Subject: Editors' Picks: China's imperial foreign policy; and why the U.S. left Palestinians out in the cold
From: "Foreign Policy" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:18:54 -0500 (CDT)

If you have problems viewing this email, view it in a browser.

EDITORS' PICKS

03/12/2018

Welcome to Editors’ Picks, FP’s round-up of the day’s best articles.

Today, we look at why China’s Belt and Road initiative is bringing back bad memories of imperialism, how the United States has cut off aid to Palestinian refugees, and why the Cold War is a bad analogy for understanding foreign policy.

1

In the lurch: Nikki Haley bet the rest of the world would cover the costs of American aid cuts to Palestinian refugees. That hasn’t happened, FP’s Colum Lynch reports.

Read more

2

That's no cold war: Everyone's favorite historical analogy makes for disastrous foreign policy today, FP’s Stephen M. Walt writes.

Read more

3

Imperial nightmares: From Russia to Central Asia, Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative triggers bad memories of Chinese imperialism, Robert Daly and Matthew Rojansky write.

Read more

4

Trump and Kim walk into a bar: Diplomacy only works if both participants in a high-stakes meeting knows what they're doing, Elephants in the Room’s Michael J. Green writes.

Read more

5

Potemkin Polls: Vladimir Putin is putting a tremendous amount of effort into producing a fake vote, Shadow Government’s Daniel Baer writes.

Read more

This email was sent to [email-masked] by [email-masked].

UPDATE PROFILE

UNSUBSCRIBE

PRIVACY POLICY

ADVERTISE

GROUP SALES AND LICENSING

Foreign Policy Magazine is published by the FP Group, a division of Graham Holdings Company. All contents ©2018 The Slate Group, LLC. All rights reserved. Foreign Policy, 11 DUPONT CIRCLE NW, SUITE 600, WASHINGTON DC 20036

color
000000
conversation-id
24525
date-last-viewed
0
date-received
1520893116
flags
8590195841
remote-id
291417