Subject: Re: Iowa
From: "Alexander S. Mackler" <[email-masked]>
To: "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 12:52:00 -0400

Much higher--he remains the preferred non-Hillary candidate by a lot.

On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Eric Schwerin <[email-masked]
> wrote:

> I think these are pretty good numbers for JRB if you assume a lot of
> people are saying they don't want JRB to run because they want HRC to have
> a clear path to the nomination.  I'd be more interested in the numbers on
> if HRC weren't running how many would want JRB to run.  Shouldn't we assume
> they would be higher?
>
>
> DES MOINES REGISTER lead story, "IOWA POLL: 50% in Iowa say Clinton should
> run for president: Ryan, Huckabee get solid support for '16 bid from GOP
> respondents," by Jennifer Jacobs: "If either Paul Ryan or Hillary Clinton
> truly is on the fence, ... some pop-the-champagne poll numbers ... might
> encourage them. But if Rick Santorum feels confident he could win Iowa
> again, the new poll could burst his bubble. The Iowa Poll examined
> reactions ... to six 're-runs' -- ... politicians who ran for the White House in
> 2008 or 2012 who are being talked about again for 2016. ... There's a
> 30-point difference between Iowa Democrats' attraction to another Clinton
> bid (88 percent) and another Biden bid (58 percent). ...
>
> "67 percent [of Republicans] say it's a good idea for [Ryan] to run ...
> 'Paul Ryan is the consistently most popular Republican official in the
> country, no matter where you look,' said Republican Brad Todd, a D.C.-based
> ad-maker. ... Huckabee, winner of the 2008 Iowa caucuses, [got an almost
> identical] 65 percent. Both get a lot more support for a retry than does
> Perry (50 percent) or Santorum (48 percent), the 2012 caucuses winner."
> http://goo.gl/Mqn4mF
>
> Eric D. Schwerin
> [email-masked]
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>

-- 

Alexander Snyder Mackler
(302) 598-867