’s declining personal image, ongoing battle to break free of the challenge from Sen. Bernie Sanders and struggle to adapt to an anti-establishment mood among voters this year have become caution signs for her campaign and the focus of new efforts to fortify her position as she prepares for a bruising general election. More than a dozen Clinton allies identified weaknesses in her candidacy that may erode her prospects to defeat Donald Trump, including poor showings with young women, untrustworthiness, unlikability and a lackluster style on the stump. Supporters also worry that she is a conventional candidate in an unconventional election in which voters clearly favor renegades. “I bring it down to one thing and one thing only, and that is likability,” said Peter Hart, a Democratic pollster who has conducted a series of focus groups for the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.

Clinton caught in end-of-the-primary trap<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/clinton-caught-in-end-of-the-primary-trap-223199>

POLITICO // GABRIEL DEBENEDETTI

There are no ads ripping Donald Trump on the swing state airwaves, and no formal Republicans-for-Hillary effort has surfaced. Trumpet-blaring shows of Democratic Party unity are nonexistent. Other than a daily stream of news releases, surrogate calls, Web videos and campaign trail broadsides, the public turn toward Trump by Hillary Clinton’s campaign in the two weeks since he became the presumptive GOP nominee has been a far cry from the kind of scorched earth offensive that’s likely to be necessary to stop him this fall. It’s not entirely Clinton’s fault. Her hands are tied. She can’t switch her campaign apparatus into general-election mode because of the risk of alienating Bernie Sanders’ supporters, who continue to hold out hope that he will emerge as the Democratic nominee. She can’t organize disaffected Republicans without exposing herself to criticism from liberals who already accuse Clinton of being too far to the right. Then there’s the ongoing primary: Short of the magic delegate number in her fight against Sanders, she’s still forced to burn ad dollars in places like Kentucky, a state that holds a Democratic primary Tuesday but won’t be competitive in November.

Hillary Clinton Looks to Avoid Convention Fight as Bernie Sanders Presses Agenda<http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-looks-to-avoid-convention-fight-as-sanders-presses-agenda-1463178735>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // LAURA MECKLER

Looking to avoid a messy Democratic convention this summer, people close to likely nominee Hillary Clinton predict she will give Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders much of what he wants on the party’s platform. But at least for now, the Sanders forces are itching for a fight. Already, Mr. Sanders has accused the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee of stacking convention committees in favor of the former secretary of state and has threatened a floor fight if he isn’t treated fairly. “This convention should be a real debating place about what the party is and what it should stand for,” said Larry Cohen, a Sanders adviser and retired labor leader.

America’s speed date with Bernie Sanders<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/05/15/americas-speed-date-with-bernie-sanders/>

WASHINGTON POST // PHILIP BUMP

When Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont announced his candidacy last spring, he trailed Hillary Clinton by 56 points in national polling. He had the support of less than 6 percent of Democrats. How many of those Democrats were residents of Vermont is hard to say, but it's pretty safe to assume that part of Sanders's low poll numbers were the fact that, to most Americans, he was one of the vast majority of the United States of whom they'd never heard. That changed. Quickly. Gallup conducts regular polling on how Americans view presidential candidates, asking respondents whether they view politicians favorably or unfavorably. There's a third option, too; people can tell Gallup whether they've never heard of the candidate. And using that metric, we can get a good sense for how quickly (or slowly) awareness of presidential candidates spread across the country. There are three types of candidates. There are candidates of whom no one has ever heard, such as Sanders. There are candidates that are somewhat well-known, as was John McCain in 2008. And there are candidates who everyone knows, such as Hillary Clinton this year.

