Subject: FW: Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Tuesday, June 19, 2018
From: "Kathy Chung" <[email-masked]>
To: "Ashley Blazer Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Jill Tracy Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Jimmy Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Valerie Biden Owens" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:25:16 -0400

Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing

*From:* Bulletin Intelligence <[email-masked]>
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 19, 2018 7:53 AM
*To:* [email-masked]
*Subject:* Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for
Tuesday, June 19, 2018

*Click to access
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=000-c17&t=c>
mobile-optimized online version, including download options and an audio
reader.*

[image: Image removed by sender. Office of Vice President Biden
Intelligence Briefing]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=001-2b0&t=c>

*To: Vice President Joe Biden*

*Tuesday, June 19, 2018 8:00 AM EDT*
Today's Table of Contents

*Biden in the News <#SECTION_1>*

• Biden Endorses Sen. Smith In Minnesota Special Election. <#S1>

• Brower: Biden Initially Had Difficulty Adjusting To Role Of Vice
President. <#S2>

• Memphis Newspaper Recounts Biden’s Friday Appearance. <#S3>

• Biden Cancer Initiative Accepting Nominations For “FIERCE” Awards. <#S4>

• Brad Bannon: Warren “In A Unique Position To Win” 2020 Democratic Nod.
<#S5>

*Leading the News <#SECTION_2>*

• Trump, Officials Defend “Zero Tolerance” Border Policy Amid Bipartisan
Criticism. <#S6>

*Foreign Policy <#SECTION_3>*

• Trump: US May Impose Tariffs On Another $200 Billion Worth Of Chinese
Goods. <#S7>

• China Objects To New “De Facto US Embassy” In Taiwan. <#S8>

• Seoul: Pompeo To Meet “Soon” With North Korean Officials. <#S9>

• Trump: Germans “Turning Against Their Leadership” On Migration As
Violence Rises. <#S10>

• Pompeo Discusses Syria, North Korea With Lavrov. <#S11>

• Netanyahu Holds Talks On Jerusalem With Jordan’s King Abdullah. <#S12>

• House Of Lords Rejects May’s Brexit Proposal. <#S13>

*Domestic Policy <#SECTION_4>*

• Media Analyses: Trump Move To Create Space Force Likely To Face
Resistance In Congress. <#S14>

• Horowitz, Wray Testify Before Senate About Clinton Probe IG Report. <#S15>

• Acosta: Association Plans Will Help Blunt Small Business Healthcare Costs.
<#S16>

• Trump Nominates Kraninger To Head CFPB. <#S17>

• Supreme Court Rulings Sidestep Decision On Partisan Gerrymandering. <#S18>

• NYTimes: Trump Undermining Growing Industries To Help Steel, Coal. <#S19>

• Civil Rights Groups Urge NFL To Reverse National Anthem Rule. <#S20>

*Cancer Research <#SECTION_5>*

• Johns Hopkins Biotech Spinoff Secures $32.5M For Immunotherapy Treatment
Trial. <#S21>

• Researchers: All Women Should Be Evaluated For Breast Cancer Risk By Age
30. <#S22>

*Editorials/Op-Eds <#SECTION_6>*

• New York Times. <#S23>

• Washington Post. <#S24>
Biden in the News
Biden Endorses Sen. Smith In Minnesota Special Election.

KSTP-TV
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=002-22c&t=c>
Minneapolis-St.Paul, MN (6/18) reported that former Vice President Joe
Biden on Monday “endorsed Democrat Tina Smith for the US Senate seat. Smith
has held the seat since Al Franken’s resignation at the start of the year.”
Smith, who was appointed to the seat by Gov. Mark Dayton (D), is running in
this fall’s special election to for the remainder of Franken’s term.
Brower: Biden Initially Had Difficulty Adjusting To Role Of Vice President.

Kate Andersen Brower, author of a new book on vice presidents titled “First
In Line,” was asked during a Monday appearance on WGN-TV[image: Image
removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=003-1af&t=c>
Chicago's Midday News (6/18) to reveal “something that we might not about
the relationship between Obama and Joe Biden.” Brower responded that the
relationship “wasn’t as easy as people think it was. That it was hard at
the beginning. It took Biden a lot of time to really work for somebody.
He’d been in the Senate for 40 years, almost. And he’d never had a boss
before.”
Memphis Newspaper Recounts Biden’s Friday Appearance.

Under the headline “Biden’s Message Boiled Down To This: Be The Change You
Seek,” the Memphis (TN) Tri-State Defender
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=004-034&t=c>
(6/18, Semien) reported on former Vice President Joe Biden’s Friday visit
to Memphis, where he spoke about topics revolving “around his new book,
‘Promise Me Dad: A Year of Hope, and Purpose.” Biden spoke “about his
commitment to civil rights, making American better and his life in and out
of public office. Biden’s son, Beau, died of a brain tumor in May 2015.
‘Maybe the book is about his insistence that I do my job and my desire to
be with him,’ Biden said reflectively.” The Defender also said that Biden
praised Millennials and urged them to engage in politics.
Biden Cancer Initiative Accepting Nominations For “FIERCE” Awards.

Becker’s Hospital Review
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=005-1e4&t=c>
(6/18, Rappleye) reported that the Biden Cancer Initiative “is seeking
nominations for its FIERCE Award to recognize the ‘unsung heroes’ of cancer
care.” Dr. Jill Biden is quoted as saying in a video announcing the award,
“One thing my family and I have learned is the cancer journey is full of
exceptional people doing incredible things. Sometimes it’s the smallest
kindness that can make the biggest difference. At the Biden Cancer
Initiative, we created the FIERCE Award to celebrate the people and
organizations that inspire us to be fierce, that help patients thrive, that
make hope real.” The article added, “Individuals or organizations can be
nominated through July 31 in one of five categories: prevention and early
detection, reducing cancer disparities, patient navigation, survivorship,
and leadership through exemplary and awesome purpose.”
Brad Bannon: Warren “In A Unique Position To Win” 2020 Democratic Nod.

In an op-ed for The Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=006-93b&t=c>
(6/18), Democratic pollster Brad Bannon wrote about Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s
(D) potential 2020 presidential prospects, saying that “the 2020 Democratic
nominee needs to mend the fences between the Sanders and establishment
Democrats and then bridge the wide gap between minority voters and white
voters who are both struggling to make ends meet financially.” Bannon
listed Warren, former Vice President Joe Biden, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I)
as “three frontrunners” in the 2020 Democratic race, but argued that Warren
“is in a unique position to win the nomination. Sanders is not acceptable
to the establishment wing of the party and the Sanders wing will have
problems with Biden.” Bannon said Warren “could bridge the gap between the
two camps,” because she “supported Clinton and unlike Sanders is an ardent
Democrat.”
Leading the News
Trump, Officials Defend “Zero Tolerance” Border Policy Amid Bipartisan
Criticism.

President Trump, DHS Secretary Nielsen and Attorney General Sessions all
offered unequivocal defenses of the Administration’s “zero tolerance”
border security policy on Monday. Their comments receive heavy coverage in
print and online this morning and on Monday’s network news broadcasts, all
of which led with the story. The coverage is decidedly negative for the
Administration, with many reports asserting Trump’s claim that Democrats
are responsible for the separation of immigrant children from their parents
is false and highlighting that prominent Republicans are joining with
Democrats in denouncing the Administration.

        The Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=007-598&t=c>
(6/18, Fabian) reports that although Trump “is facing mounting pressure to
change the policy,” he “doubled down on the controversial policy”
yesterday. In the lead story for ABC World News Tonight[image: Image
removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=008-8c5&t=c>
(6/18, lead story, 4:05), David Muir also said Trump is “doubling down on
his zero tolerance policy.” The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=009-cea&t=c>
(6/18, A1, Rogers, Sullivan) reports that in “a series of tweets and
speeches on Monday,” Trump “relied on fear to curry support” for the
policy. In one tweet
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=00a-4af&t=c>,
Trump wrote, “Children are being used by some of the worst criminals on
earth as a means to enter our country. Has anyone been looking at the Crime
taking place south of the border. It is historic, with some countries the
most dangerous places in the world. Not going to happen in the U.S.” Trump
also “repeated his running blame of Democratic policies...despite the fact
that no law requires families to necessarily be separated at the border.”

        Trump tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=00b-3da&t=c>,
“Why don’t the Democrats give us the votes to fix the world’s worst
immigration laws? Where is the outcry for the killings and crime being
caused by gangs and thugs, including MS-13, coming into our country
illegally?” He followed that with another tweet
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=00c-ed8&t=c>
saying, “CHANGE THE LAWS!” A few minutes later, he tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=00d-5ab&t=c>,
“It is the Democrats fault for being weak and ineffective with Boarder
Security and Crime. Tell them to start thinking about the people devastated
by Crime coming from illegal immigration. Change the laws!”

        Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=00e-e09&t=c>
(6/18, Lambert) says Trump “responded sharply to critics,” saying at a
White House event, “The United States will not be a migrant camp, and it
will not be a refugee holding facility. It won’t be. You look at what’s
happening in Europe, you look at what’s happening in other places – we
can’t allow that to happen to the United States, not on my watch.” Breitbart
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=00f-f36&t=c>
(6/18, Spiering) says Trump “chastised Democrats for grandstanding on the
issue of immigration instead of working with Republicans to fix the
problems.” Trump said, “If the Democrats would sit down instead of
obstructing, we could have something done very quickly. ... Good for the
children, good for the country, good for the world.” The Los Angeles Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=010-d14&t=c>
(6/18, Stokols) reports that amid a “growing backlash,” Trump “stood firm”
to the “hard-line stance on immigration [that] is in keeping with the
promises that defined and helped propel his unlikely bid for the presidency
from the start three years ago.” The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=011-bdc&t=c>
(6/18, Miller) describes Trump as “undaunted and unapologetic” as he
“defended his administration’s border-protection policies Monday in the
face of rising national outrage.”

