Subject: What the NYTimes just wrote
From: "Seth Moulton" <[email-masked]>
To: "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:10:24 +0000

Hunter,

​Every year the House Armed Services Committee sets policy for our nation's defense.​ Today, The New York Times Editorial Board endorsed one of the amendments I offered.

​Thousands ​of local translators put their lives on the line​ to work with our troops, help keep them safe, and make our military operations successful​. But, when the job ends, they face tremendous dangers to themselves and their families, simply for having worked with the U.S.

From Afghanistan alone, there are 10,300 such allies seeking safety by applying for visas to live in the United States. Currently the bill limits that program so that 4,000 of them would not be able to apply for that visa. All of our valued translators should have that opportunity, not just a few.

Below is what The New York Times had to say.

Sincerely,

Seth Moulton

PS. If you believe in protecting American values, please share this on Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/SethMoultonForCongress/posts/664911033647836>.

Don’t Abandon America’s Afghan Helpers

By THE EDITORIAL BOARD <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/29/opinion/dont-abandon-americas-afghan-helpers.html?utm_source=seth-moulton>

APRIL 29, 2016

The House Armed Services Committee approved a version of the 2017 defense spending bill on Thursday that would leave thousands of Afghan interpreters who worked for the American government in Afghanistan in the lurch.

More than 10,000 applicants, many of whom submitted petitions years ago and are now under threat in their country, are waiting for visas to get to the United States. However, the State Department can approve only about 4,000 applications, given the number of visas currently authorized by Congress.

The committee’s bill provides no additional visas and imposes unreasonable eligibility criteria for applications made after next month. Under the bill, only interpreters who worked with military personnel in the field would be eligible for resettlement. That is senseless, since many interpreters who worked on military bases or in government offices are in similar danger.

Every weekday, get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, The Times editorial board and contributing writers from around the world.

The visa program, which has long enjoyed bipartisan support, has become a target of lawmakers who want to limit immigration to the United States, including Representative Bob Goodlatte, Republican of Virginia, chairman of the Judiciary Committee.

When the Senate and the House versions of the defense bill are reconciled next month, lawmakers should increase the visa numbers to clear the backlog of pending cases. They should not change the eligibility standard and they should require the State Department to establish a reasonable appeals process for applicants who have been rejected without a clear explanation.

“These are people who have put their lives on the line not just for their country, but for ours,” Representative Seth Moulton, a former Marine Corps officer, said Wednesday as he introduced an amendment to create additional visas. “The very least we can offer them is a chance to stay alive.” Mr. Moulton and other lawmakers who have served in the military intend to propose sensible changes as the bill moves forward. Their colleagues should listen to them.

-=-=-
Seth Moulton For Congress - Salem, MA 01970, United States 
This email was sent to [email-masked].  To stop receiving emails: http://www.sethmoulton.com/unsubscribe
-=-=-

Created with NationBuilder - http://nationbuilder.com/