Subject: [big campaign] FW: Statement from Leading Health Care Experts On Misleading AHIP Report
From: Adam Jentleson <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:04:01 -0400
List-Id: <bigcampaign.googlegroups.com>

In addition to PWC backing away<http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/10/13/pricewaterhousecoopers-backpaddling/> from the AHIP study, here's a statement from seven leading health care experts saying the report is "not credible."

http://www.americanprogress.org/pressroom/statements/2009/10/misleading_ahip_report.html
________________________________
From: Adam Jentleson [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 10:40 AM
To: Jason Rahlan
Subject: Statement from Leading Health Care Experts On Misleading AHIP Report

For Immediate Release
October 13, 2009

Contact
Adam Jentleson, 202.481.8156
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>

Statement from Leading Health Care Experts On Misleading AHIP Report

Recently America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) released a study that claims the reform plan being developed by the Senate Finance Committee would dramatically raise the cost of health insurance. We believe the study is flawed and that the results are not credible.

The AHIP study is misleading in several ways. First, it ignores critical elements of the insurance market reforms in the Senate Finance Committee bill that would protect people from many of the problems AHIP purports to analyze; it would grandfather existing coverage, provide reinsurance and risk-adjustment, and introduce special policies for young adults. More importantly, the AHIP study ignores the many provisions in the Senate Finance Committee's reform plan that would help to streamline medical care delivery and reduce its cost, including changes in payment methods, provisions to encourage use of information technology and comparative effectiveness, and the establishment of insurance exchanges to lower the administrative costs associated with health insurance. In fact, one of the policies that AHIP criticizes, the imposition of taxes on 'Cadillac health plans' would, in the view of most economists, be a powerful force to reduce the cost of health care. Finally, it is important to note that most of the spending in the draft legislation will go for subsidies that directly lower the cost of health insurance for families and individuals with low or modest income. The report simply ignores this massive source of savings for millions of American households.

Important issues are at stake in health reform. There is ample room for legitimate debate. But responsible participants in that debate should avoid selective use of evidence and try to preserve analytic balance.

Henry J. Aaron, Brookings Institution

David Cutler, Harvard University

Judy Feder, Georgetown University, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress

Elliott S. Fisher, Dartmouth Medical School

Arnold Milstein, Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine

Len Nichols, New America Foundation

Meredith Rosenthal, Harvard University

###

If you would rather not receive future communications from Center for American Progress, let us know by clicking here.<http://PROGRESS.pr-optout.com/OptOut.aspx?513917x24389x0x1x0x24000x6&Email=JRahlan%40americanprogress.org>
Center for American Progress, 1333 H St. NW, Washington, DC 20005-4707 United States

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "big campaign" group.

To post to this group, send to [email-masked]

To unsubscribe, send email to [email-masked]

E-mail [email-masked] with questions or concerns
 
This is a list of individuals. It is not affiliated with any group or organization.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---