        However, Kristin Welker said on NBC Nightly News[image: Image
removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=012-17a&t=c>
(6/18, story 2, 2:30, Holt) that Trump could “end this crisis with a phone
call.” Sessions “announced the zero-tolerance policy in April. The
Administration could reverse it just as quickly. But for his part, the
President is trying to put the blame on Democrats.” Under the headline,
“Trump Falsely Blames Democrats While DHS Chief Defends Family
Separation,” Bloomberg
News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=013-1af&t=c>
(6/18, Epstein) says that while Trump “blamed Democrats’ opposition to
legislation that would curb legal immigration for his administration’s
policy of separating child migrants from their parents,” there is “no law
requiring children to be taken from parents apprehended after unlawfully
crossing the border.”

        The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=014-4c1&t=c>
(6/18, Wagner) says Trump “doubled down...on his false insistence that
Democrats are to blame for the administration’s forced separation of
migrant children from their families.” Major Garrett said on the CBS
Evening News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=015-03e&t=c>
(6/18, story 3, 3:15, Glor) that Trump “blamed Congressional Democrats
again today for his Administration’s family’s separation policy,” but “it
was the Administration that instituted the so-called ‘zero tolerance’
policy of prosecuting any adult who crosses the border illegally and then
separate them from their children or accompanied minors.” Cecilia Vega said
on ABC World News Tonight
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=016-f54&t=c>
(6/18, story 2, 3:40, Muir) that Trump “could be the one to end it. It is
his policy launched by his Administration.”

        Philip Bump writes in an analysis for the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=017-c1d&t=c>
(6/18) that while Trump said he would speak “very honestly” and “straight,”
what “followed wasn’t.” His remarks were “about deflecting blame for an
unpopular policy while reinforcing his long-standing political rhetoric, an
effort that at times was internally contradictory. It was not said very
honestly or said particularly straight.”

        Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=018-9be&t=c>
(6/18, Nelson) says Administration officials “are refusing to publicly back
down from their intensely controversial practice of separating migrant
families at the border,” and USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=019-33a&t=c>
(6/18, Bacon) reports that Trump, Sessions, and Nielsen “staunchly
defended” the “‘zero tolerance’ immigration policy...amid growing outrage
over the separation of children from parents accused of illegally
attempting to enter the country.”

        The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=01a-fb0&t=c>
(6/18, Miroff) reports that in a speech at the National Sheriff’s
Association meeting in New Orleans Monday, Nielsen “pushed back...at the
growing condemnation of her agency’s practice of separating migrant
families at the border,” telling the group, “This department will no longer
stand by and watch you attack law enforcement for enforcing the laws passed
by Congress. ... We will not apologize for the job we do, or the job law
enforcement does, or the job the American people expect us to do.” USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=01b-9c2&t=c>
(6/18, Bacon) reports that Nielsen “said the children are provided food,
medical attention, education and anything else they might need.”

        The Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=01c-c9c&t=c>
(6/18, Fabian) reports that Nielsen also made a “surprise appearance in the
White House briefing room” on Monday, where she “offered a combative
defense of the Trump administration’s controversial policy.” Nielsen said,
“This entire crisis, just to be clear, is not new.” Nielsen said,
“Currently, it is the exclusive product of loopholes in our federal
immigration laws that prevent illegal immigrant minors and family members
from being detained and removed to their home countries. ... Congress and
the courts created this system, and Congress alone can fix it.” The Washington
Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=01d-5d9&t=c>
(6/18, Giaritelli) reports that Nielsen told reporters that the separation
of families also occurred during the Obama Administration. Nielsen said,
“The Obama administration, the Bush administration all separated families.
They absolutely did. Their rate was less than ours but they absolutely did
do this. This is not new.” However, Aaron Blake of the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=01e-39c&t=c>
(6/18, Blake) writes, “Behind the scenes, Nielsen is reportedly fighting
Trump’s decision to separate migrant children from parents.”

        Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=01f-6e4&t=c>
(6/18, Morin) says Nielsen’s comments came after she drew criticism for
saying in a tweet that her Department does “not have a policy of separating
families at the border. Period.” Politico adds that although DHS “may not
have explicit rules on family separations, the practice is a direct
outgrowth of the Trump administration’s ‘zero-tolerance’ policy.” The New
York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=020-6dc&t=c>
(6/18, Qiu) reports that Nielsen “suggested in two appearances on Monday
that the Trump administration policy to separate children from their
parents at the border was justified, in part, to prevent smugglers from
posing as families to take advantage of a ‘get-out-of-jail-free card.’”
However, “characterizing the increase of this type of fraud as ‘staggering’
is misleading. The data reflects a period of less than two years, making it
difficult to draw a meaningful historical comparison. And the instances of
fraud make up less than 1 percent of families apprehended at the border.”

        The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=021-06b&t=c>
(6/18, Boyer) reports that as Nielsen “was defending the administration’s
policy of separating families who enter the country illegally,” a
journalist on the White House briefing room “played an audio tape of crying
illegal immigrant children.” The sound, which “went on for more than 30
seconds,” was from a recording “of 10 Central American children, separated
from their parents one day last week by US immigration authorities at the
border.” It “went viral earlier in the day.” The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=022-bce&t=c>
(6/18, Fausset) says the recording “is one of a number of documents and
accounts that have emerged in recent days showing the toll the practice is
taking on children, even though government officials have forbidden
journalists who tour the detention centers for migrant children from using
cameras or conducting interviews with the children.” The Times says it
“added disturbing and intimate notes to the debate over the Trump
administration’s practice of separating children from their parents when
families are detained at the border.”

        The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=023-24f&t=c>
(6/18, A1, Radnofsky, Andrews) reports that Sessions told the sheriffs’
meeting in New Orleans that the intent of the policy is to end “the
lawlessness” at the southern US border, and he offered suggestions on how
the current policy could be ended. Sessions said, “If we build the wall, if
we pass some legislation, we close some loopholes, we won’t face these
terrible choices.” CBS News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=024-813&t=c>
(6/18) reports that Sessions “blamed previous administrations for allowing
‘loopholes’ that led to immigrants crossing the border illegally with
children, effectively given them immunity from prosecution.” Said Sessions,
“Word got out about this loophole with predictable results. The number of
aliens illegally crossing with children between our ports of entry went
from 14,000 to 75,000 – that’s a 5-fold increase – in just the last 4
years. This cannot continue.”

        Sessions said on Fox News’ The Ingraham Angle[image: Image removed
by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=025-dd5&t=c>
(6/18), “We have watched what happened with the Obama policies, and over
the years, we went from 15,000 illegal entries to 75,000. This is a huge
loophole in our system that’s attracting more and more people as more and
more people understand that under previous policies, if they were entering
the country unlawfully, nothing ever happened. But we are doing the right
thing. We are taking care of these children. They are not being abused.
Health and Human Services house them in good conditions.”

        White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short said on CNN’s
Situation Room
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=026-193&t=c>
(6/18), “There’s a lot of misinformation about this. In 1997, there was a
decision between INS and HHS that says children of immigrants coming here
illegally need to be handed over to HHS. In 2008 that was signed by
President Bush. The law says they are to be handed over to HHS within 48
hours. The 9th Circuit determined a reasonable at of time they can be in
detention is up to 20 days. ... The choice is binary, to separate the
children or instead within 20 days to let the parents and children go free
into society with the expectation they show up for court.” Short continued,
“separating parents from children is not a policy that we want to pursue.
At the same time, letting children and parents come across the border
unbounded, illegally, is not a policy either. We want a solution.”

        In a heated interview on CNN’s Cuomo Prime Time[image: Image
removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=027-a51&t=c>
(6/18), presidential counselor Kellyanne Conway said, “I’m a Catholic, I’m
a mother, I have a conscience. I stand with the President, the First Lady
and everyone else who has said many different ways that nobody likes this
result. At the same time, you have to recognize what the Secretary of
Homeland Security said today: We have a 1,700 percent increase in asylum
claims.” The rest of Conway’s interview on this issue can be seen here[image:
Image removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=028-e04&t=c>.

        In the lead story for NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by
sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=029-627&t=c>
(6/18, lead story, 5:40), Lester Holt described the Administration as being
“on the defensive” over the “policy...that is the object of a growing
bipartisan outcry.” The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=02a-f26&t=c>
(6/18) says congressional Republicans “beat a full-scale retreat” from the
Administration’s “zero-tolerance border policy, joining Democrats to demand
that President Trump stop jailing parents and find ways to keep families
together while trying to stop a new surge of illegal immigration.” Rep.
Will Hurd (R) said on CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360[image: Image removed by
sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=02b-584&t=c>
(6/18) that “it is very clear that it is within the Department of Justice,
it is within DHS’s ability to not separate kids from their parents. And so
acting as if this is something that Congress is preventing from happening
is just incorrect and it is something that this Administration could change
right away.”

        The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=02c-206&t=c>
(6/18, Wagner) reports Jeb Bush “chided” Trump “for pursuing a ‘heartless
policy’ of forced separation of migrant children from their families.” On
Twitter, Bush “also accused Trump of trying to use the plight of the
migrant children as ‘a negotiating tool’ to advance his own priorities on
immigration with Congress, echoing a criticism leveled by many Democrats in
recent days,” according to the Post. Breitbart
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=02d-44e&t=c>
(6/18, Caplan) reports that Ohio Gov. John Kasich “sent out a fundraising
email Monday, seeking political contributions in response to the growing
controversy surrounding the Trump administration’s handling of underage
illegal border crossers.” According to Breitbart, the email reads,
“Separating children from their parents is just wrong. Take action now.
Make your voice heard today.”

        Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D) said on CNN’s Situation Room[image:
Image removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=02e-132&t=c>
(6/18) that the Administration’s “policy” is “hold[ing] these children
hostage. They are used as pawns.” Blumenthal added that it “is so betraying
American values. It recalls the worst period in American history during
World War II when we put people of Japanese descent into separate
encampments and separated them from the communities and in other times in
our world history when families have been torn apart as is happening right
now.” Blumenthal also called it “child abuse, plain and simple.”

        Sean Hannity said on Fox News’ Hannity[image: Image removed by
sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=02f-a7f&t=c>
(6/18), “No one likes the idea of separating any child from any parent. But
this issue has been in the hands of Congress. And right now the whole issue
can be fixed. Every law can be changed, and if they did their job, it would
happen.”

        A New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=030-694&t=c>
(6/18) editorial says that watching Trump “blame Democrats for his
administration’s inhumane practice of snatching immigrant children from
their parents at the border evokes nothing so much as an abusive husband
blaming his wife for the beatings he delivers.” The Times calls the
practice “immoral” and says lawmakers “should not negotiate with the
president until he puts a stop to this ‘zero tolerance’ insanity.”

        In an editorial, the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=031-2b7&t=c>
(6/18) says no one in the Administration has tried to “justify breaking up
families” because “there is nothing that can justify” the policy. Richard
Cohen writes in the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=032-1ba&t=c>
(6/18), “The outcry against the policy is such that it cannot last.” In an
op-ed for the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=033-ce6&t=c>
(6/18), former DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson writes that the “current ‘zero
tolerance’ deterrent policy, resulting in the separation of 2,000 innocent
migrant children from their parents, is immoral and un-American,” and will,
“in the long run prove to be ineffective.”

        *Polls Show Find Strong Opposition To Separating Children From
Parents. *The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=034-b96&t=c>
(6/18, Bump) reports that a new Quinnipiac University poll
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=035-df1&t=c>
of 905 voters nationwide, conducted June 14-17, “shows that the policy [of
separating children from their parents] is...unpopular among Americans –
with one big exception.” According to the poll, “Two-thirds of the country,
66 percent, oppose Trump’s policy...includ[ing] 6 in 10 men and 7 in 10
women.” However, “a majority of Republicans approve of the policy, while 6
in 10 independents and 9 in 10 Democrats oppose it.” The Post says “the net
view of the policy overall is minus-39, with Republicans at plus-20 – 20
percentage points more likely to support it than to oppose. Among
independents, the net margin is minus-44.” Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=036-de9&t=c>
(6/18, Morin) also reports on the Quinnipiac poll.

        Jeff Glor reported in the lead story for the CBS Evening News[image:
Image removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=037-bd9&t=c>
(6/18, lead story, 4:55) that a new CBS News poll
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=038-35b&t=c>
of 1,100 adults nationwide, conducted July 14-17, found that “67 percent of
Americans call separating children from parents unacceptable. That includes
90 percent of Democrats. Republicans are split on the issue. Thirty-nine
percent find it unacceptable. Thirty-six percent acceptable.”

        CNN
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=039-60e&t=c>
(6/18, Sparks) reports on its website that a new CNN poll
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=03a-7ef&t=c>
of 1,012 “respondents” nationwide, conducted July 14-17 by SSRS, found that
“two-thirds of Americans disapprove of the Trump administration’s practice
of taking undocumented immigrant children from their families and putting
them in government facilities on US borders,” while “only 28% approve.”
Among Republicans, however, “there is majority support for the policy that
has resulted in an uptick of children being separated from their families.”

        *Republican Senators Working On Legislation To Halt Family
Separations. *Breitbart
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=03b-cf8&t=c>
(6/18, Caplan) reports Sen. Ben Sasse wrote on Facebook, “Changing from
catch-and-release does not require adopting the wicked family separation
policy.” According to Breitbart, Sasse said he is “working with Senator
James Lankford to address the ‘human tragedy at the border.’” The Washington
Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=03c-232&t=c>
(6/18, Dinan) reports that Sen. Ted Cruz announced a bill Monday “to stop
family separations at the border, calling for a massive infusion of money
and manpower to solve the problem without going back to the days of
catch-and-release.” While Cruz said “he is appalled by the images from the
border showing befuddled children being taken from their parents,” he
“rejected Democrats’ answer of releasing the illegal immigrant families,
saying that would create a loophole more migrants would try to exploit by
arriving as families.”

        *Sarah Sanders Pushes Back Against Laura Bush’s Criticism. *The Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=03d-f78&t=c>
(6/18, Samuels) reports that the Administration “pushed back against
criticism from former first lady Laura Bush of its ‘zero tolerance’
policy.” White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said during Monday’s
press briefing, “Frankly, this law was actually signed into effect in 2008
under (Laura Bush’s) husband’s leadership, not under this administration.
... We’re not the ones responsible for creating this problem. We’ve
inherited it. ... But we’re actually the first administration stepping up
and trying to fix it.” Sanders’ comments come after Bush wrote in an op-ed
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=03e-8fa&t=c>
for the Washington Post “in which she lambasted” the Administration’s
policy, calling it “cruel” and “immoral.” The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=03f-2ec&t=c>
(6/18) reports that former First Lady Michelle Obama on Monday re-tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=040-94d&t=c>
a message from Bush promoting the column, adding, “Sometimes truth
transcends party.”

        *Clinton: Separating Families Is “Horrific.” *Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=041-dca&t=c>
(6/18, Kinery) reports that at an event hosted by the Women’s Forum in
Manhattan Monday, Hillary Clinton “called the practice of separating
immigrant families at the U.S. border a ‘moral and humanitarian crisis’ and
criticized her 2016 election opponent for allowing it.” Clinton said,
“What’s happening to families at the border is horrific. ... Every human
being with a sense of compassion and decency should be outraged.” Clinton
also “criticized Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s citation of the Bible in
his defense of the policy,” saying, “What is being done using the name of
religion is contrary to everything I was ever taught.” The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=042-cfd&t=c>
(6/18, Hajela) reports that Clinton “said she had warned during the
campaign that Trump’s hard-line immigration stance would result in family
separations.” Clinton said, “Now as we watch with broken hearts, that’s
exactly what’s happening.”

        In a story for the CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by sender.
Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=043-e6d&t=c>
(6/18, story 8, 2:05, Glor), Gayle King highlighted immigrants crossing the
southern border to escape violence in their home countries and, in another
story on the CBS Evening News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=044-9db&t=c>
(6/18, story 2, 2:00, Glor), Mireya Villarreal interviewed “Mexicans on the
other side of the border hoping to make it to America.”

        *UN Human Rights Commissioner Calls Trump Policy “Unconscionable.” *The
New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=045-bba&t=c>
(6/18, Cumming-Bruce) and the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=046-723&t=c>
(6/18, Morello) both report that Jordanian Prince Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein,
the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, condemned the Administration,
saying, “The thought that any state would seek to deter parents by
inflicting such abuse on children is unconscionable.”

        *Administration Could Be Holding 30,000 Children By August. *In a
story that was the lead on Drudge Report Monday evening, the Washington
Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=047-f3d&t=c>
(6/18, Giaritelli) reports that the Administration “could be holding 30,000
illegal immigrant children by the end of August as a result of its push to
enforce federal immigration laws.” The Examiner cites “a senior
administration official who asked not to be identified,” who said that HHS
“has been taking in about 250 children per day in recent weeks.” According
to an HHS official, the Department “expects to be taking about 250 kids
each day at least for the next two months,” which means it “could be caring
for 18,500 more children by the end of August. The HHS official said as of
Friday, HHS was already holding 11,500 children, which means the total
could hit 30,000 by August.”

        *Report: Administration Discussed Separating Mothers, Children In
February 2017. *Citing “notes from a closed-door DHS meeting,” NBC News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=048-a48&t=c>
(6/18, Ainsley) reports on its website that “the idea of separating migrant
children from their mothers was discussed during the earliest days of the
Trump administration as a way to deter asylum-seekers.” According to notes
from a town hall held for Citizenship and Immigration Services asylum
officers on Feb. 2, 2017, “the agency’s asylum chief, John Lafferty, told
the officers they might have to ‘hold mothers longer’ and ‘hold children in
HHR/ORR.’” NBC adds that while the Administration “has repeatedly
maintained that the increasing number of children being separated from
their mothers at the US southern border is not a policy of its own making,”
in the town hall two weeks after Trump’s inauguration, “Lafferty laid out a
number of policies specifically intended to lower the number of immigrants
claiming asylum,” including “separation of parents and children.”

        *AP: Undocumented Immigrants, Including Children, Being Held In
“Cages.” *The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=049-727&t=c>
(6/18, Merchant) has a report from inside a facility in McAllen, Texas
where it says “hundreds of immigrant children wait in a series of cages
created by metal fencing.” According to the AP, “More than 1,100 people
were inside the large, dark facility that’s divided into separate wings for
unaccompanied children, adults on their own, and mothers and fathers with
children.” Breitbart
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=04a-3aa&t=c>
(6/18, Binder) says, “CBS News, Time Magazine, Business Insider, NBC News,
and their counterparts in the Democratic Party have continuously claimed
migrant children are being held in cages, specifically pointing to photos
from a detention facility in McAllen, Texas.” However, the same barriers
“were used in that McAllen detention facility under President Obama when
the establishment media was silent on the issue.”

        *Caged Boy In Viral Photo Was Not Detainee. *USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=04b-e98&t=c>
(6/18, Connor) reports that filmmaker and journalist Jose Antonio Varga
last week tweeted a “photo of a small child crying with his hands gripping
the side of a cage” with the caption, “This is what happens when a
government believes people are ‘illegal.’ Kids in cages.” The post “has
more than 24,000 retweets and 35,000 likes.” But, the photo “was actually
taken on June 10, 2018 at an event protesting the Trump administration’s
‘zero-tolerance’ policy. The boy is not a detainee.”

