Subject: FW: Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Friday, May 4, 2018
From: "Kathy Chung" <[email-masked]>
To: "Ashley Blazer Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Jill Tracy Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Jimmy Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Valerie Biden Owens" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 08:50:32 -0400

Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing

*From:* Bulletin Intelligence <[email-masked]>
*Sent:* Friday, May 4, 2018 7:50 AM
*To:* [email-masked]
*Subject:* Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Friday,
May 4, 2018

*Click to access
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=000-255&t=c>
mobile-optimized online version, including download options and an audio
reader.*

[image: Image removed by sender. Office of Vice President Biden
Intelligence Briefing]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=001-8d5&t=c>

*To: Vice President Joe Biden*

*Friday, May 4, 2018 8:00 AM EDT*
Today's Table of Contents

*Leading the News <#SECTION_1>*

• Media Reports Critical Of Trump Tweets, Giuliani Comments On Daniels
Payment. <#S1>

• Giuliani Says Mueller Probe “Dead,” Calls On Sessions To Bring It To An
End. <#S2>

*Foreign Policy <#SECTION_2>*

• Trump, Giuliani Hint At Imminent Release Of US Prisoners From North Korea.
<#S3>

• US, China Conclude First Day Of Trade Talks. <#S4>

• US Warns Of Consequences For China’s South China Sea Militarization. <#S5>

• Iranian Officials: Nuclear Deal Will Not Be Renegotiated. <#S6>

• NYTimes: US Special Forces Secretly Help Saudis Combat Houthi Rebels.
<#S7>

• Vice: Military Base Buildup Suggests US “Shadow War” In Somalia Is
Expanding. <#S8>

• UK Lawmakers Push For Trump To Address Parliament During July Visit. <#S9>

*Domestic Policy <#SECTION_3>*

• Repealing Obama-Era Restrictions, Trump Announces Faith-Based Initiative.
<#S10>

• Dozens Of Caravan Migrants Begin Pleading Cases. <#S11>

• Pruitt Did Not Disclose He Bought Oklahoma House With Lobbyist In 2003.
<#S12>

• WSJournal A1: Large Public Companies’ Earnings Growth Coming From Tax
Cuts. <#S13>

• Arizona Teachers End Walkout After Getting 20% Pay Raise. <#S14>

• Ryan Reverses Ouster Of House Chaplain Amid Claims Of Anti-Catholic Bias.
<#S15>

• Investigation Finds More Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Charlie
Rose. <#S16>

*Cancer Research <#SECTION_4>*

• Tennessee Governor Vetoes Alternative Cancer Treatment Bill. <#S17>

• Univ. Of Oklahoma Collecting Patients’ Tumor DNA For Nationwide Database.
<#S18>

*Editorials/Op-Eds <#SECTION_5>*

• New York Times. <#S19>

• Washington Post. <#S20>

*Biden in the News <#SECTION_6>*

• Michigan 2020 Poll: Biden Leads Trump 52%-39%. <#S21>
Leading the News
Media Reports Critical Of Trump Tweets, Giuliani Comments On Daniels
Payment.

In the aftermath of Rudy Giuliani’s interview on [image: Image removed by
sender. Video]Fox News’ Hannity
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=002-7ae&t=c>,
President Trump took to Twitter yesterday morning, and wrote
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=003-657&t=c>
that attorney Michael Cohen “received a monthly retainer, not from the
campaign and having nothing to do with the campaign, from which he entered
into, through reimbursement, a private contract between two parties, known
as a non-disclosure agreement, or NDA. These agreements are...
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=004-bf7&t=c>
very common among celebrities and people of wealth. In this case it is in
full force and effect and will be used in Arbitration for damages against
Ms. Clifford (Daniels). The agreement was used to stop the false and
extortionist accusations made by her about an affair...
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=005-15d&t=c>
despite already having signed a detailed letter admitting that there was no
affair. Prior to its violation by Ms. Clifford and her attorney, this was a
private agreement. Money from the campaign, or campaign contributions,
played no roll in this transaction.”

        Media coverage was extremely unfavorable toward both Trump and
Giuliani, casting their statements as opening the door to additional legal
woes for Trump. The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=006-05a&t=c>
(5/3, Morton) reports “a major Fox News Channel figure laid into...Trump on
Thursday – and it wasn’t Shepard Smith or Juan Williams.” Neil Cavuto “said
Mr. Trump’s history of inaccurate statements...is his own personal
‘swamp.’” Said
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=007-d5f&t=c>
Cavuto, “Let me be clear, Mr. President. How can you drain the swamp if
you’re the one that keeps muddying the waters? You didn’t know about the
$130,000 payment to a porn star until you did.”

        Many reports, including the lead stories on all three major network
newscasts, also highlight the apparent contradiction between Trump’s tweets
and earlier statements he made in response to reporters’ questions – in
which he denied knowing anything at all about the payments. For example,
Dan Balz asks in a front-page Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=008-cf9&t=c>
(5/3, A1) story, “Does it bother anyone that...Trump has been caught lying?
Does it bother anyone that this is not new? Does it bother anyone that the
president has been shown to be a liar? These questions are again front and
center before the country.” While “people will answer them differently,
depending on their views about Trump...the questions won’t go away. They
are part of the fabric of this presidency.” Balz adds that “thanks
to...Giuliani...Trump has been exposed flat out.”

        In a similar analysis titled “New Revelations Suggest A President
Losing Control Of His Narrative,” Peter Baker writes in the New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=009-c45&t=c>
(5/3) that “even in the current political environment that some derisively
call the post-truth world, the past few days have offered a head-spinning
series of revelations.” Baker adds that “whether called lies or
misstatements, Mr. Trump’s history of falsehoods has been extensively
documented, but the string of factual distortions that came to light this
week could come back to haunt him.” While “as a matter of politics, the
latest contradictions may not matter much, at least not yet...under the
unforgiving glare of federal prosecutors...misrepresentations carry far
greater jeopardy.”

        NBC Nightly News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=00a-f90&t=c>
(5/3, lead story, 2:55, Welker) referred to a “presidential flip-flop,” [image:
Image removed by sender. Video]ABC World News Tonight
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=00b-36a&t=c>
(5/3, lead story, 4:15, Karl) reported that “last month, the President
flatly denied knowing anything about the hush money,” and the [image: Image
removed by sender. Video]CBS Evening News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=00c-cef&t=c>
(5/3, lead story, 2:00, Glor) showed Stormy Daniels’ attorney Michael
Avenatti saying, “It’s an outrage, frankly, that the President of the
United States would stand on Air Force One on videotape and blatantly lie
to the American people. The President and his advisers are making this up
as they go along. They realize they are in a heap-load of trouble.”
Avenatti told CNN’s The Lead
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=00d-791&t=c>
(5/3), “These are not half truths or possibly being mislead – these are
outright lies to the American people.”

        Another New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=00e-c98&t=c>
(5/3, Sullivan, Apuzzo, Haberman) story also says that Trump’s tweets “had
far more formal and legalistic language than his typical morning messages
to the world,” but they “directly contradicted his earlier
statements.” The Wall
Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=00f-88c&t=c>
(5/3, Ballhaus, Palazzolo) reports on the tweets along similar lines,
while Bloomberg
News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=010-fde&t=c>
(5/2, Olorunnipa) says Trump “changed his account,” and USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=011-7c2&t=c>
(5/3, Jackson) that he is “changing his story” and “contradicting previous
statements.” The Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=012-07c&t=c>
(5/3, Fabian) casts him as “contradicting past claims,” while the Washington
Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=013-3a1&t=c>
(5/3, Wagner) notes that “Trump did not say whether he knew about the
payments to Cohen when they were made,” and the Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=014-10c&t=c>
(5/3, Persons) highlights that he insisted “none of the money used to
pay...Daniels came from campaign cash.”

        To the Los Angeles Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=015-11b&t=c>
(5/3, Bierman), Trump “tried to contain the legal and political fallout
from...Giuliani’s revelations,” but his “postings are unlikely to answer
multiple questions.” The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=016-ada&t=c>
(5/3, Lee) reports that according to Richard Hasen, “election law expert”
at the University of California at Irvine, “if the payment were ‘wholly
personal, as in made to help Trump’s marriage but not his campaign,’ it
would not amount to a campaign finance violation,” but “experts say” that
“the fact that it was made so close to the election raises questions.”
Along those lines, Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=017-f02&t=c>
(5/3) reports “the claim of repayment is significant because a payment by
Cohen could be seen as an illegal campaign contribution.” Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=018-909&t=c>
(5/3, Olorunnipa, Allison) also reports “Trump and his lawyers face a new
set of legal challenges,” the AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=019-35a&t=c>
(5/3, Sherman) that “Giuliani may have added to the legal headaches of his
new law client and old friend,” and USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=01a-058&t=c>
(5/3, Schouten) that “if Trump knew about Cohen’s payment to Daniels but
didn’t disclose it as a loan on his campaign’s filings with the Federal
Election Commission, that could amount to a ‘knowing and willful’ violation
of election law and a criminal statute that prohibits making false
statements to the government.” The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=01b-203&t=c>
(5/3, Bykowicz, Palazzolo) runs a similar story under the headline “Trump’s
Payment To Stormy Daniels Raises Campaign-Finance Questions.”

