Subject: A decade into a project to digitize U.S. immigration forms, just 1 is online - The Washington Post
From: "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
To: "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 22:57:03 -0500

A decade into a project to digitize U.S. immigration forms, just 1 is
online - The Washington Post

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/a-decade-into-a-project-to-digitize-us-immigration-forms-just-1-is-online/2015/11/08/f63360fc-830e-11e5-a7ca-6ab6ec20f839_story.html

A decade into a project to digitize U.S. immigration forms, just 1 is online

Heaving under mountains of paperwork, the government has spent more than
$1 billion trying to replace its antiquated approach to managing
immigration with a system of digitized records, online applications and a
full suite of nearly 100 electronic forms.

A decade in, all that officials have to show for the effort is a single
form that’s now available for online applications and a single type of fee
that immigrants pay electronically. The 94 other forms can be filed only
with paper.

This project, run by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, was
originally supposed to cost a half-billion dollars and be finished in 2013.
Instead, it’s now projected to reach up to $3.1 billion and be done nearly
four years from now, putting in jeopardy efforts to overhaul the nation’s
immigration policies, handle immigrants already seeking citizenship and
detect national security threats, according to documents and interviews
with former and current federal officials.

From the start, the initiative was mismanaged, the records and interviews
show. Agency officials did not complete the basic plans for the computer
system until nearly three years after the initial $500 million contract had
been awarded to IBM, and the approach to adopting the technology was
outdated before work on it began.

By 2012, officials at the Department of Homeland Security, which includes
USCIS, were aware that the project was riddled with hundreds of critical
software and other defects. But the agency nonetheless began to roll it
out, in part because of pressure from Obama administration officials who
considered it vital for their plans to overhaul the nation’s immigration
policies, according to the internal documents and interviews.

Only three of the agency’s scores of immigration forms have been digitized
— and two of these were taken offline after they debuted because nearly all
of the software and hardware from the original system had to be junked.

The sole form now available for electronic filing is an application for
renewing or replacing a lost “green card” — the document given to legal
permanent residents. By putting this application online, the agency aimed
to bypass the highly inefficient system in which millions of paper
applications are processed and shuttled among offices. But government
documents show that scores of immigrants who applied online waited up to a
year or never received their new cards, disrupting their plans to work,
attend school and travel.

“You’re going on 11 years into this project, they only have one form, and
we’re still a paper-based agency,’’ said Kenneth Palinkas, former president
of the union that represents employees at the immigration agency. “It’s a
huge albatross around our necks.’’

DHS officials acknowledge the setbacks but say the government is well on
the way to automating the immigration service, which processes about
8 million applications a year. The department has scrapped the earlier
technology and development method and is now adopting a new approach
relying in part on cloud computing.

“In 2012, we made some hard decisions to turn the Transformation Program
around using the latest industry best practices and approaches, instead of
simply scratching it and starting over,’’ said Shin Inouye, a spokesman for
Citizenship and Immigration Services. “We took a fresh start — a fix that
required an overhaul of the development process — from contracting to
development methodology to technology.’’

“Since making these changes, we have been able to develop and deploy a new
system that is able to process about 1.2 million benefit requests out of
USCIS’s total annual work volume,” Inouye added. “Our goals remain to
improve operations, increase efficiency, and prepare for any changes to our
immigration laws. Based on our recent progress, we are confident we are
moving in the right direction.”

Other DHS officials emphasized that if Congress passes immigration reform
in the near future, they would have an electronic system that could
accommodate any significant changes, including a surge in demand from
immigrants seeking legal status.

Until then, immigrants and their lawyers say they will remain hugely
frustrated by the government’s archaic, error-plagued system. Processing
immigration applications now often involves shipping paper documents across
the country, and delays are legend. A single missing or misplaced form can
set back an approval by months.

“It’s shameful that they’ve been on this for a decade and haven’t been able
to get a working system in place,’’ said Vic Goel, an immigration lawyer in
Reston, Va., who has followed the computerization project as a liaison for
the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
<https://adclick.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=L&ai=B9CCcaBlAVo2FMMWI3AHXr4DQCMr8o4cIAAAAEAEgADgAWOqZsuzGAmDJhqOH1KOAEIIBF2NhLXB1Yi0zNjcxMzQ2NTUxMjIxNTA5sgEWd3d3Lndhc2hpbmd0b25wb3N0LmNvbboBCWdmcF9pbWFnZcgBCdoBrAFodHRwczovL3d3dy53YXNoaW5ndG9ucG9zdC5jb20vcG9saXRpY3MvYS1kZWNhZGUtaW50by1hLXByb2plY3QtdG8tZGlnaXRpemUtdXMtaW1taWdyYXRpb24tZm9ybXMtanVzdC0xLWlzLW9ubGluZS8yMDE1LzExLzA4L2Y2MzM2MGZjLTgzMGUtMTFlNS1hN2NhLTZhYjZlYzIwZjgzOV9zdG9yeS5odG1smALYXsACAuACAOoCHC83MDEvbW9iLndwLnBvbGl0aWNzL2FydGljbGX4AvzRHpADpAOYA6QDqAMB4AQBkAYBoAYf2AYC2AcA&num=0&cid=5GjCxTrZYb5w9ivqaXEqjUow&sig=AOD64_2ChQfb4PrR2YD84Xgv9ed56XhvUw&client=ca-pub-3671346551221509&adurl=http://convention-package.explorestlouis.com/arch>