        *Trump Aides Planning To Intensify Immigration Crackdown Ahead Of
Midterms. *Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=04c-116&t=c>
(6/18, Cook) reports that “top aides” to Trump “are planning additional
crackdowns on immigration before the November midterms, despite a growing
backlash over the administration’s move to separate migrant children from
parents at the border.” According to Politico, “senior policy adviser
Stephen Miller and a team of officials from the Justice Department,
Department of Labor, Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of
Management and Budget” have been seeking “ways to use executive authority
and under-the-radar rule changes to strengthen hard-line U.S. immigration
policies,” with the goal of proving Trump “with enough data and statistics
by early September to show voters that he fulfilled his immigration
promises — even without a physical border wall or any other congressional
measure, said one Republican close to the White House.”

        The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=04d-9d0&t=c>
(6/18, Shear, Benner) says Sessions and Miller, who “spent years on the
political fringe in the nation’s capital as high-decibel immigration
hard-liners, always warning about the dangers of open borders but rarely in
a position to affect law or policy,” have “moved from the edges of the
immigration debate to its red-hot center. Powerful like never before, the
two are the driving force behind President Trump’s policy that has led
thousands of children to be separated from their parents at the nation’s
southern border.”

        *Schumer: Ryan Immigration Bill “Doomed To Fail.” *Breitbart
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=04e-a16&t=c>
(6/18, Munro) reports that Senate Minority Leader Schumer “says House
Speaker Paul Ryan’s amnesty bill is ‘doomed to fail’ because it cuts future
legal immigration into the United States.” Breitbart adds that Schumer’s
position on the measure “is critical because Ryan’s amnesty bill needs
support from roughly one-third of the 49 Democratic Senators – and also
needs support from nearly all GOP votes in the House.”

        *Mothers Of Children Killed By Undocumented Immigrants Blast Media
Hypocrisy. *The Daily Caller
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=04f-570&t=c>
(6/18, Caruso) reports that “the ‘Angel Moms’ of two American sons killed
by illegal aliens” said that “there was huge hypocrisy in the mainstream
media focusing on migrant parents instead of American parents who were
permanently separated from their children after those children were killed
by illegal aliens.”

        *Coulter: Crying Immigrant Children Are Actors. *The Washington
Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=050-208&t=c>
(6/18, Chasmar) reports that conservative author and pundit Ann Coulter
argued Sunday that the crying immigrant children seen on cable news
channels are “child actors” who are “given scripts to read by liberals.”
Coulter said on Fox News’ “The Next Revolution,” “I would also say one
other thing, these child actors weeping and crying on all the other
networks 24/7 right now: do not fall for it, Mr. President. I get very
nervous about the president getting his news from TV. ... A New Yorker
article – the New Yorker is not a conservative publication – they describe
how these kids, these kids are being coached. They’re given scripts to read
by liberals, according to the New Yorker. Don’t fall for the actor
children.” The Daily Beast
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=051-531&t=c>
(6/18, Wilstein) says The New Yorker article to which Coulter referred
“does not seem to exist, though some have speculated that Coulter may have
been referring to a New York Times article from May, which reported that
Trump administration officials claim migrant children have been ‘coached on
what to say to make fraudulent claims for asylum.’”

        *USCIS: DACA Status Granted To 53,000 Immigrants With Criminal
Records. *The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=052-32d&t=c>
(6/18, Dinan) reports that the US Citizenship and Immigration Services has
released data showing that “ten people who’d been arrested on murder
charges were nonetheless granted permission to remain and work in the US
under the Obama-era DACA amnesty.” In addition, “Thirty-one ‘Dreamers’ had
rape charges on their records, nearly 500 had been accused of sex crimes,
and more than 2,000 had been arrested for drunken driving – yet were
approved for DACA status.” The Times adds, “All told, 53,000 people who
have been approved for DACA – 7 percent of the total – had a criminal
record when the government granted them status,” and “nearly 8,000 racked
up criminal charges after they’d been approved.” Breitbart
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=053-9e4&t=c>
(6/18, Munro) reports that “17,079 DACA recipients have been arrested more
than two times.”

        *Krugman: Trump Turning US Into “Just Another Bully.” *In his New
York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=054-41e&t=c>
(6/18) column, Paul Krugman calls Trump “the worst human being ever to hold
his position,” and argues that he is overseeing “a systematic rejection of
longstanding American values – the values that actually made America
great.” Trump, Krugman writes, “isn’t making America great again; he’s
trashing the things that made us great, turning us into just another bully
– one whose bullying will be far less effective than he imagines.”

        *Greenberg: Trump’s Base Strategy Energizes Democrats, Alienates
Some Republicans. *In an op-ed for the New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=055-6b5&t=c>
(6/18), Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg writes that Trump’s
“outrageous, gutsy strategy of ginning up his base” brands the GOP “as
sexist, racist, xenophobic and anti-immigrant, which magnifies the
anti-Trump reaction among Democrats,” and “leaves a tenth who are
conservative Catholics and a fifth who are nonreligious conservatives more
tentative in their support of the Republican Party.” Moreover, “it pushes
away the quarter of Republicans who remain ideologically moderate. The
harder the president bangs these drums, the more Democrats become enraged
and a segment of Republicans gets demoralized.”
Foreign Policy
Trump: US May Impose Tariffs On Another $200 Billion Worth Of Chinese Goods.

The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=056-b4c&t=c>
(6/18, Rogers) reports President Trump “escalated his trade fight with
China” on Monday night, saying in a statement that his Administration would
identify “another $200 billion worth of Chinese goods that could face 10
percent tariffs.” Trump said that he had directed USTR Lighthizer to pursue
the additional tariffs in retaliation for Beijing’s decision last week to
place tariffs on $50 billion worth of American goods. Said the President,
“Further action must be taken to encourage China to change its unfair
practices, open its market to United States goods, and accept a more
balanced trade relationship with the United States. The trade relationship
between the United States and China must be much more equitable.” The Wall
Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=057-8ea&t=c>
(6/18, Mauldin) quotes Trump as saying, “If China increases its tariffs yet
again, we will meet that action by pursuing additional tariffs on another
$200 billion of goods.”

        The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=058-280&t=c>
(6/18, A1, Lynch, Long) says “such a step would be virtually unprecedented
in US history and would put nearly all of the $505 billion in products that
the United States imports from China under tariffs,” while Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=059-ff4&t=c>
(6/18, Leonard) says Trump’s “latest salvo in a brewing trade war would
mean a sizable amount of Chinese goods shipped to the US would be exposed
to tariff threats and raises new questions about the impact on American
consumers,” and Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=05a-ef2&t=c>
(6/18, Editorial) says the two nations “appeared increasingly headed toward
open trade conflict.”

        *Pompeo: China Engaging In “Predatory Economics 101.” *The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=05b-204&t=c>
(6/18, Karoub) reports Secretary of State Pompeo told the Detroit Economic
Club on Monday that China is engaging in “predatory economics 101” and an
“unprecedented level of larceny” of intellectual property. Pompeo said
China’s recent claims of “openness and globalization” are “a joke,” and
added that China is a “predatory economic government” that is “long overdue
in being tackled.” The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately
respond to a request for comment. Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=05c-5e5&t=c>
(6/18, Wroughton) says Pompeo said to critics of the Administration’s trade
tariffs: “Just ask yourself: Would China have allowed America to do to it
what China has done to America?”

        Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=05d-499&t=c>
(6/18, Wadhams, Gardner) says that “with the speech, Pompeo dispensed with
the conciliatory language that would normally imbue comments from the top
US diplomat. His remarks were especially jarring given that Pompeo
delivered them in Michigan, a state that would likely be hard hit by a
trade war with China and where businesses are deeply concerned about
possible aftershocks.” The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=05e-81e&t=c>
(6/18, Harris) says Pompeo’s “blistering remarks suggested that the Trump
administration – now that the Singapore summit meeting with the North
Korean leader, Kim Jong-un, is over – is further ramping up its efforts to
push back against Chinese trade practices.”

        *Hassett: US Economy Strong Enough To Handle Uncertainty Over China
Trade. *Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=05f-e8a&t=c>
(6/18, Woods) reports that in an interview with CNBC’s Squawk Box[image:
Image removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=060-d2b&t=c>
yesterday morning, White House Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Kevin
Hassett said “now is the right time to pressure China on its trade policies
because the US economy is strong enough to absorb uncertainty arising from
bilateral tensions.” Said Hassett, “When uncertainty is high, that’s
difficult for Americans, and it does depress activity a little bit. If
right in the middle of a financial crisis we added some uncertainty over
exactly how are these negotiations going to work out, then it would be
pretty harmful then. But right now, the economy has got a lot of forward
momentum.”

        *NYTimes: US Tariffs “Too Small And Narrowly Targeted” To Do
Chinese Economy Harm. *Keith Bradsher of the New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=061-c3a&t=c>
(6/18, Bradsher) writes, “Thanks to President Trump’s tariffs, Americans
will soon be paying more for a wide variety of Chinese-made goods, and some
American customers may end up buying from other countries instead.”
However, according to Bradsher, the “tariffs the White House announced on
Friday will have little immediate impact on China, despite the size of the
$50 billion in goods involved and the invective the move set off from
Chinese official news media.” Bradsher says the tariffs are “ultimately too
small and narrowly targeted to seriously impact China’s nearly $13 trillion
economy.”

        *Experts Caution Auto Tariffs Would Raise Prices, Cost Jobs. *The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=062-c36&t=c>
(6/18, Krisher) reports that if Trump “delivers on threats to slap 25
percent tariffs on imported vehicles and components, there will be far
fewer big rigs heading to factories that are now humming close to capacity
on both sides” of the US-Canadian border. While the tariff threat “could be
a negotiating ploy to restart stalled” NAFTA talks, the AP says it “also
could be real, since the administration already has imposed duties on $50
billion worth of Chinese imports, as well as steel and aluminum from China,
the European Union, Canada and Mexico.”

