Subject: RE: Should we send this to Dan?
From: "Arlene Busch" <[email-masked]>
To: "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>, "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:47:44 -0500

I would think not, but it’s good ammo for a future conversation…. J

Arlene Busch

202-333-1880

[email-masked]

*From:* Eric Schwerin [mailto:[email-masked]]
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 22, 2012 2:45 PM
*To:* Arlene Busch; Hunter Biden
*Subject:* Should we send this to Dan?

Stock Market Does Much Better Under
Democrats<http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/02/22/stock_market_does_much_better_under_democrats.html>

"While Republicans promote themselves as the friendliest party for Wall
Street, stock investors do better when Democrats occupy the White House,"
Bloomberg<http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-22/stocks-return-more-with-dem-in-white-house-bgov-barometer.html>
 reports.

In fact, since John F. Kennedy was inaugurated, $1,000 invested in a
hypothetical fund that tracks the S&P 500 "only when Democrats are in the
White House would have been worth $10,920 at the close of trading
yesterday. That's more than nine times the dollar return an investor would
have realized from following a similar strategy during Republican
administrations."

"The Democratic edge is so large that the party comes out ahead even
without counting Bill Clinton (the Democrat with the biggest S&P 500 gain)
and George W. Bush (the Republican with the worst market record). A
hypothetical $1,000 investment under Democrats excluding Clinton was worth
$3,539 versus $3,296 invested under Republicans except Bush."

Eric D. Schwerin

Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC

1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW

Suite 705

Washington, DC 20007

(202) 333-1880

[email-masked] <x-msg://59/[email-masked]>

*P** **Consider the environment before printing this email.