Subject: H4A News Clips 7.4.15
From: Alexandria Phillips <[email-masked]>
To: Alexandria Phillips <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 09:01:28 -0400
List-Id: <HRCRapid.hillaryclinton.com>

*H4A News Clips*

*July 4, 2015*

*TODAY’S KEY
STORIES.....................................................................................
4*

Hillary Clinton Warns That a Republican President Would Repeat the Health
Law // NYT // Maggie Haberman – July 3,
2015........................................................................................................
4

Clinton says she hopes Iran talks yield a deal // Reuters // Sandra Maler –
July 3, 2015............ 6

*SOCIAL
MEDIA..................................................................................................
7*

Paul Steinhauser (7/3/15, 3:50 PM) – 2016 News: @HillaryClinton campaign
says Dartmouth puts Hanover #NH rally crowd size at 850 people #nhpolitics
#fitn............................................................... 7

Amy Chozick (7/3/15, 6:25 PM) – Hillary responds to Bernie burn: “I always
knew this was gonna be competitive.” (Excellent pooling
@rubycramer)......................................................................
7

Zeke Miller (7/3/15, 6:35 PM) – Pool: @HillaryClinton after being served
her ice cream. “is that for me?” she said. “Holy
shamoley.”...........................................................................................................
7

*HRC NATIONAL
COVERAGE..............................................................................
7*

Clinton warns that a Republican president would repeal Obamacare // WaPo //
Philip Rucker – July 3,
2015.............................................................................................................................................
7

Clinton: I hope Iran deal can be reached // Politico // Annie Karni – July
4, 2015...................... 8

Bill and Hillary Clinton fight new demand for email server // Politico //
Josh Gerstein – July 3, 2015          9

Hillary Clinton: ‘I take a backseat to no one’ on liberal record //
Politico // Annie Karni – July 3, 2015        11

Hillary Clinton: I hope Iran deal can be reached // Politico // Annie Karni
– July 3, 2015......... 13

Hillary steps up liberal rhetoric as Sanders surges in polls // AP // July
3, 2015....................... 13

Hillary: “I Take A Backseat To No One” At “Fighting For Progressive Values”
// Buzzfeed // Katherine Miller – July 3,
2015..........................................................................................................................
16

Hillary Clinton Hopeful For Iran Nuclear Deal Next Week // TIME // Zeke J.
Miller – July 3, 2015               17

Hillary Clinton: Electing Republican President Would Mean Repeal of
Obamacare // NBC // Phil Helsel – July 3,
2015.................................................................................................................................
18

Hillary Clinton Not Fazed by Bernie Sanders’ Crowds // ABC // Liz Kreutz –
July 3, 2015......... 19

Richard Nixon Biographer: Hillary Clinton Has ‘Nixonian Attributes’ // ABC
// Rick Klein – July 3, 2015   20

Dems have to take White House to keep Obamacare, Clinton warns // Boston
Herald // Chris Cassidy – July 3,
2015.....................................................................................................................................
21

In House, liberals side with Clinton over Sanders // The Hill // Mike
Lillis – July 3, 2015......... 21

Hillary Clinton to head back to Iowa // The Hill // Ben Kamisar – July 3,
2015........................ 24

Inside Hillary Clinton’s evolution from Girl Scout to presidential
frontrunner // Business Insider // Melia Robinson – July 3,
2015........................................................................................................
25

Judicial Watch: Obama and Hillary Clinton Concocted Benghazi Video Lie with
Jihadist Help // Breitbart // Edwin Mora – July 3,
2015....................................................................................................
27

Why was Cherie so keen to open doors for a billionaire sheikh’s wife? //
Daily Mail // Guy Adams – July 3,
2015............................................................................................................................................
29

*OTHER DEMOCRATS NATIONAL
COVERAGE................................................. 33*

*DECLARED.................................................................................................
33*

*O’MALLEY...............................................................................................
33*

O’Malley jabs at GOP-led Congress in Newton // Des Moines Register // Grant
Rodgers – July 3, 2015       33

*SANDERS.................................................................................................
34*

Bernie Sanders’s Revolutionary Roots Were Nurtured in ‘60s Vermont // NYT
// Sarah Lyall – July 3,
2015............................................................................................................................................
35

Bernie Sanders seen as a ‘protest candidate,’ says Democratic rival Martin
O’Malley // WaPo // John Wagner – July 3,
2015.......................................................................................................................
38

Bernie who? // Politico // Gabriel Debenedetti – July 3,
2015................................................. 39

AFL-CIO leader tries to quell pro-Sanders revolt // Politico // Brian
Mahoney – July 3, 2015.... 41

Is Bernie Sanders Too Radical for America? // HuffPo /// Peter Dreier –
July 3, 2015............... 43

The real reasons Bernie Sanders is transforming the election: Here’s why he
galvanizes the left // Salon // Sophia Tesfaye – July 3,
2015................................................................................................
48

Bernie Sanders out-greens Hillary Clinton: Will she be able to hold her own
in a climate hawk runoff // Salon // Lindsay Abrams – July 3,
2015..........................................................................................
51

‘Grassroots movement working’: Bernie Sanders gains on the Clinton machine
// Guardian // Lauren Gambino and Ben Jacobs – July 3,
2015...............................................................................................
53

A.B. Stoddard: Clinton’s feeling the Bern // The Hill // A.B. Stoddard –
July 3, 2015............... 56

Bernie Sanders raises $15 million. Chump change or a lot? // CS Monitor //
Peter Grier – July 3, 2015         58

Sanders says he has a ‘strong chance of winning Iowa’ // Radio Iowa // O.
Kay Henderson – July 3, 2015  59

*WEBB......................................................................................................
60*

Jim Webb’s Facebook engagement rivals Pataki’s // CBS // July 3,
2015................................. 60

Jim Webb tests the limits of a maverick’s appeal // MSNBC // Alex
Seitz-Wald – July 3, 2015.. 61

Jim Webb Throws His Hat in the Ring for the WH // Fox // Clint Henderson –
July 3, 2015..... 64

Fifth Democrats elbows way into prez race // Boston Herald // Bob McGovern
– July 3, 2015.. 65

*CHAFEE...................................................................................................
66*

Democrats in New Hampshire find some of Chafee’s ideas ‘odd’ // AP //
Michelle R. Smith – July 3, 2015 66

*UNDECLARED............................................................................................
68*

*BIDEN......................................................................................................
68*

Will Joe Biden run for president? Drumbeat picks up. // CS Monitor // Linda
Feldmann – July 3, 2015      68

Will Joe Biden Run For President in 2016 After All? One Prominent
Fundraiser Thinks So // Bustle // Chris Tognotti – July 3,
2015.........................................................................................................
70

*OTHER.....................................................................................................
71*

*GOP..................................................................................................................
71*

*DECLARED..................................................................................................
71*

*BUSH........................................................................................................
71*

Jeb Bush Needs Some New Economic Advice // NYT // Editorial Board – July 3,
2015............. 72

Jeb Bush to meet with Mitt Romney in Kennebunkport // WaPo // Philip Rucker
– July 3, 2015 73

Jeb Bush raises questions about Obama’s Iran negotiations // Reuters //
Steve Holland – July 2, 2015     73

Don’t Trust Iran // Town Hall // Jeb Bush – July 2,
2015........................................................ 73

*RUBIO......................................................................................................
75*

Marco Rubio’s Donor Obstacles: A Limited Base and Another Floridian // NYT
// Jeremy W. Peters and Ashley Parker – July 3,
2015.............................................................................................................
75

Sen. Marco Rubio To Campaign In Nevada // CBS // July 3,
2015............................................ 78

Marco Rubio on Trump: ‘Offensive’ and ‘Divisive’ Comments Are Not Offering
A Solution // Mediaite // Ken Meyer – July 3,
2015.............................................................................................................
78

*PAUL........................................................................................................
79*

Ron Paul says Trump troubles him // The Hill // Mark Hensch – July 3,
2015......................... 79

*CRUZ.......................................................................................................
80*

Ted Cruz continues to defend Donald Trump on immigration // WaPo // Katie
Zezima – July 3, 2015         80

Ted Cruz defends Donald Trump, slams ‘Washington cartel’ on immigration //
Politico // Ali Breland – July 3,
2015....................................................................................................................................
80

A Conservative Firebrand From The Start, Ted Cruz Always Had A Plan // NPR
// Ailsa Change – July 3,
2015............................................................................................................................................
81

Cruz: US should withdraw from UN Human Rights Commission // The Hill // Ben
Kamisar – July 3,
2015...........................................................................................................................................
83

Cruz owns mistakes, offers fresh insight // Houston Chronicle // Todd J.
Gillman – July 3, 2015 84

*CHRISTIE................................................................................................
86*

Exclusive: Chris Christie hires presidential campaign manager and appoints
senior staff // WaPo // Philip Rucker – July 3,
2015............................................................................................................
86

For Chris Christie, the truth hurts // USA Today // Windsor Mann – July 3,
2015.................... 90

Christie to spend the night at Romney’s New Hampshire home // The Hill //
Ben Kamisar – July 3, 2015 91

*PERRY.....................................................................................................
92*

Rick Perry wants to reach out to black people. He’ll have to do a lot
better. // WaPo // Paul Waldman – July 3,
2015.....................................................................................................................................
92

Rick Perry made a big speech on states’ rights and race. But his policies
don’t follow. // Vox // German Lopez – July 3,
2015..........................................................................................................................
94

Rick Perry: Trump Made ‘Huge Error,’ Painted Mexicans with Broad Brush //
Mediaite // Josh Feldman – July 3,
2015.................................................................................................................................
95

Rick Perry: GOP Has Ignored Black Vote For Too Long // Breitbart // Sarah
Rumpf – July 3, 2015 96

*GRAHAM................................................................................................
101*

Lindsey Graham tells Iowan: “I don’t want you to vote for me” // CBS //
Stephanie Condon – July 3, 2015 101

*HUCKABEE............................................................................................
101*

Presidential Candidate Mike Huckabee Uses Schizophrenia As A Slur, Gets It
Wrong // Forbes // Emily Willingham – July 3,
2015...................................................................................................
101

*JINDAL..................................................................................................
103*

Bobby Jindal Really, Really, Really Hates Gay Marriage // Mother Jones //
Kevin Drum – July 3, 2015     103

*TRUMP...................................................................................................
103*

Donald Trump’s Lousy Week (Except for the Polling) // NYT // Daniel Victor
– July 2, 2015... 103

Hispanic leaders want GOP field to condemn Trump’s ‘idiocy’ // AP // Steve
Peoples – July 3, 2015            105

Pataki’s Trump card: Using The Donald to get noticed in crowded GOP field
// CNN // Jeremy Diamond – July 3,
2015...............................................................................................................................
107

Jon Stewart Slams Donald Trump Supporters For Defending ‘Mexican Rapists’
Comments // HuffPo // Julia Bruccullieri – July 3,
2015...................................................................................................
108

Bernie Sanders Will End the IMF’s Economic Violence in Greece and Africa //
HuffPo // Robert Naiman – July 3,
2015...............................................................................................................................
109

Donald Trump again lambastes border security after a California woman is
killed // LA Times // Ryan Parker – July 3,
2015.........................................................................................................................
111

Donald Trump: Whose voters is he stealing // CS Monitor // Peter Grier –
July 3, 2015........... 113

*UNDECLARED...........................................................................................
114*

*WALKER................................................................................................
114*

In Scott Walker’s Wisconsin, Obama urges Crowd to Flee to Democrat-Run
paradise In Minnesota // Slate // Beth Ethier – July 3,
2015....................................................................................................
114

New York Times Debunked: Scott Walker’s ‘I’m Not Going Nativist’
Conversation Never Happened // Breitbart // Matthew Boyle – July 3,
2015...........................................................................................
115

*OTHER...................................................................................................
118*

Chris Christie and Marco Rubio Get Pajama Time at Matt Romney’s House //
NYT // Ashley Parker and Maggie Haberman – July 3,
2015.........................................................................................
118

Romney to host the Christies, Rubios at the New Hampshire home // WaPo //
Philip Rucker – July 3,
2015..........................................................................................................................................
120

Rubio, Christie planning sleepover with the Romneys // AP // Jill Colvin –
July 3, 2015........ 120

Romney to host Christie, Rubio in New Hampshire // Politico // Jennifer
Shutt – July 3, 2015 121

Rubio, Christie To Bunk At Mitt Romney’s New Hampshire B&B // Bloomberg //
Terrence Dopp – July 3,
2015..........................................................................................................................................
121

Romney to Host Rubio, Christie for July 4th // TIME // Zeke J. Miller –
July 3, 2015............... 123

*OTHER 2016
NEWS........................................................................................
123*

The unexpected rise of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump // WaPo // Kathleen
Parker – July 3, 2015        123

What candidates really mean when they invoke the ‘Founding Fathers’ // WaPo
// Andrew M. Shocket – July 3,
2015................................................................................................................................
125

Drawing voters in: Campaign logos bring artistic touch to politics // CNN
// Ashley Killough – July 3,
2015..........................................................................................................................................
127

Early fundraising totals could shape 2016 GOP field // The Hill // Ben
Kamisar – July 4, 2015 128

2016 Hopefuls Flood NH For July 4 // NBC // July 3,
2015..................................................... 131

Chris Christie and Hillary Clinton’s fake followers // Reuters // Lena
Masri – July 2, 2015...... 132

Crowded field: Presidential hopefuls end up marching in the same Foruth of
July parades // Washington Times // Jennifer Harper – July 3,
2015...............................................................................
132

*OPINIONS/EDITORIALS/BLOGS...................................................................
132*

Clinton and Obama are on the wrong side of history // WaPo // Dana Milbank
– July 3, 2015. 132

Her emails prove it, Hillary’s just like us // Boston Herald // Howie Carr
– July 3, 2015......... 134

Hillary Clinton’s private messages reveal the banality of email //
Independent // Alice Jones – July 3,
2015..........................................................................................................................................
135

If I were Hillary Clinton, I’d rather Cherie Blair just left me alone //
Guardian // Deborah Orr – July 3,
2015..........................................................................................................................................
137

*TOP
NEWS.....................................................................................................
139*

*DOMESTIC.................................................................................................
139*

Obama Plans Broader Use of Clemency to Free Nonviolent Drug Offenders //
NYT // Peter Baker – July 3,
2015..........................................................................................................................................
139

Despair and Anger as Puerto Ricans Cope With Debt Crisis // NYT // Lizette
Alvarez – July 3, 2015             142

Obama to meet with leader of Vietnam’s Communist Party at the White House
// WaPo // David Nakamura – July 3,
2015........................................................................................................................
146

*INTERNATIONAL......................................................................................
146*

ISIS Destroys More Artificats in Syria and Iraq // NYT // Rick Gladstone
and Maher Samaan – July 3,
2015..........................................................................................................................................
146

A wave of recent attacks by Palestinians set Israelis on edge // WaPo //
William Booth – July 3, 2015        148

Iran to US: Nuke deal could result in joint cooperation // AP // George
Jahn and Matthew Lee – July 3,
2015..........................................................................................................................................
150

Iran’s foreign minister: ‘We have never been closer to a lasting outcome’
// Politico // Jennifer Shutt and Nahal Toosi – July 3,
2015...................................................................................................
152

*TODAY’S KEY STORIES*

*Hillary Clinton Warns That a Republican President Would Repeat the Health
Law
<http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/03/hillary-clinton-warns-that-a-republican-president-would-repeal-the-health-law/>
// NYT // Maggie Haberman – July 3, 2015 *

Hillary Rodham Clinton warned on Friday that a Republican president would
repeal President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, and she denounced the
administration of George W. Bush for “poor management” of the economy that
led to the recession.

The harsh words from Mrs. Clinton came as she addressed a crowd estimated
by her aides at more than 850 in Hanover, the leafy New Hampshire town that
is home to Dartmouth College.

The state has long been hospitable to the Clinton family – her husband
called himself “the comeback kid” after finishing second in the primary
here in 1992, and she won the 2008 primary – but Mrs. Clinton’s appearance
here came as Bernie Sanders, the Vermont senator, has been surging in polls.

“I will fight hard against what I see as the injustice and unfairness in
our society,” Mrs. Clinton said, discussing her record and seemingly
mindful of Mr. Sanders as she did. “I take a back seat to no one when you
look at my record of standing up and fighting for progressive values.”

Mrs. Clinton’s aides have struggled since before she announced her
candidacy with the reality that her sky-high early poll numbers would be
almost impossible to sustain. They have sought to diminish the expectations
for her, and have sought to avoid chasing distractions.

The Vermont border is just across the Connecticut River from Hanover.
Several attendees at Mrs. Clinton’s event said they were either from
Vermont and were curious, or were supporting Mr. Sanders.

Mrs. Clinton’s speech demonstrated the challenge she faces: She must keep a
wary eye on Mr. Sanders without attacking him, but she must also seem
engaged and rouse her supporters, so attacks on the Republican field on
issues like the Affordable Care Act have been her approach.

“I will defend it and I will do everything i can to improve it,” Mrs.
Clinton said of Mr. Obama’s signature health care law, calling it an issue
of “fairness and humanity, also of economics” and praising the Supreme
Court for recently upholding it.

Republican calls for “repeal, repeal, repeal mean nothing – unless they
elect a Republican president,” Mrs. Clinton warned, saying ominously, “If
the country elects a Republican president, then they will repeal the
Affordable Care Act.”

Her voice rising at times, Mrs. Clinton called for new gun control laws as
she spoke in a state where many residents own guns. And she sounded a note
of muted praise for a potential nuclear deal with Iran, while vowing to
defend her record on “progressive values” against anyone.

Holding a microphone as she spoke from the stage at The Bema, an
amphitheater-style spot near the college campus – where, according to a
Clinton aide, the high school graduation of Mrs. Clinton’s Vermont-bred
campaign manager, Robby Mook, took place – she said that Republican
policies had a history of failure.

“Then Democrats have to come in and fix what’s broken,” she said, noting
that at the end of her husband’s two terms there was a “surplus that would
have paid off the national debt had it not been rudely interrupted by the
next administration.”

Republicans “just don’t know the theory of original sin, because we
wouldn’t have had to have a recovery if we hadn’t had the kind of poor
management and bad economic policies that put us into the ditch in the
first place,” she said to applause.

Mr. Obama, she said, “deserves a lot more credit than he’s usually given”
for pulling the economy back.

She also pledged to continue discussing gun control, saying, “We have to
work very hard to muster the public opinion to convince Congress” to
support universal background checks for gun buyers.

“I think it is the height of irresponsibility not to talk about it, so I
will talk about it,” she said.

As for Iran, Mrs. Clinton walked a careful line. She said she supported the
Obama administration in its efforts to get a deal to curtail Iran’s nuclear
capabilities, calling it a “singular step in the right direction,” but
warned that such a deal would not change the fact that Iran was an
“existential threat to Israel.”

*Clinton says she hopes Iran talks yield a deal
<http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/03/us-iran-nuclear-usa-clinton-idUSKCN0PD28120150703>
// Reuters // Sandra Maler – July 3, 2015 *

U.S. Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton said on Friday she
hoped that 18 months of nuclear talks between Iran and major powers would
yield a deal to curb Iran's nuclear program.

"I so hope that we are able to get a deal in the next week that puts a lid
on Iran's nuclear weapons program," the former secretary of state told a
rally on the Dartmouth College campus in Hanover, New Hampshire, adding
that even if a deal is reached, there will be more work to be done.

Iran is in talks with the United States and five other powers - Britain,
China, France, Germany and Russia - on an agreement to curtail its nuclear
program in exchange for relief from economic sanctions.

Clinton, the front-runner for the Democratic nomination for November 2016,
has generally not commented publicly on the Iran talks since launching her
White House bid in April.

Commenting on the preliminary nuclear deal that was reached just before she
announced her candidacy, Clinton said, "Getting the rest of the way to a
final deal by June won't be easy, but it is absolutely crucial."

Since leaving the State Department in 2013, Clinton has been critical of
some aspects of the Obama administration's foreign policy.

The former U.S. senator and first lady has a big lead in opinion polls over
four Democratic challengers.

The winner of the Democratic nominating race will face the victor of the
Republican contest, in which 14 candidates are competing.

*SOCIAL MEDIA*

*Paul Steinhauser (7/3/15, 3:50 PM)*
<https://twitter.com/steinhauserNH1/status/617042654803677184?s=03>* – 2016
News: @HillaryClinton campaign says Dartmouth puts Hanover #NH rally crowd
size at 850 people #nhpolitics #fitn*

*Amy Chozick (7/3/15, 6:25 PM)*
<https://twitter.com/amychozick/status/617081865325912064>* – Hillary
responds to Bernie burn: “I always knew this was gonna be competitive.”
(Excellent pooling @rubycramer)*

*Zeke Miller (7/3/15, 6:35 PM)*
<https://twitter.com/ZekeJMiller/status/617081777321025536>* – Pool:
@HillaryClinton after being served her ice cream. “is that for me?” she
said. “Holy shamoley.” *

*HRC** NATIONAL COVERAGE*

*Clinton warns that a Republican president would repeal Obamacare
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/03/clinton-warns-that-a-republican-president-would-repeal-obamacare/>
// WaPo // Philip Rucker – July 3, 2015 *

Hillary Rodham Clinton sharpened her partisan rhetoric to appeal to
Democratic primary voters here Friday by issuing a dire warning: President
Obama's health care law would disappear if a Republican wins the White
House in 2016.

Celebrating last month's Supreme Court decision to uphold a key provision
of the Affordable Care Act, Clinton told a crowd of 850 supporters at
Dartmouth College, "I'm so thrilled that we're at a point where all the
calls about 'Repeal! Repeal! Repeal!' mean nothing -- unless they elect a
Republican president."

"If the country elects a Republican president, they will repeal the
Affordable Care Act. That is as certain as I can say it," she continued,
noting the unlikelihood that Democrats take over the Senate and House next
year.

Clinton's comments came during a festive, grass-roots rally in a wooded
pocket of Dartmouth's picturesque campus, where students, professors and
other community members enjoyed hamburgers, hot dogs and pie under a
brilliant summer sun as they awaited Clinton's arrival.

Clinton arrived with little fanfare, casually stepping onto a granite
amphitheater stage and waving hello as she opened a two-day campaign swing
in this first-in-the-nation primary state. She told the crowd she had fond
memories of being at Dartmouth decades ago when she was a student at
Wellesley College in neighboring Massachusetts.

"I came for a blind date during what was then called Winter Carnival," she
said, with a knowing smile. "So I have fond memories."

Clinton portrayed herself as a fighter for progressive values, especially
on the economy. She recalled that in 2008, after President Obama won the
fall election, he invited her to ask her to be his secretary of state and
told her the economy was much worse than anybody truly realized.

Her point was that the peace and prosperity seen under the presidency of
her husband, Bill Clinton, was "rudely interrupted" by President George W.
Bush's eight years in the White House and that it took another Democrat,
Obama, for the economy to recover.

"There's just a pattern here where the other side keeps using the same old
tired, failed policies," she said. "They don't work and then Democratic
presidents have to come in and fix what was broken. So let's break that and
have a Democratic president to continue the policies that actually work for
the vast majority of Americans."

In her remarks here, Clinton touched on an array of liberal themes -- from
expanding federal science and research funding to increased investments in
public infrastructure.

"I take a back seat to no one when you look at my record of standing up and
fighting for progressive values," Clinton said.

She made no mention of Democratic rival Bernie Sanders, the Vermont senator
who has drawn enthusiastic crowds around the country and has surged in the
polls in New Hampshire especially.

But Clinton used the issue of gun control to draw a subtle distinction with
her chief primary opponent, who has a more mixed voting record on guns.
Like New Hampshire, Vermont is a largely rural, pro-gun state.

“We have to take on the gun lobby one more time" Clinton said, espousing
her support for enhanced background checks. "This is a controversial issue.
I am well aware of that. But I think it is the height of irresponsibility
not to talk about it. So I will talk about it and I will look for ways that
we can build that majority."

*Clinton: I hope Iran deal can be reached
<http://www.politico.eu/article/clinton-i-hope-iran-deal-can-be-reached-nuclear-agreement-extended-deadline-us-talks/>
// Politico // Annie Karni – July 4, 2015*

The deadline for negotiations is Tuesday.

Hanover, N.H. — Hillary Clinton, speaking at a campaign rally near
Dartmouth College, weighed in on the Iran nuclear talks taking place in
Vienna this weekend, vowing to protect Israel if a deal is reached.

“I so hope we are able to get a deal next week that puts the lid on Iran’s
nuclear weapons program,” she said. “Even if we do get such a deal, we will
still have major problems from Iran. They are the world’s chief sponsor of
terrorism. They use proxies like Hezbollah to sow discord and create
insurgencies to destabilize governments. They are taking more and more
control of a number of nations in the region and they pose an existential
threat to Israel.”

Critics of the emerging deal have expressed concern that, if and when
sanctions are lifted, Iran would plow its new windfall into efforts to
destabilize Arab countries aligned with the West.

“We still are going to have to turn our attention to working with our
partners to try to reign in and prevent this continuing Iranian
aggressiveness,” Clinton said.

The Iran talks were extended last week as negotiators sought to close the
remaining gaps between the two sides; the new deadline for an agreement is
Tuesday.

In a YouTube video posted online Friday, Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad
Zarif indicated that a deal was in reach.

“At this eleventh hour, despite some differences that remain, we have never
been closer to a lasting outcome,” Zarif said in the four-minute video.
“But there is no guarantee.”

He also warned that further “military and economic coercion” cannot “ensure
submission.”

“I sense that my negotiating partners have recognized that coercion and
pressure never lead to lasting solutions, but to more conflict and further
hostility,” Zarif said. “And now, they realize that the most indiscriminate
and unjust economic sanctions against my country have achieved absolutely
none of their declared objectives; but instead have harmed innocents and
antagonized a peaceful and forgiving nation.”

*Bill and Hillary Clinton fight new demand for email server
<http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2015/07/bill-and-hillary-clinton-fight-new-demand-for-email-209937.html?ml=tl_9>
// Politico // Josh Gerstein – July 3, 2015 *

Lawyers for former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton have moved to block a conservative lawyer's effort to pry
into emails stored on the Clintons' private server.

In a motion filed Thursday evening in federal court in West Palm Beach,
Fla., the Clintons' attorneys ask that conservative gadfly Larry Klayman be
temporarily barred from demanding information in connection with a
racketeering lawsuit he filed in March against the couple and the Clinton
Foundation. The suit alleges that the Clintons used the private email
server to frustrate Freedom of Information Act requests Klayman filed for
records about waivers of Iranian sanctions and about leaks relating to
measures the U.S. and Israel took to deal with Iran's nuclear program.

During a telephone conference in the case Wednesday, federal magistrate
Dave Brannon gave Klayman the go ahead to begin discovery — the process of
demanding documents, evidence and testimony — relevant to the suit.

Within hours of the conference, an aide to Klayman sent the Clinton team
demands for "private email servers and any documents or things" related to
Iran sanctions waivers, the Stuxnet computer virus the U.S. and Israel
reportedly deployed to disrupt Iran's nuclear efforts and releases of
information about plans to strike Iranian nuclear facilities.

Now, the Clinton lawyers are asking to be relieved of any duty to comply
with those requests until a pending motion to dismiss Klayman's suit is
resolved. The Clintons' attorneys also warn that allowing access to their
records under these circumstances would open the door to a flurry of
similar efforts.

"To permit Plaintiff to obtain documents responsive to FOIA requests (to
the extent any even exist) through civil 'discovery' in a meritless lawsuit
against the

former Secretary of State would set a dangerous precedent ripe for abuse,"
the Clinton legal team writes in its motion (posted here).

The Clintons' lawyers, headed by longtime attorney and friend David
Kendall, also point to Klayman's long history of litigation against the
former first couple — cases Kendall said have been unsuccessful.

"Plaintiff has sued former Secretary Clinton or President Clinton at least
fifteen times. Almost all of those lawsuits have failed before or at the
motion-to-dismiss stage, and Mr. Klayman has not prevailed on the merits on
a single claim over his decades-long history of suing the Individual
Defendants," Kendall wrote.

According to the new motion, Brannon said he couldn't entertain the
Clintons' request to halt discovery because the issue hadn't been formally
referred to him by the judge overseeing the case, Donald Middlebrooks — a
Clinton appointee.

Klayman filed a 93-page amended complaint in the case Thursday night. The
complaint (posted here) accuses the Clintons of running a "criminal
enterprise" that involved accepting "bribes" in the form of donations to
the Clinton Foundation and payments for speeches. The conservative lawyer
says he was injured by the alleged conspiracy because he could have used
the undisclosed FOIA documents to advance his livelihood and income as a
public advocate.

Middlebrooks has set a trial date of January 25, if the Clintons don't
succeed in knocking the case out before then.

*Hillary Clinton: ‘I take a backseat to no one’ on liberal record
<http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/hillary-clinton-i-take-a-backseat-to-no-one-on-liberal-record-119723.html?ml=tl_2>
// Politico // Annie Karni – July 3, 2015 *

Hillary Clinton arrived in this liberal New England enclave with a message
for anyone thinking about voting for Sen. Bernie Sanders of next-door
Vermont: “I take a backseat to no one when you look at my record in
standing up and fighting for progressive values.”

Sanders, according to the latest New Hampshire polls, is trailing Clinton
by just eight points. And at the first stop of her two-day swing through
the early-voting state, Clinton highlighted contrasts with her main
Democratic rival without mentioning him by name.

“We have to take on the gun lobby one more time,” said Clinton, speaking
without notes or a teleprompter in front of a crowd of about 850 Dartmouth
students and native Granite Staters. “The majority of gun owners support
universal background checks, and we have to work very hard to muster the
public opinion to convince Congress that’s what they should vote for.”

She said it was the “height of irresponsibility not to talk about it.”
Sanders, who represents a pro-gun constituency, has voted against the Brady
Bill, which required federal background checks for gun purchasers, as well
as other major bills supported by gun-control advocates.

She also signaled that she would have no problem defending President Barack
Obama’s domestic agenda.

“If the country elects a Republican president, then they will repeal the
Affordable Care Act,” she warned. “Let’s elect a Democratic president who
is committed to quality affordable health care.”

She praised Obama’s moves to help the country recover from the economic
crisis and said Republicans who say the recovery is too slow “just don’t
know the theory of original sin,” blaming “the kind of poor management and
bad economic policies that put us into the ditch in the first place.”

Clinton’s cookout — hamburgers and apple pie, served on a sun-dappled green
on the Dartmouth College campus — attracted a crowd with more questions
than passion for the Democratic frontrunner. A few people in the crowd wore
T-shirts supporting Sanders, and waved his campaign banners.

“I’m probably leaning more toward Bernie,” admitted Roland Downey, 18, who
attended the rally with his father, Glenn King, a nurse. “I like that he’s
being more modern,” said Downey of the 73-year-old candidate. “I don’t know
enough about Hillary.” King said he was also still undecided.

Dee Roberts, who works in human resources at Dartmouth College, said she
came out to see Clinton but that she likes what she’s heard from Sanders.
“We’re pretty liberal here,” she said. “He’s very straightforward and
doesn’t take PAC money.” She said she was hoping to hear more specifics
from Clinton on her economic policy.

That didn’t happen Friday — Clinton said she plans to begin laying out
“specific policies” on the economy starting in about 10 days.

Instead, she reiterated some of the issues she has been focused on so far:
expanding voting rights, ending an era of mass incarceration, boosting the
importance of early childhood education and treatment for those with mental
health and substance abuse problems.

She also weighed in on the Iran nuclear talks taking place in Vienna this
weekend, vowing to protect Israel if a deal is reached.

“I so hope we are able to get a deal next week that puts the lid on Iran’s
nuclear weapons program,” she said. “Even if we do get such a deal, we will
still have major problems from Iran. They are the world’s chief sponsor of
terrorism. They use proxies like Hezbollah to sow discord and create
insurgencies to destabilize governments. They are taking more and more
control of a number of nations in the region and they pose an existential
threat to Israel.”

“We still are going to have to turn our attention to working with our
partners to try to reign in and prevent this continuing Iranian
aggressiveness,” she said.

Clinton’s team has been lowering expectations in New Hampshire. And the
local advantage for a candidate like Sanders has, historically, been a real
factor: then Massachusetts Sen. John F. Kennedy won the primary here in
1960 and former

Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis won it in 1988. New Hampshire made Bill
Clinton “the comeback kid,” but he didn’t even win it — he finished second
in New Hampshire in 1992, behind former Massachusetts Senator Paul Tsongas.
Then Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry won the Granite State in 2004. In 2012,
former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney won the New Hampshire primary.

“It is easy for Sen. Sanders to travel here,” said Terry Shumaker, a New
Hampshire attorney who co-chaired both of Bill Clinton’s presidential
campaigns. He said was committed to a real fight in the Granite State. “I
can’t even remember canvassing in late June for a primary eight months
away, but we were doing it last Saturday and Hillary is in New Hampshire
today and tomorrow,” he said.

Clinton supporters also said support for Sanders should not be interpreted
as anti-Clinton sentiment — and that polling shows many of his supporters
list Clinton as their second choice. “From talking to some,” said Shumaker,
“I think that a lot of these folks in the end will vote for her.”

*Hillary Clinton: I hope Iran deal can be reached
<http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/hillary-clinton-i-hope-iran-deal-can-be-reached-119724.html?ml=tl_1>
// Politico // Annie Karni – July 3, 2015 *

Hillary Clinton, speaking at a campaign rally near Dartmouth College,
weighed in on the Iran nuclear talks taking place in Vienna this weekend,
vowing to protect Israel if a deal is reached.

“I so hope we are able to get a deal next week that puts the lid on Iran’s
nuclear weapons program,” she said. “Even if we do get such a deal, we will
still have major problems from Iran. They are the world’s chief sponsor of
terrorism. They use proxies like Hezbollah to sow discord and create
insurgencies to destabilize governments. They are taking more and more
control of a number of nations in the region and they pose an existential
threat to Israel.”

Critics of the emerging deal have expressed concern that, if and when
sanctions are lifted, Iran would plow its new windfall into efforts to
destabilize Arab countries aligned with the West.

“We still are going to have to turn our attention to working with our
partners to try to reign in and prevent this continuing Iranian
aggressiveness,” Clinton said.

The Iran talks were extended last week as negotiators sought to close the
remaining gaps between the two sides; the new deadline for an agreement is
Tuesday.

In a YouTube video posted online Friday, Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad
Zarif indicated that a deal was in reach.

“At this eleventh hour, despite some differences that remain, we have never
been closer to a lasting outcome,” Zarif said in the four-minute video.
“But there is no guarantee.”

He also warned that further “military and economic coercion” cannot “ensure
submission.”

“I sense that my negotiating partners have recognized that coercion and
pressure never lead to lasting solutions, but to more conflict and further
hostility,” Zarif said. “And now, they realize that the most indiscriminate
and unjust economic sanctions against my country have achieved absolutely
none of their declared objectives; but instead have harmed innocents and
antagonized a peaceful and forgiving nation.”

*Hillary steps up liberal rhetoric as Sanders surges in polls
<http://nypost.com/2015/07/03/hillary-steps-up-liberal-rhetoric-amid-sanders-surge-in-polls/>
// AP // July 3, 2015 *

Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday she takes a “backseat to no one” on
championing liberal causes, presenting herself as a standard-bearer for
Democrats as primary challenger Bernie Sanders generates large, energetic
crowds.

Clinton addressed 850 people at an outdoor amphitheater at Dartmouth
College, a last-minute venue change made to accommodate a larger audience.
Days earlier, Sanders spoke before about 10,000 people in Madison,
Wisconsin. The former secretary of state made no mention of Sanders but
warned that Republicans would unravel President Barack Obama’s policies if
they recaptured the White House, including the repeal of his signature
health care overhaul.

“I take a backseat to no one when you look at my record of standing up and
fighting for progressive values,” Clinton said on a sun-dappled kickoff to
the Fourth of July weekend in Hanover, New Hampshire, across the
Connecticut River from Sanders’ home state of Vermont.

The Democratic presidential front-runner presented herself as a candidate
of continuity to Obama and her husband, former President Bill Clinton,
praising the Supreme Court’s recent ruling upholding health care subsidies
under the overhaul. She said if the nation elected a Republican president,
“they will repeal the Affordable Care Act. That is as certain as I can say.”

She said Obama and her husband had both inherited a series of economic
headaches when they entered office and urged voters to elect another
Democrat “to continue the policies that actually work for the vast majority
of Americans.”

Clinton said at the end of her husband’s two terms, the economy had
generated 22 million jobs, a balanced budget and “a surplus that would have
paid off our national debt if it had not been rudely interrupted by the
next administration.”

The former New York senator’s team has been wary of presenting her as the
equivalent of Obama’s third term but her acclaim for the president’s
policies highlighted a string of recent victories by the White House in its
defense of the health care law, the Supreme Court’s ruling allowing gay
marriage and steady economic numbers.

In a rare discussion of foreign policy, Clinton spoke supportively of
Obama’s efforts to reach an agreement with Iran to curb the country’s
nuclear program, talks that she helped set in motion as secretary of state.
Previewing next week’s deadline for negotiations, Clinton said she hoped
the U.S. would “get a deal that puts a lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons
program” but said it was “too soon” to know if that was possible.

Seeking the Democratic nomination, Clinton’s focus has been on economic
issues, the driving force behind Sanders’ recent rise in polls. The senator
describes himself as a democratic socialist and has won elections in
Vermont as an independent. He has drawn large crowds around the country and
reported raising $15 million since late April, about one-third of the $45
million Clinton has brought in.

Sanders said on Friday in an email to supporters that he would release a
series of policy proposals in the next few weeks “to address the major
issues facing our nation.” The campaign is seeking to ramp up its volunteer
base and planning to hold organizing meetings across the nation on July 29.

Clinton’s allies have sought to lower expectations despite her early
command of the primary field. During a stop at an ice cream shop in
Lebanon, New Hampshire, Clinton told reporters “I always knew this was
going to be competitive” and said she was looking forward to a “great
debate.”

Some of the people who came to see Clinton at Dartmouth said Sanders could
ultimately have a positive influence on her.

“I think he’s pushing her to address some issues and I think that will be
all for the good,” said Sybil Buell, a Norwich, Vermont, resident who
attended the Clinton event. Buell said she was “on the fence” over whether
to support Clinton or Sanders in the early stages of the campaign.

“There’s a little feeling of inevitability with her,” said Chuck Manns, of
Lebanon, New Hampshire, who backed Clinton in 2008. He said Sanders was a
“curiosity right now,” but predicted Clinton’s electability would shine
through.

*Hillary Clinton to gay Humans of New York teen: ‘Your future will be
amazing’** // Guardian // Jana Kasperkevic – July 3, 2015 *

Hillary Clinton took to Facebook on Friday to offer words of encouragement
and advice to a gay teen.

The leading Democratic presidential candidate posted remarks in response to
a photo posted by the page of Humans of New York, a project run by
photographer Brandon Stanton.

“I’m a homosexual and I’m afraid about what my future will be and that
people won’t like me,” Stanton quotes the young New Yorker captured in his
photograph as saying.

An hour after Stanton posted the photo, the official Clinton campaign
account left the following comment: “Prediction from a grown-up: Your
future is going to be amazing. You will surprise yourself with what you’re
capable of and the incredible things you go on to do. Find the people who
love and believe in you – there will be lots of them.”

Clinton signed the comment with “-H”, which is used on social media to
indicate that she is the author the post.

Kristina Schake, deputy communications director for the Hillary for America
campaign, then shared the comment on Twitter:

Two hours after Stanton posted the photo, it had accrued more than 20,000
comments.

This is not the first time Clinton has offered her support to the LGBT
community.

Last month, when she officially launched her campaign in New York, the
former secretary of state criticized Republican opponents in the developing
2016 race for turning “their backs on gay people who love each other”.

On 26 June, when the US supreme court ruled to legalize same-sex marriage,
she said she was celebrating the “landmark victory for marriage equality”.

“For too many LGBT Americans who are subjected to discriminatory laws, true
equality is still just out of reach,” Clinton said. “While we celebrate
today, our work won’t be finished until every American can not only marry,
but live, work, pray, learn and raise a family free from discrimination and
prejudice. We cannot settle for anything less.”

*Hillary: “I Take A Backseat To No One” At “Fighting For Progressive
Values”
<http://www.buzzfeed.com/katherinemiller/hillary-take-a-look-at-my-record-of-fighting-for-progressive?utm_term=.wawGJ4MVP#.xoV8m7rEZ>
// Buzzfeed // Katherine Miller – July 3, 2015 *

Before a Friday afternoon crowd of Granite Staters, Hillary Clinton offered
a new line:

“I take a backseat to no one when you look at my record of standing up and
fighting for progressive values.”

Clinton, since her campaign began, has often cast herself as a “fighter” —
emphasizing the “four fights” of her campaign and framing her career, going
back to her days as a lawyer, as “fighting” for the welfare of children and
women.

But the “progressive values” part is new — and just how committed Clinton
is to the current slate of progressive policy goals, particularly when it
comes to economics, has been a source of speculation and critique over the
last year.

Bill Clinton’s presidency often emphasized centrism: He signed the repeal
of the Glass-Steagall Act, the banking securities law that progressives
like Elizabeth Warren want to see restored; he promised and implemented
changes to the welfare system; he supported the tough-on-crime policies
popular in the 1980s and ’90s, that his wife also wrote in support of at
the time.

And Hillary Clinton herself was slow to, for instance, endorse same-sex
marriage; she did not offer her public support until 2013, and did not deem
it a constitutional right until earlier this year.

Hillary Clinton has already campaigned against some of the policies of the
1990s — she’s argued in favor of changes to the criminal justice system and
in favor of significantly broadening legal status and citizenship for
undocumented immigrants.

Where Clinton — often critiqued by liberal Democrats for her connections to
Wall Street — will ultimately come down on the populist economic policies
pushed by progressives has been less clear. While Clinton’s talked often
about “reshuffling” the deck of cards she says is “stacked against”
middle-class and working-class Americans, she’s been less forthcoming about
her proposed economic policies. Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders, the socialist
senator from Vermont, has managed to draw impressive crowds in liberal
bastions like Madison, Wisconsin.

On Friday, though, Clinton said she would soon be outlining her economic
agenda in specifics.

*Hillary Clinton Hopeful For Iran Nuclear Deal Next Week
<http://time.com/3945704/hillary-clinton-iran-nuclear-deal/> // TIME //
Zeke J. Miller – July 3, 2015 *

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Friday that she is hopeful
that a nuclear agreement with Iran can be reached before next week’s
deadline, indicating support for the draft agreement that may or may not
come into force.

Speaking to a crowd of about 850 largely college-aged supporters on the
campus of Dartmouth College, Clinton addressed the latest deadline for the
P5+1 nuclear talks in Vienna, July 9, saying “these things always come down
to the wire.”

“I so hope that we are able to get a deal in the next week that puts a lid
on Iran’s nuclear weapons program because that’s going to be a singular
step in the right direction,” Clinton said. The previous June 30 deadline
was extended to give negotiators more time to try to hammer out lingering
disagreements between the Iranian government and the governments of China,
France, Russia, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany.

“But even if we do get such a deal, we will still have major problems from
Iran,” Clinton said. “They are the world’s chief sponsor of terrorism, they
use proxies like Hezbollah to sow discord and create insurgencies to
destabilize governments. They are taking more and more control of a number
of nations in the region and they pose an existential threat to Israel. So
even if we are successful on the nuclear front, we still are going to have
to turn our attention to working with our partners to try to rein in and
prevent this continuing Iranian aggressiveness.”

