Subject: RE: Peter baker
From: "Anita Dunn" <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:19:27 -0500

I understand the McCain campaign just dumped their transition plan out,
which will put that much more pressure on us (of course, we're measuring
the drapes!)
I don't want you to hurt your relationship with Peter - if you feel like
you can wave him off without giving him anything I think it probably
makes sense.  During the campaign we have periodically let the Times put
hideously wrong stuff in the paper to teach them lessons about trusting
the wrong sources but that doesn't feel right for this particular story.

Please let me know how it turns out.  As you  know, Shalaigh and Balz
are also working on a big speculative transition piece which we aren't
cooperationg on either 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 7:13 PM
To: Anita Dunn
Subject: Peter baker

Is stalking me. Now wants to talk off the record to waive them off stuff
that's really wrong. Advice?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile