Subject: FW: Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Friday, September 14, 2018
From: "Kathy Chung" <[email-masked]>
To: "Ashley Blazer Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Hunter Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Jill Tracy Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Jimmy Biden" <[email-masked]>, "Valerie Biden Owens" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 09:09:24 -0400

Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing

*From:* Bulletin Intelligence <[email-masked]>
*Sent:* Friday, September 14, 2018 7:54 AM
*To:* [email-masked]
*Subject:* Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Friday,
September 14, 2018

*Click to access
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=000-88a&t=c>
mobile-optimized online version, including download options and an audio
reader.*

[image: Image removed by sender. Office of Vice President Biden
Intelligence Briefing]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=001-841&t=c>

*To: Vice President Joe Biden*

*Friday, September 14, 2018 8:00 AM EDT*
Today's Table of Contents

*Biden in the News <#SECTION_1>*

• At Wage Summit, Biden Mocks Trump Over Puerto Rico Claim, Blasts “Phony
Populism.” <#S1>

• Biden To Help Raise Cash For DNC In Boston On Sept. 30. <#S2>

*Leading the News <#SECTION_2>*

• Trump Dismisses Maria Death Estimates As Partisan Effort To Smear Him.
<#S3>

• Florence Begins Lashing Carolina Coast. <#S4>

*Foreign Policy <#SECTION_3>*

• Trump: Kerry Held “Illegal Meetings” With “Very Hostile Iranian Regime.”
<#S5>

• Syrian Rebels Confident US Assistance Will Allow Them To Prolong Civil
War. <#S6>

• Kushner Defends Actions Against Palestinians, Says It’ll Help Peace Deal.
<#S7>

• Treasury Department Sanctions Two North Korean-Backed IT Companies. <#S8>

• State Dept. Official: US Prepared To Impose Additional Sanctions On
Russia. <#S9>

• US, Cuban Officials Discuss Mysterious Attacks On Diplomats In Havana.
<#S10>

• Trudeau Says He Wants Trade Deal; Kudlow Says Dairy Disagreements Key
Issue. <#S11>

*Domestic Policy <#SECTION_4>*

• Stumping In Ohio, Obama Says Midterms Can Return “Sanity To Our Politics.”
<#S12>

• Feinstein Refers Letter To FBI Alleging Sexual Misconduct By Kavanaugh In
High School. <#S13>

• Manafort Reportedly Has Tentatively Agreed To Plea Deal. <#S14>

• Republicans Agree To Postpone Debate Over Border Wall Until After
Midterms. <#S15>

• House Panel Votes To Make Trump Tax Cuts Permanent. <#S16>

• Sessions Urges US Attorneys To Resist “Unconstitutional” Nationwide
Injunctions. <#S17>

• NLRB Moves To Make Challenging Workplace Labor Practices More Difficult.
<#S18>

*Cancer Research <#SECTION_5>*

• ACA Increased Insurance Coverage For Those With Head, Neck Cancer. <#S19>

• Boehringer Ingelheim To Buy ViraTherapeutics In Deal For Cancer-Killing
Viruses. <#S20>

*Editorials/Op-Eds <#SECTION_6>*

• New York Times. <#S21>

• Washington Post. <#S22>
Biden in the News
At Wage Summit, Biden Mocks Trump Over Puerto Rico Claim, Blasts “Phony
Populism.”

USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=002-ea4&t=c>
(9/13, Kelly) reports that former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday
“mocked” President Trump’s contention “that ‘3000 people did not die’ in
hurricanes that devastated Puerto Rico last year. ‘By the way, there’s no
problems in America,’ Biden said sarcastically during an economic speech at
The Century Foundation, a Washington think tank. ‘Everybody’s doing well.
Things are fair and decent, and no one died in Puerto Rico.’” Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=003-8f4&t=c>
(9/13, Rodriguez) also reported that Biden “mocked” Trump on the issue,
contesting “the pair of tweets that Trump wrote earlier in the day, in
which” he “said that ‘3000 people did not die in the two hurricanes that
hit Puerto Rico’ and that Democrats had fabricated the number, engaging in
‘bad politics’ to tarnish his reputation.”

        The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=004-fbf&t=c>
(9/13, Chasmar) reports that Biden’s remarks on Puerto Rico came “at the
top of his speech Thursday at the ‘Building a Higher Wage America’ summit
in DC.” Biden “went on to blast the ‘phony populism’ and ‘naked
nationalism’ that has taken the forefront of American politics, and he
criticized ‘charlatans’ who attempt to blame people’s economic woes on
illegal immigrants or ‘the other.’ ‘Without the wage gains we need, we’re
going to see four in 10 families saying they can’t make ends meet, and
they’re going to be susceptible to demagoguery,’ he said.”

        The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=005-82c&t=c>
(9/13, Sonmez) reports that Biden “mocked” Trump’s propensity for “boasting
about his intelligence,” offering “one of his most direct critiques of the
president ahead of a potential 2020 White House bid. In a wide-ranging
speech in Washington on labor issues and economic policy,” Biden said “that
he had performed well on standardized tests as a student, then quipped:
‘I’m clearly not as smart as Trump, the smartest man in the world. But I
have a relatively high IQ.’ Trump in January praised himself as a ‘very
stable genius’ and frequently boasted long before his 2016 presidential run
that his IQ ‘is one of the highest.’”

        Newsweek
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=006-d4e&t=c>
(9/14, Sharkov) reports that Biden “dropped the sarcasm afterwards,”
accusing Trump “of willingly ignoring the issues facing the United States.
Speaking about the working families across the country that are not feeling
the boom of the economy, he said many cannot keep up with the rising cost
of living. ‘The lack of a value set, lack of treating people with dignity
is because when things are tough for people economically who work hard,
there are sometimes charlatans who come along who try to find a reason for
those people to blame whatever’s happening to them on the other,’ he said.”

        The Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=007-0ca&t=c>
(9/13, Samuels) also reports on Biden’s speech, while the C-SPAN Video
Library
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=008-071&t=c>
(9/13) provides video of Thursday’s nearly four-and-a-half hour event.
Biden’s speech begins at the three hour and 37 minute-mark of the video.
Biden To Help Raise Cash For DNC In Boston On Sept. 30.

The Boston Globe
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=009-a65&t=c>
(9/13, Pindell) reports that former Vice President Joe Biden “will return
to Boston later this month to headline a fund-raiser for the Democratic
National Committee.” Biden and DNC chief Tom Perez “will appear together at
the Sept. 30 event with tickets starting at $5,000 for an individual and
topping out at $33,900 for a couple, according to an invitation” to the
fundraiser. Biden “was last in Boston nearly a year ago to promote his
latest book, ‘Promise Me, Dad.’”
Leading the News
Trump Dismisses Maria Death Estimates As Partisan Effort To Smear Him.

President Trump tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=00a-dc6&t=c>
yesterday, “3000 people did not die in the two hurricanes that hit Puerto
Rico. When I left the Island, AFTER the storm had hit, they had anywhere
from 6 to 18 deaths. As time went by it did not go up by much. Then, a long
time later, they started to report really large numbers, like
3000...[continuing
tweet
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=00b-d23&t=c>]...This
was done by the Democrats in order to make me look as bad as possible when
I was successfully raising Billions of Dollars to help rebuild Puerto Rico.
If a person died for any reason, like old age, just add them onto the list.
Bad politics. I love Puerto Rico!” The CBS Evening News[image: Image
removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=00c-578&t=c>
(9/13, story 7, 1:50, Jiang) reported that “in a new statement just out”
last night, the White House said “every death from Hurricane Maria is a
horror, but...the [GWU] study” that came up with the revised death toll “is
just a statistical estimate and not a confirmed list of deaths.”

        Reports on Trump’s claim dismiss his contention out of hand,
however, and use it to cast doubt on his Administration’s ability to
respond to Hurricane Florence. Moreover, media outlets present the fatality
estimate released last month by GWU as fully verified. Exemplifying much of
the coverage, the first sentence of a CNN
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=00d-715&t=c>
(9/13, Klein) story on Trump’s claims was, “Nearly 3,000 people died in the
aftermath of Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico,” and “Trump denied this
reality as a hurricane barrels toward the Carolinas.” The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=00e-7bb&t=c>
(9/13, Sullivan, Davis, Fandos) says Trump “falsely accused Democrats of
inflating the death toll from Hurricane Maria” and NBC Nightly News[image:
Image removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=00f-4b1&t=c>
(9/13, story 10, 1:50, Welker) said that he “is falsely blaming Democrats.”
The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=010-848&t=c>
(9/13, Lucey, Miller, Lemire) casts Trump as “arguing without evidence” as
he “rejected the official conclusion,” and Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=011-e34&t=c>
(9/13, Chiacu) reports that “privately, some White House officials were
exasperated with the president’s focus on Puerto Rico at a time when
Florence is bearing down on the US East Coast.” Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=012-0e7&t=c>
(9/13, Restuccia, Choi) notes that “asked about the president’s comments,
one former administration official said simply, ‘Surreal.’”

        White House correspondent Kaitlin Collins said on CNN’s Situation
Room
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=013-1c4&t=c>
(9/13) that Trump is “in the middle of a man-made disaster...after falsely
claiming 3,000 people didn’t die when Hurricane Maria devastated Puerto
Rico last year.” On CNN’s The Lead
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=014-877&t=c>
(9/13), Jake Tapper called it “a shocking and disturbing false claim
from...Trump,” and CNN political analyst Kirsten Powers, also on CNN’s The
Lead
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=015-78e&t=c>
(9/13), said Trump’s “only focus, and this has been this way since the day
he took office, is on his base. That’s all he seems to care about is what
his base thinks about him, and he knows that his base is not watching us
right now. They are watching Fox News, and over at Fox” the disaster in
Puerto Rico “never happened. I mean, it’s an alternative universe, so they
are never going to hear about this. They get all their information from
Rush Limbaugh, Fox News and Donald Trump’s Twitter feed.”

