Subject: Fwd: Issues
From: "SMancinelli" <[email-masked]>
To: "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 16:16:41 +0000

See below. Meg said she didn't sign.

Begin forwarded message:

From: Meg McKinney <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: March 10, 2017 at 6:02:43 PM EST
To: SMancinelli <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: Re: Issues

Call me if you want to discuss. Tomorrow I'm tied up til about 1 but shld be available after that. It was too late to have her sign it.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 10, 2017, at 5:29 PM, SMancinelli <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:

How is he supposed to pay it? Really?

On Mar 10, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Meg McKinney <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:

There is some room to move and the fees aren't very much. Maybe 10k or so. She feels like she doesn't have a way to pay it and is really just looking for a clean start, which isn't an unfair request. We are finishing up.

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Rebekah J.H. Sullivan" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: March 10, 2017 at 4:45:04 PM EST
To: "SMancinelli ([email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>)" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, "Meg McKinney ([email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>)" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: Issues

Here are what I see as the outstanding disputes:

-Debt to Kathleen’s parents:  It is undisputed that the parties made regular payments on this debt, so we are not sure why Hunter is now denying it.  Kathleen is willing to take on the prospective debt, and only asks that Hunter pay the payments from April 2015 through present, which total $9,600.  We have added that in the list of debts, so Hunter does not have to concede any facts, he just would agree to pay that amount.

-Art:  We do not want to do a distribution of the art.  Kathleen picked it out and purchased it.  If there are one or two pieces of art he wants, we can talk about them, but we are not going to agree to a lottery or equal distribution of the art.

-Life insurance:  Hunter needs to maintain it throughout his alimony obligation to Kathleen.  If the policy premiums increase, he will need to find another policy.  This security is vital to Kathleen who will be relying on the income from Hunter.

-Tax exemptions:  Kathleen should get these according to IRS rules.  I know they are transferrable, but we do not see any reason to do so in this case.

-Attorney’s fees/CPA fees:  Our understanding all along was that Hunter would be paying our fees and Debbie’s fees.  Both of us have floated Kathleen relying on that.  It is not fair now to shift that to Kathleen, when the understanding from day 1 was that Hunter would be paying.  And, it is only fair as they have been a one pot family up until now.

Rebekah J.H. Sullivan
Kuder, Smollar, Friedman & Mihalik, PC
1350 Connecticut Ave. NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036

www.KSFMLAW.com<http://www.ksfmlaw.com/>
Tel: 202/331-7522
Fax: 202/331-0388

******NOTICE*********
This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s)
above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product
or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received this
message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify
the sender at (202) 331-7522 and delete this e-mail message from your computer.
Thank You.

[cid:3904E418-B115-4E59-991B-DF50212E5BFB