Subject: RE: 2016 GOP HIT on HRC
From: "Hendricks, Lauren" <[email-masked]>
To: Tony Carrk <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Brinster, Jeremy" <[email-masked]>, "Crystal, Andy" <[email-masked]>, "Dillon, Lauren" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 06:55:04 -0700

Michael C. Short Tweet
5/16/16 9:53 AM
Read Here<https://twitter.com/michaelcshort/status/732207273003626496>

Just FANTASTIC: nyti.ms/1EbawKD<https://t.co/VFZBolsxRx> twitter.com/stevenjay/stat…<https://t.co/7AgBmADS5x>
Steven Ginsberg @stevenjay<https://twitter.com/stevenjay>
“She’s horrible at running, but she’s fantastic at governing,” wpo.st/VHi_1<https://t.co/7w8g8FTRie>
Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html>

By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/michael_s_schmidt/index.html>MARCH 2, 2015
[https://static01.nyt.com/images/2015/03/03/us/03EMAILSjp/03EMAILSjp-master315-v3.jpg]
Hillary Rodham Clinton had no government email address.CreditLiam Richards/The Canadian Press, via Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/hillary_rodham_clinton/index.html?inline=nyt-per> exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business as secretary of state, State Department officials said, and may have violated federal requirements that officials’ correspondence be retained as part of the agency’s record.

Mrs. Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department. Her aides took no actions to have her personal emails preserved on department servers at the time, as required by the Federal Records Act.

It was only two months ago, in response to a new State Department effort to comply with federal record-keeping practices, that Mrs. Clinton’s advisers reviewed tens of thousands of pages of her personal emails and decided which ones to turn over to the State Department. All told, 55,000 pages of emails were given to the department. Mrs. Clinton stepped down from the secretary’s post in early 2013.

Her expansive use of the private account was alarming to current and former National Archives and Records Administration officials and government watchdogs, who called it a serious breach.

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle & Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, Nick Merrill, defended her use of the personal email account and said she has been complying with the “letter and spirit of the rules.”

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

Mrs. Clinton is not the first government official — or first secretary of state — to use a personal email account on which to conduct official business. But her exclusive use of her private email, for all of her work, appears unusual, Mr. Baron said. The use of private email accounts is supposed to be limited to emergencies, experts said, such as when an agency’s computer server is not working.

“I can recall no instance in my time at the National Archives when a high-ranking official at an executive branch agency solely used a personal email account for the transaction of government business,” said Mr. Baron, who worked at the agency from 2000 to 2013.

Regulations from the National Archives and Records Administration at the time required that any emails sent or received from personal accounts be preserved as part of the agency’s records.

But Mrs. Clinton and her aides failed to do so.

How many emails were in Mrs. Clinton’s account is not clear, and neither is the process her advisers used to determine which ones related to her work at the State Department before turning them over.

“It’s a shame it didn’t take place automatically when she was secretary of state as it should have,” said Thomas S. Blanton, the director of the National Security Archive, a group based at George Washington University that advocates government transparency. “Someone in the State Department deserves credit for taking the initiative to ask for the records back. Most of the time it takes the threat of litigation and embarrassment.”

Mr. Blanton said high-level officials should operate as President Obama does, emailing from a secure government account, with every record preserved for historical purposes.

“Personal emails are not secure,” he said. “Senior officials should not be using them.”

Penalties for not complying with federal record-keeping requirements are rare, because the National Archives has few enforcement abilities.

Mr. Merrill, the spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, declined to detail why she had chosen to conduct State Department business from her personal account. He said that because Mrs. Clinton had been sending emails to other State Department officials at their government accounts, she had “every expectation they would be retained.” He did not address emails that Mrs. Clinton may have sent to foreign leaders, people in the private sector or government officials outside the State Department.

The revelation about the private email account echoes longstanding criticisms directed at both the former secretary and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, for a lack of transparency and inclination toward secrecy.

And others who, like Mrs. Clinton, are eyeing a candidacy for the White House are stressing a very different approach. Jeb Bush, who is seeking the Republican nomination for president, released a trove of emails<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/25/us/politics/emails-from-tenure-as-governor-of-florida-show-jeb-bushs-agenda-and-goals.html> in December from his eight years as governor of Florida.