        ABC World News Tonight
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=016-89a&t=c>
(9/13, story 6, 3:00, Karl) reported the 3,000 figure was “accepted by the
government as the official death toll. That’s nearly 3,000 American
citizens, most of them poor and elderly,” and “our team saw the suffering
first-hand.” Earlier, on ABC’s Good Morning America[image: Image removed by
sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=017-8ce&t=c>
(9/13), Jonathan Karl said Trump “is praising his own response and his
government’s response to Hurricane Maria, which, of course, has been seen
by many as a disaster.” At the opening of MSNBC’s Morning Joe[image: Image
removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=018-731&t=c>
(9/13), meanwhile, Mika Brzezinski pointed out that “new polling shows more
than half of Puerto Rico’s residents give president trump a negative rating
for his response to the storm. 52% say he did a poor job. Only 15% say he
did an excellent and very good job.”

        Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=019-297&t=c>
(9/13, Restuccia, Choi) says Trump “peddled a conspiracy theory” and adds
that “even for a president who has made a career off politically incorrect
pronouncements, Thursday’s tweets were eye-popping.” CQ Roll Call
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=01a-80e&t=c>
(9/13, Bennett) refers to a “Twitter rant” by Trump, while in a Washington
Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=01b-324&t=c>
(9/13) “Fact check,” Glenn Kessler gives him “Four Pinocchios” for his
claims and Axios
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=01c-312&t=c>
(9/13, Britzky, Freedman) reports, “Reality check: Trump is wrong.” Along
similar lines, a Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=01d-717&t=c>
(9/13, Ballhaus) report also disputes Trump’s conclusions.

        USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=01e-810&t=c>
(9/13, Jackson, Fritze) reports “San Juan’s mayor described the president’s
claim as ‘delusional,’” and the New York Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=01f-796&t=c>
(9/13, Eustachewich) notes her “livid response” Twitter, where she wrote
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=020-5eb&t=c>,
“Simply put: delusional, paranoid, and unhinged from any sense of reality.
... Trump is so vain he thinks this is about him. NO IT IS NOT.” She later
added
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=021-335&t=c>,
“Damn it: this is NOT about politics this was always about SAVING LIVES.”
The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=022-dd4&t=c>
(9/13, Muñoz) reports Puerto Rico’s Gov. Ricardo Rossello also “pushed back
against the president’s comments Thursday,” saying, “Neither the people of
Puerto Rico or the victims deserve their pain to be questioned.”

        The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=023-993&t=c>
(9/13) editorializes, “If you’ve stopped being surprised by the flagrancy
of...Trump’s deceptions, you’re not alone. Yet the president’s effort on
Thursday to deny the nearly 3,000 American lives lost in Puerto Rico in the
aftermath of Hurricane Maria last year – and to accuse Democrats of
inflating the death toll for political gain – should amaze even the most
jaundiced Trump-watcher.” The Times further refers to Trump’s “his latest
bit of mendacity” and adds that “for most presidents, thousands of dead
Americans would be a cause for grief. For Mr. Trump, they are evidence only
of his own victimhood.” The Times concludes, “Democrats don’t need to lift
a finger to make him look bad. He is managing that all on his own.”

        *Dobbs, Hurt, Breitbart’s Pollack Among Those Agreeing With
Trump. *Trump
yesterday re-tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=024-7b2&t=c>
a post from Lou Dobbs, who wrote, “#FakeNews- The Hurricane Maria death
tolls have been inflated & President @realDonaldTrump was right to call out
organizations who threw out science and statistics to try to discredit his
administration.” Dobbs said on Fox Business’ Lou Dobbs Tonight[image: Image
removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=025-824&t=c>
(9/13), “The President, by the way, is right. The study the President
alluded to is one produced last month by the Milken institute at George
Washington yesterday. Almost a year later the number went from 65 people
killed to 2,975 people attributed to the storm. The finding wasn’t a result
of a death toll count, a body count nor a study of death certificates, but
a public health study that subtracted number of people who theoretically
should have died over the same period from the number of people who were
reported dead over that period.” Dobbs added, “The numbers were inflated
and the President was right to call out the organizations who threw out
science, statistics, and evidence to discredit Trump Administration.”

        Charles Hurt of the Washington Times said on Fox News’ Special
Report
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=026-546&t=c>
(9/13), “What he said about the numbers, that is correct. When he left, at
that time, the numbers were and they were revised upwards, six months later
and then a year or more later. ... Donald Trump isn’t the person who
politicized the weather. That’s been going on for a longtime.”

        Also taking Trump’s side in the dispute is Joel Pollack of Breitbart
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=027-960&t=c>
(9/13, Pollak), who says that after multiple studies last year pegged the
death toll at somewhere under 1000, new studies were conducted “based on
statistical models, not on actual death counts.” Pollack says this is “a
rather useless way of comparing death tolls, because in order to evaluate
the relative scale of Hurricane Maria, the same method would have to be
used to measure other natural disasters, likely increasing their estimated
death tolls as well.” Nevertheless, Pollack says “the media reported the
new estimate as if it were an actual confirmed death toll,” and “the Puerto
Rican governor, under heavy political pressure due to the slow pace of the
island’s recovery, officially revised the death toll to match the
estimate.” The Washington Free Beacon
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=028-f44&t=c>
(9/13, Crookston) similarly reports that the 3,000 figure “is only an
estimate, however, since they did not study how each individual died,
although they hope to conduct that study in the future.”

        The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=029-a57&t=c>
(9/13, Achenbach) reports, meanwhile, that “the GWU study looked at the
number of deaths from September 2017 to February 2018 and compared that
total with what would have been expected based on historical patterns. They
factored in many variables, including the departure of hundreds of
thousands of island residents in the aftermath of Maria.” According to the
Post, “A clear pattern emerged from the analysis: The mortality rate spiked
in the months after the storm, particularly in the poorest areas of Puerto
Rico, and among elderly males.” The CBS Evening News[image: Image removed
by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=02a-844&t=c>
(9/13, story 7, 1:50, Jiang) also explained that “the death toll is based
on the work of George Washington University researchers who looked at how
many people were expected to die in the six months following Hurricane
Maria had the storm not occurred, compared to actual fatalities.”

        Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=02b-9cb&t=c>
(9/13, Shields) explains that “more people die in the months after a storm
as vital medical care is cut off – for instance, patients can’t get
insulin, or respirators and kidney dialysis equipment fail as electricity
quits. As months go by chronic diseases worsen, a trend amplified as
qualified doctors and nurses leave because their clinics and practices are
crippled.”

        *Florida Republicans, Ryan Dispute Trump’s Claims. *The Washington
Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=02c-467&t=c>
(9/13, Dawsey) accuses Trump of “falsely claiming a conspiracy to inflate
the death toll in Puerto Rico,” and adds that his “brash comments...drew
only scattered criticism among Republican lawmakers, underscoring the
trepidation of most GOP politicians to cross a president who enjoys deep
and solid support among the party’s base voters.” The Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=02d-db2&t=c>
(9/13, Bernal, Wong, Zanona), however, says Trump “roiled Democrats and
Republicans alike,” while McClatchy
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=02e-5f6&t=c>
(9/13, Daugherty, Neal) points out his claims come “after Florida
Republicans have spent the past year courting Puerto Rican voters ahead of
the 2018 election, some of whom relocated to Florida after Hurricane
Maria.”

        USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=02f-adf&t=c>
(9/13, Jackson, Fritze) reports Gov. Rick Scott, “a Republican and early
Trump supporter,” also “said he disagreed with the president,” tweeting
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=030-519&t=c>,
“I’ve been to Puerto Rico 7 times & saw devastation firsthand. ... The loss
of any life is tragic; the extent of lives lost as a result of Maria is
heart wrenching. I’ll continue to help PR.”

        The Naples (FL) Daily News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=031-d0b&t=c>
(9/13, Ceballos) reports Trump’s comments “prompted disagreement from his
biggest Florida allies, including Republican gubernatorial candidate Ron
DeSantis.” In “a rare instance of disagreement with Trump,” the DeSantis
campaign said, “Ron DeSantis is committed to standing with the Puerto Rican
community, especially after such a tragic loss of life. He doesn’t believe
any loss of life has been inflated.” Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=032-4dc&t=c>
(9/13, Caputo) says that “facing Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), Scott has
increasingly put some distance between himself and Trump,” but “DeSantis,
who owes his Aug. 28 gubernatorial primary win to Trump, hadn’t criticized
the president publicly. That changed Thursday.”

        USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=033-bdd&t=c>
(9/13, Jackson, Fritze) reports that “Sen. Marco Rubio, a Florida
Republican who has been outspoken on the government’s response to the
storm, lamented in a tweet that the deaths had become political,” and
“repeated the study’s findings that 3,000 more people died on the island
after the hurricane than during comparable periods.” Rubio tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=034-b01&t=c>,
“Both Fed & local gov made mistakes. We all need to stop the blame game &
focus on recovery, helping those still hurting & fixing the mistakes.”

        The Washington Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=035-60a&t=c>
(9/13, Ferrechio) reports Speaker Ryan “said on Thursday he doesn’t doubt
the latest death toll figures from the impact of Hurricane Maria on Puerto
Rico, but stressed the storm caused the tragedy, not...Trump.” USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=036-f5d&t=c>
(9/13, Gaudiano) quotes Ryan as saying, “You couldn’t get to people for a
long time on the island because roads were washed out, power was gone and
the casualties mounted for a long time. ... So I have no reason to dispute
those numbers. Those are just the facts of what happens when a horrible
hurricane hits an isolated place like an island.” Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=037-0fb&t=c>
(9/13, Cornwell) notes Ryan also said, “Casualties don’t make a person look
bad.”

        *In Emails, First Responders Recount Finding “Mass Graves” In
Puerto Rico. *Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=038-fa5&t=c>
(9/13, Wilhelm) reports “emails released Thursday by congressional
Democrats show correspondence between first responders that appears to
undermine the Trump administration’s public reporting of the human toll
from Hurricane Maria last year.” For example, “in one email, dated Sept.
29, 2017, a first responder – whose name has been redacted – describes
‘finding mass graves in mud slide areas,’ and requests counseling support
for federal first responders in the area.” Politico adds “the emails were
released as part of a call from Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) for a full
congressional investigation into the aftermath of Hurricane Maria and
federal government’s response to the disaster.”
Florence Begins Lashing Carolina Coast.