Clinton team looking for a VP who will be fighter, excite Sanders supporters<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/05/15/hillary-clinton-running-mate-democrat-vice-president/84288814/>

USA TODAY // HEIDI M. PRZYBYLA
Hillary Clinton is considering a running mate who could make a direct appeal to supporters of Bernie Sanders, bridging a generational and political divide, according to four people close to the campaign. Clinton’s chief requirements include a candidate’s resume and a fighter capable of hand-to-hand combat with Trump. The campaign’s vetting also prioritizes demographics over someone from a key swing state as she seeks to unify the Democratic voting base, said the individuals coordinating with the campaign, who were not authorized to speak on the record about early deliberations. The Vermont senator shows no signs of easing off before the July convention, and Democrats worry he’ll make only measured contributions in helping her court his voters between August and November. The Clinton campaign declined to comment on the story. One obvious candidate who would fit the Sanders anti-Wall Street populist profile is Elizabeth Warren, the Massachusetts senator who’s been in a Twitter war with Republican Donald Trump. Her tweetstorm during the past week shows she’s capable of being the kind of scrappy surrogate Clinton needs to take him on. But Warren has also been critical of Clinton, including in a book; and the two have not been close.  Yet in the past candidates have moved past similar tensions. George H.W. Bush called Ronald Reagan's economic plan "voodoo economics." They were White House partners for eight years.

Is Sanders 2016 Becoming Nader 2000?<http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/is-sanders-2016-becoming-nader-2000-213893>
POLITICO // BILL SCHER
Bernie Sanders, for all his talk of revolution, never wanted to be Ralph Nader. He has long history of keeping the Democratic Party at arms length, but he also has a long history of rejecting spoiler bids. Since 1992, he has always endorsed the Democratic presidential nomine, snubbing Nader’s four left-wing third-party campaigns. He became a Democrat to run for president instead of keeping his “(I)” and following in Nader’s footsteps. He has pledged to support Hillary Clinton if she wins the Democratic nomination and has ripped Donald Trump at every opportunity. But even if Sanders isn’t deliberately trying to replicate the electoral trauma inflicted by Nader in 2000—when he probably cost Al Gore the presidency—Bernie’s lingering presence in the Democratic primary threatens to produce a similar result in November: delegitimizing the eventual Democratic nominee in the eyes of the left and sending many critics, if not to Trump, then to the Green Party’s Jill Stein or the Libertarian Party’s Gary Johnson. In the first poll to assess the impact of third-party candidates, Public Policy Polling found last week that the inclusion of Stein and Johnson shaves two percentage points off Clinton’s lead over Trump. Conversely, the minor party duo loses a combined two points when Sanders is tested as the Democratic nominee, indicating that Sanders’ voters account for Clinton’s reduced standing.

Hillary Clinton Outlines Economic Plans, Which Include Her Husband<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/us/politics/hillary-clinton-bill-clinton-economic-plans-kentucky.html?ref=politics>
NEW YORK TIMES // THOMAS KAPLAN
Hillary Clinton already has an assignment for her husband, Bill Clinton, if they return to the White House next year. The former president, Mrs. Clinton told voters on Sunday, will be “in charge of revitalizing the economy.” “Because, you know, he knows how to do it,” she said. “Especially in places like coal country and inner-cities and other parts of our country that have really been left out.” Mrs. Clinton mentioned her idea for her husband while speaking at a rally outside a home in northern Kentucky. Earlier this month, she said she had told Mr. Clinton that he would need to “come out of retirement” to help put people back to work. Mrs. Clinton spent Sunday campaigning in Kentucky ahead of its Democratic primary on Tuesday. At the rally here, she cited the economic success of her husband’s presidency while outlining her own plans. She also emphasized her commitment to supporting workers in the coal industry, which has a major presence in Kentucky, just as it does in West Virginia, where Mrs. Clinton lost the primary last week to Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

Hillary Clinton Plans to Pin Down Donald Trump on Policy<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-16/hillary-clinton-plans-to-pin-down-donald-trump-on-policy>
BLOOMBERG // MICHAEL C. BENDER

As Hillary Clinton's campaign focuses its attacks on presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump, she faces the challenge of pinning down someone who rapidly shifts positions on issues, sometimes within a single day. The Republican's evasiveness confounded his primary rivals, who one by one ceded their greatest advantages as they tried to compete with Trump for the media spotlight.  Now, Clinton, the likely Democratic nominee, is attempting to use Trump's shape-shifting to convince voters that he's too much of a risk. Whether Clinton can succeed where Trump's Republican opponents failed will depend on how well she can target her fellow New Yorker for what he's actually proposed, without being drawn into the former reality television star's circus.“We’re going to pin him down by taking him at his word, and making his words count,” said Joel Benenson, a senior strategist for Clinton’s campaign. “It’s reinforcing what people believe about him—that Trump is always about Trump.”

