Subject: Re: PRESS INQ: FW: WashPost editorial query
From: Brian Fallon <[email-masked]>
To: Jennifer Palmieri <[email-masked]>
Cc: John Podesta <[email-masked]>, Robby Mook <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:27:37 -0400

Jake spoke to Chuck Lane. It didnt go so well.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Jennifer Palmieri <
[email-masked]> wrote:

> I would ask jake to talk with them.  There are legitimate answers to these
> questions.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 15, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Brian Fallon <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
>
> Fyi
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Jesse Ferguson* <[email-masked]>
> Date: Monday, June 15, 2015
> Subject: PRESS INQ: FW: WashPost editorial query
> To: HRCRR <[email-masked]>, Maya Harris <
> [email-masked]>, Ann O'Leary <[email-masked]>
>
>
> Wapo Editorial likely to hit HRC on TPP/TPA/TradeSoup.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lane, Chuck [mailto:[email-masked]]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 15, 2015 12:50 PM
> *To:* [email-masked]
> *Cc:* [email-masked]
> *Subject:* WashPost editorial query
>
>
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> We are taking on the issues raised by Sec. Clinton’s comments re trade
> over the weekend, from our well-established vantage point as strong
> supporters of TPA.
>
> Our main concerns are:
>
> 1)      The apparent discrepancy between her comments in Des Moines and
> her oft-stated view as secretary that TPP was in America’s interest.
>
> 2)      The fact that the issue before House Democrats is not TPP but
> TPA, and that she is not squarely addressing that – i.e., the fact that
> President Obama can’t negotiate the strongest possible deal as she
> suggests, without TPA.
>
> Your thoughts? By 430 p.m. please.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Charles Lane
>
> Editorial Writer
>
> Washington Post
>
> 202-334-7330
>
> 202-425-8860
>
> @chucklane1
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "HRCRR" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email-masked].
> To post to this group, send email to [email-masked].
>
>