Subject: Re: Transatlantic MOU
From: "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:44:12 -0400

Sounds good.  I clearly think the fact that we gave up the potential for a 75% performance bonus in equity and/or success fee should be worth something.  Also, we never failed in our job which was to bring a Talgo contract to the table.  Not trying to get us all whipped up again, but as I think it through more, not only are we not splitting the difference between 75% and 50%, we are going form 75% to 60% and they are going from 50% to 60%.   That is a fair compromise.  Or, they pay us $10K a month on Ormazabal.  Either one.

Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Suite 705
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-1880
[email-masked]
P Consider the environment before printing this email.

On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:11 PM, [email-masked] wrote:

I think 60/40 is the right compromise. I will call Abel today.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

From: Eric Schwerin <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:05:13 -0400
To: [email-masked] Archer<[email-masked]>; [email-masked] Biden<[email-masked]>
Subject: Transatlantic MOU

Abel called me about the MOU.   As I suspected, he didn't think we should split the CAF success fee 60/40, but instead 50/50.  I didn't commit either way - said I would discuss with the two of you.  I think the chances of a success fee aren't great so I don't know if it makes sense to push, but of course there is still the fact that we gave up a 75/25 equity split on Talgo for this and the 60/40 would be a nice compromise.

Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Suite 705
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-1880
[email-masked]
P Consider the environment before printing this email.