2016 Republican

Donald Trump Wouldn’t Have Had the Ready Cash to Self-Finance Entire Campaign — Analysis<http://www.wsj.com/articles/self-financing-campaign-all-the-way-would-have-been-a-stretch-for-trump-1463341722>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // PETER GRANT AND BRODY MULLINS

Donald Trump, after long saying his self-financed campaign shielded him from special interests, is preparing to start raising large donations. He reversed course, he said in early May, to ensure his campaign has the resources to compete with Hillary Clinton. It might seem a strange reason for a man who says he is worth $10 billion. But a close analysis of Mr. Trump’s finances shows that in terms of ready cash, he would be ill-equipped to foot the bill himself. When his campaign began last summer, a financial disclosure Mr. Trump filed said he had between about $78 million and $232 million in cash and relatively liquid assets such as stocks and bonds.

When Donald Trump brought Miss Universe to Moscow<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-russia-moscow-miss-universe-223173>

POLITICO // MICHAEL CROWLEY

On June 18, 2013, Donald Trump had some exciting news: He would soon be whisking dozens of the world’s most beautiful women to Russia. “The Miss Universe Pageant will be broadcast live from MOSCOW, RUSSIA on November 9th,” Trump tweeted that day, referring to the beauty pageant he owned at the time. “A big deal that will bring our countries together!” And maybe not just the countries, Trump said: “Do you think Putin will be going to The Miss Universe Pageant,” he tweeted later that day. “[I]f so, will he become my new best friend?” Now that he’s headed for the Republican presidential nomination, Trump talks often about establishing warmer relations with Vladimir Putin. That’s a sharp break from the Washington establishment consensus for punishing Russia’s president over his policies in Ukraine and Syria.

Trump Targeting Crossover Support to Remake U.S. Election Map<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-15/trump-targeting-crossover-support-to-remake-u-s-election-map>

BLOOMBERG // ROS KRASNY

The “crossover support” that presumptive nominee Donald Trump has attracted in winning Republican primaries this year will help him compete in states that have gone Democratic for decades in presidential elections, according to a top aide. “We are in the process now of organizing the framework for the strategy of our general election campaign,” Paul Manafort, Trump’s convention manager, said on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday. Michigan, Pennsylvania, Maine and Connecticut could all vote for Trump in November, he said. Each state last voted for a Republican in 1988, electing George H.W. Bush. New Hampshire, which has voted Democratic in five of the last six contests, will “for sure” be a possibility for the real estate developer turned politician, Manafort said.

Trump ally Roger Stone predicts success with Sanders supporters<http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/279932-trump-ally-predicts-success-winning-over-sanders>

THE HILL // HARPER NEIDIG

An ally to the Donald Trump campaign predicted that the presumptive GOP presidential nominee would have major success with a large chunk of Bernie Sanders’s supporters in a general election. In a radio interview with John Catsimatidis on Sunday, Republican consultant Roger Stone said Sanders has created a lot of excitement among the electorate and that similarities between the Vermont senator and Trump will lead some Democrats to support the GOP candidate. “Look, I think Bernie Sanders has to get some of the credit for this,” Stone said. “In essence, he’s the outsider in the Democratic Party. In some ways, he and Trump have a great deal in common, particularly their rejection of these enormous globalist trade deals like [the North American Free Trade Agreement] and [the Trans-Pacific Partnership] and [the Trade Promotion Authority] that either have, or will, destroy the U.S. job market.

