Subject: RE: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails
From: "Freundlich, Christina" <[email-masked]>
To: "Reif, Eric" <[email-masked]>, "Crystal, Andy" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 11:28:31 -0700

Good

From: Reif, Eric
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 2:10 PM
To: Crystal, Andy; Freundlich, Christina
Subject: Re: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails

Got it, makes sense. Thanks!

Christina, unless you have any other thoughts I am going to forward these on to the rest of vetting. And like I said, I'll flag for Amy too to make sure there are no political issues.

From: "Crystal, Andy" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Friday, May 20, 2016 at 2:07 PM
To: Eric Reif <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, "Freundlich, Christina" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: RE: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails

Made one ed below. I don't think we can include the states for the judges in the last one - only Willet is on the Texas Supreme Court but the others are on federal circuit courts that don't just represent one state.

From: Reif, Eric
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 11:51 AM
To: Freundlich, Christina; Crystal, Andy
Subject: Trump SCOTUS nominee emails

Hey guys -

Andy, I mentioned this to Christina yesterday, but I would love to find a way to use the research you all put together on the judges on Trump's SCOTUS shortlist even though that release wasn't able to go out.

Wanted to get you two to take a look at we've started putting together before it went to the wider vetting chain just to make sure there's nothing here that seems totally off the wall. Given the political concern, I'm also planning to flag these for Amy (so she can flag for the WH if she wants) before they go out.

-v1(EJB)-
Sender: Democrats.org
Subject:

We know you understand just how important it is that we don't let Donald Trump anywhere near the White House, NAME, but just in case you needed more evidence of just what is at stake this November, <LINK>we now have 11 more reasons.</LINK>

Earlier this week, the GOP's presumptive nominee released his shortlist of some of the names "representative of the kind of constitutional principles" he values and, as president, might nominate to the Supreme Court.

That list includes names like Raymond Gruender, who authored an opinion that upheld a South Dakota law that would require doctors to tell women that abortions "terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique living human being."

Or Bill Pryor, who Lambda Legal has called "the most demonstrably anti-gay judicial nominee in recent memory" thanks to his long history of opposing LGBT rights.

Diane Sykes was a major player in upholding Wisconsin's voter ID law, one of the strictest in the nation, which could block as many as 300,000 registered voters from casting their ballots this fall.

Steven Colloton joined an opinion that restricted women's access to birth control under the Affordable Care Act. Don Willett has ruled in favor of corporate interests at the expense of consumers and workers in 81 percent of of his decisions from the bench, including allowing companies to avoid accountability for workplace safety violations.

The list goes on, but it's fair to say that Trump's dream team of justices include some of the most extreme conservatives sitting on the bench across the country. Even one appointment from President Trump, not to mention the others that could arise during his term, would move this Court even further to the right and fundamentally alter it for a generation.

By refusing to do their jobs and allow President Obama's unquestionably qualified nominee a hearing and a vote, Senate Republicans are effectively saying they prefer to gamble on a President Trump nominee.

We're not going to let that happen, NAME. Add your name if you're standing with Democrats to keep Trump's recklessness away from any branch of our government:

LINK

Thanks for standing with us.

The Democrats

-v2(SK)-
Sender: Democrats.org
Subject:

Meet some of the judges
Who fit this guy's
(Trump photo)
Idea of a good Supreme Court justice

Steven Colloton (Iowa) - believes upheld a law that saidwomen who seek abortions should be considered to be at an "increased risk of suicide"
William Pryor  (Alabama) - called Roe v. Wade "the worst abomination in the history of constitutional law"
Diane Sykes (Wisconsin) - authored an opinion that restricted a woman's access to birth control
Don Willett (Texas) - has ruled in favor of corporate interests 81 percent of the time

NAME(SERIOUSLY),
these nominees are just as extreme and unpredictable
as Donald Trump himself
So we can't let him nominate anyone
To the Supreme Court

Add your name if you're ready
to do whatever it takes to
[STOP DONALD TRUMP]