Subject: Re: Summary Page for Report
From: Andrew Kessel <[email-masked]>
To: John Podesta <[email-masked]>
Cc: Bruce Lindsey <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:38:26 -0500

I could do that, will have it in a few minutes. 

Andrew Kessel
501-951-4461

On Dec 15, 2011, at 7:35 AM, "John Podesta" <[email-masked]> wrote:

> wouldn't it be better and more accurate to list a development expense
> line for 2011 (real) and 2012 (budgeted) and a revenue line for 2011
> and $0 for 2012?
> 
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Andrew Kessel
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> I'm aware of development but by listing it as having 0 income in 2012, we end up with the bottom line raise need.
>> 
>> Andrew Kessel
>> 501-951-4461
>> 
>> On Dec 15, 2011, at 7:24 AM, "John Podesta" <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I think Haiti relief fund and haiti chai should be seperate items
>>> below the line box. Also the way development shows in the top box is
>>> weird.  One number (2011) is a net and the other (2012) is gross
>>> expenses?
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Kessel
>>> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>>> So how do you two feel about the attached?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I would accept wordsmithing  on the titles for the two sections.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Andy
>>>> 
>>>>