As the southeastern coast of the US began to feel the early impacts of
Hurricane Florence Thursday night, the storm received extensive media
coverage – including more than 16 minutes reporting on the network news
broadcasts Thursday evening and heavy print and online coverage this
morning. Coverage focuses almost exclusively on potential for flooding due
to storm surges, estimates of rainfall totals, and predictions on how long
it will take to restore power and other services when the storm passes.
President Trump tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=039-5d5&t=c>
Thursday morning, “I was just briefed on Hurricane Florence. FEMA, First
Responders and Law Enforcement are supplied and ready. We are with
you! https://www.fema.gov/hurricane-florence
…
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=03a-1c2&t=c>”

        ABC World News Tonight
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=03b-d27&t=c>
(9/13, lead story, 3:00, Muir) reported in its lead story that a track from
the National Weather Service showed the storm “slowing down, which means it
will sit here and pound the coast, dangerous winds and several feet of
rain.” The storm is “also growing in size. ... This hurricane is 500 miles
wide.” In its lead story, NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender.
Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=03c-01e&t=c>
(9/13, lead story, 1:05, Holt) reported from along the Cape Fear River in
Wilmington, North Carolina that the “monster storm” was “already lashing
the Carolina coast even as the hurricane’s powerful eye [was] still hours
away from landfall.” NBC (Roker) reported wind gusts of 64 miles per hour
and said, “We’re looking at storm surges from seven to one 11 feet. We’re
talking about anywhere from ten to 20 inches of rain, some places getting
40 inches and what we have to worry about, the possibility of tornadoes. We
have a tornado watch up for the next several hours.” In another story for NBC
Nightly News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=03d-a29&t=c>
(9/13, story 3, 0:50, Holt), Lester Holt described “significant flooding as
the rivers swell from the storm surge.”’

        Reporting from Radio Island, North Carolina, which is about 100
miles northeast, Gadi Schwartz said on NBC Nightly News[image: Image
removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=03e-db6&t=c>
(9/13, story 2, 1:00, Holt) that winds were “gusting 50 to 70 miles an hour
but tonight, they are going to get up into the 100 mile an hour plus and
it’s going to coincide with the storm surge. We’re going to see a high tide
at around 11:30. The storm surge is expected to come up significantly 7.5
feet.” On the CBS Evening News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=03f-959&t=c>
(9/13, story 2, 1:10, Glor), Mark Strassman reported on storm surge on
North Carolina’s Outer Banks.

        An AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=040-255&t=c>
(9/14, Drew) story posted around 9 p.m. Thursday said “Florence’s leading
edge battered the Carolina coast Thursday, bending trees and shooting
frothy sea water over streets on the Outer Banks, as the hulking storm
closed in with 100 mph (155 kph) winds for a drenching siege that could
last all weekend. Tens of thousands were without power.” According to
forecasters, “conditions will only get more lethal as the storm smashes
ashore early Friday near the North Carolina-South Carolina line and crawls
slowly inland.” The AP Adds that while the storm “was downgraded from a
terrifying Category 4 to a 2,” North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D) warned:
“Don’t relax, don’t get complacent. Stay on guard. This is a powerful storm
that can kill. Today the threat becomes a reality.”

        In a story posted at 10 p.m., the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=041-62f&t=c>
(9/13, Samenow) called Thursday “the beginning of a prolonged assault from
wind and water,” and predicted that conditions would “deteriorate through
Thursday night: Winds will further accelerate, the rain will intensify,
rivers will swell, and the angry, agitated ocean will surge ashore.”
According to the National Weather Service, “nearly 5 million people could
witness at least 10 inches of rain over the next five days as the
slow-moving storm made little headway.” Reporting from Snead’s Ferry, North
Carolina, Victor Oquendo said on ABC World News Tonight[image: Image
removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=042-737&t=c>
(9/13, story 2, 0:45, Muir), “We’re bracing for potentially catastrophic
storm surge, possibly up to 11 feet. ... Emergency officials tell me they
are expecting an unprecedented amount of rain, possibly up to three feet,
and they say if you live in this area and you haven’t evacuated, that
window has closed.”

        Meteorologist Megan Glaros said on the CBS Evening News[image:
Image removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=043-242&t=c>
(9/13, story 3, 1:50, Glor), “The problem is it may meander long enough
that we have impacts of hurricane force for a long time, potentially here
through Saturday. It will not leave that area for quite some time.”

        A USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=044-940&t=c>
(9/13, Bacon, Gross) story posted Thursday night reported, “Federal
Emergency Management Agency administrator Brock Long urged people in
mandatory evacuation areas to get out. And he warned that the storm cleanup
will take time and patience.” The CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by
sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=045-e26&t=c>
(9/13, lead story, 1:55, Glor) reported in its lead story, “Tens of
thousands of homes and businesses have already lost power. That number
could climb into the millions.” David Muir said on ABC World News
Tonight[image:
Image removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=046-cfd&t=c>
(9/13, story 3, 4:05, Muir), “Authorities are telling residents here to
prepare for days without power. Perhaps weeks. They also fear the hurricane
could flood some 16 nuclear reactors across three states.”

        Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=047-024&t=c>
(9/13, Scheyder, Paperny) reports, “North Carolina will see up to eight
months of rain in a two- to three-day period, National Weather Service
forecaster Brandon Locklear said in a video briefing.” According to the
state’s emergency management agency, “at least 88,000 people were without
power in North Carolina with the brunt of the storm yet to come,” and
“millions of people were expected to lose power from the storm.”
Restoration “could take weeks.” Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=048-8ed&t=c>
(9/13, Sullivan) reports, “The total bill for damage from Florence could
eventually reach $10 billion to $20 billion, said Chuck Watson, a disaster
researcher at Enki Research in Savannah, Georgia.”

        *Some Nursing Homes Evacuate While Others Shelter In Place. *The CBS
Evening News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=049-785&t=c>
(9/13, story 6, 1:45, Glor) reported, “Up and down the coast, hospitals and
nursing homes in Florence’s path are being evacuated. Health officials are
determined not to repeat some of the mistakes made in past hurricanes
here.” On ABC World News Tonight
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=04a-27e&t=c>
(9/13, story 5, 1:45, Muir), Tom Llamas reported that at the Davis
Community Nursing Home And Assisted Living Facility in Wilmington, North
Carolina, “some 600 residents, staff and their families are sheltering in
place.” Charles Long, CEO, The Davis Community: “Those people who are
critical care, it would be difficult for us to move them hours away.”
Llamas: “Medical professionals...do not want a repeat of scenes like these
in Texas during Hurricane Harvey. And in Florida, nearly 150 evacuated from
this sweltering nursing home that lost power during Hurricane Irma. Twelve
of its residents lost their lives.”

        *Florence Could Increase Pork Prices. *USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=04b-e1e&t=c>
(9/13, Meyer) reports considers the effect Hurricane Florence will have on
the price of pork because North Carolina, the nation’s second-largest hog
producer, is in its path. While there is “concern that extreme weather
could kill enough animals to impact supply.” if the hogs “remain unharmed –
in some cases, farmers have relocated them – the issue then becomes how
soon after the hurricane the area’s slaughterhouses can re-open. Otherwise,
the animals can get too big and produce too much meat.”

        *Many Homes In Florence’s Path Lack Flood Insurance. *The Wall
Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=04c-f49&t=c>
(9/13, Scism, Jones, Bauerlein) reports in a front page story that concerns
about Florence are exacerbated by the recent development in the area and
residents’ lack of sufficient insurance. While much of the population and
development growth has been near the coast, fewer homeowners have flood
insurance now than five years ago.

        *Avlon: Trump Climate Policy Could Cause 80,000 Deaths Per Decade. *
Breitbart
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=04d-ecd&t=c>
(9/13, Baker) reports political analyst John Avlon “weighed in on” the
President’s “complicity with hurricanes” during a “Reality Check” segment
for CNN’s New Day
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=04e-467&t=c>.
Avlon contends that if the US continues to ignore climate science, “the
cost of lives and dollars will escalate.” Avlon said, “On the same day
Trump was discussing [Hurricane] Florence, his EPA proposed rolling back
restrictions on emissions of methane. That’s just the latest environmental
policy targeted by the Trump administration.” Avlon “went on to note how
two Harvard scientists claimed Trump’s policies and getting the country out
of the Paris Climate Agreement could lead to 80,000 deaths every decade.”

        *Hannity Blasts WPost For Saying Trump Is “Complicit” In Hurricane.
*Sean Hannity said on Fox News’ Hannity[image: Image removed by sender.
Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=04f-97d&t=c>
(9/13), “Sadly we have people in this country on the left, they are trying
to make the storm a political issue, if you can believe that. Some
literally blaming President Trump for the extreme weather. Like he had
control over a hurricane. The editorial board over at the Washington Post
literally claiming that Trump is complicit in causing the hurricane. You
cannot make this up, because of his ‘efforts to dismantle environmental
protections’ that caused the hurricane. The left won’t give President Trump
credit for the booming economy or moving towards energy independence or the
progress with North Korea, and no missiles over Japan or the victory over
ISIS, or tax cuts or so much more, but somehow they want you to believe
that he is responsible for mother nature.”
Foreign Policy
Trump: Kerry Held “Illegal Meetings” With “Very Hostile Iranian Regime.”

President Trump tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=050-ca0&t=c>
on Thursday, “John Kerry had illegal meetings with the very hostile Iranian
Regime, which can only serve to undercut our great work to the detriment of
the American people. He told them to wait out the Trump Administration! Was
he registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act? BAD!”

