Subject: David Brock is a liar which makes his candidate even more distrusted
From: Brent Budowsky <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 04:05:47 +0000

And I am probably going to write it soon.

The Bernie Sanders ad which I praised will be seen by voters all over Iowa and New Hampshire, who will see the many black faces in the ad, and prove the lie that David Brock tells in the name of Bill and Hillary Clinton.

I am not a big fan of lying in any event, but Brock, who insists on making Hillary's negative trust ratings even higher, tells a lie that everyone who watches the ad will know is a lie.

Brock makes the cardinal mistake of those who bring politics into disrepute with voters. He tells a lie that people will know is a lie, and insults the intelligence of black voters with a kind of elitist racism that Bill and Hillary Clinton should not be seen with.   I guess Brock's plan is that black voters are stupid and will not watch the ad and believe his lie, though Iowa voters---who do not appreciate this kind of low end politics----will love the ad and view Brock as offering the kind of politics that they detest.

I cannot think of anything more desperate, more stupid and more self-destructive than David Brock lying about the Bernie ad and playing a seamy brand of the politics of race using the tactic of deceit on her behalf.

Brock will lift attention to a great ad, helping the candidate he opposes, and further lower the trust rating of the candidate he supports, reminding people why they distrust her.

The Clinton campaign should produce a great ad of their won.  If you cannot do it, I will write the text of one for free.

The Clinton campaign did not respond to a New York Times inquiry about Brock's comments?

Here is the proper response:  the Brock comments are crap and unworthy of her campaign.  

Sent from my iPad