Subject: Clinton email scandal: Why it might be time for Democrats to draft Joe Biden - The Washington Post
From: "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
To: "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 07:13:54 -0500

Clinton email scandal: Why it might be time for Democrats to draft Joe
Biden - The Washington Post

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/clinton-email-scandal-why-it-might-be-time-for-democrats-to-draft-joe-biden/2016/02/05/cd69dfea-cc18-11e5-a7b2-5a2f824b02c9_story.html

Clinton email scandal: Why it might be time for Democrats to draft Joe Biden

The Hillary Clinton email issue is developing into a real whodunit,
complete with Clintonesque legal semantics. “I never sent or received any
material marked classified,” she said
<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/trackers/2016-01-20/clinton-never-sent-received-any-material-marked-classified-npr>
with respect to the discovery of classified information on her private,
unclassified email server. That surface denial nearly rivals Bill Clinton’s
classic <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQmXs>: “I did not have
sexual relations with that woman.”

But this is no laughing matter.
Colbert I. “Colby” King writes a column -- sometimes about D.C., sometimes
about politics -- on that runs on Saturdays. In 2003, he won the Pulitzer
Prize for Commentary. King joined the Post’s editorial board in 1990 and
served as deputy editorial page editor from 2000 to 2007. *View Archive*
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/colbert-i-king>

There is nothing trivial about a secretary of state having top-secret
information on an unsecured computer in her home. That appears to have been
the case, based on the State Department’s announcement
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/e19abf78b6fe43e7b7719f059901630d/apnewsbreak-govt-finds-top-secret-info-clinton-emails>
last week that 22 emails, across seven email chains, containing top-secret
information were on Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

At issue is whether the information in the emails was classified when it
was sent to her unsecured server. It was, after all, the State Department,
upon review of the content by intelligence agencies, that upgraded the
emails to top-secret and ordered them withheld from the public.

Now, it may well be that some of Clinton’s political opponents are out to
derail her presidential campaign and are using the email controversy to do
so. Or it could be the case, as Clinton’s supporters claim, that
intergovernmental infighting over what is and isn’t classified is driving
this investigation.

The important nonpolitical question: Did the nation’s top diplomat or her
State Department staff improperly handle extremely sensitive, top-secret
information and do so in a manner in which the information could be
compromised?

State Department rules are quite clear.

Top-secret information must not be placed on any unclassified systems. It
must be accounted for and controlled. And no copy of a top-secret document
can be made without the permission of the office or agency in which it
originated.

In addition, any State Department employee who causes the compromise of
top-secret information or makes a copy of a top-secret document or any
portion of it without the originator’s permission is subject to
administrative action.

There are also limited ways in which top-secret information can be
transmitted. Sending top-secret information via a private, unsecured email
server is not one of them. Transmitting top-secret information with the
classification removed is also forbidden.

That makes it critical to establish whether Clinton’s private server
contained information that was classified at the time it was sent or
received.

Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said
<http://www.npr.org/2015/08/19/432908987/government-inquiry-into-clinton-emails-likely-to-widen>
, “She was at worst a passive recipient of unwitting information that
subsequently became deemed as classified.” In other words, Clinton is an
innocent victim of bureaucratic infighting. If so, how did it happen?

That’s what makes this a Washington whodunit.

Someone inside the State Department transmitted the information to
Clinton’s personal email account through a private server. That employee —
or employees, as the case may be — knows or should know whether the
material was drawn from, was based on or included top-secret information.

Given that the information on the server has been upgraded to top-secret,
another fear arises: Have unauthorized individuals, even foreign
governments, gained access to highly classified information, to the
detriment of the United States?

It’s not as though clandestine attempts to penetrate government agencies
have not been made.

In fall 2014, the State Department shut down
<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-cybersecurity-statedept-idUSKCN0J11BR20141117>
and shored up its unclassified email system after detecting a possible
hacker attack. A hacker also attacked
<http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/10/white-house-hacked/382063/>
the White House’s unclassified computer system around the same time.

Last year, Iranian hackers broke into the email and social media accounts
of State Department officials who focused on Iran and the Middle East,
according to the New York Times
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/25/world/middleeast/iran-hackers-cyberespionage-state-department-social-media.html>
.

In July, The Post reported
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2015/07/09/hack-of-security-clearance-system-affected-21-5-million-people-federal-authorities-say/>
that hackers who attacked the Office of Personnel Management got the
personnel and security files of at least 22 million people, including
federal employees and contractors, as well as their families and friends.

The U.S. Postal Service was hacked
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2014/11/10/china-suspected-of-breaching-u-s-postal-service-computer-networks/>
in 2014. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s computer
system was compromised
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/chinese-hack-us-weather-systems-satellite-network/2014/11/12/bef1206a-68e9-11e4-b053-65cea7903f2e_story.html>
the same year.

The nongovernment personal accounts of CIA Director John Brennan and
Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson reportedly have been hacked
<http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/19/politics/cia-fbi-alleged-hacking-report/>.

It’s chilling to think of what a breach of Clinton’s email account might
mean to national security.

Presidential election year or not, the Clinton email issue must be
resolved. Just a thought: As a precaution, the manager in the White House
dugout might consider telling the bullpen to start warming up Joe Biden.

*Read more from Colbert King’s archive
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/colbert-i-king>.*

Eric D. Schwerin
[email-masked]

Sent from my iPhon