Subject: Re: WaPo - Draft Quote
From: Angel Urena <[email-masked]>
To: Craig Minassian <[email-masked]>
Cc: Tina Flournoy <[email-masked]>, Bruce Lindsey <[email-masked]>, Cheryl Mills Contact <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, Maura Pally <[email-masked]>, Bari Lurie <[email-masked]>, Matt McKenna - gmail <[email-masked]>, "Nick Merrill ([email-masked])" <[email-masked]>, Kamyl Bazbaz <[email-masked]>, Amitabh Desai <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:52:45 +0000

These are certainly not as powerful, but here are some alternatives: 

-- 100 tons of medical supplies to West Africa to combat the Ebola outbreak in the region. 

OR 

-- the thousands of Haitian students who will be able to become medical professionals thanks to our efforts in rebuilding the main building at he Faculty of Sciences at the State University of Haiti.

> On Feb 25, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Craig Minassian <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> “As with other global charities, we rely on the support of individuals, organizations, corporations and governments who have the shared goal of addressing critical global challenges in a meaningful way. When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it goes towards Foundation programs that save lives. The majority of this support from governments is for specific, multi-year programs that are improving the lives of millions of people around the world and were underway well before Secretary Clinton took office.  It’s hard to imagine someone arguing that funding should be cut off for the more than 8 million people getting access to live-saving HIV/AIDS medicine in more than 70 countries, the nearly 40,000 farmers in Malawi, Tanzania, and Rwanda trying to earn a better living or the reduction of 33,500 tons of greenhouse gas emissions annually.”