Critics of the ongoing negotiations and draft agreement contend that it
does not go far enough in reducing Iran’s stockpile of radioactive
materials and enrichment program. Clinton had previously adopted a measured
tone on the talks, expressing support, but raising questions about whether
Iran would uphold its end of the agreement.

In April, she said she would back a deal that “verifiably cuts off all of
Iran’s paths to a nuclear weapon, imposes an intrusive inspection program
with no sites off limits, extends breakout time, and spells out clear and
overwhelming consequences for violations.”

“The onus is on Iran and the bar must be set high,” she added at the time.

One way or another, Clinton is likely going to have to own the agreement,
as the seeds of the current round of talks began under her tenure in the
Obama administration. Her chief foreign policy advisor Jake Sullivan helped
carry out the secret back-channel negotiations to lay the groundwork for
the Joint Plan of Action announced in 2013.

Clinton also spoke about the Affordable Care Act, seeking to keep alive a
potent Democratic turnout tactic a week after the Supreme Court decided
against undermining the law.

“I am so thrilled that we are at a point where all calls about repeal,
repeal, repeal mean nothing unless they elect a Republican president,”
Clinton said, addressing the crowd from a concrete stage in front of a
shady lawn on the college campus known as the “BEMA” — “big empty meeting
area” — just across the river from Democratic rival, Vermont Sen. Bernie
Sanders’, home state.

“If the country elects a Republican as president, then they will repeal the
Affordable Care Act,” she warned. “That is as certain as I can say unless
we take back the Senate and take back the House. I hope we can do both, but
on the safe side, let’s elect a Democratic president who is committed to
quality, affordable healthcare.”

All Republican presidential candidates have vowed to repeal the law, but
privately many of their aides acknowledge that a complete repeal would be
nearly impossible to pull off, given how entrenched it has already become
in the American healthcare system five years after passage. Republicans on
Capitol Hill, meanwhile, have largely abandoned serious efforts to upend
the law, owing to Obama’s staunch veto threats.

“Let’s break that and have a Democratic president to continue the policies
that actually work for the vast majority of Americans,” Clinton said.

Clinton promised that she would begin to unveil her proposals for the
economy in “about 10 days.”

*Hillary Clinton: Electing Republican President Would Mean Repeal of
Obamacare
<http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-electing-republican-president-would-mean-repeal-obamacare-n386501>
// NBC // Phil Helsel – July 3, 2015 *

Hillary Clinton on Friday warned New Hampshire voters that a Republican
president would mean the end of President Barack Obama's health care
overhaul.

"If the country elects a Republican president, then they will repeal the
Affordable Care Act," Clinton told a crowd of about 850 at Dartmouth
University.

Clinton said she was "thrilled" with the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling
that rejected a challenge to the act, and she said she would defend the
law. "Where there are glitches, we need to address those, but this is a
fundamental issue of fairness and humanity," Clinton said.

On the economy, Clinton said the Republican Party "keeps using the same old
tired failed policies." She said the country needs to increase investment
in science and technology, including green energy.

As talks with Iran over its nuclear program continued this week, Clinton
said she hopes the U.S. gets a deal that "puts the lid on Iran's nuclear
weapons program" — but said that even if such a deal is reached, "we will
still face major problems from Iran."

Clinton also weighed in on gun control. President Barack Obama raised the
topic in comments he made in the aftermath of a deadly attack on a the
historic black church Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, in which nine
people killed nine people in what authorities have said was a hate crime.

"We have to take on the gun lobby one more time," Clinton said. "At the
very least, we need to keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers,
people with serious mental challenges, terrorists, all of whom now are
perfectly free to go and find a gun somewhere," she said.

"This is a controversial issue, I am well aware of that," Clinton said.
"But I think it is the height of irresponsibility not to talk about it. So
I will talk about it."

Clinton's only Democratic rival, Bernie Sanders, drew a crowd of 10,000 in
Madison, Wisconsin, earlier this week. Sanders said Friday in an email to
supporters that he would release a series of policy proposals in the next
few weeks "to address the major issues facing our nation."

"I think he's pushing her to address some issues and I think that will be
all for the good," Sybil Buell, a Norwich, Vermont, resident who attended
the Clinton event, told The Associated Press. Buell said she was "on the
fence" over whether to support Clinton or Sanders in the early stages of
the campaign.

*Hillary Clinton Not Fazed by Bernie Sanders’ Crowds
<http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-fazed-bernie-sanders-crowds/story?id=32215246>
// ABC // Liz Kreutz – July 3, 2015 *

Hillary Clinton does not yet seem fazed by Bernie-mentum.

During a campaign stop in New Hampshire on Friday, the Democratic
presidential front-runner responded to a question from a reporter about the
massive crowds her challenger, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, has seen at his
own campaign events this week.

“We each run our own campaigns and I always knew this was going to be
competitive,” Clinton said at Dairy Twirl ice cream shop in Lebanon, New
Hampshire, when asked about the growing support behind Sanders and how he's
seeing crowds even bigger than she is.

“I want to have a great debate in the primary and caucus around the country
and that is what I am looking forward to," she added.

This past week Sanders drew the largest crowd yet of any presidential
candidate this campaign cycle. An estimated 10,000 people filled an arena
in Madison, Wisconsin, to hear him speak.

Clinton's comments today came just after she held an organizing event at
Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire. According to her campaign, the
rally had a turnout of roughly 850 people – a measly number, perhaps,
compared to what Sanders attracted this week. However, Clinton's campaign
did have to move the afternoon event to a larger venue because of what they
said was “increased local interest in attending.”

During her remarks at the rally, Clinton also doubled down on her own
record as a progressive candidate.

"I take a back seat to no one when you look at my record of standing up and
fighting for progressive values," she said in a woodsy, outdoor arena on
the Ivy League's campus.

*Richard Nixon Biographer: Hillary Clinton Has ‘Nixonian Attributes’
<http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/richard-nixon-biographer-hillary-clinton-nixonian-attributes/story?id=32194927>
// ABC // Rick Klein – July 3, 2015 *

It’s become almost cliché in American politics to call a politician
Nixonian or “like Nixon” -- and it’s rarely a positive to compare an
officeholder or candidate to the only U.S. president to resign from office.

Yet to Evan Thomas, the author of a new Nixon biography who also covered
the Clinton White House, comparing Hillary Clinton to Nixon works -- to an
extent.

“Mrs. Clinton does have some Nixonian attributes. She can be guarded and
defensive, a little bit too tough on her enemies,” Thomas said in ABC News'
“Power Players” series. “I saw this firsthand. She needs to watch that.”

“She’s not involved in anything like Watergate. She's not Nixon,” he
continued. “If you think you can manipulate the press and stonewall
forever, [when] you're running for president and you're president, I don't
think that works.”

Thomas’ book, “Being Nixon: A Man Divided,” captures the contradictions of
the 37th president, a profane and often bitter man who was also an optimist
(he always thought even bad movies would get better, Thomas writes) who won
four elections on national tickets.

Thomas describes Nixon’s habit of working out of the Executive Office
Building on the White House conflict -- he didn’t like the Oval Office --
in overnight hours, when he couldn’t sleep.

“Here's the guy who's the most powerful political person in the universe at
the time -- didn't like people. He was shy,” Thomas said. “Mostly he wanted
to be alone.”

The Nixon that comes through on the famous Watergate tapes -- vindictive,
racist, anti-Semitic, angry -- doesn’t capture the full man, he said.

“He showed off. He was trying to be like [Lyndon Johnson]. LBJ was good at
swearing, Nixon was bad at it,” Thomas said. “It just wasn't natural to
Nixon. He did a lot of it -- I'm not minimizing what's on those tapes, it's
terrible. But you know if you listen to a lot of the tapes -- he talks
about the world. He's a very intellectual, intelligent man, It's just that
he would show off by yelling too much.”

Hillary Clinton’s representatives declined comment when reached by ABC News.

*Dems have to take White House to keep Obamacare, Clinton warns
<http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2015/07/dems_have_to_take_white_house_to_keep_obamacare_clinton_warns>
// Boston Herald // Chris Cassidy – July 3, 2015 *

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that if Democrats don’t
take the White House in 2016, Obamacare — despite being affirmed in a
Supreme Court decision last week — could still be doomed.

“I’m so thrilled we are at a point where all the calls about ‘repeal,
repeal, ‘repeal’ mean nothing unless they elect a Republican president,”
Clinton said at an outdoor Dartmouth College rally this afternoon. “If the
country elects a Republican president, they will appeal the Affordable Care
Act. That’s as certain as I can say, unless we take back the Senate and
take back the House. I hope we can do both, but just to be on the safe
side, let’s elect a president who’s committed to affordable health care.”

Clinton also took a subtle jab at Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders who has been
drawing crowds of thousands recently and closing the gap in polls to under
10 points, claiming she’s the progressive candidate for president.

“I will fight against inequality,” said Clinton. “I have a long history of
doing that. I will fight hard against what I see as the injustice and
unfairness in our society. I take a backseat to no one when you look at my
record of standing up and fighting for progressive values.”

Clinton repeated a familiar piece of her stump speech where she reminds
Democrats of the economic failures left behind by both President George
H.W. Bush and George W. Bush.

“There’s just a pattern where the other side keeps using the same old tired
failed policies, they don’t work, and Democratic presidents have to come in
and fix what was broken,” Clinton said.

She will also hold a rally in Glen, then march in a parade in Gorham
tomorrow as her two-day New Hampshire trip continues.

*In House, liberals side with Clinton over Sanders
<http://itk.thehill.com/homenews/house/246845-in-house-liberals-side-with-clinton-over-sanders>
// The Hill // Mike Lillis – July 3, 2015 *

Dozens of House liberals have endorsed Hillary Clinton's White House bid
even as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is gaining steam.

Sanders, a liberal icon, has emerged as a surprisingly strong candidate
since launching his campaign two months ago, raising $15 million and making
huge gains on Clinton recently among Democratic voters in Iowa, which will
host the country's first presidential caucus.

Yet at least 26 Democrats representing the 69-member Congressional
Progressive Caucus –– a bastion of liberal thinking that Sanders helped to
launch –– have already endorsed Clinton, according to a tally being kept by
The Hill.

The list includes liberal stalwarts like Reps. Rosa DeLaura (D-Conn.) and
Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) –– both forceful voices in the recent trade debate
that Clinton was reluctant to enter –– and Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Jan
Schakowsky (D-Ill.) and Jim McDermott (D-Wash.), three vociferous critics
of an Iraq War that Clinton, as a New York senator, supported.

A number of Democrats have cheered Sanders' entrance into the race, and
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), another liberal favorite, hasn't ruled out
the possibility of campaigning for him.

“I love what Bernie is talking about,” she told the Boston Globe Monday.

But no members of Congress have officially endorsed the Vermont senator.

Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.), head of the Progressive Caucus, said the
decision to withhold endorsements this early in the primary process is a
practical one. Many lawmakers simply want a longer opportunity to hear
where candidates stand on the issues, he said.

“There will come a point when each person will make up his or her mind as
to who to support, and allowing the primary to play out a bit gives
everyone the chance to make that decision with as much information as
possible,” Grijalva said in an email. “Endorsing now does a disservice to
our candidates who are looking for time to make their case to the American
people.”

A House Democratic aide echoed that message, suggesting that early
endorsements risk undermining the opportunity for lawmakers to influence
the debate. The greatest sway the Democrats will have, the aide argued,
will be in proposing specific policy prescriptions surrounding the most
prominent legislative fights to come –– including the looming debates over
a highway bill, government spending and the Ex-Im bank –– and seeing how
the candidates react.

“Coming out now doesn't really give you anything,” said the aide, whose
boss has not yet endorsed a Democratic candidate. “The ideas coming from
congressional Democrats will be more important.”

Licy DoCanto, head of The DoCanto Group, a public policy consulting firm,
downplayed the influence of congressional endorsements, arguing that
they're largely “immaterial” outside the Beltway. The real challenge facing
Sanders and the others in the Democratic field –– including former Maryland
Gov. Martin O'Malley and former Sen. Jim Webb (Va.) –– is not in winning
endorsements but in building a national profile to rival Clinton's.

The recent Iowa poll, he said, is indication that at least Sanders might be
breaking through.

“The rest of the country is starting to realize there are other serious
candidates, DoCanto said. “It's not just Hillary Clinton.”

Clinton remains by far the front-runner within a tiny Democratic field. The
former secretary of state has, for years, been laying the operational
ground work of her candidacy, and she hauled in a record of more than $45
million in the first quarter of the race.

But she's also raised concerns among liberals on and off Capitol Hill, who
have criticized her silence on the trade debate, hammered her approach to
national security issues and questioned her ties to Wall Street and other
well-heeled donors.

Sanders long track record in Congress, many liberals contend, makes him the
better voice for the middle class.

“Bernie has been there with us every time, fighting for fairness, for
environmental justice, for voting rights and getting big money out of
politics,” Larry Cohen, a leader of the Communication Workers of America,
said this week in endorsing Sanders. “This is our chance to build a
movement that will not answer to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.”

The debate arrives following a 2014 election cycle when Democrats were
hammered at the polls, losing control of the Senate and ceding the largest
GOP House majority since the Great Depression.

Leaders of the Progressive Caucus and other liberals have blamed the losses
on what they say is the reluctance of Democrats to embrace core principles
like wage equality, universal healthcare and a robust safety-net system.
Many are welcoming the notion of a well-contested Democratic primary –– in
lieu of a landslide –– arguing that the ultimate nominee will be better
poised to win the White House afterwards.

“President Obama and Secretary Clinton both benefitted from their
hard-fought primary in 2008,” Grijalva said. “They tested each other, and
as a result, they both became stronger leaders in the end.”

Democratic strategists say there are numerous factors fueling the timing
and direction of lawmaker endorsements, including historic loyalties to
candidates, public sentiment, gender considerations and regional concerns.
But while those endorsements can help with fundraising, groundwork and
momentum, the strategists add, it's ultimately up to the contenders
themselves to win the trust of voters and get them to the polls.

“You have another surrogate in your army to go out there and spread the
message,” said Doug Thornell, democratic strategist and managing director
at SKDKnickerbocker, a public affairs firm. “But when it comes to winning
the votes, it's up to the candidates.”

On the primary front, the Democrats think they have the advantage over the
Republicans, who have a much larger field and face more pressure to
distinguish themselves as top-tier candidates. Thornell predicted the GOP
primary “is going to get bloody earlier than normal.”

“There are going to be a lot of desperate Republicans, doing whatever it
takes to claw their way into the top ten,” Thornell said. “The Democrats
don't really have that problem.”

*Hillary Clinton to head back to Iowa
<http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/246836-clinton-to-head-back-to-iowa>
// The Hill // Ben Kamisar – July 3, 2015 *

Hillary Clinton will head back to the Hawkeye State for the fourth time
since she jumped into the 2016 presidential race, her campaign announced on
Friday.

She’ll speak at an organizing event at the Iowa City Public Library on July
7, followed by an event at a private home in Ottumwa, a southern city in
Wapello County.

Back in 2008, 43 percent of the county’s 3,100 Democratic caucus-goers
sided with former Sen. John Edwards (N.C.), while 32 percent backed Clinton
and 24 chose then-Sen. Obama.

Clinton has spent most of her almost three months on the campaign in the
early primary states of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada.
With this visit, she’ll have visited Iowa more than any other state during
the campaign.

Both her main Democratic foes, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former Gov.
Martin O’Malley (Md.), are in Iowa for campaign events on Friday. She
currently holds a strong lead in recent Hawkeye State polling, but that
lead has slipped as of late.

A new Quinnipiac poll released Thursday showed Clinton with 52 percent and
Sanders with 33 percent, a 19-point lead. That’s down from a 45-point lead
in a Quinnipiac poll from May.

*Inside Hillary Clinton’s evolution from Girl Scout to presidential
frontrunner
<http://www.businessinsider.com/photos-of-hillary-clinton-2015-6?op=1> //
Business Insider // Melia Robinson – July 3, 2015 *

Before she became First Lady, New York's first female US senator, and a
viral internet meme, Hillary Clinton was a city girl who dreamed of being
an astronaut or a baseball player.

Clinton, for the second time, is seeking the Democratic nomination for
president. She'll campaign in New Hampshire over the long holiday weekend.

With her presidential campaign officially in full gear, we decided to take
a look back at how Clinton became one of the world's most powerful people.

Born October 26, 1947, Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton grew up in Park Ridge,
Illinois, an upper-middle-class Chicago suburb with tree-lined streets,
shopping centers, and church spires dotting the skyline.

The family lived in a two-story brick house on the corner of Wisner and Elm
Streets, since named Rodham Corner by the city. It was a central hub for
the neighborhood children.

Clinton's mother, Dorothy, cared for the family and taught Sunday School,
and her father, Hugh, ran a small drapery business after serving in the
Navy during World War II.

Not one for gender norms, Clinton wanted to be an astronaut or a baseball
player when she grew up. She was an active participant in sports, her
church, and Girl Scouts.

Dorothy encouraged her daughter to stand up for herself, even giving
Clinton permission to punch a bully who tormented some of the neighborhood
kids. When Clinton finally confronted her menace, she raced home to
announce her victory, saying, "I can play with the boys now!"

She brought home good grades in junior high, but her father remained
unimpressed and told her "school must have been too easy." His response
pushed Clinton to study hard and prove him wrong.

While a student at Wellesley College, Clinton began to drift from her
father's conservative values and lean to the left, causing them to fall
out, according to some of Clinton's biographers. She majored in political
science.

At commencement, she tossed aside much of her prepared speech and
criticized the remarks of a US senator, who had spoken just moments before.
TIME magazine profiled Clinton, and she arrived at Yale Law School with a
reputation for audacity.

Soon after, she met a young man named Bill, "a wild card in her
well-ordealed cerebral existence." There are numerous stories in
circulation on how the classmates became an item.

In his memoir, Bill Clinton writes that Hillary caught his eye in a class
on political and civil rights. "She had thick dark blond hair and wore
eyeglasses and no makeup," he describes. "But she conveyed a sense of
strength and self-possession I had rarely seen in anyone, man or woman."

"He was the first man I'd met," Hillary told one interviewer, "who wasn't
afraid of me." When Bill returned to Arkansas with lofty political
ambitions, Hillary — who worked as a staff attorney for the Children's
Defense Fund and then for an investigative committee advising the House on
Watergate — followed. The pair married in 1975.

Clinton, who originally declined to take on her husband's last name, had
ambitions of her own. In a new state, she taught college law, became the
first woman to make partner at her firm, and gave birth to a girl, named
Chelsea.

During her 12 years as Arkansas' First Lady, Clinton emerged as a
champion-to-be-reckoned-with of children's legal rights. She "chaired the
Arkansas Educational Standards Committee ... and co-founded the Arkansas
Advocates for Children and Families."

She continued with that momentum as First Lady of the US. Clinton led the
fight for healthcare reform, but that push ultimately failed.

In 1995, Clinton delivered a groundbreaking speech at the United Nation's
Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China, declaring that "human
rights are women's rights, and women's rights are human rights once and for
all."

Controversy rocked the White House when Bill Clinton, two years into his
second term, admitted to having an affair with an intern. Hillary Clinton
stuck by him, shocking some feminists and contributing to the survival of
her husband's presidency.

The family later purchased this 100-year-old Dutch Colonial home outside
Westchester, New York, for $1.7 million, so that Clinton could establish
residency in the state. She set sights on a US Senate seat in 2001.

The first woman senator from New York, Clinton helped expand broadband
across the state, expanded TRICARE, and secured $20 billion to rebuild New
York after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

After being reelected to the US Senate and launching an unsuccessful
campaign for the presidency, Clinton took on her most international role
yet: Secretary of State under President Barack Obama, to whom she had just
lost the Democratic presidential nomination.

Obama dispatched Clinton to broker a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas,
paving the way for peace talks.

She gathered with senior officials in the Situation Room as US Special
Forces carried out a raid in Pakistan resulting in the death of Osama bin
Laden.

Clinton took the fall for the deadly attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that left
a US ambassador and three other Americans dead. A House committee is still
investigating her and the department's handling of the situation.

After traveling nearly 1 million miles and visiting more countries than any
of her predecessors, Clinton stepped down from office and returned to the
private sector.

Last year, Clinton stepped into a new role that she says "will affect my
being, not just my thinking" — grandmother. Daughter Chelsea gave birth to
a little girl named Charlotte.

The last few months kept Clinton's eyes on the prize: a second run at the
US presidency in 2016. She announced her official bid on New York's
Roosevelt Island in June.

*Judicial Watch: Obama and Hillary Clinton Concocted Benghazi Video Lie
with Jihadist Help
<http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/07/03/judicial-watch-obama-and-hillary-clinton-concocted-benghazi-video-lie-with-jihadist-help/>
// Breitbart // Edwin Mora – July 3, 2015 *

President Obama and Hillary Clinton likely made the decision to falsely tie
an inflammatory anti-Islam Internet video to the fatal Sept. 11, 2012
terrorist attack that left four Americans dead in Benghazi, Libya, the
chief of the conservative government watchdog group Judicial Watch (JW)
told Breitbart News.

The president and then-Secretary of State Clinton sought the assistance
from domestic and foreign jihadists in spreading the online video lie,
added JW President Tom Fitton.

Breitbart News spoke to Fitton about newly released Benghazi attack-related
documents pried out of the U.S. State Department under a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by JW last September.

One of the document shows that the Pentagon received a request for military
assets in response to the attack, but the Obama administration seemingly
refused.

An email from the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) to top White
House and other administration officials states, “OSD has received queries
asking if military assets are being sent to either location [Libya and
Egypt].  Have responded ‘not to our knowledge.’”

The Obama administration’s initial response explaining the cause of the
attack was “immediately determined by top Obama White House officials”
contrary to the president’s claim that it was based on intelligence
available at the time.

Obama officials and the president himself linked an anti-Islam Internet
video to the attack, saying it incited the terrorists who carried out the
assault.

The president said the video link was gleaned from the “best understanding
of the intelligence that had been provided.”

However, Fitton told Breitbart News, “We haven’t found any records or any
intelligence that the video had anything to do with the Benghazi attacks.”

“What you have is nothing other than Mrs. Clinton’s statement referencing a
video, the White House approving it before it was released and then
blessing it, saying, ‘this is our response,'” he added.

Fitton noted that President Obama spoke to Clinton during the night of the
attack.

“I think you can fairly conclude that it was during that phone call that
they decided to push the video lie,” he told Breitbart News.

“They started soliciting Islamists to promote the video lie — some of the
Islamists responded by saying, ‘the video is terrible, the attacks are
justified, we should outlaw all criticism of Islam.’ Thank you Obama! This
is what we get as a result of your engagement,” he added.

The Obama administration refuses to divulge the contents of the phone
conversation.

“There’s a document that tells us what was said between Obama and Clinton
during the night of the attack,” said the JW chief. “There’s nothing
prohibiting its release, it’s purely discretionary.”

The Clinton-led State Department deferred to the White House on the
official response to the attack, according to an e-mail sent by a
department spokesperson to the aide of a top State Department official and
Clinton’s personal aide the day of the tragedy.

A separate e-mail sent out later that day confirms that the White House
decided to go with Clinton’s statement tying the Benghazi terrorist attack
to the Internet video as the accepted overall government response for the
night.

The “[U.S. government] comment” ended up being “Clinton’s notorious public
statement, made hours after the initial terrorist attack, falsely
suggesting that the Benghazi assault was a ‘response to inflammatory
material posted on the Internet,” notes JW in a press release.

Obama administration officials stuck to that narrative until it was
debunked. JW obtained documents in April 2014 revealing the president’s
public relations team intentionally portrayed the Benghazi attack being
“rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy.”

Last month, JW released documents showing that the Obama administration was
made aware that al-Qaeda was behind the attack immediately after it
occurred.

“The new documents show that the Obama administration engaged domestic and
foreign Islamist groups and foreign nationals to push the Internet video
narrative,” reports JW. “The day after the attack, Rashad Hussain, the
Obama administration’s special envoy to the Organization of Islamic
Cooperation (OIC), sent an email to Ambassador Ufuk Gokcen, the OIC’s
ambassador to the United Nations, and Cenk Uraz, an official with the OIC,
pushing the video as the cause of the Benghazi attack.”

Hussain played a role in pushing the rhetoric that the video incited the
terrorists attack and in fuelling efforts to criminalize criticism of Islam.

Another document detailed “how the Obama administration reached out to
domestic groups, foreign groups and governments in a full-court press to
tie the video to the Benghazi attack,” reports JW.

U.S. Amb. J. Christopher Stevens, U.S. Foreign Service Information
Management Officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors, Tyrone S. Woods and
Glen Doherty were killed in the attack.

*Why was Cherie so keen to open doors for a billionaire sheikh’s wife?
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3147986/Why-Cherie-keen-open-doors-billionaire-sheikh-s-wife.html>
// Daily Mail // Guy Adams – July 3, 2015 *

Though she has pointedly refused in the past to bow or curtsey to Her
Majesty the Queen, Cherie Blair tends to adopt a very different policy when
she meets stupendously rich royals from one particular, very wealthy corner
of the Middle East.

Back in 2006, she was, for example, photographed dutifully nodding her head
at an absolute monarch named Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa al-Thani and his
wife, Sheikha Mozah Bint Nasser al Missned, on the steps of 10 Downing
Street.

Sheikh Hamad is the former ruler of Qatar, a Sharia state where
homosexuality is punishable by imprisonment or flogging, migrant workers
are routinely abused, women’s rights are severely curtailed, and the
government, which allows the Afghan Taliban to run an office in its
capital, Doha, has been widely accused of sponsoring terrorism.

Fortunately, he also happens to have a personal fortune of £1.5 billion,
thanks to his country’s vast reserves of oil and gas.

The Sheikh is rarely afraid to throw that money around, especially in
Britain. Which may, or may not, have helped Mrs Blair reconcile the
decision to make such a public gesture of subservience with her
oft-repeated support for feminism, equality and other matters of Left-wing
principle.

This week, almost a decade later, came a fascinating insight into another
display of loyalty to Qatar on Cherie’s part.

A tranche of private emails, released by the U.S. government, revealed that
Cherie subsequently acted as a sort of informal fixer for the Qatari
royals, successfully lobbying Hillary Clinton to agree to a private meeting
with Sheikha Mozah.

It showed how, two years after leaving Downing Street, she asked Mrs
Clinton, who was then the U.S. Secretary of State (America’s version of a
Foreign Secretary) to hold ‘women to women’ [sic] talks with the wealthy
Arab royal, whom she dubbed ‘my friend from Q’ [Qatar].

Mrs Blair and Mrs Clinton exchanged 19 messages about the matter over a
four-month period in 2009, in a correspondence that at times sees the
former prime minister’s wife sounding very like a pushy lobbyist for the
Gulf dynasty.

‘Sheikha Moser [sic] has approached me privately saying they are keen to
get their relationship with the USA onto a more positive footing and she
was hoping for a “women to women” one-to-one private meeting with you,’
reads her opening email to Hillary Clinton, sent in May 2009.

Sheikha Mozah ‘has real influence in Qatar’, it continues, adding that she
would like, in particular, to discuss disability issues, though: ‘I am sure
the conversation would not be confined to these issues, but would be about
the U.S./Qatar relationship generally.’

Intriguingly, Cherie claims in that message to have been ‘working with’ the
Arab country’s royals since as far back as 2005, at a time when her
husband, Tony, was prime minister.

Several emails later, with a meeting successfully set up, Britain’s former
‘first lady’ sends a message showering Ms Clinton with effusive praise,
saying: ‘It’s fantastic to see you doing so well, and when I see what a
difference you are making it reminds me why politics is too important to be
left to the bad people.’

By ‘bad people’, Ms Blair presumably means anyone whose political outlook
fails to dovetail with her own.

But we digress. Following further scheduling adjustments, the meeting
finally took place in September 2009. Shortly afterwards, Hillary emailed
Cherie to apologise for managing to ‘miss you’ on a recent trip to Europe,
explaining only ‘a few minutes w (sic) Tony at the . . . mtg.’

Cherie replied cheerfully: ‘It was great to see Bill on such good form. My
friend from Q really enjoyed your meeting and felt it had gone well. Hope
you did, too.’

These informal, sometimes unctuous emails were sent via Mrs Blair’s HTC
smartphone to Mrs Clinton’s private account.

They came to light this week thanks to U.S. freedom of information laws,
which saw a court order that the messages be subject to the same public
disclosure as ones sent to and from official White House email addresses.

Much of the correspondence surprised Middle East experts, many of whom were
baffled as to why Sheikha Mozah needed Cherie Blair to introduce her to
Hillary Clinton in the first place. ‘The Sheikha is a very high-powered
woman and I seriously doubt she would have required an introduction,’ says
Chris Doyle, of the Council for Arab-British understanding.

‘The U.S. has a military base in Qatar, and the countries have diplomatic
relations. It’s possible Mrs Blair is attempting to connect them for her
own reasons.’

Intriguingly, given her lofty career as a barrister, Cherie’s emails are
riddled with sloppy spelling and grammatical errors.

She calls Hillary ‘Hilary’, frequently fails to use question marks, commas
and full stops, and confuses the words ‘woman’ and ‘women’.

Throughout the correspondence, she also repeatedly mis-spells the Sheikha’s
name as ‘Moser’ rather than ‘Mozah’. ‘It’s incredibly incompetent to
mis-spell her name. If this is noticed by Her Highness and the people
around her, they will not like it,’ says Chris Doyle.

‘These emails will be read and gossiped about throughout the Gulf and could
be very damaging to Blair’s future interests.’

Of particular concern to Qatar will be any suggestion that Cherie or
Hillary’s interest in the Sheikha was motivated by a desire for possible
financial gain.

‘Any sense that the Qataris have been treated like that will be met with
huge resentment,’ he says.

Recent years have, after all, seen the Blairs — Tony was Middle East peace
envoy for eight years until he recently stood down — frequently criticised
for using the contacts they gained in Downing Street to continue to wield
power and influence behind the scenes, often seeming to enrich themselves
in the process. His firm, Tony Blair Associates, is active in several Gulf
states.

To this end, it’s interesting to note that Sheikh Hamad was one of the
first foreign statesmen invited to visit the couple after they moved into
Downing Street in 1997.

Over the ensuing years, Qatar embarked on an astonishing spending spree in
Britain, buying such trophy assets as The Shard, Harrods, the 2012 Olympic
Village, the former U.S. Embassy in Mayfair’s Grosvenor Square and a
quarter of supermarket Sainsbury’s.

Sheikha Mozah, the second (and undoubted favourite) of Sheikh Hamad’s three
wives — and the mother of Qatar’s monarch, Sheikh Tamin bin Hamad al-Thani
— has also splashed the cash.

In 2013, she spent £120million buying London’s most expensive private
house, which takes up three adjacent properties in Cornwall Terrace by
Regent’s Park, and boasts a private beauty salon, gymnasium, servants’
quarters, ‘children’s floor’ and swimming pool built from Portland stone.

Given such ostentation, conspiracy theorists will seek to join the dots
between Mrs Blair’s assiduous networking on behalf of the free-spending
Sheikha and some of the extremely lucrative work Qatar later bunged her
family’s way.

In 2012, for example, Tony Blair was paid an astonishing $1million simply
for setting up a meeting between the al-Thanis and the commodities firm
Glencore, which was seeking a £50billion merger with Qatari-controlled firm
Xstrata.

The money, the equivalent of £640,000, was earned for just three hours of
work.

In 2011, he acted as an ‘honest broker’ who attempted to ‘smooth over’ a
failed effort by the Qataris to buy the London hotels Claridge’s, the
Berkeley and the Connaught.

The deal’s existence was revealed in a later court case. Had it come off,
Tony would have netted a rumoured seven-figure sum.

Cherie, meanwhile, has seen Qatari money funnelled to her personal charity,
the Cherie Blair Foundation for Women.

In 2013, Sheikha Mozah spent £120million buying London’s most expensive
private house, which takes up three adjacent properties in Cornwall Terrace
by Regent’s Park, and boasts a private beauty salon, gymnasium, servants’
quarters, ‘children’s floor’ and swimming pool built from Portland stone

Happily, after Hillary was put in touch with the Sheikha by Cherie,
Hillary’s Clinton Foundation charity also shared in the wealth.

It has received between $1million and $5million from the Qatari government,
according to U.S. records. Included in that sum is a donation of between
$250,000 and $500,000 from the Qatar 22 Supreme Committee, which
controversially helped win the 2022 World Cup in circumstances that are
widely believed to have been corrupt.

With regard to the emails, a spokesman for Mrs Blair said she was ‘merely
acting as a conduit’ between two influential friends, as she had
established a shared interest in disability issues with Sheikha Mozah.

There is, of course, no suggestion of any wrongdoing on the Blairs’ part.
But the email messages, along with the strange esteem in which Cherie
appears to hold these dynastic Arab royals, may offer further evidence of
how extreme wealth, particularly in the hands of repressive foreign
potentates, so often attracts the interest of the Blairs.

*OTHER DEMOCRATS NATIONAL COVERAGE*

*DECLARED*

*O’MALLEY*

*O’Malley jabs at GOP-led Congress in Newton
<http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2015/07/03/martin-malley-clean-energy-gop-dmaac-iowa-caucuses/29675557/?from=global&sessionKey=&autologin=>
// Des Moines Register // Grant Rodgers – July 3, 2015 *

Presidential contender Martin O'Malley offered hopeful words Friday for
Democrats tired of the country's Republican-led Congress.

"I have some good news for you," he said. "I think we all have to
acknowledge that we will not be here forever, and I think we can applaud
the fact that this Congress will not be in office forever."

The quip drew laughs and applause from the crowd of more than 60 at Uncle
Nancy's Coffee House, a shop on the Newton square with quilts covering the
walls. It was the answer to a question from the audience on how he'd handle
partisan bickering in Congress if elected president.

O'Malley offered up — as he has often in Iowa — examples from his terms as
Maryland's governor. Any good executive realizes nothing can get done
without input from political opponents, he said.

"I'm going to call them, call them, call them," he said. "Many of the
things that we got done, whether it was marriage equality or repealing the
death penalty in Maryland, we only got done because of a few Republican
legislators that voted with us."

Pella resident Cheryl Scherr, who asked the question, said she's quickly
pivoted to support O'Malley after the grassroots campaign prodding
Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren to run folded. Scherr was enthused by
O'Malley after seeing him speak at the state's Democratic convention in
2014, she said.

"I like his ideas, especially emphasizing Main Street over Wall Street,"
she said.

The Newton stop was his second on Friday amid a three-day swing through
Iowa.

Earlier in Ankeny, O'Malley said his proposal to power America's electrical
grid solely through clean energy by 2050 is the best plan from any 2016
presidential candidate to combat climate change. The former governor
likened his clean energy plan to putting a man on the moon during a tour of
Des Moines Area Community College's wind turbine technology facility.

"We had a deadline, and smart people rose to the challenge," he said. "It
was an engineering challenge and it was a cause worthy of a great people,
and so too is saving our planet from irreversible climate change."

Tenets of O'Malley's energy plan include:

·         Founding a Clean Energy Job Corps that would create jobs
retro-fitting buildings across the country to be more energy efficient and
restoring forest areas that absorb carbon from the atmosphere.

·         Passing federal legislation to put caps on carbon emissions on
all sources, including factories and power plants. The federal government
would issue carbon emissions permits and invest portions of the money
brought in back into the job corps.

·         Rejecting applications for projects such as the controversial
Keystone XL Pipeline and denying new permits for oil drilling off-shore and
in Alaska. Royalties would be increased for companies currently drilling on
federal land, and the money would be re-invested in job training programs.

That message of mixing job opportunities with clean energy resonated with
Ellen Bridenstine, 54, a Des Moines Public Library employee who came to the
Ankeny event. O'Malley, though lagging in the polls behind Sen. Bernie
Sanders and Hillary Clinton, could be a "fresh face" for the party, she
said.

"I'm very concerned about the status of the planet, which makes everything
else seems sort of in the background," she said. "I sense his awareness and
interest in that issue."

AT THE EVENT

SETTING: O'Malley toured DMAAC's wind turbine technology facility Friday
before a stop at Uncle Nancy's Coffee House in Newton.

CROWDS: Around seven people, not counting journalists and campaign staff,
came to see O'Malley at the Ankeny event. More than 60 people were waiting
to see him in Newton.

REACTION: Emma Huston, 20, a Drake University biology student, said she was
impressed by O'Malley's clean energy plan, but she's not ready to support a
single candidate. Many of her friends are Bernie Sanders supporters.

WHAT'S NEXT: O'Malley is speaking at meet-and-greets in Waterloo and
Manchester on Friday. He will finish a three-day tour of the state on
Saturday. For details, visit
data.desmoinesregister.com/iowa-caucus/candidate-tracker/index.php

*SANDERS*

*Bernie Sanders’s Revolutionary Roots Were Nurtured in ‘60s Vermont
<http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/07/04/us/politics/bernie-sanderss-revolutionary-roots-were-nurtured-in-60s-vermont.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=0&referrer=>
// NYT // Sarah Lyall – July 3, 2015 *

When he came to Vermont in the late 1960s to help plan the upending of the
old social order, the future presidential candidate Bernie Sanders brought
with him the belief that the United States was starkly divided into two
groups: the establishment and the revolutionaries. He was a revolutionary.

“The Revolution Is Life Versus Death,” in fact, was the title of an article
he wrote for The Vermont Freeman, an alternative, authority-challenging
newspaper published for a few years back then. The piece began with an
apocalyptically alarmist account of the unbearable horror of having an
office job in New York City, of being among “the mass of hot dazed humanity
heading uptown for the 9-5,” sentenced to endless days of “moron work,
monotonous work.”

“The years come and go,” Mr. Sanders wrote, in all apparent seriousness.
“Suicide, nervous breakdown, cancer, sexual deadness, heart attack,
alcoholism, senility at 50. Slow death, fast death. DEATH.”

Chalk some of this up to being young and unemployed. Mr. Sanders, now 73,
has had a steady, nonrevolutionary job for quite some time now. His current
workplace, the United States Senate, is not exactly known for its
thrill-a-minute dynamism. But through his long evolution from outraged
outsider to mainstream man in a suit, Mr. Sanders has remained true to his
original message: sympathy for the downtrodden, the impoverished and the
disenfranchised in the face of the rich and the powerful.

Back then, he was part of a crowd of like-minded young people who converged
on Burlington at a time when America seemed to be rewriting its history on
the spot. Students, hippies, labor organizers, trust fund kids, urban
escapees, impoverished anti-Vietnam War campaigners and environmentalists
yearning to be closer to the land — they came because they believed that
change was coming and that they had found the right place for a revolution.

Mr. Sanders was barely 30, full of restless energy, with wild curly hair, a
brash Brooklyn manner and a mind fizzing with plans to remake the world.
Short on money but long on ideas, he found employment where he could,
supporting himself through odd jobs like carpentry work.

“Freelance journalist” has always been on the list of things he did before
he began running for statewide office, futilely, as a Liberty Union Party
candidate in the 1970s. But the description is a bit of a stretch. A look
through his journalistic output, such as it was, reveals that he had
perhaps a dozen pieces published — interviews, essays, state-of-the-nation
diatribes — most in The Freeman.

They provide a useful insight into the formative thinking of the man who
would go on to become Burlington’s first socialist mayor, then a senator
and now a presidential candidate who is drawing crowds in the thousands
with his unapologetic leftist message. The writings also reflect the
particular mood in this one little spot in Vermont in an era of
extraordinary turmoil in America, when the social fabric seemed in danger
of ripping apart over issues like the Vietnam War, race and poverty.

Among Mr. Sanders’s efforts was a 1972 essay on sexual politics, “Man — and
Woman,” which drew unflattering attention recently after Mother Jones
magazine included it in an article about him. Its opening passage, which
deals with men’s sexual fantasies, is meant to be satirically provocative
but comes across as crassly sexist. (Mr. Sanders’s underlying point,
expressed less feverishly further down in the article, is that men and
women should rethink how they deal with each other.)

Another essay mocked what Mr. Sanders felt to be the soul-destroying nature
of conventional education.

“If children of 5 are not taught to obey orders, sit still for 7 hours a
day, respect their teacher, and raise their hands when they have to go to
the bathroom, how will they learn (after 17 more years of education) to
become the respectful clerks, technicians and soldiers who keep our society
free, our economy strong, and such inspiring men as Richard Nixon and Deane
Davis in political office,” Mr. Sanders wrote, referring to the United
States president and the Vermont governor at the time.

People in Mr. Sanders’s circle back then remember visiting the future
senator at his small apartment in Burlington. “It was subsistence living,”
said Greg Guma, the author of “The People’s Republic: Vermont and the
Sanders Revolution.”

Mr. Guma knew the young Mr. Sanders as a kitchen-table fulminator and
political organizer, not as a writer. At their first meeting, he recalled,
Mr. Sanders “kind of berated me” when Mr. Guma asked who he was.

“He said he was unimportant and it was all about the movement, and then it
kind of escalated. ‘If you don’t support the movement, I don’t want your
vote,’ ” Mr. Guma said. “Obviously he’s become more adept at cultivating
voters.”

Mr. Sanders’s pieces in The Freeman were consistent with the newspaper’s
ethos. The paper, which had humble production values and cost $10 for a
year’s subscription in 1971, was founded in 1969 by Roger L. Albright, a
former minister, as a place for like-minded leftists to opine in outraged
tones about the issues of the day. Often, apparently, they did it for free.

“Pay? You gotta be kidding — I don’t recall ever getting paid,” said Marvin
Fishman, now 77, who wrote about prison issues for the paper. (He had spent
a year in prison on a marijuana charge.)

“We were broke, they were broke, everybody was broke,” said Frank Kochman,
who was recruited for the paper when Mr. Albright rescued his stranded
Volkswagen bug from a snowbank, and who was its general manager and
co-publisher from 1971 to 1973. “If we had a little money, we’d try to pay
something.”

Mr. Sanders contributed pieces only sporadically. He interviewed a “labor
agitator” and an old-time farmer, and he wrote some articles about health,
including one in which he cited studies claiming that cancer could be
caused by psychological factors such as unresolved hostility toward one’s
mother, a tendency to bury aggression beneath a “facade of pleasantness”
and having too few orgasms.

“Sexual adjustment seemed to be very poor in those with cancer of the
cervix,” he wrote, quoting a study in a journal called Psychosomatic
Medicine.

One article, to observe the 10th anniversary of the Cuban revolution,
argued that despite its many failings, Cuba had made great progress in
health care and education. “The American press and mass media have been
stepping up their usual distorted and inaccurate reporting,” Mr. Sanders
wrote.

In a piece titled “Reflections on a Dying Society,” he declared that the
United States was virtually going to hell in a handcart. Its food was laden
with chemicals; its environment was being ruined; the threat of nuclear
annihilation or “death by poison gas” was increasing; people were suffering
from malaise and “psychosomatic disease”; citizens were being coerced and
duped by the government and the advertising industry; and the economy was
based on “useless” goods “designed to break down or used for the slaughter
of people.”

“The general social situation, to say the least,” he wrote, “does not look
good.”

Later in the 1970s, Mr. Sanders took a steady job with a Liberty Union
colleague making filmstrips about important events in American history,
many from the colonial period, and selling them door-to-door to schools.
(He also made a half-hour film about his hero, Eugene V. Debs, the labor
organizer who ran unsuccessfully for president five times.) They worked on
a shoestring out of Mr. Sanders’s house, said the colleague, Ron MacNeil.

“I think our motivation was that we were interested in American history,”
Mr. MacNeil said.

But that was after Mr. Sanders had run, and lost, various statewide races
as a Liberty Union candidate. By 1972, when he ran as the party’s candidate
for senator and governor (he lost both races by very wide margins), he had
begun publishing The Movement, an occasional newsletter.