        Fox News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=051-d2d&t=c>
(9/13, Pappas) reports Kerry is “being slammed for conducting shadow
diplomacy with Iran after admitting to multiple meetings with Iranian
officials behind the backs of Trump administration officials – including
over the scrapped nuclear deal.” An Administration official “on Thursday
told Fox News Kerry’s meetings are ‘shameful,’ pointing out what
Iranian-backed militias are doing to kill and injure people in Syria, Iraq
and Yemen,” while other Republicans “suggested it may not even be legal.”

        The Washington Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=052-e0a&t=c>
(9/13, Gehrke) reports a “senior State Department official” also warned
Kerry on Thursday that he should not try to undermine Trump’s Iran strategy
“through his own outreach to the regime.” Assistant Secretary of State for
Economic Affairs Manisha Singh told a House panel, “I don’t have personal
knowledge of those meetings, but, if that is happening, again, I would find
it very inappropriate.” According to the Examiner, Kerry “has confirmed in
recent days that he has met ‘three or four times’ with Iranian Foreign
Minister Javad Zarif since leaving office.”

        *Iran Crude Exports To China Slow. *Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=053-605&t=c>
(9/13, Lee) reports Iran dispatched two supertankers of crude oil to China
on Wednesday, the first such shipments in 18 days, according to Bloomberg
data. The period was the “longest gap without sending oil to its biggest
customer in at least three years as imminent US sanctions pile pressure
onto Tehran.” While the “pause in shipments probably doesn’t mean China
will to bow to pressure” from the Administration, it “might indicate that
the Asian country’s refineries want better terms for Iranian cargoes.”

        *Iranian Revolutionary Guard Leader: Missile Attack On Kurdish Base
In Iraq A “Warning.” *Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=054-23a&t=c>
(9/13, Hafezi) reports Major Gen. Mohammad Ali Jafari, the chief of Iran’s
elite Revolutionary Guards Corps, “said on Thursday that Tehran’s missile
attack on an Iranian Kurdish rebel base in northern Iraq last week was a
warning to hostile powers, Iranian state television reported.” The IRGC
“fired seven missiles at the headquarters of the Democratic Party of
Iranian Kurdistan (PDKI), an armed opposition group that fights for greater
autonomy for Iran’s Kurdish community,” and Iranian media reported 11
people were killed. Jafari said, “The attack against the terrorists in
Iraq’s Kurdistan conveys a message to the enemies, particularly those
superpowers who think they can impose their evil plots on Iran and bully
us.”
Syrian Rebels Confident US Assistance Will Allow Them To Prolong Civil War.

Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=055-c31&t=c>
(9/13, Al-Khalidi) reports that Colonel Muhanad al Talaa, identified as a
“commander of the Pentagon-backed Maghawir al Thawra group,” said Thursday
that “rare military exercises with US marines in southern Syria sent a
strong message to Russia and Iran that the Americans and the rebels intend
to stay and confront any threats to their presence.” According to Reuters,
the “live-fire air and ground assault” exercises “involv[ed] hundreds of US
troops and rebel fighters.” A “US military spokesman said the exercises
were a show of force and that the Pentagon had notified Moscow through
‘deconfliction’ channels to prevent ‘miscommunication or escalate
tension.’”

        The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=056-c94&t=c>
(9/13, Karam) reports that “the Syrian army, backed by allies Iran and
Russia, is preparing for a military offensive to retake the country’s last
major rebel stronghold – the province of Idlib.” Fox News’ Special
Report[image:
Image removed by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=057-fdf&t=c>
(9/13) reported Turkey is sending military reinforcements to bolster its
positions inside “Syria’s last rebel bastion of Idlib,” while the US is
warning Russia it will be responsible for the resulting humanitarian crisis
in Syria if the Russia-backed Syrian military attacks the province. Turkish
Defense Minister Hulusi Akar is “still talking with Russia and Iran to try
to prevent” the Syrian government offensive.
Kushner Defends Actions Against Palestinians, Says It’ll Help Peace Deal.

The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=058-3d6&t=c>
(9/13, Landler) reports that three days after the Administration “evicted
the Palestine Liberation Organization from its offices in Washington, Jared
Kushner defended the latest in a string of punitive actions against the
Palestinians and insisted that none of them had diminished the chances of a
peace accord between Israel and the Palestinians.” In an interview
Thursday, Kushner “said President Trump had actually improved the chances
for peace by stripping away the ‘false realities’ that surround Middle East
peacemaking.” Said Kushner, “There were too many false realities that were
created — that people worship — that I think needed to be changed. All
we’re doing is dealing with things as we see them and not being scared out
of doing the right thing. I think, as a result, you have a much higher
chance of actually achieving a real peace.”
Treasury Department Sanctions Two North Korean-Backed IT Companies.

The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=059-cd8&t=c>
(9/13, Pennington) reports the Administration “blacklisted two North
Korean-controlled information technology companies based in China and
Russia on Thursday as it pushed for progress by Kim Jong Un’s government on
denuclearization.” The Treasury Department announced it “was designating
China Silver Star, its North Korean CEO Jong Song Hwa, and its Russia-based
sister company, Volasys Silver Star.” Treasury Secretary Mnuchin said “the
sanctions were intended to stop the flow of illicit revenue to North Korea
from overseas IT workers hiding behind front companies and aliases.”

        The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=05a-9ec&t=c>
(9/13, Talley) reports the Treasury Department says the two IT companies
are directed by North Koreans, and provide Pyongyang with millions of
dollars of hard currency contrary to international sanctions. Said Mnuchin,
“These actions are intended to stop the flow of illicit revenue to North
Korea from overseas information technology workers disguising their true
identities and hiding behind front companies, aliases, and third-party
nationals.” Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=05b-1dc&t=c>
(9/13, Ahmann, Wroughton) reports Mnuchin warned companies “to take
precautions to ensure that they are not unwittingly employing North Korean
workers for technology projects.”

        *South Korea Accepted Shipments From North Korea In Violation Of UN
Sanctions. *The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=05c-662&t=c>
(9/13, Jeong) reports South Korean ports accepted seven coal shipments and
one shipment of pig iron from North Korea, including three shipments made
after US intelligence warnings that North Korea was seeking to export coal
in violation of UN sanctions. Analysts said while the violation was not
intentional, it exposes some of the loopholes in the sanctions regime.

        *North Korea’s “Mass Games” Rely On Child Labor. *Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=05d-81d&t=c>
(9/13, Smith) reports, “Packed into Pyongyang’s giant stadium this week
with thousands of other tourists, Australian Mitchell Hamilton marvelled at
the return of North Korea’s ‘Mass Games,’ a huge pageant that has produced
some of the most iconic images of the isolated country.” Hamilton said, “My
thought sitting there was that it was a show fit for a god. You can’t help
but get swept up in the spectacle.” Reuters adds that a “sobering reminder
of the power of the state in North Korea, however, was the realisation that
many of the thousands of performers on the field were young children.”
State Dept. Official: US Prepared To Impose Additional Sanctions On Russia.

Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=05e-942&t=c>
(9/13, Zengerle, Wroughton) reports that members of Congress have “kept up
their push for the Trump administration to push back harder against
Russia’s ‘nefarious activities.’” On Thursday, Assistant Secretary of State
Manisha Singh “reiterated to a congressional hearing that Washington would
adhere to its August pledge to impose ‘very severe’ sanctions on Russia if
it does not meet a November deadline to comply with international chemical
weapons law.” Testifying before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Singh
said, “We are looking at this November deadline as absolutely, we plan to
impose a very severe second round of sanctions under the (chemical and
biological weapons law).” However, according to Reuters, Singh “noted
Russia would not be subject to sanctions if it meets conditions including
allowing inspections and providing a ‘verifiable’ assurance that they will
not use nerve agents against their own people again.”

        *Media Analyses: Alibi Offered By Russians Suspected In UK
Poisoning Improbable. *Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=05f-51b&t=c>
(9/13, Osborn) reports that “two Russians resembling men Britain accuses of
jetting to England to try to murder a former spy said on Thursday that they
were innocent tourists who had flown to London for fun and visited the city
of Salisbury to see its cathedral.” UK officials countered that “it was
clear the two men, who appeared on Russia’s state-funded RT television
station, were agents of Russia’s GRU military intelligence who carried out
the attack, and called their interview an example of ‘obfuscation and
lies.’” Reuters goes on to report that the two “appeared acutely ill at
ease,” and “identified themselves as Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov,
the names British prosecutors said were used by the poisoners.”

        The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=060-ca0&t=c>
(9/13, Higgins) reports that in the RT interview, the two “insisted they
were simple tourists who had traveled to the ‘wonderful’ English city of
Salisbury to look at its cathedral spire and 14th-century clock.” However,
the Times says neither of them “offer[ed] any explanation for how the
London hotel room they had stayed in came to have traces of Novichok, the
military-grade nerve agent that Britain says was used in the Salisbury
attack. Nor did they explain why two sports nutritionists would travel all
the way to Britain on March 2, make two trips to Salisbury on consecutive
days, and then fly back to Moscow on the evening of March 4, just hours
after the attack on the Skripals.”
US, Cuban Officials Discuss Mysterious Attacks On Diplomats In Havana.

The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=061-eea&t=c>
(9/13, Lee) reports that as “American authorities search for answers into
mysterious ‘health attacks’ that began two years ago in Havana,” US and
Cuban officials on Thursday “renewed efforts to determine the method and
motive behind incidents that have left some diplomats with brain injuries.”
Cuba’s foreign ministry “said nine members of the scientific team it
assembled to look into the incidents met with US lawmakers and the National
Academy of Sciences before the talks” at the State Department on Thursday.
The State Department said the meeting is “part of our ongoing effort to
investigate and better understand the health conditions of our diplomats,”
but “did not offer additional details.”

        The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=062-776&t=c>
(9/13, Harris), however, reports that “some of Cuba’s top scientists and
medical specialists denounced on Thursday claims that two dozen American
diplomats in Havana had been the targets of mysterious attacks over the
last two years.” The experts were “careful not to offer a definitive
explanation for the episodes,” but they “complained that the United States
had concluded, with no evidence, that an attack had been carried out to
start.”
Trudeau Says He Wants Trade Deal; Kudlow Says Dairy Disagreements Key Issue.

Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=063-e37&t=c>
(9/13, Ljunggren) reports Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said
Thursday “he wanted a good NAFTA deal as soon as possible, but did not
answer directly when asked if he agreed with Washington that the end of
September was the final deadline for talks.” Asked by reporters whether he
felt that the end of September was the final deadline, Trudeau said, “We
have seen various deadlines put forward as markers to work for,” adding,
“We’ll do the work and try and get there as quick as we can, but we’re
going to make sure that we’re doing what is necessary to get the right deal
for Canadians.”

        KOLD-TV
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=064-67b&t=c>
Tucson, AZ (9/13, 6:36 a.m. MST), meanwhile, reported that NEC Director
Kudlow weighed in on the trade talks with Canada, saying that “the talks
could be summed up in a four letter word.” Kudlow: “All I got to say is, as
I’ve said many times with Canada, the US would like a deal but the obstacle
is a four letter word, M-I-L-K, ok? M-I-L-K. And if we can get through milk
and dairy, where some of these tariffs are 300%, probably that would
advance the cause.”

        *Trump Says He Wants To Rebrand NAFTA As “USMC.” *The Washington
Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=065-3b3&t=c>
(9/13, Higgins) reports President Trump has said that he “wants to rebrand
the North American Free Trade Agreement as the United States-Mexico-Canada
agreement or USMC for short, but may limit it to just the USM pact if he
cannot reach an agreement with Canada regarding the deal he negotiated with
Mexico.” The Examiner says Trump spoke about his views “during a private
meeting with a small group of Republican donors.” The Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=066-19e&t=c>
(9/13, Bender) covers Trump’s remarks in an article titled, “Trump Plans To
Rebrand Nafta, Warns Canada.”

        *Trump: US “Under No Pressure To Make A Deal With China.” *Trump
tweeted
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=067-6f2&t=c>
yesterday morning, “The Wall Street Journal has it wrong, we are under no
pressure to make a deal with China, they are under pressure to make a deal
with us. Our markets are surging, theirs are collapsing. We will soon be
taking in Billions in Tariffs & making products at home. If we meet, we
meet?” The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=068-00e&t=c>
(9/13, Lynch) says the tweet “is consistent with his recent bravado toward
China, but it could make Chinese leaders dubious that Trump will be willing
to negotiate a deal.” A front-page Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=069-4b8&t=c>
(9/13, A1, Lynch) analysis says Trump’s statement “sought to downplay any
hope that the United States would extend a hand toward reconciling the
trade conflict, amid word that Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin had
invited Chinese officials to return to talks.” The Post says Trump’s “view
that the Chinese are suffering while the US thrives helps explain his
confidence that Beijing ultimately will buckle. But the president’s
expectation that financial hardship will prompt Chinese President Xi
Jinping to cave in a fresh round of diplomatic talks is misplaced, analysts
said.”

        *WSJournal: New iPhones Made To Appeal To Chinese Buyers. *The Wall
Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=06a-2ef&t=c>
(9/13, Kubota, Mickle) reports that the latest iPhones revealed Wednesday
by Apple included features aimed at appealing to China consumers as the
company seeks to expand its sales in the country. However, the Journal says
Chinese rivals already offer similar features at a cheaper price point.

        *ECB: Trade War With US Is Slowing Economic Growth In Europe. *The New
York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=06b-37c&t=c>
(9/12, Ewing, Tsang) reports that due to the ongoing “trade war” with the
US, “European factories are producing fewer goods, automobile exports are
plunging and surveys show that business managers around the Continent are
nervous.” The Times adds, “Soon, that will have a measurable impact on
economic growth across the region. At least, that is what the European
Central Bank expects.” According to the Times, the ECB has “lowered its
projections for economic growth across the 19-nation euro area, and warned
that any potential escalation of the dispute — which threatens to ensnare
the European automotive industry – could create further headaches.”

        *Secret Service Buying Harley-Davidsons, Despite Trump’s Calls For
Boycott. *CQ Roll Call
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=06c-38b&t=c>
(9/13, Tully-McManus) reports that the Secret Service “is still buying
Harley-Davidson motorcycles,” even though Trump “has supported a boycott of
Harleys if the company moves some motorcycle production overseas.” The
Secret Service earlier this week posted their intention to purchase a
Harley-Davidson motorcycle “on a website for businesses who contract with
the federal government.” The Secret Service’s “justification for the
purchase says that choosing another make and model would cost thousands of
dollars,” because their technicians are trained on the Harley-Davidson
bikes.
Domestic Policy
Stumping In Ohio, Obama Says Midterms Can Return “Sanity To Our Politics.”

The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=06d-13f&t=c>
(9/13, Smyth) reports that President Obama “delivered a simple message
Thursday headed into the fall midterm elections: Vote. Speaking to an
enthusiastic crowd of several thousand in Cleveland, Obama said the
consequences of sitting on the sidelines during November’s midterm
elections ‘are far more dangerous’ than in the past. Without mentioning
Republican President Donald Trump by name, Obama said, ‘This is not normal
what we’re seeing. It is radical.’” He added, “On November 6th, we have a
chance to restore some sanity to our politics. We can flip the balance of
power back to the American people. Because you are the only check on bad
policy, you are the only real check on abuses of power. It’s you and your
vote.”

        The Cincinnati Enquirer
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=06e-1b1&t=c>
(9/13, Balmert) reports that during his appearance in Cleveland, Obama
“showed why he might be the Democrats’ biggest asset this fall, drumming up
enthusiasm by condemning fearmongering from Republicans, chastising
apathetic voters,” and praising ex-federal consumer watchdog agency chief
Richard Cordray (D-OH), who is battling state Attorney General Mike DeWine
(R-OH) in this fall’s race to succeed term-limited Gov. John Kasich (R-OH).
Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=06f-0d7&t=c>
(9/13, Strauss) reported that Obama “took thinly veiled shots at...Trump
and congressional Republicans, saying they’re taking too much credit for
the country’s low unemployment rate.” Obama repeatedly “referred to
Republicans as ‘leaders just yakking and yakking every day.’”

        The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=070-16e&t=c>
(9/13, Sonmez) reports that Obama “ridiculed Republicans” during the event,
“mocking members of the party for being ‘still mad’ even though they
control the White House and both chambers of Congress. ... ‘Even the folks
who won don’t seem happy. Have you noticed that?’ Obama” said, “decrying
the country’s ‘broken’ politics. Republicans won the presidency, House and
Senate, he said, but ‘they’re still mad, which is interesting.’ He went on
to criticize the ‘forces of retrenchment and backlash and anger’ as well as
‘some media outlets that like to do the fanning,’ without naming any
names.”

        *USA Today’s Bovard: Obama Presidency Fueled Current Distrust Of
Washington. *Columnist James Bovard writes in USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=071-843&t=c>
(9/13) writes that Obama’s return to campaign politics with “a blistering
attack on the Trump administration” is “akin to the kid who killed his
parents and then sought mercy from the judge because he was an orphan.”
Bovard argues that while Obama declared “cynicism” the biggest threat to
democracy and called for “a restoration of honesty and decency and
lawfulness in our government,” his “eight years as president fueled the
distrust of Washington that Obama now condemns.” Obama, Brovard writes,
“has never admitted how his policies made the federal government more
dangerous at home and abroad. Nothing that Trump can do or say should be
permitted to expunge Obama’s derelictions.”

        *Cuomo Trounces Nixon In Democratic Primary. *As expected, Gov.
Andrew Cuomo (D) on Thursday demolished
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=072-087&t=c>
actress Cynthia Nixon (D) 66%-34% in New York’s Democratic gubernatorial
primary. The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=073-2ef&t=c>
(9/13, Smyth) reports that Cuomo thwarted Nixon’s “attempt to become the
latest insurgent liberal to knock off an establishment Democrat.” The New
York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=074-c1e&t=c>
(9/13, Goldmacher) reports, “The race cemented both Mr. Cuomo’s standing as
an unmatched force in New York politics and a merciless tactician with
little regard for diplomacy.” USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=075-7b0&t=c>
(9/13) reports that Cuomo’s “big victory allows him to continue his bid for
a third term and sets up a” general election matchup against Dutchess
County Executive Marc Molinaro (R), who was unopposed in Thursday’s GOP
primary. Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=076-71e&t=c>
(9/13, Allen) reports that Cuomo is a “heavy favorite” to win reelection.
The New York Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=077-622&t=c>
(9/13, Fredericks, Gonen), the Huffington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=078-999&t=c>
(9/13, Marans), the Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=079-756&t=c>
(9/13, Vielkind), and The Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=07a-e6b&t=c>
(9/13, Wilson) are among the media that also report on the primary result.
Feinstein Refers Letter To FBI Alleging Sexual Misconduct By Kavanaugh In
High School.

In the latest twist in the partisan free-for-all regarding Judge Brett
Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination, Sen. Dianne Feinstein said yesterday
she has referred allegations about the judge to the FBI. As the Los Angeles
Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=07b-c67&t=c>
(9/13, Haberkorn) points out, however, “anyone can make a referral to the
FBI,” and Feinstein’s action “does not mean Kavanaugh is under federal
investigation.” Meanwhile, BuzzFeed News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=07c-439&t=c>
(9/13, Villa, McLeod) cites “a source” who confirms “there is no criminal
investigation into the” matter, the AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=07d-b21&t=c>
(9/13, Mascaro) says that “an FBI spokeswoman declined to comment,” and NBC
Nightly News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=07e-9c1&t=c>
(9/13, story 12, 1:30, Holt) – the only major network newscast to report
the story – that the Bureau is “confirming they included the information in
the background file.”

        The Intercept
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=07f-0d0&t=c>
(9/12, Grimm) was first to note the emerging story Wednesday evening,
reporting that “Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee” had “privately
requested to view” the “Kavanaugh-related document in possession
of...Feinstein,” who had “so far refused.” The “specific content of the
document, which is a letter from a California constituent, is unclear,” but
“one consistent theme” among mostly conflicting sources “was that it
describes an incident involving Kavanaugh and a woman while they were in
high school.” The Intercept also reported that “the woman who is the
subject of the letter is now being represented by Debra Katz, a
whistleblower attorney who works with #MeToo survivors.” According to The
Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=080-e41&t=c>
(9/13, Carney), “over the past two days Feinstein has declined to answer
questions from reporters on Capitol Hill” about the letter.