        ABC World News Tonight
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=01c-364&t=c>
(5/3, lead story, 4:15, Karl) reported that Giuliani is “saying this had
nothing to do with protecting Trump, nothing to do with the campaign, but
then” he “also said, ‘Imagine if this came out in the middle of the last
debate with Hillary Clinton.’ How do you reconcile the two?” Jonathan Karl
replied, “It’s not easy. What they’re saying is that this was about
protecting the President, or then the candidate, from personal
embarrassment, not political damage. That’s an important distinction,
because if this was for political reasons, the payment could have violated
campaign finance law.” NBC Nightly
News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=01d-058&t=c>
(5/3, lead story, 2:55, Welker) showed Adav Noti of the Campaign Legal
Center saying, “There was a knowing and willful attempt to evade campaign
finance disclosure and that could make the scheme criminal activity.”

        Giuliani appeared on Fox
News’ Fox & Friends
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=01e-592&t=c>
(5/3, 7:32 a.m. EDT, Doocy) yesterday morning and spoke to the Wall Street
Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=01f-ba1&t=c>
(5/3, Ballhaus, Palazzolo) and BuzzFeed
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=020-7a9&t=c>,
recounting that Cohen “‘complained to some people’ after the 2016 election
that he’d not been fully paid by Trump,” and “at some point – Giuliani said
he did not know when or where specifically – Cohen met with Trump and told
him of his complaint.” Giuliani says Trump “told Cohen, ‘We’ll cover your
expenses,’ and agreed to pay him $35,000 a month ‘out of his personal
funds’ over the course of a year-long period that began in the first few
months of 2017 and has since ended. ‘It clearly was a payment to reimburse
expenses,’ Giuliani said – adding the caveat, ‘I’m almost certain that
there wasn’t an itemized bill.’” Giuliani also spoke to USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=021-7e0&t=c>
(5/3, Jackson), saying of the current investigations, “It’s going to take
some time, but I think we’re going to be OK.” Of Cohen’s payment, he said,
“No one ever thought of it as a campaign contribution. ... It was a
personnel settlement.”

        The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=022-8f2&t=c>
(5/3, Lucey, Colvin) says that while “Giuliani’s revelation appeared to
take many in the West Wing by surprise,” it was actually “no accident.” The
AP notes that former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said yesterday, “You
know, there’s an old saying in the law, ‘Hang a lantern on your problems.’
... So the fact is that Rudy has to go out there now and clean it up.
That’s what lawyers get hired to do.” Along those lines, the New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=023-6ac&t=c>
(5/3, Shear) notes that “asked about his remarks after finishing the Fox
News interview” Wednesday night, Giuliani “said that what might have seemed
to some viewers – including, perhaps, Mr. Hannity – like a slip of the
tongue, was actually a planned disclosure.” The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=024-39f&t=c>
(5/3, Rucker, Dawsey, Costa, Parker) reports that in an interview, Giuliani
said “he discussed the issue with Trump a few days ago and that they agreed
that he would reveal details about the reimbursement.” Said Giuliani, “He
was well aware that at some point when I saw the opportunity, I was going
to get this over with.” Tony Carbonetti, “a longtime friend and adviser to
Giuliani, said he was dining with the former New York mayor on Manhattan’s
Upper East Side on Wednesday night before he went on Fox,” and “warned that
those lampooning Giuliani are mistaken.” Said Carbonetti, “If you’ve been
around Rudy, there’s always a reason for it. ... If you knew a narrative
was coming out, wouldn’t you want to tell the story on your terms? ... He
wanted to get ahead of it.”

        The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=025-8f7&t=c>
(5/3, A1, Ballhaus, Nicholas) runs a front-page analysis titled “Trump
Gambit Stuns Staff,” in which it reports that Giuliani also dined with
Corey Lewandowski ahead of his Hannity interview. The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=026-052&t=c>
(5/3, Rucker, Dawsey, Costa, Parker), meanwhile, reports Giuliani “may have
had a strategy” ahead of last night’s Hannity appearance, but he “hatched
it almost entirely in secret.” The Post adds “the White House counsel had
no idea. Neither did the White House chief of staff, nor the White House
press secretary, nor the new White House lawyer overseeing its handling of
the Russia investigation.” They “watched, agog, as Giuliani...freestyled on
live television,” and “aides and advisers to the president...expressed a
mixture of exasperation and horror.” The Post adds “one White House
official” texted “a reporter a string of emoji characters in response,
including a tiny container of popcorn.” A “second White House
official...said of the president, ‘His story is obviously not consistent
anymore.’”

        The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=027-790&t=c>
(5/3, Lucey, Colvin) also reports the revelations “appeared to take many in
the West Wing by surprise,” and “in briefings and media appearances, White
House aides have sought to avoid staking out a clear position on the
matter, directing reporters to Trump’s own comments.” The New York Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=028-b3c&t=c>
(5/3, Fredericks) says White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders “was
grilled about the contradictions coming from the West Wing, with reporters
asking her repeatedly about numerous statements from her and from the
commander-in-chief that later turn out to be false.” Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=029-e08&t=c>
(5/3, Schwartz) quotes Sanders as saying, “We give the very best
information that we have at the time.” Adds Politico, “That was...Sanders’
response when ABC reporter Jonathan Karl asked her during Thursday’s press
briefing how the American people could trust a president and White House
that ‘show what appears to be a blatant disregard for the truth.’” It was
“a line she repeated again and again in her 17 minutes of taking questions
from reporters.”

        The Los Angeles Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=02a-805&t=c>
(5/3, Decker) reports Sanders said “Trump did not know about a $130,000
payoff to an adult film actress who claimed she’d had a sexual affair with
him even as he paid tens of thousands of dollars to the New York attorney
who made the payments,” and The Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=02b-820&t=c>
(5/3, Fabian) that she “sought to explain why...Trump claimed he didn’t
know about a hush money payment to...Daniels,” telling reporters, “This was
information the president didn’t know at the time, but eventually learned.”

        *Media Analyses: Giuliani Media Blitz Backfiring. *A number of
media analyses paint a highly unfavorable picture of Giuliani’s performance
as Trump’s attorney. Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=02c-5a1&t=c>
(5/3, Nelson, Gerstein) reports Giuliani is “causing new migraines for the
White House,” and under the headline “Giuliani: The President’s Attack Dog
Who May Have Bitten Trump,” the New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=02d-47c&t=c>
(5/3, Shear, Steinhauer) calls Giuliani “loose-lipped, intemperate,
confrontational and supremely confident that he knows better than anyone
else.” The Times adds that “on Wednesday night,” he “seemed reduced to
America’s grouchy dinner guest,” and “found himself undermining his new
client.” The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=02e-1a4&t=c>
(5/3, Zapotosky, Barrett, Leonnig, Lee) reports “Giuliani’s media
blitz...might have backfired, giving investigators new leads to chase and
new evidence of potential crimes, legal analysts said.” The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=02f-018&t=c>
(5/3, Boyer) runs a similar story, titled “Rudy Giuliani’s Media Blitz
Provides Ammunition For Trump Foes.”

        Judge Andrew Napolitano, appearing on [image: Image removed by
sender. Video]Fox News’ Fox & Friends
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=030-d45&t=c>
(5/3), said, “If Rudy wants the public to believe that Donald Trump
reimbursed Michael Cohen $130,000 and didn’t know what it was for, didn’t
know that it was going to silence Stormy Daniels, that is unworthy of
belief. It is hard to believe that of Donald Trump, a man who knows where
every one of his nickels has gone. ... It’s up to the American public
whether to believe that somebody like Donald Trump would just pour money
down a hole to Michael Cohen... without asking to whom the money was going
and for what purpose – how would Michael Cohen know if Stormy Daniels
needed to be silenced.”

        Appearing on CNN’s New Day
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=031-b0e&t=c>
(5/3), legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin said, “How stupid do they think we are?
They have been lying about this from day one. I am not clear there was any
criminal violation here. ... I don’t know if there was a criminal element
to it even if it was campaign related – that is a very esoteric crime that
is rarely prosecuted. But...everyone involved in this, starting with the
President, has been lying about this from day one. It is just so
extraordinary – and the absence of any kind of sheepishness about that,
that to me is the real story. ... Until you see the canceled checks or
however the money passed, I certainly wouldn’t believe anything these
people say.”

        *NBC Issues Correction After Reporting Investigators “Wiretapped”
Cohen Call To White House. *Citing “two people with knowledge of the legal
proceedings involving Cohen,” NBC News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=032-95d&t=c>
(5/3) reported on its website yesterday that “federal
investigators...wiretapped” Cohen’s “phone lines.” NBC added that “it is
not clear how long the wiretap has been authorized,” but “was in place in
the weeks leading up to the raids on” Cohen and “at least one phone call
between a phone line associated with Cohen and the White House was
intercepted.” NBC goes on to report that “after the raid, members of
Trump’s legal team advised the president not to speak to Cohen,” and “two
sources close to” Giuliani “say he learned that days after the raid the
president had made a call to Cohen, and told Trump never to call again out
of concern the call was being recorded by prosecutors.”