Online forms get pulled

When the electronic immigration system began in May 2012, it was hailed as
“a significant milestone in our agency’s history” by the USCIS Director
Alejandro Mayorkas, who is now the deputy secretary of homeland security.

The first form that went live was intended for foreigners who were in the
United States on certain types of visas who wanted to renew their
non-immigrant status.

But only a fraction of applicants ever used that form before the agency
took it offline, after officials decided to abandon the initial technology
and development method and move toward a cloud-based system. Some officials
inside DHS said the system should never have been launched at all because
of reports that it was suffering from so many technical errors.

The second form, released in 2013, didn’t fare much better. It was designed
to allow a certain group of foreigners — those wanting to immigrate to the
United States and invest in a business — to apply electronically. Only
about 80 people used the online form, DHS officials said. More than 10,000
others opted for old-fashioned paper. It was also pulled.

The third form, which debuted last year, is the one that would allow
permanent residents to renew or replace their green cards online. In nearly
200 cases, applicants did not receive their cards or had to wait up to a
year, despite multiple requests, according to a June report from the USCIS
ombudsman.

The agency also hoped to make it possible for immigrants to pay fees
online. There are more than 40 kinds of filing fees that immigrants pay to
the government with their applications. As of now, however, only one can be
paid online — by those who immigrate to the United States as lawful
permanent residents. And even this limited electronic payment system has
encountered major problems, such as resistance from immigrants who have
trouble because they may not have computers or bank accounts.

A series of government reports has skewered the online immigration system,
named ELIS after Ellis Island, even after the old technology was scrapped
and officials were scrambling to move to the new cloud-based approach.
These studies have found that it is slow, confusing and inefficient for
immigrants and government employees alike.
<https://adclick.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=L&ai=BGEMwaRlAVqzUDdaQ3AHRz7GoCMr8o4cIAAAAEAEgADgAWIqbgu3GAmDJhqOH1KOAEIIBF2NhLXB1Yi0zNjcxMzQ2NTUxMjIxNTA5sgEWd3d3Lndhc2hpbmd0b25wb3N0LmNvbboBCWdmcF9pbWFnZcgBCdoBrAFodHRwczovL3d3dy53YXNoaW5ndG9ucG9zdC5jb20vcG9saXRpY3MvYS1kZWNhZGUtaW50by1hLXByb2plY3QtdG8tZGlnaXRpemUtdXMtaW1taWdyYXRpb24tZm9ybXMtanVzdC0xLWlzLW9ubGluZS8yMDE1LzExLzA4L2Y2MzM2MGZjLTgzMGUtMTFlNS1hN2NhLTZhYjZlYzIwZjgzOV9zdG9yeS5odG1smALYXsACAuACAOoCHC83MDEvbW9iLndwLnBvbGl0aWNzL2FydGljbGX4AvzRHpADpAOYA6QDqAMB4AQBkAYBoAYf2AYC2AcA&num=0&cid=5GgJ647fKyyBIWr9GQxUV-hp&sig=AOD64_1CnTBZGvQezZgFjjrep9VlBCiuHA&client=ca-pub-3671346551221509&adurl=http://convention-package.explorestlouis.com/arch>

A report last year from the DHS inspector general’s office said it
sometimes took up to 150 clicks for employees to navigate the system’s
various complex features and open documents — and that the system lacked
functions as basic as a usable search engine. Internal DHS evaluations have
warned of “critical engineering uncertainties” and other difficulties.

“It’s incredibly slow to use the few forms they put online,’’ said Goel,
the immigration lawyer. “Most immigration lawyers have concluded the system
is half-baked.’’

‘It wasn’t going to work’

Government watchdogs have repeatedly blamed the mammoth problems on poor
management by DHS, and in particular by the immigration agency.

When the project began, DHS was only two years old, cobbled together after
the Sept. 11 attacks from myriad other government agencies, and the
department was still reeling. “There was virtually no oversight back
then,’’ a former federal official said. “DHS was like the Wild West on big
acquisitions.”