        Citing “a person familiar with the matter,” the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=081-d62&t=c>
(9/13, Viebeck) reports “the letter describes an alleged episode of sexual
misconduct involving Kavanaugh when he was in high school.” It was “relayed
to Feinstein by Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.), the person said.” The New York
Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=082-17e&t=c>
(9/13, Edmondson, Fandos) cites “two officials familiar with the matter”
who also “say the incident involved possible sexual misconduct
between...Kavanaugh and a woman when they were both in high school.” In a
curiously worded sentence, the Times adds “the information came in a
letter, which...included the allegation of sexual misconduct toward the
letter’s author, a person familiar with the letter confirmed.” The New York
Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=083-05e&t=c>
(9/13, Fredericks) points out that “Kavanaugh attended Georgetown
Preparatory School, an all-boys Jesuit high school in Maryland,” and that
“it was unclear what school the letter writer attended.”

        BuzzFeed News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=084-757&t=c>
(9/13, Villa, McLeod) says it “contacted the woman believed to be the
subject of the letter at her home last week,” and “she declined to
comment.” BuzzFeed adds that “the lawyer believed to be representing the
woman was seen leaving Capitol Hill Wednesday evening shortly after the
Intercept story dropped and just as Judiciary Committee Democrats were
huddling in the Senate lobby.” Katz “has not confirmed that she is
representing the woman.”

        CNN
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=085-62e&t=c>
(9/13, De Vogue, Barrett) reported that Feinstein released a statement
reading, “I have received information from an individual concerning the
nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. That individual
strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the
matter further, and I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred
the matter to federal investigative authorities.” Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=086-302&t=c>
(9/13, Litvan, Stohr) says Feinstein’s “bare-bones statement added an
element of mystery,” while Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=087-8ec&t=c>
(9/13, Everett, Dovere) calls “the mysterious letter” the “latest twist in
a charged partisan fight over the nominee’s background and documents
regarding his history,” and the Los Angeles Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=088-b8f&t=c>
(9/13, Haberkorn) calls it “the latest blow in the partisan and bitter
battle over President Trump’s nominee.” The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=089-717&t=c>
(9/13, Swoyer), Washington Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=08a-5f7&t=c>
(9/13, Quinn), CQ Roll Call
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=08b-d81&t=c>
(9/13, Ruger), Daily Caller
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=08c-942&t=c>
(9/13, Daley) and Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=08d-918&t=c>
(9/13, Kendall), among other news outlets, report the story along similar
lines.

        The New York Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=08e-c54&t=c>
(9/13, Fredericks) reports “the White House issued a furious
response.” The Washington
Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=08f-297&t=c>
(9/13, Donachie) notes that White House spokesperson Kerri Kupec said,
“Throughout his confirmation process, Judge Kavanaugh has had 65 meetings
with senators – including with Sen. Feinstein – sat through over 30 hours
of testimony, addressed over 2,000 questions in a public setting and
additional questions in a confidential session. Not until the eve of his
confirmation has Sen. Feinstein or anyone raised the specter of new
‘information’ about him.” Kupec also said, “Throughout 25 years of public
service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has thoroughly and repeatedly
vetted Judge Kavanaugh, dating back to 1993, for some of the most highly
sensitive roles. ... Sen. [Chuck] Schumer promised to ‘oppose Judge
Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have,’ and it appears he is
delivering with this 11th hour attempt to delay his confirmation.”

        The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=090-b26&t=c>
(9/13, Viebeck) notes, meanwhile, that Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn
“dismissed the issue on Twitter
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=091-915&t=c>,”
writing, “Let me get this straight: this is [a] statement about [a] secret
letter regarding a secret matter and an unidentified person. Right. ... I
will add: the FBI already performed and has reported on a background
investigation on the nominee and this has been made available to all
Senators on the Judiciary Committee.”

        The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=092-06e&t=c>
(9/13, Edmondson, Fandos) reports that “Carrie Severino, chief counsel and
policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network, the conservative group
pressing for...Kavanaugh’s confirmation, condemned Ms. Feinstein’s action,”
saying, “This has all the indicators of an 11th hour character
assassination and a desperate attempt to delay and defeat the nomination of
Judge Kavanaugh, who has a sterling reputation in his community, his
profession, his church and among hundreds of friends, colleagues and
co-workers.” Along similar lines, in an editorial, the Wall Street Journal
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=093-e1d&t=c>
(9/13) casts the allegations as a smear born of Democrats’ desperation out
of their inability to derail the nomination.

        Charles Hurt of the Washington Times said on Fox News’ Special
Report
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=094-795&t=c>
(9/13), “I guess in a weird way we shouldn’t be surprised because I feel
like Democrats have trotted out every single possible strategy that they
could come up with to block this nomination and this is just sort of this
strangest and I think probably, the most desperate. I have a hard time
seeing how it is effective at doing anything other than alienating
independent voters that might otherwise be interested in the Democratic
Party.”

        Matthew Continetti of the Washington Free Beacon said on Fox News’
Special Report
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=095-653&t=c>
(9/13), “I think the Democrats’ strategy has been clear since day one when
they began interrupting the hearings. They want to delay the vote. They
want to delay this nomination, hopefully, from their point of view, past
the election. Then if the Democrats have a good election, then they can
say, we delayed him to this point, we just won the election, we shouldn’t
seat him at all. This has been the strategy from day one.”

        Sean Hannity said on Fox News’ Hannity[image: Image removed by
sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=096-8fb&t=c>
(9/13), “Two sources are telling Fox that Senator Feinstein has known about
these decades old allegation since July. She has met with him. She has had
chances to confront him about this publicly, and now because nothing has
stuck, she is beginning to throw this in at the final hour.”

        *Kavanaugh Vote Scheduled To Allow Him To Join Court Before New
Term Begins October 1. *USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=097-4ef&t=c>
(9/13, Wolf) reports “Committee chairman Chuck Grassley scheduled a
confirmation vote” for Kavanaugh for “next Thursday, Sept. 20, which would
leave time for a full Senate vote before the court’s new term begins Oct.
1.” Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=098-7cc&t=c>
(9/13, Hurley, Becker) says “Trump’s fellow Republicans control the Senate
by a narrow margin,” and “with no sign yet of any Republicans planning to
vote against Kavanaugh, he seems poised to win confirmation despite
Democratic opposition.” The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=099-154&t=c>
(9/13, Kim) notes “the Judiciary Committee voted 11 to 10 on Thursday to
hold the vote at 1:45 p.m. on Sept. 20, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch
McConnell...is expected to set full Senate votes on Kavanaugh’s
confirmation for the final week of September.” The vote “occurred as
Democrats complained about the confirmation process and pressed for more
documents from...Trump’s nominee.”

        *Group Urges DOJ To Investigate Attempted “Bribery” For Collins’
Vote. *USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=09a-49d&t=c>
(9/13, Hayes) reports “a watchdog group is asking the Justice Department to
investigate a number of groups they say may be illegally pressuring Sen.
Susan Collins to gain her vote against...Kavanaugh.” Collins “says she sees
the effort – an online crowdfunding effort by groups that threaten to use
the money against Collins if she votes for Kavanaugh – as an attempt to
bribe her for the vote.” USA Today adds that “the online crowdfunding
campaign by three activists groups” has “raised concerns of bribery.” The
Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT) “told USA TODAY it is
sending a letter to the Justice Department on Thursday asking it
investigate the groups, which have raised more than $1.2 million to go to
Collins’ opponent if she votes to appoint Kavanaugh.”

        Bradley Smith, chairman of the Institute for Free Speech and a
former Republican chairman of the Federal Election Commission, writes in
the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=09b-f23&t=c>
(9/13, Smith) that “legalities aside, the Crowdpac campaign is jarring for
its ‘vote our way or else’ tone,” but “what should be reassuring, however –
regardless of how one feels about Kavanaugh – is that it has almost no
chance of succeeding.” Collins “is highly unlikely to change her vote
because of these fundraising threats,” and “for those who tell us money is
the root of all political evil, that should be an encouraging result.”

        *Leahy: Kavanaugh “Misled The Senate” Under Oath. *Sen. Pat Leahy
writes in the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=09c-547&t=c>
(9/13), “Last week I uncovered new evidence that...Kavanaugh misled the
Senate during his earlier hearings for the DC Circuit Court by minimizing
and even denying his involvement in Bush-era controversies. I gave him the
opportunity to correct his testimony at his hearing last week; he chose
instead to double down.” While “I make no claim that Kavanaugh is a bad
person...he repeatedly misled the Senate when the truth might have placed
that job out of reach.”

        In his Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=09d-536&t=c>
(9/13, Gerson) column, Michael Gerson writes, “A surefire ideological
Kool-Aid test? Those who think...Kavanaugh was wounded during his hearings
have heavily imbibed.” Adds Gerson, “It is simply not credible to hold
Kavanaugh responsible for the offense of replacing the Supreme Court’s
swing vote. It is not credible to hold Kavanaugh responsible for the shabby
treatment that President Barack Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland received.
And it is not credible to impose a pro-choice litmus test on the nominee of
a pro-life president.” Kavanaugh “is the best of his judicial peers; he is
better than his senatorial accusers; and, if there is any justice, he is
headed for confirmation.”

        *Nomination Fight Has Sparked More Than 16,200 Ads. *USA Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=09e-2b9&t=c>
(9/13, Collins, Schouten) reports “groups trying to sway the Senate’s vote
on...Kavanaugh have run more than 16,200 ads clamoring for his confirmation
or defeat, nearly five times the advertising that confronted Neil Gorsuch.”
USA Today adds that “the advertising frenzy illustrates the intensity of
the brawl over his nomination and the shadow it could cast over midterm
elections, now less than two months away.”