        Sean Hannity said in his opening monologue on [image: Image removed
by sender. Video]Fox News’ Hannity
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=033-0bf&t=c>
(5/3), “Once again we learned that a major component of this report was,
once again, ‘fake news.’ NBC was forced to issue a quote
‘correction.’” The Washington
Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=034-61d&t=c>
(5/3, Kasperowicz) reports that NBC “issued a correction saying that his
phones weren’t tapped after all.” According to CNN
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=035-df0&t=c>
(5/3), “The correction was announced on MSNBC during ‘Meet the Press Daily’
by the story’s lead reporter, Tom Winter,” who “said US officials had told
him that it ‘was not a wiretap’ but instead a ‘pen register.’” Winter is
quoted as saying, “In plain English, that means it was a log of phone calls
that were made from specific phone line – from a specific phone line or
specific phone lines.” CNN says Winter “explained that a pen register meant
authorities were ‘not able to listen in in real-time or record his
conversations.’ Instead, they were only able to monitor incoming and
outgoing calls.”

        The CBS Evening News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=036-306&t=c>
(5/3, story 2, 0:45, Glor) also reported “two federal officials tell CBS
News there are no wiretaps, there are no transcripts, there are no phone
recordings of any of...Cohen’s telephone conversations, including any he
may have had with the President.” ABC
World News Tonight
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=037-13a&t=c>
(5/3, story 2, 2:10, Phillips), meanwhile, said “it’s unclear how long
before the raids investigators started tracking Cohen’s phone calls, but
sources tell ABC News, Cohen and the President spoke just days after the
raids, meaning, that phone call could be on investigators’ radar.” [image:
Image removed by sender. Video]NBC Nightly News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=038-df9&t=c>
(5/3, lead story, 2:55, Welker) mentioned the matter briefly at the end of
its report on the Cohen story last night, saying that “adding to the
concerns NBC News learned federal investigators were keeping a log
of...Cohen’s phone calls and identified at least one call placed from a
Cohen phone line to a White House line.”

        Under the headline “Giuliani Was Right: Cohen’s Calls Weren’t
Tapped By Feds,” the New York Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=039-8aa&t=c>
(5/3, Golding) reports “Giuliani cast doubt Thursday on a report that the
feds wiretapped...Cohen – and he was right.” Speaking to the Daily Beast
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=03a-d4d&t=c>
(5/3, Woodruff), Giuliani said of the original NBC story, “Us lawyers have
talked about it, we don’t believe it’s true. ... We think it’s going to
turn out to be untrue because it would be totally illegal. You can’t
wiretap a lawyer, you certainly can’t wiretap his client who’s not involved
in the investigation.” In an interview with The Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=03b-89c&t=c>
(5/3, Stanage), Giuliani also “called for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to
intervene in the...Cohen case and put the people behind the probe ‘under
investigation.’” Said Giuliani, “I am waiting for the Attorney General to
step in, in his role as defender of justice, and put these people under
investigation.”

        *In Tweet Today, Trump Slams NBC Over Retracted Report. *Trump
tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=03c-105&t=c>
today, “NBC NEWS is wrong again! They cite ‘sources’ which are constantly
wrong. Problem is, like so many others, the sources probably don’t exist,
they are fabricated, fiction! NBC, my former home with the Apprentice, is
now as bad as Fake News CNN. Sad!”

        *Daniels: Cohen Unqualified To Clean “My Horse’s Manure.” *The New
York Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=03d-e56&t=c>
(5/3, Moore) reports “Stormy Daniels blasted...Cohen as unqualified to
clean up ‘my horse’s manure’ and tussled with Twitter users on Thursday
after...Giuliani dropped a bombshell about a $130,000 payment she received
weeks before the 2016 election.” Tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=03e-9fb&t=c>
Daniels, “I don’t think Cohen is qualified to ‘clean up’ my horse’s manure.
Too soon? #basta #TeamStormy.”

        *Comey Objects To Giuliani’s FBI “Stormtroopers” Comment. *The New
York Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=03f-ca0&t=c>
(5/3, Moore) reports “Giuliani and former FBI Director James Comey clashed
on Thursday after the former mayor accused the FBI of behaving like
‘stormtroopers’ when they raided...Cohen last month.” Comey said on Twitter
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=040-6b3&t=c>,
“I know the New York FBI. There are no ‘stormtroopers’ there; just a group
of people devoted to the rule of law and the truth. ... Our country would
be better off if our leaders tried to be like them, rather than comparing
them to Nazis.”
Giuliani Says Mueller Probe “Dead,” Calls On Sessions To Bring It To An End.

The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=041-3ef&t=c>
(5/3, Wagner) reports that on Thursday, Rudy Giuliani “asserted that the
original aim of the special counsel – to investigate possible collusion
between the Trump campaign and Russia in the 2016 campaign – is now
‘dead.’” In an appearance on Fox Business
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=042-bbf&t=c>
(5/3), Giuliani argued Attorney General Sessions “should bring the
investigation to an end,” saying, “Sessions should step in and close it and
say enough is enough.” In regards to a potential interview with Robert
Mueller and his team, Giuliani said, “They’re going to have to convince us
they’re going to be objective and they are not out to get us. ... They
should be able to do this, if they have a case, in two or three hours.” In
an interview with ABC News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=043-50f&t=c>
(5/3, Santucci), Giuliani said he “is already anticipating one possible
battle – a subpoena for...Trump to testify.” Said Giuliani, “I think it’s
50/50. ... But I got to prepare for that 50 percent.”

        Sean Hannity said in his opening monologue on [image: Image removed
by sender. Video]Fox News’ Hannity
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=044-e9d&t=c>
(5/3), “We had a interview with Rudy Giuliani and reports insight in the
legal team. And now Rudy Giuliani called out Robert Mueller’s witch hunt.”
After showing clips from the interview, Hannity added, “All of those
crucial developments that you just watched and we aired live on this
program, were largely ignored by the abusive, biased news media.”

        Judge Andrew Napolitano, appearing on [image: Image removed by
sender. Video]Fox News’ Fox & Friends
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=045-5eb&t=c>
(5/3), said, “I don’t know as much about this as Rudy does, obviously, and
I have great respect for him,” but “I don’t think it’s wise to be
negotiating in public or on television. It sometimes insults the other
side. You want to cut a deal with Bob Mueller.” Napolitano added, “You
think that Jim Comey is a liar? A lot of people think Jim Comey is a liar,”
but “that’s the kind of argument you make to your adversary in private and
you demonstrate why you think that is. You don’t necessarily go on national
television and say it.”

        *Latest Addition To Mueller Team Also A Registered Democrat,
Clinton Contributor. *The Daily Caller
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=046-4ed&t=c>
(5/3, Ross) reports “the latest addition to...Mueller’s team of prosecutors
contributed to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign.” Uzo Asonye,
“an assistant US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, is joining
Mueller’s stable of prosecutors to work as local counsel on the case
against Paul Manafort.” He is a registered Democrat who “donated $900 to
Clinton’s presidential campaign,” and “has not donated to any other
national political campaigns since then.” The DC adds “Asonye is just the
latest Democrat to join Mueller’s team,” where “none” of the “prosecutors,
which number nearly 20 in all, are registered Republicans. As of February,
13 Mueller lawyers were registered Democrats,” and “at least 12...have
donated to Democratic political candidates.” The DC also notes “Andrew
Weissmann, a Justice Department lawyer handling the Manafort case for
Mueller’s team, reportedly attended Hillary Clinton’s election night
party,” and “has donated $6,600 to the Democratic National Committee and
the Clinton and Obama campaigns.”

        *NYTimes: Giuliani Contradicted Trump On Comey Firing. *The New
York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=047-6e6&t=c>
(5/3, Schmidt) reports that in his Hannity interview, Giuliani
“contradicted Mr. Trump’s rationale for firing” FBI Director James Comey,
“saying he was dismissed because he would not say publicly what he had told
the president privately: that Mr. Trump was not under scrutiny in the
Russia investigation at the time.” Said Giuliani, “He fired Comey because
Comey would not, among other things, say that he wasn’t a target of the
investigation. ... He’s entitled to that.” The Times adds that “Giuliani’s
comments about Mr. Comey were overshadowed by his disclosure that Mr. Trump
reimbursed” his personal attorney Michael Cohen on an unrelated matter, but
his “assertion contradicted the myriad explanations that the president and
his aides have given for the firing, and was the first public
acknowledgment by a Trump adviser for what Mr. Comey has maintained: that
he was fired for his handling of the Russia investigation.”

        *Law Professor Worked For FBI For 19 Months As He Defended Comey In
Media. *Fox News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=048-76f&t=c>
(5/3, Herridge) reported this afternoon that Columbia law professor Daniel
Richman, who Comey “used as an intermediary to help leak details of
sensitive memos, worked as an FBI ‘special government employee’ for at
least 19 months – during which time he repeatedly defended the FBI director
in media interviews amid the Hillary Clinton email probe.” According to
Fox, “Sources familiar with Richman’s FBI status said he was assigned to
‘special projects’ by Comey, and had a security clearance as well as badge
access to the building.”