The Government Accountability Office has blasted the immigration service
for shoddy planning, saying the agency awarded the IBM contract “prior to
having a full understanding of requirements and resources needed to execute
the program.” As a result, basic planning documents were incomplete or
unreliable, including cost estimates and schedules. The basic requirements
for the project, the report said, were not completed until 2011 — nearly
three years after the IBM contract was awarded.

IBM had as many as 500 people at one time working on the project. But the
company and agency clashed. Agency officials, for their part, held IBM
responsible for much of the subsequent failure, documents show.

The company’s initial approach proved especially controversial. Known as
“Waterfall,” this approach involved developing the system in relatively
long, cascading phases, resulting in a years-long wait for a final product.
Current and former federal officials acknowledged in interviews that this
method of carrying out IT projects was considered outdated by 2008. “The
Waterfall method has not been successful for 40 years,” said a current
federal official involved in the project, who was not an authorized
spokesperson and spoke on the condition of anonymity.
<https://adclick.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=L&ai=BcVR7ahlAVvPUFZSF3QGlvZiYB8r8o4cIAAAAEAEgADgAWNKE4uzGAmDJhqOH1KOAEIIBF2NhLXB1Yi0zNjcxMzQ2NTUxMjIxNTA5sgEWd3d3Lndhc2hpbmd0b25wb3N0LmNvbboBCWdmcF9pbWFnZcgBCdoBrAFodHRwczovL3d3dy53YXNoaW5ndG9ucG9zdC5jb20vcG9saXRpY3MvYS1kZWNhZGUtaW50by1hLXByb2plY3QtdG8tZGlnaXRpemUtdXMtaW1taWdyYXRpb24tZm9ybXMtanVzdC0xLWlzLW9ubGluZS8yMDE1LzExLzA4L2Y2MzM2MGZjLTgzMGUtMTFlNS1hN2NhLTZhYjZlYzIwZjgzOV9zdG9yeS5odG1smALYXsACAuACAOoCHC83MDEvbW9iLndwLnBvbGl0aWNzL2FydGljbGX4AvzRHpADpAOYA6QDqAMB4AQBkAYBoAYf2AYC2AcA&num=0&cid=5GiaIVAJd8gLd4sI50BDX5x4&sig=AOD64_2s7_wMnpeRkguU3GTr05foXCWwIA&client=ca-pub-3671346551221509&adurl=http://convention-package.explorestlouis.com/arch>

An IBM spokesman declined to address the criticisms, saying only that the
company’s work on Transformation concluded in May.

By 2012, the system’s fundamental flaws — including frequent computer
crashes and bad software code — were apparent to officials involved with
the project and, according to one of them, and it was clear that “it wasn’t
going to work.”

But killing the project wasn’t really an option, according to officials
involved at the time. President Obama was running for reelection and was
intent on pushing an ambitious immigration reform program in his second
term. A workable electronic system would be vital.

“There was incredible pressure over immigration reform,” a second former
official said. “No one wanted to hear the system wasn’t going to work. It
was like, ‘We got some points on the board, we can go back and fix it.’ ”

Delays and lost papers

Immigration reform never made it out of Congress, but it could resurface
after the presidential election next year. If it does, and if it involves
possible citizenship or legal status for the 11.3 million immigrants who
are in the country illegally, the policy would flood the government with
millions of complicated new applications.

“Oh, God help us,’’ said Harry Hopkins, a former immigration services
official who worked on the Transformation project. “If there is immigration
reform, they are going to be overwhelmed.’’

The project’s failures already have daily consequences for millions of
immigrants who are in the country legally. Immigration lawyers say the
current system leads to lost applications, months-long delays and errors
that cause further delays. Immigrants miss deadlines for benefits, meaning
they lose everything from jobs and mortgages to travel opportunities.

Luke Bellocchi, an immigration lawyer and former deputy ombudsman at
Citizenship and Immigration Services, said he has handled at least 100
cases of lost applications in the past few years, mostly for green cards.

“No one knows where these applications are,” he said. “It’s an absolute
nightmare.’’

Another concern is national security. DHS officials said they are confident
that the current paper-based system is not putting the nation at risk. But
others, like Palma Yanni, a D.C. immigration lawyer and past president of
the American Immigration Lawyers Association, are dubious.

“If there are some bad apples in there who should not get a green card, who
are terrorists who want to do us harm, how on earth are they going to find
these people if they’re sending mountains of paper immigration files all
over the United States?’’ Yanni asked.

Alice Crites contributed to this report.

Eric D. Schwerin
[email-masked]

Sent from my iPhon