Subject: Some perspective...
From: "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
To: "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>, "David Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:59:19 -0400

Irony at the Supreme Court
First Read: "Yesterday's oral arguments were simply the opening act in the Supreme Court's consideration of President Obama's signature health-care law. But today's discussion -- over whether or not the individual mandate to purchase health insurance is constitutional -- is the main event. And there's plenty of irony (and even hypocrisy) on this issue. After all, it was then-candidate Barack Obama who railed against the individual mandate, which was supported by Hillary Clinton. What's more, the individual mandate was once a conservative-leaning idea (championed by the Heritage Foundation, Newt Gingrich and, yes, Mitt Romney)."

"The final bit of irony: Only a small percentage of the public would even be subject to the individual mandate, if it's found to be constitutional. A new Urban Institute study finds, perHuffington Post, that 98% of Americans 'would either be exempt from the mandate -- because of employer coverage, public health insurance or low income -- or given subsidies to comply.' So there you have it, folks: The central issue before the Supreme Court was once opposed by Obama, supported by conservatives and Republicans, and won't even affect most Americans."

Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Suite 705
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-1880
[email-masked]
P Consider the environment before printing this email.