It is not clear whether Mrs. Clinton’s private email account included encryption or other security measures, given the sensitivity of her diplomatic activity.

Mrs. Clinton’s successor, Secretary of State John Kerry, has used a government email account since taking over the role, and his correspondence is being preserved contemporaneously as part of State Department records, according to his aides.

Before the current regulations went into effect, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, who served from 2001 to 2005, used personal email to communicate with American officials and ambassadors and foreign leaders.

Last October, the State Department, as part of the effort to improve its record keeping, asked all previous secretaries of state dating back to Madeleine K. Albright to provide it with any records, like emails, from their time in office for preservation.

“These steps include regularly archiving all of Secretary Kerry’s emails to ensure that we are capturing all federal records,” said a department spokeswoman, Jen Psaki.

The existence of Mrs. Clinton’s personal email account was discovered by a House committee investigating the attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi as it sought correspondence between Mrs. Clinton and her aides about the attack.

Two weeks ago, the State Department, after reviewing Mrs. Clinton’s emails, provided the committee with about 300 emails — amounting to roughly 900 pages — about the Benghazi attacks.

Mrs. Clinton and the committee declined to comment on the contents of the emails or whether they will be made public.

The State Department, Ms. Psaki said, “has been proactively and consistently engaged in responding to the committee’s many requests in a timely manner, providing more than 40,000 pages of documents, scheduling more than 20 transcribed interviews and participating in several briefings and each of the committee’s hearings.”

Lauren Hendricks

From: Hendricks, Lauren
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 9:32 AM
To: [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'
Cc: Brinster, Jeremy; Crystal, Andy; Dillon, Lauren
Subject: RE: 2016 GOP HIT on HRC

Michael C. Short Tweet
5/16/16 9:30 AM
Read Here<https://twitter.com/michaelcshort/status/732201462420377600>
"...poor showings with young women, untrustworthiness, unlikability and a lackluster style on the stump." wapo.st/1Thyw5A<https://t.co/Fdo4EVQZ3y>

Lauren Hendricks

From: Hendricks, Lauren
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 9:31 AM
To: [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'; [email-masked]'
Cc: Brinster, Jeremy; Crystal, Andy; Dillon, Lauren
Subject: 2016 GOP HIT on HRC

America Rising PAC Tweet
5/16/16 9:20 AM
Read Here<https://twitter.com/AmericaRising/status/732198765818351616>
ICYMI: Despite Winning Kentucky By 37 Points In '08, @HillaryClinton<https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/> Isn't Confident This Time Around #KYPrimary<https://twitter.com/search?q=%23KYPrimary> amp.twimg.com/v/f785e247-c5c…<https://t.co/ugddX2sIcg>

Michael B. Short Tweet
5/16/16 9:26 AM
Read Here<https://twitter.com/michaelcshort/status/732200462607392768>
Dem diagnosis on @HillaryClinton<https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/>: "poor showings w/ young women, untrustworthiness, unlikability & a lackluster style on the stump."

Michael C. Short Tweet
5/16/16 9:27 AM
Read Here<https://twitter.com/michaelcshort/status/732200850400088065>
WaPo: "More than a dozen Clinton allies identified weaknesses in her candidacy that may erode her prospects..." wapo.st/23TWeX2<https://t.co/awX6JeLTHk>
Even supporters agree: Clinton has weaknesses as a candidate. What can she do?<https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/even-supporters-agree-clinton-has-weaknesses-as-a-candidate-what-can-she-do/2016/05/15/132f4d7e-1874-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html>
[https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2016/05/11/Others/Images/2016-05-11/hrc11462991350.jpg?uuid=Q_No2BemEeaXGtrfmrGIaQ]
Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton meets New Jersey voters at Camden County College in Blackwood, N.J., last week. (Melina Mara/The Washington Post)
By Anne Gearan<http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/anne-gearan> and Dan Balz<http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/dan-balz> May 15 at 7:41 PM

Hillary Clinton’s declining personal image, ongoing battle to break free of the challenge from Sen. Bernie Sanders and struggle to adapt to an anti-establishment mood among voters this year have become caution signs for her campaign and the focus of new efforts to fortify her position as she prepares for a bruising general election.