        *Canada Mulls Aid To Auto Firms In Response To US Tariff Threat. *
Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=063-43b&t=c>
(6/18, Ljunggren) reports Canada is considering “all options, including
providing financial aid to the auto industry, to cope up with possible US
tariffs, a senior federal minister said, even as officials expressed doubt
Washington would follow through with a threat to impose the punitive
measures.” After President Trump slapped tariffs on Canadian steel and
aluminum last month, “government ministers promised to support the sectors,
and Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains told Reuters the same kind of aid
could be ready for the auto industry.” Bains told Reuters, “We’re examining
all options ... Our view is that if any such action is taken, we’re going
to support our workers.”

        *Canadians Organizing Boycott Of US Goods. *USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=064-750&t=c>
(6/18, Meyer) reports on “a growing number of Canadians who are boycotting
US products, a decision motivated by President Donald Trump’s anti-Canadian
sentiments and tough trade stance.” Hashtags like #BoycottUSA, #BuyCanadian
and #VacationCanada – “and their French equivalents in the bilingual nation
– are bubbling among patriotic Canadians.”

        *EU Pursuing Trade Talks With Australia Following US Tariffs. *The Wall
Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=065-2c4&t=c>
(6/18, Peker) reports the EU and Australia launched free-trade talks on
Monday, part of an effort to counter fallout from tariffs imposed by the
US. European Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström, who arrived this week in
Canberra, told reporters after talks with Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull,
“It is a challenging time, so it is really good to see that Australia
shares our commitment to a positive trade agenda, and to the idea that good
trade agreements are win-win agreements. It sends a very strong political
signal that we’re launching these negotiations today.”

        *Senate Votes To Reinstate ZTE Ban. *The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=066-0a3&t=c>
(6/18, A1, Hughes, O'Keeffe) reports on its front page that the Senate
voted Monday to reinstate a ban on selling US parts to Chinese
telecommunications firm ZTE, rejecting a deal President Trump made with
Beijing to save the firm. The measure, which is part of a larger defense
bill, passed overwhelmingly in an 85-10 vote
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=067-ad9&t=c>.
The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=068-b93&t=c>
(6/18, Fandos) calls the Senate vote “a sharp rebuke of the Trump
administration’s handling of the matter that almost ensures a rare showdown
between Republican lawmakers and the White House.” Republican lawmakers are
scheduled to meet with the President at the White House on Wednesday “to
discuss a path forward, according to Senator John Cornyn.”
China Objects To New “De Facto US Embassy” In Taiwan.

The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=069-27c&t=c>
(6/18, Tan) reports that “while the world’s eyes were glued to events in
Singapore last week, the United States was holding another important – and
controversial – diplomatic ceremony in Taiwan.” The Post notes that on June
11, the US “formally opened a new $255 million building housing the
American Institute in Taiwan (AIT), the de facto US Embassy in the
country.” According to the Post, “Moving the AIT from its crumbling
1950s-era quarters to the mammoth new complex was seen in both Washington
and Taipei as a symbol of the US commitment to Taiwan,” and “the symbolism
was not lost on China.” A spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry said,
“The US, by sending officials to Taiwan under whatever pretext, severely
violates the one-China principle and three China-US joint communiques,
interferes in China’s internal affairs and exerts negative impact on
China-US relations.”

        Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=06a-29d&t=c>
(6/18, Zheng) says AIT’s incumbent director, Kin Moy, is expected “to step
down in the coming weeks after almost three years in charge,” and “the
office has yet to announce who will succeed him.” According to analysts,
“Beijing will be looking for clues to any possible changes in Washington’s
policy on Taiwan” when the US appoints his successor. Yan Lixian of
Beijing’s Research Centre on Cross-Strait Relations explained, “If there is
an obvious change in the role of the AIT after the new person is appointed,
it would be a direct challenge … and Beijing would respond to that,” but if
“Washington sticks to the one-China policy and the AIT continues to operate
as a civil, rather than diplomatic, organization, the appointment would not
be seen as having any real significance.” Politico says Secretary of State
Pompeo “currently has more than 50 posts for ambassadors and other senior
envoys to fill around the world,” so the issue of selecting Moy’s successor
“is not as straightforward as it may seem.”
Seoul: Pompeo To Meet “Soon” With North Korean Officials.

The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=06b-46e&t=c>
(6/18, Miller) reports Secretary of State Pompeo will “soon” meet with
North Korean officials to take the next step in a denuclearization deal,
South Korea Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-hwa said Monday. Said Kang, “Pompeo
has the will to push ahead with [negotiations] at a very fast speed,”
adding that he plans to “sit down with North Korea at the earliest possible
time.” State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert confirmed that Pompeo
called Kang to discuss the next steps in talks with Pyongyang. Breitbart
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=06c-a46&t=c>
(6/18, Hayward) similarly reports that the US and North Korea “are
scheduled to begin discussing the details of denuclearization this week.”
South Korea’s Chosun Ilbo
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=06d-f4f&t=c>
on Monday quoted a “diplomatic source in Washington” who “said the direct
line President Trump alluded to in comments last week has been established
and awaits only a ‘signal’ from Pyongyang before Trump and Kim can begin
talking directly.” Breitbart notes Trump told Fox News on Friday, “I’m
going to be actually calling North Korea. I can now call him.”

        Ahead of the next round of talks, Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=06e-ac2&t=c>
(6/18, Wadhams, Talev) reports Pompeo said Monday that the President agreed
to “alter” the 1953 armistice halting the Korean War if North Korea gives
up its nuclear weapons, “an apparent promise from Trump’s summit with Kim
Jong Un that wasn’t announced at the time.” Said Pompeo, “He has made very
clear his commitment to fully denuclearize his country. In return for that,
the president has committed to making sure that we alter the armistice
agreement, provide the security assurances that Chairman Kim needs.”

        *Trump Suggests Double Standard In Coverage Of North Korea
Outreach. *The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=06f-98a&t=c>
(6/18, Wagner) reports President Trump on Monday “suggested a double
standard in news media coverage of his achievements and those of President
Barack Obama, going on Twitter to complain that his predecessor would have
received far more credit for meeting with the North Korean dictator.” Trump
tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=070-bf7&t=c>,
“If President Obama (who got nowhere with North Korea and would have had to
go to war with many millions of people being killed) had gotten along with
North Korea and made the initial steps toward a deal that I have, the Fake
News would have named him a national hero!”

        *Kim In Beijing For Two-Day Visit. *The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=071-27f&t=c>
(6/19) reports that according to Chinese state media, North Korean leader
Kim Jong Un is making two-day visit to Beijing starting today. The AP says
“security was tight Tuesday morning at the Beijing airport,” and “roads
near the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse, where senior Chinese officials meet
with visiting leaders, were being closed Tuesday morning.” The Washington
Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=072-aef&t=c>
(6/18, Rauhala) says that “though neither the Chinese nor North Korean side
has released details about his itinerary, Kim’s third visit to China serves
as a reminder of Beijing’s critical role in East Asian diplomacy and close
ties to Pyongyang.” The two leaders are expected to discuss last week’s
summit in Singapore between Kim and Trump. The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=073-d00&t=c>
(6/18, Perlez) says Kim’s visit comes “as a trade war between the United
States and China is intensifying, giving him an opening to play one power
against the other – a tactic he appears to be using as the United States
presses him to destroy his nuclear arsenal.”

        *US, South Korea Agree To Suspend Joint Military Exercise. *Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=074-c4a&t=c>
(6/18, Ali) reports the US and South Korea have agreed to suspend a joint
military exercise scheduled for August, South Korean and US officials said
Monday, following President Trump’s pledge to end “war games” after his
summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un last week. A Pentagon statement
“confirmed the suspension and added that there would be a meeting between
the secretaries of Defense and State, as well as Trump’s national security
adviser, on the issue this week.”

        *Sharansky: US Should Stand With North Korean Dissidents. *Russian
rights activist Natan Sharansky writes in a Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=075-f14&t=c>
(6/18) op-ed that “although Trump’s meeting with Kim was a historic event
with potentially dramatic consequences for nuclear disarmament, it is less
clear – though no less important – what effect the meeting will have on the
dismal human-rights situation inside the hermit kingdom. Dialogue between
Pyongyang and Washington is commendable. Yet current and would-be
dissidents also need reassurance that America and other world powers
understand their struggle and will defend their basic rights.”
Trump: Germans “Turning Against Their Leadership” On Migration As Violence
Rises.

The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=076-ecc&t=c>
(6/18, Witte) reports that after “days of high-wire negotiation with
rebellious allies, German Chancellor Angela Merkel took to a podium in
Berlin on Monday to announce a compromise on migration that will hold her
government back from the brink of collapse – at least for now. Minutes
later, President Trump took to Twitter to implicitly cheer for her fall.”
Trump tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=077-297&t=c>,
“The people of Germany are turning against their leadership as migration is
rocking the already tenuous Berlin coalition. Crime in Germany is way up.
Big mistake made all over Europe in allowing millions of people in who have
so strongly and violently changed their culture!” Trump’s comments were
“widely ridiculed in Germany, even among Merkel critics.” Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=078-27d&t=c>
(6/18, Delfs, Baumgaertel) says Trump “waded into Germany’s debate over
asylum and refugee policy, criticizing the government’s stance on migration
and suggesting that its days were numbered.” Trump, “who regularly
lambastes Germany in his Twitter tirades, launched an unusually pointed
attack” on Merkel’s coalition, “asserting that its migration policy was
responsible for driving up crime rates.”