        *Justice Thomas Appears To Mock Booker Over “Spartacus” Comment. *The
Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=09f-4eb&t=c>
(9/13, Swoyer) reports “Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas last week
mocked” Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), “who claimed to be ‘Spartacus’ by
revealing confidential records during...Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing.”
The Times adds that “in a clip released by CSPAN, Leonard Leo, vice
president of the Federalist Society, questioned...Thomas during an event in
Texas hosted by his organization about how to preserve the legitimacy of
the Supreme Court and civil society.” To laughter and cheers, Thomas said,
“Honorable – if we could use that word about more people who are in public
life, people who actually ask the questions at confirmation hearings
instead of Spartacus.”
Manafort Reportedly Has Tentatively Agreed To Plea Deal.

ABC World News Tonight
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0a0-af5&t=c>
(9/13, story 8, 0:25, Muir) briefly reported that former Trump campaign
chairman Paul Manafort “has tentatively agreed to a plea deal in order to
avoid a second trial. He met today for more than four hours with Special
Counsel Robert Mueller’s team.” The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0a1-21f&t=c>
(9/13, Schmidt, Haberman, Lafraniere) reports, “It was not clear which
charges Mr. Manafort might plead guilty to or whether he would cooperate
with Mr. Mueller’s team in its investigation into Russian interference in
the 2016 election, possible collusion with the Trump campaign and
obstruction of justice” by the President.

        Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0a2-539&t=c>
(9/13, Samuelsohn, Gerstein) reports that in an interview, Rudy Giuliani
said, “From our perspective, we want him to do the right thing for himself.
There’s no fear that Paul Manafort would cooperate against the President
because there’s nothing to cooperate about, and we long ago evaluated him
as an honorable man.” The Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0a3-628&t=c>
(9/13, Mordock) also reports on Giuliani’s comments to Politico.

        Jeffrey Toobin said on CNN’s Situation Room[image: Image removed by
sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0a4-fbf&t=c>
(9/13), “Cooperation usually is the case. Frankly, given Manafort’s lack of
leverage at this point, I think prosecutors would almost certainly insist
on it. ... To give him any sort of deal, they are going to have to get
something in return. The only thing he could really offer at this point is
cooperation.”

        *Manafort Case Spotlights Foreign Lobbying Law. *The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0a5-153&t=c>
(9/13, Lafraniere) reports that the Manafort case “has put a spotlight on
the foreign lobbying law, known as FARA. Once viewed by lobbyists as an
outdated statute that could be evaded with little consequence, it has now
been applied aggressively in a number of high-profile criminal cases. ...
In the five decades before Mr. Manafort was indicted last year, only seven
people had been criminally charged with violating the statute.” But “now,
almost entirely stemming” from Mueller’s work, “the law has become a
prominent prosecution tool.”

        *Wray: Russia Spreading “Disinformation,” “Propaganda” Before
Midterms. *In an interview shown on CBS This Morning[image: Image removed
by sender. Video]
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0a6-97f&t=c>
(9/13), FBI Director Wray was asked if Russian President Vladimir Putin is
“lying” when he claims his government “has never interfered and is not
going to interfere in American affairs, including the election process.”
Wray responded, “I’m not going to accuse somebody of lying. I’ll just say
that doesn’t jive with our read of the evidence, and we’re pretty confident
in our read.” Asked what Russia is “doing to disrupt the midterms,” Wray
said, “What we’re seeing now is a continuation of the what we call the
‘malign foreign influence’ efforts. What they do is sow both inaccurate
information – disinformation, a kind of information warfare – and then
propaganda, exaggerated half-truths, distortions.”

        *WPost Editorial Urges Congress To Act Against Russian Election
Meddling. *A Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0a7-b3e&t=c>
(9/13) editorial welcomes Trump’s executive order this week “promising to
punish anyone attempting to meddle in US elections,” which it calls a
“warning shot against Russia and other foreign adversaries.” Still, the
Post says the executive order is “insufficient,” and calls on Congress to
also act. The Post notes that “there are two bipartisan Senate proposals
that, if passed, would send a stronger message” by insisting on “tougher
automatic sanctions.” Congress, the Post says, “should step in to send a
clear message to the world: Any nation seeking to interfere in US elections
will pay a price.”

        *Zuckerberg : Facebook Now “Better Prepared” To Combat Election
Interference. *The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0a8-540&t=c>
(9/13, Frenkel, Isaac) reports that in a blog post this week, Facebook CEO
Mark Zuckerberg said his company has taken many steps to combat election
interference. He wrote, “In 2016, we were not prepared for the coordinated
information operations we now regularly face. But we have learned a lot
since then and have developed sophisticated systems that combine technology
and people to prevent election interference on our services. Today,
Facebook is better prepared for these kinds of attacks.”

        *Starr Says Trump Should Not Criticize Mueller. *Ken Starr said on Fox
News’ Special Report
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0a9-79a&t=c>
(9/13), “I think Bob Mueller, from everything I’ve seen, is doing what he
needs to do. I know he’s under a lot of criticism including from the
President. I wish the President would not do that. I don’t think the
President is helping his cause. ... This President has seen fit to just put
his chin out there and lay it out on the line. I think it’s a tactical
blunder.”

        *In Op-Ed, Avenatti Argues For Indicting Trump. *In an op-ed for
the New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0aa-75f&t=c>
(9/13), Stormy Daniels’ attorney Michael Avenatti argues that it is time to
test the question of whether a sitting President can be indicted by
bringing an indictment against Trump that can be reviewed by the Supreme
Court. Avenatti writes that if there is “sufficient evidence to support an
indictment of President Trump...the special counsel, Robert Mueller, who is
investigating possible Russian interference in the 2016 election, and
prosecutors from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern
District of New York, who are investigating payments to my client, Stormy
Daniels, and Karen McDougal, should present their evidence to grand
juries,” who “should then determine whether the evidence supports an
indictment of Mr. Trump.” Avenatti adds that if Judge Brett Kavanaugh is
confirmed to the Supreme Court and if an indictment of Trump were to make
it before the court, his recusal should be mandatory.

        *Avenatti, Tucker Carlson Trade Jabs In Contentious Interview. *During
a contentious interview Thursday evening, Avenatti and Fox News’ Tucker
Carlson “sparred” as they discussed Daniels’ alleged extramarital affair
with President Trump, the Washington Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0ab-506&t=c>
(9/13, Correll) reports. Avenatti questioned why Carlson, who has referred
to him as a “creepy porn lawyer” did not “use a similar term for Trump.”
During the interview, Fox News displayed such as “Tucker takes on creepy
porn lawyer” and “Does America want creepy porn lawyer as pres?” The
interview, can be seen here: (1
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0ac-1b9&t=c>,
2
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0ad-99b&t=c>).

        *Texas Notary Who Mishandled Daniels’ Agreement With Trump
Suspended. *The Dallas Morning News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0ae-cdf&t=c>
(9/13, Moffeit, Reporter) reports the Texas Secretary of State’s office has
“suspended a suburban Dallas notary for botching her role in Stormy
Daniels’ agreement to stay silent about her alleged affair with President
Donald Trump.” The move faults the notary “for not properly witnessing and
documenting the porn star’s’ signature on the agreement struck with Trump’s
personal attorney just days before the presidential election, according to
records obtained Wednesday by The Dallas Morning News.”
Republicans Agree To Postpone Debate Over Border Wall Until After Midterms.

The Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0af-081&t=c>
(9/13, Werner) reports that “Congressional leaders from both parties have
finalized a plan to avert a government shutdown at the end of the month
over President Trump’s demands to fund a border wall, and postpone that
fight until after the November midterm elections.” The Post adds that “the
bipartisan pact, announced on Thursday by Appropriations Committee Chairman
Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-NJ), reflects the desire of Republican leaders to
avoid a nasty shutdown fight weeks before the midterm elections – even if
it means sacrificing, at least for now, one of Trump’s most prominent
policy goals.” The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0b0-b01&t=c>
(9/13, Daly) similarly reports “the stopgap bill would not address...Donald
Trump’s long-promised wall,” which “GOP leaders have said they prefer to
resolve the issue after the Nov. 6 elections.” The AP notes Senate Majority
Leader McConnell said last week, “We still are in favor of the wall, we
still want to get funding for the wall, but we think the best time to have
that discussion is after the election.”

        Bloomberg News
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0b1-bd3&t=c>
(9/13, Wasson) indicates that “by attaching the bills to the stopgap,
lawmakers are forcing Trump to accept the bills as they are or cause a
partial government shutdown on Oct. 1.” Bloomberg notes that last week, the
President said “he’d like to shut down the government to force Democrats to
fund a wall along the Mexican border but likely won’t do it before the Nov.
6 congressional elections.” The Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0b2-141&t=c>
(9/13, Elis) notes “the wall’s funding is part of the Department of
Homeland Security bill, which is included in the CR, meaning Trump would
also have to veto the defense bill if he wanted to make good on his
threat.” CQ Roll Call
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0b3-b23&t=c>
(9/13, Lesniewski), the Washington Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0b4-ab2&t=c>
(9/13, Sherfinski) and Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0b5-ba2&t=c>
(9/13, Ferris), among other news outlets, also report the story this
morning.

        *Administration Agrees To Allow Immigrant Families Denied Asylum To
Apply Again. *Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0b6-939&t=c>
(9/13, Hals) reports that the Administration “has agreed to reconsider the
asylum claims of some 1,000 immigrant parents and children who were
separated at the US border as part of a deal to settle lawsuits over his
‘zero-tolerance’ immigration policy.” According to Reuters, “The
settlement, detailed in court documents late on Wednesday, represented a
victory for rights groups that challenged Trump’s contentious family
separation policy that was aimed at deterring illegal immigration.” If the
settlement is approved, “immigrant parents and their children will get a
second chance to apply for asylum even if US authorities previously
rejected their claims that they faced a ‘credible fear of persecution or
torture’ if sent back to their home countries.” Politico
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0b7-7ee&t=c>
(9/13, Hesson) also says that “if the judge approves the agreement, he
likely would lift a temporary restraining order he issued in mid-August
that prohibited the federal government from deporting families separated at
the border.”

