Subject: Re: DRAFT to Antonio
From: "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 22:55:23 -0400

The only distinction I can see is the first letter said "suspend the project
INDEFINITELY" and they took out "indefinitely."  Meaning that ultimately
they would build at least two train sets in Wisconsin so they won't suspend
it indefinitely.  I have no other idea what the changes to the letter were
to add the recognition of the fact that the first two are part of the state
contract.  I don't get from Antonio's email though that he was saying we
didn't get it.  I think he was just clarifying it on his part too.

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:16 PM, <[email-masked]> wrote:

> What in our letter made it seem like we don't understand that first trains
> were sold under state contract?
>
> Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
> ------------------------------
> *From: * Eric Schwerin <[email-masked]>
> *Date: *Fri, 28 May 2010 18:50:55 -0400
> *To: *Hunter Biden<[email-masked]>
> *Subject: *DRAFT to Antonio
>
> Antonio-
>
> Thanks for the copy of the letter and that clarification on the first two
> train sets.
>
> We are happy to have our assistant hand deliver the original if you want to
> send it to us by FedEx, but as you know we don't lobby so neither Hunter nor
> anyone else at our firm could to talk to Jennifer about this issue.  I know
> you know that and assumed you mis-typed but I just wanted to clarify that.
>
> Hope you have a great weekend.
>
> Best,
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> Eric D. Schwerin
> Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
> 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
> Suite 705
> Washington, DC 20007
> (202) 333-1880
> [email-masked]
> *P** **Consider the environment before printing this email.*
>
>

-- 
Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Partners
(202) 333-1880
[email-masked]