He put together the whole thing himself, said Doris Lake, another early
Liberty Union candidate, and focused on the issues that were consuming him.
One edition included a letter Ms. Lake had written to her supervisor, and
had shown to Mr. Sanders, complaining about working conditions in the
eyeglass-lens factory where she worked the night shift, Ms. Lake said.

But for Mr. Sanders, everything was about ideas to make the world better,
both in real life and in The Movement.

“I believe there was a lot of editorializing on philosophy,” Ms. Lake said.
“At the time, we were thinking that the important thing in politics was to
educate people, to get them to understand what was happening in the world,
rather than to get elected.”

*Bernie Sanders seen as a ‘protest candidate,’ says Democratic rival Martin
O’Malley
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/03/bernie-sanders-seen-as-a-protest-candidate-says-democratic-rival-martin-omalley/>
// WaPo // John Wagner – July 3, 2015 *

Democratic presidential hopeful Martin O’Malley, whose own poll numbers
haven’t really budged since entering the race, says his rival Bernie
Sanders is on the rise partly because voters see him as a “protest
candidate.”

“I’m not running for protest candidate, I’m running for president of the
United States,” the former Maryland governor said in an interview Thursday
night following a campaign stop here that is part of a three-day swing
through Iowa to highlight his proposals on climate change.

Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist who rails against the
political influence of the “billionaire class,” has seen his crowds swell
in recent weeks, and he is gaining ground on Democratic front-runner
Hillary Rodham Clinton in polls in both Iowa and New Hampshire.

Sanders, an independent senator from Vermont, has said repeatedly that he
is running to win the Democratic nomination and the presidency.

On Wednesday, he drew about 10,000 people to a rally in Madison, Wis., the
largest of the 2016 cycle by any presidential candidate. In a poll of
likely Iowa caucusgoers released Thursday, Clinton was leading Sanders, 52
percent to 33 percent. O’Malley, who aides say is using the summer to
become better known, was at 3 percent in the Quinnipiac poll.

Asked what he makes of Sanders’s appeal, O’Malley said: “I think it shows
the widespread desire for an alternative to this year’s inevitable
front-runner.”

“It doesn’t terribly surprise me,” O’Malley said. “People feel like big
money has subsumed, taken over, their politics, and they’re frustrated by
it. … People feel like their voices don’t matter. People feel like they’re
not being heard, and right now, they want to protest about that.”

Asked if he sees Sanders as a protest candidate, O’Malley said: “I think
there’s an element of it … yeah.”

O’Malley said the popularity among Republicans of Donald Trump, the
businessman turned presidential candidate, reflects a similar phenomenon.

On Thursday, Sanders’s campaign said he had raised $15 million during the
last quarter. That’s about one-third of the amount Clinton’s campaign said
she raised for her committee during the same period, but Sanders’s take is
expected to far outpace what O’Malley and other Democrats in the field have
raised.

*Bernie who?
<http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/bernie-who-119721.html?ml=tl_3> //
Politico // Gabriel Debenedetti – July 3, 2015 *

Bernie Sanders is winning a third of the vote in Iowa and New Hampshire,
according to the latest polls. Nearly 10,000 people showed up at his
Wisconsin rally this week. Roughly 250,000 small donors have contributed to
his campaign.

At Hillary Clinton’s Brooklyn HQ, it’s as if they’ve never heard of him.

The Clinton campaign is reading straight from the front-runner’s playbook
when dealing with the socialist Vermont senator. Her staff insists it’s
taking Sanders’ polling bump seriously while showing no signs of changing
its long-charted course. There are no new plans to attack Sanders, no
alterations of the forthcoming policy roll-outs that will dot the summer
calendar, and no expected leftward sprints to match him policy-for-policy.
She doesn’t even mention his name on the campaign trail.

Instead, the former secretary of state’s political operation is making a
show of its organizational muscle and safeguarding its position beyond the
early-voting states. Far from sweating over reports of standing-room-only
crowds at the Vermonter’s events, the Clinton campaign is breathing a quiet
sigh of relief that it’s Sanders — and not a potentially more viable
primary opponent like Elizabeth Warren — nipping at its heels this summer.
The senator’s name pops up in conversations at Clinton’s Brooklyn
headquarters, but he’s not the topic of the day, week, or month — not even
in the candidate’s chats with donors, who are keeping a close tab on the
state of play.

“No one’s hair is on fire about him,” explained Maria Cardona, a national
Democratic strategist who remains in close touch with the Clinton camp
after working for Hillary’s 2008 campaign. “Not even the nose hairs.
Nothing.”

Now that Clinton’s sprint to fill her campaign coffers by the end of the
fundraising quarter is finished, the former secretary of state will begin
periodically unveiling detailed policy proposals throughout the summer, up
to the first primary debate in the fall. Her team has indicated that she
will increasingly go after her Republican opponents by name — as she has
started doing over the last month — but that she will in all likelihood
avoid granting Sanders or any of her other Democratic rivals the dose of
attention that would come with a direct barb from the dominating favorite.

That’s been the plan at least since Clinton set the date for her June New
York City kickoff rally, long before a CNN/WMUR poll showed Sanders within
eight points of her in New Hampshire last week and a Quinnipiac poll this
week showed Sanders with by far his best showing yet in Iowa — 33 percent.

Clinton allies are quick to point out that they’ve expected a close primary
since the start of the campaign — the team’s first memo to its surrogates
in April outlined how to project that very message — and accordingly there
was a broad-strokes plan in place accounting for a rival’s rise, even if
many were surprised with its vigor or the challenger’s identity.

The explanation for the Sanders surge, Democrats aligned with Clinton and
some who are unaffiliated say, is that he has largely captured the share of
voters who had previously expressed a preference for Warren, who’s not
running. In that way, he’s consolidated the anti-Clinton crowd.

“Everyone who’s worked in Democratic politics knows there’s a 30-to-40
percent vote that’s the ‘anybody but the frontrunner’ share,” explained
Chris Lehane, a veteran of Bill Clinton’s campaigns who is now helping
Hillary raise money.

And because many Clinton allies inside and outside of Brooklyn dismiss
Sanders’ chances to mount a long-term challenge due to his liberal politics
and troubles connecting with large portions of the Democratic base — like
minority voters — they say they’re relieved Warren’s supporters have swung
to him, rather than another candidate.

“The fact that it’s Bernie is fantastic, because Bernie is perfectly wired
for this role,” said another national Democratic operative close to the
campaign. “Everything about Bernie conveys the opportunity and limitations
of his candidacy. It’s perfect for him, it’s perfect for the Clinton
campaign, and it’s good for the party. I don’t think Democrats are wringing
their hands saying, ‘what if Bernie wins?’”

As such, Clinton has avoided actively antagonizing Sanders or the voters
backing him — in fact, some allies were annoyed when Missouri Sen. Claire
McCaskill, a Clinton supporter, attacked Sanders for his left-wing views on
MSNBC last week.

Among campaign fundraisers and surrogates, there is very little appetite
for a direct fight with Sanders, whose supporters Clinton would need
against a Republican opponent come November 2016.

“Hillary supporters that have run for election often like myself — I’m
12-2, if I was a pitcher I’d be worth about $15 million a year — we’re
saying, ‘stay the course. Bernie Sanders is not going to be the nominee,’”
said former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell.

Clinton, whose campaign even declined to publicly promote the endorsement
of Sanders’ home-state governor, Peter Shumlin, has shown no signs of
deviating from its plan. At her first public appearance after the New
Hampshire poll’s release, for example, she refused to mention the
Vermonter, instead railing against Donald Trump. Former bank executive
Robert Wolf, a Democratic donor, said Sanders’ name didn’t come up once
during a two-hour meeting he had with Clinton last week.

There is one insurance policy, however, that belies the idea that the
Sanders’ challenge is inconsequential: Last week the Clinton campaign hired
Jeff Berman, the consultant who built Obama’s delegate-winning strategy in
2008. It also held a weekend of grassroots actions across the country —
from local meetings to canvasses — to demonstrate its reach in states that
could matter if the primary were to stretch past the first four
early-voting ones.

But as long as history repeats itself — the Clinton campaign’s refrain is
that no non-Iowan has broken 50 percent in that state’s Democratic caucus —
early-state supporters insist Clinton should be fine.

“I did this with John Kerry, I did this with Al Gore,” said New Hampshire
lawyer Billy Shaheen, the husband of Sen. Jeanne Shaheen and a close
Clinton friend. “When I was running their campaigns in New Hampshire they
both went from 20-point leads to 20-point deficits. Deficits! In December
2003, the whole press had written John Kerry off because he was in single
digits, and the election was 35 days away.”

Bob Shrum, who played top roles in both of those campaigns, agreed: “This
could be like Gore-Bradley, where Bradley in September ’99 looked like a
real challenger. Gore then won Iowa overwhelmingly, New Hampshire closely,
and then every other primary and caucus.”

And, he added, echoing the sentiments of Clinton-allied Democrats who
refuse to acknowledge Sanders as a serious rival. “Kerry was written out
before coming back in Iowa in part because Iowans got serious and said,
‘Who’s a plausible candidate against Bush?’ There’s something about
Bernie’s personality that’s attractive to people, and I believe he’ll go to
the convention with a reasonable number of delegates. But do I think that
means Hillary Clinton should declare all-out war on him? No.”

*AFL-CIO leader tries to quell pro-Sanders revolt
<http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/afl-cio-endorsement-2016-democratic-primary-119701.html?ml=tl_17>
// Politico // Brian Mahoney – July 3, 2015 *

Richard Trumka has a message for state and local AFL-CIO leaders tempted to
endorse Bernie Sanders: Don’t.

In a memo this week to state, central and area divisions of the labor
federation, and obtained by POLITICO, the AFL-CIO chief reminded the groups
that its bylaws don’t permit them to “endorse a presidential candidate” or
“introduce, consider, debate, or pass resolutions or statements that
indicate a preference for one candidate over another.” Even “‘personal’
statements” of candidate preference are verboten, Trumka said.

The memo comes amid signs of a growing split between national union leaders
— mindful of the fact that Clinton remains the undisputed favorite for the
nomination — and local officials and rank and file, who are increasingly
drawn to the Democratic Party’s growing progressive wing, for whom Sanders
is the latest standard-bearer.

The South Carolina and Vermont AFL-CIOs have passed resolutions supporting
Sanders, and some local AFL-CIO leaders in Iowa want to introduce a
resolution at their August convention backing the independent senator from
Vermont. More than a thousand labor supporters, including several local
AFL-CIO-affiliated leaders, have signed on to “Labor for Bernie,” a group
calling on national union leaders to give Sanders a shot at an endorsement.

The AFL-CIO’s constituent unions — as distinct from divisions of the
federation itself — remain free to make endorsements however they wish. But
they can’t make those endorsements acting through local and regional
divisions of the AFL-CIO, as Trumka reminded everyone in the memo.

His message wasn’t anything new for the federation’s state leaders: They
know that endorsement decisions belong to the national leadership. Still,
it was unusual for Trumka to call them out in a memo. “I’m not sure I’ve
ever seen one before like this,” said Jeff Johnson, the president of the
AFL-CIO’s Washington state labor council.

Johnson agreed that it was important for the AFL-CIO to speak with a single
voice. But “there’s a lot of anxiety out there in the labor movement,” he
said, “and we’re desperately searching for a candidate that actually speaks
to working-class values. The Elizabeth Warren/Bernie Sanders camp is very,
very attractive to many of our members and to many of us as leaders,
because they’re talking about the things that need to happen in this
country.”

Similarly, Massachusetts AFL-CIO President Steven Tolman said he agreed
that Trumka had to lay down the law. More tellingly, though, he added:
“Bernie Sanders has spent his life actually fighting for working people.
He’s made no secret of it, and he’s used it as his mantra. And that I
respect very much.” When asked about Clinton’s candidacy, Tolman was less
effusive: “Who? Who? Please. I mean with all respect, huh?”

Other state-level union leaders affiliated with the AFL-CIO didn’t bother
to give Trumka and his memo lip service. “I was disappointed by it,” said
UPTE-CWA Local 9119 organizing coordinator Lisa Kermish, of Berkeley,
California. “I think that local unions and national unions, while it’s
important to work together for strength, I think that this is in some ways
truncating dialogue. And I find that very unfortunate.”

The memo surfaced a day before top staffers for Clinton and Sanders
participated in a meet-and-greet with AFL-CIO political directors Thursday
morning in Washington. A person who attended the meeting said those present
included Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook, Clinton labor liaison Nikki
Budzinski, Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver and top Sanders strategist
Tad Devine.

Under AFL-CIO procedures governing endorsements, a political committee
makes a recommendation to the executive council in Washington, which then
submits it for ratification by leaders of its member unions. A two-thirds
majority is required.

“Because in years past, and already this year, a number of questions have
been raised,” Trumka wrote in his memo, “I want to remind you all that the
AFL-CIO endorsement for president and vice president belongs to the
national AFL-CIO. State federations, central and area labor councils, and
all other subordinate bodies must follow the national AFL-CIO endorsement
regarding president and vice president.”

The process is typically a cautious one. In the last presidential election,
the federation endorsed President Barack Obama in March 2012, shortly
before he locked up renomination. In 2008, it waited to endorse then-Sen.
Obama until late June, after he’d accumulated the necessary delegates. In
2004, it endorsed John Kerry in February — before he locked up the
nomination but at a time when Kerry was well ahead in the delegate count.

Sen. Bernie Sanders speaks with AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka while
participating in a "Don't Trade Our Future" march in April. | Getty

“That’s the formal process of the AFL-CIO,” said Larry Cohen, former
president of the Communication Workers of America. “But, of course, across
the country there is a huge surge of union members and of working class
people stepping up for Bernie.”

Cohen announced his own endorsement of Sanders in a Huffington Post op-ed
Wednesday. Cohen, CWA President Chris Shelton and American Postal Workers
Union President Mark Dimondstein will host Sanders at APWU July 13, one day
before national union leaders meet with Clinton at the home of her campaign
chairman, John Podesta.

Sanders supporters hope they can convince the AFL-CIO to withhold a primary
endorsement from Clinton, as it did in 2008. “Most people kind of assume
there’s an AFL-CIO endorsement in the primaries. Not so,” said Steve
Rosenthal, former political director of the AFL-CIO and president of the
progressive Organizing Group.

Indeed, the Iowa AFL convention Aug. 5-8, which Trumka is set to attend,
may become a major showdown between Sanders and Clinton for labor’s
support. Clinton and Obama both showed up there in 2007.

Trumka, meanwhile, said the AFL-CIO had sent questionnaires to Democrats
and Republicans with a Friday deadline. The federation also plans to set
aside time at its July executive council meeting to interview candidates,
the memo said.

*Is Bernie Sanders Too Radical for America?
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-dreier/is-bernie-sanders-too-radical-for-america_b_7711452.html>
// HuffPo /// Peter Dreier – July 3, 2015 *

Now that Bernie Sanders is rapidly climbing in the polls and attracting
huge audiences to his campaign events (including over 10,000 people at a
Madison, Wisconsin rally the other day), his opponents are starting to
attack him for being too radical. After all, Sanders describes himself as a
democratic socialist.

Of course, few Americans know what "socialist" means. Some mistakenly
associate it with Communism. In fact, Sanders has often said that he
supports the kind of policies favored by the Scandinavian democracies.

Asked about this in May by George Stephanopoulos, host of ABC News' This
Week, Sanders said:

In countries in Scandinavia like Denmark, Norway, Sweden, they are very
democratic countries. Voter turnout is a lot higher than it is in the
United States. In those countries, health care is the right of all people;
college education and graduate school is free; retirement benefits, child
care are stronger than the United States of America. In those countries by
and large government works for ordinary people and the middle class, rather
than, as is the case right now in our country, for the billionaire class.

On the campaign trail in Iowa, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, and elsewhere,
many voters appear to be willing to look past the labels and listen to what
Sanders is actually saying about the issues and the role of government in
society. The Vermont Senator with a New York accent has a straight-talking
style that resonates with many voters who don't necessarily identify
themselves as liberals or progressives, much less as socialists.

For example, at a recent Sanders rally in New Hampshire that attracted an
unexpectedly large crowd, Sanders "railed against the 'billionaire class'
and pledged to make large corporations pay their fair share of taxes if he
becomes president. But much of his message focused on improving the lot of
the lower and middle classes--by providing free college; guaranteeing
workers vacation time, sick leave and family leave; and raising the minimum
wage to $15 an hour," the Washington Post reported.

"I don't believe it is a terribly radical idea to say that someone who
works 40 hours a week should not be living in poverty," Sanders told the
standing-room-only audience.

The Gallup Poll has regularly asked Americans what types of candidates they
would willingly elect. Gallup's question is quite simple: "If your party
nominated a generally well-qualified person for president who happened to
be _____, would you vote for that person?"

Over the years, Gallup found significant increases in the proportion of
Americans who say "yes" to voting for a woman, an African American, a Jew,
a Catholic, and a gay or lesbian candidate.

Although socialists have run for president, and been elected to various
public offices from city council to Congress since the early 1900s, Gallup
didn't add that category of candidate to the list until this June, no doubt
in recognition of Sanders' campaign. It found that 47 percent of Americans
say they would vote for a socialist for president and 50 percent say they
would not. In the poll, 59 percent of Democrats, 49 percent of
independents, and, perhaps surprisingly, 26 percent of Republicans report
that they'd vote to put a socialist in the White House.

After more than half a century of Cold War hysteria and post-Cold War
propaganda against socialism from the business and education
establishments, the mainstream media, and both political parties, the fact
that almost half of Americans are willing to vote for a socialist for
president is quite remarkable.

Not surprisingly, those who came of age in the Cold War era are less likely
to consider voting for a socialist candidate. Gallup found that 34 percent
of those 65 and older, 37 percent of 50-64 year olds, and 50 percent of
30-49 year olds would vote for a socialist. In contrast, 69 percent of
18-29 year olds indicated that they'd vote for a socialist for the nation's
highest office-holder. Chalk that up to either youthful idealism or to a
profound shift in the young generation's political outlook that could have
a lasting influence as they get older.

Political scientists, pollsters, journalists, and pundits like to identify
voters and politicians with labels. But voters care less about labels --
conservative, moderate, liberal, progressive, socialist, or others. They
are more interested in what politicians want government to do. Ideas that
were once considered radical -- such as the vote for women, Social
Security, and the minimum wage -- are today taken for granted as common
sense.

So let's look instead at what Americans actually believe and care about.

Polls show that Americans are upset with widening inequality, the political
influence of big business, and declining living standards. Public opinion
is generally favorable toward greater government activism to address
poverty, inequality, opportunity, and climate change.

Most Americans worry that government has been captured by the powerful and
wealthy. They want a government that serves the common good. They also want
to reform government to make it more responsive and accountable.

On those matters--both broad principles and specific policy
prescriptions--Sanders is in sync with the vast majority of Americans.

Big Business

About three-quarters (74 percent) of Americans--including 84 percent of
Democrats, 72 percent of independents, and 62 percent of
Republicans--believe that corporations have too much influence on American
life and politics today, according to a recent New York Times/CBS News
poll. In contrast, only 37 percent think that labor unions exercise too
much influence.

The Pew Research Center discovered that 60 percent of Americans--including
75 percent of Democrats--believe that "the economic system in this country
unfairly favors the wealthy."

Fifty-eight percent of Americans say they would support breaking up "big
banks like Citigroup," a key plank of Sanders' platform and the goal of a
bill that Sanders sponsored in the Senate.

Seventy-three percent of Americans favor tougher rules for Wall Street
financial companies, versus 17 percent who oppose stronger regulation.

Sixty-four percent of Americans strongly or somewhat favor regulating
greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, factories and cars and
requiring utilities to generate more power from "clean" low-carbon sources.

Progressive Taxation

More than three-quarters of Americans (79 percent) think that wealthy
people don't pay their fair share of taxes, while 82 percent believe that
some corporations don't pay their fair share of taxes.

Sixty-eight percent of Americans favor raising taxes on people earning more
than $1 million per year, including 87 percent of Democrats, 65 percent of
independents, and 53 percent of Republicans.

Inequality and Poverty

A strong majority (66 percent) say that wealth should be more evenly
divided and that it is a problem that should be addressed urgently.

Ninety-two percent of Americans want a society with far less income
disparity than currently exists in the United States. Americans prefer some
inequality to perfect equality, according to the professors at the Harvard
Business School and Duke University who conducted the survey. But when
asked to pick an ideal level of income disparity, Americans prefer the more
egalitarian level similar to the one in Sweden (although without
identifying the country by name) to that in the U.S. What's more, the rich
and the poor, and Democrats and Republicans, are almost equally likely to
choose the Swedish model. For example, 93.5 percent of Democrats and 90.2
percent of Republicans preferred the level of income distribution that
exists in Sweden.

Sixty-nine percent of Americans--including 90 percent of Democrats, 69
percent of independents, and 45 percent of Republicans--believe that the
government should help reduce the gap between the rich and everyone else.
Eighty-two percent of Americans--including 94 percent of Democrats, 83
percent of independents, and 64 percent of Republicans--think the
government should help reduce poverty.

Money in Politics

Eighty-four percent of Americans think that money has too much influence in
politics. Slightly more Americans (85 percent) want an overhaul of our
campaign finance system

Seventy-eight percent of Americans think that campaign spending by outside
groups not affiliated with candidates should be limited by law.

A majority of Americans (54 percent) believe that money given to political
candidates is not a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment.
In other words, they disagree with the Supreme Court's Citizens United
ruling.

Minimum Wage and Workers' Rights

A recent poll by Hart Research Associates found that 75 percent of
Americans (including 53 percent of Republicans) support an increase in the
federal minimum wage to $12.50 an hour by 2020. Sixty-three percent of
Americans support an even greater increase in the minimum wage to $15 an
hour by 2020.

Eighty percent of Americans favor requiring employers to offer paid leave
to parents of new children and employees caring for sick family members. An
even larger number (85 percent) favor requiring employers to offer paid
leave to employees who are ill.

A significant majority of Americans support the right of workers to
unionize, despite several decades of corporate-sponsored anti-union
propaganda. Eighty-two percent believe that factory and manufacturing
workers should have the right to unionize. A vast majority also support the
right to unionize for transportation workers (74 percent), police and
firefighters (72 percent), public school teachers (71 percent), workers in
supermarkets and retail sales (68 percent), and fast food workers (62
percent).

Health Care and Social Security

Over 50 percent of Americans (including one-quarter of Republicans and
nearly 80 percent of Democrats) say they support a single-payer "Medicare
for All" approach to health insurance, something Sanders has long
advocated. Only 36 percent oppose the idea. 12 percent are neutral.

Seventy-one percent Americans support a public option, which would give
individuals the choice of buying healthcare through Medicare or private
insurers. This was part of Obama's original health care plan in 2010 but
the insurance industry lobby killed it, thanks to every Senate Republican
and a handful of Senate Democrats, led by former Senator Max Baucus of
Montana.

The Gallup poll found that 67 percent of Americans want to lift the income
cap on Social Security to require higher-income workers to pay Social
Security taxes on all of their wages. Most people don't realize that
workers who earn more than $118,500 a year don't contribute on their full
income and that simply removing that tax loophole for high earners would
close the lion's share of Social Security's modest long-term funding gap.
Legislation introduced by Senator Sanders and Representative Peter DeFazio
of Oregon would apply the same payroll tax already paid by more than nine
out of 10 Americans to those with incomes over $250,000 a year. Census
Bureau data shows that only about 5 percent (1 in 18) of workers would pay
more if the cap were scrapped, and only the top 1.4 percent (one in 71
workers) would be affected if the tax were applied to earnings over
$250,000.

Higher Education

More than three-quarters (79 percent) of Americans think that education
beyond high school is not affordable for everyone in the U.S. who needs it.
Seventy-seven percent believe that higher education institutions should
reduce tuition and fees, while 59 percent and 55 percent respectively agree
that state governments and the federal government should provide more
assistance. The average tuition bill for students at a public four-year
college has increased by more than 250 percent over the past three decades.
More than one-third (35 percent) of 2000-2014 college graduates report
graduating with more than $25,000 in undergraduate student loan debt, in
inflation-adjusted dollars. The recently graduated college class of 2015
has an average debt burden of $35,051 per student, the highest ever.
Sanders introduced legislation to make four-year public colleges and
universities tuition-free, paid for through a tax on Wall Street
transactions.

Same-Sex Marriage

Today, 60 percent of Americans believe it should be legal for gay and
lesbian couples to marry, according to Gallup, a figure that is likely to
increase following the Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage.
But in 1996, only 27 percent felt that way. That year, then-Congressman
Sanders was one of only 67 House members to vote against the Defense of
Marriage Act, which barred federal recognition of gay marriages.

America seems to be holding its breath, trying to decide what kind of
country it wants to be. We seem to be at one of those crossroads moments
when attitudes are rapidly shifting and significant reform is possible.

But public opinion, on its own, doesn't translate into public policy. It
has to be mobilized. That's what movements do. And that's what elections
are for.

*The real reasons Bernie Sanders is transforming the election: Here’s why
he galvanizes the left
<http://www.salon.com/2015/07/03/the_real_reasons_bernie_sanders_is_transforming_the_election_heres_why_he_galvanizes_the_left/>
// Salon // Sophia Tesfaye – July 3, 2015 *

CNN dubbed this “the summer of Sanders” as media outlets finally picked up
on the large crowds Independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has
attracted during campaign stops. His rocketing poll numbers in early
primary states like Iowa and New Hampshire led to countless stories
heralding a Sanders surge — but the story is as much about the issues as it
is about the man.

Even Republican candidates have taken notice of Sanders’ rise. Ahead of a
recent stop in Madison, Wisconsin, likely 2016 contender and Wisconsin
Governor Scott Walker welcomed Sanders to the state with a series of tweets
attacking the democratic socialist once dismissed as too fringe. Walker may
not have taken too fondly to Sanders attracting a record 10,000 people in
his home state.

But Sanders’ campaign, surely more so than that of any of the Republican
candidates, seems to be gaining traction more for the ideas he espouses
than because of a cult of personality.

Granted, many supporters have pointed to Sanders’ straightforward manner
and willingness to call out bad actors as refreshingly appealing, but
unlike with Republican presidential candidates Donald Trump and Chris
Christie, it isn’t just a brash style that’s being sold. Sanders makes a
direct effort to address many of the issues that have arisen since the Hope
& Change campaign of 2008 and it appears as though he is tapping into very
real and long-simmering sentiments in the Democratic base.

More than a protest vote against Hillary Clinton, as some have suggested,
Sanders’ support appears to be support for issues Clinton’s yet to fully
address. Here are some of the ways that Sanders is gaining support by
leading on issues or movements that other candidates ignore:

VA Scandal

Sanders was chairman of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee when
Democrats last controlled the chamber, and following the VA scandal,
Sanders worked with Republicans in the House to pass legislation that
expands health care access for veterans and makes it easier to fire
underperforming officials.

His record and work on veterans’ affairs issues has earned Sanders top
awards from the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the American Legion and the
Military Officers Association of America, and now it appears as though that
recognition is translating to support for his campaign.

The Boston Globe writes that Sanders’ “surge is partly fueled by veterans,”
citing “entire Reddit threads [that] are dedicated to how veterans can best
pitch Sanders to other veterans” and “a Facebook page promoting Sanders to
veterans.” As the Globe notes, in the early voting state of South Carolina
veterans make up about 11 percent of the electorate.

Occupy Wall Street

The short-lived global protest movement suddenly shifted the national
debate in the aftermath of the recession from talk of austerity to a focus
on growing income inequality by introducing terms like the 1 Percent to
national prominence in time for the 2012 campaign. But the Occupy Wall
Street movement achieved no great legislative win, and after the
encampments were broken down many of the grievances remained
unacknowledged, let alone addressed.

Sanders’ 2016 campaign embodies much of the demands of the OWS movement.
Speaking to the largest campaign crowd of this cycle in Wisconsin this
week, Sanders said, “The big money interests — Wall Street, corporate
America, all of these guys — have so much power that no president can
defeat them unless there is an organized grassroots movement making them an
offer they can’t refuse.” For activists who organized, protested and camped
out in Zuccotti Park and squares across America, this message of unfinished
business is powerful. The acknowledgement of a continued struggle and
willingness to put up a fight is what was galvanized the Draft Warren
movement and it has now seemingly shifted to Sanders.

Student Debt Movement

Some Occupy Wall Street activists joined a movement against student debt,
which has now surpassed $1 trillion in the U.S. The activists, some of whom
had refused to make any more payments on their federal student loans,
achieved a major victory this year when Corinthian colleges (you know them
by their annoying commercials hawking their schools like Everest, Heald and
WyoTech) shuttered the last of their remaining U.S. campuses, and the
erasure of $13 million in debt. The movement has successfully overseen the
closure of campuses in Canada the year before.

Sanders has proposed the College for All Act, a plan to provide
tuition-free education at public colleges funded by a small tax on Wall
Street transactions.

Citizens United

Since the 2010 Supreme Court ruling allowing unlimited political
contributions by corporations and unions saw the rise of the Super PAC in
electoral campaigns, Americans are shockingly united in their opposition to
such obscene levels of money in politics. The overwhelming majority of
Americans, including Republicans, support limits on campaign contributions.

Sanders is the only candidate to have completely sworn off all Super PAC
funds, although a couple of independent political action committees have
formed in support of his candidacy.

But Sanders has objected to their existence, saying, “A major problem of
our campaign finance system is that anybody can start a super PAC on behalf
of anybody and can say anything. And this is what makes our current
campaign finance situation totally absurd.”

Obamacare

The Supreme Court may have upheld the Affordable Care Act twice, but the
political battle over the health care law promises to rage on five years
after its passage. With health care costs rising only marginally more
slowly than they before the law’s passage and a continuation of premium
increases, even Democrats who support the law have called for marked
improvements as millions of Americans are left uninsured because Republican
lawmakers refuse to expand Medicaid.

Sanders has promised to return the debate to early 2007, when during the
Democratic presidential primary the public option was on the table. Sanders
has long called for a “Medicare-for-all” single-payer health care plan
similar to what was tossed aside as too radical shortly after the talks
began on health care reform once Obama took office.

*Bernie Sanders out-greens Hillary Clinton: Will she be able to hold her
own in a climate hawk runoff
<http://www.salon.com/2015/07/03/bernie_sanders_out_greens_hillary_clinton_will_she_be_able_to_hold_her_own_in_a_climate_hawk_runoff/>
// Salon // Lindsay Abrams – July 3, 2015 *

Now that President Obama has established that the executive branch can and
should take a strong stance on climate change, it’s safe to say emissions
reductions and the like are key issues for the Democratic candidates vying
to be his successor. (In the Republican primaries, calling climate change a
hoax or just ignoring the problem completely continues, somehow, to be
acceptable.) And as Bernie Sanders gains early momentum for his decidedly
left-of-center campaign, a big question is whether Hillary Clinton’s
climate platform can compete.

As far as most issues are concerned, there’s a bit of an “anything you can
do, I can do better” dynamic between the Democratic frontrunner and the
democratic socialist nipping at her heels. Both, to be sure, can boast of
their impressive environmental records — but while Clinton has a
respectable 82 percent lifetime score from the League of Conservation
Voters, Sanders’ is 95 percent, and the super PAC Climate Hawks Vote named
him the 113th Congress’s top climate leader. As the primaries heat up, the
differences between them just might illustrate the vast gulf between
someone who hits the right talking points and someone who understands the
true scope of what’s needed to prevent catastrophic climate change (in a
word: everything).

Vox’s David Roberts argues that in our current political climate, the
difference between their platforms might not matter much. “No president —
not Clinton, not Sanders, not the risen Christ — could persuade the House
GOP to pass aggressive restrictions on carbon,” he writes. Then again,
President Obama may not have Congress on his side, but he’s managed to do a
whole lot for climate action anyway. Where he’s proved to be a
disappointment has been in weighing the grave risks associated with climate
change on the one hand while waving Shell on to drill in the Arctic with
the other. If America’s going to lead the world in fighting climate change,
it’s going to need an executive branch ready to nix pipeline projects, to
shut down oil wells and to use the EPA to rein in as much carbon emissions
as possible. Even if Sanders can’t nudge Clinton to the left on climate
issues, he, along with Democratic contender Martin O’Malley, can at least
show voters what a truly Green platform looks like. (And if they can, as
Roberts suggests, make Clinton look centrist by comparison well, that’s not
so bad either.)

Here’s how their actions and promises compare thus far:

How seriously they take climate change

Clinton called it “the most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of
challenges we face as a nation and a world.”

Sanders’ campaign website asserts, “Unless we take bold action to address
climate change, our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren are
going to look back on this period in history and ask a very simple
question: Where were they? Why didn’t the United States of America, the
most powerful nation on earth, lead the international community in cutting
greenhouse gas emissions and preventing the devastating damage that the
scientific community was sure would come?”

Keystone XL pipeline

Clinton has been aggressively silent on whether or not she supports the
controversial pipeline, but back when she was Secretary of State, she said
she was “inclined” to approve it. The addition of former TransCanada
lobbyist Jeffrey Berman to her campaign is being read by some as an ominous
sign.

Sanders’ staunch opposition to the pipeline is vouched for by Bill
McKibben, a leader of the anti-Keystone movement. “He’s been the most
consistent and proactive voice in the entire Keystone fight,” McKibben
said. “Everything that’s been needed — from speeches on the floor to
legislation to demands that the State Department change its absurd review
process — he and his staff have done immediately and with a high degree of
professionalism.”

Offshore drilling

Clinton voted in favor of a 2006 bill that ended protections for Florida’s
Gulf Coast and opened up an additional 8 million acres in the Gulf for
offshore drilling.

Sanders wrote an op-ed for the Guardian in the aftermath of the BP oil
spill: The lesson, he wrote, is that “there must be no new offshore
drilling. Not now, not ever.” To that end, he introduced legislation that
would have banned offshore drilling along the coastlines.

Arctic drilling

Clinton does have a record of voting against efforts to open up protected
areas of the Arctic to oil and gas interests; she also supported a 2007 act
that would have conferred additional protections on the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge.

Sanders, too, has never been known to vote in favor of Arctic drilling. In
May, he signed a letter expressing disappointment in the Obama
administration’s decision to open offshore wells in the region.

Fracking

Clinton promoted fracking abroad during her tenure as Secretary of State,
ostensibly to fight climate change while adding to the global energy
supply. Domestically, she appears to support, if extremely cautiously, the
idea of natural gas as a bridge fuel: she expounded on its potential
benefits as compared to coal in a 2014 speech, although she did emphasize
the need to “put in place smart regulations and enforce them.”

Sanders, if you couldn’t guess, is an outspoken opponent of fracking. “I’m
very proud that the state of Vermont banned fracking,” he said last year
when the state of Vermont banned fracking. “I hope communities all over
America do the same.”

Clean Power Plan

Clinton came out strongly in support of the EPA’s efforts to limit
greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants during a 2014 speech
to the League of Conservation Voters. “As you know so well, power plants
account for about 40 percent of the carbon pollution in the United States,
and therefore must be addressed,” she told her audience. “And the
unprecedented action that President Obama has taken must be protected at
all cost” — a clear reference to the near-certainty that a GOP president
would try to dismantle it.

Sanders, in defining his position in relation to Clinton, takes that a step
further: “It is not only supporting what the president has done;” he told
the Washington Post, “it is saying we’ve got to lead the world.”

Fossil fuel subsidies

Clinton, in that LCV speech, bemoaned the fact that “tax incentives for
alternative energy investments are unpredictable at best, while generous
subsidies for fossil fuels are still too easy to come by.” And while she
praised Obama’s efforts to phase out subsidies for dirty energy globally,
she added, “I know we can do better.”

Sanders recently introduced legislation in the Senate, the aptly named End
Polluter Welfare Act, that would end tax breaks and other subsidies for
oil, gas and coal altogether. It wasn’t the first time he’s tried that.

Green jobs

Clinton and Sanders teamed up to author the Green Jobs Act in 2007, which
dedicated funding to training in “green collar jobs” that involve the
“design, manufacture, installation, operation, and maintenance of
technologies associated with energy efficiency and renewable, clean energy
options.”

*‘Grassroots movement working’: Bernie Sanders gains on the Clinton machine
<http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/03/bernie-sanders-grassroots-movement-gains-clinton-machine>
// Guardian // Lauren Gambino and Ben Jacobs – July 3, 2015 *

What began as a progressive pipe dream – that a rabble-rousing senator from
the nation’s second least populous state could wrest the Democratic
presidential nomination from one of the most well-known politicians in
recent history – is starting to seem plausible.

By way of massive rallies, grassroots politicking and a record-setting
number small donations, Vermont senator Bernie Sanders is winning over
progressive voters, convincing them that his underdog campaign has a
fighting chance against Hillary Clinton’s well-oiled – and extraordinarily
well-funded – political machine.

On Thursday, the Sanders campaign announced it raised $15m since 30 April
from 250,000 donors, many of whom have made small contributions online. In
contrast, Barack Obama attracted only 180,000 donors during the first
quarter of his presidential campaign in 2007, which has been considered the
benchmark for online fundraising by an insurgent candidate in modern
presidential politics.

The senator, propelled by a groundswell of support, is also gaining ground
on Clinton in polls emerging from across the early voting states.

In Iowa, Sanders’ support has soared. A Quinnipiac poll released on
Thursday found that 33% of likely Democratic primary voters prefer Sanders,
which brings him within 19 points of Clinton, who is polling at 52%. In
May, the same poll showed Clinton leading Sanders by 45 points. And in New
Hampshire, Sanders trailed Clinton by just 8 points, according to the
latest CNN/WMUR poll.

But while Sanders continues to gain momentum and money, political observers
remain wary of whether the unkempt septuagenarian socialist can actually
defeat Clinton in the era of almost unlimited campaign spending, or whether
Democratic voters are just enjoying what one political operative in New
Hampshire this week called “a summer fling”.

Taking advantage of a rising populist tide

Sanders is not just persuading progressives to open their wallets: he has a
rabid fan base showing up to campaign events as well, drawing
larger-than-expected crowds across the country. At a rally on Wednesday
night, Sanders sounded almost taken aback by his welcome – nearly 10,000
supporters attended the Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Madison, Wisconsin,
to hear him speak.

“Tonight we have made a little bit of history,” Sanders, 73, told the
crowd. “Tonight we have more people at any meeting for a candidate of
president of the United States than any other candidate.”

One attendee at Sanders’ rally in Madison, Doug Fritsch of nearby Lake
Mills, told the Guardian that he was drawn to the senator because Sanders
“still sees a role for government to protect the lower and middle class”.
In contrast, he said he views Clinton as aligned with “more of the
corporate interests”.

Fritsch said he was impressed with the “enthusiastic” crowd at Wednesday’s
rally, which he saw as an effort to “a grassroots movement working” for
Sanders.

But Sanders isn’t just holding big rallies either: he is spending
significant time in early primary states and has already spent 15 days in
the first-in-the-nation primary state of New Hampshire alone – more than
any other Democratic candidate.

Adam Green, co-founder of Progressive Change Campaign Committee, a group
that has hailed the Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren as its “north
star”, said that Sanders is hitting the right notes for his left-wing base
with ideas on how to unburden college students from massive debt and tackle
wage inequality – and that Clinton would be wise to pay attention.

“Bernie Sanders is smartly taking advantage of the rising economic populist
tide,” Green said. “And the path to success for Hillary Clinton is to be
bold and populist in her campaign platform.”

Big crowds – but bigger dollars

Sanders’ campaign has evolved from a longshot ideological crusade to a
legitimate operation in a very short period of time. The campaign
essentially “started from scratch” in April when the senator made up his
mind to run, said Tad Devine, a senior adviser to Sanders. Devine said the
big-rally strategy has helped the candidate start building out a campaign
network. So far, he said, everyone has been “pleasantly surprised” at
Sanders’s reception.

“That style of campaigning, where there’s a give and take with voters,
where people come into an atmosphere where they can almost be in a
community setting, that’s something that Bernie’s very comfortable with,”
Devine told the Guardian. “We don’t have time to try to do the things that
we’re not adept at doing.”

But harnessing the senator’s momentum to pose a meaningful threat to
Clinton will remain a challenge.

On Wednesday, Clinton’s campaign announced that she has raised an estimated
$45m since declaring her candidacy in April.

“Many people doubted whether we could build an organization powered by so
many grassroots supporters,” Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook said in a
note to supporters on Wednesday. “Today’s announcement proves them wrong.”

Clinton’s campaign said details about who has donated to her campaign are
not yet available. A full accounting of her donations, as is the same for
all candidates, is due on 15 July in a filing to the Federal Exchange
Commission.

The Democratic frontrunner’s campaign has been heavily focused on raising
money. Clinton headlined 58 different fundraisers in 18 states since
declaring her candidacy in April. In contrast, she has held relatively few
public events – and small ones at that – and has yet to draw crowds of the
same magnitude as Sanders. Clinton’s one major rally in Iowa drew fewer
attendees than a nearby Sanders rally two days later; even Clinton’s formal
campaign launch in New York City was approximately the same size as
Sanders’s lakeside announcement in Burlington, Vermont.

The former secretary of state often communicates her policy positions via
Twitter, rather than speaking to reporters or voters. While Sanders held a
question and answer session on Thursday with over 100 voters in the gritty
industrial city of Fort Dodge, Iowa, Clinton spoke at a private fundraiser
in Provincetown, Massachusetts, a resort town on Cape Cod.

Clinton will also get help from the Priorities USA Super PAC, which is
backing her candidacy despite a pledge by the candidate to combat
“uncontrolled money” in politics, and announced Thursday that it has raised
$15.6m – bringing the coffers of her campaign and its allies beyond $60m so
far.

In contrast, Sanders, who rails against the “grotesque and obscene”
concentration of wealth in America, has refused to have a Super Pac support
him and is focused on wooing small-dollar donors.

Harvard University professor Lawrence Lessig, who founded a Super Pac to
end Super Pacs, said Sanders’ renouncing Super Pacs is tantamount to
“bringing a knife to a gunfight”.

“I regret the fact the Bernie Sanders has embraced the idea that he’s going
to live life like the Vermont snow, as pure as he possibly can, while he
runs for president, because it weakens his chances – and he’s an enormously
important progressive voice,” Lessig said.

That he will be outspent, Sanders admits, almost gleefully. That it will
hurt his chances of securing the Democratic nomination, the upstart
candidate disagrees.

“They may have the money but we have the people,” Sanders told the crowd in
Madison on Wednesday. “And when the people stand together, we can win.”

*A.B. Stoddard: Clinton’s feeling the Bern
<http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/246849-ab-stoddard-clintons-feeling-the-bern>
// The Hill // A.B. Stoddard – July 3, 2015 *

They said it couldn't be done.

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders's rocket rise from the brunt of jokes to an
official menace should be deeply concerning to Democrats who didn't see it
coming. With more boffo numbers — of record-setting crowds, strengthening
polling and an impressive campaign warchest – the scrappy socialist could
soon reach the level of threat.

It isn't likely Sanders will topple Hillary Clinton and win his party's
presidential nomination, but there is evidence of a more potent liberal
energy he successfully engages that she does not. Clinton thought she
caught a break when Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) decided against a run
but it seems her supporters are running to Sanders. Should Clinton fail to
stave off his surge, Sanders could not only embarrass her with strong
showings or wins in early primary contests but  may ultimately weaken her
for the general election next year. She should plan accordingly.

