Subject: RE: Re-Convening
From: "Begala, Paul" <[email-masked]>
To: "Matthew Butler" <[email-masked]>, "Susan McCue" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "David Brock ([email-masked])" <[email-masked]>, "Tara McGuinness" <[email-masked]>, "Tom Matzzie" <[email-masked]>, "John Podesta" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 14:58:10 -0400

Sounds good.

________________________________

From: Matthew Butler [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 2:45 PM
To: Susan McCue
Cc: Begala, Paul; David Brock ([email-masked]); Tara McGuinness;
Tom Matzzie; John Podesta
Subject: Re: Re-Convening

Can I suggest trying a call at 10:00am?  

That time sounds like it works for those who have weighed in so far.
Paul, know you're getting on a train at that time so if you're a few
minutes late settling in that would be fine.  

David and John does that time work for you?

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Susan McCue <[email-masked]>
wrote:

	Let's do conf call

	From: Begala, Paul [mailto:[email-masked]] 
	Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 2:13 PM
	To: Matthew Butler; David Brock ([email-masked]); Tara
McGuinness; Tom Matzzie; Susan McCue; John Podesta
	Subject: RE: Re-Convening

	I will be traveling to NYC for CNN coverage of Oregon and
Kentucky tomorrow.  Am willing to call in if you think it would be
helpful.

________________________________

	From: Matthew Butler [mailto:[email-masked]] 
	Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 12:51 PM
	To: David Brock ([email-masked]); Tara McGuinness; Tom
Matzzie; Begala, Paul; Susan McCue; John Podesta
	Subject: Re-Convening

	We discussed reconvening tomorrow to continue Friday's
discussion and get updates on conversations that took place over the
weekend.  
	
	What times work for people? 
	
	Do people want to do this in person or is a call sufficient?