Subject: RE: more analysis on special interest and corruption questions
From: "Andrew Baumann" <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked], "ic2008" <[email-masked]>, "Stan Greenberg" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Tara McGuinness" <[email-masked]>, "Begala, Paul" <[email-masked]>, "Susan McCue" <[email-masked]>, "John Podesta" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:20:18 -0500

Tom,

I'm not exactly clear what you are asking for.  Are you talking about
who is moving on the honest and trustworthy and/or unethical attributes
for each candidates?

Are you talking about who shifts due to our special interests attacks?

________________________________

From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Tom
Matzzie
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 6:18 PM
To: ic2008; Stan Greenberg
Cc: Tara McGuinness; Begala, Paul; Susan McCue; John Podesta
Subject: more analysis on special interest and corruption questions

GQR Team, 

Can we get some more analysis on the special interest and corruption
questions? Who is moving on them? Dem-Indy-GOP differences. Age, gender
differences. Regressions etc... How does this compare to other
questions? 

There is the WRONG TRACK question at the beginning of the poll and then
some of the questions in the doubts batteries.

Thanks,

-Tom