Manafort: 'No reason' for Trump to change<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/paul-manafort-donald-trump-tape-223187>

POLITICO // ISAAC ARNSDORF

Donald Trump doesn’t need to change his rhetoric or tone to win in a general election, his senior adviser said Sunday morning. Trump already appeals to a broad electorate, drawing crossover Democrats and independents, Paul Manafort told CNN’s Jake Tapper. Manafort said House Speaker Paul Ryan, in his meeting with Trump last week, did not pressure the presumptive Republican nominee to act more presidential. “There’s no reason for Donald Trump to change,” Manafort said. Manafort also tried to downplay assorted controversies hounding Trump over the past week.

Carson says Christie, Cruz, Kasich, Rubio and Palin are on Trump’s shortlist for VP<https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-vp-shortlist-cruz-palin-152539923.html>

YAHOO NEWS // DYLAN STABLEFORD

Ben Carson says Donald Trump’s list of possible running mates includes some awfully familiar names for anyone who’s followed the 2016 presidential race: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. “Those are all people on our list,” Carson told the Washington Post. The retired neurosurgeon, who endorsed Trump after dropping his own presidential bid, said that while he’s a member of the presumptive Republican nominee’s vice presidential search committee, he has no interest in being considered himself. Carson “understands he’s a lightning rod for controversy,” the newspaper reported, “and Trump doesn’t need help sparking fires.”

Trump Running-Mate Speculation Rife as Possible Choices Speak<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-05-15/trump-running-mate-speculation-rife-as-possible-choices-speak>

BLOOMBERG // BEN BRODY

Donald Trump has said he probably won’t name a running mate until July. That hasn’t stopped speculation on who the presumptive Republican presidential nominee will select for his unconventional ticket. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who’s been talked about as among those Trump is considering, said Sunday he wouldn’t give “an automatic yes” if approached but suggested he would be interested. “If he can convince Callista and me that it’s doable and that it’s serious, and that we would in fact contribute, I think we’d be very hard-pressed not to say yes,” Gingrich said on “Fox News Sunday,” referring to his wife.

Gingrich Is Open to Being Vice President<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/05/15/gingrich-is-open-to-being-vice-president/>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // ANDREW ACKERMAN

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said he could be “lured’ into running as Donald Trump’s vice president, though the presumptive Republican nominee would first have to get the ex-congressman’s wife on board. “If he can convince Callista and me that it’s doable and it’s serious and that we would in fact contribute, I think we’d be very hard pressed not to say ‘yes,’ ” Mr. Gingrich said on “Fox News Sunday.” For Mr. Trump, his running-mate choice could be the most important signal that he is seeking to unify the GOP as the fractured party works to coalesce around its unorthodox candidate. Mr. Gingrich has been one of Mr. Trump’s most prominent supporters. “I don’t think it’s an automatic yes,” Mr. Gingrich said. “I think you have to think through what does he think the job involves.”

Is Ben Carson the worst or the best surrogate of all time? Yes.<https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/is-ben-carson-the-worst-or-the-best-surrogate-of-all-time-yes/2016/05/13/0afc3c52-17ac-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html?postshare=5341463314177503&tid=ss_tw>

WASHINGTON POST // BEN TERRIS

Ben Carson, the neurosurgeon turned presidential candidate turned unfiltered pitchman for Donald Trump and now part of the presumptive nominee’s vice presidential search committee, sat in the back of a Town Car with his wife, Candy, on his way to a televised interview. He had just explained to the reporter riding along that he wanted no role in a Trump administration when news arrived of a new poll naming him as the best liked of a list of potential running mates. “Who else was on the list?” he asked quietly, maintaining his usual inscrutable calm. The most favorably regarded contenders after himself, he was told, were John Kasich, Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin and Chris Christie. “Those are all people on our list,” he said. “Well, not you,” Candy reminded him sharply.