Sanders's gathering of 10,000 supporters gathered in Wisconsin Wednesday
night was larger than any crowd any presidential candidate has had all
year. In the latest Quinnipiac poll of Iowa voters Sanders is at 33 percent
to Clinton's 52, still behind but making solid gains. In May her lead was
60-15, which means in just two months he has more than doubled his support
there. What's more is that this is the first time her support has been
lower than 60 percent in that poll. Sanders's $15 million in donations in
two months also represents only one-third of Clinton's $45 million in three
months but far exceeds expectations and illustrates a level of grassroots
enthusiasm that no one is laughing at any more. As Clinton scrambled to
collect as many $2,700 checks as she could, worried that Jeb Bush was
collecting larger ones as a still undeclared candidate, Sanders was
counting dollar bills. His haul includes 250,000 donors making 400,000
donations of $250 or less, the average totalling $33.51.

The Sanders boomlet is rippling throughout the party and could potentially
alter the primary by more quickly choking off the candidacies of former
governors Martin O'Malley and Lincoln Chafee and now former Sen. Jim Webb
who strangely chose to jump in Thursday at the height of Bernie buzz. But
the most dangerous consequence could be that Sanders's popularity renders
Clinton vulnerable enough to invite a challenge from Vice President Biden.

At least for now the Clinton camp, while perhaps genuinely stunned, is
smart enough to be eating some humble pie, seeming to take Sanders
seriously.

"We're never going to have a coronation in my party," Clinton surrogate
Paul Begala said on CNN Thursday. "Never Never. Sen Sanders has tapped into
something real."

Of course this was supposed to be a coronation, the turn Clinton waited for
for eight years. It was one thing when Barack Obama, who Clinton insiders
and many party operatives dismissed as a threat, cut down Clinton's shot at
her dream in 2008 - he was the walk-on-water candidate from central
casting. Sanders, with his often too-liberated hair and a clunky accent, is
perhaps the last person anyone would cast as a potential giant killer.

Should he maintain his current trajectory eight months will be plenty of
time for an old-fashioned ass kicking. But Sanders doesn't have to win Iowa
on Feb. 1, 2016 - just coming close to Clinton there would be a terrible
start for her default-nominee standing and could invite additional dissent
in New Hampshire the following week and other contests shortly thereafter.

So far Sanders isn't attempting to reach as the broad coalition Clinton is
targeting. He doesn't highlight issues that attract attention from Hispanic
or African-American voters, but his rants against the billionaire class
with white progressives are surely doing the trick. The real question, of
course, is whether Sanders ever wants to tap into liberal hunger for
government transparency and exploit Clinton's willingness to hide and
destroy her email record of her tenure as secretary of state. So far he has
refused to attack her integrity - heaven help her if he changes his mind.

*Bernie Sanders raises $15 million. Chump change or a lot?
<http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2015/0703/Bernie-Sanders-raises-15-million.-Chump-change-or-a-lot>
// CS Monitor // Peter Grier – July 3, 2015 *

Bernie Sanders has raised $15 million since joining the presidential race
in April. Is that a lot, relatively speaking?

Yes, it’s a pretty good haul. Look at it this way: That’s fairly close to
the $18 million that moneybags Mitt Romney raised for his general account
in the first three months of his declared presidential run in the 2012
election cycle.

Plus, Senator Sanders did it the hard way, via small donors. According to
his campaign, Sanders received contributions from some 250,000 individuals.
Ninety-nine percent of the donations were for $250 or less. (By way of
contrast, the federal limit for campaign giving is $2,700 per person, per
primary or general election.)

Sanders’s new cash stash shouldn’t be too surprising: He’s a decent
fundraiser for a guy who slams Wall Street and used to call himself a
socialist. Or he’s a decent attracter of money: It’s not as if he’s holding
constant donor fundraising events, though he’s attended a few.

You can see this by looking at his electoral history. In his last two
Senate elections, 2006 and 2012, he raised more than $5 and $6 million,
respectively. That’s well over the average for other senators facing
reelection those years, according to data from the Center for Responsive
Politics.

The upshot of Sanders’s take is that it shows that his polls and his crowds
aren’t the only indicators he’s making some progress in his campaign. He’s
got enough money and enough of a donor base to maintain at least a
subsistence-level campaign for as long as he wants.

Remember, unlike Hillary Clinton, Sanders seems to be running to raise and
discuss populist issues, as opposed to being elected president. He doesn’t
need to spend money planning for extensive get-out-the-vote teams and 50
state committees. He only has to have enough cash to bounce from rally to
rally in friendly environs while generating enough free publicity via media
as he can.

“That means Clinton won’t be able to dispatch him anytime soon,” writes
Jonathan Allen at Vox.

But let’s not get carried away. Mrs. Clinton remains the heavy favorite. If
she doesn’t win the Democratic nomination, it will be one of the largest
political upsets of the modern era.

After all, Sanders is doing OK raising money, but Clinton’s doing much
better. She has taken in about $45 million since April. And that’s only for
her candidate committee: She’s got a super PAC, too, which Sanders doesn’t.
Both candidates decry the influence of these big-money committees on US
politics, but only Sanders is actually eschewing their use.

And official endorsements – an excellent predictor of eventual victory –
continue to roll in Clinton’s direction. No member of Congress has
officially backed the Vermont senator, points out Mike Lillis at The Hill.
But Hillary has many, including at least 26 of the liberal Democratic
lawmakers in the 69-member Congressional Progressive Caucus.

*Sanders says he has a ‘strong chance of winning Iowa’
<http://www.radioiowa.com/2015/07/03/sanders-says-he-has-a-strong-chance-of-winning-iowa/>
// Radio Iowa // O. Kay Henderson – July 3, 2015 *

Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders spent the first half of
this Friday campaigning in Republican-leaning northwest Iowa. A crowd of
over 200 greeted him for an early morning event in Sheldon and about 150
people crowded into the Better Day Cafe in Storm Lake to see Sanders over
the noon-hour.

“The reason that we’re going around the state and into small towns is we
understand the Caucus process and the votes here are as important as they
are in Des Moines,” Sanders told reporters after his appearance in Storm
Lake. “So we think we are putting together a strong infrastructure which is
going to give us a strong chance of winning Iowa.”

A recent Quinnipiac University Poll found Sanders’ support in Iowa has more
than doubled since May, to 33 percent of the likely Iowa Caucus-goers
surveyed. Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, a Vermont senator
and the longest-serving independent in congress, said late last year he
would not run for the Democratic Party’s 2016 presidetial nomination unless
he sensed a “grassroots revolution” — and Sanders declared as he was
leaving Storm Lake that it’s happening.

“People are resonating to the message, that there’s something fundamentally
wrong with economics and politics in America,” Sanders told reporters.

Brian Gerjets of Cherokee, a truck driver who is co-chair of Cherokee
Democratic Party, saw Sanders in Sheldon and Storm Lake. He said Sanders is
delivering a “common sense” message.

“Wake up people. Look around. Everything he’s telling you is the truth,”
Gerjets said. “The billionaires are running this world. Whether Bernie can
take it all the way to the end, that’s questionable.”

Lynn McMullen and his wife, Paula, run an antiques and woodworking store in
nearby Fonda and they’re going to vote for Sanders in the Caucuses.

“He’s right on the issues as far as getting rid of Citizens United for one
and also for single payer health care,” Paula McMullen said.

Lynn McMullen added: “It’s boiled down to wealthy elements and corporate
people just buying the government. It’s not a democracy any more and we
need to turn that around or it’s all over.”

Sanders answered questions for 15 minutes after delivering a 50-minute
speech in Storm Lake. He praised President Obama’s move this past week to
change the rules for overtime pay and repeated his call for 12-weeks of
paid family and medical leave, as well as mandatory vacation for working
Americans.

“Eighty-five percent of working men, 66 percent of working women are
working longer than 40 hours a week,” Sanders said. “At the very least, we
have got to guarantee that those workers have two weeks of paid family
vacation.”

Two other presidential candidates are campaigning in the state today.
Former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley, a Democrat, stopped at the site
of a wind turbine this morning in Ankeny to highlight his ideas for
boosting renewable energy. This afternoon, Louisiana Bobby Jindal, a
Republican, is touring a fire arms manufacturer in Sheldon then stopping in
Spencer.

*WEBB*

*Jim Webb’s Facebook engagement rivals Pataki’s
<http://www.cbsnews.com/news/jim-webbs-facebook-engagement-rivals-patakis/>
// CBS // July 3, 2015 *

Former Virginia Senator Jim Webb's quiet entry into the presidential race
was reflected by Facebook engagement numbers that were similarly subdued,
in comparison with some of his better known competitors.

It's hard to tell whether a higher-profile entrance would have made much of
a difference to his Facebook numbers, which exceeded only Former Rhode
Island Governor and Senator Lincoln Chafee's among the declared candidates
of either the Republican or Democratic parties.

In the 24-hour period between 12:01 a.m. Thursday and 12:01 a.m. Friday,
49,000 people on Facebook in the U.S. generated 81,000 interactions (likes,
posts, comments, shares) related to Webb and his announcement. The good
news for Webb is that those numbers represent a stratospheric spike from
his daily average numbers of 2,000 unique people a day.

The bad news is that everyone but Chafee attracted more interest upon entry
into the presidential race. Chafee had 20,000 unique people and 27,000
interactions. He's within shouting distance of Former New York Governor
George Pataki, who had 59,000 unique people and 81,000 interactions after
his announcement.

On the high end, Hillary Clinton dominated the 2016 field on Facebook when
she announced, with 4.7 million unique people and 10.1 million
interactions. Billionaire Donald Trump, who entered the race June 16, saw
3.4 million unique people, with 6.4 million interactions

Not surprisingly, the top states chattering about Jim Webb are the
mid-Atlantic states - his home state of Virginia, followed by the District
of Columbia, Maryland and North Carolina.

Racial issues and foreign policy were the top political topics associated
with Webb.

Webb pitched his supporters on a campaign with "a fresh approach to solving
the problems that confront us and too often unnecessarily divide us,"
according to his email. "[O]ur fellow Americans need proven, experienced
leadership that can be trusted to move us forward from a new President's
first days in office. I believe I can offer both."

*Jim Webb tests the limits of a maverick’s appeal
<http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/jim-webb-tests-the-limits-mavericks-appeal> //
MSNBC // Alex Seitz-Wald – July 3, 2015 *

Seven months after forming a presidential exploratory committee, former
Sen. Jim Webb officially jumped into the 2016 presidential race Thursday.
The surprise 2,000 word announcement email, coming as many headed out of
town for the July 4 holiday weekend, was a typically unorthodox move for
Webb.

The former senator, author, decorated Marine combat veteran and Navy
secretary is a true maverick. He’s a rebel who refuses to play by
Washington’s rules, and he has excited some liberals with his
anti-conformist ethos.

Webb’s refusal to play by the rules, and his willingness to break with
convention, is considered refreshing in an age of deep dissatisfaction with
politics. But it also means he often ends up alone, as when he defended the
Confederate flag after the shooting massacre last month at a historically
black church in Charleston, South Carolina.

By throwing out the political playbook and letting seven months pass by
without building a real campaign infrastructure, Webb went from being the
first potential candidate to declare an exploratory committee to being the
15th candidate to officially enter the race.

And his ideological heterodoxy and refusal to comport to anybody’s doctrine
makes it unclear where he stands in a Democratic field that has so far
broken down cleanly along ideological lines.

“He is not a natural ideological leader for any group in the Democratic
Party,” said Steve Jarding, a Harvard professor who co-directed Webb’s 2006
Senate campaign. “Jim’s going to have a real difficult time introducing
himself to the national Democratic electorate because of things like the
Confederate flag.”

In his long-winded announcement message, Webb made no mention of key issues
to many Democrats, like climate change, racism, women’s rights, LGBT rights
and abortion. He recently won a presidential straw poll at a conference of
conservative activists in Colorado. On Tuesday, he said he was “very proud
of having worked in the Reagan administration.”

While his party has tacked to the left, Webb has remained as heterodox as
ever. He supports the Keystone XL pipeline, has taken issue with
affirmative action, and on Tuesday, he expressed concerns with President
Obama’s executive actions on immigration.

Yet, Webb is to the left of Clinton and Obama on foreign policy, and one of
the foremost champions of criminal justice reform in either party and the
author of the post 9/11 G.I. bill. In his announcement message, Webb
focused on his opposition to the Iraq War and the 2011 intervention in
Libya – both clear shots at Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton – and a
populist economic message about reclaiming the American dream from elites.

Those messages are popular among liberals dissatisfied with Clinton, but
will they be willing to accept Webb’s less doctrinaire stances as well?

Webb’s plans often remain a mystery even to those closest to him. “Jim
always plays things close to the vest,” said David “Mudcat” Saunders, the
longtime Webb strategist who is helping out the presidential campaign on a
volunteer basis.

“The day that he said he was not going to run again in the Senate, I found
out that day. And the day he said he was going to do the exploratory
committee, I found out that day,” Saunders said last week before Webb
announced.

Webb’s staff thought the senator might announce his presidential campaign
last Friday at a speech in Iowa, and they didn’t know his plans as recently
as Tuesday.

“I wake up every morning thinking he will roll into a coffee shop and
announce something to the wait staff,” Craig Crawford, Webb’s
communications director, joked last week.

The isolation that comes with nonconformity was on display near Webb’s
hometown last Friday night, 1,000 miles away from where the former senator
was giving his speech in Iowa.

At a pep rally-like fundraiser in Webb’s backyard of northern Virginia,
state Democrats were having a party without him.

Rep. Gerry Connolly declared northern Virginia to be “Clinton territory,”
while Webb’s former Senate colleagues Mark Warner and Tim Kaine called
Clinton “our choice for the future” and “our next president,” respectively.

Webb understandably dislikes the nitty gritty of politics, but his
objections have alienated him from some Virginia Democrats, several
operatives said. “He was more interested in Myanmar than he was in
Martinsville,” said one longtime Virginia Democratic strategist, who said
officials like county party chairs gave up on asking the former senator to
do fundraisers for them.

The enthusiasm for Webb’s candidness may have reached a limit last month
when he called for “respect” for the Confederate flag as an emblem of
common soldiers who fought on both sides of the Civil War.

The reaction to Webb’s comments from Democrats in Washington and New York
was swift and brutal. “I think he went from a parody to a complete joke,”
said Ari Rabin Havt, a former staffer for Sen. Harry Reid staffer who now
hosts a progressive show on Sirrius/XM radio.

Hank Sheinkopf, a New York-based Democratic strategist, said the comments
single-handedly killed whatever slim shot Webb had at the nomination. “In
the real world, he should save his money and buy a house, because he ain’t
going anyplace in the Democratic Party,” he said.

The damage appears especially severe among black voters, a key Democratic
voting bloc with whom Webb has never been a favorite. “It makes him a
non-starter,” said Stefanie Brown James, who led outreach to black voters
for President Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign. “It’s a horrible way to
start out for him.”

Webb is a writer used to exploring nuance, but the fine shading of his
position on the Confederate flag was lost on most observers.

Several Webb allies say privately they would have preferred he stay away
from the topic of the flag entirely. But Webb is not one to shy away from
controversy if he believes in something.

The incident also underscored the racial gambit of his campaign. While
Democrats in the post-Obama era have focused on getting minorities to the
polls, Webb has said he wants to bring disaffected whites back into the
fold.

Ruy Teixeira, a Century Foundation demographer who studies the changing
makeup of the electorate, has his doubts about that tactic.

“He seems to have this idea that he represents the forgotten majority of
the Democratic Party, but it’s just not true,” said Teixeira. “The primary
electorate is pretty heavily skewed towards college educated whites and
minorities. So the idea that the would be a good candidate for that just
doesn’t make a lot of sense.”

While Webb shares a strong independent streak and an aurora of populist
authenticity with Sen. Bernie Sanders, the two presidential candidates
could not be more dislike, and not just on policy.

Sanders is the product of a movement, and he is deeply embedded in it. Webb
is lone-wolf individual, whose peripatetic career has followed his
ambitions.

Some Democrats openly scratch their heads about why Webb is even running.
“I just don’t get what he’s doing,” said Mo Elleithee, a former Clinton
aide and top official at the Democratic National Committee, who now runs
the Institute of Politics at Georgetown University.

We will likely learn much more in coming days and weeks as Webb rolls out
his presidential campaign, now that he’s officially in the race. Few voters
are paying attention at this early stage, and Webb’s position on the
Confederate flag may fade into the background.

Webb has surprised the political world before, as he likes to remind
audiences, and maybe he can do it again.

*Jim Webb Throws His Hat in the Ring for the WH
<http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/03/jim-webb-throws-his-hat-in-ring-for-wh/>
// Fox // Clint Henderson – July 3, 2015 *

Greece on the verge of defaulting and being forced from the EU currency
zone. There is a referendum on austerity scheduled for Sunday that was
demanded by the country’s left-wing Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras. It may
have been a bad move. The country appears evenly split, but the referendum
may cost Tsipras his job. EU leaders want him gone, and his popularity has
plummeted as Greek banks closed and put severe restrictions on withdrawals.
Greg Palkot reporting live from a very tense Athens.

We’re also awaiting news on what happens now in Puerto Rico as the U.S.
territory begins to run out of money. It said Monday it can’t pay off its
debts of some $72 billion.

Aetna buying Humana for some $37 billion creating the second largest
managed health care company in the United States. It’s part of the
consolidation of the health care industry as the implementation of
Obamacare makes bigger better for most providers.

President Obama spent some time yesterday bragging about the strength of
the U.S. economy. At an event in Wisconsin President Obama also attacked
Republicans saying they are good people, “It’s just their ideas are bad.”
He said the Affordable Care Act is working and is “here to stay.”

There are live events today with Senator Bernie Sanders and Hillary
Clinton. We’ll be monitoring for news.

Former Virginia Senator Jim Webb became the latest to jump into the race
for the White House. He became the fifth Democrat to announce he’s running
in a 2,000 word blog post.

We’ve also learned Republican Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is now
expected to jump into the race on July 21st.

Republicans are lining up to criticize Donald Trump who upset many with his
comments about illegal immigrants when he announced for President last
week. Jeb Bush and Chris Christie calling out Trump over the comments
(which he’s standing by).

BP agreed to a settlement over the huge Gulf of Mexico oil disaster. BP
will pay several Southern states and the Federal Government some $18
billion.

Some 5,000 people in Maryville, Tennessee remain evacuated at this hour
after a train carrying toxic gas partially derailed and exploded sending
toxic fumes into nearby areas. 10 first responders treated for fume
inhalation. 87 were seen at a local hospital. No life threatening injuries.
Kristin Fisher reporting.

A Russian supply rocket was launched to carry much-needed supplies to the
International Space Station. Three astronauts have been waiting for a
resupply mission for weeks. Two recent resupply missions failed
spectacularly recently including a Space X Falcon 9 rocket disaster.
Today’s Russian launch called flawless.

There’s a big heat wave right in the Western United States. There’s also
been some severe storms in Tennessee. We’ll keep an eye on it.

An airplane powered by solar power is scheduled to land in Hawaii today
after it’s five day journey over the Pacific Ocean.. all powered by the Sun.

We learned this week that Jet Blue has instituted baggage fees leaving only
Southwest without a fee for the first checked bag. It’s yet another sign of
how adept the airlines have become at making money from ancillary fees.
We’ll talk to prominent travel blogger from the website Pizza In Motion -
Ed Pizzarello - today about how you can outsmart the airlines and travel
for less.

*Fifth Democrats elbows way into prez race
<https://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/us_politics/2015/07/fifth_democrat_elbows_way_into_prez_race>
// Boston Herald // Bob McGovern – July 3, 2015 *

Another low-profile Democrat has emerged to challenge odds-on front-runner
Hillary Clinton, while a rising Republican star is expected to formally
join the crowd of GOP 2016 hopefuls.

Democrat Jim Webb, a former U.S. senator from Virginia, announced yesterday
that he will take on Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a nationally popular Republican for standing
up to unions, will officially enter the race with a campaign announcement
on July 13, according to his aides.

Webb, in a statement posted on his campaign website, acknowledged that he
is a long shot to win the party’s nomination, which many believe will go to
Clinton.

“I understand the odds, particularly in today’s political climate, where
fair debate is so often drowned out by huge sums of money,” Webb wrote. “I
know that more than one candidate in this process intends to raise at least
a billion dollars.”

Webb, 69, was a Navy secretary under President Ronald Reagan who became a
Democrat in response to the Iraq War that he opposed.

Webb has said he needs to raise enough money to mount a “viable” campaign,
which could be critical to competing with Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley and former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln
Chafee are also vying for the Democratic nod.

Walker, meanwhile, will join a Republican ticket that has already attracted
14 candidates, including New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who joined the
fray earlier in the week.

Walker’s stature grew when he emerged as a powerful anti-

union candidate. In 2011 he pushed a law that effectively ended collective
bargaining for most public workers in Wisconsin. Four years later, he
pressed to make Wisconsin a right-to-work state where employers and unions
are barred from requiring all workers to pay union dues.

Along the way, he shattered state campaign finance records, collecting
six-figure checks from prominent conservatives across the country.

Walker is trying to become the first president since Harry Truman, elected
nearly 70 years ago, without a college degree. Walker attended Marquette
University for three years, but dropped out in 1990 to take a job with the
American Red Cross. Walker ran for the state Assembly that year and lost.
He moved to a more conservative district outside of Milwaukee and ran again
in 1993, winning that time. He hasn’t lost since.

*CHAFEE*

*Democrats in New Hampshire find some of Chafee’s ideas ‘odd’
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/f8c1ca6d355e4561b0c053c63d106713/democrats-new-hampshire-find-some-chafees-ideas-odd>
// AP // Michelle R. Smith – July 3, 2015 *

Presidential candidate Lincoln Chafee stands before a few dozen people at a
meeting of New Hampshire's Belknap County Democrats. The
Republican-turned-independent-turned-Democrat gets nods of approval when he
tells them he was the only Republican senator to vote against authorizing
the war in Iraq.

Then smiles turn to laughter when he pitches another idea: The U.S. should
switch to the metric system.

The former Rhode Island governor has visited the first primary state of New
Hampshire a dozen times this year. But he seems to be making barely a
ripple — aside from curiosity about some of his policy platforms.

In Belknap County, at least some Democrats seemed intrigued by Chafee as
someone who could represent an alternative to Hillary Rodham Clinton, the
commanding favorite for the nomination. But they are also puzzled by what
he talks about sometimes.

Chafee told the group he wants to bring National Security Agency leaker
Edward Snowden home, dropping all charges against him. Paula Trombi of
Meredith said she liked some of what he said but was taken aback and
disappointed by his position on Snowden. She also can't understand why he
keeps talking about the metric system, of all things.

"With all the troubles that are going on, that seems almost odd to bring
up," she said.

Dave Kerr, a selectman in Barnstead, said he agreed with Chafee that
billions have been spent on the war that could have been better spent on
roads and schools. But Kerr was leaving with a poster and a donation
envelope for another Democratic rival, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who
also opposed the Iraq war. A Sanders supporter had handed them out, and
Kerr wondered why Chafee hadn't, also.

Chafee is known to dislike fundraising and is just starting to raise money
for a race where spending is expected to be measured in the billions. His
past campaigns — two Senate races as a Republican and a governor's race as
an independent — have relied on an old New England family fortune amassed
over generations.

Dave Pollak, chairman of Belknap County Democrats, said he agreed with
Chafee that Snowden is a whistleblower and should not be prosecuted. With
Chafee's background in different parties, Pollak sees him as someone who
could bridge the ideological divide between Democrats and Republicans. He
even likes the metric system idea.

But Pollak finds other aspects of Chafee's campaign peculiar.

Clinton's campaign is in contact with the group every week inviting its
members to events, has multiple campaign offices open and created specialty
groups for supporters such as "High Schoolers for Hillary." The Sanders
campaign sends regular "rousing" emails on issues, Pollak said. The
campaign for another rival, former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, also has
staff in the state.

Chafee, on the other hand, has no campaign staff in New Hampshire yet and
appears to be running on a shoestring. Although Chafee has a vacation home
further north in Franconia, he said he hasn't been staying there during the
campaign. Instead, he drives to his New Hampshire events from Rhode Island,
a five-hour round trip this evening. He was back in Somersworth, New
Hampshire, the following day.

It makes Pollak wonder how serious he is.

"What's the organization?" he asks. "What gives you confidence that he can
get the voters out?"

Chafee gets testy when asked about matters like that. He says it's an
"evolutionary process."

"You guys never ask anything about the substance," he told a reporter.
"It's always about how many people, how much money have you raised. Ugh.

"I wish there was more intellectual discussion about the issues in these
campaigns."

As he spoke, Chafee aide Jonathan Stevens handed out stickers saying "Trust
Chafee." The design and motto are identical to the one from his 2010
campaign for governor. Asked if they're 2010 leftovers, Stevens replied,
"We recycle everything."

Stickers bearing this year's motto, "Fresh Ideas for America," were nowhere
in sight.

*UNDECLARED*

*BIDEN*

*Will Joe Biden run for president? Drumbeat picks up.
<http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2015/0703/Will-Joe-Biden-run-for-president-Drumbeat-picks-up>
// CS Monitor // Linda Feldmann – July 3, 2015 *

Vice President Joe Biden has long harbored dreams of being president. He’s
run twice before, clearly relishes political life, and has yet to rule out
a third try – even as Hillary Clinton dominates in fundraising and in polls
of Democrats.

After the death on May 30 of Mr. Biden’s beloved elder son, Beau, such talk
was put on hold. But in recent days, speculation has begun to soar. New
York businessman Jon Cooper, a former Obama fundraising bundler now working
on a draft effort to get Biden into the race, told the Monitor Thursday
that he puts the probability of Biden running at 80 percent.

“I’m as convinced as I can be that Joe Biden will be entering the
presidential race,” said Mr. Cooper, who bases his assessment on signals
from Biden’s inner circle, though he can't name names.

Cooper has been sounding out potential donors, and already has commitments
from five Obama contributors. On Thursday, Cooper signed on as national
finance chair for an independent effort called Draft Biden 2016. Launched
in March, the Chicago-based group has collected more than 100,000
signatures, and now has staff on the ground in early nominating states –
Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina. The group has also hired a
national fundraising firm.

Biden could also find encouragement in a new CNN/ORC national poll released
Wednesday. Without lifting a finger, he is running second in the Democratic
field, at 16 percent. Though Biden is well behind former Secretary Clinton
(57 percent), he’s in a statistical tie with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) of
Vermont (14 percent), who has been campaigning hard and drawing crowds
numbering in the thousands. Perhaps more important, Biden is national
Democrats' second-choice candidate, with 35 percent saying he's their
second choice and 14 percent choosing Sanders. If Clinton were to falter
seriously, Democrats' second-choice candidate could be the biggest
beneficiary.

Earlier this week, a report in The Wall Street Journal quoted Biden friends
by name saying that before his death, Beau Biden had encouraged his dad to
run, as has Biden’s other son, Hunter.

Biden will reportedly state his intentions, either way, by early August.
When reached by telephone, former Sen. Ted Kaufman (D) of Delaware, a close
friend of Biden’s, declined to comment on the vice president’s thinking.
Biden's office also won't comment.

Perhaps the biggest clue that Biden might run is that he and his inner
circle have done nothing to stop the draft effort, say draft organizers.

“We have had no communications from anyone in the Biden camp saying, ‘Stop
what you’re doing,’ ” William Pierce, executive director of Draft Biden
2016, said in an interview. “Delaware’s a small state, and we talk to the
same people, and all we’ve heard is a lot of encouraging communication from
people who are close to the vice president.”

Pierce’s group has been holding events in Iowa and other states, and brings
a life-size cutout of Biden, called “Cardboard Joe,” to liven things up. At
the group’s website, DraftBiden2016.com, merchandise is for sale with the
logo “I’m ridin' with Biden,” featuring the veep driving a convertible and
wearing his signature aviator sunglasses.

Pundits are skeptical Biden will run and suggest that the media are
inflating the possibility to add interest to the Democratic race. If Biden
were to run, they doubt he could beat Clinton for the nomination. On
Wednesday, Clinton announced a fundraising haul of $45 million for the
first three months of her candidacy, a record for a presidential
candidate’s first-quarter fundraising.

“It would be a hard catch-up for Biden. He doesn’t have the infrastructure.
Who does he go to?” says veteran Democratic strategist Peter Fenn. “I’m not
saying it’s impossible, I’m just saying it’s hard.”

Still, Mr. Fenn gets why Biden has kept his options open. Since Harry
Truman assumed the presidency after the death of Franklin Roosevelt in
1945, most vice presidents have run for the top job, and a few have reached
it. Biden, a senator for 36 years before attaining the vice presidency, has
long had that presidential gleam in his eye. He first ran in 1988, then
again in 2008.

“I can die a happy man never having been president of the United States of
America,” Biden told GQ magazine in July 2013. “But it doesn’t mean I won’t
run.”

“Joe’s a thoroughbred,” says Fenn. “He loves this. He sees the gate filling
up with other horses, and it’s hard for him not to head for it.”

What about the age issue? Already in his early 70s, Biden would be the
oldest person to assume the presidency. But he’s not that much older than
Clinton, and he's younger than Senator Sanders. Biden supporters say what
matters isn’t age, it’s energy and enthusiasm.

And Biden is nothing if not enthusiastic – sometimes to his embarrassment.
Who can forget his hot-mike comment in 2010 as Mr. Obama was about to sign
the Affordable Care Act: “This is a big [expletive] deal.” At a campaign
appearance in southern Virginia in 2012, Biden again raised eyebrows when
he told a predominantly black audience that Republicans are “going to put
y'all back in chains."

Biden gaffes are many, but they’re part of what gives him authenticity in a
world of overly scripted candidates, analysts say. His life experiences,
including a political career bookended by personal tragedy, give him plenty
to go on in connecting with voters. Unlike Clinton, Biden is not wealthy,
and he doesn’t face the challenge on trustworthiness that she does, amid
questions over her private e-mails and Clinton Foundation fundraising.

But by getting into the race relatively late, isn’t there a big chance that
Biden would end up only damaging Clinton, the eventual nominee? Fenn, the
Democratic strategist, doesn’t see it that way.

“Democrats don’t like coronations,” he says. “They don’t like this notion
that someone should be given the nomination without having to work hard and
go through their paces. So my sense of this is that at the end, it would be
good for Hillary to go through this.”

*Will Joe Biden Run For President in 2016 After All? One Prominent
Fundraiser Thinks So
<http://www.bustle.com/articles/94835-will-joe-biden-run-for-president-in-2016-after-all-one-prominent-fundraiser-thinks-so>
// Bustle // Chris Tognotti – July 3, 2015 *

On Thursday, with the announcement that former Viriginia Senator Jim Webb
was jumping into the race, the Democratic presidential field hit five
candidates total — if you’re counting former Rhode Island Governor Lincoln
Chafee, that is, the longest of long-shots. It’s a thin field compared to
the Republican side, and with only one household name — it’s beginning to
look like a showdown between Hillary Clinton and liberal upstart Bernie
Sanders. But what if another high-profile Democrat was waiting in the
wings? Will Joe Biden actually run for president in 2016 after all?

Throughout last year, Biden’s name was one of many prospective
possibilities for the Democrats, and that makes natural sense. As an
incumbent two-term vice president, and one with longstanding ambitions for
the top job — he’s run twice before, in 1988 and 2008 — you’d expect him to
be interested. But the election news cycle had sort of passed him by in
recent months, due to the perceived invincibility of Clinton’s primary
campaign, his uninspiring poll numbers, and the tragic illness and death of
his son Beau.

But now, the rumors appear to be heating up again — according to a report
from The Christian Science Monitor, a major Democratic fundraiser believes
there’s an 80 percent likelihood that good ol’ Uncle Joe will be jumping in
for his last, best chance to win the presidency.

Here’s what Jon Cooper, a businessman and former Obama fundraiser, told the
Monitor about the effort. On Thursday, it was announced that he’d signed on
as national finance chairman for the Draft Biden 2016 Super PAC.

I’m as convinced as I can be that Joe Biden will be entering the
presidential race.

In recent history, sitting vice presidents have made potent presidential
candidates. Over the past 30 years, two out of three two-term VPs have
taken the plunge — George H.W. Bush mounted a successful run after eight
years as Ronald Reagan’s VP, and Al Gore came within a hair’s breadth of
winning after eight years as Bill Clinton’s number two. Dick Cheney never
ran, likey owing to his notoriously poor health — he actually signed a
letter of resignation and sealed it in his office, in case he suffered a
heart-related incident that left him in an unresponsive state.

In Biden’s case, he faces a pretty abnormal set of circumstances. He’d
undoubtedly be trailing Clinton by a huge margin from the get-go, but his
current place in the polls should still give him some cause for optimism.

A recent CNN/ORC poll had him at second place nationally, at 16 percent,
just outpacing Sanders at 14 percent. This is noteworthy, because Biden
hasn’t been campaigning, or even dropping public hints that he might run
yet, compared to Sanders who’s been campaigning for months. In other words,
he’s showing a higher floor to start from than Sanders has, and you never
know — given a few months of hard campaigning himself, who’s to say he
couldn’t strike a little fear in the Clinton camp?

If anything seems obvious, however, it’s that he doesn’t have much longer
to wait. Besides him, there really aren’t any other Democrats expected to
run in 2016 — the movement to draft Massachusetts senator and progressive
icon Elizabeth Warren, for all its enthusiasm, didn’t end up going
anywhere. And with Sanders drawing surprisingly big crowds and gaining
momentum, Biden would be wise to make a move soon if he’s going to —
according to The Wall Street Journal, he’s expected to make a decision by
August.

*OTHER*

*GOP*

*DECLARED*

*BUSH*

*Jeb Bush Needs Some New Economic Advice
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/04/opinion/jeb-bush-needs-some-new-economic-advice.html?_r=0>
// NYT // Editorial Board – July 3, 2015 *

Jeb Bush is said to have brought on Glenn Hubbard as an economic adviser —
the dean of the Columbia University Graduate School of Business and a
prominent conservative who served as President George W. Bush’s chief
economist and was an architect of the big tax cuts in 2001, which favored
the wealthy. He can be expected to weigh in on wage stagnation and income
inequality, campaign issues that all the candidates, including Mr. Bush,
have said they will address.

If the former Florida governor heeds Mr. Hubbard’s advice, he’s not likely
to get the issue right. Answering a question from two Times reporters about
the long stagnation in middle-class incomes, Mr. Hubbard argued that
“compensation didn’t stagnate.” He said that wages have been stuck because
of global competition but that employer-provided benefits for health and
retirement have increased.

Politically, the comment is notable because it seemed to minimize a problem
that Mr. Bush has already said is significant. It is also off point. For
the broad middle class, more than three-fourths of family income is from
wages and salaries, which have stagnated since the late 1970s, with the
exception of one growth period in the latter half of the 1990s. Since then,
wages have been flat or falling for most of the work force, including
college graduates, a consequence of the underlying weakness in the bubble
economy of the George W. Bush years and ensuing income losses from the
financial crisis and its aftermath.

Factoring in benefits doesn’t alter the basic picture. In recent decades,
wages have sometimes grown faster than benefits, sometimes more slowly. So
the argument that compensation has not stagnated may appear more plausible
in some periods than in others. But that does not change the overall trend
of prolonged stagnation and widening inequality.

Similarly, benefits are a more robust part of the compensation picture when
private-sector employees are lumped together with government employees. In
general, health and retirement benefits in the private sector have become
less generous in recent decades, while public-sector employees have had
relatively more success in holding on to valuable benefits. For
private-sector employees, the share of compensation represented by benefits
has largely been flat since the government began to separately track
private-sector data in 1987.

Finally, the data surely overstate the value of benefits for typical
workers. That’s because they are averages, and in a time of rising wage
inequality, the average is pulled up by the gains of highly paid employees
and executives.

Mr. Hubbard’s comment echoes a similar argument made in 2005, when the
labor secretary at the time, Elaine Chao, dismissed concerns about poor
wage growth during the Bush years by pointing out that overall
compensation, including for health care, was on the rise. That seemed to
explain the problem away, but as a practical matter, it meant that money
that otherwise could have gone toward raises went to cover what were then
the exploding costs of health coverage.

Like Ms. Chao’s focus on compensation, Mr. Hubbard’s similar focus today is
off the mark. Mr. Bush, and the public, should not expect fresh
perspectives from advisers who were in positions of power when wage
stagnation became entrenched.

*Jeb Bush to meet with Mitt Romney in Kennebunkport
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/03/jeb-bush-to-meet-with-mitt-romney-in-kennebunkport/>
// WaPo // Philip Rucker – July 3, 2015 *

Chris Christie and Marco Rubio are not the only presidential candidates
catching up with Mitt Romney in New England.

Romney and his wife, Ann, plan to meet this coming week with former Florida
governor Jeb Bush for lunch at Walker's Point, the Bush family compound in
Kennebunkport, Maine, according to aides familiar with the plans.

"Governor and Mrs. Romney look forward to visiting with Governor Jeb Bush
and his family at Walker's Point this coming week," said the Romney aide,
who spoke only on the condition of anonymity. An aide to Bush confirmed the
plans.

In past years, the Romneys have visited with the Bushes at Walker's Point.
The Romneys spend much of the summer at their own family compound on Lake
Winnipesaukee in Wolfeboro, N.H., which is about a 50-mile drive from
Kennebunkport.

This will be a busy week at Walker's Point. Bush is hosting a retreat there
for top campaign donors on Thursday and Friday. Bush, who is expected to
spend much of the week with family in Maine, also plans to drop into New
Hampshire for some campaigning. He will march in two Fourth of July parades
on Saturday.

*Jeb Bush raises questions about Obama’s Iran negotiations
<http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2015/07/02/jeb-bush-raises-questions-about-obamas-iran-negotiations/>
// Reuters // Steve Holland – July 2, 2015 *

Jeb Bush is skeptical about U.S.-led negotiations with Iran over its
nuclear program.

In a column written for Townhall.com, the 2016 Republican presidential
candidate says a flawed Iran deal could be “the legacy of the
Obama-Clinton-Kerry foreign policy,” and if so, “it will be a dangerous one
for the next president to repair.”

“As we await details of the latest concessions the Obama Administration is
making to Iran, we should recall the grave danger posed to the world by
Iran’s non-nuclear aggression across the Middle East. Without a
comprehensive strategy to deal with the totality of Iran’s threats to our
interests, the expected nuclear deal is likely to offer only short-term
political benefits for President Obama, not lasting security benefits for
America,” Bush writes.

*Don’t Trust Iran
<http://townhall.com/columnists/jebbush/2015/07/02/dont-trust-iran-n2020576>
// Town Hall // Jeb Bush – July 2, 2015 *

Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons poses a grave threat to the United
States, to Israel, to other close partners in the Middle East, and to
international peace and security. There is not yet a nuclear deal with
Iran, but I agree with the many experts who believe an agreement is likely.
Repeated concessions and desperate accommodation suggest the Obama
Administration will do anything to secure a deal. And with America playing
such a weak hand, why shouldn’t the Supreme Leader squeeze President Obama
for more concessions?

Although I will reserve final judgment until the details of a comprehensive
agreement are public, I fear it will be a bad deal for the United States,
Israel, and all who desire a stable Middle East. And it will be a good deal
for Iran’s leaders: one that legitimizes Iran’s authoritarian regime, fills
Tehran’s dwindling coffers, and fuels Iran’s aggression throughout the
region – all without requiring the clerics to give up their nuclear weapons
ambitions. Indeed, a bipartisan group that included several former senior
Obama Administration officials recently acknowledged the deal being
negotiated “will not prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapons capability.”

As we await details of the latest concessions the Obama Administration is
making to Iran, we should recall the grave danger posed to the world by
Iran’s non-nuclear aggression across the Middle East. Without a
comprehensive strategy to deal with the totality of Iran’s threats to our
interests, the expected nuclear deal is likely to offer only short-term
political benefits for President Obama, not lasting security benefits for
America.

Iran is the world’s most active state sponsor of terrorism. It has
supported a wide variety of terrorist organizations, from Shi’a extremists
in Lebanese Hizballah and Iraq’s militias to Sunni jihadists in groups such
as Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the Taliban, and even al Qaeda. Prior
to September 11, 2001, Iranian-backed Hizballah was responsible for the
deaths of more Americans than any other terrorist organization in the
world, and it remains an extraordinarily deadly terrorist group that
threatens U.S. interests. During the war in Iraq, Iranian proxies and
weapons were responsible for the deaths of more than a thousand American
soldiers. Despite the wishful thinking of the Obama Administration
surrounding the 2013 selection Hassan Rouhani as Iran’s President, Iran’s
support for terrorism has only continued, and its proxies are as violent as
ever.

Iran foments instability and sectarian tension throughout the region. It is
a delusion to believe, as the President does, that the current regime in
Tehran can be a force for stability in the Middle East. Iran has bankrolled
and armed the Assad regime during its war against the Syrian people, and
hundreds of Iranian special operations forces are operating as combatants
in Syria. Iranian-backed militia have subverted the Iraqi state and helped
fuel sectarian tensions that have driven many Sunnis into the arms of ISIL.

And in Yemen, Iran has supported Houthi rebels who deposed one of America’s
most important counterterrorism partners and plunged the country into chaos.

Iran has one of the most aggressive rocket and missile programs in the
world. Iranian-backed militias used Iranian mortars, rockets, and
improvised explosive devices to attack U.S. targets. Hamas and Hizballah
have fired thousands of Iranian-produced rockets, projectiles, and missiles
against Israel. The Islamic Republic of Iran has developed long-range
missiles capable of hitting Israel, and is developing an Intercontinental
Ballistic Missile that would be capable of hitting the United States.

Not content with aggression abroad, Iran’s rulers engage in brutal
repression at home. Religious minorities, political dissidents, and
journalists are subjected to harassment, detention, torture, and even
execution. Despite Obama Administration hopes that President Rouhani would
usher in an era of moderation and tolerance, his tenure has been marked by
an increase in human rights abuses and repression. The leaders of the 2009
Green Movement remain in detention, as do at least several American
citizens and countless Iranian political dissidents and prisoners of
conscience.

The Obama-Clinton-Kerry Iran policy has failed not only because its weak
negotiating strategy will not stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapons
capability, but also because it has, from the beginning, ignored the
comprehensive nature of the threat posed by Iran. The nuclear program is
but one symptom of an underlying disease, and the Obama Administration has
treated only this one symptom, and ineffectively at that.

Whatever happens in the coming days, America under our next President will
have to deal comprehensively with the threats posed by Iran. It must seek
to rally the region and the world to pressure Iran to change its behavior.
It must demand conclusive proof Iran has not just delayed, but given up its
nuclear weapons ambitions. It must develop a strategy not just to defeat
ISIL, but also to combat Iran’s malign activities in Iraq and Syria. It
must impose meaningful consequences on Iran for its support of terrorism
and its abhorrent treatment of its own citizens. It must deny Iran the
ability to produce longer-range ballistic missiles that will threaten
America and its allies.

Undoing the damage done by a fundamentally flawed nuclear deal will not be
easy. But it will be essential for the security of the United States.

All of these challenges will, of course, be exponentially more difficult to
address if, by consummating a bad nuclear deal with Iran, the Obama
Administration squanders the international consensus and sanctions
currently pressuring Iran’s leaders without securing a more fundamental
shift in Iran’s behavior.

If this is the legacy of the Obama-Clinton-Kerry foreign policy, it will be
a dangerous one for the next President to repair.

*RUBIO*

*Marco Rubio’s Donor Obstacles: A Limited Base and Another Floridian
<http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/07/04/us/politics/marco-rubios-donor-obstacles-no-base-and-another-floridian-is-running.html>
// NYT // Jeremy W. Peters and Ashley Parker – July 3, 2015 *

In the nearly three months since he announced that he was running for
president, Senator Marco Rubio has been enjoying his moment. Republicans
have talked up his potential. Democrats have called him a threat. He has
been in the top tier of many polls.

But one of the biggest measures of his success — whether he impresses
Republican donors as much as he does the party’s leading operatives and
opinion shapers — has been harder to discern.