        *Gillibrand Says Her Call To Abolish ICE Was Misconstrued. *The Daily
Caller
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0b8-466&t=c>
(9/13, Prince) reports that Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) said that her
calls to abolish ICE were misunderstood. Gillibrand claimed that although
she said, “We need to abolish ICE,” she “believes America still needs an
agency that will fulfill the goals that ICE was created to achieve.”
Gillibrand said that ICE has deviated from its intended responsibilities
and that the agency in its current form should be eliminated and replaced
with a new agency that serves the same mission of enforcing immigration
laws and investigating criminal activity by foreign nationals residing in
the US.
House Panel Votes To Make Trump Tax Cuts Permanent.

Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0b9-c8e&t=c>
(9/13, Morgan) reports “a Republican-led panel in the US House of
Representatives voted on Thursday to make permanent individual tax cuts
from President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax overhaul, a move widely seen as a
partisan ploy to help Republican candidates in the Nov. 6 congressional
elections.” Reuters adds “members of the tax-writing House Ways and Means
Committee voted 21-15 along party lines to send the measure to the House
floor for a full chamber vote expected by Oct 1.” The Hill
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0ba-890&t=c>
(9/13, Jagoda) also says the bill “is expected to get a vote on the House
floor later this month but isn’t expected to be taken up by the Senate,
where it would need 60 votes to pass.” The AP
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0bb-603&t=c>
(9/13, Gordon) similarly indicates “prospects for the measure, which
Democrats unanimously oppose, are dim in the Senate.”
Sessions Urges US Attorneys To Resist “Unconstitutional” Nationwide
Injunctions.

The Washington Examiner
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0bc-191&t=c>
(9/13, Cohen) reports Attorney General Sessions “is telling Justice
Department lawyers to push back against federal judges who have imposed
nationwide injunctions against many of the Trump administration’s
policies.” Sessions wrote in a memo to US Attorney Offices, “A number of
such injunctions in recent years have brought to the fore the problem of
judges acting outside the bounds of their authority and granting relief
that reaches far beyond the confines of the particular case or controversy
before them. ... Consistent with the longstanding position of the Executive
Branch under Administrations of both parties, the Department of Justice
opposes the issuance of such nationwide injunctions.”

        Reuters
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0bd-3de&t=c>
(9/13, Lynch) notes that in a speech yesterday in Missouri, Sessions
“revealed he was issuing new litigation guidance that he said would ‘assist
our Department attorneys in fighting unconstitutional orders’ all the way
to the US Supreme Court.” Reuters adds “the new guidelines call on Justice
Department litigators to fight back against cases that involve nationwide
injunctions.”
NLRB Moves To Make Challenging Workplace Labor Practices More Difficult.

The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0be-3a5&t=c>
(9/13, Scheiber) reports that the NLRB, after having been “forced to
retreat from an effort to make challenging labor practices harder in many
workplaces,” is “moving to achieve the goal through other means.” On
Thursday, the board announced “that it was set to publish a proposed rule
redefining a company’s responsibility under labor law for workers engaged
at arm’s length, such as those hired by contractors or franchisees.” The
proposal, which reverses an Obama-era action, “would make it less likely
that a company in such a situation would be deemed a joint employer liable
for labor abuses like firing workers seeking to unionize.”
Cancer Research
ACA Increased Insurance Coverage For Those With Head, Neck Cancer.

MedPage Today
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0bf-658&t=c>
(9/13, Hlavinka) reports the Affordable Care Act increased insurance
coverage rates among patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer,
according to a population-based study
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0c0-45e&t=c>
published in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. The researcher found
that “in states that adopted the 2014 Medicaid expansion, the number of
uninsured HNSCC patients dropped by 50%, and the proportions of these
patients both privately insured and enrolled in Medicaid increased.” The
researchers “looked at data from tumor registries in 18 areas from the
National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results
(SEER) program, and sampled a total of 89,038 patients.”
Boehringer Ingelheim To Buy ViraTherapeutics In Deal For Cancer-Killing
Viruses.

Forbes
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0c1-10b&t=c>
(9/13, Weintraub) reports Boehringer Ingelheim announced that it plans to
acquire Austria-based ViraTherapeutics for €210 million ($244 million),
“becoming the third major company this year to bag technology based around
cancer-killing viruses.” Forbes explains that until this year,
“Cancer-killing viruses...hadn’t generated quite as much excitement as
other types of immuno-therapy, like CAR-T engineered immune cells and
checkpoint-inhibiting drugs.”
Editorials/Op-Eds
New York Times.

*“The Catholic Church’s Unholy Stain.”* The New York Times
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0c2-28b&t=c>
(9/13) says in an editorial that Pope Francis’ summoning of senior bishops
from around the world “to address the crisis of clerical pedophilia” is
“long overdue, and the outcome cannot be yet more apologies and pledges of
better behavior.” The revelations “demand radical, public, convincing
systemic change.” The Times says Pope Francis “has made strides in changing
the culture of the papacy and in making the Catholic Church more inclusive,
and he seems now to have grasped the gravity of the sickness afflicting the
church.” Now, “he will need to look beyond the cardinals, prelates and
priests — indeed beyond himself — for answers and solutions.”
Washington Post.

*“The Economy Is Doing Well. Who Deserves The Credit?”* In an editorial,
the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0c3-722&t=c>
(9/13) says both President Trump and former President Obama have taken
credit for the current strength of the economy, and “each has a point. The
growing economy represents the acceleration of a trend that began in Mr.
Obama’s first presidential term.” Trump, “therefore, inherited a tightening
labor market, good for workers. However, it stands to reason that the
massive new tax cuts and spending increases he signed into law reheated the
already warmed-up economy. So give Mr. Trump that much credit.” The Post
adds, however that Trump and Republicans “must also own the potential
costs. Despite GOP promises that lower taxes would pay for themselves in
higher growth, federal revenue has gone up only 1 percent so far this year,
according to the Congressional Budget Office.”

        *“Trump Fires A Warning Shut At Russia. Congress Should Provide
Backup.” *A Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0c4-3de&t=c>
(9/13) editorial welcomes President Trump’s executive order this week
“promising to punish anyone attempting to meddle in US elections,” which it
calls a “warning shot against Russia and other foreign adversaries.” Still,
the Post says the executive order is “insufficient,” and calls on Congress
to also act. The Post notes that “there are two bipartisan Senate proposals
that, if passed, would send a stronger message” by insisting on “tougher
automatic sanctions.” Congress, the Post says, “should step in to send a
clear message to the world: Any nation seeking to interfere in US elections
will pay a price.”

        *“A Reformer Survives A Tough Rhode Island Primary. More Should
Follow Her Example.” *In an editorial, the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0c5-62b&t=c>
(9/13) praises Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo (D), who this week defeated
a serious primary challenge. Before she became governor, Raimondo served as
state Treasurer, where she “spearheaded a comprehensive pension reform
proposal to rescue Rhode Island’s badly underfunded state plans.” The plan
“froze annual cost-of-living increases for retirees while moving employees
to a new system that combined a defined-benefit program with a 401(k)-like
plan to which employees contributed.” The Post says Raimondo’s “career thus
far, bolstered by her decisive victory Wednesday, teaches an important
lesson for politicians of all parties: Asking constituents to sacrifice for
the long-term public good is not an electoral death sentence, at least not
if the reform is shaped and led with professionalism, fairness, honesty and
respect for all sides.”

        *Zakaria: Suppressing Bannon Will Make His Ideas More Potent. *Fareed
Zakaria writes in the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0c6-2d6&t=c>
(9/13) that while some argue that since Steve Bannon left the
Administration he is “simply unimportant and irrelevant and thus shouldn’t
be given a microphone.” But media organizations that “have recently sought
to feature Bannon know he is an intelligent and influential ideologist, a
man who built the largest media platform for the new right, ran Trump’s
successful campaign before serving in the White House, and continues to
articulate and energize the populism that’s been on the rise throughout the
Western world.” Zakaria adds that the fear among many on the left is that
Bannon’s ideas, “some of which can reasonably be described as evoking white
nationalism, will prove seductive and persuasive to too many people,” and
therefore they do not want to give him a platform. Zakaria argues, however,
that “by trying to suppress Bannon and others on the right, liberals are
likely making their ideas seem more potent.”

        *Ignatius: Kerry Memoir A Reminder Of Benefits Of Telling One’s
Story Honestly. *David Ignatius writes in the Washington Post
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0c7-9d3&t=c>
(9/13) casts former Secretary of State John Kerry’s memoir, “Every Day Is
Extra,” as a “study of a politician’s character, and how it was shaped by
personal and political difficulty.” Kerry, Ignatius writes, “emerges in
these pages as a man who’s strong enough not to worry that in telling the
truth about himself, he might look weak.” Ignatius recounts several
anecdotes from the memoir and concludes that “if you’re living in
‘Crazytown’ (as Bob Woodward’s book described Trump’s Washington), Kerry’s
book is a reminder of the benefits of sanity, self-knowledge and the
willingness to tell your own story honestly.”

*Copyright 2018 by Bulletin Intelligence LLC* Reproduction or
redistribution without permission prohibited. Content is drawn from
thousands of newspapers, national magazines, national and local television
programs, radio broadcasts, social-media platforms and additional forms of
open-source data. Sources for Bulletin Intelligence audience-size estimates
include Scarborough, GfK MRI, comScore, Nielsen, and the Audit Bureau of
Circulation. Data from and access to third party social media platforms,
including but not limited to Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and others, is
subject to the respective platform’s terms of use. Services that include
Factiva content are governed by Factiva’s terms of use
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0c8-f94&t=c>.
Services including embedded Tweets are also subject to Twitter for
Website's information and privacy policies
<http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2018091401biden&r=email-fdd3&l=0c9-52e&t=c>.
The Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing is published five
days a week by Bulletin Intelligence, which creates custom briefings for
government and corporate leaders. We can be found on the Web at
BulletinIntelligence.com, or called at (703) 483-6100