Trump aide dismisses audio tape as Democrats raise character issue<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-idUSKCN0Y60KE>

REUTERS // GINGER GIBSON AND DAVID LAWDER

A top aide to Donald Trump said on Sunday he did not believe the Republican presidential front-runner posed as his own spokesman to brag about his personal life, a controversy that came as Democrats sharpen their attacks on the billionaire's character. The Washington Post released an audio recording on Friday of a man who identified himself as Trump publicist "John Miller" and talked about the real estate tycoon's romantic encounters in a 1991 conversation with a People magazine reporter. After listening to the tape while appearing on CNN's "State of the Union" show, senior Trump adviser Paul Manafort said he did not believe it was the Republican candidate's voice despite his past admissions of sometimes using a pseudonym.

Donald Trump: Brexit would not impact US trade deal<http://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-brexit-would-not-impact-us-trade-dea-2016-americal/>

POLITICO // JULES JOHNSON

Republican likely presidential nominee Donald Trump said on Sunday that Brexit would not have an impact on trade between the U.S. and Britain – if he was in the White House, of course. Speaking to ITV’s Piers Morgan, Trump said that he had “big investments” in the U.K. but added that he had “no preference” on the outcome of the June 23 referendum on Britain’s future in or outside of the European Union. He added that he intends to “treat everybody fairly, but it wouldn’t make any difference to me whether they were in the EU or not.” “I think if I were from Britain, I would probably not want it. I’d want to go back to a different system,” he said in the interview, which will air Monday on Morgan’s breakfast show.

Ivana Trump says it's 'hard' for family on campaign trail<http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/279972-ivana-trump-says-its-hard-for-her-kids-to-be-out-on-the>

THE HILL // REBECCA SAVRANSKY

Ivana Trump said it's difficult for her children to be out on the trail campaigning for their father so often. “It’s very hard for them because they all have families,” Ivana Trump told Page Six at the Fashion Institute of Technology Gala. “Donald Jr. has five kids and a wife and he has to be on the trail. Ivanka has three kids, she just gave the birth to another baby. And Eric has a wife," she said. "It’s very, very stressful for them, because they have to follow and support him.” Trump's kids, Ivanka, Donald Jr. and Eric, often join presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump on the trail to campaign for their father.

Donald Trump’s Plans Don’t Add Up. Do Voters Care?<http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/05/13/donald-trumps-plans-dont-add-up-do-voters-care/>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // GREG IP

Donald Trump would slash taxes by trillions of dollars, leave entitlements alone, boost spending on infrastructure and defense, and, claims an advisor, deliver a budget surplus of $4.5 trillion to $7 trillion. There is no credible way to reconcile these claims. Mr. Trump’s proposals will, if enacted, dramatically raise the debt, not decrease it, much less produce a surplus. Politically, though, it doesn’t appear to matter. As Mr. Trump understands well, voters care a lot less than wonks and journalists do about policy details. Mr. Trump and Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton’s competitor for the Democratic nomination, are riding high not because of their policies but because they aren’t the establishment. This affords both men extraordinary freedom to make more extravagant promises than their more arithmetically deferential rivals. It also enables Mr. Trump to change those positions at will to neutralize his rivals’ lines of attack. In others, this would be called flip-flopping or prevarication. To Mr. Trump’s supporters, it’s candor. “He talks before he thinks,” one supporter said, “so he doesn’t have time to think up something and lie to you.”

Trump backers face 'scam PAC' charges<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/scammers-feast-of-trump-fundraising-disarray-223141>

POLITICO // ISAAC ARNSDORF AND KENNETH P. VOGEL

As Donald Trump rushes to start collecting the $1 billion expected to be necessary to compete for the White House, one of his biggest challenges may come from those claiming to support him. An increasing number of unauthorized groups are invoking the presumptive GOP nominee’s name to raise money, suggesting that they’ll use the cash to support his campaign, even as some appear to be spending most of their money on contracts with favored consultants. Trump’s campaign and its allies worry that the groups are doing little to help the campaign, and may be doing more harm than good by siphoning off cash that would otherwise go to the campaign’s fledgling fundraising effort. The campaign has disavowed several of the groups, demanding they stop using the candidate’s name in fundraising appeals and calling at least one super PAC founded by a Trump adviser a “big-league scam.” But appeals keep coming from other groups, with more now joining the scrum, and rival groups accusing one other of being scams. Legal changes and technological developments have paved the way for an explosion of political non-profit groups, including super PACs, which have rushed to raise money with very little oversight about how they spend it, leading to charges and counter-charges of profiteering.