        *Mueller Requests 70 Blank Subpoenas. *The Washington Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=049-8ea&t=c>
(5/3, Cohen) reports “Mueller on Thursday filed a request for 70 blank
subpoenas in the Eastern District of Virginia, where...Manafort lives.” The
Examiner adds “the two-page filing reveals little, but says that that each
subpoena recipient must appear in the Alexandria, Va., courthouse on July
10 to testify in the case.”

        *Manafort Attorney: Mueller Has No Evidence Manafort Communicated
With Russia. *The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=04a-863&t=c>
(5/3, Scarborough) reports “a defense attorney in a court filing
says...Mueller has disclosed he has no evidence that...Manafort
communicated with Russian government officials.” The Times adds that “if
the attorney is accurate, it delivers another credibility blow to the
Democratic Party-financed dossier, which accuses Mr. Manafort of
orchestrating Trump-Russia collusion.” Attorney Kevin Downing “filed the
brief April 30 in the special counsel’s money-laundering case against his
client. Those charges are confined to millions of dollars he earned as a
political consultant for Ukrainian politicians.”

        *Caputo: Mueller Appears To Be “Completely Focused On Collusion
With Russia.” *ABC’s Good Morning
America
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=04b-302&t=c>
(5/3, Roberts) reported on former Trump adviser Michael Caputo’s
description of being interviewed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team.
Pierre Thomas reported that Caputo “said the agents knew so much about his
life, it scared him.” Caputo: “They know everything. They know more about
what I did in 2016 than I do. They’re talking about the timing of some
things that happened at the campaign and at the convention. I think they’re
completely focused on collusion with Russia. ... I believe that they think
they’re on to something. What that is, I don’t know, but they’re not
messing around.” Thomas went on to report that Caputo “says they peppered
him with questions about his friend, the President’s personal attorney
Michael Cohen, Paul Manafort who has been indicted on money laundering
charges, and Roger Stone.” However, Caputo said, “It was remarkable to me
that the President wasn’t brought up. Nobody with the last name Trump came
up at all.”

        The Washington Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=04c-914&t=c>
(5/3, Correll) reports that Caputo also told [image: Image removed by
sender. Video]Fox News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=04d-2ba&t=c>
host Martha MacCallum that Mueller “has more knowledge about the Trump
campaign than any staff member of the campaign, and has a plethora of
documentation.” Said Caputo, “They have all the documents that were
produced. ... They’ve got further documentation from people who worked
outside the campaign – their emails, their texts. They have the entire
campaign’s texts.” Caputo added that “‘it doesn’t sound like’ investigators
have uncovered proof the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin during
the 2016 election.”

        *DeSantis Blasts Rosenstein For Failing To Hand Over Material On
Clinton Probe. *Appearing on Fox
News’ Fox & Friends
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=04e-960&t=c>
(5/3, Kilmeade), Rep. Ron DeSantis claimed that Deputy Attorney General Rod
Rosenstein is “showing contempt for Congress and our constitutional
oversight responsibility. ... We have been going for these documents for
months and months and months. And what do they do? They stonewall,
stonewall, trickle some out. We say, ‘well, maybe we’ll do contempt,’ and
they trickle some more out.” DeSantis added, “If you remember the Nunes
memo, people like Rod were saying we can’t do a Nunes memo because that
will devastate American national security. It had nothing to do with that.
... We have a right to this information. ... We want everything from the
end of the Hillary case through Peter Strzok – McCabe, Comey, the whole lot
of them.”

        *WPost Editorial: President With Respect For Rule Of Law Would Want
Probe Details Kept Secret. *In an editorial, the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=04f-48d&t=c>
(5/3) writes on “what a more presidential president might say” if they had
“respect for the rule of law”: that sensitive details of ongoing Justice
Department investigations “must be kept secret, even from – especially from
– political leaders.” The Post adds that such a president would also say,
“This principle of independent, apolitical law enforcement is what
distinguishes us from a banana republic, where police powers are wielded to
benefit or punish one party or another.”
Foreign Policy
Trump, Giuliani Hint At Imminent Release Of US Prisoners From North Korea.

Media reports Thursday continued to cast President Trump and his attorney,
Rudy Giuliani, as indicating that three American prisoners held in North
Korea will soon be released. ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by
sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=050-1b5&t=c>
(5/3, story 6, 2:00, Muir), for example, said Trump and Giuliani are
“raising hopes” that the hostages will be released. Giuliani on Thursday
morning said, “We got Kim Jong-Un impressed enough to be releasing three
prisoners today,” while Trump tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=051-040&t=c>
Wednesday evening, “The past administration has long been asking for three
hostages to be released from a North Korean labor camp, but to no avail.
Stay tuned.” ABC (Raddatz) added that the “State Department would not
confirm anything about the release of the prisoners, but a local activist
is reporting that the men have been moved from a labor camp to a medical
facility.”

        NBC Nightly News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=052-4bc&t=c>
(5/3, story 9, 2:00, Holt) reported that the “White House [is] not
confirming the Americans are being let go, but saying their release would
be a sign of goodwill.” Regardless, Giuliani’s apparent “preview [of] an
imminent development” and Trump’s “tantalizing hint” about the three
prisoners was “promising news for Sol Kim, whose father Tony Kim has been
missing in North Korea for a year.” On CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image
removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=053-855&t=c>
(5/3), Paula Hancocks reported from the Korean Peninsula where “an official
whose familiar with the ongoing negotiations is saying the release of the
three is imminent. There’s no more specific timing, but that it is
imminent.” Hancocks added that the release “has been months in the making.
We understand from this official that” North Korean Foreign Minister Ri
Yong-ho “went to Sweden in March...and...proposed releasing these three
detainees, although the US does not want it linked to denuclearization.”

        While the network reports on the prisoners did not mention
Secretary of State Pompeo, Brian Todd reported on CNN’s Situation Room[image:
Image removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=054-6fa&t=c>
(5/3) that “by all indications,” Pompeo “played a major role” in the
potential release of the prisoners during his secret meeting with Kim
Jong-Un at the beginning of April when he was still CIA director. A “US
official says [Pompeo] raised that issue of the detained Americans then.
The people that really know about the negotiations say they have no doubt
Pompeo’s trip got this moving. It might have been the decisive factor in
the release, if it indeed happens soon.” Noting that the news about the
hostages comes ahead of a possible sit-down between Trump and Kim Jong-Un, Fox
News’ Special Report
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=055-4d3&t=c>
(5/3) reported that Pompeo is “now leading preparations” for that summit,
while Vice President Pence has canceled a Latin America trip “to focus on
the meeting.”

        *Garamendi: Pompeo Should Be Announcing Prisoners’ Release, Not
Giuliani. *Rep. John Garamendi said on [image: Image removed by sender.
Video]CNN’s Situation Room
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=056-583&t=c>
(5/3) that it was “inappropriate” for Giuliani to be discussing the
prisoners, adding, “this is the new Secretary of State’s territory.
Certainly if we had heard that from Secretary Pompeo, I think we would all
be elated...and hopefully Secretary Pompeo will carry through on what was
his initial effort...not only with regard to the three Americans but also
setting up the eventual summit between” Trump and Kim.

        *Hannity: Media Ignoring “Hopeful News” On North Korea. *Sean
Hannity said in his opening monologue on Fox News’ Hannity[image: Image
removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=057-9b8&t=c>
(5/3), “We have actual news of three Americans long held hostage with Kim
Jong-un, Little Rocket Man. President Trump is working on their release and
hinting of hopeful news on Twitter. ... . And your major media is yawning
and Kim Jong-un is making concessions and talking about denuclearization of
the Korean peninsula and historic unemployment and the media yawns and
Americans receiving unemployment is lowest since 1973, and the media could
care less. ... Do you need more proof that the media in this country
doesn’t care about the truth and doing their job and you? They care about
their liberal left-wing agenda. And like a huge massive echo chamber with
overpaid spoiled brat anchors that do not do their job.”

        *Trump Orders Pentagon To Prepare Reduction Of Forces Options In
South Korea. *The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=058-4da&t=c>
(5/3, Landler) reports Trump has “ordered the Pentagon to prepare options
for drawing down American troops in South Korea, just weeks before he holds
a landmark meeting with North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, according to
several people briefed on the deliberations.” Officials said reduced troop
levels are “not intended to be a bargaining chip in Mr. Trump’s talks with
Mr. Kim,” but they “acknowledged that a peace treaty between the two Koreas
could diminish the need for the 28,500 soldiers currently stationed on the
peninsula.” Officials declined to say whether Trump was seeking options for
“a full or partial reduction of troops, though a full withdrawal was
unlikely.”

        *WPost: Moon Looking For Ways To Help North’s Economy Without
Violating Sanctions. *The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=059-7b8&t=c>
(5/3, Fifield) reports that the “ink on the inter-Korean agreement is
barely dry and the definition of ‘complete denuclearization’ is far from
clear, but there is already plenty of talk in Seoul about how to help North
Korea’s economic development.” According to the Post, Moon has ordered
officials “to start figuring out what economic engagement projects can be
undertaken without contravening existing sanctions and to look at what
should be delayed until after Kim and Trump meet.” The move, however, is
“already causing heartburn among hard-liners in Washington who view the
South Korean president as too willing to take Kim at his word.”

