Subject: FW: Reuters.com - Analysis: Too many start-ups chase too little cash
From: "Neil Callahan \(Rosemont Seneca\)" <[email-masked]>
To: "John DeLoche" <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>, "Rob Walker" <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>, "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Arlene Busch" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:32:42 -0400

Neil Callahan ( <mailto:[email-masked]> [email-masked]) has sent you this article.

Personal Message:

 <http://www.reuters.com> Reuters

Analysis: Too many start-ups chase too little cash <http://www.reuters.com/article/email/idUSTRE79T17220111030> 
Sun Oct 30 12:12:57 UTC 2011 

By Sarah McBride

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Venture capitalist Bill Gurley has noticed something new this autumn: a big jump in the number of what he calls "legitimate introductions" that he receives each day to entrepreneurs who hope he might invest in their start-up companies.

The money-seekers are companies that have benefited from a tidal wave of early-stage investing in start-ups and who now need funding from mainline VC firm's such as Gurley's Benchmark Capital to take them to the next level. But many companies, even some that have done fairly well in their initial phase, are finding it increasingly difficult to raise the next round of cash.

So far this year, some 859 companies have raised an initial round totaling $3.9 billion, according to data from the National Venture Capital Association and ThomsonReuters. That compares with 777 companies raising $3.5 billion this time last year and 523 companies raising $2.3 billion in the first nine months of 2009.

The plethora of early stage companies is a result of the comparatively low cost of bringing new technology products in the age of dirt-cheap software and data storage and massive social-marketing engines such as Facebook. A growing legion of wealthy "angel investors," many of whom made their money in the last boom, has contributed to the start-up boom too.

But it can still cost a lot of money to get a company from proof-of-concept to maturity and that's exactly where start-ups are running into trouble.

Every year sees some start-ups that don't make it to that next round. But this year, the situation is particularly bad, entrepreneurs and their potential backers say, simply because there are so many more young companies. And next year they expect it to get worse.

Of course, the hottest companies are having no trouble winning new rounds of funding. Cloud-based storage company Dropbox raised $250 million earlier this month in its third round of capital from companies including Benchmark.

Instead, the crunch is hitting the hundreds of fledgling companies that most people have never heard of.

"This is more about the long tail," meaning companies that aren't dominating, said Gurley, whose counts companies such as real-estate service Zillow Inc and restaurant-reservation service OpenTable Inc among his investment picks.

Exacerbating the problem: there is less cash to go around. Except for a handful of marquee names such as Benchmark, Accel Partners and Sequoia Capital, venture-capital firms are having trouble raising funds themselves. Last quarter, fund-raising reached an eight-year low, with VC firms raising just $1.72 billion, compared with $3.5 billion a year ago, according to the NVCA.

All of this means that many start-ups will have to look for alternatives to raising new funds.

One such route is what's known in the trade as a "face-saving acquisition." That means selling the business, sometimes for a song, before it has had a chance to grow, with the acquiring company often interested mainly in the start-up's staffers.

That talent, particularly engineers, usually ends up deployed in the acquiring company's core business, while the acquired start-up's business quietly closes. Facebook is famous for this type of move, as with its purchase last year of Internet-services company Chai Labs.

Another potential outcome for a cash-strapped start-up is to simply muddle along, never achieving the scale that might have been possible with more money.

And some, of course, will fail outright.

That's what happened to MyNines, a sample-sales aggregator site that raised around $350,000 in seed money last year, according to ThomsonReuters data. It would have taken another couple million to ramp up the business, founder and former CEO Apar Kothari told Reuters, which she didn't think she could raise when she ran out of cash earlier this year.

Now, Kothari is head of new business at online retailer Rue La La and MyNines is no more. She blamed its shuttering partly on missteps and partly on the fund-raising

climate.

"I still believe in the concept," she said.

For venture capitalists, having more companies to choose among means, in theory, that they can select the most promising and deserving start-ups and perhaps get better deals than previously.

That is, if they have time to sort through them. Gurley said he is receiving some 5-10 introductions a day, up from 1-5 a year ago.

"There's no way to process that," he told Reuters.

This service is not intended to encourage spam. The details provided by your colleague have been used for the sole purpose of facilitating this email communication and have not been retained by Thomson Reuters. Your personal details have not been added to any database or mailing list.

If you would like to receive news articles delivered to your email address, please subscribe at www.reuters.com/newsmails

© Copyright Thomson Reuters 2011 All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.

Quotes and other data are provided for your personal information only, and are not intended for trading purposes. Thomson Reuters and its data providers shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the quotes or other data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.