Trump: Bad for the Jewish Republicans?<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/donald-trump-jewish-republicans-223196>
POLITICO // KATIE GLUECK
Republicans had thought that after eight years of rancor between the Obama administration and the Israeli government, 2016 would be the year American Jews began to abandon the Democratic Party. But the conservatives who worked for years to win over Jewish voters now say Donald Trump is driving them away. “Without question, I think there were probably more Jews willing to jump over to the Republican aisle, precisely because of the Iran deal and the Republican Party’s staunch opposition to it,” said Noam Neusner, a former speechwriter for George W. Bush, who also served as a Bush White House Jewish liaison and worked for Jeb Bush. “But I don’t think the opportunity exists anymore, largely because Trump is just anathema to many Jews, including Jewish conservatives.” It wasn’t supposed to be like this in 2016. While nearly every campaign cycle sees largely unfounded speculation that the Republican Party is poised to pick up more Jewish votes, over the last four years, poll numbers gave Republicans reason to believe that more Jewish voters were poised to join their ranks.

Trump’s Asymmetric Warfare<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/opinion/trumps-asymmetric-warfare.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // CHARLES M. BLOW

It has been somewhat fascinating and sometimes fun to watch Elizabeth Warren do battle with Donald Trump in alternating salvos of tweets, but in the end I fear that this approach of trying to “beat a bully,” as Warren put it in one of her tweets, is a futile effort. There is no way to sufficiently sully a pig or mock a clown. The effort only draws one further onto the opponent’s turf and away from one’s own principles and priorities. There is no way to shame a man who lacks conscience or to embarrass an embarrassment. Trump is smart enough to know what he lacks — substance — and to know what he possesses in abundance — insolence. So long as he steers clear of his own weakness and draws others in to the brier patch that is his comfort, he wins. As MSNBC’s Chris Matthews said in December, this is asymmetric warfare. Conventional forms of political fighting won’t work on this man. Truth holds little power, and the media is still enthralled by the monster it made.

What Atlantic City Casino Workers Know About the Trump Brand<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/opinion/what-atlantic-city-casino-workers-know-about-the-trump-brand.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // FRANCIS X. CLINES

As a cocktail waitress for 27 years in this city’s Xanadu of a casino industry, Valerie McMorris learned the hard way that Donald Trump’s art of the deal too often proved to be the art of bankruptcy. “I’ve been through three bankruptcies with Mr. Trump,” she said, recalling how the fast years of gambling growth here degenerated into a crushing excess of casinos. She watched as Mr. Trump hurried to remove “TRUMP” from the facades of suddenly failing casinos, lest they undermine his claims to financial invincibility. The self-branding mania that has helped Mr. Trump earn his victory as the presumed Republican candidate for president has not worked here. Ms. McMorris, a union representative for Unite Here Local 54 of the city’s casino workers, is fascinated by how his political winning streak plays out just beyond a battered Atlantic City, a destination once identified with Mr. Trump that serves now as a reality check. His name has disappeared from three casinos, one of which has closed. Across the city, casino workers have lost pensions and health care in bankruptcy proceedings, and four of 12 casinos closed in recent years, with thousands of jobs lost. Home foreclosures are multiplying and the city has suffered such a precipitous loss in revenue that the state is threatening a takeover.