        *Kim Tells Chinese FM He Is Committed To Denuclearization. *Citing
China’s foreign ministry, Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=05a-8b1&t=c>
(5/3, Brice) reports that on Thursday, Kim Jong Un “told the Chinese
government’s top diplomat, State Councilor Wang Yi...that he is committed
to denuclearization. ... ‘Kim Jong Un said achieving the denuclearization
of the peninsula is the firm position of the North Korean side,’ China’s
foreign ministry said after Wang met Kim in Pyongyang.” The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=05b-af3&t=c>
(5/3) reports Wang “congratulated...Kim...on his moves to reduce tensions
with South Korea, China said.”

        *South Korean National Security Adviser In US To Meet Bolton. *
Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=05c-ba9&t=c>
(5/3) reports South Korean National Security Adviser Chung Eui-Yong is in
Washington to meet with National Security Adviser Bolton ahead of the
expected summit between Trump and Kim. A South Korean presidential official
told reporters Friday that the National Security Council “asked Chung...to
fly to the United States to discuss matters related to the summit.” That
official, who declined to be identified, added that the US “had asked that
the visit be kept quiet due to the issues to be addressed at meetings
there.” A “senior Administration official” confirmed Chung’s visit and his
meeting with Bolton.
US, China Conclude First Day Of Trade Talks.

Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=05d-7b4&t=c>
(5/3) reports that the Administration’s trade delegation to China “held
their first day of key talks in Beijing on Thursday, without giving any
sense of progress on a deal to stop an escalation of trade barriers.”
According to Bloomberg, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin, Commerce Secretary
Ross, USTR Lighthizer and NEC director Larry Kudlow all “declined to
comment to reporters on arrival at their hotel after meetings and a dinner
with their Chinese counterparts.” Bloomberg says the Administration “has
tempered expectations of a major breakthrough from the discussions, which
are expected to focus on US concerns over China’s state-driven economy,
forced technology transfers and America’s widening trade deficit.” Bloomberg
News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=05e-68a&t=c>
(5/3) reports separately that “China’s largest news outlets have been
ordered to refrain from reporting any material beyond official press
releases related to trade talks in Beijing with the US.”

        Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=05f-ce5&t=c>
(5/3, Martina) says President Trump on Thursday “praised his relationship
with Chinese President Xi Jinping” as the talks were ongoing in Beijing.
Reuters adds that “it was not clear when Trump and Xi might meet again
next, though both will likely attend some of the same multilateral summits
this year, including those of the G20 and APEC.” The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=060-40d&t=c>
(5/3, Wei) also covers the first day of talks. The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=061-b63&t=c>
(5/3, Wong, Chan) says Trump is “seeking to cut the chronic US trade
deficit by $100 billion,” and “has threatened to impose new tariffs on
roughly $150 billion in Chinese goods.” According to the AP, “Washington’s
recent decision to ban Chinese telecom gear maker ZTE from importing US
components in a sanctions-related case drove home to Beijing its costly
vulnerability to foreign sources for advanced microchips.”

        The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=062-16c&t=c>
(5/3, Bradsher) says the Chinese government is “struggling to find people
in Washington who can provide insight into the Trump administration’s
aggressive moves on trade.” According to the Times, “One senior American
trade official tried to help – and wound up in Beijing with little to do
but check out the pottery.” The “trade official” is Alan Wolff, described
by the Times as a “veteran senior adviser to the top United States trade
representative.” The Times says Wolff “sought to make contact with top
Chinese policymakers,” but was unsuccessful.

        *Fox’s Bolton: US, China “Preparing For A Potential Trade
War.” *Deirdre
Bolton reported on Fox News’ Special Report[image: Image removed by sender.
Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=063-1b2&t=c>
(5/3) that a US delegation is in China to discuss trade, but Beijing and
Washington “are so far apart on significant issues, it’s going to take more
than 48 hours to find solutions,” and “trade experts say that the most
positive outcome would be an agreement to keep negotiating.” Bolton said
both countries are “talking tough,” and “both are preparing for a potential
trade war.” In fact, she continued, “Bloomberg is reporting
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=064-8bb&t=c>
that China has essentially stopped buying American soybeans.” The US,
meanwhile, is “slow-walking potential Chinese purchases of US companies,
and in other cases outright blocking investment in the US.”

        *Rubio: China Planning To Undermine US Competitiveness. *Sen. Marco
Rubio said on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight[image: Image removed by
sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=065-c94&t=c>
(5/3) that China has “a plan to undermine not just our competitiveness, but
the competitiveness of every country in the world, and become the dominant
nation, dominant economic, industrial, and technological power. And they
are using multiple tools, including intellectual property theft, to do
that. Not only are they undermining our industrial base, they are also
undermining our technological base through something called ‘Made in China
2025’ where they plan to supplant not just America, but all the countries
in the West on automobiles, in passenger aircraft, in computing and
artificial intelligence. They have laid out the entire industries and are
slowly and surely carrying out this plan.”
US Warns Of Consequences For China’s South China Sea Militarization.

Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=066-179&t=c>
(5/3) reports the White House said Thursday that Washington “has raised
concerns with China about its latest militarization of the South China Sea
and there will be near-term and long-term consequences.” CNBC reported
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=067-759&t=c>
Wednesday that China had installed anti-ship cruise missiles and
surface-to-air missile systems on three outposts in the South China Sea.
Asked about the report, Press Secretary Sarah Sanders told reporters,
“We’re well aware of China’s militarization of the South China Sea. We’ve
raised concerns directly with the Chinese about this and there will be
near-term and long-term consequences.” She “did not say what the
consequences might be.”

        *US Complains To China Over Lasers Aimed At Aircraft In Djibouti. *
Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=068-620&t=c>
(5/3) reports that the Pentagon said on Thursday that the US “formally
complained to China after Chinese nationals pointed lasers at US military
aircraft near Djibouti in a number of incidents in recent weeks.” According
to Reuters, “The US military has been grappling with lasers being pointed
at aircraft for decades. However, the incidents highlight the concern the
United States has about a Chinese military base just miles from a critical
US base in Djibouti.” The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=069-276&t=c>
(5/3, A1, Lubold, Page) also covers the US complaint, and the Washington
Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=06a-94e&t=c>
(5/3, Sonne) reports Pentagon spokeswoman Dana W. White said at a briefing
Thursday, “It’s a serious matter. And we’re taking it very seriously.” The
Post notes that both the US and China have military bases in Djibouti.
According to the AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=06b-d31&t=c>
(5/3, Baldor), Pentagon spokesman Marine Lt. Col. Chris Logan said the
lasers “were military grade and came from the Chinese base nearby.”
Iranian Officials: Nuclear Deal Will Not Be Renegotiated.

Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=06c-58c&t=c>
(5/3) reports that on Thursday, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad
Zarif “said...US demands to change its 2015 nuclear agreement with world
powers were unacceptable.” Zarif is quoted as saying, “Iran will not
renegotiate what was agreed years ago and has been implemented.” Also on
Thursday, Ali Akbar Velayati, “a senior adviser to Iranian Supreme Leader
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei...warned Europeans...over ‘revising’ the nuclear
deal.” Velayati said, “Even if US allies, especially the Europeans, try to
revise the deal...one of our options will be withdrawing from it.”

        The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=06d-003&t=c>
(5/3, Karimi, Gambrell) reports that Zarif said, “On 11 occasions since,
the UN nuclear watchdog has confirmed that Iran has implemented all of its
obligations. In contrast, the US has consistently violated the agreement,
especially by bullying others from doing business with Iran.” However, the
AP says, “while directly criticizing the US and Europe, Zarif did appear to
leave some wiggle room for possible negotiations.”

        *Tehran Detains More Iranians With British Ties. *The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=06e-824&t=c>
(5/3, Erdbrink, Gladstone) reports Iran’s intelligence operatives have
arrested “two, and possibly three, Iranians with British connections in the
past two months, human rights activists and others said Thursday. At least
two of the Iranians are also British citizens, and their arrests may be
part of an attempt by the Iranian authorities to gain leverage in an old
dispute with Britain over more than $400 million in undelivered weaponry.”

        *Iranian-Americans Plan DC Rally For Regime Change. *The Washington
Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=06f-b3f&t=c>
(5/3, Taylor) reports that Iranian-Americans who want “regime change” in
Tehran are holding “a major conference in the District of Columbia this
weekend to support the protests that have arisen inside Iran against the
Islamic Republic’s hard-line government in recent months.” Saturday’s
conference will feature speeches Rudy Giuliani and former Gov. Bill
Richardson.
NYTimes: US Special Forces Secretly Help Saudis Combat Houthi Rebels.

