Subject: Re: David Brock resigns from Hillary Clinton PAC - Kenneth P. Vogel - POLITICO
From: <[email-masked]>
To: "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:02:35 -0500

Too many egos fighting over a lot of money, won't be the last...

ASM

> On Feb 9, 2015, at 3:29 PM, Eric Schwerin <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> This is big - and nothing that we didn't see coming.  
> 
> http://www.politico.com/story/2015/02/david-brock-resigns-priorities-usa-action-115028.html
> 
> David Brock resigns from Hillary Clinton PAC
> 
>  				
> AP Photo
> 
> David Brock on Monday abruptly resigned from the board of the super PAC Priorities USA Action, revealing rifts that threaten the big-money juggernaut being built to support Hillary Clinton’s expected presidential campaign.
> 
> In a resignation letter obtained by POLITICO, Brock, a close Clinton ally, accused Priorities officials of planting “an orchestrated political hit job” against his own pro-Clinton groups, American Bridge and Media Matters.
> 
> Story Continued Below
> 
> Those groups – along with another pro-Clinton group, the super PAC Ready for Hillary – had their fundraising practices called into question last week by a New York Times report. It pointed out that veteran Democratic fundraiser Mary Pat Bonner got a 12.5 percent commission on funds she raised for Brock’s groups, and a smaller percentage commission on cash she raised for Ready for Hillary.
> 
> In his letter to the co-chairs of Priorities’ board – former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm and former Obama campaign manager Jim Messina – Brock alleged that “current and former Priorities officials were behind this specious and malicious attack on the integrity of these critical organizations.”
> 
> The letter – and Brock’s resignation – offer a rare glimpse into a network of groups upon which Democrats are relying to keep the White House and stave off increasingly robust big-money efforts on the right. The public airing of dirty laundry comes as sources say Priorities is struggling to live up to the hopes of some Clinton allies, who had argued it should aim to raise as much as $500 million to eviscerate prospective Clinton rivals in the primary and general elections.
> 
> Brock, who spent his early career in Washington as a self-described “right-wing hit man” before experiencing a political awakening and emerging as the leader of an empire of hard-hitting liberal attack groups, contends in his letter that Priorities is trying to damage his groups’ fundraising efforts, “while presumably enhancing Priorities’ own. Frankly, this is the kind of dirty trick I’ve witnessed in the right-wing and would not tolerate then. Our Democratic Presidential nominee deserves better than people who would risk the next election – and our country’s future – for their own personal agendas.”
> 
> Brock did not respond to requests for comment about the letter, his group’s relationship with Bonner or with the other big-money groups boosting Clinton.
> 
> Craig Smith, a senior advisor to Ready for Hillary, said his group is still working with Bonner, as well as with Priorities and Brock’s groups. “We have worked with them for almost two years. We continue to work with them. We all do very different things, so there’s not a lot of overlap.”
> 
> Asked if he thought rivals on the left were circulating negative information on Bonner, he said “I would hope not. Not that I’m aware of.”
> 
> Priorities spokesman Peter Kauffmann denied that Priorities had anything to do with the Times story, which also noted that his group paid fundraising commission on at least $2 million worth of checks, including from California tech billionaire Irwin Jacobs. Sources say Jacobs was upset by the revelations.
> 
> Kauffmann said Priorities is no longer paying fundraising commissions, and that it maintains close working relationships with the other groups boosting Clinton.
> 
> “Priorities USA Action and allied organizations demonstrated a clear ability to work together effectively in 2012 and we look to replicate that success again in 2016,” he said.
> 
> Still, Priorities and Ready for Hillary do to some extent compete with one another – and with Brock’s outfits – for big checks from wealthy Clinton backers. At one point, Priorities’ allies tried to force Ready for Hillary to shut down. But the groups – along with Brock’s – eventually entered into a sometimes uneasy alliance to lay the groundwork for the former Secretary of State to run for president in 2016. Together, the groups formed an unprecedented shadow campaign that combined to raise millions in 2014. American Bridge’s Correct the Record Project defends Clinton against political attacks, while Ready for Hillary builds files of voter and small donors, and Priorities cultivates relationships with major donors.
> 
> The idea was both to build an infrastructure that would allow Clinton to hit the ground running if and when she declared her candidacy for the Democratic nomination and also to project a financial show of force that would overwhelm any prospective rival in the primary or general elections.
> 
> The in-fighting is an ominous sign. It calls to mind the squabbles that helped sink Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign. It, too, was regarded as an unrivaled cash juggernaut, but feuding among cliques of supporters stymied efforts to launch a planned big-money outside effort in time to neutralize a surprisingly robust insurgent primary challenge from Barack Obama.
> 
> This time around, her allies tried to preempt the sectarianism by cross-pollinating the various groups to keep everyone on the same page and minimize competition. Granholm is on the boards of both Priorities and Ready for Hillary, while Brock joined the board of Priorities, and longtime Clintonite James Carville has been paid by American Bridge for assistance with fundraising and strategic advice.
> 
> But there also are more groups competing for big checks from rich Clinton backers than there were in 2008.
> 
> In his resignation letter, Brock asserted a “serious breach of trust between organizations that are supposed to work together toward common ends has created an untenable situation that leaves me no choice but to resign my position.”
> 
> Authors:
> 
> View Comments
> 
> 
> Eric D. Schwerin
> [email-masked]
> 
> Sent from my iPhon