More than a dozen Clinton allies identified weaknesses in her candidacy that may erode her prospects of defeating Donald Trump, including poor showings with young women, untrustworthiness, unlikability and a lackluster style on the stump. Supporters also worry that she is a conventional candidate in an unconventional election in which voters clearly favor renegades.

“I bring it down to one thing and one thing only, and that is likability,” said Peter Hart, a Democratic pollster who has conducted a series of focus groups for the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.

To counter these challenges, Clinton is relying primarily on the prospect that her likely Republican opponent’s weaknesses are even greater. But advisers also are working to soften her stiff public image by highlighting her compassion and to combat perceptions about trustworthiness and authenticity by playing up her problem-solving abilities.

“Hillary Clinton is in a stronger position than Donald Trump, but it will be competitive,” said Joel Benenson, Clinton’s senior strategist and pollster. “All these races are.”

None of these Democrats said they expected Clinton to lose — but many said she could. For the most part, it is her qualities as a candidate that keep her allies up at night, not her fitness to be president, which they categorically do not question. They also lament how exposed these flaws have become during a long primary contest against Sanders, who has profited from suspicion and dislike of Clinton among ranks she now must win over.

Although Clinton has never trailed Sanders in the delegate count and is all but assured of securing the nomination in June, she is widely expected to lose more Democratic primaries this month, which could amplify her weaknesses.

When Democrats assess Clinton, they tend to zero in on her communication skills: She is scripted and thin-skinned, they say. And with a sigh, they acknowledge the persistent feeling among a lot of Americans that they just don’t like her. Polls long have shown that many voters do not trust Clinton and that a majority view her unfavorably.

Hart said being seen as likable is “about the lowest bar” for a candidate, and yet Clinton has lower likability numbers today than she did when the campaign began.

It is cold comfort that Trump’s are worse, several Democrats said.

Among other potential problems identified by supporters: Clinton’s unpopularity with white men, questions about whether her family philanthropic foundation helped donors and friends, and lingering clouds from her tenure at the State Department, including her private email system, the Benghazi attacks in which four Americans were killed and her support for military intervention in Libya.

Clinton on the campaign trail
[https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_606w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2016/05/14/National-Enterprise/Images/DEM_2016_Clinton__Enthusiasm-a9a7a.jpg]
View Photos
The former secretary of state visits key states in her quest to become the Democratic nominee for president.

Aides say Clinton will continue to speak of her State Department years as evidence of her national security credentials. They point to 11 hours of congressional testimony about Libya and Benghazi, and a willingness to acknowledge mistakes, as proof that she is dealing with those issues forthrightly.

There are also concerns particular to an election against Trump. How, several Democrats asked, should Clinton deal with such an unpredictable antagonist? Supporters see potential problems for her in Trump’s omnipresence in American media, while she neither likes nor excels at media interviews.

They said there are upsides and downsides to Trump’s insults and taunts, including those having to do with her husband’s past infidelities.

If Trump continues to call Clinton an “enabler” of her husband’s behavior, her supporters see an opportunity to outclass her opponent.

“I couldn’t believe it!” Clinton supporter Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said last week of Trump’s attacks. “You blame the woman for male infidelity? I mean, to me, it was kind of bizarre. You would visit the sins of one on the other? I don’t think there’s any woman in America who doesn’t understand that is wrong.”

Bill Clinton himself is a double-edged sword, longtime supporters said. Hillary Clinton has no better advocate, and one who is now working at a furious pace to rally Democrats in the last primary contests. But with his own prodigious political talents, the former president also shows up his wife’s shortcomings on the stump, even if inadvertently, and is perhaps even more prone than she to going off script when someone gets under his skin.

Another challenge, two people who know her well said, will be to show how Hillary Clinton can tackle issues people care about without letting her wallow in weedy policy details. Clinton is a self-identified wonk, a believer in the power of government and what she sometimes calls evidence-based approaches to solve problems. This does not often make for good political theater.