        An AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=079-412&t=c>
(6/18, Jordans) “Fact Check” says Trump is “wrong about Germany’s crime
rate, which is at its lowest in a quarter century.” According to “official
crime statistics released last month, crime in Germany dropped nearly 10
percent in 2017 compared with the previous year.” A “Fact Check” by the New
York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=07a-bec&t=c>
(6/18, Schuetze, Wolgelenter) similarly says that “the statistics refute
Mr. Trump’s suggestion. Not only was the overall crime rate down 5.1
percent over the previous year, violent crime (down 2.4 percent) and
property theft (an 11.8 percent decrease) both dropped.” A Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=07b-9e6&t=c>
(6/18, Taylor) analysis says Trump “has a history of tweeting inaccurate
statements about crime and immigration in Europe. However, it may not be
surprising that Trump sees crime rising in Germany when in fact it appears
to be falling – a considerable number of Germans feel the same way.” An
April poll, for example, “found that 41 percent of the country felt that
they were less safe in public spaces than five years ago.”
Pompeo Discusses Syria, North Korea With Lavrov.

Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=07c-cc6&t=c>
(6/18) reports Secretary of State Pompeo and Russian Foreign Minister
Sergei Lavrov “spoke by telephone on Monday and discussed Syria and
problems of the Korean peninsula, the Russia’s foreign ministry said.” The
two officials “also spoke about the schedule of political contacts between
Moscow and Washington in the nearest future and bilateral relations, the
ministry said in a statement.”

        *State Department Accuses Russia Of Using Incarceration To Suppress
Dissent. *The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=07d-51e&t=c>
(6/18, Gordon) reports that on Monday, the State Department called on
Russia to release more than 150 people imprisoned for religious and
political purposes, saying that Moscow has reverted to cruel, Soviet-era
tactics to suppress dissent. The Journal says much of the State
Department’s concern focused on Ukrainian filmmaker Oleh Sentsov, an
opponent of Russia’s annexation of Crimea currently on a hunger strike; the
US and other Western governments have described Sentsov’s 20-year prison
sentence on terrorism charges as politically motivated.

        The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=07e-958&t=c>
(6/18) editorializes that Russia’s hosting of “the World Cup soccer
extravaganza” presents a good opportunity to raise Sentsov’s case to
“remind the Russian president that his costly sport show does not wipe away
his government’s crimes.” The Times asserts that President Vladimir Putin’s
“regime alone is responsible for the assaults on Ukraine, for Mr. Sentsov’s
torture and phony trial and for whatever shadow Russia’s actions cast over
the soccer games.” The Times argues that “Sentsov is risking his life to
draw attention to all this. He and the truth he proclaims deserve the full
support of the West, no matter what is going on in Russia’s stadiums – or
in Mr. Trump’s mind.”

        *Reuters: Vienna Under Consideration As Site For Trump-Putin
Meeting. *Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=07f-5af&t=c>
(6/18, Holland) reports that Vienna is “under consideration as the site of
a potential summit” between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir
Putin, “two sources familiar with the discussions said on Monday.” The
meeting “could take place in advance of a July 11-12 NATO summit in
Brussels that Trump is expected to attend, the sources said.” Reuters notes
that Trump is also expected to visit London for talks with British Prime
Minister Theresa May on the trip.

        *Trump To Host Dutch PM For Talks On NATO, Trade. *Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=080-f08&t=c>
(6/18) briefly reports “Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte will visit the
White House on July 2 and discuss security goals within NATO, trade and
other issues” with President Trump, the White House said in a statement
Monday.

        *Turkish, US Troops Begin Patrols Around Manbij. *Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=081-51e&t=c>
(6/18, Editorial) reports US and Turkish soldiers “have started independent
patrols in northern Syria along the line separating Turkish-controlled
areas from the town of Manbij where Ankara says Kurdish militia fighters
are based.” Reuters notes that the US and Turkish governments recently
“endorsed a tentative deal to overcome months of dispute over the town, in
which the Kurdish YPG militia would withdraw from Manbij and Turkish and US
forces would jointly maintain security and stability there.”
Netanyahu Holds Talks On Jerusalem With Jordan’s King Abdullah.

The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=082-16d&t=c>
(6/18) reports Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with Jordanian
King Abdullah II in Amman on Monday for talks focused “on contested
Jerusalem.” The meeting followed “months of strained relations” between
Israel and Jordan, and “ahead of a visit to the region this week by Trump
administration envoys trying to promote a plan for an Israeli-Palestinian
peace deal.” A statement from Netanyahu’s office said the two leaders
“discussed regional developments and advancing the peace process and
bilateral relations,” and Netanyahu also “reiterated Israel’s commitment to
maintaining the status quo at the holy sites in Jerusalem,” reports Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=083-4da&t=c>
(6/18).

        *Former Israeli Government Official Charged With Spying For Iran. *The
Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=084-d98&t=c>
(6/18, Eglash) reports former Israeli energy and infrastructure minister
Gonen Segev, who “served jail time a decade ago for smuggling ecstasy, was
indicted last week by state prosecutors for ‘assisting the enemy in war and
spying against the State of Israel,’ the Israel Security Agency and the
Israel Police said in a statement Monday.” The authorities say Segev “was
allegedly providing Iranian intelligence agents with sensitive information
connected to Israel’s energy market and security sites.”
House Of Lords Rejects May’s Brexit Proposal.

Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=085-5da&t=c>
(6/18, James) reports British Prime Minister Theresa May’s Brexit plans
w”ere rejected by parliament’s upper chamber on Monday, setting up a
confrontation with pro-EU MPs later this week which will test her ability
to lead a minority government.” According to Reuters, “The outcome of that
row, playing out in the intricate process of passing different proposals
between parliament’s two chambers over the coming days, will define May’s
ability to face down rebels who want a softer version of Brexit.” The
proposal “will now be voted upon in the lower House of Commons on
Wednesday, with the pro-EU camp still seeking compromise but warning they
could collapse the government unless their demands are met.”
Domestic Policy
Media Analyses: Trump Move To Create Space Force Likely To Face Resistance
In Congress.

Media coverage of President Trump’s move Monday to create a sixth branch of
the military, a Space Force, casts the announcement as unexpected and
likely to encounter opposition from the Pentagon and Congress. Two networks
covered the move announcement night. Calling it “a surprise,” NBC Nightly
News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=086-e1f&t=c>
(6/18, story 5, 0:20, Holt) reported that during a meeting with the
National Space Council at the White House, “the President said he’s
directing the Pentagon to develop a so-called Space Force, an idea he
floated in March.” The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=087-f43&t=c>
(6/18, Dunn) quotes Trump as saying, “When it comes to defending America,
it is not enough to merely have an American presence in space. We must have
American dominance in space. We are going to have the Air Force and we are
going to have the Space Force, separate but equal.” The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=088-48d&t=c>
(6/18, Pasztor) says the move, if approved, would represent the largest
revamp of the armed forces in more than 70 years.

        David Martin said on the CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by
sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=089-853&t=c>
(6/18, story 4, 2:00, Glor) that it “would be the first new branch of the
armed services since the Air Force was created in 1947. Less than a year
ago, Secretary Mattis told Congress, ‘I do no wish to add a separate
service that would bring with it a whole new bureaucracy.’ But proponents
of the Space Force argue the Air Force is too devoted to fighters and
bombers to give space the attention and the money it deserves. ... Before
it becomes a reality, it will have to be approved by Congress.”

        The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=08a-e50&t=c>
(6/18, Kaplan, Lamothe) too notes Trump “has floated this idea before – in
March, he said he initially conceived it as a joke – but has offered few
details about how the Space Force would operate.” The idea, however, “goes
back at least a year to a proposal by Reps. Mike D. Rogers (R-Ala.) and Jim
Cooper (D-Tenn.),” who “argued that it made sense to have...a separate
branch of service.” The proposal was “scrapped amid resistance from senior
Pentagon officials, including Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, Air Force
Secretary Heather Wilson and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L.
Goldfein, who said it would create unnecessary costs and bureaucracy.” The
Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=08b-1a2&t=c>
(6/18, Mitchell) similarly says “military officials...have been lukewarm on
the idea in the past,” and to Space News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=08c-418&t=c>
(6/18, News), Trump “threw a wrench into the Pentagon’s carefully laid out
plans to analyze how best to reorganize the military’s space forces.”

        The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=08d-6dd&t=c>
(6/18, Rogers) says the idea “has troubled lawmakers and even some members
of [Trump’s] administration, who have cautioned that the action could
create unnecessary bureaucratic responsibilities for a military already
burdened by conflicts.” The Times notes that in a letter last year, Mattis
wrote, “At a time when we are trying to integrate the department’s joint
warfighting functions, I do not wish to add a separate service that would
likely present a narrower and even parochial approach to space operations.”
The plan also faces “legislative hurdles.” Sen. Bill Nelson “said the
president’s order lacked the support of the generals who would be required
to carry it out.” On Twitter, Nelson said
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=08e-ea2&t=c>,
“Thankfully the president can’t do it without Congress because now is NOT
the time to rip the Air Force apart. Too many important missions at stake.”

        USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=08f-32f&t=c>
(6/18, King) says Congress “needs to sign off on the plan first – and it
probably won’t any time soon,” Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=090-531&t=c>
(6/18, Dopp) says lawmakers “have been divided on the idea,” and according
to the Washington Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=091-568&t=c>
(6/18, Tritten), the House and Senate Armed Services Committees “were not
notified ahead” of the President’s announcement Monday, “aides in both
chambers said.”

        Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=092-60b&t=c>
(6/18, Brice) notes that the US is a member of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty,
“which bars the stationing of weapons of mass destruction in space and only
allows for the use of the moon and other celestial bodies for peaceful
purposes.”

        Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=093-366&t=c>
(6/18, Bachman) says the move “would probably be a lot more expensive than
just extending the US Air Force’s capabilities – and no doubt the nation’s
largest defense contractors love that idea.” According to Bloomberg senior
defense analyst George Ferguson, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman
and Raytheon “stand to gain more business from a new branch.”

        Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=094-9a9&t=c>
(6/18, Klimas) reports Trump on “also announced the signing of a space
policy directive Monday to make it easier for commercial companies to
operate in space and mitigate the creation of more trash in orbit,” which
the Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=095-b1c&t=c>
(6/18, Miller, Muñoz) says the White House “billed...as part of the
president’s agenda to restore US leadership in space.”
Horowitz, Wray Testify Before Senate About Clinton Probe IG Report.

ABC World News Tonight
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=096-23f&t=c>
(6/18, story 4, 2:25, Muir) reported that DOJ Inspector General Michael
Horowitz and FBI Director Wray both testified before Congress on Monday
“after that scathing report” on then-FBI director James Comey and what
senators “called his questionable moves, going public involving Hillary
Clinton, not once, but twice, but then recommending no charges.” ABC’s
Pierre Thomas: “President Trump claims a report from the Inspector General
has cleared him of any wrongdoing.” Trump: “I think that the report
yesterday maybe more importantly than anything, it totally exonerates me.
There was no collusion, there was no obstruction. And if you read the
report, you’ll see that.” Thomas: “But today, the Inspector General
contradicting the President, saying his report was focused on the Hillary
Clinton e-mail investigation, not Russia.” Horowitz: “We did not look into
collusion questions.” Senate Minority Whip Durbin: “You address the
credibility of the investigation of Robert Mueller?” Horowitz: “We did not
address the credibility of the special counsel’s investigation here.”

        USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=097-e15&t=c>
(6/18, Johnson) reports, “In his first public comments since delivering the
568-page report last week, Horowitz told the Senate Judiciary Committee
that cascading errors in judgment by top Justice and FBI officials
seriously endangered the reputations of both institutions.” Though there
was “no finding of undue political influence, Horowitz acknowledged the
‘troubling’ discovery of caches of text messages exchanged between” FBI
officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page “that disparaged Donald Trump as a
presidential candidate – a finding that fuels claims by the president and
some Republican lawmakers that the FBI is biased against Trump.” The
President tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=098-d6d&t=c>
Monday, “Comey gave Strozk his marching orders. Mueller is Comey’s best
friend. Witch Hunt!”

        The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=099-99e&t=c>
(6/18, Wilber, Gurman) reports that Horowitz reiterated that there was no
evidence that bias played a role in the investigation, though he said that
he could not be sure of the same regarding the FBI’s decision to wait a
month before examining the contents of a laptop owned by Anthony Weiner,
the then-husband of Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

        The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=09a-1bd&t=c>
(6/18, Demirjian) reports, “Lawmakers on each side of the aisle used
various findings in the report to support their long-held talking points.”
Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley “asserted that the report showed
Clinton ‘got the kid glove treatment,’” while ranking member Sen. Dianne
Feinstein “countered that the inspector general ‘found no evidence of
political bias’ in the Clinton email case.” The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=09b-33d&t=c>
(6/18, Fandos, Goldman) reports that while “Democrats and Republicans
jostled for political points...it became evident that there was little”
that Horowitz “could say to sway either side in their long political fight
over what occurred at the F.B.I. in the run-up to the 2016 election.”

        The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=09c-6d6&t=c>
(6/18, Tucker, Jalonick) reports that Wray also said the FBI “is determined
to not repeat any of the mistakes identified” in the “harshly critical
watchdog report.” Wray said, “We’re going to learn from the report and be
better as a result.” Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=09d-6bb&t=c>
(6/18, Lynch) reports that committee Democrats pressed Wray “about whether
some FBI agents may have leaked damaging information” about Clinton to Rudy
Giuliani “shortly before the 2016 election.” Wray “said his office was
‘aggressively investigating a number of leaks,’ but offered no details.”

        *Grassley Says Comey Refused To Testify. *The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=09e-e11&t=c>
(6/18, Dinan) reports that Grassley said Monday that Comey “refused to
appear...to talk about his handling of the Clinton email investigation, and
his fired deputy, Andrew McCabe, asserted his Fifth Amendment rights
against self-incrimination.” Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=09f-674&t=c>
(6/18, Morin) reports that Grassley also wrote to Wray asking whether the
FBI “had obtained any material from James Comey’s personal devices, after
the department’s watchdog reported last week that the former director at
times used his private email account for work.”

        *Eight House Republicans Seek Names Of Unidentified FBI Employees
In Report. *The Washington Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0a0-922&t=c>
(6/18, Quinn) reports that eight House Republicans sent a letter to
Horowitz asking him “to hand over the names of unidentified FBI agents and
employees mentioned” in his report. They wrote, “As representatives of the
American people, Congress deserves to know exactly who contributed to the
abuse of power at the Department of Justice and FBI. These individuals need
to be held accountable and only transparency will ensure that action.”

        *Sessions Says DOJ Intends To Respond To House Subpoena. *Wall
Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0a1-ced&t=c>
(6/18) columnist William McGurn writes that Congress should impeach Deputy
Attorney General Rod Rosenstein over the DOJ’s slowness in responding to a
House subpoena. Asked about the delay on Fox News’ Ingraham Angle[image:
Image removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0a2-565&t=c>
(6/18), Attorney General Sessions said, “We intend to be responsive to
Congress. If we are running behind in production, will take efforts to step
it up. We have a responsibility to produce the documents that are properly
disclosable and we intend to do so.”

        *WPost: “At Least Six Members” Of Trump’s Team Knew About Russian
Outreach. *Philip Bump of the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0a3-527&t=c>
(6/18) reports that with the revelation of “a previously unknown point of
contact between the 2016 Donald Trump campaign and a Russian offering
negative information” about Clinton, “at least six members of Trump’s
broader team knew about offers of dirt from Russians during that campaign –
and, depending on how that information was shared, as many as 10 may have,
including Trump.”

        The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0a4-de2&t=c>
(6/18) editorializes, “Hardly a goes by in which President Trump fails to
call the Russia probe a ‘witch hunt.’ Yet barely less frequent are the
reminders of his damaged credibility on the subject.” Special Counsel
Robert Mueller “is conducting an essential inquiry into a foreign effort to
influence U.S. elections, amid increasingly worrying signs of Trump team
contacts with Russians.”

        *Steele Deposed In London. *The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0a5-5e7&t=c>
(6/18, Scarborough) reports, “Anti-Trump dossier writer Christopher Steele
on Monday underwent his first adversarial questioning” since the dossier
became publicly known in January 2017. Steele “is being sued for libel by
Aleksej Gubarev, a Russian tech entrepreneur,” and he was deposed Monday. A
Gubarev attorney confirmed that the deposition took place, but could not
provide details because the testimony was designated as confidential by
Steele’s legal team.
Acosta: Association Plans Will Help Blunt Small Business Healthcare Costs.

Labor Secretary Acosta, in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0a6-bf0&t=c>
(6/18), writes that the Administration is expanding access to association
health plans (AHPs) to address the lack of affordable healthcare options
for small-business owners and their employees, which Acosta attributes to
the Affordable Care Act. Acosta argues that all the new rule does is allow
small businesses to have the same regulatory burden and enter the same
healthcare insurance market as larger businesses.

        *LePage Continues To Resist Implementing Voter-Approved Medicaid
Expansion. *The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0a7-61c&t=c>
(6/18, Levitz) reports that, in the face of two state court rulings,
Maine’s Republican Governor, Paul LePage, continues to resist implementing
the state’s voter-approved Medicaid expansion, asking the state’s Supreme
Judicial Court to intervene. LePage’s administration argues that the
expansion hasn’t been properly funded.
Trump Nominates Kraninger To Head CFPB.

Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0a8-45e&t=c>
(6/18, Editorial) reports that the President has nominated Kathleen
Kraninger to be CFPB director, according to a White House statement. Bloomberg
News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0a9-baa&t=c>
(6/18, Dexheimer) says Kraninger, “a little-known official who has worked
for the White House’s Office of Management and Budget since March 2017,” is
“likely to face a tough Senate confirmation process over who should lead
the agency that Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren is credited for creating
in the wake of the financial crisis to protect consumers from financial
abuse.”

        *House Financial Aide To Be Nominated To Run US Office of Financial
Research. *The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0aa-873&t=c>
(6/18, Tracy) reports the White House plans to nominate Dino Falaschetti,
chief economist for the House Financial Services Committee, as director of
the US Office of Financial Research. The agency, which has lacked a
permanent head since last year, has struggled in its mission of tracking
financial risks. Its employees suffer from low morale and Trump officials
plan staff reductions.

        *Patterson Stepping Down As DEA Administrator. *The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0ab-3f7&t=c>
(6/18, Barrett) reports that acting DEA head Robert Patterson sent an email
to employees Monday “saying he will retire in about two weeks.” In the
email, Patterson said he “realized that the administrator of the DEA needs
to decide and address priorities for years into the future – something
which has become increasingly challenging in an acting capacity.”
Supreme Court Rulings Sidestep Decision On Partisan Gerrymandering.

The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0ac-0c4&t=c>
(6/18, Liptak) reports that in a pair of unanimous decisions on “potential
constitutional blockbusters,” the Supreme Court on “avoided answering the
central questions in two closely watched challenges to partisan
gerrymandering,” instead ruling on technical grounds. The decisions, which
leave the status quo in place, are “a setback for critics of partisan
gerrymandering,” although they “left the door open to further challenges.”
In a case from Wisconsin the court sent the case back to the trial court
for the plaintiffs to prove they “suffered the sort of direct injury that
would give them standing to sue.” In a case from Maryland, “the court said
the challengers had waited too long to seek an injunction blocking a
congressional map drawn in 2011.” The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0ad-d2a&t=c>
(6/18, Barnes) reports calls the rulings “a technical resolution of what
has seemed to hold the promise of being a landmark decision.”

