Subject: Fwd: PRESS INQ: FW: WashPost editorial query
From: Brian Fallon <[email-masked]>
To: John Podesta <[email-masked]>, Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]>, Robby Mook <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:42:12 -0400

Fyi

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Jesse Ferguson* <[email-masked]>
Date: Monday, June 15, 2015
Subject: PRESS INQ: FW: WashPost editorial query
To: HRCRR <[email-masked]>, Maya Harris <
[email-masked]>, Ann O'Leary <[email-masked]>

Wapo Editorial likely to hit HRC on TPP/TPA/TradeSoup.

*From:* Lane, Chuck [mailto:[email-masked]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[email-masked]');>]
*Sent:* Monday, June 15, 2015 12:50 PM
*To:* [email-masked]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[email-masked]');>
*Cc:* [email-masked]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[email-masked]');>
*Subject:* WashPost editorial query

Hi Brian,

We are taking on the issues raised by Sec. Clinton’s comments re trade over
the weekend, from our well-established vantage point as strong supporters
of TPA.

Our main concerns are:

1)      The apparent discrepancy between her comments in Des Moines and her
oft-stated view as secretary that TPP was in America’s interest.

2)      The fact that the issue before House Democrats is not TPP but TPA,
and that she is not squarely addressing that – i.e., the fact that
President Obama can’t negotiate the strongest possible deal as she
suggests, without TPA.

Your thoughts? By 430 p.m. please.

Thanks,

Charles Lane

Editorial Writer

Washington Post

202-334-7330

202-425-8860

@chucklane1

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"HRCRR" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email-masked]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[email-masked]');>.
To post to this group, send email to [email-masked]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[email-masked]');>.