Subject: In Obama's reorganization plan, is Commerce first? - Yahoo! News
From: "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
To: "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Edward Prewitt" <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:34:47 -0500

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110129/ap_on_bi_ge/us_obama_bureaucracy

In Obama's reorganization plan, is Commerce first?

WASHINGTON – It was a big laugh line in President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech: "The Interior Department is in charge of salmon while they're in fresh water, but the Commerce Department handles them when they're in saltwater. I hear it gets even more complicated once they're smoked."

Behind the joke was an ambitious promise to tame and reorganize segments of the federal bureaucracy. If Obama's new chief of staff, Bill Daley, wields any influence, a primary target will be the Commerce Department.

Its 38,000 employees oversee a diverse portfolio, from helping businesses and conducting the census to providing accurate weather forecasts and granting patents and trademark protection.

Daley knows the department inside and out. He ran it during the Clinton administration.

Early last month, before Obama named Daley as his top aide, a Democratic-leaning think tank that has been a source of many Obama administration policy ideas laid out a plan to streamline the Commerce Department and sharpen its focus on making U.S. businesses more competitive — the new clarion call at the White House.

Seated with the leaders of the Center for American Progress that day was Daley, who once observed that because the department oversees the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the commerce chief "spent 60 percent of his time dealing with fish."

Indeed, Daley provided the salmon anecdote to the White House, just like he did earlier to center researchers who included it in their Dec. 1 report.

"There's no question there has to be some reorganization around these issues because it is ridiculous," Daley said upon the report's release. "Those of us who have been there — you often wonder why NOAA's there."

Thinning the bureaucracy is a perennial quest for politicians who cast themselves as reformers.

They don't often succeed.

House Republicans led by Speaker Newt Gingrich in 1995 had grand visions of eliminating the departments of Education and Energy. Vice President Al Gore got credit for a high visibility "reinventing government" program during the Clinton administration. It did trim government but did not win long-lasting institutional changes.

The last successful consolidation came after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, when Congress merged 22 agencies to create the Department of Homeland Security. But the reordering has not applied to Congress, where more than 100 committees or subcommittees oversee the department.

Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., recalled an effort he undertook to eliminate 17 programs that both the Bush and Obama administrations had identified as underperforming. "I took the lowest hanging fruit," he said. "When the rubber hit the road, it wasn't able to be implemented."

Warner, who has taken the lead in the Senate on issues of commercial competitiveness, said he was encouraged by Obama's approach, but is wary.

"Most federal employees have heard this before and they feel like administrations pay lip service to this," he said.

The president, in his State of the Union address, did not detail what agencies he would seek to merge, consolidate or reorganize. But the administration has often worked with the Center for American Progress on policy matters. It embraced a recent center proposal to create a panel to advise the president on how to better position U.S. businesses in the global marketplace.

Last week, Obama named General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt to head a new Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.

As part of a broader competitiveness effort, American Progress, headed by President Bill Clinton's former chief of staff John Podesta, advised the administration to consider replacing the Commerce Department with a Department of Business, Trade, and Technology.

That new department would have a $5 billion budget and 18,000 employees. It would include the Office of the United States Trade Representative, the Small Business Administration and other agencies that deal with global business but are not under the Commerce Department's umbrella.

"Right now you have a secretary whose portfolio in theory is the business of the United States, and yet so much of the relevant policy is distributed among so many different agencies and it just doesn't lend yourself to either having one person who has most of the major levers that can be coordinated," said Sarah Wartell, who served on the White House's National Economic Council during the Clinton administration.

Wartell, now a vice president at American Progress and an author of the report, said a new and more focused mission would attract leadership to such a department "that gives it the kind of stature and importance that this point in our history demands."

White House officials say it is too early to tell whether Obama will embrace those recommendations. He hasn't even identified a person to ride point on the effort.

But Obama, in the State of the Union address, said he would seek a change "that best serves the goal of a more competitive America." White House spokesman Robert Gibbs later referred to the "overlap of trade issues and export issues."

In Daley, Obama has a chief of staff with a stated appetite for change.

As Daley put it last month, in reference to attempts to reorganize how the bureaucracy works: "No question that unless you've been in the government, you really can't understand how screwed up it is when it comes to these sort of discussions."

Warner said Daley, as a former Cabinet member and as a top executive at JP Morgan Chase, brings a unique perspective.

"He's been in the belly of the beast."

___

Online:

Center for American Progress: http://tinyurl.com/49qecno

___

Online:

http://tinyurl.com/49qecno

Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Suite 705
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-1880
[email-masked]
P Consider the environment before printing this email.