Subject: Pew: Independents now for GOP
From: "Alexander Snyder-Mackler" <[email-masked]>
To: "BB" <[email-masked]>, "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:49:15 -0400

<http://www.politico.com/>

*Pew: Independents now for GOP*
 By: Jeanne Cummings
September 23, 2010 03:03 PM EDT

In an ominous sign for President Barack
Obama<http://topics.politico.com/index.cfm/topic/BarackObama>and
congressional Democrats, independent voters now favor Republicans by
nearly the same margins that they went for Obama in 2008 and his party in
the 2006 mid-term, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center for the
People & the Press released Wednesday.

“For the third national election in a row, independent voters may be poised
to vote out the party in power,” Pew concludes.

If the breadth of the GOP’s gains this fall is determined by these
independent voters, the one possible problem for the party, the poll found,
could be if GOP candidates pay too much attention to a handful of social
issues that historically have driven away some swing voters.

That is among one of the few areas in which more independents, 39 percent,
say Democrats <http://topics.politico.com/index.cfm/topic/Democrats> reflect
their views compared to 33 percent who say Republicans do.

Republican strategists are mindful of the risk, which helps explain why
House GOP leaders downplayed such issues as abortion and gay marriage when
they unveiled “A Pledge to America,” a pamphlet the emphasized the economic
agenda Republicans would push if they regain the majority.

It’s a message they hope will have broad appeal with independent voters who,
the Pew survey found, are paying more attention to and are likely to
participate in higher numbers in this year’s midterms than those of the past
decade.

Unlike the most recent election cycles when
independents<http://topics.politico.com/index.cfm/topic/IndependentVoters>complained
about the lack of progress in Washington on major issues facing
the country, these critical swing voters now are expressing high anxiety
with what Congress and the White House have already done.

Overall, 45 percent of independents disapprove of the health care reforms
passed this year compared to 41 percent who approve of them. A third of
independents say Obama’s economic policies have made conditions worse for
them rather than better, compared to 24 percent who take a more positive
view.

“They feel that the issues have been dealt with but not in a way that is
satisfactory to them,” said Andrew Kohut, president of the Pew Research
Center <http://topics.politico.com/index.cfm/topic/PewResearchCenter>.

The upshot is that independents appear to be clamoring for a time-out in
Washington, as they absorb what already has passed and stall any other big
new reforms.

That sentiment is evident in the survey’s findings regarding their views
toward Washington and the course of the country. In 2006, 53 percent of
independents said they’d prefer a smaller government with fewer services;
today, 59 percent of them want a check on government growth. In 2006, 67
percent of independents were not satisfied with national conditions; today,
76 percent aren’t happy.

A similar waning of the pro-government posture among independents can be
found in the NBC/Wall Street Journal polls, according to an analysis by Bill
McInturff, the Republican analyst on the bipartisan team that conducts the
survey.

In a string of polls between 2002 and 2009, voters generally preferred to
see an expanded role for government in solving the nation’s problems. A year
ago, when Congress was enmeshed in the health care debate, that trend
shifted as more voters began registering concerns about the size and role of
government.

The change of heart was especially true among independents. Last September,
56 percent said government was trying to do too many things, and the gap has
only widened since then and now stands at double digits.

“Trust in government is at one of the lowest points in 60 years of polling,”
said Kohut. “It’s a backlash against what is seen as government policies and
programs that are too liberal or too much in the vein of government
expansion.”

About the only good news in the
survey<http://topics.politico.com/index.cfm/topic/Polls>for Democrats
is that a reasonable chunk – about 40 percent – of
independents said they still maintain some level of support for the
president or his party. Those respondents, however, are not nearly as
motivated to vote as their discontented independent brethren.

The emotions driving the sharp shift among independents are slightly
different than those behind the Republican-leaning tea party movement and
other conservatives.

In the poll, a third of Republicans said they are “angry” at the federal
government compared to about a quarter of independents.

Still, fully one half of the independents said they are frustrated with
Washington and they made clear they intend to do something about it

More so than Democrats interviewed in the poll, independents say they are
giving “a lot of thought” to the midterms and they are about as likely as
Democrats to say they will definitely vote.

Roughly half of them, 49 percent, said they will back a Republican while 43
percent said they’d support a Democrat.

Those figures are even more striking when only “likely voters” are taken
into consideration.

Among them, 49 percent said they will support a GOP candidate compared to
just 36 percent who are likely to vote Democratic – and that “is a pivotal
factor behind the Republican Party’s overall seven-point lead among all
likely voters at this point in the campaign,” the pew report notes.

On the issues, Republicans have overtaken Democratic advantages on managing
foreign policy, national security and the economy..

However, the Democrats maintained an edge on social issues. For instance,
more than twice as many independent voters than Republican voters favor
allowing same-sex marriages.

Social conservative groups have tried to elevate their issues, but Kohut
said Republican leaders would be wise to resist them.

“Those were issues that were very successful in keeping the base together in
the Bush years,” he said. “But you don’t need issues like that to keep the
base together. The base is unified in its negative response to Obama and the
economy.”

-- 

Alexander Snyder-Mackler
(302) 598-867