Subject: Fourth Straw Poll Results TODAY, September 9th - UN Secretary General Election
From: "Jared Genser" <[email-masked]>
To: "Jared Genser" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:40:26 +0000

Dear Friends,

See the results below.  In remarks at a press stakeout after the vote, UK Ambassador Matthew Rycroft said that the "absolute minimum is nine encourages," implying strongly anyone below that threshold should drop out.  To be elected Secretary-General, a candidate must have nine yes votes and no vetoes from P5 members.

The next straw poll is September 26th and the first week of October will be the color-coded vote where the ballots of the P5 will be red, showing which candidates may have incurred a prospective veto.

Best,

Jared

-

Results of Fourth Straw Poll, September 9, 2016

Guterres 12-2-1

Lajcak 10-4-1

Jeremić 9-4-2

------

Kerim 8-7-0

Malcorra 7-7-1

Bokova 7-5-3

Turk 7-6-2

Clark 6-7-2

Figueres 5-10-0

Gherman 3-11-1

Jared Genser

Managing Director

1700 K Street, NW, Suite 825

Washington, D.C. 20006

+1.202.466.3069 (o)

+1.202.320.4135 (m)

I'm now tweeting<https://twitter.com/intent/follow?original_referer=https://twitter.com/about/resources/buttons&region=follow_link&screen_name=JaredGenser&tw_p=follo>!

The UN Security Council in the Age of Human Rights

Cambridge University Press, 2014

Co-Edited by Jared Genser and Bruno Stagno Ugarte

<http://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/law/public-international-law/united-nations-security-council-in-age-human-rights?format=HB?format=HB>

For decades the UN Security Council skirted human rights, addressing them sporadically, reluctantly, and typically without reference to binding standards. That began to change with the end of the Cold War, as easing political tensions allowed the Council gradually to act on the fact that upholding the norms against atrocities is intimately connected to its classic mandate of defending international peace and security. Yet even since then, that evolution has been contested, particularly when the Council's permanent five members fear the topic might come back to haunt them or their close allies. This exceptional volume of essays provides a comprehensive assessment of the Council's conflicting views on human rights with more nuance, sophistication, and historical memory than anything else around. It helps us to understand how the shifting battles over human rights are being waged in the Council and provides guidance as to how the Council can more effectively defend our rights in the future.

Kenneth Roth, Executive Director, Human Rights Watch

During the last 20 years, the UN Security Council has embraced the protection of individual rights as a matter of international peace and security. That said, progress has been uneven and there have been both great strides forward and terrible setbacks. This timely and important book provides the first comprehensive assessment about how the Security Council works to address major human-rights challenges around the world and recommends ways it can do so more effectively.

Luis Moreno Ocampo, First Prosecutor, International Criminal Court (2003-2012)

The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of the message