The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=070-f48&t=c>
(5/3, Cooper, Gibbons-Neff, Schmitt) reports that while the American
military has “sought to distance itself from a brutal civil war in Yemen,”
late last year “a team of about a dozen Green Berets arrived on Saudi
Arabia’s border with Yemen, in a continuing escalation of America’s secret
wars.” With “virtually no public discussion or debate, the Army commandos
are helping locate and destroy caches of ballistic missiles and launch
sites that Houthi rebels in Yemen are using to attack Riyadh and other
Saudi cities.” Details of the operation, “which has not been previously
disclosed, were provided to The New York Times by United States officials
and European diplomats,” and “appear to contradict Pentagon statements that
American military assistance to the Saudi-led campaign in Yemen is limited
to aircraft refueling, logistics and general intelligence sharing.”

        The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=071-8c0&t=c>
(5/3) editorializes that the Pentagon and the Administration “apparently
have misled Americans about growing military involvement in a war in Yemen
that we should have nothing to do with.” The Times argues that “such
significant military decisions require public debate to force presidents
and their generals to justify their decisions and be held accountable for
the consequences.” It goes on to call on Congress to cut off military aid
to Saudi Arabia and vote “to bar the use of American troops against the
Houthis in Yemen.”

        *Hundreds Of Thousands Of Yemeni Children In Danger Of Starvation. *The
AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=072-6e6&t=c>
(5/3, Michael) reports that in Yemen, “around 2.9 million women and
children are acutely malnourished; another 400,000 children are fighting
for their lives.” According to the AP, “Aid agencies warn that parts of
Yemen could soon start to see widespread death from famine.” The AP notes
that last year, Save the Children “estimated that 50,000 children may have
died in 2017 of extreme hunger or disease.”
Vice: Military Base Buildup Suggests US “Shadow War” In Somalia Is
Expanding.

The “US military is dramatically expanding its operations at a former
Soviet air strip in Somalia, constructing more than 800 beds at the
Baledogle base,” Vice
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=073-0c5&t=c>
(5/3) has learned, marking “the latest example of America’s growing and
controversial shadow war in Africa.” Multiple defense contractors told Vice
that the expansion at Baledogle is “one part of what appears to be a
massive US military infrastructure development project in” Somalia “that
will see at least six new US outposts built this year.” This comes amid “an
aggressive escalation by US forces in their fight against al Qaida-linked
al-Shabaab.” US Africa Command has more than 500 US military personnel in
Somalia, according to a spokeswoman – a “dramatic” increase from 2016 – and
“since January 2017, US forces have conducted at least 48 airstrikes in
Somalia, compared to 14 in 2016 and 11 in 2015,” according to the
London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism.
UK Lawmakers Push For Trump To Address Parliament During July Visit.

AFP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=074-999&t=c>
(5/3) reports British lawmakers are “pushing for US President Donald Trump
to address parliament during a July visit, despite apparent opposition from
the speaker of the House of Commons, according to reports on Thursday.”
Conservative Patrick Cormack, “one of Britain’s longest-serving lawmakers,”
said that as the leader of “our most important ally,” Trump should be
allowed to deliver a speech to Parliament. Said Cormack, “My own personal
views on him are completely irrelevant – we should give him the opportunity
to speak to both Houses.”

        *May Fends Off Labour Party Challenge In Local Election. *The New
York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=075-1a6&t=c>
(5/4, Castle) reports that “despite mounting troubles over Britain’s
withdrawal from the European Union, Prime Minister Theresa May and her
Conservative Party emerged relatively unscathed from local elections,
according to results released on Friday.” According to the Times, “mixed
results from across the country meant the opposition Labour Party failed to
achieve the big, if symbolic, gains it was hoping for.” Labour was,
however, “victorious in some key areas, but it fell short in its efforts to
take control of two Conservative strongholds in London — Westminster and
Wandsworth — that had been thought to be vulnerable, as well as the
capital’s northern borough of Barnet, a much easier target.”
Domestic Policy
Repealing Obama-Era Restrictions, Trump Announces Faith-Based Initiative.

The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=076-5a6&t=c>
(5/3, Superville) reports that President Trump celebrated
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=077-1df&t=c>
the National Day of Prayer at the White House today and announced an
“initiative that he said would underpin policies recognizing the ‘vital
role’ of religion in the country.” Trump “signed an executive order
creating a ‘White House Faith and Opportunity Initiative’ that will, among
other things, make recommendations on policies that affect faith-based and
community programs,” according to the AP. The AP says the President also
“outlined steps by the administration to safeguard religious freedom and
pledged to continue doing so.”

        USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=078-e6b&t=c>
(5/3, Korte) says Trump’s “executive order repeals Obama administration
rules limiting the ability of groups getting federal funds to preach to
those they serve.” USA Today adds that “under the Trump order, faith-based
groups will no longer have to refer beneficiaries to alternative programs
if they object to the religious teachings.” The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=079-207&t=c>
(5/3, Bailey) reports that while “faith-based offices were considered major
announcements under the last three presidents,” Trump’s announcement “came
as a surprise to many observers.” The Post says “it was absent from the
White House daily schedule and some attendees said they were told only of
the National Day of Prayer blessing and nothing of the executive order.”
According to the Post, “A similar version of the office was first created
by President George W. Bush in 2001 with a mandate to partner with and
serve as a resource to the faith community.”

        The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=07a-034&t=c>
(5/3, Boyer) notes Trump said, “This office will also help ensure that
faith-based organizations have equal access to government funding and the
equal right to exercise their deeply held beliefs. ... We take this step
because we know that in solving the many, many problems and our great
challenges, faith is more powerful than government, and nothing is more
powerful than God.” Townhall
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=07b-6e5&t=c>
(5/3, Pavlich) indicates “the White House Faith Based Opportunity
Initiative will be led by someone inside the administration, who will
report directly to...Trump on ways to better streamline programs beneficial
to religious groups.”

        Breitbart
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=07c-d39&t=c>
(5/3, Moons) notes “six faith leaders from a variety of backgrounds took to
the stage to pray,” and “each took a turn praying in front of the crowd
gathered: Cissie Graham Lynch of Samaritan’s Purse; Rabbi Levi Shemtov of
The Rabbinical Council of Greater Washington; Cardinal Donald Wuerl,
archbishop of Washington; Jean B. Bingham, general president of the Relief
Society, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; Dawud Abdul-Aziz
Agbere, lieutenant colonel, US Army Chaplain Corps; and Narayanachar
Digalakote, priest at the Sri Siva Vishnu Temple in Lanham, Maryland.”

        *Trump Says More People Saying “Merry Christmas,” “Under God” Since
His Election. *USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=07d-9f9&t=c>
(5/3, Cummings) reports that Trump “expanded on a favorite theme during
Thursday’s National Day of Prayer address, saying that Americans have begun
not only to use the holiday greeting ‘merry Christmas’ more since he moved
into the White House, but that they have started to say ‘under God’ more as
well.”

        *Townhall: Press’ Focus On Daniels Scandal During Event “Offended
Some Attendees.” *Townhall
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=07e-b3c&t=c>
(5/3, Brown) reports that as “Trump greeted religious leaders at the White
House Thursday and established a new faith-based office on the National Day
of Prayer, many in the press were so focused on the Stormy Daniels scandal
that they disrupted the event and offended some attendees.” Townhall adds
that “moments before the prayer event began, CNN reporter Kaitlan Collins
did a live segment on the porn star scandal and received some questioning
glances from the crowd.” Moreover, “as the event was concluding, a reporter
shouted a question about Stormy Daniels as the president was leaving.” In
its report on the White House event, the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=07f-fb9&t=c>
(5/3, Bailey) says that “the timing...comes as Trump continues to receive
attention for a settlement his lawyer paid to...Daniels, an actress in
pornographic films who has she said she had an affair with the president
more than a decade ago.”
Dozens Of Caravan Migrants Begin Pleading Cases.

Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=080-25f&t=c>
(5/3) reports, “Dozens more Central American caravan migrants were let into
the United States to begin pleading their case for asylum on Thursday
despite sharp criticism” from President Trump, “bringing the total to 158
since last weekend. ... Seventy men, women and children were allowed into
the crowded port of entry border crossing early Thursday morning,” and
“another 62 migrants were still waiting for a chance to begin the asylum
process.”

        *In Tweet Today, Trump Says Border “Under Siege,” Calls On Congress
To “Act Now.” *Trump tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=081-b7d&t=c>
this morning, “Our Southern Border is under siege. Congress must act now to
change our weak and ineffective immigration laws. Must build a Wall.
Mexico, which has a massive crime problem, is doing little to help!”

        *Illegal Entry Into US Over Mexican Border Up 233%
Year-Over-Year. *Despite
that CBP data, the Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=082-ef4&t=c>
(5/3, Dinan) reports that “illegal immigration across the southwest border
rose again in April, continuing a surge that has entirely erased President
Trump’s early gains and left officials in Washington struggling over
answers.” Nearly 39,000 people “were nabbed by the Border Patrol last
month...a staggering 233 percent increase over the same month a year ago.”

        *Mexican Ambassador: “We Believe In Having Secure Borders.” *Mexican
Ambassador to the US Gerónimo Gutiérrez said on Fox News’ Ingraham Angle[image:
Image removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=083-db0&t=c>
(5/3), “We have very good cooperation with CBP and DHS. We don’t see
eyeball on eyeball to everything. ... Borders exist for a reason and good
borders make good neighbors. Now that is not what everybody believes in
Mexico, we believe in having secure borders. We are working very closely in
that regard with the United States.”
Pruitt Did Not Disclose He Bought Oklahoma House With Lobbyist In 2003.