Little Is Off Limits as Donald Trump Plans Attacks on Hillary Clinton<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/17/us/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton.html>

NEW YORK TIMES // PATRICK HEALY

Donald J. Trump plans to throw Bill Clinton’s infidelities in Hillary Clinton’s face on live television during the presidential debates this fall, questioning whether she enabled his behavior and sought to discredit the women involved. Mr. Trump will try to hold her accountable for security lapses at the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and for the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens there. And he intends to portray Mrs. Clinton as fundamentally corrupt, invoking everything from her cattle futures trades in the late 1970s to the federal investigation into her email practices as secretary of state. Drawing on psychological warfare tactics that Mr. Trump used to defeat “Lyin’ Ted” Cruz, “Little Marco” Rubio and “Low-Energy” Jeb Bush in the Republican primaries, the Trump campaign is mapping out character attacks on the Clintons to try to increase their negative poll ratings and bait them into making political mistakes, according to interviews with Mr. Trump and his advisers.

Billionaires lining up for Trump aren’t sure where to send their money<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/billionaires-lining-up-for-trump-arent-sure-where-to-send-their-money/2016/05/15/aa7896e2-1953-11e6-9e16-2e5a123aac62_story.html>

WASHINGTON POST // MATEA GOLD

Leading Republicans are increasingly anxious that presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump is lagging far behind Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton when it comes to having an organized network of big-money allies, triggering a chaotic scramble to set up a clear super PAC structure. Because Trump condemned such entities throughout the primary contest, there is no dominant group ready to channel the resources of the billionaires lining up to back him, including casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, who has signaled plans to inject tens of millions into the race.  That leaves Trump advisers, GOP strategists and major donors puzzling over a key strategic question: Where should the six- and seven-figure contributions go? Clinton’s allies have built a deeply funded constellation of independent groups, and her main super PAC is readying a $130 million ad blitz that will kick off just weeks from now. The fundraising imbalance is acute: The top three super PACs supporting Clinton had collected about $80 million through the end of March, compared with just $8 million by several potential Republican presidential players including American Crossroads, according to Federal Election Commission filings.

Make America Great Again for the People It Was Great for Already<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/opinion/campaign-stops/make-america-great-again-for-the-people-it-was-great-for-already.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // BRYCE COVERT

Donald J. Trump has promised to Make America Great Again, and people have listened. He is the presumptive Republican nominee. He got there with that one consistent campaign imperative splashed across his website, on loud red baseball caps, on stickers, yard signs and other slogan-ready paraphernalia. This is the one true, unwavering message Mr. Trump offers his supporters. He may avoid direct answers on his taxes, but he has never backtracked on the need to return the country to its previous glory. Which America is he promising to us? If you ask his supporters, they say life has gotten worse for people like them over the last 50 years. It seems safe to assume that, in the eyes of Mr. Trump’s overwhelmingly white male fans, America was greater a half-century ago. Indeed, it was pretty great — for them. It’s not just that factory jobs were more plentiful or that women and minorities were largely kept from positions of power. Large national programs that radically changed the country kept America great specifically for white men. New Deal-era systems like Social Security and unemployment insurance; rules that demarcated minimum wages and maximum work hours and protected unionization; and the G.I. Bill at the end of World War II substantially transformed the country and created a booming middle class. But they all purposefully left out most women and minorities.

Trump fires back at Cameron: 'I'm not stupid, OK?'<http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-david-cameron-223204>

POLITICO // NICK GASS

If Donald Trump becomes the president of the United States, the country's long-standing "special relationship" with the United Kingdom could sour, if the presumptive Republican nominee's statements in an interview with British television are a reliable indication. During an interview with media ally Piers Morgan on ITV's "Good Morning Britain" aired Monday, Trump responded to comments from Prime Minister David Cameron, who called his proposal to temporarily ban all Muslims from the United States "divisive, stupid and wrong." "Well, number one, I’m not stupid, OK? I can tell you that right now," Trump said. "Just the opposite. Number two, in terms of divisive, I don’t think I’m a divisive person. I’m a unifier, unlike our president now, I’m a unifier." Morgan broached the possibility of Trump and Cameron both leading their respective countries. “Looks like we’re not going to have a very good relationship. Who knows?" Trump said, before quickly adding, "I hope to have a good relationship with him. But it sounds like he’s not willing to address the problem either.” As for the recent comments by London Mayor Sadiq Khan, who said he hoped Trump loses the general election, Trump appeared personally offended.

