Subject: Re: Law firm
From: <[email-masked]>
To: "Joshua Alcorn" <[email-masked]>, "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Alexander Snyder-Mackler" <[email-masked]>, "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 14:23:33 +0000 (UTC)

I would go with response 1. Let Stuart=deal with him.

Sent from Xfinity Connect Mobile App
------ Original Message ------

From: Josh Alcorn
Alex Snyder-Mackler, Hunter Biden, Eric Schwerin, Ted Kaufman
<=>Sent: May 1, 2015 at 1:37 PM
Subject: Fwd: Law firm
1. No response. Starkey’s article then says =omething about “no indication what this means for 2016, Biden campai=n didn’t respond to inquiries.”

2. I resp=nd, "Jon, the expanded role in the Whistle Blower group doesn’t=change anything.” And then ignore his follow up.

I like option two the best. I’m comfortable with option three, =ut don’t think I’m the best person to do it (Stuart would be, =r maybe Bart). Option one is by far the easiest, but I like where we&rsquo=re at now, and feeding the rumor mill by not responding may only put more =ressure on us. A fourth option may be an amalgam of two and three.

Thoughts?
=div class="">

Joshua Alcorn

302/295.8340=(office)

302/598.1885 (cell)

[email-masked]
=div class="">

Begin forwarded =essage:

From: "Starkey, Jonathan" <[email-masked]&g=;

To: Joshua A=corn <josh@beaubiden.=om>

Subject: Law firm

Date: <=pan style="font-family: -webkit-system-font, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, =ans-serif;" class="">May 1, 2015 at 8:02:17 AM EDT
=/div>

Hey Josh,
I'm writin= something quick about Beau expanding his role at G&E. Is he still pla=ning to run for gov?
Hope all's well,
Jon<=r class="">
Jonathan Starkey
The News Journa=
Cell: (302) 983-6756