Subject: Re: conference call tonight?
From: "Acdonilon" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Alexander Snyder-Mackler" <[email-masked]>, "ted kaufman" <[email-masked]>, "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:16:37 -0500

Agree that is the message. I think it makes sense for him to do it.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 20, 2010, at 11:08 AM, [email-masked] wrote:

> Charlie Oberly called re press request he hot from NBC Phila re  
> Coakley effect on my decision.  Did you all see his comments in NJ.   
> Told him they were ok but really the point I would like him to make  
> is that Coakley, Castle, opponents, other elections are not a  
> consideration for me -- it is a personal decision that Beau will  
> make.  "Not a factor for Beau one way or other.  One thing I know he  
> is focussed on is Bradley case."   Told him Bradley not Coakley.    
> all that said, should he even call them back and/or do on camera  
> interview.
>
> On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Acdonilon wrote:
>
>> Ok
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:05 AM, Alexander Snyder-Mackler <[email-masked] 
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Can everyone do a conference call tonight after Beau's kids are in  
>>> bed to go over tomorrow (especially statement/QnA) one last time?  
>>> I would guess around 830ish?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:58 AM,  <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>> Yes
>>> From: Alexander Snyder-Mackler <[email-masked]>
>>> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:52:23 -0500
>>> To: BB<[email-masked]>
>>> Subject: conf call
>>>
>>> do you want to do a conference call with Mike/Ted/Hunter after the  
>>> kids are in bed tonight?
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> Alexander Snyder-Mackler
>>> (302) 598-8678
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> Alexander Snyder-Mackler
>>> (302) 598-8678
>
>