Subject: RE: FAO response to NY Times
From: "Randy Russell" <[email-masked]>
To: "Rick Leach" <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>, "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Samuel \"Sandy\" Berger" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 19:48:54 +0000

With all due respect to the FAO-this is a very weak response. If the strength of your argument is relying on individual country data-there truly is a problem. There is no explanation for the changing methodology. Overall, reading this, I am unconvinced. Randy

From: Rick Leach [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 3:38 PM
To: Glickman, Dan ([email-masked]); Randy Russell; Hunter Biden; Samuel "Sandy" Berger
Subject: FAO response to NY Times

FYI, the response from FAO to the piece in Sunday's NY Times on the global hunger numbers:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/02/opinion/world-hunger-numbers-and-solutions.html?_r=1

Richard Leach
President & CEO

World Food Program USA
1725 Eye Street NW, Suite 510
Washington, DC 20006
T 202.627.3737
F 202.530.1698
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>