Subject: RE: FW: For approval: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails
From: "Freundlich, Christina" <[email-masked]>
To: "Lykins, Tyler" <[email-masked]>, "Brinster, Jeremy" <[email-masked]>, "Dieter, Austin" <[email-masked]>, "Crystal, Andy" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 12:17:58 -0700

Hahahaha

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM -0700, "Dieter, Austin" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:

What we have here is a classic battle between in-house counsel and counsel on retainer

From: Freundlich, Christina
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 3:00 PM
To: Lykins, Tyler; Brinster, Jeremy; Dieter, Austin; Crystal, Andy
Subject: Re: FW: For approval: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails

Gahhhhhh

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 11:53 AM -0700, "Crystal, Andy" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
I really just want to say a researcher and an actual lawyer put all of this together…

Begin forwarded message:
From: "Lopez, Jacquelyn K.  (Perkins Coie)" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: May 21, 2016 at 2:25:23 PM EDT
To: "Reif, Eric" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Cc: "Wilson, Graham M.  (Perkins Coie)" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: FW: For approval: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails
Eric,

I am trusting that research has fully vetted these hits and we have solid backup, but am happy to put a second set of eyes on anything if it would be helpful -- especially when it comes to court decisions or other legal issues.

The 81 percent number in particular seems really specific. Want to double confirm we have a reputable source for that.

Thanks,
Jackie

From: Reif, Eric
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 2:38 PM
To: Crystal, Andy
Subject: Fwd: For approval: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails

Hey I just added you in my reply to her. Not sure if you want to just send her your entire doc on the trump shortlist or something.

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:
From: "Lopez, Jacquelyn K.  (Perkins Coie)" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: May 21, 2016 at 2:25:23 PM EDT
To: "Reif, Eric" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Cc: "Wilson, Graham M.  (Perkins Coie)" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: FW: For approval: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails
Eric,

I am trusting that research has fully vetted these hits and we have solid backup, but am happy to put a second set of eyes on anything if it would be helpful -- especially when it comes to court decisions or other legal issues.

The 81 percent number in particular seems really specific. Want to double confirm we have a reputable source for that.

Thanks,
Jackie

Jacquelyn Lopez | Perkins Coie LLP
ASSOCIATE*
700 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Suite 600
Washington, DC 20005-3960
D. +1.202.654.6371
F. +1.202.654.9949
E. [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
*Admitted in State of Florida; Admission to DC Bar pending.

From: Freundlich, Christina [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 2:15 PM
To: Reif, Eric; Lopez, Jacquelyn K. (Perkins Coie); Crystal, Andy
Cc: EMail-Vetting_D
Subject: RE: For approval: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails

Great

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 11:11 AM -0700, "Crystal, Andy" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
Looks great

From: Reif, Eric
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 8:48 AM
To: Jacquelyn Lopez; Crystal, Andy
Cc: EMail-Vetting_D
Subject: Re: For approval: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails

Here is the graphic for the second set of copy. Thanks!

From: "Lopez, Jacquelyn K. (Perkins Coie)" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Friday, May 20, 2016 at 9:56 PM
To: "Crystal, Andy" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Cc: Eric Reif <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, EMail-Vetting_D <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: Re: For approval: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails

Good

On May 20, 2016, at 2:40 PM, Crystal, Andy <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
good

From: Reif, Eric
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 2:38 PM
To: EMail-Vetting_D
Subject: For approval: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails

Hi all — Below is a text email and copy for a graphic we want to try referencing some of the people on Trump’s SCOTUS shortlist. Research and comms have already reviewed, but let me know if you have any flags.

—v1(EJB)—
Sender: Democrats.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__democrats.org&d=CwMF-g&c=XRWvQHnpdBDRh-yzrHjqLpXuHNC_9nanQc6pPG_SpT0&r=ohHmvs9zFsftJSG1ogAi2kAlp_MVVjeXcQm3530lljc&m=CSDafZoiv69q1hKqbeAmLym0SC49X8oegsdfldL-PN8&s=oaWmO1XeLbczcTPbBYCY5OhUPCvlHn85ORTrDY96wGk&e=>
Subject:

We know you understand just how important it is that we don’t let Donald Trump anywhere near the White House, NAME, but just in case you needed more evidence of just what is at stake this November, <LINK>we now have 11 more reasons.</LINK>

Earlier this week, the GOP’s presumptive nominee released his shortlist of some of the names “representative of the kind of constitutional principles” he values and, as president, might nominate to the Supreme Court.

That list includes names like Raymond Gruender, who authored an opinion that upheld a South Dakota law that would require doctors to tell women that abortions “terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique living human being.”

Or Bill Pryor, who Lambda Legal has called “the most demonstrably anti-gay judicial nominee in recent memory” thanks to his long history of opposing LGBT rights.

Diane Sykes was a major player in upholding Wisconsin’s voter ID law, one of the strictest in the nation, which could block as many as 300,000 registered voters from casting their ballots this fall.

Steven Colloton joined an opinion that restricted women’s access to birth control under the Affordable Care Act. Don Willett has ruled in favor of corporate interests at the expense of consumers and workers in 81 percent of of his decisions from the bench, including allowing companies to avoid accountability for workplace safety violations.

The list goes on, but it’s fair to say that Trump’s dream team of justices include some of the most extreme conservatives sitting on the bench across the country. Even one appointment from President Trump, not to mention the others that could arise during his term, would move this Court even further to the right and fundamentally alter it for a generation.

By refusing to do their jobs and allow President Obama’s unquestionably qualified nominee a hearing and a vote, Senate Republicans are effectively saying they prefer to gamble on a President Trump nominee.

We’re not going to let that happen, NAME. Add your name if you’re standing with Democrats to keep Trump’s recklessness away from any branch of our government:

LINK

Thanks for standing with us.

Democrats

—v2(SK)—
Sender: Democrats.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__democrats.org&d=CwMF-g&c=XRWvQHnpdBDRh-yzrHjqLpXuHNC_9nanQc6pPG_SpT0&r=ohHmvs9zFsftJSG1ogAi2kAlp_MVVjeXcQm3530lljc&m=CSDafZoiv69q1hKqbeAmLym0SC49X8oegsdfldL-PN8&s=oaWmO1XeLbczcTPbBYCY5OhUPCvlHn85ORTrDY96wGk&e=>
Subject:

Meet some of the judges
Who fit this guy’s
(Trump photo)
Idea of a good Supreme Court justice

Steven Colloton - upheld a law that said women who seek abortions should be considered to be at an "increased risk of suicide"
William Pryor - called Roe v. Wade “the worst abomination in the history of constitutional law"
Diane Sykes - authored an opinion that restricted a woman’s access to birth control
Don Willett - has ruled in favor of corporate interests 81 percent of the time

NAME(SERIOUSLY),
these nominees are just as extreme and unpredictable
as Donald Trump himself
So we can’t let him nominate anyone
To the Supreme Court

Add your name if you’re ready
to do whatever it takes to
[STOP DONALD TRUMP]

________________________________

NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.

________________________________

NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.