Subject: Re: AT&T Subpoenas
From: "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
To: "Eric Schwerin" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Sarah E. Mancinelli" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:23:58 -0500

I don't care but wha is the possible reason for needing my phone records in no fault jurisdiction? And hey are e not doing the same?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 29, 2017, at 5:52 PM, Eric Schwerin <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> FYI, we received notices at the office from AT&T that they had been subpoenaed to provide phone records for 202-552-9396 (Hunter’s cell issued by work) and 202-333-5198 (Hunter’s direct office land line - which isn’t an account with AT&T).   AT&T said they will respond on 2/5/17 unless they hear from Hunter that there is any reason they shouldn’t.  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Eric D. Schwerin
> Rosemont Seneca Advisors, LLC
> 1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
> Suite 705
> Washington, DC 20007
> (202) 333-1880
> [email-masked]
> P Consider the environment before printing this email.
>=2