Subject: Re: Julianna's Agreement
From: "John DeLoche" <[email-masked]>
To: "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Will Lee" <[email-masked]>, "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 08:47:32 -0700

Eric,

I have been through the agreement and think it is good to go. It gives us
more flexibility than the original. Let's hope she can bring some capital
to a closing and it pays for itself.

Let's get her to sign.

Thanks,

John

John DeLoche
*Co-founder and Managing Director*
Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners
333 Bush Street, 21st Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
office: 415 767 1288
mobile: 415 793 7070

This email communication is privileged and confidential and is intended
only for the individuals or entities named above. Any unauthorized
dissemination of any of the contents of this email is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or
disclose to others the contents of this communication. Please notify the
sender that you have received this e-mail in error and then delete the
e-mail.

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Eric Schwerin <
[email-masked]> wrote:

> Guys:
>
> Attached is the redlined version of Julianna's agreement as marked up by
> her lawyer.  The major change is making the agreement with the Smoot Tewes
> Group instead of Julianna herself but the agreement specifies Julianna is
> providing the services.   The only other major change I notice is the
> definition of what constitutes "cause" for termination is deleted.
>
> There are also some stylistic language changes regarding the repayment of
> any fees received should this agreement be terminated, but they don't look
> substantive to me.
>
> I don't think we should have any issues with the changes they made, but
> would be interested if everyone else agrees.  If so, I can send the clean
> version and this can be executed ASAP.
>
> Let me know.
>
> Best,
>
> Eric
>
>
>
>
>
>
>