Subject: Re: Script review meeting in DC, January 24
From: "Begala, Paul" <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked], "Wallace, Laurelie" <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:22:34 -0500

Good point. That works for me. 

----- Original Message -----
From: [email-masked] <[email-masked]>
To: Wallace, Laurelie
Cc: Bryan Fisher <[email-masked]>; Susan McCue <[email-masked]>; Begala, Paul; [email-masked] <[email-masked]>; Stan Greenberg <[email-masked]>; Anna Greenberg <[email-masked]>; [email-masked] <[email-masked]>; [email-masked] <[email-masked]>; [email-masked] <[email-masked]>; [email-masked] <[email-masked]>
Sent: Thu Jan 17 00:00:37 2008
Subject: Re: Script review meeting in DC, January 24

If we move the meeting to the 25th we need everybody to read the
scripts on the 24th to give feedback.

On Jan 16, 2008 5:17 PM, Wallace, Laurelie <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> The afternoon of he 24th does not work for Paul either.  The 25th works for
> Paul as well.
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>
>
> From: Bryan Fisher [mailto:[email-masked]]
>  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 5:18 PM
>  To: Susan McCue; [email-masked]; Begala, Paul; [email-masked];
> Stan Greenberg; Anna Greenberg
>  Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> [email-masked]; Wallace, Laurelie; [email-masked]
>  Subject: RE: Script review meeting in DC, January 24
>
>
>
>
>
> The afternoon of the 24th really doesn't work for Stan. Perhaps we can do
> the morning of the 25th?  Anytime before 1:30p is fine on Friday January 25.
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>
>
> From: Susan McCue [mailto:[email-masked]]
>  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 5:04 PM
>  To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Susan McCue;
> [email-masked]; Stan Greenberg; Anna Greenberg
>  Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Bryan Fisher;
> [email-masked]
>  Subject: Re: Script review meeting in DC, January 24
>
>
>
> Aft of 24th better for me if it's 2 hours. Thx!
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: [email-masked] <[email-masked]>
>  To: Paul Begala <[email-masked]>; Susan McCue; John Podesta
> <[email-masked]>; Stan Greenberg <[email-masked]>; Anna
> Greenberg <[email-masked]>
>  Cc: Tara McGuinness <[email-masked]>; Zach Schwartz
> <[email-masked]>; [email-masked] <[email-masked]>;
> Wallace, Laurelie <[email-masked]>; Bryan Fisher
> <[email-masked]>; [email-masked] <[email-masked]>
>  Sent: Wed Jan 16 16:58:35 2008
>  Subject: Script review meeting in DC, January 24
>
>  Hi all, we need to schedule a two-hour in-person meeting next Thursday
>  January 24th in the afternoon to review and discuss scripts we'll be
>  getting back from media firms. This is in addition to our Monday,
>  11:00 AM call and anything else we schedule on an ad hoc basis.
>
>  Right now I think we're likely to hear back from: Murphy-Putnam,
>  Squier-Knapp-Dunn, Mark Armour, Deno Seder, Zimmerman/Markman, First
>  Tuesday, Matt Macwilliams and Will Robinson.
>
>  I'm still trying to close the loop with some other folks including
>  Group SJR, Devito/Verdi (I had a good convo with Ellis Verdi), McMahon
>  Squier Lapp and Associates, Dixon/Davis and GMMB. Susan, Paul and I
>  came up with a compensation proposal for this first phase and none of
>  the firms have balked at it yet.
>
>  I'm asking Ryan to work with folks to nail down a two-hour period to
>  focus on this in-person.
>
>  The firms were all wowed at the depth of our research, tracking and
>  polling to date. They were really impressed by our focus and
>  strategy--a hat tip to Tara, the HT researchers and the GQRR team.
>
>  thanks,
>
>  -Tom