Subject: RE: CCI
From: Amitabh Desai <[email-masked]>
To: Bruce Lindsey <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:04:28 -0500

Should we remove solar, CCS, and forestry from the CF Trustee document? Or leave it in since it's partly retrospective; and when we present CCI on Friday we can focus more on the future? Sorry for all the questions. Just want to be sure we present it appropriately on Friday to the Trustees. Thanks Bruce. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Lindsey 
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 3:47 PM
To: [email-masked]; Amitabh Desai
Subject: Re: CCI

I would simply not talk about solar, CCS or forestry, not announce that we are exiting them

----- Original Message -----
From: John Podesta <[email-masked]>
To: Amitabh Desai
Cc: Bruce Lindsey
Sent: Mon Feb 06 15:42:45 2012
Subject: Re: CCI

I'd call pensions retrofits, but yes that was the list. Cutting solar is sensitive if no one has had a real conversation with Ira. Bruce, how do you want to handle?

On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Amitabh Desai <[email-masked]> wrote:
> Dear Bruce and John, just to be 100% sure as we finalize the documents 
> for the CF trustee retreat on Friday, is the list below the full range 
> of CCI/climate programs on your list of 8 that we discussed? Thanks, 
> Ami
>
> EXCLUDING CITIES:
>
> CONTINUE:
> Pensions
> HEAL
> Islands
> Asia/Ruby
>
> CUT / LET EXPIRE:
> Forestry
> CCS
> Solar
>
> STILL BEING DEFINED:
> Adaptation think tank