The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=084-14d&t=c>
(5/3, Tabuchi, Eder) reports that in 2003, when he was an Oklahoma state
senator, EPA Administrator Pruitt “bought a home in the state capital with
a registered lobbyist who was pushing for changes to the state’s workers’
compensation rules – changes that Mr. Pruitt championed in the
legislature.” The Times says Pruitt “never publicly disclosed his financial
relationship with the lobbyist, who, like Mr. Pruitt, lived in the home
when in Oklahoma City on business.”

        *“Well-Connected Friends” Helped Fund Pruitt’s Travel. *The Washington
Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=085-7ae&t=c>
(5/3, A1, Eilperin, Dennis) reports on its front page that Pruitt “enlisted
well-connected friends and political allies” to help fund his trips abroad.
After taking office, Pruitt “drew up a list of at least a dozen countries
he hoped to visit and urged aides to help him find official reasons to
travel, according to four people familiar with the matter.” The Post
reports that “Republican megadonor Sheldon Adelson...arranged parts of
Pruitt’s visit” to Israel, while “longtime Pruitt friend Richard
Smotkin...helped arrange Pruitt’s four-day visit to Morocco.” Matthew
Freedman of the American Australian Council “helped line up a September
trip to Australia,” though the trip was cancelled.

        *Another EPA Official Exits. *Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=086-bd0&t=c>
(5/3, Dlouhy, Jacobs) reports that “a third top EPA official is leaving the
agency amid intensifying scrutiny of Pruitt’s travel, spending and condo
rental.” Associate Administrator Liz Bowman, the EPA’s “top public affairs
official,” according to Bloomberg, is exiting to become a spokeswoman for
Sen. Joni Ernst. Bloomberg notes that “Bowman’s departure follows two
others just this week: the exit of Albert ‘Kell’ Kelly, the top EPA adviser
on Superfund cleanups, and former Secret Service agent Pasquale ‘Nino’
Perrotta, who led Pruitt’s security detail.” Bloomberg points out that
“there are at least 10 formal investigations into Pruitt.” The Washington
Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=087-520&t=c>
(5/3, Grandoni) says “other senior EPA officials also could leave in the
coming weeks, according to two individuals who spoke on the condition of
anonymity to discuss personnel matters.”
WSJournal A1: Large Public Companies’ Earnings Growth Coming From Tax Cuts.

In a front-page article titled, “Lower Tax Bills Fuel Best Earnings Quarter
Since 2011: More than Half Of The Total Profit Growth In The First Quarter
Stemmed From A Decline In Tax Rates,” the Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=088-ec5&t=c>
(5/3, A1, Francis, Rubin) reports that Calcbench has determined that a
majority of large public companies’ net-income growth can be attributed to
the tax cuts passed by Congress last year. One-third of the 200 companies
surveyed said their tax bills had decreased even though they made more
money than the previous year.

        *Hollywood Producers Benefiting From Trump Tax Cut “Windfalls.” *Under
the headline, “The Big Winners Under Trump’s Tax Cuts Are His Loudest
Critics,” Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=089-d61&t=c>
(5/3, Steverman) reports, “In a surprise plot twist, President Donald
Trump’s new tax law is delivering many of its juiciest benefits to his most
vocal critics in Hollywood.” According to Bloomberg, “The tax overhaul
doles out windfalls to the producers and film financiers who control the
entertainment industry,” and “slashes tax rates, especially on overseas
profits that are the lifeblood of Hollywood.”

        *White House Scales Back Plans To Recoup Already-Approved Federal
Spending. *Citing “two GOP congressional aides,” Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=08a-234&t=c>
(5/3, Fitzpatrick, Wasson) reports that the White House is “scaling back
its plan to seek cuts from already-passed spending bills in the face of
resistance from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and spending panel
Republicans.” Bloomberg says OMB Director Mulvaney “plans to ask Congress
on Monday to cancel $11 billion in unspent money from prior years, a much
lower figure than the $63 billion request originally floated to Congress
last month.” Bloomberg adds that “the new request won’t touch the $1.3
trillion fiscal 2018 spending bill Trump reluctantly signed in March.”
Arizona Teachers End Walkout After Getting 20% Pay Raise.

The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=08b-483&t=c>
(5/3, Snow, Tang) reports “the Arizona governor signed a plan Thursday to
give striking teachers a 20 percent pay raise, ending their five-day
walkout after a dramatic all-night legislative session and sending more
than a million public school students back to the classroom.” Gov. Doug
Ducey’s “signature awarded teachers a 9 percent raise in the fall and 5
percent in each of the next two years. Those increases are in addition to a
1 percent raise granted last year.” The Arizona Republic
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=08c-b83&t=c>
(5/2, Ruelas) notes “pay raises were not the only demand of the grassroots
group that organized the walkout, Arizona Educators United,” as “others
included a reversal of cuts made in the past decade, a halting of tax cuts
and increased salaries for support staff.” Teachers also “wanted a 20
percent increase in one year, not three.”

        The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=08d-850&t=c>
(5/3, Goldstein) reports that “in Arizona, as in Oklahoma, legislators
refused requests to raise income taxes on the wealthy, and instead turned
to a hodgepodge of revenue sources that are likely to hit a wide range of
voters.” The Times adds that “the funding increase in Arizona will come in
part from a new vehicle registration fee and a change in the way some
school desegregation efforts are paid for. Lawmakers in Oklahoma pushed
through taxes on tobacco, motor fuels, gambling and online sales, in
addition to a higher production tax on oil and gas.”

        The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=08e-42c&t=c>
(5/3, Balingit) reports that “in a joint statement, Arizona Education
Association President Joe Thomas and National Education Association
President Lily Eskelsen García said the walkout was the beginning of a
movement to press the state to restore budget cuts.” They wrote, “We will
return to our schools, classrooms, and students knowing that we have
achieved something truly historic. ... We should take pride in what we have
accomplished, and in the movement that we have created together.” NPR
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=08f-4d6&t=c>
(5/3, Dwyer) and the Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=090-f93&t=c>
(5/3, Hobbs), among other news outlets, run similar stories this morning.
Ryan Reverses Ouster Of House Chaplain Amid Claims Of Anti-Catholic Bias.

The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=091-d71&t=c>
(5/3, Kane) reports Speaker Ryan “reversed course Thursday and agreed to
keep the Rev. Patrick J. Conroy on as House chaplain after an extraordinary
showdown that included the priest alleging anti-Catholic bias among Ryan’s
staff.” Ryan’s “decision capped a highly unusual dispute between the
Catholic speaker, who announced last month that he would retire so he could
spend time with his teenage children, and a Jesuit priest who has spent
seven years serving as the spiritual adviser to 435 lawmakers and thousands
of congressional staff.”

        USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=092-ba9&t=c>
(5/3, Shesgreen) reports that earlier Thursday, “in a remarkable two-page
letter
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=093-2e9&t=c>
to Ryan, Conroy disputed the speaker’s public explanation for removing him
and said he wanted to retract the resignation letter he submitted at Ryan’s
direction last month.” Wrote Conroy, “I have never been disciplined, nor
reprimanded, nor have I ever heard a complaint about my ministry during my
time as House chaplain. ... It is my desire to continue to serve as House
chaplain in this 115th United States Congress and beyond.” CNN
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=094-0cd&t=c>
(5/3, Diaz, Fox) notes that in his letter, Conroy “addressed speculation
that lawmakers wanted a chaplain who wasn’t Catholic.” Wrote Conroy, “While
you never spoke with me in person, nor did you send me any correspondence,
on Friday, April 13, 2018 your Chief of Staff, Jonathon Burks, came to me
and informed me that you were asking for my letter of resignation. ... I
inquired as to whether or not it was ‘for cause,’ and Mr. Burks mentioned
dismissively something like, ‘maybe it’s time that we had a Chaplain that
wasn’t a Catholic.’” The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=095-5c5&t=c>
(5/3, Taylor) notes “Conroy also wrote that Burks mentioned a November
prayer regarding the GOP tax bill that upset many Republicans.” Conroy
“prayed for lawmakers to make sure that ‘there are not winners and losers
under new tax laws, but benefits balanced and shared by all
Americans.’” [image:
Image removed by sender. Video]NBC Nightly News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=096-34b&t=c>
(5/3, story 2, 2:05, Holt) showed Conroy saying, “There are efforts these
days guarantee that there are not winners and losers under new tax laws,
but benefits, balanced and shared by all.”

        ABC World News Tonight
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=097-267&t=c>
(5/3, story 9, 0:20, Muir) and the CBS
Evening News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=098-5bd&t=c>
(5/3, story 11, 0:25, Glor) briefly mentioned the story last night, while The
Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=099-f8c&t=c>
(5/3, Lillis, Thomsen) reported that “the controversy deepened when Rep.
Mark Walker (R-NC), a Baptist minister who heads the Republican Study
Committee,” reportedly “suggested the House chaplain should have a wife and
kids in order to relate better to the needs of lawmakers – a stipulation
that would exclude Catholics like Conroy, who take an oath of celibacy.”
The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=09a-346&t=c>
(5/3, Kane) notes “Conroy is just the second Catholic priest to serve as
chaplain, but those two priests have held the position since 2000.”