Editorials/Op-Eds

Mr. Trump, release your tax returns: Our view<http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/05/15/donald-trump-tax-returns-hillary-clinton-editorials-debates/84254136/>

USA TODAY // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

What’s Donald Trump hiding by refusing to release his tax returns, the way every major party nominee has done for the past four decades? That the presumed Republican nominee is not as wealthy as he claims? That he uses aggressive tax-avoidance schemes? That he doesn't give much cash to charity? Whatever the reasons, Trump’s constantly changing positions about his returns — gonna release them, can't release them, want to release them, might release them — raise suspicions that he’s concealing something. On Friday, he went so far as to tell ABC's Good Morning America that his tax rates are "none of your business." Well, actually, they are because Americans have the right to know whether someone who wants to lead the nation pays what he owes, is free of financial conflicts of interest and gives generously to worthy causes.

. . . And Donald Trump’s Taxes<http://www.wsj.com/articles/and-donald-trumps-taxes-1463178897>

WALL STREET JOURNAL // EDITORIAL BOARD

These columns warned Republican voters that Democrats and the media would make an issue of Donald Trump’s tax returns—after he was the GOP’s presumptive nominee—and that didn’t take long. This week Hillary Clinton began what is likely to be a campaign from here to November to claim the businessman must be hiding something. Mr. Trump is helping the Democrats with his changing answers and obfuscation. In January the candidate said “I have everything all approved and very beautiful” and he hoped to release his returns “over the next three, four months.” He later said he couldn’t release his returns until the IRS finished auditing him, though the IRS says an audit is no barrier to public disclosure. Asked this week by the Associated Press when that day would come, Mr. Trump said he didn’t plan to release them after all. After Mrs. Clinton and Mitt Romney criticized that statement, Mr. Trump fell back on the IRS audit excuse. Then on Friday on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” Mr. Trump said he didn’t think voters had any right to see his tax returns and that his tax rate is “none of your business.”

Mrs. Clinton, and your speeches?: Our view<http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/05/15/hillary-clinton-speech-transcripts-great-recession-editorials-debates/84253192/>

USA TODAY // EDITORIAL BOARD

Give Hillary Clinton credit for chutzpah. Clinton is demanding that Donald Trump disclose his tax returns, even as she refuses to release the transcripts of her highly paid speeches to Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street bankers. Clinton has it half-right. Trump, the presumed Republican nominee for president, should release income returns, just as Clinton did months ago in her campaign for the Democratic nomination, because transparency ought to be the norm for anyone seeking the highest office in the land. In Clinton's case, full disclosure should include letting the public know what she said to the bankers — especially because she has repeatedly promised to “rein in Wall Street” if she is elected president.

Congress Wakes Up to the Opioid Epidemic<http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/16/opinion/congress-wakes-up-to-the-opioid-epidemic.html?ref=opinion>

NEW YORK TIMES // THE EDITORIAL BOARD

The opioid epidemic is now a leading cause of death in the United States, ravaging communities across the country. At last, Congress has snapped to attention. But its recent flurry of legislation will be of little help unless lawmakers are willing to fund treatment and prevention programs. The House last week passed 18 bills related to opioids, and the Senate approved a comprehensive bill in March. The bills, which will be reconciled in a conference committee, are overdue. Opioids, a category of drugs that includes heroin and prescription painkillers like oxycodone, killed more than 28,000 people in 2014, and the rate of overdoses has tripled since 2000, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Almost two million Americans abused or were dependent on these drugs in 2014. The question now is whether Congress will appropriate enough money to address the scale of the problem. Democrats are seeking $600 million, and President Obama has asked for $1.1 billion. Republican leaders have not said how much they would be willing to spend, but insist that the total be offset by reductions in other programs or increases in revenue. The country is facing a health emergency, and it would be tragic if a self-imposed budget rule got in the way of a robust federal response.