Subject: [big campaign] Lobbyists For Foreign Corporations Begin Fight To Ensure Foreign Money Can Influence American Elections
From: Adam Jentleson <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:32:17 -0500
List-Id: <bigcampaign.googlegroups.com>

Lobbyists For Foreign Corporations Begin Fight To Ensure Foreign Money Can Influence American Elections<http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/27/foreign-lobbying-elections/>

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/27/foreign-lobbying-elections/

 Foreign Cash<http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/foreign_exchange1.jpg>Last week, the 5-4 Supreme Court ruling in theCitizens United v. Federal Election Commission<http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/21/citizens-united/>decision invalidated a sixty-three year-old ban on corporate money in federal elections. The ruling gives corporations essentially the same rights<http://www.publicintegrity.org/articles/entry/1913/> as individuals in their ability to spend freely on political advertising, even if those advertisements explicitly advocate the election or defeat of a federal candidate. One consequence of this decision is that foreign corporations with U.S.-subsidiaries are likely to be able to now spend unlimited amounts on American elections.

Congressional Democrats, led by Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL), Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), are drafting legislation<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/22/AR2010012204811.html?hpid=topnews> to curb the influence of foreign corporations and foreign governments following the decision. However, the National Journal reported<http://www.nationaljournal.com/congressdaily/coa_20100127_3449.php> today that corporate lobbyists representing foreign corporations are already organizing to defeat such a proposal. The Organization for International Investment, a trade group representing foreign banks<http://www.ofii.org/memlist.htm>, oil companies, and other foreign corporations operating in the United States, "lashed out" at Van Hollen's proposals. "The concern over foreign influence in our political system is a red herring," said Nancy McLernon, the head of OII.

McLernon - who previously worked for<http://www.ofii.org/staff.htm> Citizens for a Sound Economy, a stealth "grassroots" corporate lobbying group now known<http://thinkprogress.org/2009/08/27/ahip-lobbying-publicoption/> as Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks - is wrong to assert that the danger of foreign lobbying is simply a distraction. For instance, Saudi Arabia has already signaled that the progressive effort to build a clean energy American economy is its "biggest threat<http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60N0YE20100124>":

Saudi Arabia's economy depends on oil exports so stands to be one of the biggest losers in any pact that curbs oil demand by penalizing carbon emissions. "It's one of the biggest threats that we are facing," said Muhammed al-Sabban, head of the Saudi delegation to U.N. talks on climate change and a senior economic adviser to the Saudi oil ministry.[...] Climate talks posed a bigger threat, Sabban said, and subsidies for the development of renewable energy were distorting market economics in the sector, he said.

Presumably because of the Citizens United ruling, Saudi Arabian-owned subsidiaries operating in the United States can now spend unlimited amounts advocating the defeat of candidates who support clean energy legislation. According to a ThinkProgress investigation<http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/13/foreign-oil-tea/>, foreign-oil backed lobbyists in America are already instigating efforts to kill clean energy legislation. Fortunately, President Obama isexpected<http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/32060.html> to address the issue of foreign corporations influencing American elections in his State of the Union address tonight.

-----
Adam Jentleson
Communications Director, Progressive Media
Center for American Progress Action Fund
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
ajentleson (AIM)
202-247-8614 (cell)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "big campaign" group.

To post to this group, send to [email-masked]

To unsubscribe, send email to [email-masked]

E-mail [email-masked] with questions or concerns
 
This is a list of individuals. It is not affiliated with any group or organization.