        The Washington Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=09b-6b4&t=c>
(5/3, Ferrechio) reports “Ryan backed down,” and Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=09c-c60&t=c>
(5/3, Caygle) that he said in a statement, “My original decision was made
in what I believed to be the best interest of this institution. ... To be
clear, that decision was based on my duty to ensure that the House has the
kind of pastoral services that it deserves.” Ryan also “said he plans to
meet with Conroy next week ‘so that we can move forward for the good of the
whole House.’” The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=09d-a93&t=c>
(5/3, Taylor) notes that “Ryan did not directly address Conroy’s explosive
charge.” Burks, “in a statement released by Ryan’s office, said ‘I strongly
disagree with Father Conroy’s recollection of our conversation.’”

        The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=09e-a1f&t=c>
(5/3, Stolberg, Dias) reports that “after Mr. Ryan reversed course, the
chaplain accepted some responsibility in the debacle,” saying, “We both
acknowledged that we need to talk about how I can improve my performance so
the chaplaincy operates for as many members as possible. ... I don’t know
any pastor or any chaplain anywhere that doesn’t have some detractors. That
is the human condition. My problem is I was never told that that was the
case.” The Times adds “at least one Catholic Republican welcomed the news.”
Said Rep. Peter King, “This should never have happened. He’s a good man,
he’s a good chaplain and if they want to make a change, this is not the way
to do it. ... He deserved better and now he’s gotten better.”
Investigation Finds More Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Charlie Rose.

On its front page, the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=09f-c26&t=c>
(5/3, A1, Brittain, Carmon) reports a new investigation by the Washington
Post, “incidents of sexual misconduct by Charlie Rose were far more
numerous than previously known,” with an additional 27 women saying that
Rose sexually harassed them, with allegations dating to 1976. The Post also
found that three times in three decades “CBS managers were warned of his
conduct toward women at the network.” [image: Image removed by sender.
Video]ABC World News Tonight
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0a0-739&t=c>
(5/3, story 8, 0:25, Muir) reported on the Washington Post article. Rose
responded, saying, “Your story is unfair and inaccurate.” Bianna Golodryga,
on the CBS Evening News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0a1-994&t=c>
(5/3, story 7, 2:40, Glor), also reported on the Post article. She said,
“Today’s allegations in the Post include groping, indecent exposure, and
initiating inappropriate sexual conversations while Rose was at programs,
including CBS’ ‘Night Watch,’ ‘60 Minutes II,’ and ‘60 Minutes,’ as well as
‘CBS This Morning.’” She added, “CBS News says there were no formal
complaints filed with human resources against Rose before he was
fired.” [image:
Image removed by sender. Video]NBC Nightly News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0a2-ad2&t=c>
(5/3, story 6, 2:10, Holt) also covered the Post’s report.
Cancer Research
Tennessee Governor Vetoes Alternative Cancer Treatment Bill.

The Tennessean
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0a3-a0d&t=c>
(5/3, Ebert) reports that Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam (R) vetoed a bill
Thursday that would have required insurance coverage of proton therapy for
state employees. In a statement, Haslam said the legislation “circumvents”
an established process for determining employee insurance coverage.
Univ. Of Oklahoma Collecting Patients’ Tumor DNA For Nationwide Database.

The Oklahoman
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0a4-10d&t=c>
(5/3, Wingerter) reports the University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer
Center is receiving contributions of genetic information from patients’
tumors as part of a nationwide database compilation effort “in the hope of
finding better treatments for themselves or advancing knowledge about
cancer.” The Oncology Research Information Exchange Network “will allow
doctors to test their patients’ tumors for a broader range of mutations” in
a broader push toward applying precision medicine to cancer treatment.
Editorials/Op-Eds
New York Times.

*“What Keeps American Troops In the Yemen War?”* The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0a5-a72&t=c>
(5/3) editorializes that the Pentagon and the Administration “apparently
have misled Americans about growing military involvement in a war in Yemen
that we should have nothing to do with.” The Times argues that “such
significant military decisions require public debate to force presidents
and their generals to justify their decisions and be held accountable for
the consequences.” It goes on to call on Congress to cut off military aid
to Saudi Arabia and vote “to bar the use of American troops against the
Houthis in Yemen.”

        *“When The Republicans Are Honest About Their Policies.” *In an
editorial headlined “When Republicans Are Honest About Their Policies,” the New
York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0a6-9f1&t=c>
(5/3) highlights Sen. Marco Rubio’s recent comment that there is “no
evidence whatsoever” that in the wake of the 2017 tax cut, business’
savings have “been massively poured back into the American worker.” The
Times also highlights ex-HHS Secretary Tom Price’s admission that
“Congress’s decision to eliminate the health insurance mandate that ‘drives
up the cost’ of insurance.” The Times writes, “With their recent comments,
Mr. Rubio and Mr. Price unwittingly highlighted the yawning gap between
what Republicans say they want to achieve and what their proposals actually
do.”

        *“Should The European Sanction Illegally.” *In an editorial, the New
York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0a7-79a&t=c>
(5/3) writes that new European Union members in Central Europe “blatantly
flouting” Western democratic values is “a matter of obvious irritation and
concern to older members.” The Times adds it is “tempting” to embrace a
proposed plan to linking EU aid to “an independent judiciary as a
prerequisite for sound financial management,” but this is “not a very good
idea,” as “financial sanctions have a poor track record in altering regime
behavior.” Such a move “would inevitably reinforce the sense among many in
the former Soviet bloc countries of being second-class citizens” and
strengthen the current regimes’ rules. The Times argues the EU needs to
persuades “citizens of the new members that their rights, dignity and
status as full-fledged fellow Europeans are being trampled when populist
demagogues curtail their freedoms or the rule of law.”
Washington Post.

*“A Defense Of The Rule Of Law.”* In an editorial, the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0a8-cee&t=c>
(5/3) writes on “what a more presidential president might say” if they had
“respect for the rule of law”: that sensitive details of ongoing Justice
Department investigations “must be kept secret, even from – especially from
– political leaders.” The Post adds that such a president would also say,
“This principle of independent, apolitical law enforcement is what
distinguishes us from a banana republic, where police powers are wielded to
benefit or punish one party or another.”

        *“How Would We Answer Today?” *In an editorial, the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0a9-1c6&t=c>
(5/3) writes that the a new special exhibition at the US Holocaust Memorial
Museum, “Americans and the Holocaust,” is “one of the most important since
the museum opened,” raising “disturbing and complex questions about the
years leading up to the” Holocaust and with answers that “resonate today.”
The exhibit makes clear that Americans were aware of the Nazi persecution
of the Jews but did not allow more to emigrate to the country. While now
“we have vastly improved tools to discover violence against a whole
people,” the Post concludes, “our response mechanism has not improved along
with our technology.”

        *“What’s Wrong With The FAA Bill.” *In an editorial, the Washington
Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0aa-1fe&t=c>
(5/3, Board) writes that it is “depressing” that the generally “welcome”
bill reauthorizing the Federal Aviation Administration does not contain “a
plan for fundamental reform of the air traffic control system.” Shifting
air traffic control from the FAA to a government-owned air traffic control
corporation supported by user fees and governed by stakeholders would allow
“much-needed technological modernization” and “let the FAA focus
exclusively on its safety regulation mission.” The Post attributes the lack
of such a plan to the actions of “the corporate-jet and private-plane
lobbies,” concluding, “Score one for the swamp.”
Biden in the News
Michigan 2020 Poll: Biden Leads Trump 52%-39%.

WLNS-TV
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0ab-c37&t=c>
Lansing, MI (5/3) reported, “A new poll of Michigan voters shows former
vice president Joe Biden leading President Donald Trump in a hypothetical
head-to-head race for the White House. The EPIC-MRA poll asked people, if
the election were held today, who would they vote for? Thirty-nine percent
said they would go for President Trump. Fifty-two percent said they’d cast
their vote for Biden. That split is mostly due to the fact that most
independents who were polled sided with the Democrat.”

*Copyright 2018 by Bulletin Intelligence LLC* Reproduction or
redistribution without permission prohibited. Content is drawn from
thousands of newspapers, national magazines, national and local television
programs, radio broadcasts, social-media platforms and additional forms of
open-source data. Sources for Bulletin Intelligence audience-size estimates
include Scarborough, GfK MRI, comScore, Nielsen, and the Audit Bureau of
Circulation. Data from and access to third party social media platforms,
including but not limited to Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and others, is
subject to the respective platform’s terms of use. Services that include
Factiva content are governed by Factiva’s terms of use
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0ac-f70&t=c>.
Services including embedded Tweets are also subject to Twitter for
Website's information and privacy policies
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018050401biden&r=email-42d8&l=0ad-123&t=c>.
The Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing is published five
days a week by Bulletin Intelligence, which creates custom briefings for
government and corporate leaders. We can be found on the Web at
BulletinIntelligence.com, or called at (703) 483-6100