Subject: EVENT: Clinton aide deposition schedule in Judicial Watch case
From: "Brinster, Jeremy" <[email-masked]>
To: Comm_D <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 09:23:20 -0700

h/t Collin

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-announces-schedule-deposition-testimony-clinton-email-lawsuit/

First Witness to Testify Wednesday

(Washington, DC) - Judicial Watch announced today that it has scheduled<http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-huma-employment-notice-deposition-schedule-01363/> the depositions<https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-federal-court-allows-discovery-to-begin-in-clinton-email-case/> of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's top aides Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, as well as top State Department official Patrick Kennedy, and former State IT employee Bryan Pagliano regarding the creation and operation of Clinton's non-government email system.  The first witness, Lewis A. Lukens, will be deposed on Wednesday, May 18.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan granted "discovery<https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/JW-v-State-joint-discovery-plan-01363.pdf>" to Judicial Watch into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's email system. The court noted that "based on information learned during discovery, the deposition of Mrs. Clinton may be necessary."  The discovery arises in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit<https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/citing-misconduct-and-misrepresentation-by-hillary-clinton-and-state-department-judicial-watch-asks-federal-court-to-reopen-lawsuit-seeking-information-on-top-clinton-aide-huma-abedin/> that seeks records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton.  The lawsuit, which seeks records regarding the authorization for Abedin to engage in outside employment while employed by the Department of State, was reopened<https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/clinton-aide-huma-abedin/> because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State<http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/huma-employment/> (No. 1:13-cv-01363)).

The Clinton email witnesses are scheduled to be deposed by Judicial Watch attorneys for as long as seven hours:

May 18 - Lewis A. Lukens, deputy assistant secretary of state and executive director of the State Department's Executive Secretariat from 2008 to 2011, who emailed with Patrick Kennedy and Cheryl Mills about setting up a computer for Clinton to check her clintonemail.com email account.

 May 27 - Cheryl D. Mills, Clinton's chief of staff throughout her four years as secretary of state.

 June 3 - Stephen D. Mull, executive secretary of the State Department from June 2009 to October 2012, who suggested that Clinton be issued a State Department BlackBerry, which would protect her identity and would also be subject to FOIA requests.

June 6 - Bryan Pagliano, State Department Schedule C employee who has been reported to have serviced and maintained the server that hosted the "clintonemail.com" system during Clinton's tenure as secretary of state.

June 8 - 30(b)(6) deposition(s) of the State Department regarding the processing of FOIA requests, including Judicial Watch's FOIA request, for emails of Clinton and Abedin both during Clinton's tenure as secretary of state and after.

June 28 - Huma Abedin, Clinton's deputy chief of staff and a senior advisor to Clinton throughout her four years as secretary of state and also had an email account on clintonemail.com.

June 29 - Patrick F. Kennedy, undersecretary for management since 2007 and the secretary of state's principal advisor on management issues, including technology and information services.

In a separate FOIA lawsuit concerning Hillary Clinton and the Benghazi terrorist attack, U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth ruled<http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-second-federal-court-grants-discovery-in-clinton-email-case/> Judicial Watch can conduct discovery into the email practices of Clinton and her top aides.  Judge Lamberth ordered Judicial Watch to follow up with his court once Judge Sullivan issued his discovery order:

When Judge Sullivan issues a discovery order, the plaintiff shall - within ten days thereafter-file its specific proposed order detailing what additional proposed discovery, tailored to this case, it seeks to have this Court order.  Defendant shall respond ten days after plaintiff's submission.

Judicial Watch filed its discovery plan yesterday with Judge Lamberth.

"This court-order testimony could finally reveal new truths about how Hillary Clinton and the Obama State Department subverted the Freedom of the Information Act," stated Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton.

For full case history on the Abedin employment lawsuit, click here<https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/tag/huma-employment/>.