Mr. Rubio has a notable disadvantage in the congested, fragmented field of
Republican candidates: He has no natural national base of support to draw
on, the way Senator Ted Cruz does with evangelical Christians or Senator
Rand Paul does with libertarians.

And Mr. Rubio has been cut off from some of the financial support he
received in his home state, Florida, when it elected him to the Senate in
2010: Many of the wealthy donors who propelled him to national political
fame are sticking by Jeb Bush, the former governor.

Bent on mitigating those deficits, Mr. Rubio has been on a cross-country
fund-raising binge, spending little time meeting voters and far more at
dinners and receptions in the homes of an eclectic set of patrons — from
Larry Ellison, the software developer who hosted a few dozen barefoot Rubio
supporters at his Japanese-inspired compound outside San Francisco, to Rick
Harrison, a Las Vegas pawnshop owner best known for his role on the History
Channel’s “Pawn Stars.”

In his private appeals for money, Mr. Rubio avoids overtly drawing
comparisons to Mr. Bush. But those who have heard him say that the implied
contrast could not be more obvious: He embodies the future of the
Republican Party, while Mr. Bush represents the past.

“The differences are clear and don’t even really need to be mentioned,”
said George Seay, a Dallas investor who has hosted two fund-raisers for Mr.
Rubio this year.

Some differences, however, need to be stated.

In Las Vegas a few weeks ago, Mr. Rubio got across a simple message,
recalled Mr. Harrison: “The other guys have a lot more money than me.”

The first glimpse of how much all this fund-raising has paid off — and the
clearest sign yet of how viable a force Mr. Rubio will be against
well-financed primary opponents — will come over the next week or so when
the candidates and their “super PACs” begin reporting how much money they
raised in the second quarter, which ended Tuesday.

Mr. Rubio’s supporters say they believe a credible sum to have in his
campaign bank account when candidates report their totals would be in the
neighborhood of $10 million. His super PAC, they said, should have roughly
twice that.

But not all has been going as smoothly as hoped. The campaign canceled two
fund-raisers last month in Florida because not enough donors had committed.
A top Washington-based fund-raiser for Mr. Rubio, Carmen Miller Spence,
just resigned her position with the campaign. A Rubio spokesman declined to
comment on Ms. Spence’s exit but said the canceled events would be
rescheduled.

“All my friends — all my friends — it seems everybody over 70 is for Jeb
Bush,” said Gay Gaines, a Rubio supporter who has held fund-raisers for him
at her Palm Beach home. “It’s not that I don’t think Jeb is fabulous — I
do. But I said to all of them: ‘You know what worries me? The millennials.
They’re not going to want another Bush.’”

“It kills me,” she added.

Mr. Rubio has some very generous benefactors: Norman Braman, a billionaire
auto dealer, is expected to give him $10 million, though the senator’s
supporters say they do not know when that money is coming, or whether all
of it will materialize.

And if Mr. Rubio finds himself largely shut out of the Bush network, he has
made inroads with another powerhouse fund-raising machine: Mitt Romney’s
operation, which raised $1 billion in the 2012 presidential campaign. Many
of Mr. Romney’s former advisers and donors feel loyalty to Mr. Rubio, who
threw himself into Mr. Romney’s campaign.

“He, from the get-go, was very willing to do whatever we asked him to do,
no ego, was able to excite crowds and create crowds,” said Tagg Romney, Mr.
Romney’s oldest son. “You learn a lot about a person and what they’re
willing to do and how they handle themselves. And he was great.”

Mr. Rubio’s campaign manager, deputy campaign manager and New Hampshire
strategist worked on one or both of Mr. Romney’s presidential runs. The
Rubio campaign’s ad agency, Poolhouse, was founded by two Romney campaign
veterans. Another former Romney aide, Garrett Jackson, recently hosted a
fund-raiser for Mr. Rubio in Texas.

And last month, at a retreat for Republican donors that Mr. Romney arranged
in Utah, he praised Mr. Rubio’s turn at the microphone. “There was a point
in his remarks where I felt something in my heart and I said, ‘Yeah, that’s
the America I know and love,’” said Mr. Romney, who is hosting Mr. Rubio
and the senator’s young family this weekend at the Romney summer home in
Wolfeboro, N.H.

But other presidential candidates attended the event, and Mr. Romney’s
praise stopped well short of an endorsement.

Mr. Rubio has also worked to cultivate ties with several billionaires who
are expected to pour huge sums into the 2016 campaign: He headlined a forum
for Americans for Prosperity, the group backed by the industrialists
Charles G. and David H. Koch, in New Hampshire last week. And he just
signed on to an effort in Congress to limit online gambling, a priority of
the Las Vegas casino magnate Sheldon Adelson.

The focus on money has been relentless, not only in drumming it up but also
in holding onto it with a tight fist. Mr. Rubio’s campaign is run out of an
old townhouse on Capitol Hill, and his campaign manager, Terry Sullivan,
proudly posted on Twitter a picture of the Southwest jet he and Mr. Rubio
were about to board in Las Vegas.

*Sen. Marco Rubio To Campaign In Nevada
<http://miami.cbslocal.com/2015/07/03/sen-marco-rubio-to-campaign-in-nevada/>
// CBS // July 3, 2015 *

Republican Presidential candidate and Florida Senator Marco Rubio is going
back to Nevada.

The Florida senator will visit Las Vegas on July 11th and make stops at a
Henderson retirement community and Lt. Governor Mark Hutchinson’s house for
a private event with state legislators and activists.

Rubio is scheduled to give a speech at a recreational center in Sun City
Anthem, a popular retirement community in Henderson. He’ll then attend a
private event with supporters at the Las Vegas home of Hutchison, who is
Rubio’s statewide campaign director.

The trip marks the second Nevada visit for Rubio since the Florida
Republican announced his presidential candidacy in April. He made campaign
stops in Las Vegas and Reno in May.

*Marco Rubio on Trump: ‘Offensive’ and ‘Divisive’ Comments Are Not Offering
A Solution
<http://www.mediaite.com/online/marco-rubio-on-trump-offensive-and-divisive-comments-are-not-offering-a-solution/>
// Mediaite // Ken Meyer – July 3, 2015 *

Marco Rubio has become the latest 2016 Republican hopeful to denounce
Donald Trump‘s controversial statements about Mexican immigrant criminals
and rapists.

Rubio put out a statement blasing the comments for not just being
inaccurate and “offensive”, but also dangerous for being “divisive.”

“Our next president needs to be someone who brings Americans together – not
someone who continues to divide,” Rubio wrote. “Our broken immigration
system is something that needs to be solved, and comments like this move us
further from – not closer to – a solution.”

Rubio’s statement comes two days after his 2016 rival George Pataki urged
his fellow candidates to come out against Trump’s incendiary remarks,
describing them as “sad and divisive” and fearful that they would hurt the
Republican party. Rick Perry also disapproved of Trump’s statements, saying
it was a “huge error” to make such a sweeping, derogatory generalization.

You can read Rubio’s full statement here:

Trump’s comments are not just offensive and inaccurate, but also divisive.
Our next president needs to be someone who brings Americans together – not
someone who continues to divide. Our broken immigration system is something
that needs to be solved, and comments like this move us further from – not
closer to – a solution. We need leaders who offer serious solutions to
secure our border and fix our broken immigration system.

*PAUL*

*Ron Paul says Trump troubles him
<http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/246848-ron-paul-says-trump-troubles-him>
// The Hill // Mark Hensch – July 3, 2015 *

Former Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) said on Thursday that GOP presidential
candidate Donald Trump’s ‘aggressive personality’ troubles him.

Paul said the billionaire’s top-down management style might not translate
to the White House in an interview.

“I don’t think anybody should be running the economy and that’s the whole
fallacy of our last hundred years,” Paul told host Ed Berliner of Newsmax
TV’s “The Hard Line.”

“[Trump] can’t run the economy, he can’t create jobs and he should know
that,” Paul said.

“He can create jobs if he stays in the building industry, but even his
industry is going to be in trouble because he might build too many
buildings because interest rates are zero,” he added.

“He taps in to a lot of people, but the thing that concerns me is that it’s
sort of like take charge and take over and we’ve had too much government
taking charge and taking over.

“It’s the government that created it and we don’t need somebody with an
iron fist to come in and say, ‘It’ll be done my way and I can correct all
these problems,’ because the solution isn’t to have somebody strong to tell
us what to do,” he said.

Paul also praised last week’s Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex
marriage nationwide.

It ruled in a landmark 5-4 decision on June 26 that states must recognize
the practice under the 14th Amendment’s equal protections clause.

“[It’s] their business,” Paul said of same-sex marriages.

“That’s the wonderful thing about libertarianism,” he added. “It doesn’t
have to make that final decision of what people should do.”

Paul’s son, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), is also seeking the Republican
nomination next election cycle.

He called on the government to remove itself from regulating marriage
entirely on Monday.

*CRUZ*

*Ted Cruz continues to defend Donald Trump on immigration
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/03/ted-cruz-continues-to-defend-donald-trump-on-immigration/>
// WaPo // Katie Zezima – July 3, 2015 *

Sen. Ted Cruz continues to defend Donald Trump on immigration.

Cruz (R-Tex.), in an interview with NBC's "Meet the Press" praised Trump
for talking about immigration. Trump has made inflammatory comments about
Mexican immigrants, leading Macy's and Univision to sever ties with Trump.

Cruz, speaking during his book tour in Marietta, Ga., said he likes Trump,
who Cruz said is "bold" and "brash." Cruz said he's not going to attack
Trump.

"I salute Donald Trump for focusing on the need to address illegal
immigration," Cruz said, reiterating that he believes that "amnesty is
wrong."

Cruz said Trump has a "colorful way of speaking -- it's not the way I
speak. But I'm not going to engage in the media's game of throwing rocks
and attacking other Republicans. I'm just not gonna do it."

Cruz previously said that Trump was "terrific" and shouldn't apologize
because he "speaks the truth."

A number of GOP candidates condemned Trump's comments.

"They're bringing drugs," Trump said in his presidential announcement
speech. "They're bringing crime. They're rapists."

Trump also said he wants to build a "great wall on our southern border" to
keep illegal immigrants from Mexico out of the United States.

*Ted Cruz defends Donald Trump, slams ‘Washington cartel’ on immigration
<http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/ted-cruz-defends-donald-trump-slams-washington-on-immigration-119726.html>
// Politico // Ali Breland – July 3, 2015 *

Sen. Ted Cruz defended Donald Trump on immigration and called out “the
Washington cartel” he says is ignoring the issue, in an interview to be
broadcast Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“I salute Donald Trump for focusing on the need to address illegal
immigration,” Cruz said of his rival for the 2016 GOP nomination, adding
that it “seems the favorite sport of the Washington media is to encourage
some Republicans to attack other Republicans.”

“I’m not interested in Republican on Republican violence,” he told host
Chuck Todd, adding that “bold … brash” Trump “has a colorful way of
speaking.”

The Texas senator’s comments were similar to his defense of Trump during
Fox & Friends on Tuesday.

“When it comes to Donald Trump, I like Donald Trump,” Cruz said on the
show. “I think he’s terrific.”

Trump sparked a backlash with inflammatory comments about Mexican
immigrants during his campaign kick-off speech, leading to NBC and
Univision severing ties with the billionaire real-estate mogul, and Macy’s
dropping his clothing line.

Marco Rubio, the Florida senator who is also vying for the Republican
nomination, took a more critical approach on Trump’s statements.

“Trump’s comments are not just offensive and inaccurate, but also
divisive,” Rubio said in a statement released Friday.

*A Conservative Firebrand From The Start, Ted Cruz Always Had A Plan
<http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/07/03/419256802/a-conservative-firebrand-from-the-start-ted-cruz-always-had-a-plan>
// NPR // Ailsa Change – July 3, 2015 *

Boldness comes more naturally to Ted Cruz than compromise. Barely through
his first year in the Senate, the Texas Republican bucked his party leaders
and became the public face of a government shutdown while standing up for
conservative ideals. Rewind three decades back, and you'd find Cruz selling
a similar message as a teenager in Houston.

You could say Cruz ran with a gang in high school. Their colors were blue
jacket, white shirt, red tie. They called themselves the Constitutional
Corroborators. And their leader was the head of a conservative think tank
named Rolland Storey, who took them around Houston to perform.

"He would introduce them and say, 'They're now going to write down
memorized sections of the Constitution. Word for word,' " said Winston
Elliott, who helped coach the young recruits.

The Constitutional Corroborators would roll into Rotary Clubs and other
civic groups — and they'd be armed with easels.

"On cue, they would stand at the easel, and each write out on the easel a
major section. And then, when they finished, [Storey] would say, 'Now each
of you explain that section of the Constitution,' " Elliott said.

This is how Ted Cruz the teenager spent much of his spare time — hanging
out two nights a week with a think tank in Houston called the Free
Enterprise Institute.

Storey would lead the students in discussions about the Constitution, the
Federalist papers and Anti-Federalist papers. They'd compete in speech
contests about the free market.

Elliott, who now heads the Free Enterprise Institute, first met Cruz when
he judged the skinny high school freshman in one of those speech contests.

"Suddenly Ted just turned it on," Elliott remembered. "And you just got
this confidence and this clarity. Explain economic principles — basic
economic principles — of inflation and property rights and this kind of
thing when you're in ninth grade? I mean, I think Ted was 14 then."

It was the mid-1980s, and Ronald Reagan was Cruz's hero. Cruz's father
Rafael, who had emigrated from Cuba, followed the oil business down to the
Houston suburbs. And there, his son inhabited a world that was safe, quiet
and insulated.

Cruz attended Second Baptist High School. It's on the campus of a
megachurch tucked near a country club in a leafy, affluent neighborhood. He
was valedictorian there — as well as captain of the speech team and a
member of the newspaper and yearbook staffs.

He was also president of the drama club.

Cruz loved being on stage, even if it meant being the villain. In junior
high school, he had played Rolfe, the young Nazi in The Sound of Music. He
landed the role of the murderer Bill Sikes in Oliver during high school. In
his senior yearbook, Cruz is leaning dramatically into a microphone — under
the title "Most Likely To Become The Next Geraldo Rivera."

Doug Daniels was a year behind Cruz at Second Baptist. He first met the
future senator in Spanish class, after Cruz had just transferred from
another high school midyear.

"And it was not very long before Ted was raising his hand and answering
questions, like he had been there from not only the beginning of the class
but the beginning of the school year," said Daniels. "At the time I
probably wouldn't have used this word, but now I will say it was
intimidating."

A newcomer who refuses to hold back. That's how Cruz has marked his first
couple years in the Senate, too. And it's a style that's won him legions of
fans in his home state.

"I think he's very passionate about things that most Texans believe, or
else he wouldn't be as popular as he is," said Wally Wilkerson, the
longest-serving local GOP chairman in Texas. Wilkerson's been chair in
Montgomery County — just north of Houston — since 1964.

"If you might have any disagreement with Ted Cruz, it might be over his
passion or his actions or whatever, but not what his beliefs are,"
Wilkerson said.

Cruz might not be the stereotypical Texan — he's more Ivy League than
cowboy, more fighter than horse-trader — but he seems to get Texas.
Consider this: After infuriating many of his Senate colleagues, who blamed
him for the government shutdown in 2013, Cruz was the highest rated
politician in all of Texas.

But Wilkerson says there's one thing that might be an unexpected weakness
for a Latino from Texas.

"As a Hispanic, by nature and by birth, you would think the Hispanics would
be attracted by that," said Wilkerson. "But I think there's something there
that hadn't clicked. And I think that could be a problem for him."

It's a tension that feels especially pronounced in Cruz's hometown of
Houston, which is more than 40 percent Hispanic.

Houston is no longer the city of oil rig workers. This massive, sprawling
metropolis is now home to one of the most racially diverse populations in
the country. Drive just 10 minutes outside Cruz's old high school, and
you'll find streets lined with Indian clothing shops, Middle Eastern food
stores and Guatemalan eateries.

The sheltered pocket where Cruz grew up bumps right up against the city of
immigrants Houston has become. And many in these parts struggle to call
Cruz their hometown hero — especially in a Latino neighborhood called
Aldine. Near the airport, it's one of the poorest communities in Houston.

"He's just so — I don't know how you say this in English — humilde. He's
not a humble person to want to help people who actually need help," said
Nancy Yanes. She says her parents came to the U.S. illegally from El
Salvador 30 years ago, and she doesn't like that Cruz opposes a path to
citizenship for people like her parents.

"You might be from Houston, but it doesn't really seem like you care about
the people in Texas, in Houston," Yanes said.

But Cruz's friends say he's not someone who was ever running for mayor of
Houston. And Cruz has stuck to the same conservative principles he used to
recite as a teenager.

"I don't think you'll find a single person who knew him in high school who
is at all surprised where he is now," Daniels said. "He had direction. I
mean, you knew Ted had a plan."

And that plan always seemed bigger than home. The kid who was never afraid
to raise his hand in class — who never avoided the stage even if he had to
play the bad guy — would naturally go for the biggest brass ring: the White
House.

*Cruz: US should withdraw from UN Human Rights Commission
<http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/246852-cruz-us-should-withdraw-from-un-human-rights-commission>
// The Hill // Ben Kamisar – July 3, 2015 *

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) is calling on the United States to withdraw its
membership from the United Nations Human Rights Commission over its vote
Friday to condemn Israel for the 2014 conflict with Palestinians.

The commission voted 41-1 on the resolution Friday, with five abstentions,
to condemn Israel for targeting civilians. America was the only country to
vote against it.

“Our single vote in opposition is just and the abstentions of our friends
are welcome, but at this point they are meaningless gestures. It is time to
stop ceding moral authority to the UNHRC and tell the truth about this
hopelessly biased and anti-Semitic institution,” Cruz said in a statement
Friday.

“The United States should stop legitimizing the UNHRC with our membership
and withdraw now.”

The 2014 conflict stemmed from Israel’s response to Hamas sympathizers
launching rockets from Palestinian territories into the country. Israel’s
military operation killed more than 1,000 civilians, drawing widespread
criticism from Palestinians and the international community.

But Israel has argued the Palestinians purposefully put civilians in harms
way and that it needed to protect itself from the scores of rocket attacks
on its country.

Cruz, an ardent supporter of Israel, backed the Jewish homeland in his
statement and chided the U.N. for ignoring the Israeli perspective in the
resolution.

“There is no equivalency between Israel’s right to self-defense and Hamas’
genocidal aggression against the Jewish people,” he said.

“There is no equivalence between Israel’s extraordinary efforts to protect
civilians and Hamas’ use of the Palestinian people as human shields.”

*Cruz owns mistakes, offers fresh insight
<http://www.houstonchronicle.com/life/books/article/Cruz-owns-mistakes-offers-fresh-insight-6365406.php>
// Houston Chronicle // Todd J. Gillman – July 3, 2015 *

Ted Cruz has a recurring problem with being too cocky and at key points in
his life, and that has come with a price. He arrived in Washington intent
on bending the Senate toward a conservative agenda, and sometimes he has
succeeded. When he didn't, it was probably because his GOP colleagues were
timid, wrong or even duplicitous.

These are the Texas senator's own observations in "A Time for Truth," a
book that hit shelves last week.

Long passages defending his role in the government shutdown and his
antipathy toward President Barack Obama, Obamacare, Iran, Russia, squishy
moderates and lots of other targets are familiar to anyone who has ever
heard Cruz speak. But there are plenty of fresh insights.

Cruz owns up to a number of mistakes since joining the Senate. Some of
these amount to underestimating the eagerness of most fellow Republicans to
shy away from a fight and abandon conservative principles. Top Republicans
come in for special opprobrium - though it is notable that not once does
Cruz call out fellow Texan, John Cornyn, by name.

Time and again, Cruz blasts "the Republican leadership," often chastising
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky while glossing entirely past
Cornyn's role as majority whip, the party's No. 2 leader.

In the run-up to the 16-day government shutdown in fall 2013, Cruz writes,
"What we did not anticipate was that Mitch McConnell and the GOP leadership
team would decide to publicly, directly and aggressively lead the fight
against the House Republicans and in favor of Obamacare. Perhaps they
wanted to discourage conservatives like (Utah Sen. Mike Lee) and me from
ever again rebelling against the party line. Or perhaps they were simply
angry that a handful of senators would have the temerity to take our case
straight to the American people."

Some of the most venomous passages concern the "surrender" by GOP leaders
to end the government shutdown, handing the "radical left" a huge victory
in its march toward socialized medicine.

Early in Cruz's Senate tenure, he caused a stir during the confirmation
hearing for Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel. Hagel had repeatedly refused to
detail the source of some of his income, in particular $200,000 that
apparently came from a foreign source. Without full disclosure, Cruz said,
Congress had no way to know if the funds had come from North Korea. Critics
pounced; the insinuation smacked of McCarthyism, they said.

"I made a mistake," Cruz writes. "I allowed the White House and the
Democrats to change the subject" from Hagel's "disastrous foreign policy
record," in particular his "antagonism" toward Israel.

Cruz also antagonized Sen. Dianne Feinstein at a hearing over proposed gun
restrictions after the Newtown, Conn., school massacre. He asked a lawyerly
question comparing potential Second Amendment restrictions to analogous
erosion of First or Fourth Amendment rights. It came off condescending and
Feinstein shot him down by saying, "I am not a sixth grader."

In the moment, Cruz lost the image battle. In the book, he explains his
motive - not to embarrass but to engage in the way he'd been trained as a
Supreme Court litigator. "Her reaction puzzled me. Of course she wasn't a
sixth grader. No one would ask a sixth grader a substantive question of
constitutional law," he writes.

He learned his lesson, he said, when the exchange went viral online: "In
the U.S. Senate, senators are not used to actual debate. They are
unaccustomed to finding their positions questioned or challenged in any
meaningful way."

In 1999, Cruz had taken an 80 percent pay cut to serve as a domestic policy
adviser on the Bush campaign, giving up a job at a boutique appellate law
firm in Washington to move to Austin. Bush, a morning person (unlike Cruz)
would sometimes call at 6 a.m. to discuss a memo or policy in Cruz's
portfolio, which included gay marriage, taxes, criminal law, immigration
and gun rights. Cruz found Bush inquisitive, remarkably charismatic and
self-deprecating.

"Perhaps with the exception of a few junior staffers like me, Bush was
always the most conservative person in the room," Cruz writes.

But by 2008, Cruz had grown disenchanted with the Bush administration. He
disagreed with the bailouts of major Wall Street banks, and rather than
revitalizing the Reagan Revolution, "it took the Republican Party down the
path of bigger government, excessive spending and new entitlement programs
that we couldn't afford. A Republican president should not add $5 trillion
to the national debt."

Still, Cruz draws a rhetorical link between Bush's "compassionate
conservatism" and his own "opportunity conservatism." Both, he suggests,
stem from a desire to encourage growth and economic progress, but in his
view, Bush's went astray by turning it into an excuse for intrusive
government.

One of Cruz's great disappointments was failing to land a senior position
in the Bush White House after the campaign. Instead, he spent a few months
as a deputy attorney general, then two as a senior attorney at the Federal
Trade Commission.

"I desperately wanted to be a real leader in the Bush administration," he
writes. "When that didn't happen, it was a crushing blow."

But it forced him to take stock.

"I was far too cocky for my own good," Cruz writes, and he "burned a fair
number of bridges on the Bush campaign."

"Going through that experience altered my personality, and forced me to
view the world differently, to treat others with greater respect and
humility," he writes. "I needed to get my teeth kicked in. And if that
hadn't happened, there's no way I would be in the U.S. Senate today."

*CHRISTIE*

*Exclusive: Chris Christie hires presidential campaign manager and appoints
senior staff
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/03/exclusive-chris-christie-hires-presidential-campaign-manager-and-appoints-senior-staff/>
// WaPo // Philip Rucker – July 3, 2015 *

Gov. Chris Christie has hired a seasoned Republican strategist to manage
his nascent presidential campaign and has recruited other veteran
operatives to round out a senior staff that also will include the top
advisers who charted his rise in New Jersey.

Ken McKay, a well-regarded operative who previously has served as chief of
staff at the Republican National Committee and as political director of the
Republican Governors Association, has joined the Christie operation as
campaign manager.

Joining McKay at the top of the Christie campaign is Maria Comella, the
governor's longtime communications adviser and close confidante, who is
becoming the campaign's chief messaging officer. Comella, who had been
deputy chief of staff for communications and planning in the governor's
office, will have a broad mandate on the campaign overseeing Christie's
message, communications and brand.

Christie advisers provided a list of campaign staffing moves to The
Washington Post.

Once considered a front-runner for the 2016 nomination, Christie is now far
back in a crowded field and will be relying on a small campaign team to
guide his comeback.

McKay will be overseeing the campaign's nuts-and-bolts political operations
from the national headquarters in Morristown, N.J., while Comella will
serve as Christie's right-hand adviser, often traveling with him and
helping him hone his message and campaign trail performance.

As expected, Mike DuHaime, who guided Christie's successful 2009 and 2013
gubernatorial runs and held senior positions on the George W. Bush, Rudy
Giuliani and John McCain presidential campaigns and at the Republican
National Committee, will serve as the senior strategist and lead a team of
outside consultants.

Russ Schriefer, who created the gubernatorial television advertisements
that helped define the Christie brand, will be the campaign's lead media
consultant. He is a veteran of presidential campaigns, most recently
serving as senior adviser and media consultant on Mitt Romney's 2012
campaign. Larry Weitzner, who worked with Schriefer on media for Christie's
2009 and 2013 campaigns, will be another media consultant.

Adam Geller, who was Christie's lead pollster in both governor's races,
will serve in the same capacity on the presidential campaign.

The governor's closest counselor and the gatekeeper to his political orbit,
Bill Palatucci, will serve as the campaign's general counsel. Palatucci
will oversee all legal aspects, including ballot access issues and delegate
math during what could become a lengthy nominating contest.

Palatucci, who will remain as a fundraiser and all-around adviser, is
uniquely suited for the legal position considering his years of experience
on the RNC and on the Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush presidential
campaigns.

The senior staff combines advisers with personal histories with the
governor and newcomers to the Christie orbit who bring experiences from
past presidential campaigns as well as the technology sector.

"Governor Christie's 2016 campaign team combines a core group from his
gubernatorial victories with an infusion of incredibly talented individuals
who have worked at the highest levels in American politics," said DuHaime,
who has recruited several former colleagues from the Giuliani campaign and
the RNC onto the Christie team.

Some of Christie's team comes from the governor's office, where the top two
aides who remain are chief of staff Regina Egea and chief counsel
Christopher Porrino.

Ray Washburne, a Dallas investor and fundraising powerhouse who most
recently served as the RNC's national finance chairman, will hold the title
of national finance chairman for Christie's campaign. Other members of the
finance committee are expected to be named in coming weeks.

Working with Washburne as fundraising director is Cam Henderson, who served
as executive director of the Hurricane Sandy Relief Fund from 2012 to 2014
and before that was chief of staff to first lady Mary Pat Christie.
Henderson has held more political positions, including as deputy campaign
manager for Giuliani's 2008 presidential campaign, working alongside
DuHaime and Comella.

Christie has hired James Garcia as political director. During the 2012
presidential race, Garcia served as Romney's national field director during
the primaries and as Colorado state manager in the general election. He
most recently served as regional political director at the RNC.

Another relatively new addition to the Christie team is Samantha Smith, who
will serve as communications director. She joined Christie's Leadership
Matters for America PAC from Google, where she was a senior manager on the
tech company's global communications and public policy team. She previously
was a communications aide for Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) as well as on
McCain's 2008 campaign.

The campaign's digital director will be Lauren Fritts, a former Fox News
Channel employee who for the past four years has been digital
communications director in the governor's office, where she managed
Christie's active presence on YouTube and such social media as Facebook,
Snapchat and Twitter.

The research and rapid response director will be Foster Morss, who has
worked in the governor's office and previously served on Giuliani's
campaign and at the RNC as a senior analyst and deputy research director.

Several former George W. Bush presidential campaign staffers have signed on
with Christie as consultants. Brian Jones, a former RNC communications
director who worked on the Romney, McCain and Bush campaigns, will be
senior communications consultant.

Brent Seaborn, who led the groundbreaking microtargeting project during
Bush's 2004 reelection campaign, will be Christie's voter targeting
consultant.

Meanwhile, Kevin Shuvalov, a staffer on Bush's 2000 campaign and former RNC
aide who has extensive experience in Iowa, will be the direct-mail
consultant.  And Cary Evans, a former Bush and Giuliani adviser who now is
based in Washington state and has experience in Nevada and other western
states, will be the telemarketing consultant.

Christie plans to open campaign offices in Iowa, New Hampshire and South
Carolina. But his strategic focus is squarely on New Hampshire, which hosts
the first-in-the-nation presidential primary and where he is beginning to
build a robust staff.

Matt Mowers, a former Christie aide who moved to New Hampshire following
the governor's 2013 reelection to become executive director of the state
Republican Party, will serve as New Hampshire state director.

The New Hampshire political director will be Britt Carter, who spent the
2014 midterm campaign cycle in New Hampshire focused on building a modern,
grass-roots field program for state Republicans. Matt Moroney, who has deep
roots in New Hampshire and served as a field staffer for Romney in 2012 and
gubernatorial candidate Walt Havenstein in 2014, will be New Hampshire
operations director.

In Iowa, home to the first caucuses, Christie's campaign will be directed
by Phil Valenziano, a longtime operative in the Hawkeye State. He served as
political director on Gov. Terry Branstad's 2014 reelection campaign and as
director of the governor's inauguration. In 2012, Valenziano served as
Romney's Iowa field director for the caucuses and as New Hampshire state
director in the general election. He will be joined in Iowa by state
political director Kevin Poindexter, who has worked at the RNC and for
Romney's 2012 campaign.

Christie's sanctioned super PAC, America Leads -- which has set a goal of
raising $5 million to $6 million by the close of the fundraising quarter
that ended June 30 -- recently announced its senior staff.

It will be led by Phil Cox, who is considered one of the country's top
Republican strategists and most recently served as executive director of
the Republican Governors Association while Christie was chairman.

The super PAC's advertising and media strategy will be overseen by Doug
McAuliffe, a veteran of gubernatorial, Senate and House campaigns. Gene
Ulm, a partner at Public Opinion Strategies whose clients include Rep. Paul
Ryan, the 2012 vice presidential nominee, will be the super PAC's pollster.

Tucker Martin, a longtime Virginia-based consultant who previously worked
as former Virginia governor Robert McDonnell's communications director,
will direct communications for the super PAC. Mike Leavitt, a former RNC
chief of staff and veteran strategist who helped guide Maryland Gov. Larry
Hogan's underdog campaign in 2014, will handle direct mail.

The super PAC's fundraising will be overseen by Paige Hahn, who ran
fundraising operations at the RGA from 2011 to 2014, during which the
association raised a record $250 million. And Kurt Luidhardt, who has
worked for Christie and other Republicans, including Wisconsin Gov. Scott
Walker, will handle digital efforts.

Correction: An earlier version of this post misspelled Larry Weitzner's
last name.

*For Chris Christie, the truth hurts
<http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/07/03/chris-christie-pretense-truth-telling-column/29593785/>
// USA Today // Windsor Mann – July 3, 2015 *

The only thing worse than a lying politician is one who tells the truth.
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is the latter, or at least he pretends
to be.

Announcing his presidential candidacy on Tuesday, Christie vowed to speak
the truth. "I mean what I say and I say what I mean, and that's what
America needs right now," he said, presumably meaning it.

Many of the truths Christie evoked on Tuesday are indisputable. "I became
governor six years ago" (True). "We have a president in the Oval Office"
(True). In the not-a-news-flash file: "Both parties have failed our
country." He also pointed out that "compromise" is not "a dirty word."
Indeed, one can even say it on network television.

Christie is all about telling the truth — or, rather, all about telling
people he will tell them the truth. He promised "a campaign of big ideas
and hard truths," and reminded the audience of his truth track record: "As
governor I've never wavered from telling you the truth as I see it."

What qualifies as truths in Christie's lexicon are mostly bromides, the
utterance of which he considers an act of courage. He notified the crowd,
"We just need to have the courage to stand up and say, 'Enough!'" This
requires no courage at all, only functioning legs and the ability to
enunciate two syllables.

"What are those truths?" Christie asked. "We have to acknowledge that our
government isn't working anymore for us." This is a platitude, not a truth,
but Christie still wants credit for telling it.

If Christie intends on telling the truth, rather than merely talking about
telling it, he is courting disaster. In politics, telling the truth is a
liability, not an asset.

Richard Nixon's claim not to be a crook, though absurd and disingenuous,
was shrewd compared to the alternative. It would have been far worse
politically if he had said, "People have got to know whether or not their
president is a crook. And just so you know, I am."

Jimmy Carter, who promised never to lie to the American people, surely
wasn't lying when he confessed to having "looked on a lot of women with
lust." This was simply an acknowledgement of biological reality, but it
survives as perhaps Carter's most notorious statement.

Walter Mondale, upon accepting the 1984 Democratic presidential nomination,
spoke the truth when he said he would raise taxes. The result? He won one
state out of 50.

Contrary to myth, Americans don't dislike pandering. They dislike blatant
pandering, which is Hillary Clinton's specialty. Once a proponent of the
Trans-Pacific Partnership deal, she now is equivocal. She was for the Iraq
war when it was popular and against it when it became unpopular. During her
first Senate campaign, she claimed she had "always been a Yankees fan." She
reminds me of the woman in Coming to America who, when asked what kind of
music she likes, answers, "Whatever kind of music you like."

Christie is adopting the opposite strategy, willing, even eager, to tell
you that your favorite band sucks. He vowed to run "a campaign without spin
or without pandering or focus-group-tested answers" — a line that polls
well in focus groups. Telling voters you will not pander to them is itself
a form of pandering. Voters want to be told the truth, not what they want
to hear, unless the truth is different from what they want to hear.

"You're going to get what I think whether you like it or not, or whether it
makes you cringe every once in a while or not," Christie said. But the goal
of a presidential candidate is to get elected, not to express
cringe-inducing thoughts. Politicians who do the latter lose elections.
Remember Todd Akin?

If Christie has thoughts, he failed to elucidate them on Tuesday. Instead,
he clarified his approach to Q&A. "When I'm asked a question," he averred,
"I'm going to give the answer to the question that's asked." Needless to
say, he doesn't always do this. When asked about immigration last year,
Christie said, "I'm not going to discuss a complicated issue like
immigration here in Marion, Iowa." For reasons left unexplained, the
residents of Marion, Iowa, are precluded from hearing the truth about
immigration.

Christie said he "will not worry about what is popular but what is right."
Voters prefer politicians who do the right thing to politicians who do
whatever is popular, except when doing the right thing happens to be
unpopular. If Christie doesn't know this already, he will learn soon.

*Christie to spend the night at Romney’s New Hampshire home
<http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/246847-christie-to-spend-the-night-at-romneys-new-hampshire-home>
// The Hill // Ben Kamisar – July 3, 2015 *

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) will meet with
2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney during Fourth of July
swings through New Hampshire.

The Washington Post reports that Christie and his wife, Mary Pat, will have
dinner at the Romney’s Lake Winnipesaukee home, where they will stay the
night. And Time adds that Rubio will stay there as well.

“Governor Romney heard that his friends, Governor Christie and Senator
Rubio, along with their families, would be in Wolfeboro over the July 4th
holiday weekend,” a Romney spokesperson told Time. “He and Mrs. Romney
opened their home to their friends and look forward to celebrating
America’s birthday.”

The summer house is a six-bedroom, 5,400 square-foot home right on the
water a tennis court and a horse stable, according to a 2012 blog on the
real estate website Zillow.

Christie is in the Granite State, home of the second presidential
nominating contest, as part of a five-day swing. He immediately went north
after he announced his candidacy earlier this week, setting up shop in New
Hampshire after a quick swing through Maine, where he won the endorsement
of Gov. Paul LePage (R).

The morning after they spend the night at Romney’s Wolfeboro home, both
candidates will walk in the town's Fourth of July parade.

Rubio has also been traveling through New Hampshire and plans to walk with
supporters at the parade, before traveling to Chicago on Tuesday.

*PERRY*

*Rick Perry wants to reach out to black people. He’ll have to do a lot
better.
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/07/03/rick-perry-wants-to-reach-out-to-black-people-hell-have-to-do-a-lot-better/>
// WaPo // Paul Waldman – July 3, 2015 *

Yesterday, Rick Perry went to the National Press Club in Washington to
deliver a speech that may have seemed unusual, in that it was characterized
as an effort to reach out to African Americans, but actually contained much
less than meets the eye. Perry presented traditional Republican priorities
— tax cuts, regulatory rollback, slashing safety net programs — as a gift
the GOP wants to bestow on African Americans and acknowledged that his
party hasn’t exactly been welcoming to them. But if this is “reaching out”
beyond the whites who form almost the entirety of the GOP’s voters, it
isn’t going to accomplish much. Here’s an excerpt:

There has been, and there will continue to be an important and a legitimate
role for the federal government in enforcing Civil Rights. Too often, we
Republicans, me included, have emphasized our message on the 10th Amendment
but not our message on the 14th. An Amendment, it bears reminding, that was
one of the great contributions of Republican party to American life, second
only to the abolition of slavery.

For too long, we Republicans have been content to lose the black vote,
because we found we didn’t need it to win. But, when we gave up trying to
win the support of African-Americans, we lost our moral legitimacy as the
party of Lincoln, as the party of equal opportunity for all. It’s time for
us, once again, to reclaim our heritage as the only party in our country
founded on the principle of freedom for African-Americans.

We know what Democrats will propose in 2016, the same thing, the same
things that Democrats have proposed for decades, more government spending
on more government programs. And there is a proper and an important role
for government assistance in keeping people on their feet. But few
Presidents have done more to expand government assistance than President
Obama. Today we spend nearly one trillion dollars a year on means tested
antipoverty programs. And yet, black poverty remains stagnant.

Let’s be clear about one thing: The GOP didn’t “give up” trying to win the
black vote. It spent decades building and maintaining electoral majorities
on the encouragement and exploitation of racism. It was a sin of
commission, not a sin of omission. And the reason the party is now
reevaluating the “Southern strategy” isn’t that it had some kind of moral
epiphany, it’s because the strategy doesn’t work anymore.

While we’re on this topic, permit me a digression on this “party of
Lincoln” business, which is something Republicans say when they’re trying
to convince people they aren’t actually hostile to black people. As Antonin
Scalia would say, it’s pure applesauce. Here’s the truth: One hundred fifty
years ago, the Republican Party was the liberal party, and the Democratic
Party was the conservative party. They reversed those positions over time
for a variety of reasons, but the Republicans of today are not Abraham
Lincoln’s heirs. Ask yourself this: If he had been around in 1864, which
side do you think Rick Perry would have been on? If you took more than half
a second to answer, “The Confederacy, of course,” then you’re being way too
generous to him, not to mention the overwhelming majority of his fellow
Republicans.

All that isn’t to say that it’s impossible for Republicans to turn over a
new leaf and truly give African Americans a reason to consider their party.
But if they’re going to be at all successful, it will take both a change in
policy and a change in attitude.

A change in policy, at least outside of some very specific areas, is
extremely unlikely to happen. Perry discussed the issue of incarcerations
related to the drug war, and that’s one example where Republicans really
are coming together with Democrats to reevaluate the policies of recent
decades. They deserve credit for that. But there’s almost nothing else
they’re offering, other than to argue that the things they already wanted
to do, such as cutting taxes, will be great for black people, too.

Then there’s the argument Perry and others make about safety net programs:
that people of color are being enslaved by them, and if we only cut those
shackles then they’ll rise up. This argument — that the Republican Party
wants to slash the safety net only because it cares so much for the poor —
has never persuaded anyone in the past, and it isn’t likely to in the
future.

And what about the change in attitude? The most fundamental reason
Republicans can’t get the votes of African Americans is that the party
communicates to them, again and again and again, that it isn’t just
ignoring their needs but is actively hostile to them. When conservative
justices gut the Voting Rights Act to the cheers of Republicans, and then
states such as Perry’s Texas move immediately to impose voting restrictions
that they know will disproportionately affect African Americans, it sends a
very clear message.

Perry began his speech with a harrowing story of a lynching in Texas in
1916, which was surely meant to convey to African Americans that he
understands the legacy of racism. But it also sends an accompanying
message: that he believes racism is about the violent oppression of the
past and has nothing to do with the lives African Americans lead today. And
that’s another message African Americans hear loud and clear. Every time
any issue of race comes up, whether it’s about police mistreatment or
discrimination in employment or anything else, the first response of
conservatives is always to say, “Oh c’mon, what are you complaining about?
Racism is over.”

If Perry really wanted to “reach out” to African Americans and convince
them that something has changed, here’s a way he could do it: He could say
something about the endless stream of race-baiting that comes from the most
prominent conservative media figures. If you’ve listened to Rush Limbaugh
or watched Bill O’Reilly, you know that one of the central themes of their
programs is that white people are America’s only victimized racial group,
while African Americans form a criminal class that deserves to be
constantly harassed by the police because they’re a bunch of thugs the rest
of us need protection from. Day in and day out, those programs’ white
audiences are told that Obama is some kind of Black Panther enacting a
campaign of racial vengeance upon them. “All too often I have seen this
president divide us by race,” says Perry, when the media figures his party
lionizes are constantly telling their audiences to see politics through the
lens of their own whiteness and nurture their racial resentments.

And Perry can tell black people that it’s welfare that’s really keeping
them down, but because of his party, the first African American president
had to literally show his birth certificate to prove he’s a real American.
That’s just one of the things it’s going to take an awful lot of reaching
out to make them forget.

*Rick Perry made a big speech on states’ rights and race. But his policies
don’t follow.
<http://www.vox.com/2015/7/3/8888375/rick-perry-states-rights> // Vox //
German Lopez – July 3, 2015 *

Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry is getting a lot of credit for a speech he
made Thursday, in which he acknowledged that Republicans have historically
touted states' rights to neglect and oppress black Americans. But while
Perry's speech has a lot of nice language to chew on, his policies
certainly don't reflect the same awareness.

"I know Republicans have much to do to earn the trust of African Americans.
Blacks know that Republican Barry Goldwater in 1964 ran against Lyndon
Johnson, who was a champion for civil rights," Perry, a Republican who's
running for president, said at the National Press Club, according to
BuzzFeed's Evan McMorris-Santoro. "They know that Barry Goldwater opposed
the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He felt parts of it were unconstitutional.
States supporting segregation in the South, they cited states' rights as a
justification for keeping blacks from the voting booth and the dinner
table."

Some pundits applauded Perry's comments. New York magazine's Jonathan
Chait, for example, described them as an "important, historic concession."
He later clarified that Perry's comments are "best judged against the
backdrop of nonsense through which most conservatives view racial history."

It's true that some Republicans deny the blatant racism of conservatives in
the civil rights era, and it's refreshing to see Perry acknowledge those
problems. But giving Perry too much credit for his comments lets him get
away with saying nice things while not acting on them.

In the same speech, Perry used the states' right argument — which he
acknowledged was employed by conservatives in the past to oppress black
people — to support polices that disproportionately hurt African Americans.
He said he still backs strict voter ID laws that studies show would likely
stop more minority Americans from voting than their white counterparts. And
he said state governments should still be allowed to decide whether to fly
the Confederate Flag, a symbol of white supremacy and racist policies like
slavery.

By all accounts, Perry also still supports the Supreme Court decision in
Shelby County v. Holder — a challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, a
hallmark civil rights legislation — that ended up striking down a key part
of the law that let the federal government oversee elections in places with
a history of discrimination. The political argument against this law has
always been that the federal government was limiting states' rights by
controlling how they run elections. But the numbers are clear: The Voting
Rights Act overwhelmingly benefited black voters, who were stopped from
voting by states through poll taxes, literacy tests, and outright violence
prior to the law. Yet Perry called the legislation "outdated" and
"unnecessary."

