Subject: Re: Privileged and Confidential
From: "Devon Archer" <[email-masked]>
To: "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Toohey, Ryan" <[email-masked]>, "Heather King" <[email-masked]>, "Vadim Pozharskyi" <[email-masked]>, "Alan Apter" <[email-masked]>, "Pacheco, Lawrence" <[email-masked]>, "McInerney, Jamie" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 15:02:26 -0400

Same thoughts here.  Not too bad.  Good work team in controlling this.

My thought is we should correct them. Hunter's an Independent Director and Nickoli is not his new boss.  

Devon Archer
646 436 3745

> On Jun 7, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Hunter Biden <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Well- as far as it goes I'd say not too bad. Why do they keep saying I was hired to run their legal department? Did they not get that I am a board member? Should we push back on that?
> 
> Anyway- what are other peoples reactions?
> 
> RHB
> 202.333.1880
> 
>> On Jun 7, 2014, at 8:26 PM, "Toohey, Ryan" <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> 
>> Link here: http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/7/ukrainian-energy-firm-hires-biden-son-as-lawyer/?page=1
>> 
>> On Jun 7, 2014, at 2:16 PM, "Toohey, Ryan" <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> 
>>> All,, 
>>> 
>>> Ap article is out. 
>>> 
>>> Will send around full text shortly. The reporter conflated 2 points related to political matters lobbying. We will reach out to him to correct. 
>>> 
>>> Heather and I discussed and we both think this ended up in a reasonable place. Interested to hear from others. 
>>> 
>>> Key point and link below. 
>>> 
>>> There’s no indication that Hunter Biden, his father or Burisma are crossing any legal or ethical lines, although ethics experts appear divided over the implications of Hunter Biden’s new job.
>>> 
>>> American conflict-of-interest laws and federal ethics rules essentially do not regulate the business activities of adult relatives of those who work in the White House.
>>> 
>>> On Jun 6, 2014, at 2:40 PM, "Heather King" <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Great thank you.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Heather King, Esq.
>>>> Partner
>>>> BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
>>>> 5301 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
>>>> Washington, D.C. 20015
>>>> 202-274-1129 (Phone)
>>>> 202-237-6131 (Fax)
>>>> [email-masked]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Vadim Pozharskyi [[email-masked]]
>>>> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 02:20 PM Eastern Standard Time
>>>> To: Alan Apter
>>>> Cc: Heather King; Devon Archer ([email-masked]); Hunter Biden ([email-masked]); Toohey, Ryan ([email-masked])
>>>> Subject: Re: Privileged and Confidential
>>>> 
>>>> fine by me!
>>>> vadim
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2014-06-06 20:41 GMT+03:00 Alan Apter <[email-masked]>:
>>>>> works for me, thanks
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Heather King <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>>>>> Alan and Vadim – Does it work for your schedules if Nardello plans to “meet” you via phone and speak with you next Thursday during our 10am conference call time?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Heather King, Esq.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Partner
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
>>>>>> 5301 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
>>>>>> Washington, D.C. 20015
>>>>>> 202-274-1129 (Phone)
>>>>>> 202-237-6131 (Fax)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [email-masked]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: Alan Apter [mailto:[email-masked]]
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 3:49 PM
>>>>>> To: Heather King
>>>>>> Cc: Vadim Pozharskyi ([email-masked]); Devon Archer ([email-masked]); Hunter Biden ([email-masked]); Toohey, Ryan ([email-masked])
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Privileged and Confidential
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> OK by me
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Heather King <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Vadim and Alan – We had previously discussed you speaking with Nardello tomorrow morning during our daily 10 am conference call.  We can proceed with that call if you wish, but I recommend that we postpone the call for a few days in light of the following: Nardello has not yet been officially engaged by my firm.  I am waiting for the engagement agreement to be approved internally at my firm, and then will need to provide it to Vadim for his final sign off. I am hoping to get this done by early next week.  In light of this, I have not had them start their work.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, please note that we had planned to meet with Hunter and Devon today in Washington but, due to unexpected last minute conflicts, that meeting has now been postponed until next Wed, June 11 at 145 pm.  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Heather King, Esq.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Partner
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
>>>>>> 5301 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
>>>>>> Washington, D.C. 20015
>>>>>> 202-274-1129 (Phone)
>>>>>> 202-237-6131 (Fax)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [email-masked]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> IRS Circular 230 disclosure:
>>>>>> To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, unless we expressly state otherwise, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]
>> 
>> 
>> Confidentiality Notice:
>> This email and any attachments may be confidential and protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender and then delete this copy and the reply from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.=2