Subject: [big campaign] True Colors: GOPers Cheer Victory For Big Corporations
From: Adam Jentleson <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:05:10 -0500
List-Id: <bigcampaign.googlegroups.com>

GOP Is Overjoyed At The Unprecedented Influence Corporations Will Now Have In Federal Campaigns<http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/21/gop-citizens-united/>

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/21/gop-citizens-united/

During the 2008 presidential campaign, the conservative group Citizens United<http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2009/08/12/dollars-spenders/> made a movie critical of Hillary Clinton but was barred from distributing it on local cable systems because federal courts said it "looked and sounded like a long campaign ad<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100121/ap_on_bi_ge/us_supreme_court_campaign_finance;_ylt=Au_sYpM_ofiycEX778MXw9eyFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTMyZjIzOGJmBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMTIxL3VzX3N1cHJlbWVfY291cnRfY2FtcGFpZ25fZmluYW5jZQRjcG9zAzIEcG9zAzgEc2VjA3luX3RvcF9zdG9yeQRzbGsDY291cnRlYXNlc2J1>, and therefore should be regulated like one." The Supreme Court then took up the case and in its much-anticipated decision, today ruled 5-4 to allow corporations and unions to spend unlimited funds<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/21/AR2010012101724.html> in support for, or opposition of, federal candidates. The monumental ruling throws out a "a 63-year-old law designed torestrain the influence of big business<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100121/ap_on_bi_ge/us_supreme_court_campaign_finance;_ylt=Au_sYpM_ofiycEX778MXw9eyFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTMyZjIzOGJmBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMTIxL3VzX3N1cHJlbWVfY291cnRfY2FtcGFpZ25fZmluYW5jZQRjcG9zAzIEcG9zAzgEc2VjA3luX3RvcF9zdG9yeQRzbGsDY291cnRlYXNlc2J1> and unions on elections.

One Republican attorney said that the new ruling basically turns the political landscape into the "Wild Wild West<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100121/ap_on_bi_ge/us_supreme_court_campaign_finance;_ylt=Au_sYpM_ofiycEX778MXw9eyFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTMyZjIzOGJmBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMTIxL3VzX3N1cHJlbWVfY291cnRfY2FtcGFpZ25fZmluYW5jZQRjcG9zAzIEcG9zAzgEc2VjA3luX3RvcF9zdG9yeQRzbGsDY291cnRlYXNlc2J1>." Another GOP election lawyer said that the ruling represents "a huge sea-change in campaign finance law. The Court went all the way. It reallyrelieves any restrictions on corporate spending<http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/01/gopers_chamber.php> on independent advertising."

As Common Cause noted, the ruling "will enhance the ability of the deepest-pocketed special interests<http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/01/21/free-speech-v-democracy-rounding-up-the-citizens-united-reactions/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wsj%2Flaw%2Ffeed+%28WSJ.com%3A+Law+Blog%29&utm_content=Twitter> to influence elections and the U.S. Congress." U.S. PIRG called it a "shocking burst of judicial activism" that treats corporations "in the same manner as ordinary citizens." Fred Wertheimer of Democracy 21 said the ruling will "create unprecedented opportunities for corporate 'influence-buying<http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0110/Statements_on_CU.html>' corruption."

The ruling is a giant win for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce<http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/01/gopers_chamber.php> and the big corporations, which tend to donate heavily to Republicans. Many Republicans have therefore come out and praised today's decision:

- Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX): "It is about a nonprofit group's ability to speak about the public issue. I can't think of a more fundamental First Amendment issue. ... [The ruling could] open up resources that have not previously been available [for Republicans]." [NYT<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/us/politics/09donate.html>]

- Rep. Steve King (R-IA): "The Constitution protects the rights of citizens and employers to express their viewpoints on political issues. Today's Supreme Court decision affirms the Bill of Rights and is a victory for liberty and free speech." [Statement]

- Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN): "If the freedom of speech means anything, it means protecting the right of private citizens to voice opposition or support for their elected representatives. The fact that the Court overturned a 20-year precedent speaks volumes about the importance of this issue." [Statement<http://www.gop.gov/press-release/10/01/21/pence-praises-supreme-court-decision>]

- Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY): The court took a step toward "restoring the First Amendment rights [of corporations and unions]. ... By previously denying this right, the government was picking winners and losers." [AP<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100121/ap_on_bi_ge/us_supreme_court_campaign_finance;_ylt=Au_sYpM_ofiycEX778MXw9eyFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTMyZjIzOGJmBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMTIxL3VzX3N1cHJlbWVfY291cnRfY2FtcGFpZ25fZmluYW5jZQRjcG9zAzIEcG9zAzgEc2VjA3luX3RvcF9zdG9yeQRzbGsDY291cnRlYXNlc2J1>]

- RNC Chairman Michael Steele: "Today's decision by the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. FEC, serves as an affirmation of the constitutional rights provided to Americans under the first amendment. Free speech strengthens our democracy." [Statement<http://www.gop.com/index.php/news/read/statement_from_rnc_chairman_michael_steele_on_supreme_court_decision/>]

- Senate Candidate Marco Rubio: "Today's SCOTUS decision on McCain-Feingold is a victory for free speech." [Statement<http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0110/Statements_on_CU.html>]

The Court's ruling also struck down part of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform legislation "that barred union<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100121/ap_on_bi_ge/us_supreme_court_campaign_finance;_ylt=Au_sYpM_ofiycEX778MXw9eyFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTMyZjIzOGJmBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwMTIxL3VzX3N1cHJlbWVfY291cnRfY2FtcGFpZ25fZmluYW5jZQRjcG9zAzIEcG9zAzgEc2VjA3luX3RvcF9zdG9yeQRzbGsDY291cnRlYXNlc2J1>- and corporate-paid issue ads in the closing days of election campaigns." Sen. Russ Feingold called the Court's ruling a "terrible mistake<http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/01/gopers_chamber.php>," but pointed out that it "does not affect McCain-Feingold's soft money ban, which will continue to prevent corporate contributions to the political parties from corrupting the political process." "The Supreme Court chose to roll back laws that have limited the role of corporate money in federal elections since Teddy Roosevelt was president," he said. Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) reacted similarly, saying he was "disappointed<http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31810.html>" in the decision.

-----
Adam Jentleson
Communications Director, Progressive Media
Center for American Progress Action Fund
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
ajentleson (AIM)
202-247-8614 (cell)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "big campaign" group.

To post to this group, send to [email-masked]

To unsubscribe, send email to [email-masked]

E-mail [email-masked] with questions or concerns
 
This is a list of individuals. It is not affiliated with any group or organization.