To his credit, Perry restated his support for criminal justice reforms that
will help wind down mass incarceration and the war on drugs, both of which
have disproportionately hurt black people. But these are reforms Perry
supported before his speech and as governor of Texas. They're nothing new
for him.

So Perry may be changing his words — and doing so in a welcome way for
those concerned about the many racial disparities in the American political
and justice system. But so far he's not changing his policies to match them.

*Rick Perry: Trump Made ‘Huge Error,’ Painted Mexicans with Broad Brush
<http://www.mediaite.com/tv/rick-perry-trump-made-huge-error-painted-mexicans-with-broad-brush/>
// Mediaite // Josh Feldman – July 3, 2015 *

Texas Governor Rick Perry said on Fox News yesterday that Donald Trump was
absolutely wrong in his comments about Mexican immigrant criminals and
rapists.

Perry told Charles Payne, “I don’t think he’s reflecting the Republican
party with his statements about Mexicans. I think that was a huge error on
his part.”

He said Trump painted all Mexicans “with a very broad brush,” and
contrasted The Donald’s “shoot from the hip” style with his own experience,
saying, “Nobody knows that border better than I do.”

Perry deferred a bit on the question of whether companies like NBC and
Macy’s are right to dump Trump, but said he didn’t like the “Mexicans are
bad people” implication of Trump’s remarks.

And then… oh, you’ll never guess what happened next… Trump responded, this
time with a backhanded compliment

*Rick Perry: GOP Has Ignored Black Vote For Too Long
<http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/03/gov-perrys-straight-talk-on-race-winning-praise/>
// Breitbart // Sarah Rumpf – July 3, 2015 *

Perry’s speech, which is worth reading in full, featured brutally honest
discussions of historical events, beginning with the horrific story of a
17-year-old black boy named Jesse Washington, who was brutally tortured and
lynched by a mob outside a county courthouse in Waco, Texas in 1916.

Washington’s lynching, said Perry, was an event that could not be ignored,
and demanded action:

Even today, we Texans struggle to talk about what happened to Jesse
Washington. We don’t want to believe that our great state could ever have
been the scene of such unimaginable horror.

But it is an episode in our history that we cannot ignore. It is an episode
we have an obligation to transcend.

We’ve made a lot of progress since 1916.

One example of that progress that Perry experienced was when, as Governor
of Texas, he appointed Wallace Jefferson to be the first black Texas
Supreme Court Justice and then, in 2004, made Jefferson Texas’ first black
Chief Justice.

“There are tens of thousands of stories like Wallace Jefferson’s,”
continued Perry, describing America as “a country with Hispanic CEOs, and
Asian billionaires, and a black President.”

“When it comes to race, America is a better and more tolerant and more
welcoming place than it has ever been. So why is it that even today, so
many black families feel left behind?” asked Perry, noting that
African-Americans continued to economically lag behind other Americans.

Democrats have long had the opportunity to govern in African-American
communities.

It is time to help black families hold them accountable for the results.

I am here to tell you that it is Republicans, not Democrats, who are truly
offering black Americans the hope of a better life for themselves and their
children.

I am proud to live in a country with an African-American President. But
President Obama cannot be proud of the fact that the prevalence of black
poverty has actually increased under his leadership.

Acknowledging that the “historical legacy” of slavery and segregation had a
role in black poverty — a statement not frequently heard from Republican
politicians — as well as the government role in sanctioning both of those
evils, Perry said there did need to be a role for government in “addressing
their lasting effects.”

However, said Perry, the Democrats’ solutions had a proven track record of
failure, giving examples of the billions of dollars spent on Medicaid with
no improvement in health outcomes, and the downward spirals seen in
Democrat-run cities including Detroit, Baltimore and Chicago.

“[T]he specific policies advanced by the President and his allies on the
left amount to little more than throwing money at the problem and walking
away,” said Perry. Black families are recognizing this, voting with their
feet by moving to cities such as Dallas and Houston. In fact, more blacks
moved to Texas from 2005 to 2007 than any other state except Georgia.

“Each new resident was welcomed to Texas, with open arms,” said Perry,
acknowledging that while his state hadn’t eliminated black poverty, it had
made meaningful progress. According to Perry, the supplemental poverty rate
for blacks is 20 percent, as compared to 26 percent in New York, 30 percent
in California, and 33 percent in Washington, D.C.

The way this was accomplished, explained Perry, was a combination of tort
reforms, low taxes and regulations that not only attracted jobs, but also
kept the cost of living low. The Texas economic miracle meant that there
were a lot of jobs available for people who wanted them, and the state’s
policies meant that the salaries people earned stretched a lot further than
in other states.

Because we curtailed frivolous lawsuits and unreasonable regulations in
Texas, it’s far cheaper to do business in Dallas or Houston than in
Baltimore or Detroit. And those lower costs get passed down to consumers –
especially low-income consumers – in the form of lower prices.

There’s a lot of talk in Washington about income inequality. But there’s a
lot less talk about the inequality that arises from the high cost of
everyday life.

In blue-state coastal cities, strict zoning laws and environmental
regulations have prevented builders from expanding the housing supply.
That’s great for the venture capitalist who wants a nice view of San
Francisco Bay, but it’s not so great for the single mother working two jobs
in order to pay rent and still put food on the table for her kids.

While his policy platform is in the final stages of development, Perry did
discuss his plan for welfare reform. A one-size-fits-all program did not
serve people’s needs, said Perry, noting that someone in California might
need more housing assistance, for example.

Perry’s solution would be to send to Congress a welfare reform bill that
would split the funds for non-health care-related, anti-poverty programs
into two parts. The first part would be a reformed and expanded version of
the Earned Income Tax Credit “so that anyone with a job can live above the
poverty line. The second would be “a block grant so that states can care
for their safety net populations in the manner that best serves their
residents.”

Texas also saw significant improvement in its education system, noted Perry
proudly, going from 27th in the U.S. in 2002 to 2nd in 2013 for high school
graduation rates. The improvement was even better for minority students,
with Texas earning the top rate for both African-American and Hispanic
students.

Perry also cited his support for the substantive criminal justice reforms
enacted in Texas. As Breitbart News previously reported, during Perry’s
tenure as Governor, he encouraged the Texas Legislature to pass bills that
invested money into diversion programs, drug treatment, and other
alternatives to incarceration instead of building prisons.

Perry focused on the human impact of Texas’ reforms. “Too many Texans were
going to prison for non-violent drug offenses. And once they got out of
prison, many found they couldn’t get a job because they had a criminal
record.”

The results have been remarkable, with the state saving some $2 billion and
closing three prisons, while the crime rate dropped to its lowest level
since 1968. Violent crime, property crime, juvenile offense and recidivism
all dropped across the board.

There is also a political advantage, as this kind of criminal justice
reform has cheerleaders on both the right and the left, and is an issue
with major potential for crossover appeal. Polling has consistently shown
strong bipartisan support for these reforms, and with Perry having been
governor of the state that is serving as the national model for criminal
justice, he owns this issue as no other candidate, Democrat or Republican,
can.

Perry then turned his remarks to politics, and the ongoing challenges that
Republicans have had earning black votes. “I am running for President
because I want to make life better for all people, even those who don’t
vote Republican,” he said, but “I know Republicans have much to do to earn
the trust of African-Americans.”

Reaffirming his support for the Tenth Amendment, Perry acknowledged that
conservatives’ support for the states’ rights protected therein sounded
similar to the arguments used by segregationists, even though that was not
their intention. Rather, Perry explained, his enthusiasm for the Tenth
Amendment was rooted in the principle that “state governments are more
accountable to you than the federal government.”

However, Perry said, he was “also an ardent believer in the Fourteenth
Amendment,” which guarantees that the government shall not deny any person
the equal protection of law. Including the rights protected by the
Fourteenth Amendment in any discussion about the Tenth was critically
important, said Perry, if the Republican Party wanted to retain its “moral
legitimacy as the party of Lincoln”:

Too often, we Republicans – myself included – have emphasized our message
on the Tenth Amendment but not our message on the Fourteenth – an
Amendment, it bears reminding, that was one of the first great
contributions of the Republican Party to American life, second only to the
abolition of slavery.

For too long, we Republicans have been content to lose the black vote
because we found that we could win elections without it. But when we gave
up on trying to win the support of African-Americans, we lost our moral
legitimacy as the party of Lincoln. As the party of equal opportunity for
all.

It is time for us to once again reclaim our heritage as the only party in
our country founded on the principle of freedom for African-Americans.

In a question-and-answer session after his prepared remarks, Perry first
answered a question about entitlement reform. Yes, said Perry, he would
support means testing, quipping, “I’m pretty sure that Donald Trump can do
without Medicare.” The idea that the wealthiest Americans “have to be in
line for all those entitlement programs doesn’t make sense to me.” His
detailed plan for entitlement reform, as well as his tax plan, would be
released soon, he promised.

Perry also elaborated on his experience, an issue that he has made central
to his campaign. “This is not my first rodeo,” he said, noting he had
served in the Texas Legislature and as Lieutenant Governor — an office that
in Texas wields enormous influence over the Senate and the overall
legislative agenda — before becoming Governor, an office which he held for
fourteen years.

He emphasized that none of the reforms enacted while he was Governor — even
the 2003 tort reform that made Democrats howl — was passed with only
Republican votes. “There are a lot of things that we agree on,” said Perry,
and significant progress can be made with even a staunchly conservative
agenda, if you work to “find those things we agree on, bring Democrats and
Republicans together.”

“It makes sense to come up with ways to come together, not divide us,” said
Perry. “We need a President who will bring this country together,” the way
he was able to bring Texas together, and send a “powerful, powerful
message” to the American people.

Perry criticized Donald Trump’s recent comments regarding Mexican
immigrants. “I don’t think Donald Trump’s remarks reflect the Republican
Party,” he said. Instead, said Perry, the GOP was reflected in “people like
me” who had worked with people of all backgrounds in Texas, and in Eva
Guzman, who was the first Hispanic appointed to the Supreme Court of Texas.
Perry later elaborated more on his criticism of Trump in a Fox News
interview, as Breitbart News reported.

In Texas, added Perry, Hispanics are 40 percent more likely to have a job
and two times more likely to own a small business. And his successor, Gov.
Greg Abbott (R-TX), had campaigned on a platform of tough border security,
but still won the Hispanic vote by a solid margin.

“[Hispanic Texans] knew that there was a government in place that
represented their values and protected them and kept them secure,” said
Perry. “It is unquestionable what we have done” in Texas to improve Texans’
economic potential, and provide security, and this was something that
reaches all people. “I think we have a great message…the Republican Party
is where they need to be.”

Perry also cited his military experience, as the only candidate other than
extreme longshot Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)47% in the Republican
presidential primary who had served.

He was also one of the very few who had felt the burden of what it is to be
a Commander-in-Chief during the war on terror, seeing Texans deployed, and
“looking into the eyes of spouses and parents who lost their loved ones.”
Perry, who has been very outspoken in his criticism of the Obama
administration’s poor response to the VA hospital scandals, also spoke of
“looking into the eyes of young people” who had volunteered to serve our
country, but when they returned, did not receive the care they were owed.

These veterans “need a champion,” said Perry, “who goes into the White
House every day” to fight for them.

“I am a unique candidate,” said Perry. “Those experiences are unique. No
one else on that stage — no one — has that experience,” and after eight
years of Obama, “Americans will be looking for someone with experience, a
known leader, someone with a record of success.”

As noted, Perry’s speech was widely praised. Following a strong campaign
launch and solid first few weeks where he was impressing both grassroots
activists and policy wonks, Perry was commended for both his laudable
record, but also for his blunt, honest remarks about race and how the
Republican Party had failed to reach African-Americans.

National Review’s Charles C.W. Cooke voiced what many seemed to be thinking
when he tweeted, “I’ve been unexpectedly impressed with Rick Perry this
week. Another National Review contributor, Yuval Levin, called the speech
“an an ambitious and impressive performance,” adding that he was “hoping it
sets the tone for the coming campaign.”

Bill Kristol at the Weekly Standard tweeted his prediction that Perry would
move up in the polls in the aftermath of this speech, noting that Perry
“could claim to be the anti-DC, anti-establishment candidate who has
actually governed.”

*GRAHAM*

*Lindsey Graham tells Iowan: “I don’t want you to vote for me”
<http://www.cbsnews.com/news/lindsey-graham-tells-iowan-i-dont-want-you-to-vote-for-me/>
// CBS // Stephanie Condon – July 3, 2015 *

Conservative Sen. Lindsey Graham has made it clear he's extremely concerned
about the threat of Islamic terrorism, but he isn't willing to outlaw a
whole religion over it.

When a voter in Iowa suggested barring Islam in the U.S. in response to
ISIS, Graham quickly shut him down, the Des Moines Register reports.

"You know what, I'm not your candidate," Graham said, cutting him off. "I
don't want you to vote for me. I couldn't disagree with you more."

As he's said before, Graham told his audience Sioux City on Thursday night
that he would deal with ISIS by increasing the United States' military
presence in Iraq. Explaining his terse response to the voter's suggestion
to outlaw Islam, Graham told people, "I'm not trying to please him."

Lindsey Graham: "I'm running" because the world is falling apart

"I'm not putting up with that," he said. "He's got a right to say whatever
he wants to say, but I have an obligation to the Republican Party, to the
people of Iowa and the country as a whole to be firm on this. I'm not
buying into that construct. That's not the America that I want to lead."

Graham demonstrated a few times in Iowa his willingness to speak candidly.
In an interview from Iowa with the Huffington Post, the longtime senator
teared up talking about his friendship with Vice President Joe Biden.

"If you can't admire Joe Biden as a person, then probably you've got a
problem," he said, calling the vice president "the nicest man I think I've
ever met in politics."

Graham has a long way to go if he wants to gain traction in Iowa, one of
the first states to nominate presidential candidates for the Republican and
Democratic parties. A recent Quinnipiac poll of likely Iowa GOP caucus
goers showed Graham was registering at just 1 percent support.

*HUCKABEE*

*Presidential Candidate Mike Huckabee Uses Schizophrenia As A Slur, Gets It
Wrong
<http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2015/07/03/presidential-candidate-mike-huckabee-uses-schizophrenia-as-a-slur-gets-it-wrong/>
// Forbes // Emily Willingham – July 3, 2015 *

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee made a common error
recently in his attempts to mock what he sees as dissonance in the
decisions Chief Justice John Roberts has made in two high-profile Supreme
Court cases. In commenting on a Des Moines radio show about Roberts’
dissension from the decision regarding same-sex marriage and his decision
in favor of the Affordable Care Act, Huckabee said that Roberts

“apparently needs medication for schizophrenia.”

The National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) didn’t take too kindly to
the attempt to use schizophrenia as a slur or to the mischaracterization of
schizophrenia as involving a split personality, noting in a news release
that

“Schizophrenia is a mental illness that interferes with a person’s ability
to think clearly, manage emotions, make decisions and relate to others. It
affects about 1% of Americans. The average age of onset tends to be in the
late teens to early 20s for men and the late 20s to early 30s for women. It
does not mean that a person has a ‘split’ or multiple personalities.”

In fact, the disorder associated with multiple personalities has a name,
dissociative identity disorder. While the two can have overlap of some
symptoms, including auditory and visual hallucinations, delusions are the
primary symptom that characterizes schizophrenia whereas two or more
distinct personalities constitute the main feature of dissociative identity
disorder.

The latter remains a controversial diagnosis and is thought to trace to
extreme and often repeated traumatic experiences that lead the person with
the condition to wall off the recollections of those experiences in a
separate personality or personalities. It might be more common in girls and
women than in males.

Schizophrenia, on the other hand, has a genetic component with a pretty
high rate of co-occurrence in identical twins and is equally common in men
and women. It can involve a lifelong need to manage delusions and
hallucinations but violence is not, as seems to be a popular perception, a
key feature. Suicide, however, is devastatingly common, and occurs at a
rate of up to 10% of young men with schizophrenia.

While schizophrenia tends to be associated only with its negative
manifestations, some people with the condition, including the late John
Nash, have argued that some elements of it have been useful for them.
However, many people with schizophrenia struggle with gaining and keeping
employment, in part because of bias, and as NAMI points out in its
statement, the stigma around mental illnesses like schizophrenia itself
remains “a serious health problem.”

Mischaracterizing schizophrenia and attempting to use it as a slight, as
Huckabee did in his remarks, does nothing to diminish either the
misunderstanding or the stigma (I have reached out to the Huckabee campaign
for comment). He’s not the first, however, to try to use a neurological
condition against Roberts to criticize the chief justice’s decision.
“Conservative firebrand” Michael Savage, who once made headlines for
averring that in “99% of cases” of autism, the child is really “just a
brat,” tried to blame Roberts’ last decision on the Affordable Care Act on
the chief justice’s seizure medication.

*JINDAL*

*Bobby Jindal Really, Really, Really Hates Gay Marriage
<http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2015/07/bobby-jindal-really-really-really-hates-gay-marriage>
// Mother Jones // Kevin Drum – July 3, 2015 *

After three courts told him he had to, Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal will
finally allow his administration to issue marriage licenses to same-sex
couples today.

....Jindal's administration argued it's possible the Supreme Court's ruling
didn't apply to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, where Louisiana had
been defending its statewide ban....On Wednesday, the circuit court
actually went through the motion of confirming the Supreme Court has
jurisdiction over it.

....But Jindal's administration jumped on that as reason to delay even
further. The Fifth Circuit technically sent the case back to the lower,
district court where its earlier ruling in favor of the state had to be
corrected. The New Orleans Times-Picayune reported that Jindal's spokesman
said no same-sex couple would be recognized until the district court
formally reversed itself. And so it did that today."

I've seen several people wondering why Jindal wasted time with this, since
he knew perfectly well what the outcome would be. The answer is obvious:
He's trying to position himself as the most tea-partyish, most anti-Obama,
most combative conservative in the Republican field. So this is basically
brand marketing. Republican voters now know that no one will stand up for
traditional values as strongly as Bobby Jindal. Message sent and received.

*TRUMP*

*Donald Trump’s Lousy Week (Except for the Polling)
<http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/07/03/us/politics/donald-trumps-lousy-week-except-for-the-polling.html>
// NYT // Daniel Victor – July 2, 2015 *

Donald Trump has had a bad week.

The trouble began with his inflammatory remarks about Mexican immigrants
during a speech to announce his presidential candidacy on June 16.

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best,” Mr. Trump
declared. “They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots
of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing
drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are
good people.”

Interactive Feature | Who Is Running for President (and Who’s Not)? At
least a dozen Republicans and a handful of Democrats have expressed an
interest in running for their party’s 2016 presidential nomination.

Over the next week, each day seemed to bring a fresh blow to Mr. Trump. A
brief review of the wreckage might make you feel better about your troubles.

The business impact.

The remarks set off a cascade of condemnation that engulfed some of his
business dealings, beginning late last week with Univision announcing that
it would no longer carry the Trump-produced Miss USA or Miss Universe
pageants.

This week, more companies followed.

On Monday, NBCUniversal cut all ties with Mr. Trump, saying it would no
longer air the pageants or “The Apprentice.” Televisa, the world’s largest
Spanish-language media company, also cut ties. Carlos Slim, the Mexican
billionaire, scrapped a television project. And in Chicago, 5 Rabbit
Cerveceria pulled out of a beer partnership with a Trump Hotel bar, then
renamed some of its beers in a vulgar tribute to Mr. Trump.

On Tuesday, Mr. Trump sued Univision, accusing it of violating its
contract. Meanwhile, Farouk Systems, a hairdressing company, dropped
sponsorship of the pageants and involvement in “The Celebrity Apprentice.”

On Wednesday, Macy’s said it would drop his fashion line, which had been
sold in the store since 2004. (If all that wasn’t enough, his hotel chain
said it was investigating a possible payment card data breach.)

Petitions created on Change.org and MoveOn.org are pressuring other
companies to cut Mr. Trump loose, suggesting the financial toll could
continue to build.

The mockery.

As one might expect, late-night comedians have had a field day. Jimmy
Kimmel joked that NBC’s rejection of Mr. Trump’s beauty pageants was not
because they “treat women like cattle at a state fair. It was the thing
about Mexicans.”

Others had more pointed responses. Mayor Bill de Blasio of New York, while
announcing that the city is reviewing its contracts with Mr. Trump, said
his comments “do not represent the values of inclusion and openness that
define us as New Yorkers.” America Ferrera, the actress, said Mr. Trump
lives “in an outdated fantasy of a bigoted America.” Eva Longoria invoked
Hitler.

He has gained infamy in Mexico too, where an array of political figures
lashed out at the remarks.

And yet, polling remains solid.

But its wasn’t all bad for Mr. Trump. In several recent polls he has
trailed only Jeb Bush in the race for the Republican presidential
nomination, whether nationally or in key states like New Hampshire and
Iowa. Plus he can count Senator Ted Cruz among his defenders.

Mr. Trump, meanwhile, is unchastened. He has not apologized.

“Nothing that I stated was different from what I have been saying for many
years,” Mr. Trump said in a statement on Tuesday.

*Hispanic leaders want GOP field to condemn Trump’s ‘idiocy’
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/d7fd3852efb646109893755fcc32933f/hispanic-leaders-say-republican-party-must-condemn-trump>
// AP // Steve Peoples – July 3, 2015 *

Hispanic leaders are bristling at the largely tepid response by Republican
presidential candidates to Donald Trump's characterization of Mexican
immigrants as rapists and drug dealers.

Several 2016 contenders have brushed off Trump's comments while others have
ignored them. Marco Rubio, a Florida senator who is Hispanic, denounced
them as "not just offensive and inaccurate, but also divisive," after
declining for two weeks to address the matter directly. Another Hispanic in
the race, Ted Cruz, said Trump is "terrific," ''brash" and "speaks the
truth."

It's an uncomfortable moment for Republicans, who want more votes from the
surging Latino population.

And it could be a costly moment if more candidates don't go beyond their
Donald-will-be-Donald response and condemn him directly, said Alfonso
Aguilar, a Republican who leads the American Principles Project's Latino
Partnership.

"The time has come for the candidates to distance themselves from Trump and
call his comments what they are: ludicrous, baseless and insulting,"
Aguilar said. "Sadly, it hurts the party with Hispanic voters. It's a level
of idiocy I haven't seen in a long time."

So far, Trump has paid less of a political price than a commercial one.

The leading Hispanic television network, Univision, has backed out of
televising the Miss USA pageant, a joint venture between Trump and NBC,
which also cut ties with Trump. On Wednesday, the Macy's department store
chain, which carried a Donald Trump menswear line, said it was ending its
relationship with him. Other retailers are facing pressure to follow suit.

In his speech last month marking his entry into the Republican race, Trump
said Mexican immigrants are "bringing drugs. They're bringing crime.
They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."

The businessman has refused to back down, although he insists his remarks
were misconstrued.

"My statements have been contorted to seem racist and discriminatory," he
wrote in a message to supporters on Thursday. "What I want is for legal
immigrants to not be unfairly punished because others are coming into
America illegally, flooding the labor market and not paying taxes." His
original comments, though, did not make a distinction between Mexicans who
came to U.S. legally and those here illegally.

His rhetoric may resonate with some of the Republican Party's most
passionate voters, who have long viewed illegal immigration as one of the
nation's most pressing problems. But the 2016 contest brings opportunity
for the party to make inroads with Hispanics, with several Latino
candidates and a former Florida governor, Jeb Bush, who has deep Latino
ties and speaks Spanish and hasn't been shy about using it in the campaign.

Even so, Bush has said little more about Trump's comments than that they
were "wrong."

"Maybe we'll have a chance to have an honest discussion about it onstage,"
Bush said last weekend while campaigning in Nevada, referring to Republican
presidential debates.

Rev. Gabriel Salguero, president of the National Latino Evangelical
Coalition, is paying keen attention to how the candidates respond to
Trump's "xenophobic rhetoric."

"We're listening very, very closely, not just what candidates say but what
they don't say — the sins of commission and the sins of omission," he said.

Among 2016 contenders:

—New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie called Trump's comments "wholly
inappropriate." But in a subsequent radio interview, he said Trump is "a
really wonderful guy (who's) always been a good friend."

—Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry said: "I don't think Donald Trump's remarks
reflect the Republican Party."

—Cruz said he likes Trump and thinks NBC "is engaging in political
correctness" in breaking ties with him.

—Rubio said the next president "needs to be someone who brings Americans
together — not someone who continues to divide."

—Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, former
technology executive Carly Fiorina and retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson have
been silent.

Not since the 2004 re-election campaign of President George W. Bush has a
Republican presidential candidate earned as much as 40 percent of the
Hispanic vote. Mitt Romney got a dismal 27 percent in the 2012 contest
against President Barack Obama.

*Pataki’s Trump card: Using The Donald to get noticed in crowded GOP field
<http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/03/politics/george-pataki-donald-trump-strategy/index.html>
// CNN // Jeremy Diamond – July 3, 2015 *

George Pataki might have found a way to get noticed in the crowded GOP
field of presidential candidates: attack the highest-profile hopeful.

The former New York governor, who didn't even register 1% of support in the
latest CNN/ORC poll, is looking to raise his profile by attacking Trump's
controversial remarks about undocumented immigrants.

"We need a President that all Americans can respect, not a celebrity who
uses words like freedom and liberty like they are a punchline in a reality
show," Pataki said Friday in a statement that announced his petition that
urges Americans to "Stand up to Trump."

The petition comes after Pataki has spent the last two days seizing on
Trump's comments about Mexican immigrants, whom the real estate mogul and
now-GOP candidate has called everything from "rapists" to "killers."

Since announcing his interest in the presidential race, GOP strategists
have barely given Pataki's campaign a cursory look -- considering his
campaign among the longest of longshot bids -- and a son-in-law's stroke
caused Pataki to temporarily suspend his campaign in its infancy.

His Trump stunt is now giving his campaign a much-needed jolt of media
attention after he launched his campaign just over a month ago, but has
seen little to no national news coverage since. Until now.

It's certainly giving Pataki an opportunity to not only grab onto the
coattails of a presidential candidate who is surging in the polls, but it's
also giving Pataki a chance to distinguish himself from the rest of the
field.

Most Republican presidential candidates have either dismissed Trump as a
distraction or avoided getting tangled in a verbal sparring match with the
bombastic billionaire.

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, whose wife is Mexican, has simply said that
Trump is "wrong," while Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul chuckled that "I don't know
what he's been saying, but uh, he apparently is drawing a lot of
attention." And Sen. Ted Cruz, whose father is Cuban, has instead defended
Trump as "brash" and someone who "speaks the truth" and praised him for
drawing attention to illegal immigration.

Pataki has done the exact opposite: blasting Trump and calling on his
fellow White House hopefuls to do the same.

"Here we are in 2015 and a leading candidate for the GOP nomination for
President is calling Mexicans criminals, rapists and drug dealers. This is
unacceptable," Pataki said Wednesday in an open letter to the rest of the
Republican field.

Pataki's efforts were joined on Friday by Sen. Marco Rubio, a
Cuban-American who called Trump's remarks "offensive and inaccurate" as
well as "divisive."

"Our next President needs to be someone who brings Americans together --
not someone who continues to divide," Rubio said in a statement. "Our
broken immigration system is something that needs to be solved, and
comments like this move us further from -- not closer to -- a solution. We
need leaders who offer serious solutions to secure our border and fix our
broken immigration system."

But beyond drawing a response from other candidates, Pataki's efforts give
him a chance to insert himself into the constant coverage of Trump and the
fallout from his remarks, snagging interviews on CNN and with other
national news outlets that will help improve his name identification.

He even got some help from Trump on that front, with the Twitter-savvy
businessman who frequently uses the social media platform to lob attacks at
his detractors sticking to his usual script.

"Governor Pataki was a terrible governor of NY, one of the worst --
would've been swamped if he ran again!" Trump said. "Governor Pataki
couldn't be elected dog catcher if he ran again -- so he didn't!"

The move could also win Pataki some favor among the GOP establishment where
strategists and party elites are keenly aware of the need to draw Latinos
in, rather than turn them away, heading into the 2016 election.

Hot off heavy media coverage of the remarks and his campaign announcement
last month, Trump surged to second place in the nationwide CNN/ORC poll
released Wednesday. He is also ranked second in recent polls in both Iowa
and New Hampshire.

But Trump is also highly disliked among many GOP voters, with more than
half in several key polls saying they have an unfavorable opinion of the
New York mogul.

*Jon Stewart Slams Donald Trump Supporters For Defending ‘Mexican Rapists’
Comments
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/03/jon-stewart-donald-trump-mexican-rapists_n_7721686.html?utm_hp_ref=politics&ir=Politics>
// HuffPo // Julia Bruccullieri – July 3, 2015 *

Donald Trump has found himself in the center of controversy since he first
announced his bid for presidency, and Jon Stewart is having a field day.

On Thursday night's show, "The Daily Show" host told viewers he wanted to
thank one person "who’s been there really throughout this whole run, but
specially near the end of the run." That person was Trump.

“Donald recently glided back into my life on his solid gold up-and-down
people mover, cranked up the unauthorized Neil Young, opened up his crazy
hole, and promised me I would never be without material again,” Stewart
told his viewers.

The focus of Stewart's segment was a string of anti-immigrant remarks Trump
made during his presidential announcement speech. You may remember hearing
the Donald say: "They're sending people that have lots of problems, and
they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're
bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."

Like many of us, Stewart was baffled by these comments, but even more so by
the people who continued to defend them.

“The one good thing to come out of this is that the farce of his candidacy
is finally exposed: his un-seriousness on display, for all people and
voters to see! And the results will be obvious," said Stewart, before
showing that Trump is actually in second place among Republican voters in a
national poll in three states flashed on screen.

"F--k me," was all he could say.

*Bernie Sanders Will End the IMF’s Economic Violence in Greece and Africa
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/bernie-sanders-will-end-the-imfs-economic-violence-in-greece-and-africa_b_7723284.html>
// HuffPo // Robert Naiman – July 3, 2015 *

Many people want to know more about Democratic presidential candidate
Bernie Sanders' foreign policy agenda. Yes, they say, we like what Sanders
is saying about reducing extreme inequality, about reducing the political
power of the billionaire class. But what about U.S. foreign policy? Yes,
they say, Bernie voted no on the Iraq war; yes, they acknowledge, Sanders
supports the Iran deal. But we're spending more than half of our federal
income tax dollars on the Pentagon's empire, money we should be spending on
rebuilding our nation's domestic infrastructure. "A nation that continues
year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of
social uplift is approaching spiritual death," Dr. King said. What's Bernie
going to do about that?

I'm all for pushing Bernie to talk more about downsizing the Pentagon to be
an institution focused on actually defending the United States, as opposed
to running around the world overthrowing other people's governments -- a
Pentagon that "goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy," as
President John Quincy Adams put it.

But we should also take advantage of the new opportunity that now presents
itself; it's not only with bombs that U.S. foreign policy kills and injures
innocent civilians.

We should recognize and publicize the fact that Bernie Sanders is the only
presidential candidate who is talking about what the IMF is doing to
Greece, the only presidential candidate who has a track record of opposing
the IMF, the only presidential candidate who, if elected, is likely to do
anything to end the economic violence of the IMF.

In his historic campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination in
1988, Jesse Jackson often invoked the theme of "economic violence":

Economic violence is the critical issue of our day. When plants close on
workers without notice, and leave them without jobs or training for new
jobs -- that's economic violence. When three to five million Americans are
on the streets and homeless -- that's economic violence. When merger
maniacs make windfall profits and top management is given excessive
bonuses, golden parachutes to aid a soft landing, while workers are asked
to take a wage cut, a benefit cut and a job loss, a crash landing -- that's
economic violence. When our children are victimized with poor health care,
poor education, poor housing, poor diets and more -- that's economic
violence against our children.

Jesse Jackson was talking about U.S. domestic policy. But others have used
the idea to talk about the IMF:

Hundreds of campaigners are marching in Prague as the main policy-making
body of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) begins a meeting to discuss
debt relief.

They want the IMF and its sister organisation, the World Bank, to cancel
altogether debts owed to them by the poorest countries.

The protesters are staging a "funeral" procession through Czech capital to
highlight their view that 7 million children a year die because of the debt
crisis.

Jubliee 2000, which is organising the march, says it will be totally
non-violent and that it is committed to peaceful protest.

"We condemn violence, both the violence which ends in broken windows, and
the violence that kills 19,000 children a day," the group's UK director Ann
Pettifor told the BBC.

The IMF is not "over there." The IMF is headquartered in Washington,
physically, politically and financially. A progressive economist once
reported that he was at a seminar at the IMF, where a senior IMF official
was indignant that people were saying that IMF is unaccountable. The IMF
official demanded to know: why do people always accuse us of being
unaccountable? We never do anything without checking with the U.S. Treasury
Department!

Until now, unfortunately, Congressional Democrats have been largely content
to let Treasury to run the show at the IMF without the input of real
Democrats.

The IMF is now doing to Greece what the IMF has been doing to Africa since
the 1980s and what the IMF did to South America until the progressive
governments there kicked the IMF out. The IMF is a member of the "troika"
of official creditors that have been making extreme austerity demands on
the Greek government and are now openly demanding "regime change" in Greece
before there can be any deal that ends the crisis in Greece that the troika
has imposed.

(Some people complain that we shouldn't blame the IMF for what is being
done to Greece; they say that some other institution or actor is more
responsible. These people want us to play "accountability whack-a-mole"
with the institutions. We need to hold the institutions "jointly and
severally liable"; and the IMF is the bad actor in the troika for whom
Americans have the most responsibility.)

Bernie Sanders is the only presidential candidate who is speaking out about
this. In Congress, it's the progressive Democrats - including Sanders - who
are speaking out about this.

U.S. support for the IMF is more politically fragile than many people
realize. Many Congressional Republicans hate the IMF, in significant
measure because they see the IMF as a Democrat-supported taxpayer-financed
slush fund to bail out big private banks when their international bets go
bad (which assessment is quite correct.) Without the support of
Congressional Democrats, the IMF is dead meat in Washington. Whenever the
IMF wants more money from Washington, there's a campaign to trick
low-information Democrats into believing that the IMF is "foreign aid," so
that Democrats will support it.

When more Democrats own the fact that the IMF agenda is the NAFTA-WTO-TPP
agenda with a European internationalist smiley face mask pasted on, the IMF
will be on a fast train to the dustbin of history. And this is not
necessarily a remote prospect - the fact that this is the fundamental
identity of the IMF is well known among labor activists, for example.

AFL-CIO chief economist William Spriggs recently wrote:

In the U.S. we must take the side of Greece in this fight. It is in our
interest, as the immediate problem of the instability this is causing is a
rising dollar that will hurt U.S. exports and jobs. And, we can never be
sure of the interrelated nature of financial collapses since so much of the
banking sector remains in the shadows; with global derivatives trading at
values greater than global output.

More importantly, we must also revolt against this economic order. It is
the same order that saved JP Morgan Chase, but let Detroit and now Puerto
Rico fail. It is the same religion that would sacrifice the earnings of
American students with rising student debt and de-invest in public higher
education. It is the same religion that would sacrifice American jobs and
labor standards and back the Trans-Pacific Partnership. We must see these
as the same struggle to restore sanity and purpose to role of government
and its servant, the economy.

This is why supporters of the IMF should be very afraid that Bernie Sanders
and progressive Democrats are denouncing what the IMF is doing to Greece.
You can add your voice here.

*Donald Trump again lambastes border security after a California woman is
killed
<http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-na-donald-trump-kathryn-steinle-20150703-htmlstory.html>
// LA Times // Ryan Parker – July 3, 2015 *

Real estate mogul and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, who
has come under fire for referring to some Mexican immigrants as "rapists"
and "killers," again blasted border security in the wake of the slaying of
a California woman and the news that the suspect was deported five times.

Trump did not directly refer to the comments that have cost him valuable
business sponsorships and prompted denunciations from Latino groups.
Instead, he focused on border security.

Other GOP contenders, after largely sidestepping the issue, are now
blasting Trump's immigration remarks, with Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida the
latest to do so.

In a series of tweets Friday, Trump said the shooting death of 32-year-old
Kathryn Steinle at a popular tourist spot in San Francisco was
unacceptable. "Our Southern border is unsecure," he said in a tweet. "I am
the only one that can fix it, nobody else has the guts to even talk about
it." Francisco Sanchez, 45, was arrested on suspicion of murder. Sanchez
has seven felony convictions.

Trump has stood by his "rapists" and "killers" comments, but made no direct
mention of Mexican immigrants in Friday's tweets.

Fellow Republican candidates this week said that Trump has gone too far.

"His views are not reflective of the immigrant experience. He’s just
wrong," former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush told the The Daily Caller.

Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry, in an interview on Fox News, called Trump's
comments a "huge error" that "painted with a very broad brush."

"I don't think he's reflecting the Republican Party," Perry said.

Rubio released a statement, posted Friday by CNN's Jake Tapper, condemning
Trump's comments, calling them " offensive and inaccurate, but also
divisive."

"Our broken immigration system is something that needs to be solved, and
comments like this move us further from -- not closer to -- a solution,"
according to the statement.

Still, Trump does have support from at least one other GOP candidate, Sen.
Ted Cruz of Texas, who defended Trump to Chuck Todd in an interview on
NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“I salute Donald Trump for focusing on the need to address illegal
immigration,” Cruz said. "The Washington cartel doesn't want to address
that."

Several companies -- including Univision, NBC and Macy’s -- have severed
ties with Trump because of those comments. Trump filed a $500-million
lawsuit against Univision alleging breach of contract.

However, his stance on immigrants living in the country illegally does not
seem to be hurting him in recent national polls, which have him in second
place among Republicans.

*Donald Trump: Whose voters is he stealing
<http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2015/0703/Donald-Trump-Whose-voters-is-he-stealing>
// CS Monitor // Peter Grier – July 3, 2015 *

Right now, Donald Trump is like a black hole whose stupendous gravitational
pull is attracting a lot of media attention and some of the voters
associated with the Republican 2016 presidential race. Which of his rivals
in particular is this hurting?

After all, Mr. Trump’s poll numbers have risen sharply since he said that
this time, he’s actually, positively running. Polling is a zero-sum game:
His rise means other folks have fallen. Let’s look at the numbers and see
which of Trump’s fellow candidates they are.

First, two caveats: Our Trump track record is not good. We thought he’d
move to Maine and raise beets before he’d run for president. We belittled
reporters who implied otherwise. We were wrong.

Also, the polls we’re about to pick apart are early ones, so they’re far
from definitive. At this point, they’re more of a general suggestion than a
precise measurement. That goes even more so for the poll cross-tabs, which
have a smaller sample size. Still, they could be hints of what’s to come.

OK, back to the main feature. As we said, Trump’s gotten a
post-announcement bump in polling popularity. In the crucial early caucus
state of Iowa, for instance, he’s risen to a tie for second place. He
currently attracts 10 percent of likely Iowa Republican caucus-goers,
according to a Quinnipiac University survey. Retired neurosurgeon Ben
Carson also gets 10 percent. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker leads the Iowa
pack with 18 percent.

The bottom line? In a look further down the list, the contender who appears
to be losing ground in Iowa is Mike Huckabee. He’s at only 5 percent in the
new Quinnipiac poll, down from 11 percent in a comparable May survey. That
sort of makes sense: Mr. Huckabee’s God, grits, and gravy populism isn’t
that far off Trump’s anti-immigrant and bellicose positions.

But Governor Walker’s dropped a bit in this poll series as well. And if you
move to New Hampshire, state of the first-in-the-nation primary, it appears
that Trump’s entry into the race has pushed the Wisconsin governor down a
Franconia-sized notch.

In New Hampshire, Trump’s in second, according to a recent Suffolk
University poll, with 11 percent. Jeb Bush leads in the Granite State with
14 percent. Walker trails with 8 percent – a substantial drop from March,
when Suffolk had him at 14 percent of the GOP primary vote.

Nationally, Trump’s jump into the fray has affected Marco Rubio the most,
according to a CNN/ORC poll. Senator Rubio now stands at 6 percent in CNN’s
most recent numbers, down from 14 percent in May.

Walker’s also slipping nationally, according to CNN. He’s at 6 percent,
down from 10 percent in May.

Trump? He’s in second place (again), with 12 percent of the vote, up from 3
percent in March, according to CNN’s numbers.

See the pattern here? There’s one top contender who’s largely unaffected by
Trump’s escalator ride to candidacy – Mr. Bush. He remains the weak
front-runner, but now he’s got Trump behind him like a screen. The Donald
is holding his arms out and bellowing to keep others from catching up.

The question is whether Trump’s newfound numbers will hold up. In 2012, a
series of Mitt Romney’s rivals rose and fell. They were discovered by
voters, then received more intense press scrutiny (Herman Cain’s alleged
sexual harassment problem comes to mind) and fell to earth.

As an actual candidate, Trump’s now getting a taste of what more-critical
media are like. The uproar over his harsh remarks about Mexican illegal
immigration may be just the start. His rambling announcement speech could
provide fodder for more such flaps to come.

*UNDECLARED*

*WALKER*

*In Scott Walker’s Wisconsin, Obama urges Crowd to Flee to Democrat-Run
paradise In Minnesota
<http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/07/03/obama_to_wisconsin_crowd_democrat_led_minnesota_has_higher_income_and_lower.html>
// Slate // Beth Ethier – July 3, 2015 *

President Obama took advantage of a stop in La Crosse, Wisconsin on
Thursday to get in on the fun of the 2016 presidential derby, telling an
enthusiastic university crowd he's lost track of how many Republicans are
running but that it's probably enough for "an actual Hunger Games. That is
an interesting bunch."

Obama also stoked a regional rivalry while questioning the economic
credentials and policy agenda of the "bus full" of contenders for the
Republican presidential nominaton, particularly the state's conservative
governor and as-yet undeclared candidate, Scott Walker.

We've seen what happens when top-down economics meets the real world. We've
got proof right here in Wisconsin. There was a statewide fair-pay law that
was repealed. The right to organize and bargain collectively was attacked.
Per-student education funding was cut. Your minimum wage has been stuck in
place. Meanwhile, corporations and the most fortunate few have been on the
receiving end of hundreds of millions of dollars in new tax cuts over the
past four years...

What happens when we try middle-class economics? Just across the river,
it's a pretty interesting experiment. In Minnesota, they asked the top two
percent to pay a little bit more. They invested in things that help
everybody succeed, like all-day kindergarten and financial aid for college
students. They took action to raise their minium wage and they passed an
equal pay law. They protected workers' rights. They expanded Medicaid to
cover more people.

Now, according to Republican theory, all those steps would've been bad for
the economy, but Minnesota's unemployment rate is lower than Wisconsin's.
Minnesota's median income is around $9,000 higher.

Obama went on to quote an editorial in their hometown paper, the La Crosse
Tribune, declaring that Minnesota "is winning this border battle." The
divergence in economic fortunes of the two states has been noted for the
past few years, as Democratic majorities in both chambers of Minnesota's
legislature have steadily implemented progressive reforms in cooperation
with a Democratic governor.

Republicans, Obama said, are like your "Uncle Harry" who says outlandish
things at Thanksgiving. "You say, 'Uncle Harry, that makes no sense at
all.' You still love him. He's still a member of your family, right? But
you've got to correct him. You don't want to put him in charge of stuff."

The president hastily added that "if there's an Uncle Harry out here, I
wasn't talking about you."