“She’s horrible at running, but she’s fantastic at governing,” a longtime friend and supporter said. “She will roll up her sleeves. That’s not just a campaign talking point.”

The campaign is making an effort to highlight Clinton’s compassion. For example, an ad shows her consoling a 10-year-old who is worried about her family being deported. “You let me do the worrying,” Clinton says, hugging the girl.

Similarly, the campaign has sought to address qualms over Clinton’s trustworthiness and what voters have termed her “authenticity” by portraying her as the candidate with the best interests of individual Americans and the country at heart.

A vice-presidential pick who is a rousing speaker and possesses strong populist Democratic credentials is one potential antidote to Clinton’s to-do-list style on the stump, Democrats said. Some of the names mentioned, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey, Sen. Timothy M. Kaine of Virginia and Labor Secretary Thomas E. Perez, fit those bills. A campaign aide said Clinton is open to an unconventional candidate and does not rule out an all-woman ticket.

President Obama, whose “Yes, we can” mantra perfectly captured the 2008 political moment, is another potential solution to Clinton’s message problem and lack of mass appeal. Obama is expected to begin campaigning for Clinton in earnest as early as June, when she is expected to lock up the nomination.

Others said there is only so much Clinton can do to address her skills on the stump or to alter perceptions that have formed over nearly three decades in the public eye. Sexism and unfair expectations play a role, several of her partisans said, as the country adjusts to having a woman at the top of a national ticket — and so does the fact that nearly every American already has an opinion about the woman in question.

“They’re dealing with 20 years, almost 30 years now, of public narratives about her,” said Dan Pfeiffer, former White House senior adviser in the Obama administration. “I don’t think that’s fixable in the next six months. You have to turn it from a referendum on her trustworthiness to a contrast.”

Clinton has said that it pains her to hear that people don’t like her but that all she can do is make her case that she would be a good president. Some of her allies said she should focus on things she can control rather than on the subjective measure of likability.

“What I want to happen are things that will never happen,” said one longtime Clinton family supporter and donor who requested anonymity to express criticism of something he said Clinton probably could not change even if she wanted to. “I mean, we can’t give her an injection to make her an energetic candidate.”

Some strategists, including Benenson, argue that as the primaries end and Democrats begin to unify behind their nominee, her ratings will begin to improve.

Several other veterans of past campaigns said that, although Clinton will suffer from an authenticity gap against Trump, in the end voters will choose a more guarded personality to occupy the Oval Office.

“When the true Hillary Clinton and the real Donald Trump are revealed to Americans, there is no way the American people are going to pick the petulant 12-year-old,” said Bill Burton, a former senior Obama strategist.

Attacking Trump will be a big part of Clinton’s fall strategy. Numerous allies noted that Clinton is at her political best when fighting and at her most sympathetic when seen as vulnerable or a victim. One campaign strategy to address perceptions that she is remote or robotic is to “let ’er rip,” as one supporter said. Another will be to draw contrasts with what her allies describe as Trump’s nastiness and narcissism.

At a rally Tuesday in Louisville, Clinton accused Trump of running the most divisive campaign she has ever seen and said she looks forward to debating him.

“People say, ‘Well, maybe he doesn’t really mean it,’ ” she said. “If you are running for and serving as president, you better mean what you say.”

Also last week, Clinton, with obvious relish, compared herself with Trump on the subject of who had been more transparent in the release of tax records. She and her husband have placed 33 years’ worth in the public domain, she crowed.

“We’re going to find out” why Trump hasn’t released any returns, she said.

Benenson said the tax returns are emblematic of the downside of Trump’s outsider candidacy. Voters can extrapolate many things from Trump’s refusal or reluctance to release the records, including that he thinks regular political rules don’t apply to him, Benenson said.

“His unconventional candidacy is a challenge” for Clinton, “but it creates problems for him, too,” Benenson said. “The American people know they are electing the commander in chief. He’s an unconventional candidate, but he’s also a risky, dangerous candidate when it comes to people’s economic lives and safety and security abroad.”

Lauren Hendricks