        *Supreme Court To Hear Antitrust Suit Over Apple’s App Store. *
Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0ae-e7e&t=c>
(6/18, Chung) reports the Supreme Court agreed to hear Apple’s appeal of a
lower court’s ruling that revived the a class-action antitrust lawsuit over
commissions Apple receives through its App Store. The Administration
supports Apple in the case, which “could expand the threat of antitrust
damages against companies in the rapidly growing field of electronic
commerce.” At issue is whether the plaintiffs were not directly
overcharged, and thus barred from seeking damages for anti-competitive
conduct.

        *Supreme Court Rules For Florida Man In Free Speech Case. *The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0af-b9f&t=c>
(6/18, Gresko) reports the Supreme Court found for Fane Lozman, who was
arrested at while talking about corruption during a public comment portion
of a City of Riviera Beach, Florida city council meeting. Lozman sued,
arguing the arrest was retaliation for criticizing the city, but a court
said the suit was barred because “a jury found a police officer had
probable cause to arrest him.” However, Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing in
an 8-1 decision, said that the “appeals court should look at several issues
when re-evaluating the case, directing the court to use as guidance a
previous case that Lozman had advocated.” Under the headline, “A Persistent
Gadfly Wins Again In The Supreme Court,” the New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0b0-56f&t=c>
(6/18, Liptak) reports this is the second Supreme Court victory for Lozman,
who won a 2013 Supreme Court case “when the justices ruled that the city
had misused maritime law to seize and destroy his houseboat.” The current
case arose from a 2006 closed-door meeting of city officials, at which,
“according to a transcript later made public under Florida’s
freedom-of-information law, the city’s leaders spoke freely about finding a
way to investigate and threaten Mr. Lozman.”
NYTimes: Trump Undermining Growing Industries To Help Steel, Coal.

Under the headline, “Trump Picks Economic Winners, Guided By Nostalgia,”
the New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0b1-8bc&t=c>
(6/18, Plumer, Tankersley) reports that President Trump “is increasingly
putting his finger on the scale to help once-iconic industries that are
declining as a share of the American economy, at the expense of some of the
country’s fastest-growing sectors.” According to the Times, the
Administration’s “attempts to boost domestic steel manufacturing and coal
mining” have “produced only modest job gains so far,” but “have injected
uncertainty into a host of other growing industries – such as advanced
manufacturing, natural gas production and renewable energy generation –
that have helped drive American job creation since the Great Recession.”
The Times says that “by crafting an industrial policy that largely looks to
the past, Mr. Trump differs from his predecessors, who often attempted to
hasten the emergence of new industries and position the United States to
lead the way.”

        *Economic Confidence Increasing Among Lower-Income Americans. *The Wall
Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0b2-4b4&t=c>
(6/18, Chaney) reports an IHS Markit analysis of the University of
Michigan’s consumer-sentiment index found economic confidence among
households in the bottom third income tier, grew 11.4 points since
February, which the Journal attributes to them seeing benefits of economic
expansion. Chris Christopher, IHS Markit executive director attributed the
increase to the tightening labor market and the tax cut. Meanwhile,
sentiment among the highest third of incomes fell more than eight points,
which Christopher said was due to stock-market volatility and the
possiblity of trade wars.
Civil Rights Groups Urge NFL To Reverse National Anthem Rule.

USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0b3-75e&t=c>
(6/18, Berry, Reyes) reports that in a letter sent to NFL commissioner
Roger Goodell “national civil rights groups called on the NFL Monday to
reverse its decision to punish players who kneel during the national anthem
and fine teams whose players don’t comply, saying the peaceful protests are
what the American flag represents.” The groups also seek a meeting with
Goodell “in hopes of getting the league to abandon its new rule.” The civil
rights groups argue that in a democracy athletes should be able to
peacefully protest against “police brutality, particularly against people
of color.” A Quinnipiac University poll conducted June 8 (+ / -3.4%) “found
58 percent of voters don’t think kneeling is unpatriotic compared to 35
percent who do.”
Cancer Research
Johns Hopkins Biotech Spinoff Secures $32.5M For Immunotherapy Treatment
Trial.

The Baltimore Sun
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0b4-f11&t=c>
(6/18, Cohn) reports Johns Hopkins spinoff WindMIL Therapeutics, which is
in the second phase of a clinical trial for its cancer immunotherapy for
high-risk multiple myeloma patients, “has secured $32.5 million in
financing to continue developing its products.” WindMIL “said it completed
a Series B financing round led by Qiming Venture Partners USA,” and counts
among its new investors Medivate Partners, the Kinneret Group, and Camden
Partners Nexus.
Researchers: All Women Should Be Evaluated For Breast Cancer Risk By Age 30.

Health
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0b5-5f1&t=c>
(6/18, Klein) reports, “An article
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0b6-c05&t=c>
published earlier this year in the Journal of the American College of
Radiology addressing breast cancer screening recommendations for high-risk
women” suggests that “all women” should be “evaluated for breast cancer
risk by age 30.” The JACR article’s authors wrote, “All women, especially
black women and those of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, should be evaluated for
breast cancer risk no later than age 30, so that those at higher risk can
be identified and can benefit from supplemental screening.” This “urging,
says lead author Debra Monticciolo, MD...stems from the fact that certain
high-risk women could benefit from either earlier or different types of
screening – or both.”
Editorials/Op-Eds
New York Times.

*“A Siberian Prisoner Spoils Putin’s Extravaganza.”* The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0b7-3eb&t=c>
(6/18) editorializes that Russia’s hosting of “the World Cup soccer
extravaganza” presents a good opportunity “to raise the case of Oleg
Sentsov, a Ukrainian filmmaker who has been on a hunger strike for more
than a month in a remote Siberian penal colony, to remind the Russian
president that his costly sport show does not wipe away his government’s
crimes.” The Times asserts that Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “regime
alone is responsible for the assaults on Ukraine, for Mr. Sentsov’s torture
and phony trial and for whatever shadow Russia’s actions cast over the
soccer games.” The Times concludes in stressing that “Sentsov is risking
his life to draw attention to all this. He and the truth he proclaims
deserve the full support of the West, no matter what is going on in
Russia’s stadiums – or in Mr. Trump’s mind.”

        *“When Did Caging Kids Become The Art Of The Deal?” *A New York
Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0b8-2de&t=c>
(6/18) editorial says that watching Trump “blame Democrats for his
administration’s inhumane practice of snatching immigrant children from
their parents at the border evokes nothing so much as an abusive husband
blaming his wife for the beatings he delivers.” The Times calls the
practice “immoral” and says lawmakers “should not negotiate with the
president until he puts a stop to this ‘zero tolerance’ insanity.”

        *Soros Urges US, Europe To Support Stabilization In Balkans. *In a New
York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0b9-356&t=c>
(6/18) op-ed, Open Society Foundations founder and chairman George Soros
and deputy chairman Alexander Soros stress that it “would be a mistake to
dismiss” the “historic compromise to rename the country the Republic of
Northern Macedonia” as a “minor development,” especially at a time “when
the unity of the trans-Atlantic alliance is at its lowest point since World
War II and the unity of the European Union is under challenge in every
national election.” They explain the deal “presents a historic opportunity”
for “economic union in the Balkans,” and the US and Europe “need to become
enthusiastic supporters.” The authors warn this “hard-won agreement on
Macedonia could still be undermined,” and if “Western powers fail to keep
the Balkan countries on track toward local cooperation and eventual
European Union membership, these states will be pushed, and possibly
divided, into the spheres of influence of Russia, Turkey and China,
effectively Balkanizing the Balkans once again.”
Washington Post.

*“The Trump Administration Created This Awful Border Policy. It Doesn’t
Need Congress To Fix It.”* In an editorial, the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0ba-76c&t=c>
(6/18) that no one in the Administration has tried to “justify breaking up
families” because “there is nothing that can justify” the policy.

        *“Yet Another Russia Contact With The Trump Campaign Team. What Are
They Hiding?” *The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0bb-3fa&t=c>
(6/18) editorializes, “Hardly a goes by in which President Trump fails to
call the Russia probe a ‘witch hunt.’ Yet barely less frequent are the
reminders of his damaged credibility on the subject.” Special Counsel
Robert Mueller “is conducting an essential inquiry into a foreign effort to
influence U.S. elections, amid increasingly worrying signs of Trump team
contacts with Russians.”

        *“Colombia’s New Leader Should Tread Carefully On The Peace
Accord.” *The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0bc-41d&t=c>
(6/18) editorializes that Colombia’s President-elect Ivan Duque is “a
long-standing critic of the peace deal” forged between the Colombian
government and former FARC rebels, so his Sunday electoral win cast doubt
on the broader “peace process at a moment when violence in post-conflict
zones is on the rise.” The Post argues that “Duque wisely addressed these
concerns on Sunday evening, pledging to push forward with large parts of
the peace accord and to continue supporting the reintegration of former
rebel combatants.” To the Post, Duque’s remarks “will be a welcome
foundation for the presidency he will begin in August.”

*Copyright 2018 by Bulletin Intelligence LLC* Reproduction or
redistribution without permission prohibited. Content is drawn from
thousands of newspapers, national magazines, national and local television
programs, radio broadcasts, social-media platforms and additional forms of
open-source data. Sources for Bulletin Intelligence audience-size estimates
include Scarborough, GfK MRI, comScore, Nielsen, and the Audit Bureau of
Circulation. Data from and access to third party social media platforms,
including but not limited to Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and others, is
subject to the respective platform’s terms of use. Services that include
Factiva content are governed by Factiva’s terms of use
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0bd-ae2&t=c>.
Services including embedded Tweets are also subject to Twitter for
Website's information and privacy policies
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018061901biden&r=email-ab2f&l=0be-86c&t=c>.
The Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing is published five
days a week by Bulletin Intelligence, which creates custom briefings for
government and corporate leaders. We can be found on the Web at
BulletinIntelligence.com, or called at (703) 483-6100