*New York Times Debunked: Scott Walker’s ‘I’m Not Going Nativist’
Conversation Never Happened
<http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/03/exclusive-ny-times-hit-on-scott-walker-dead-wrong-as-walkers-donor-class-meetings-raise-questions/>
// Breitbart // Matthew Boyle – July 3, 2015*

A conversation about immigration between Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and
the Heritage Foundation’s Stephen Moore, reported on by the New York Times
this week, never happened.

“We have spoken with Stephen Moore and the conversation that was reported
did not happen and he will tell you that. I would recommend you reach out
to him,” Walker spokeswoman AshLee Strong told Breitbart News on Thursday
in response to an article by Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman.

On Thursday, the reporters wrote: “Stephen Moore, a conservative scholar at
the Heritage Foundation who backs an immigration overhaul, called Mr.
Walker’s embrace of a border-security-first approach ‘A lurch to the right
and probably something very popular among Iowa conservative voters.’”

“But Mr. Moore also said he was not convinced that Mr. Walker was quite the
immigration hawk as he may appear now,” the Times added. “Rather, he called
the governor’s positioning ‘a work in progress.’”

Then the newspaper wrote: “Mr. Moore said he had become concerned about Mr.
Walker’s stance [on immigration] in recent weeks, but was reassured after a
phone call with the Wisconsin governor,” then quoted Moore himself
recounting what Walker supposedly said.

“He said, ‘I’m not going nativist; I’m pro-immigration,’” Moore said Gov.
Walker said.

But Walker’s presidential campaign insists that conversation never
happened, so Breitbart News reached out to Moore for more information.

Moore confirms that there was no phone call between him and Walker. What
actually happened, he says, is a bit more murky and confusing—much
different from what the Times says happened.

“Here’s what happened, I’m on this group with Larry Kudlow and Art Laffer
called the Committee to Unleash Prosperity,” Moore told Breitbart News.

We had Scott Walker a few months ago for a dinner. So here’s the
miscommunication: I didn’t have the conversation with the governor. Larry
went down there. We’ve got this group, and Larry had a conversation with
Scott Walker on immigration stuff—and what he told me because we all work
together is that Scott Walker is still pro-growth. Our whole thing is on
growth. We don’t have to worry about him voting for skilled immigrants
coming into the country and that kind of thing. I think the whole thing has
been kind of taken out of context. From our point of view, Scott Walker is
going to be pro-growth on immigration.

But Kudlow, in a phone interview on Friday evening with Breitbart News,
said that’s not what happened, either.

“I spoke with Governor Walker, I don’t know, it must have been a month
ago,” Kudlow said.

It was in Madison, Wisconsin, as his request. We had a long meeting—several
hours—and we discussed several issues across the board. It was a strictly
private meeting, the details of which I’ve shared with no one. No one. I
want to be very clear about that. It was between the governor and myself.
No one. Not Steve Moore. Not the New York Times. Nobody. It was a private
conversation and off the record.

But there was no phone call between Moore and Walker about this
matter—despite the Times report—Moore confirmed. Moore told Breitbart News:

No, no that didn’t happen. I did not have a conversation with Walker. It
was my mistake. I kind of miscommunicated this to this reporter. What I
really meant to say is that Larry did. And when Larry had the conversation,
we felt that he was going to be just fine and not going to be a problem on
immigration. Everybody is kind of making a mountain out of a mole hill
here. It was basically just—our objective at the Committee to Unleash
Prosperity is to promote policies that will make the American economy grow
faster. That’s all we’re about and so that’s all we really talked to the
governor about, was what are the policies that make the economy grow
faster? And Walker was at the dinner meeting and also at the thing with
Larry solid. I’m a big supporter of his.

“I have to talk to the reporter—I have to call him today and say, ‘Look I
think you misunderstood what I was saying,’” Moore added. “What I was
talking about was based on this meeting that Larry had.”

What really happened, according to Moore, was that Walker had a meeting
with Kudlow, not with Moore.

“I was talking to Larry and he reported back to us because I asked, ‘Well
how did the meeting go?’ and he said ‘We talked a lot about a lot of
issues,’” Moore told Breitbart News. “This was right about the time this
immigration issue had sprung up, and Larry was like ‘Oh, he’s going to be
with us on immigration.’”

Kudlow told Breitbart News, however, that he told Moore no such things from
his conversation with Walker.

“No. That is just not true,” Kudlow said when Breitbart News read Moore’s
quote back to him over the phone.

The only thing I might have said to Steve and Art is that I talked to the
governor about a lot of issues. I made no definitive statements on taxes,
immigration, trade, nothing. Look this was a private meeting. A guy asks
you in and it was a private off the record meeting, you keep it private and
off the record. The only thing I can confirm is that I probably said to
Steve we talked about a lot of issues. Nothing more.

When asked if Walker said in the conversation with Kudlow—the quote Moore
told the New York Times,“I’m not going nativist, I’m pro-immigration”—
Moore told Breitbart News he’s unsure.

“I don’t know. I wasn’t at that meeting, so I don’t know exactly what he
said. I’m sort of saying what Larry Kudlow told me about the meeting,”
Moore said.

Kudlow told Breitbart News he will not reveal publicly here–just as he says
he has not to anyone else–the details of the conversation with Walker.

“I haven’t done it with anybody and I’m not going to start now,” Kudlow
said.

Scott Walker is a friend. I don’t know what Steve was thinking or where he
was going with that. But that’s you know—there’s no there there. I can
report nothing to you. I’m always helpful to Breitbart. I love Breitbart.
In fact, I was one of the first people to put [Andrew] Breitbart on TV many
years ago. I help you guys whenever I can. But this is all I can say to
you. There’s nothing more there.

This matters, because the biggest and most significant thing Walker has
done on his lead up to launching his campaign has been rethinking his
position on immigration.

He joined the last two winners of the Iowa Republican caucuses—former
Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee,
both of whom are running again now—by tapping into strong economic populism
that has faded from the Republican Party under the leadership of people
like Ryan and his fellow failure and 2012 top-of-the-ticket running mate
Mitt Romney. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)80%

and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush have also been pushing the party away from
the voter base toward the donor class, and Walker has been somewhat caught
in the crossfire between the two different camps. At different times on
different issues, he’s shown a propensity to side with either or both.

Moore himself has written in favor of looser immigration laws.

“Republicans and conservatives might want to coalesce around a position of
tight welfare and generous immigration rules,” Moore, a member of the Wall
Street Journal’s editorial board, wrote in the Journal in 2013. “That is
something Milton Friedman would no doubt regard as the ideal outcome. As
another late great economist—William Niskanen, a member of President
Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisers and chairman of the Cato
Institute—once put it: ‘Better to build a wall around the welfare state
than the country.’”

Despite the fact that he admits not having had a conversation with Walker,
Moore insists the governor isn’t simply saying one thing to one side and
the public and another to the other behind closed doors.

“I think that’s what he [the Times reporter] was trying to imply—that he’s
saying one thing to me, and another thing to other conservative groups,”
Moore tells Breitbart News. “I don’t think that’s a fair characterization
at all.”

It would certainly help if Walker was more forthcoming—and his team was
clearer in answering the questions that come their way—but they’re not. The
Times didn’t respond to a request for comment for this story.

*OTHER*

*Chris Christie and Marco Rubio Get Pajama Time at Matt Romney’s House
<http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/03/chris-christies-pajama-time-at-mitt-romneys-house/>
// NYT // Ashley Parker and Maggie Haberman – July 3, 2015 *

Mitt Romney is having a slumber party this weekend at his New Hampshire
compound with some very interesting guests: Gov. Chris Christie of New
Jersey and Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, along with their families.

The sleepover party Friday night at Mr. Romney’s summer vacation spot in
Wolfeboro, N.H., came about when the 2012 Republican presidential nominee
realized that the two current hopefuls would be campaigning in the area
during the holiday weekend.

“Governor Romney heard that his friends, Governor Christie and Senator
Rubio, along with their families, would be in Wolfeboro over the July 4th
holiday weekend,” an aide to Mr. Romney said. “He and Mrs. Romney opened
their home to their friends and look forward to celebrating America’s
birthday.”

Mr. Romney, who almost jumped into the 2016 presidential race for his third
try at the White House, remains a coveted surrogate for Republicans and a
person whose approval carries weight with donors.

The visit by Mr. Christie, first reported by The Washington Post, comes
days after he announced his presidential run and as he is trying to shake
off a difficult six months in which his poll numbers have fallen. Mr.
Christie is struggling to keep donors by his side after Jeb Bush‘s entrance
into the race and after lingering fallout from the scandal over the George
Washington Bridge lane closings.

Aides to both Mr. Romney and Mr. Christie have never completely gotten over
a rift in the 2012 race, when Mr. Christie, despite being a key supporter,
declined to campaign with Mr. Romney in the final week of the campaign
after Hurricane Sandy ravaged his state. Instead, the governor warmly
embraced President Obama as the two toured the ravaged New Jersey coast
together.

Both moves infuriated Mr. Romney’s aides. But the two men have remained in
touch, and this weekend Mr. Christie is bringing along his wife, Mary Pat,
and two sons.

Mr. Rubio, for his part, has been making efforts to court Mr. Romney’s
financial support and also some of his advisers. A former top campaign aide
to Mr. Romney, Rich Beeson, is deputy campaign manager for Mr. Rubio, and
Wayne Berman, a Republican bundler, joined Mr. Rubio’s team early. And
Terry Sullivan, Mr. Rubio’s campaign manager, also worked for Mr. Romney’s
2008 presidential bid.

At a campaign stop in Tilton, N.H., Mr. Christie said it was too early to
ask for Mr. Romney’s endorsement.

“I was the first governor to endorse Gov. Romney in 2011, and I endorsed
him in October,” he said. “So it’d probably be bad form for me to ask him
to do it any time earlier than that.”

“We’ll talk whatever our host wants to talk about,” Mr. Christie said of
his planned evening with Mr. Romney. “You know me, I’m kind of the shy and
retiring type, I’ll sit back and let the conversation come to me.”

Campaign aides to another candidate who is in New Hampshire this holiday
weekend, former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida, were not aware of any plans for
him to meet with Mr. Romney. The two men met privately in Utah in January,
when Mr. Romney was still considering entering the race.

*Romney to host the Christies, Rubios at the New Hampshire home
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/03/romney-to-host-the-christies-at-his-new-hampshire-home/>
// WaPo // Philip Rucker – July 3, 2015 *

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's comeback journey begins here in New
Hampshire, so the Republican presidential candidate is paying a visit to
the last winner of the state's first-in-the-nation primary and one of its
most famous summertime residents.

Mitt Romney is hosting Christie and his wife, Mary Pat, at his waterfront
compound on picturesque Lake Winnipesaukee on Friday night, people familiar
with the plans said.

During the summer, Romney's sprawling Wolfeboro retreat — which includes a
private beach, tennis court and trails — is a playground for the 2012 GOP
nominee's huge family.

On Friday night, though, Romney will have the Christies as overnight
guests. But they won't be the only non-family members in the house. Fellow
GOP hopeful Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida and his wife, Jeanette, are also
joining the Romneys for Friday night's slumber party.

"Governor Romney heard that his friends, Governor Christie and Senator
Rubio, along with their families, would be in Wolfeboro over the July 4th
holiday weekend. He and Mrs. Romney opened their home to their friends and
look forward to celebrating America’s birthday," said an aide to Romney,
who spoke only on the condition of anonymity.

On Saturday morning, the Christies and Rubios will also be marching  in
Wolfeboro's celebrated Fourth of July parade. One of the state's more
colorful parades, Wolfeboro's includes such quirks as a lawn chair brigade.
The Romneys are known to be annual presences along the parade route.

*Rubio, Christie planning sleepover with the Romneys
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/57c1ebce66324362b82c0eba91cbe35e/rubio-christie-planning-sleepover-romneys>
// AP // Jill Colvin – July 3, 2015 *

2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney will be hosting two rival Republican
presidential contenders at a holiday sleepover Friday evening.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio will both be
staying over at Romney's property in Wolfeboro, New Hampshire, an aide to
Romney confirmed.

The aide, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of what the aide
called the private nature of the event, said the former governor and his
wife opened their home to the Christie and Rubio families after hearing
they would be in town for the holiday weekend. Both candidates are
scheduled to march in Wolfeboro's Fourth of July parade.

Christie, who formally jumped into the race this week, told reporters in
New Hampshire Friday that he was grateful for the invitation.

"I suspect there might be a little politics discussed tonight with Mitt and
Ann, but me and Mary Pat, and Andrew and Sarah are really happy that Mitt
and Ann invited us to stay with them tonight," he said, according to video
posted by NJ.com.

A Rubio spokesman declined to comment.

Romney had considered another run for president in 2016, but announced in
January that he'd decided against it. His endorsement is now coveted.

Christie was a top surrogate for Romney's 2012 campaign and was considered
a potential vice presidential contender. But he continues to receive heat
in some Republican circles for leaving the trail and embracing President
Barack Obama after New Jersey was hit by Superstorm Sandy just before the
election.

Christie's campaign also announced some of its top staffers Friday.

The campaign will be managed by Ken McKay, who formerly worked for the
Republican National Committee and Republican Governors Association.

*Romney to host Christie, Rubio in New Hampshire
<http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/mitt-romney-hosts-chris-christie-new-hampshire-119718.html?ml=tl_10>
// Politico // Jennifer Shutt – July 3, 2015 *

Mitt Romney is opening up his sprawling New Hampshire vacation home to 2016
rivals Marco Rubio and Chris Christie this weekend.

Christie and his wife Pat are planning to have dinner with the former GOP
presidential candidate on Friday night at his home near Lake Winnipesaukee
and spend the night, according to a report in The Washington Post. On
Saturday they plan to walk in the town’s Fourth of July parade, which is a
tradition for the Romney family.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who is also running for the GOP 2016 presidential
nomination, is expected to walk in the parade as well and will stay at the
former Massachusetts governor’s home, according to Time.

Romney won the 2012 Republican primary in New Hampshire with 39 percent of
the vote, but received 46 percent in the general election and lost the
state’s electoral college votes to Obama.

*Rubio, Christie To Bunk At Mitt Romney’s New Hampshire B&B
<http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-03/mitt-romney-s-new-hampshire-b-b>
// Bloomberg // Terrence Dopp – July 3, 2015 *

This may be the political junkie's sleepover of the year: Two rival
candidates for the Republican presidential nomination will be bunking
tonight with Mitt Romney at his vacation home in Wolfeboro, New Hampshire.

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and Florida Senator Marco Rubio will be
the guests of Romney, the Republican party's 2012 nominee. Both candidates
are scheduled to march in Wolfeboro's July Fourth parade.

Speaking to reporters today in Derry, New Hampshire, Christie told
reporters that he, his wife, Mary Pat Christie, and two of the couple's
children, will be guests of Romney and his wife, Ann. A source close to
Romney confirmed that Rubio will also be an overnight guest.

The vacation home of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Lake
Winnipesaukee in Wolfeboro.

The Romneys own a $10 million vacation home in Wolfeboro. The meeting at a
home near New Hampshire's Lake Winnipisaukee will reunite two politicians
with considerable professional and personal history in Romney and Christie,
and one who is a newer acquaintance.

In 2009, Romney was an early supporter of Christie in his race for governor.

Three years later, Christie returned the favor, vigorously backing Romney
in his unsuccessful challenge to President Barack Obama.

Romney opted not to make a 2016 run despite early indications he flirted
with the notion. Nevertheless, he's remained an in-demand Republican
surrogate and fundraiser, and his support is coveted by many in a field
that swelled to 14 people Tuesday when Christie jumped in.

In an interview with Bloomberg's Mark Halperin last month, Romney named six
Republican candidates whom he could support, and spoke warmly of both Rubio
and Christie.

"I like Marco," Romney told Halperin, quickly adding that he liked a number
of the Republican contenders. "I'm fiercely neutral in this process he
quipped."

Of Christie, Romney said: "I've spent a lot of time with him and feel very
close to him." And he offered his friend words of encouragement.

"Some people count him out, but not me," Romney said, referring to
Christie's drop in the polls following a spate of negative publicity over
his state's budget problems and his advisers' politically-motivated
decision to manufacture a traffic jam outside a Democratic-controlled town.

"We like the comeback story," Romney added.

On a Derry sidewalk outside MaryAnn's diner, where he had been greeting
breakfast patrons, Christie declined to say what he's expecting to the
discussion topics to be. "Whatever he wants to talk about," Christie, 52,
told reporters of his host. "I'm confident there will be some politics
discussed tonight, but there will be lots of other things talked about too."

*Romney to Host Rubio, Christie for July 4th
<http://time.com/3945663/2016-election-marco-rubio-chris-christie-mitt-romney/>
// TIME // Zeke J. Miller – July 3, 2015 *

Former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney is hosting two of his
would-be successors Friday night at his home for the July 4th holiday.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio are marching in
the Wolfeboro, N.H. Fourth of July parade—the largest in the state—on
Saturday morning, just blocks from the Romney family vacation home in the
bucolic lakeside town.

“Governor Romney heard that his friends, Governor Christie and Senator
Rubio, along with their families, would be in Wolfeboro over the July 4th
holiday weekend,” a Romney spokesperson said. “He and Mrs. Romney opened
their home to their friends and look forward to celebrating America’s
birthday.”

Both Christie and Rubio attended Romney’s E2 Summit in Park City, Utah last
month and are hoping to win over his supporters and donors in the
first-in-the-nation primary state. Romney told reporters at the summit that
he intends to remain neutral through the primaries.

South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and former
Texas Gov. Rick Perry are also participating in New Hampshire July 4th
festivities on Saturday, but will be staying elsewhere.

*OTHER 2016 NEWS*

*The unexpected rise of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-socialist-and-the-donald/2015/07/03/da2063e4-2114-11e5-84d5-eb37ee8eaa61_story.html>
// WaPo // Kathleen Parker – July 3, 2015 *

Stranger things have happened in American politics, but the sudden surge of
Democratic/populist Bernie Sanders and Republican/pompulist Donald Trump
puts one in mind of alternate universes.

And I don’t mean Miss Universes.

Both men are holding second place in some polls behind Hillary Clinton and
Jeb Bush, respectively. And both are steadily ascending in the polls at a
greater pace than anyone could have predicted — or imagined.

Sanders, a socialist running on a platform that should send shivers up the
spines of most Americans, drew his largest crowd of the season — nearly
10,000 — in Madison, Wis., last Wednesday night. The anti-establishment
candidate, who wants to break up big banks and redistribute wealth, makes
President Obama (and Clinton) look like robber barons by comparison.

Although Madison is a liberal college town and Sanders’s record crowd could
be rationalized accordingly, poll after poll shows him closing the gap with
Clinton. A Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday morning put him
within 19 points of Clinton among likely Democratic caucus-goers in Iowa.
Quinnipiac surveyed 761 likely Iowa Democratic caucus participants, with
humans calling cell and land phones, and with a margin of error of 3.6
percentage points.

Meanwhile, A WMUR/CNN Granite State poll put Sanders just 8 points below
Clinton in New Hampshire.

As Sanders remarked in Madison upon seeing the throng that greeted him,
“Whoa.”

At the same time Sanders is on the zoom rail, mysterious things are
happening around the candidacy of the Trumpster. Some of you may recognize
him as the cartoon character eternally lost in a game of Monopoly, sort of
the way Beetlejuice was confined to a miniature graveyard in the movie of
the same name. (No matter what happens, do not say “Trump!” thrice in a
row.)

He is otherwise known for: the buildings he has named after himself; a
couple of TV shows he has hosted, the names of which escape me now; his
hair, which he recently averred is his own; his vast fortune, about which
he can’t stop bragging — and a proportionately small mouth for someone
famous for having such a big one.

To wit: His recent comments about Mexican immigrants as rapists, drug
runners and criminals. And, he added, “some, I assume, are good people.”

Why, there’s a good one right over there — mowing Trump’s Palm Beach
Mar-a-Lago estate lawn. “Hola, Paco, que tal? ”

Trump’s insulting tirade has had the dual effect of getting him fired from
NBCUniversal, Univision and Macy’s (and counting) for comments unbecoming
an icon and getting him feted as the Iconoclast that Republicans have been
waiting for. If you’re a member of the Republican base, a candidate can’t
be too anti-immigration, too anti-Common Core — or too rich, apparently.

Even as Trump’s various enterprises are vanishing — and support among, I
dunno, let’s call them “sane Americans” is waning — he has doubled down on
comments that could as easily have been retracted with an apology. Here’s a
sample for future reference: “ Of course, I didn’t mean that all Mexicans
are rapists. I was upset by some of the statistics I’ve read and just
mouthed off without more carefully considering the full impact my words
could have on others. I’m sorry.” (Warning: Do not add: Some of my best
friends are Mexican.)

But no. Instead, commenting on a 2014 Fusion article about Latin American
women being raped as they traveled to the United States across Mexico,
“Well, somebody’s doing the raping, Don!” he retorted when CNN anchor Don
Lemon gave him a chance to think things through. “I mean, somebody’s doing
it!” Trump said. “Who’s doing the raping? Who’s doing the raping?”

Trump has a point there. Someone is doing the raping, assuming the Fusion
story is true. And the same Fusion story that claimed that 80 percent of
Central American women and girls are raped as they cross through Mexico to
the United States also answered Trump’s question: “Perpetrators can be
coyotes, other migrants, bandits, or even government authorities.”

Hmmm, so not necessarily those who then funnel into North America?

See? Logic isn’t so hard, but rant over reason is so much more effective in
attracting attention.

Trump’s fans say they like his blunt talk, that he says what they’re
thinking. He’s BOLD! Indeed. But bold and blunt wear thin after a while.

And the United States, though keen to hear fresh voices and ideas, isn’t
ready for either a Robin Hood or a King John in the White House.

Enjoy the show, everybody. But rest assured: This too — and these two —
shall pass.

*What candidates really mean when they invoke the ‘Founding Fathers’
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/what-candidates-really-mean-by-founding-fathers/2015/07/03/7b0444f4-1e9c-11e5-aeb9-a411a84c9d55_story.html>
// WaPo // Andrew M. Shocket – July 3, 2015 *

There’s nothing more American than Fourth of July cookouts, fireworks — and
political speeches, especially as we enter another presidential campaign
season. For politicians, nothing suits the holiday better than invocations
of our nation’s Founders. Not all such exclamations are cut from the same
red-white-and-blue cloth, however. Pay close attention as the candidates
praise the “Spirit of ’76,” and you’ll see that they’re not taking a break
from partisan rhetoric, but engaging in politics at its most elemental
level. Here’s a guide to some founding-related phrases and what they really
mean today.

“Founding Fathers”

Nothing says “I’m a conservative” more than this phrase. That’s because it
evokes an image of rich white guys who didn’t like taxes (until they had to
wage a war, in which case they raised them to levels unimagined under
British rule, but that’s another story). Warren G. Harding coined the term,
and since 2000, it has been used almost exclusively by Republicans. The
more conservative the candidate, the more likely you’ll hear it. Rand Paul,
George Pataki, Scott Walker, Mike Huckabee, Ted Cruz, Rick Santorum and
Rick Perry have all flogged the Founding Fathers. But don’t expect to hear
this from Hillary Clinton: She uses “Founders” instead.

“A more perfect union”

This is the liberal response to “Founding Fathers.” From the Constitution’s
preamble, the phrase originally expressed the hope that the Constitution
would be an improvement over its predecessor, the Articles of
Confederation. Today, liberals use it to imply that the nation and perhaps
even the Constitution weren’t immaculately conceived and stand in need of
reform. You’ll encounter it especially when politicians want to take on
large issues such as race or the increasingly prominent role of big money
in politics. Expect to hear this from Clinton and especially openly liberal
presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, who has used it before to celebrate
Independence Day.

“Created equal”

A phrase from the Declaration of Independence, which asserts “that all men
are created equal” and “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
rights,” including “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” This may
be a big one this year as candidates take on economic inequality, racial
inequality or both. Democratic candidate Martin O’Malley used the phrase
when announcing his candidacy, perhaps to help place himself to Clinton’s
left.

“A [fill in the blank] Bill of Rights”

When candidates want to drape stars and stripes over a plan to address an
issue and make some innovation look as though it should be permanent, this
is how they do it. The “Bill of Rights” refers to the first 10 amendments
to the Constitution, of course, including cornerstones of American civic
life such as freedom of speech, worship, assembly; the right to bear arms;
the right to a jury trial; and protection against unreasonable searches and
seizures. In recent elections, candidates have proposed a credit card bill
of rights, a privacy bill of rights, veterans’ bills of rights (including
one in 2008 courtesy of current Republican hopeful Huckabee), a military
family bill of rights, a crime victims’ bill of rights, and even worker and
shareholder bill of rights. One that probably won’t come up now that
Obamacare has fundamentally altered the debate over health care: a
“patients’ bill of rights,” versions of which were backed by numerous
presidential candidates from 2000 to 2008.

“Our sacred Honor

The Declaration of Independence closes with its signers pledging “our
Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor,” no small matter given that, had
the Revolution failed, they all likely would have been executed for
treason. “Honor” resonates more with men than with women, and more with
conservatives than liberals, and the “sacred” part catches the ear of
evangelical voters. Today the phrase gets used to imply that liberal
officeholders are staining the nation’s reputation. It was often brought up
in the 1990s by Republicans angry about Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica
Lewinsky; don’t be surprised to hear it this year from Republicans
attacking Hillary Clinton over Benghazi. Cruz spoke this phrase when he
announced his 2016 candidacy.

Of course, many Americans will be treated to an entire reading of the
Declaration of Independence instead of a candidate’s speech. But if so,
don’t despair: This guide won’t expire, and you’ll have 493 days to consult
it during the 2016 presidential election campaign

*Drawing voters in: Campaign logos bring artistic touch to politics
<http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/03/politics/2016-logos/index.html> // CNN //
Ashley Killough – July 3, 2015 *

Scott Walker released a part of his logo Thursday night, with plans to
unveil the full brand, piece by piece, over the next nine days until his
expected presidential announcement on July 13.

The black and white image shows what looks to be a stage with the
superimposed letters "CA" creeping in from the left. Such a partial glimpse
is an uncommon rollout for a campaign logo, designed to build gleeful
anticipation for his big kickoff and likely one of the final presidential
announcements of the year.

Walker's suspenseful logo launch underscores the power and visual impact
that symbols can have in defining a campaign. Along with a candidate's
face, logos become the most recognizable visuals for a campaign. They aim
to capture the candidate's message and personality in a brand that's
versatile enough to fit on a range of paraphernalia and advertising.

"Ultimately, the logo's job is to build remembrance," said Sky Hartman, a
brand designer who created Ron Paul's 2012 logo.

Hartman and other designers point to President Barack Obama's 2008 logo as
a new benchmark for campaign designs. The O-shape horizon broke tradition
by being a symbol that can be easily identified without the candidate's
name.

"If you can design a concept that sticks in people's minds, you've been
successful," Hartman said.

A number of decisions go into the creative design process. But a key
component of a logo is it's transferability: The typeface, dimension and
color must be small enough to fit on a button or big enough to fill up a
billboard.

Hillary Clinton's campaign attempted the symbol approach, choosing a blue
letter "H" with an arrow going across. Voluntarily created for the campaign
by Michael Bierut, a designer at Pentagram, the logo generated a huge
splash on social media, with some criticizing it for looking like the FedEx
logo, while others thought the red arrow pointing to the right was a little
too Republican.

Clinton's team, however, has been able to replace the blue filling in the
bolded "H" with other colors and images. During the Supreme Court ruling on
same-sex marriage last month, the H was filled with a rainbow. When her
campaign announced it was going to Iowa, her press releases contain the H
filled with a photo of a cornfield.

Just like artwork, logos are open for interpretation and can mean different
things to different people. Still, campaigns generally try to convey
messages of strength, optimism, and hope -- all the while capturing some
element of the candidate's personality.

For Jeb Bush, that means adding punctuation. The former Florida governor
also created a stir when he unveiled his logo, a recycled version of his
gubernatorial brands, with an exclamation point at the end of his first
name, underlined by "2016."

Jimmy Fallon poked fun at the logo when Bush was on "The Tonight Show" last
month. "Do I pronounce it JEB!" Fallon said, shouting the candidate's name.
"Did Regis Philbin come up with this? Jeb! Jeb is running for President
2016! Jeb!"

Bush informed Fallon that Jeb stands for his full name, John Ellis Bush.

"John, exclamation point, probably wouldn't work," the candidate joked.
"But Jeb kinda works a little better."

The punctuation also aided in crafting a logo that could be used in Spanish
-- ¡Jeb! -- drawing attention to his close ties to the Latino community.

The visual strength of a campaign isn't limited to the logo. Campaigns
frequently print banner messages that show up on posters, in ads or on
backdrops at campaign events -- remember the "We Can't Afford Four More
Years" slogan from Romney's campaign.

"Campaigns are judged by how quickly and creatively they respond to real
time events, which can mean changing an event's message at the very last
minute," said John Legittino, who oversaw event production for Romney in
2012 and founded Harbinger Outreach, a production agency that specializes
in political and media optics.

The perfect logo or message banner is short, direct and easy to understand,
he said. Campaigns also have to consider how the colors will show up in a
range of platforms and how logos will look from different camera shots.

"It may sound good in a meeting at campaign headquarters, but will it look
good when it airs on CNN?" he said. "That's the question. It all has to be
designed to translate to TV and photos."

*Early fundraising totals could shape 2016 GOP field
<http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/246858-early-fundraising-totals-could-shape-2016-gop-field>
// The Hill // Ben Kamisar – July 4, 2015*

Republican candidates are looking to use the release of their quarterly
fundraising numbers to show they’ve got what it takes to outlast the
crowded field.

The smart-money favorites are hoping to flex their muscles and fire a
warning shot down the totem pole, while long-shot candidates seek to prove
their mettle.

“This is the first opportunity to publicly separate the A-team 2016
contenders from the wannabes,” Ford O’Connell, a GOP strategist who worked
on Sen. John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) 2008 presidential campaign, told The Hill.

“And for those mired in the middle of the 2016 GOP pack, this is a chance
to outshine expectations and grab some much-needed momentum leading up to
the August debate.”

The second fundraising quarter of 2015 — the first of the race for the
presidential hopefuls who have already declared — ended June 30. Campaigns
have two additional weeks to get the books together before reports are sent
to the Federal Election Commission and later posted online.

Strategists say all eyes are on former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who has
sought out to blow other candidates out of the water with his fundraising
totals.

Fred Malek, a top Republican donor, told The Hill he expects a “heroic
number” when Bush’s campaign total is combined with his super PAC
fundraising numbers.

Bush entered the race with just two weeks left in the fundraising period.
But he spent the preceding months fundraising for his Right to Rise super
PAC, which can accept unlimited funds — instead of a campaign that is
hamstrung by FEC rules.

Because of the super PAC focus, his campaign reports will likely not come
close to the record-breaking $45 million posted by Hillary Clinton on the
other side of the aisle.

But there’s a reason Bush still faces pressure to post an impressive total:
His campaign’s unspoken pitch that he has the fundraising chops to match
Clinton in a general election.

"Hillary went out there and threw up $45 million, he has to put up a number
that looks good relative to the circumstances," O'Connell said.

“You want to set the pace but also, your target is to scare the Clinton
camp.”

Mike Murphy, the head of Right to Rise, reportedly lauded the super PAC’s
success in a donor call and predicted the July filing would give Bush’s
opponents “heart attacks,” according to Buzzfeed News.

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, in second place behind Bush in early polls,
didn’t notify the FEC of his impending candidacy until July. So his
fundraising figures won’t be shared until October.

Sitting in third in polls, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) faces the unique
conundrum of being the other Floridian in the GOP race. A poor showing will
raise concerns that Bush has outmaneuvered him to lock down the Sunshine
State donor pool.

Other candidates aren’t expecting to topple Bush’s combined haul, but
fundraising results can go a long way in proving strength and durability to
help separate a candidate from the pack. Candidates can do that not only
with a large top-line figure, but through cultivating a large base.

“If they can really wow with just raw numbers, that is very helpful to
them,” said Katie Packer, 2012 Republican nominee Mitt Romney’s former
deputy campaign manager.

“But if you have a broad, big well of donors that every time you dip in is
willing to fill up your bucket, that’s very powerful.”

That method worked wonders for President Obama’s elections, Packer added.
Obama dwarfed Romney in percentage of donors giving $200 or less during the
2012 campaign.

Ben Carson, the only Republican candidate to announce his second-quarter
totals thus far, is already plugging that strategy. He announced on
Wednesday an $8.3 million haul from 151,000 donors. Campaign spokesman Doug
Watts told the Associated Press that none of Carson’s GOP challengers will
“come even close to the number of engaged donors.”

Carson’s total poses a particular challenge for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and
former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, both of whom have also touted
grassroots engagement as a main catalyst for their 2016 bids.

Carson, Cruz and Huckabee are thought to be competing for the same group of
evangelical voters. A big fundraising win could help lock down that share
of the electorate for one of them.

The jumbled timeline of the race so far means head-to-head numbers
comparisons don’t tell the whole story. Cruz, Rubio and Sen. Rand Paul
(R-Ky.) were the first entrants into the field. Carson, Huckabee and Carly
Fiorina entered towards the middle, and former Texas Gov. Rick Perry,
former Sen. Rick Santorum (Pa.) and Bush much later in the quarter.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie announced
with just days left in the quarter.

The numbers come in at a key point in the 2016 race, because of
unprecedented rules for the first debates of the primary season.

Debates hosted by Fox News and CNN in August and September are restricted
to just the top 10 contenders, as measured by national polling. Candidates
outside the top 10 will debate separately.

“The key thing for all of them is to get on the debate stage, you almost
don’t care as much as long as you get on the debate stage,” O’Connell said.
“But if you are getting locked out of the debate stage, you better be able
to throw up something that exceeds expectations. ”

Poor fundraising totals could sink a fledgling campaign and give the
impression that a candidate never truly got off of the ground.

Such a problem befell former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty in 2012. He shut
his campaign down shortly after missing expectations with his first
quarterly report, only to find an extremely tight race where low-polling
candidates were able to surge near the top as the actual primaries got
closer.

Packer warned that while the numbers will shape narratives, the candidates’
messages and campaign strategy will have more to do with the results.

Looking back at her experience battling Santorum back in 2012, she said,
“We ran against a much weaker field in 2012 and Mitt Romney was without a
doubt by a factor of 5 the best funded candidate in the campaign.”

“And we still almost lost to somebody that barely had two nickels to rub
together.”

*2016 Hopefuls Flood NH For July 4
<http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/2016-Hopefuls-Flood-New-Hampshire-for-July-4-Weekend--311493051.html>
// NBC // July 3, 2015*

Presidential hopefuls are going on parade throughout the Granite State this
July 4.

At least seven 2016 candidates will spend Independence Day courting
residents who will vote in the nation's first presidential primary contest
next year, according to scheduled logged in necn's 2016 New Hampshire
Primary Candidate Tracker, making a combined 14 stops.

While parades are by far the most popular stops during the holiday tour —
at least 11 such appearances are expected — candidates' Saturday calendars
also include breakfasts, cookouts and grassroots events. Revelers along the
routes in Amherst and Merrimack will watch no fewer than three candidates
strut by. The resort town of Wolfeboro, where 2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney
owns a home, will be greeted by at least two GOP hopefuls.

For some candidates, one parade just isn't enough. Republicans Jeb Bush,
Lindsey Graham, and Rick Perry, as well as Democrat Lincoln Chafee, are
marching in two apiece. Perry, the former Texas governor, appears to have
the busiest public schedule on Saturday so far, stopping by parades in
Amherst and Merrimack before greeting crowds at the Windham GOP July Fourth
Cookout later in the day.

The holiday hand-shaking isn't limited to July 4 itself. Christie, New
Jersey's Republican governor, has been barnstorming the state since making
his official entry into the race on Tuesday, including several events on
Friday. Perry and Democrat Hillary Clinton are also getting their patriotic
partying started early with Friday events, while former New York Gov.
George Pataki and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, both candidates for the GOP
nomination, will join New Hampshire residents wishing America a belated
birthday with Sunday celebrations.

*Chris Christie and Hillary Clinton’s fake followers
<http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2015/07/02/chris-christie-and-hillary-clintons-fake-followers/>
// Reuters // Lena Masri – July 2, 2015 *

Chris Christie, Hillary Clinton and many other presidential hopefuls are
haunted by fake followers on Twitter.

Almost half of Chris Christie’s followers on Twitter are fake. This makes
him the presidential candidate with the highest number of fake followers,
according to Vocativ.

Hillary Clinton comes in second, with 35 percent fake followers, while
presidential candidates Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders have as many as 90
percent real followers, and only 10 percent fake ones.

The numbers are calculated by a social media analysis tool called
TwitterAudit that determines a Twitter account’s authenticity. A fake
Twitter follower can either be a person with an agenda or an account run by
automated software.

*Crowded field: Presidential hopefuls end up marching in the same Foruth of
July parades
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/3/presidential-hopefuls-march-july-fourth-parades-an/>
// Washington Times // Jennifer Harper – July 3, 2015 *

Marching along in a small-town parade on Saturday is the Independence Day
activity of choice for 10 presidential hopefuls who are ready for cheerful
photo ops and meaningful soundbites. But it’s a crowded field. Some of the
rivals are walking in the exact same parades.

In New Hampshire, for example, Jeb Bush, will step to the music in Amherst
and Merrimack. Rick Perry is in the same two parades. So is Sen. Lindsey
Graham and Democratic hopeful Lincoln Chafee. Spectators get
four-for-the-price of one here.

Sen. Marco Rubio will be in Wolfeboro — the swanky summer home of Mitt
Romney — for their big to-do. But Mr. Rubio does not have an exclusive,
though. Gov. Chris Christie also will be there. Hillary Rodham Clinton,
meanwhile, marches with the locals in the towns of Glen and Gorham.

White House hopefuls will also be in Iowa — but without such close
encounters. Gov. Bobby Jindal marches in the Urbandale parade, while Sen.
Bernie Sanders strides the streets of both Creston and Waukee. Martin
O’Malley will walk the parade route in Independence — then ironically
attends a big barbecue in a town called Clinton.

*OPINIONS/EDITORIALS/BLOGS*

*Clinton and Obama are on the wrong side of history
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/clinton-and-obama-are-on-the-wrong-side-of-history/2015/07/03/8e662424-2183-11e5-bf41-c23f5d3face1_story.html>
// WaPo // Dana Milbank – July 3, 2015 *

Scenes from an insurrection:

In Madison, Wis., on Wednesday, 10,000 people show up to rally for
long-shot presidential candidate Bernie Sanders — giving the self-declared
“democratic socialist” the largest crowd any candidate has had in this
election cycle. Sanders, running on a shoestring and a prayer, has closed
to within single digits of Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire and is surging
in Iowa.

In New York on Tuesday, populist Mayor Bill de Blasio lashes out in
vitriolic terms at New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a a fellow Democrat,
accusing him of “games” and politically motivated “revenge.” De Blasio and
other Democrats blast Cuomo’s handling of housing, immigration, the minimum
wage and education.

In Washington last month, an overwhelming majority of Democrats — 158 of
186 in the House and 31 of 44 in the Senate — oppose President Obama on
free-trade legislation. Obama prevails in the vote after failing in a
similar vote earlier in the month, but the episode leaves the president
attempting to repair a deep rift with his fellow Democrats by championing
overtime rules favored by unions.

These are not isolated events. Together, they show anew how the populist
movement is ascendant within the Democratic Party, and they confirm that
the balance of power has shifted. Clinton, who reports raising $45 million
since launching her campaign in April, will almost certainly beat the
upstart 73-year-old with the crazy white hair. Obama won on trade. But
Clinton and Obama are, to borrow a favorite phrase of the president, on the
wrong side of history. As I’ve noted, the country is trending in a more
liberal direction, and a growing proportion of Democrats are hard-core
liberals.

There are various causes, but the change is likely in part a reaction to
the tea party and to the Republican Party’s swing to the right. Democrats
so far have shown less inclination to eat their own, but there is a real
possibility that intraparty fratricide will break out if Clinton and the
rest of the Democratic establishment don’t co-opt the rising populist
movement. In New York, for example, there is already talk of a liberal
primary challenge to Cuomo if he chooses to run again in 2018.

That the Sanders campaign has caught fire is a surprise to just about
everybody, not least the candidate himself, who had his doubts. The
Brooklyn-born Vermonter with a didactic style lacks the fire and charisma
of Elizabeth Warren, who chose not to run. But his call for huge
infrastructure spending and taxing the rich has caught the moment just
right, even if Sanders himself is an imperfect vessel.

In May, Clinton had a 31-point lead in New Hampshire over her nearest
potential Democratic competitor in the WMUR/CNN poll; now she leads Sanders
by only eight points, which because of the poll’s methodology is a
statistical tie. In Iowa, likewise, Clinton had a 45-point lead over
Sanders in May, according to a Quinnipiac University poll. Now her lead has
shrunk to 19 points.

The populist pushback that propels Sanders’s unexpected success also can be
seen in the incendiary remarks of New York’s top populist, de Blasio, who
took the extraordinary step of calling journalists to City Hall to denounce
the governor. He called Cuomo’s actions “not anything like acceptable
government practice,” according to the New York Times.

At the heart of the criticism is a sense that Cuomo, though the son of the
late liberal lion Mario Cuomo, was insufficiently pure in his ideology and
too willing to strike deals with Republicans. Several New York liberals
have begun rumbles of a primary challenge to Cuomo — an effort that would
be like the conservative efforts to purge the Republican Party of RINOs
(Republicans in Name Only) in recent elections.

Obama, too, has been upended by the populist wave. Though he eventually
prevailed in the “fast-track” trade vote, he had nothing like the support
Bill Clinton got when he pushed through the North American Free Trade
Agreement with half of Senate Democrats and 40 percent of House Democrats.
Liberals called that a victory. “This isn’t 1993, and this is not Bill
Clinton’s Democratic Party,” Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), who led Democratic
opposition in the House, wrote in the Huffington Post on Thursday.

Bill Clinton reshaped the party with moderate “New Democrats,” but the new
New Democrats look more like the old. Hillary Clinton, notably, sided with
liberals on the trade legislation, which is smart: If she doesn’t want to
get trampled by populists on the march, she’ll need to grab a baton and
pretend to be the drum major.

*Her emails prove it, Hillary’s just like us
<http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/howie_carr/2015/07/carr_her_emails_prove_it_hillary_s_just_like_us>
// Boston Herald // Howie Carr – July 3, 2015 *

So now all bitter clingers are instructed that Hillary Clinton’s emails —
cherry-picked by her flunkies, reported by her media groupies — somehow
“humanize” her.

In other words, you are supposed to read her emails and think, “Hey — ya
know, Hillary’s just another ‘everyday American’ like me!”

OK, so let’s check her emails out. Here’s one from July 2, 2009. Tell me
this hasn’t happened to you, Mr. and Mrs. John Q. Sixpack. You need to fly
somewhere, so you tell your assistant — you do have an assistant, right? —
to make you a reservation, not for a seat, but for an entire private jet.

And your assistant Huma, who is married to a perv ex-Congressman whose
alias is “Carlos Danger,” gives you the bad news.

“The g3 (Gulfstream 3) is delayed till 5pm wheels up. There is a lear
available at 2pm with 6 seats. Do u want to just leave at 5?”

Huma, do you really expect an everyday American like Hillary to settle for
a tiny private jet that seats only six? She ordered you to get a 19-seat
Gulfstream, as befits Her Highness. Haven’t we all drawn that line in the
sand — I refuse to get on any private jet with fewer than 19 seats! Don’t
you know who I am?

This next one is from Cheryl Mills, a top aide who has issued orders to the
Foggy Bottom minions to stop “twittering” under Hillary’s name. This email
to another aide was sent out at 3:47 p.m. on a Friday afternoon in May 2009.

