Subject: RE: Question on Donald Trump's "Enabler" Attack on Sec. Clinton
From: "Miranda, Luis" <[email-masked]>
To: DNC Press <[email-masked]>, "Paustenbach, Mark" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:14:53 -0700

Is there a Fuck You emoji?

Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone

-------- Original message --------
From: DNC Press <[email-masked]>
Date: 05/13/2016 14:08 (GMT-05:00)
To: "Paustenbach, Mark" <[email-masked]>, "Miranda, Luis" <[email-masked]>
Subject: FW: Question on Donald Trump's "Enabler" Attack on Sec. Clinton

FYI- This reporter has a 4pm deadline today.

From: Fred Lucas [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 1:54 PM
To: DNC Press
Subject: Question on Donald Trump's "Enabler" Attack on Sec. Clinton

Hello. I just spoke to someone with DNC Press and following up.

I am doing a freelance story for FoxNews.com  about Donald Trump's attacks against Secretary Clinton as an "enabler" of President Clinton's alleged misconduct with women.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/08/in-battle-for-women-s-vote-trump-cites-bill-clinton-infidelity-as-hillary-shrugs-off-personal-attacks.html

In at least some cases, past news reports and information from Judicial Watch indicate that Ms. Clinton might have been involved in the political strategy to discredit some of the accusers -- both in allegations of misconduct but also claims of a consensual relationship.

General questions:
1. I hoped the DNC could weigh in on the appropriateness of Trump attacking along these lines?

2. From your view, why shouldn't women voters take into account Secretary Clinton's past role in political strategy for responding to accusers of her husband?

I would really appreciate any response you have.

Thanks very much.

Fred Lucas
(703) 859-1836