Subject: Re: DRAFT EMAIL TO KELLY WILLIAMS
From: "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
To: "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 20:34:40 -0400

Yes on email and yes on attaching deck, correct?

Eric D. Schwerin
[email-masked]

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 9, 2014, at 8:31 PM, Hunter Biden <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Yes
> 
> RHB
> 202.333.1880
> 
>> On Sep 9, 2014, at 5:23 PM, Eric Schwerin <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> 
>> Let me know what you think………….also let me know if you think you should attach the RSTP deck.
>> 
>> --------------------------
>> 
>> Kelly-
>> 
>> Michael Sachs suggested I reach out to regarding an investment fund of ours, Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners (RSTP).   As you may be aware RSTP is a growth equity technology fund and our investment team met with Brandon Park on your team a few months back.  They have not heard back from Brandon regarding any follow up from that meeting and I wanted to check in with you and see if you needed any additional information from us or if it made sense to do another meeting.   As an update, since the first meeting with Brandon, Neuberger Berman has committed $15 million directly into our fund, and Goldman Sachs has now co-invested $48 million with us bringing the total raised from all investors so far to $74 million.   We also have some potential co-invest opportunities that might be appropriate for Grosvenor as well.
>> 
>> If there is no interest on Grosvenor’s part in moving forward that is perfectly fine as well.  I thought it would at least make sense to check in with you and make sure as I know sometimes wires get crossed.  I know there may be other opportunities down the line with RSTP or other products if this isn’t the right fit right now.  
>> 
>> Let me know your thoughts and I appreciate your assistance.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Hunter
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Eric D. Schwerin
>> Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
>> 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
>> Suite 705
>> Washington, DC 20007
>> (202) 333-1880
>> [email-masked]
>> P Consider the environment before printing this email.
>>=2