“You need to walk this to HRC if she is not gone.”

I’m going to go out on a limb and say she was already gone. Friday
afternoon means early slide, right, Hillary?

Did you ever want a nice cold drink in the afternoon? Of course you did.
And you can do one of two things. Number one, get up and get it yourself.
Number two, email your aide to order another lackey, or server, or
waitress, or whatever, to bring you the drink.

Can you guess which option Hillary selected on Sept. 30, 2009?

“Pls call Sarah and ask her if she can get me some iced tea.”

Sometimes, when you’re spending the weekend in China, you see something you
like. So on Dec. 15, 2009, Hillary emailed yet another payroll patriot:

“Can you contact your protocol friend in China and ask him if I could get
photos of the carpets in the rooms I met in w/POTUS during the recent trip?
I love their designs and the way they appeared carved. Any chance we can
get this?”

If you read between the lines, what Hillary’s really asking is for the Red
Chinese to give the rugs to her — on the arm, gratis, for free! Surely it
would be an honor for the Chinese to comp them those nice rugs.

Next, Sonia Sotomayor, the “wise Latina woman” who was confirmed to the
Supreme Court in May 2009. Hillary emails another aide ordering her to get
a number so she can call and congratulate Sotomayor. Only Hillary spells
her name “Sotomyer.”

Misspelling a Hispanic’s name? Isn’t that a “microaggression?” Hey Hillary,
call Huma and tell her to get me an iced tea. And make it snappy!

*Hillary Clinton’s private messages reveal the banality of email
<http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/hillary-clintons-private-messages-reveal-the-banality-ofemail-10364913.html>
// Independent // Alice Jones – July 3, 2015 *

Mid-afternoon on 30 September 2009, Hillary Clinton was feeling thirsty. So
she did what any dehydrated, high-powered woman would do. She fired off a
one-liner email to her aide: “Pls call Sarah and ask her if she can get me
some iced tea.”

What a chain of command for one glass of Lipton, but then Clinton was then
the US Secretary of State. With great power comes great perks. For example,
if I see a carpet I really like when I’m abroad, there is no one in my
inner circle to email back home for further information. No one. Clinton
has people. In an email titled “Don’t Laugh!”, she asks an assistant: “Can
you contact your protocol friend in China and ask if I could get photos of
the carpets of the rooms I met in during the recent trip? I loved their
designs and the way they appeared carved. Any chance we can get this?”

These are just two snippets from 3,000 pages of emails released by the
State Department this week. It emerged in March that Clinton had her own
private account, routed through a server at home when she was in office,
potentially contravening protocols on record-keeping and security. Clinton
has handed over 55,000 pages of emails which will be released over the next
few months. A further 32,000 pages concerning her family, “vacations and
yoga routines” were deemed private by her lawyer and have been deleted.
Still, to judge from this batch, there is plenty to be going on with. If,
that is, what interests you is the endless minutiae of a political life.

Not even the globe’s most powerful can tame the teeming inbox, apparently.
There are emails about coats – one Clinton wore in Kabul got a “77 per cent
favorability rating” according to the assistant secretary of state, queries
about private jets and in-jokes about yurts. There are fawning
congratulations on this or that speech, and an anxiety-inducing number of
“are u awake??” memos sent at all hours, both from and to Clinton.

There is a worryingly insecure grasp of social media – “We should not be
twittering in the Secretary’s name since she is not the person actually
twittering…” – and a hilarious exchange in which Clinton tries and fails to
send a fax (“I’ve done it twice now. Still nothing.”) which took place on
23 December 2009, when no right-thinking person should be sending a fax.

Like any busy boss, Clinton keeps her emails brusque and lower case. There
are no niceties, no how are yous, no all the very bests. She has a gimlet
eye for detail – and not just about carpets. When an aide tells her cover
of Time is “gorgeous”, she shoots back: “How does the article compare to
the cover??” If you wanted to pop psychologise, you could make much of one
Veep-like email that says: “I heard on the radio that there is a Cabinet
mtg this am. Is there? Can I go?” Or of the fact that she hears of Bill
Clinton’s new role as UN Special Envoy to Haiti only via a UN leak. “Wjc
said he was going to call hrc but hasn’t had time.”

There are more serious revelations too, though not many. Most controversial
is her regular contact with Sidney Blumenthal, who was exiled from the
White House for being untrustworthy but still in touch frequently, and she
with him, offering intelligence and guidance on speeches. Cherie Blair does
not come out shining from the 19 emails in which she lobbies Clinton to
meet a Qatari royal. The Benghazi attacks do not figure. And 25 emails have
been rendered “classified” so the really important, actually
in-the-public-interest stuff will likely never appear.

As for the banal to-and-fro of the rest, it will do Clinton no lasting
harm, and may even do her good. Hillary is normal! How many of us, if we
had to trawl through three years’ worth of emails, would not find a pile of
stupid questions, unreasonable demands and unnecessary exclamation marks,
not to mention evidence of our insecurity, authoritarian leanings, vanity
or fatigue at various times?

The pitfalls of living by BlackBerry are many, which is presumably why on 1
December 2009, Clinton emailed a colleague to ask if she could borrow Send
by David Shipley. The book’s subtitle is “Why People Email So Badly and How
to Do it Better”. On the evidence of these blandly efficient, inoffensive,
unrevealing and occasionally amusing emails, I’d say she read it cover to
cover.

*If I were Hillary Clinton, I’d rather Cherie Blair just left me alone
<http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/03/if-i-were-hillary-clinton-id-rather-cherie-blair-just-left-me-alone>
// Guardian // Deborah Orr – July 3, 2015 *

Politics is too important to be left to the bad people. Who knew? Cherie
Blair knew, apparently. But then she forgot. Luckily, Hillary Clinton was
around to coax this easily dismissed insight back to the front of her mind.
“When I see what a difference you are making,” Blair wrote in an email to
Clinton, “it reminds me why politics is too important to be left to the bad
people.” Quick. Get Hallmark on the phone. A greetings card with this on it
could do excellent business in that convenience store at the foot of
Portcullis House.

Not that Blair thought that her cringey brown-nosing was for public
consumption. This pearl was washed up among the detritus of Clinton’s newly
released emails, sent from a private account when they should have been
sent from an official account. Anyone hoping that the emails would contain
information useful to those hoping to destroy Clinton’s presidential bid
must be disappointed, unless liking apples, Chinese rugs and your personal
assistant is politically damaging. If anything, they confirm that powerful
people are pretty much like the rest of us, except that they attract lots
of other powerful people, wanting favours.

The favour Blair wanted from Clinton was a bit odd. Blair wanted Clinton to
meet with Blair’s friend Sheikha Mozah, erstwhile first lady of Qatar,
which was something Qatar’s diplomatic people could have fixed up with the
US’s diplomatic people with perfect ease. After all, they were raining
money on the Clinton Foundation anyway, while Qatar was already established
as a friendly conduit between the US and Iran.

But Blair wouldn’t then have experienced the joy of hooking up one of her
important and powerful friends with another of her important and powerful
friends. Because that’s what the good people like doing. The bad people
like doing it too, though, so it’s all a bit complicated.

It must be nice, seeing yourself as part of a global illuminati of good
people, busily setting good people up with each other, so that all the good
people can get together and do good stuff. It must be extra reassuring to
realise that a proportion of the global population see you and your spouse
as not actually very good people at all.

Different people, good and bad, with different and contradictory opinions,
eh? Very tiresome. But if you keep it simple and decide that all the people
who don’t agree with you are bad, then what can go wrong? Yes, that’s
right. Everything can go wrong. That’s why some of us are quite hung up on
democratic accountability.

I’m afraid I find it a bit creepy that three women whose power devolves
from their marriages are rubbing shoulders like this. All credit to Clinton
for seeking and getting a democratic mandate. None to Blair or Mozah for
just going ahead and behaving as if they had. The ruling Al Thani family,
into which Mozah married, even manage to be effusive supporters of the Arab
spring while hanging grimly on to absolute power themselves.

Blair claims she is exercising her soft power in the cause of “disability”,
and it’s true that Qatar is much more progressive than other states that
operate under sharia law. Still, I remember the days when Blair saw sharia
law as considerably problematic. No matter. When you want to heal the
world, you’ve got to work with what you can get. “You may not know,” Blair
modestly explained to Clinton, “but for the last four years I have been
working with the Qatari’s and in particular with Sheika Moser [sic] on
disability issues in Qatar and I have built up a good relationship with
them.”

Ugh. That almost reads as if building up a good relationship was the point,
not the disability issues. (And at what point in a good relationship do you
learn how to spell someone’s name correctly anyway?) So what, to paraphrase
Mrs Merton, first attracted Blair to the multi-billionaire Sheika Mozah? It
seems vulgar to bang on about the Blairs’ great attraction to vast wealth.
But one can shrug off any feelings of judgy self-righteousness by reminding
oneself that these guys are impervious to such criticism, swaddled as they
are in the soft cashmere of belief in their own rectitude. They deserve to
be very wealthy and to rub shoulders with the very wealthy because they are
good.

Not that the Blairs are the only people who believe in this self-serving
stuff. There are plenty of people in the world who think their splendid
moral purpose is so clearly evident that it needs no public scrutiny. There
are plenty of people, too, who believe that philanthropy could solve all
the troubles on the planet if only they could be left to get on with being
good without interference from the state. Tony Blair was big on the power
of charity. David Cameron and the Conservatives always are. And there’s
nothing wrong with charity, nothing at all, except that it’s an
acknowledgment and exercise of inequality, rather than a corrective to it.

Does it matter that Blair back-channelled Clinton, setting her up in a
meeting with Mozah? Everyone knows, after all, that that’s how things work.
Does it matter that these three women flattered each other with generous
dispensations of each other’s time and energy, in some mutual expression of
each other’s goodness? It does matter that they are all women. Ladies who
lunch are sneered at and patronised far more than men who play golf, even
though it’s historically more likely that the latter would be carving up
something or other in entirely their own interests.

Clinton is not a lady who lunches, by any means. But Blair seems to have
been behaving like a turbo-charged lady who lunches, and dragging Clinton
into it. I’m sure Mozah is an interesting woman, and Blair can be friends
with whoever she likes. But if I held high office – perish the thought –
I’d find people like Blair, so keen to be the one who fixed their Qatari
Sheikha chum up with their US secretary of state chum, a complete and utter
pain in the backside. I wish she would start being less Cherie Blair, wife
of the former prime minister, and more Cherie Booth, leading human rights
lawyer, as she seemed so keen to be when her husband was in No 10.

Or maybe she doesn’t know where one ends and the other begins. Last year,
Booth left Matrix, the human rights chambers she co-founded in 2000, and is
now focussing on Omnia Strategy, which she set up in 2011 – two years after
she wrote those emails – as “a pioneering, international law firm which
provides strategic counsel to governments, corporate and private clients”.
With friends like hers, no doubt the business is thriving.

*TOP NEWS*

*DOMESTIC*

*Obama Plans Broader Use of Clemency to Free Nonviolent Drug Offenders
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/04/us/obama-plans-broader-use-of-clemency-to-free-nonviolent-drug-offenders.html?ref=politics>
// NYT // Peter Baker – July 3, 2015 *

Sometime in the next few weeks, aides expect President Obama to issue
orders freeing dozens of federal prisoners locked up on nonviolent drug
offenses. With the stroke of his pen, he will probably commute more
sentences at one time than any president has in nearly half a century.

The expansive use of his clemency power is part of a broader effort by Mr.
Obama to correct what he sees as the excesses of the past, when politicians
eager to be tough on crime threw away the key even for minor criminals.
With many Republicans and Democrats now agreeing that the nation went too
far, Mr. Obama holds the power to unlock that prison door, especially for
young African-American and Hispanic men disproportionately affected.

But even as he exercises authority more assertively than any of his modern
predecessors, Mr. Obama has only begun to tackle the problem he has
identified. In the next weeks, the total number of commutations for Mr.
Obama’s presidency may surpass 80, but more than 30,000 federal inmates
have come forward in response to his administration’s call for clemency
applications. A cumbersome review process has advanced only a small
fraction of them. And just a small fraction of those have reached the
president’s desk for a signature.

“I think they honestly want to address some of the people who have been
oversentenced in the last 30 years,” said Julie Stewart, the founder and
president of Families Against Mandatory Minimums, a group advocating
changes in sentencing. “I’m not sure they envisioned that it would be as
complicated as it is, but it has become more complicated, whether it needs
to be or not, and that’s what has bogged down the process.”

Overhauling the criminal justice system has become a bipartisan venture.
Like Mr. Obama, Republicans running for his job are calling for systemic
changes. Lawmakers from both parties are collaborating on legislation. And
the United States Sentencing Commission has revised guidelines for drug
offenders, so far retroactively reducing sentences for more than 9,500
inmates, nearly three-quarters of them black or Hispanic.

The drive to recalibrate the system has brought together groups from across
the political spectrum. The Center for American Progress, a liberal
advocacy organization with close ties to the White House and Bill and
Hillary Rodham Clinton, has teamed up with Koch Industries, the
conglomerate owned by the conservative brothers Charles G. and David H.
Koch, who finance Republican candidates, to press for reducing prison
populations and overhauling sentencing.

“It’s a time when conservatives and liberals and libertarians and lots of
different people on the political spectrum” have “come together in order to
focus attention on excessive sentences, the costs and the like, and the
need to correct some of those excesses,” said Neil Eggleston, the White
House counsel who recommends clemency petitions to Mr. Obama. “So I think
the president sees the commutations as a piece of that entire process.”

The challenge has been finding a way to use Mr. Obama’s clemency power in
the face of bureaucratic and legal hurdles without making a mistake that
would be devastating to the effort’s political viability. The White House
has not forgotten the legacy of Willie Horton, a convicted murderer who
raped a woman while furloughed from prison and became a powerful political
symbol that helped doom the presidential candidacy of Gov. Michael S.
Dukakis of Massachusetts in 1988.

But with time running short in Mr. Obama’s presidency, the White House has
pushed the Justice Department to send more applicants more quickly. Mr.
Eggleston told the department not to interpret guidelines too narrowly
because it is up to the president to decide, according to officials. If it
seems like a close case, he told the department to send it over.

Deborah Leff, the department’s pardon attorney, has likewise pressed
lawyers representing candidates for clemency to hurry up and send more
cases her way. “If there is one message I want you to take away today, it’s
this: Sooner is better,” she told lawyers in a video seminar obtained by
USA Today. “Delaying is not helpful.”

Under the Constitution, the president has the power to grant “pardons for
offenses against the United States” or to commute federal sentences. A
pardon is an act of presidential forgiveness and wipes away any remaining
legal liabilities from a conviction. A commutation reduces a sentence but
does not eliminate a conviction or restore civil rights lost as a result of
the conviction.

In recent times, attention has focused on presidential pardons because they
have become politically controversial, such as Gerald R. Ford’s pardon of
Richard M. Nixon, the elder George Bush’s pardons of Iran-contra figures
and Bill Clinton’s pardons of the financier Marc Rich and scores of others.

Modern presidents have been far less likely to commute sentences. Lyndon B.
Johnson commuted the sentences of 80 convicted criminals in the 1966 fiscal
year, and no president since then has matched that in his entire
administration, much less in a single year. Ronald Reagan commuted only 13
sentences in eight years in office, while George W. Bush commuted just 11
in the same amount of time. The elder Mr. Bush commuted three sentences in
his four years.

Mr. Obama started out much like the others, commuting just one sentence in
his first five years in office. But in his first term he signed a law
easing sentencing for new inmates by reducing the disparity between crack
and powder cocaine, while his attorney general, Eric H. Holder Jr., issued
new guidelines to prosecutors to avoid charges requiring excessive prison
terms.

In his second term, Mr. Obama embarked on an effort to use clemency and has
raised his total commutations to 43, a number he may double this month. The
initiative was begun last year by James M. Cole, then the deputy attorney
general, who set criteria for who might qualify: generally nonviolent
inmates who have served more than 10 years in prison, have behaved well
while incarcerated and would not have received as lengthy a sentence under
today’s revised rules.

“It’s a touchy situation,” Mr. Cole said in an interview. “You don’t want
to just supplant a judge’s determination of sentence.” But after reviewing
many clemency petitions, he said, “I’d seen a number of them where the
sentences seemed very high for the conduct and it noted that the judge at
the time of sentencing thought the sentence was too high. We looked at that
and thought this really isn’t supplanting the judge.”

To respond to Mr. Cole’s call, several groups formed a consortium of
lawyers to prepare applications for inmates, including the American Bar
Association, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Association
of Criminal Defense Lawyers and Ms. Stewart’s advocacy group. The more than
30,000 inmates who applied inundated the effort.

The consortium, called Clemency Project 2014, now has more than 50 law
firms, more than 20 law schools and more than 1,500 lawyers participating.
But the process is burdensome as the volunteer lawyers try to dig out
documents from more than a decade ago to satisfy the criteria. So far, they
have screened out 13,000 inmates who did not meet the guidelines and sent
just over 50 applications to the Justice Department.

Cynthia W. Roseberry, who left her job as a top federal public defender in
Georgia to lead the project, said it took a while to set up a process but
it has now been streamlined. “The lawyers will be able to do the analysis a
lot quicker and we’ll be able to move them faster,” she said.

Aside from the Clemency Project, the Justice Department has received more
than 6,600 applications for commutations since Mr. Cole outlined the
criteria, more than twice the rate over a similar period earlier in Mr.
Obama’s presidency. Ms. Leff, the pardon attorney, has solicited volunteers
from around the department to give a day or more a week to help out, but
her office is taxed. The White House has asked Congress to increase funding
for the office from $3.9 million this year to $5.9 million next year.

Margaret Love, who served as pardon attorney under the first Mr. Bush and
Mr. Clinton and now represents prisoners applying for clemency, said the
process had become a mess. “It’s really poor management,” she said. “These
are people who don’t have any history with sentence reduction. They’ve been
putting people in prison all their lives. They don’t know how to get them
out.”

Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, the Republican chairman of the
Judiciary Committee, has expressed concern that the Justice Department has
essentially outsourced a government function to the Clemency Project 2014.
Department officials dispute that, saying the project does the same thing
lawyers have always done in helping candidates for clemency prepare
applications.

The department noted that it still reviews the cases and makes it own
judgments before sending recommendations to the White House. Officials
acknowledged that it was slow in starting the effort. “There was a start-up
time, but now we’re really in it,” said Emily Pierce, a department
spokeswoman. “We feel we’re moving at a good pace.”

In December, Mr. Obama commuted the sentences of eight drug offenders, and
in March he followed up with 22 more. If he accepts most of the latest
applications sent to the White House, some officials said it would probably
double that last batch of 22, exceeding the 36 commutations Mr. Clinton
issued at one time on his last day in office.

Among those Mr. Obama granted clemency in March were eight prisoners
serving life sentences for crimes like possession with intent to distribute
cocaine, growing more than 1,000 marijuana plants or possession of a
firearm by a convicted felon.

Mr. Obama signed letters to the recipients explaining that they had
demonstrated the potential to turn their lives around. “By doing so, you
will affect not only your own life, but those close to you,” he wrote. “You
will also influence, through your example, the possibility that others in
your circumstances get their own second chance in the future.

“I believe in your ability to prove the doubters wrong,” he added. “So good
luck, and Godspeed.”

*Despair and Anger as Puerto Ricans Cope With Debt Crisis
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/04/us/despair-and-anger-as-puerto-ricans-cope-with-debt-crisis.html?ref=us>
// NYT // Lizette Alvarez – July 3, 2015 *

It’s the lunch hour at Baker’s Bakery, a fixture in Río Piedras, one of
Puerto Rico’s oldest neighborhoods, but the bustle at the counter is long
gone. The front door opens and shuts only a few times an hour as customers,
holding tighter than ever to their money, judiciously pick up some
sugar-sprinkled pastries and a café con leche.

On the first day of the new sales tax, which jumped to 11.5 percent from 7
percent, the government’s latest rummage for more revenue, Puerto Rico’s
malaise was unmistakable.

“People don’t even answer you when you tell them, ‘Buenos dias,’ ” said
Ibrahim Baker, 55, on Wednesday as he stood at the cash register of the
bakery he has owned for 25 years. “Everyone is depressed.”

After nearly a decade of recession, Puerto Rico’s government says it cannot
pay its $73 billion debt much longer. Gov. Alejandro García Padilla warns
that more austerity is on the way, a necessity for an island now working
feverishly to rescue itself. With so many bracing for another slide toward
the bottom, the sense of despair grows more palpable by the day.

“So many people are leaving you can’t even find suitcases,” said Erica
Lebrón, 30, as she sat outside a housing project bodega.

Before long, Puerto Ricans will face more tax increases — the next one is
in October. Next on the list of anticipated measures, these for government
workers, are fewer vacations, overtime hours and paid sick days. Others in
Puerto Rico may face cuts in health care benefits and even bus routes, all
changes that economic advisers say should be made to jump-start the economy.

People ricochet from anger to resignation back to anger again. Along San
Juan’s colonial-era streets, in homes and shops, Puerto Ricans blame the
government for the economic debacle. Election after election, they say,
political leaders took the easy way out, spending more than they had,
borrowing to prop up the budget, pointing fingers at one another and
failing to own up to reality.

“It’s very, very, very worrisome,” said Mr. Baker, who added that he wanted
the federal government to oversee the rescue plan because “in the hands of
Puerto Rico’s politicians, this will never get better.”

For Mr. Baker, each year has been worse than the one before. He first
opened his business here 25 years ago, not too far from the University of
Puerto Rico. At one time, 23 employees served up pasteles and tortas. Now
he has one worker, and his daughter, a recent college graduate who cannot
find a job, also works behind the counter. Sales have plummeted 50 percent
and, over the years, he has been forced to close two other businesses.

Taxes continue to go up. But so do other costs. Living on an island, many
business owners must ship their goods in from a mainland port, already a
costly proposition. But a 1920 law, the Jones Act, which requires Puerto
Rico to receive its shipments from the United States on American-built
ships with mainly American crews, makes the cost of transporting goods even
more expensive. Recently, it got costlier, Mr. Baker said.

Now there is a chorus of calls for Congress to relax the law as it relates
to Puerto Rico. And some powerful Democrats are rallying behind the idea of
granting Puerto Rico, a commonwealth, the ability to file bankruptcy for
some of its debt-laden agencies.

“I have to pass some of these costs on to customers,” Mr. Baker lamented, a
tray of bread at the ready and an espresso machine churning in the
background. For example, the price of ham, he said, recently increased for
him to $2.39 a pound from $1.19 a pound because of shipping costs. “So we
have fewer customers. Some months nothing is left over for us after we have
paid the bills.”

The high cost of electricity and water in Puerto Rico also make running his
bakery, and paying his bills at home, all the harder. “I am stuck here
because I have no alternatives,” he said. “I don’t have the opportunity now
to even try.”

Many others in Puerto Rico, including a stream of professionals and
middle-class workers, have sought alternatives. They have moved to the
mainland for jobs and better prospects. Over the past decade, Puerto Rico
has lost more than 5 percent of its population, which now numbers 3.6
million, according to a New York Federal Reserve report. An additional
250,000 people are expected to leave by 2020, according to the Puerto Rico
Planning Board.

This year, the government closed dozens of schools across the island. About
40 percent of the island’s municipalities now have more old people than
children, which means fewer workers in the pipeline and a greater need for
benefits like Medicare.

A few blocks from the bakery, Paseo de Diego, a pedestrian corridor once
buzzing with shops and shoppers, sits nearly empty. Store after store has
closed, their metal grates covered in graffiti, except for a stretch near a
busy market.

With his hats for sale on a display on the grates of a closed store along
the Paseo, José Vasquez Torres, 67, said business was more than slow. “I’ve
been here since 6 a.m. and not sold a single hat.”

Sitting on a folding chair next to the hats, his partner, María L. Luyando
Hernandez, 62, held a thick sheaf of papers. Even a business as small and
mobile as this one, she said, requires paperwork, payments and permits.

“These are all the papers we have to fill out to sell hats here,” she said.
The couple owe $461 for the permit but they do not have the money. Not too
long ago, the cost of a permit, Ms. Luyando said, was $21. Some sellers
were able to take out loans at inexpensive interest rates to keep their
businesses going, but Mr. Vasquez said he did not qualify because he had
failed to pay his phone bill.

Despite a growing stack of unpaid bills, the couple manage to get by, Ms.
Luyando said, because they live in affordable Section 8 housing — a small
one-bedroom apartment nearby — and receive food stamps.

“We are behind,” she said, “we are always behind.”

Far more people use food stamps here — 35 percent — than on the United
States mainland, a reflection of Puerto Rico’s poverty rate of 41 percent,
nearly double that of the poorest state, Mississippi. And about 60 percent
are enrolled in Medicaid or some form of Medicare.

A health care crisis now looms. The federal government plans to cut
Medicare Advantage, a popular private program run with Medicare funds, by
11 percent next year, a reduction that has already triggered rallies and
protest.

Angel Ramon Rivera, 57, a friend of Mr. Vasquez, the hat seller, recently
received some training as a sound engineer and is working as a D.J.,
charging small amounts because no one can afford more. Like many in Puerto
Rico, he is part of the underground economy, which makes it easier for him
to do business but harder for the government to collect taxes. But the work
is sporadic and he, too, collects food stamps. He is saving his money to
get out of Puerto Rico.

As he talks, his anger bubbles up. “They want us to pay for their
mistakes,” Mr. Rivera said, of the lawmakers. “This is not our fault. And
they shouldn’t raise taxes on the rich, either. It’s not their fault. It’s
the fault of the legislature.”

Mercedes Martinez, the new head of the Teachers Federation of Puerto Rico,
said the deepening crisis and calls for more austerity will once again hit
the working class.

“We all have to sacrifice but workers have already sacrificed too much,”
she said of the sales tax, layoffs and pension cuts. “We are not willing to
make one more sacrifice. The ones who need to sacrifice are the people who
created this.”

“We will throw ourselves into the streets, if we have to,” she added.

Leaning against a lamppost near the Paseo, his measuring tape around his
neck, Porfirio Guerrero, 61, said he feels drained.

Sastrería Pachín, the tailor shop he owns, used to offer him a good life.
Now he lists his troubles in numbers: His water bill, made worse by a
drought here, has gone up to $64 a month from $21, and he barely uses
water. Thirty stores on his street have closed in the past 10 years or so.
It is 11:30 a.m. and not one customer has stopped in.

“Before, I went to the movies, I drank some beers with friends,” he said.
“Now I go from the business to my home. That’s it. It’s suffocating.”

He arrived here from the Dominican Republic 28 years ago — “a lifetime ago”
— and worked hard to build a life. He succeeded, against hard odds, not
always easy for Dominicans, who sometimes face discrimination here.

“I guess the government thinks that because we have jobs, we are fine,” Mr.
Guerrero said. It’s not that simple, he added, gesturing toward the empty
street. “I just look down there and want to cry. We feel like we are a
forgotten people in a forgotten land.”

*Obama to meet with leader of Vietnam’s Communist Party at the White House
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/03/president-obama-to-meet-with-leader-of-vietnams-communist-party-at-the-white-house/>
// WaPo // David Nakamura – July 3, 2015 *

President Obama on Tuesday will meet with the general secretary of
Vietnam's Communist Party, the first such visit at the White House since
the two countries normalized relations two decades ago.

Obama and Nguyen Phu Trong are expected to discuss a range of issues,
including the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade accord,
bilateral defense cooperation and human rights, the White House said in a
statement.

The meeting will mark a rare time that Obama has played host in the Oval
Office to a foreign leader who is not the official head of state. Obama met
with Vietnamese President Truong Tan Sang at the White House in 2013, and
he met with Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung during a regional summit in
Burma last fall.

Administration officials said the meeting will provide a chance for Obama
to engage directly with Trong, who is perhaps Vietnam's most powerful
figure even though he does not have an official government position.
Vietnam is among the nations negotiating the TPP trade pact with the United
States, and over the past two years, Vietnam has been alarmed by China's
maritime operations in the South China Sea.

U.S. officials see an opportunity to improve relations with Vietnam.

"We see the visit as an opportunity to continue to build on that positive
momentum," a State Department official said this week during a background
briefing for reporters. "Specifically, it's important for head of the party
[to visit]. The party is the only party in Vietnam. It's hugely important
in all decision-making, and it tends to be a more conservative element of
Vietnamese leadership."

Human rights advocates have expressed alarm at Trong's visit, saying that
nation has not made significant progress in releasing political prisoners
and improving labor rights for workers.

There has been speculation among some foreign affairs experts in Washington
that Obama could make his first visit to Vietnam this fall during his trip
to Asia, but the White House has not confirmed such a visit.

*INTERNATIONAL*

*ISIS Destroys More Artificats in Syria and Iraq
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/04/world/middleeast/isis-destroys-artifacts-palmyra-syria-iraq.html?ref=world>
// NYT // Rick Gladstone and Maher Samaan – July 3, 2015 *

Islamic State militants indulged in new public displays of artifact
destruction this week, sledgehammering a half-dozen statues said to have
been stolen from the ancient Syrian city of Palmyra.

The militants also broke up a hidden 2,000-year-old lion statue they
discovered in a Palmyra museum garden and demolished a 13th-century tomb
near the northern Iraqi city of Kirkuk.

The destruction, publicized in photographs and statements posted by the
Islamic State on social media and corroborated by officials and antiquities
experts, underscored the risks to the archaeological heritage sites in
Syria and Iraq, as well as the impunity of the militants now in command of
large parts of both countries.

On Thursday, the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, said it had
smashed at least six statues from Palmyra seized from a smuggler in an area
of Aleppo controlled by the group’s operatives in northern Syria.

Aleppo Fighting Flares as Syria Insurgents AttackJULY 3, 2015

It said the smuggler had been prosecuted by a Shariah court in the town of
Manbij and punished with a public flogging. Photos posted by the Islamic
State included a sledgehammer and statue remnants.

On Friday, Iraqi antiquities experts said the Islamic State had wrecked a
tomb dating from the middle of the 13th century about seven miles west of
Hawija, a town in Kirkuk Province. Before-and-after photographs showed the
rubble.

“This is a terrible and tragic addition to ISIS’s long list of never-ending
and incomprehensible destruction of some of Iraq’s and Syria’s most
important historic monuments,” said Ihsan Fethi, a heritage expert and
member of the Iraqi Architects Society.

Dismissing international outrage over its pillaging of ancient treasures in
the two countries, the Islamic State has said it regarded artifacts as
sacrilegious vestiges that deserve to be obliterated. In propaganda videos
and photos, the group has detailed the wreckage of a museum in Mosul, Iraq,
and important archaeological sites in Nimrud, Hatra and Nineveh, Iraq.

On Thursday, Irina Bokova, the director general of Unesco, the United
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, told a meeting
in London that the antiquities destruction had “reached unprecedented
levels in modern history.”

In May, as Islamic State fighters encircled Palmyra in central Syria,
antiquities officials there rushed to move or hide many its treasures. The
city is known for its 2,000-year-old ruins.

Last month, the group blew up two historic tombs near Palmyra, online
photographs showed. But Thursday was the first time that the Islamic State
said it had destroyed Palmyra statues.

There also was speculation that Islamic State fighters might have posted
photographs of fake statue remnants and sought to smuggle the real ones
themselves.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a British-based group with a
network of monitors inside Syria, said its sources in Manbij, where the
purported statue smuggler was punished, said the Islamic State had
confiscated the statues “in preparation to sell them in one of the
neighboring countries.” The observatory’s account could not be corroborated.

Syria’s official news agency, which said at least eight plundered Palmyra
statues had been confiscated by the Islamic State in Manbij, also reported
the destruction of a famed 2,000-year-old statue in Palmyra on Thursday.
Known as Allat God, the statue depicts a lion catching a deer.

The agency said that the statue, first discovered in 1977, had been hidden
inside an iron box in a Palmyra museum garden for protection but that
militants had discovered the hideaway.

*A wave of recent attacks by Palestinians set Israelis on edge
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/a-wave-of-recent-attacks-by-palestinians-sets-israelis-on-edge/2015/07/02/752d97b6-1ff4-11e5-a135-935065bc30d0_story.html>
// WaPo // William Booth – July 3, 2015 *

On Monday, Maysoon Musa rose early for morning prayers, then helped harvest
squash in the family fields. She acted “perfectly normal,” said her mother,
who described her daughter as “just a quiet girl, as shy as a chicken.”

Then the 19-year-old university student went to Checkpoint 300 in
Bethlehem, a busy, depressing turnstile through the high gray concrete wall
that separates the Palestinian territory in the West Bank from Israel.
There, according to Israeli authorities, Musa removed a curved dagger from
her bag and then stabbed and wounded a female Israeli military police
officer in the neck. The victim was Liron Yisraeli, also 19.

The assault, a few miles south of Jerusalem’s Old City, was one of seven
major attacks against Israelis in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem
over the past two weeks. The pace and mixed style of violence — ambushes,
stabbings, drive-by shootings — have broken a months-long period of
relative calm and set many on edge.

There has also been violence from the Israeli side, including the fatal
shooting Friday morning of a 17-year-old Palestinian who had thrown rocks
at a senior military commander’s vehicle.

Israeli military and police — and ordinary Israelis and Palestinians — are
now wondering: Is this another brief flare-up in the conflict or the
beginning of a larger conflagration?

The first attack against Israelis occurred June 19 near a popular spring
west of Ramallah and close to a Jewish settlement in the West Bank. An Arab
assailant fatally shot an Israeli hiker and escaped.

Two days later, a Palestinian stabbed a border police officer at the
Damascus Gate outside the Old City. The attacker was shot and wounded.

A few days passed, and then, at a checkpoint in the Jordan Valley, a
Palestinian opened fire with a handgun at Israeli soldiers. He was shot
dead.

Days later, a gunman fired multiple rounds into a car carrying four young
Israelis near another Jewish settlement in the West Bank. They had just
finished playing basketball. One of the Israelis was killed. The assailant
escaped.

Israelis are especially anxious about whether the attacks are the work of
organized cells directed by armed factions, such as the Islamist group
Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip and is present in the West Bank; or if
the violence is being driven by “lone wolf” perpetrators who strike out for
personal or political reasons, or both.

Was Musa recruited to a cell? Her attorney, Ameer Yasin, told The
Washington Post that Musa confessed to Israel’s domestic intelligence
agency that she came to the checkpoint to attack a soldier. The attorney
said he did not know whether Musa acted alone. He said he was worried,
though, about her mental state and had convinced the Israelis to allow a
psychological evaluation.

Musa’s mother said her relatives don’t know what happened. Her family has
nothing to do with politics, neighbors said. Musa’s mother said her
daughter was engaged to be married — a date had been set for August and the
wedding dress ordered. Musa studied English literature at a West Bank
satellite of Al Quds University.

Ramadan connection?

The recent spate of attacks coincided with the start of the Islamic holy
month of Ramadan, when the devout fast during the day — forgoing food,
water, cigarettes — and then celebrate with evening prayer and feasts after
sundown.

“We don’t know, is it Ramadan? Or is it a strategic change?” Maj. Gen.
Nitzan Alon, commander of the operations branch in the Israel Defense
Forces, said in an interview.

“Under the surface, the temperature is very high,” Alon said. “We try to
put the cover on the pot, but it is an unstable situation.”

Alon said the past decade of Israeli counterterrorism efforts, coupled
with cooperation from Palestinian security forces, has crippled the
organization of large-scale attacks from the West Bank. Alon conceded that
it is difficult to detect small terror cells and almost impossible to
predict when a Palestinian is going to decide to ram his vehicle into a
group of police at a tram stop — a common strategy six months ago.

Early Friday, Palestinian Authority forces arrested more than 100 Hamas
members in the West Bank who were planning on carrying out attacks, a
Palestinian official told the Associated Press. It was biggest raid of its
kind since 2007.

A spokesman for Palestinian security, Adnan Dameri, told the news agency:
“We will not let Hamas undermine our security and draw our country to
bloodshed. We will not let Hamas carry out attacks in the West Bank.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s new coalition government is
howling for the military and police to take stronger action and reverse
decisions to loosen travel restrictions to Jerusalem during Ramadan to
allow Muslims from the West Bank and Gaza to visit al-Aqsa mosque in the
Old City, the third holiest site in Islam.

“The terrorist organizations must receive the message that the blood of
Israeli citizens, especially residents of Judea and Samaria, cannot be shed
with impunity,” Israeli Agriculture Minister Uri Ariel told Netanyahu,
using place names from the Hebrew Bible to refer to the West Bank.

“The month of Ramadan has become a holiday of sacrifice in which Jews are
the victims,” he said.

Abbas silent

On Tuesday, Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon accused the Palestinian
Authority of inciting the attacks, alleging that Palestinians spend the day
watching anti-Israel programming on TV and then head out to kill civilians.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has not spoken about the recent spate
of attacks. The Palestinian Authority, however, has countered that Israelis
are partly responsible for the soaring tensions. Israeli troops have
stepped up raids and arrests across the West Bank, Palestinian officials
say.

However, Amos Yadlin, director of the Institute for National Security
Studies in Tel Aviv and a retired Israeli general, said he believed the
recent attacks on Israelis were the “work of an organized cell.”

“It is no longer just someone waking up in the morning, going to the
mosque, hearing incitement and carrying out an attack,” he said. “It is
people working with guns; it is ambushes."

*Iran to US: Nuke deal could result in joint cooperation
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/0673b5cdf3a942908ac7c1ec0c9c6197/un-nuke-agency-chief-says-more-work-needed-iran-probe>
// AP // George Jahn and Matthew Lee – July 3, 2015 *

In a message to Washington, Iran's foreign minister on Friday called for an
end to "coercion and pressure" at the nuclear talks, suggesting a deal
acceptable to his country will open the door to cooperation on fighting the
upsurge of Middle East extremism threatening both nations' interests.

Mohammad Javad Zarif did not mention the United States by name in his video
message. But with the Iran six-power talks having devolved essentially into
bilateral U.S.-Iran negotiations over the past year, his comments were
clearly directed at the Americans, who have been the primary drivers of the
crippling economic sanctions imposed on his country over its nuclear
program.

Any deal would result in an end to the sanctions. But negotiations remain
bogged down ahead of the extended July 7 target date for an agreement.

The West fears Iran could develop its nuclear program to make weapons while
Iran insists it is only meant to generate power and for other peaceful
uses. Suggesting that Islamic extremism is a far greater threat to the
world than his country's atomic activities, Zarif called for an end to
"unjust economic sanctions" and for the West to join Iran in common cause
against "the growing menace of violent extremism and outright barbarism."

"The menace we're facing — and I say we, because no one is spared — is
embodied by the hooded men who are ravaging the cradle of civilization,"
Zarif said. He called for realignment from Iran's nuclear activities,
saying it was time to "open new horizons to address important, common
challenges."

Zarif and U.S Secretary of State John Kerry have taken the lead in the
negotiations. In comments echoed by Zarif ahead of their renewed meeting on
Friday evening, Kerry said the talks "are making progress." But he also
spoke of "some tough issues," telling reporters, "We have a lot of work to
do."

The Obama administration says that at least part of the sanctions relief
for Iran under any pact will depend on Iran's full cooperation with the
U.N's International Atomic Energy Agency to probe allegations that Tehran
worked secretly on atomic weapons. But hopes of progress any time soon on
that issue dimmed Friday.

Yukiya Amano, head of the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency, said
his meetings with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani resulted in a "better
understanding on some ways forward," but that "more work will be needed."
The formulation of his statement was similar to previous ones issued by the
IAEA, which has struggled for nearly a decade to resolve its concerns.

Amano's trip Thursday to Tehran was significant because it represented his
last chance to secure access and cooperation before the July 7 target date.

Rouhani also provided no hint of substantial progress. Iran has previously
acknowledged some activities like experiments with detonators, but says
those activities had no connection to exploding a nuclear device and were
instead developed for industrial purposes.

Repeating the standard Iranian line, Rouhani said after meeting Amano that
the agency now understands the "pointless allegations" are "baseless."

The issue was put on the IAEA front burner four years ago when the agency
published an annex of 12 alleged activities it said pointed to nuclear
weapons research and development by Iran.

A U.S. intelligence assessment published in 2007 raised similar
allegations, but said the work ended early last decade. Iran says the
suspicions are based on doctored intelligence from Israel, the United
States and other adversaries.

The U.N. agency's investigation has gained even more significance as part
of the overall nuclear talks.

Amano said he discussed his agency's monitoring of Iran's commitments under
any deal. Backed by the U.S., the agency seeks pervasive oversight to
ensure Tehran doesn't cheat.

But Iran rejects any extraordinary inspection rules.

Speaking to reporters in Austria's capital Thursday a senior Iranian
official said the IAEA's standard rules governing access to government
information, sites of interest and scientists should be sufficient to
ensure that his country's program is peaceful.

Iran has committed to implementing the IAEA's "additional protocol" for
inspections and monitoring as part of an accord. The protocol gives the
IAEA expanded access to declared and potentially undeclared nuclear sites,
and to the sensitive information of the more than 120 governments that
accept its provisions.

But the rules don't guarantee monitors can enter any facility they want to
and offer no specific guidance about sensitive military sites — an issue of
particular interest with Iran, given the long-standing allegations of
secret nuclear weapons work.

*Iran’s foreign minister: ‘We have never been closer to a lasting outcome’
<http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/irans-foreign-minister-we-have-never-been-closer-to-a-lasting-outcome-119720.html?ml=tl_4>
// Politico // Jennifer Shutt and Nahal Toosi – July 3, 2015 *

Iran’s foreign minister says he believes international negotiators are
tantalizingly close to reaching a nuclear deal with his country, but warned
that the U.S. and its partners must choose between coercion and agreement.

“At this eleventh hour, despite some differences that remain, we have never
been closer to a lasting outcome,” Javad Zarif said in a four-minute video
posted Friday to YouTube. “But there is no guarantee.”

His statement was recorded in Vienna, where he has been meeting with
Secretary of State John Kerry with the hopes of reaching a deal that lifts
sanctions on Iran in return for curbs on its nuclear program.

Negotiators unveiled a preliminary deal in April, but failed to meet a June
30 deadline for a final, comprehensive deal, so they extended the talks
until Tuesday. The two sides have been trying to bridge gaps on issues such
as the pace of sanctions relief and the amount of access the U.N.’s nuclear
watchdog agency will have to Iranian sites.

In the video, which begins and ends with soft piano music, the
U.S.-educated Zarif said “military and economic coercion” cannot “ensure
submission.” He also suggested that the U.S. and its partners came to the
negotiating table because of Iran’s fortitude, as opposed to Iran agreeing
to talks due to years of sanctions that have crippled its economy.

“I sense that my negotiating partners have recognized that coercion and
pressure never lead to lasting solutions, but to more conflict and further
hostility,” he said. “And now, they realize that the most indiscriminate
and unjust economic sanctions against my country have achieved absolutely
none of their declared objectives; but instead have harmed innocents and
antagonized a peaceful and forgiving nation.”

Zarif also raised the possibility of future cooperation among the
countries, including against the Sunni-extremist Islamic State terrorist
group, which has grabbed large chunks of Iraq and Syria.

“The menace we’re facing – and I say we, because no one is spared – is
embodied by the hooded men who are ravaging the cradle of civilization,” he
said. “To deal with this new challenge new approaches are badly needed.”

The U.S. considers Iran a leading sponsor of terrorism, and has said that
sanctions related to the Tehran’s links to terrorists will not be lifted as
part of the nuclear deal. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is
purely peaceful, but the West suspects it is designed to make weapons.

Zarif wrapped up his remarks in the video with what apparently was supposed
to be a note of inspiration, quoting the ancient Persian poet Ferdowsi: “Be
relentless in striving for the cause of good. Bring the spring, you must.
Banish the winter, you should.”