Subject: Correct The Record Saturday October 4, 2014 Roundup
From: Burns Strider <[email-masked]>
To: CTRFriendsFamily <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 12:25:36 -0400
List-Id: <CTRFriendsFamily.americanbridge.org>

*​**Correct The Record Saturday October 4, 2014 Roundup:*

*Headlines:*

*Associated Press: “Clinton plans midterm campaign push for Democrats”
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/03fe478acd0344bab983323d3fb353e2/clinton-planning-lengthy-campaign-push-month>*

“Hillary Rodham Clinton is lending her name and support to a half-dozen key
midterm races for the Senate and several for governor as she considers
another White House bid in 2016.”

*McClatchy Washington Bureau: “Two years out, poll shows Hillary Clinton’s
the 2016 favorite”
<http://www.heraldonline.com/2014/10/03/6387445_two-years-out-poll-shows-hillary.html?sp=/100/104/422/115/&rh=1>*

“Hillary Clinton has a comfortable lead among Democrats for the 2016
presidential nomination, while the Republican race remains a free-for-all,
according to a new McClatchy-Marist poll.”

*Washington Post: “Supporting actors in 2014 election cycle already
thinking about 2016”
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supporting-actors-in-2014-election-cycle-already-thinking-about-2016/2014/10/03/c76886c0-4a3f-11e4-b72e-d60a9229cc10_story.html>*

“This week two big names from previous presidential contests — Democrat
Hillary Rodham Clinton and Republican Mitt Romney — launched aggressive,
multi-state tours in other parts of the country.”

*MSNBC: “Bernie Sanders giving pro-Clinton Democrat ‘nightmares’”
<http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-giving-pro-clinton-democrat-nightmares>*

“‘I have nightmares that someone like a Bernie Saunders will catch fire and
cause trouble for Hillary Clinton. People sometimes ignore who the most
electable candidate is and which candidate is best prepared to lead the
country in favor of the fun of being a contrarian in the moment,’ said one
pro-Clinton Democratic operative, who asked to remain anonymous to speak
candidly.”

*Salon: “Is Bernie Sanders really all there is? Lessons from Pat
Robertson’s insurgency”
<http://www.salon.com/2014/10/04/is_bernie_sanders_really_all_there_is_lessons_from_pat_robertsons_insurgency/>*

[Subtitle:] “If Warren sits 2016 out, an unelectable longshot may be
liberals' only hope. Let's take a lesson from Pat Robertson”

*Washington Post: “Téa Leoni knows what you’re thinking when you see her on
‘Madam Secretary’”
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/tv/tea-leoni-knows-what-youre-thinking-when-you-see-her-on-madam-secretary/2014/10/03/9fa2570c-4a4d-11e4-b72e-d60a9229cc10_story.html>*

“She explains that while she understands the Clinton comparisons, she hopes
people can still separate the two. ‘I guess there has to be that, because
she’s a really smart, really charming, really dynamic woman…’”

*Articles:*

*Associated Press: “Clinton plans midterm campaign push for Democrats”
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/03fe478acd0344bab983323d3fb353e2/clinton-planning-lengthy-campaign-push-month>*

By Ken Thomas

October 3, 2014, 4:15 p.m. EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hillary Rodham Clinton is lending her name and support to
a half-dozen key midterm races for the Senate and several for governor as
she considers another White House bid in 2016.

Clinton plans to campaign for Senate candidates Iowa, New Hampshire, North
Carolina, Colorado, Georgia and Kentucky. She also intends to help out
gubernatorial campaigns in Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and
Illinois.

Her travels will also take her to California, where she will headline a
fundraiser for Senate Democrats on Oct. 20, the same day as a San Francisco
event for House Democrats with Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi.

The former secretary of state has said she expects to decide her political
future around the beginning of 2015, but the campaign travel before the
midterm elections will help her connect with Democratic partisans, donors
and voters who could fuel a second White House race. Along with her
husband, former President Bill Clinton, the former New York senator is the
most sought-after fundraiser and surrogate for Democrats this year in a
challenging political climate.

Some of the dates and events, which were first reported by Politico, are
still being finalized. But Clinton's schedule will take her across a
competitive Senate landscape for Democrats seeking to maintain their
majority during President Barack Obama's final two years. And it will
inject her into governor's races featuring a slate of longtime allies and
early presidential states with a special appeal to female voters.

"There is no one better at connecting with working women," said Paul
Begala, a Democratic strategist who advised Bill Clinton.

The former first lady kicked off her campaign season in Iowa, appearing at
the annual steak fry fundraiser for retiring Sen. Tom Harkin in September.
She expects to make a second trip to Iowa before the election.

In a bookend of sorts, Clinton plans to return to New Hampshire on Nov. 2 —
two days before the election — to drum up support for Gov. Maggie Hassan
and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen. The state often pivots on the support of female
voters, and Clinton's appearance there could help drive up turnout.

Clinton has not been back to the nation's first presidential primary state
since October 2008 but she has maintained strong ties to Democrats there,
who helped her stage a comeback victory over Obama in the 2008 primary and
have long backed her husband. Mrs. Clinton appeared at a New York
fundraiser for Shaheen earlier this week.

The Los Angeles fundraiser on Oct. 20 will re-connect her with Jeffrey
Katzenberg, the head of Dreamworks Animation and a major Democratic donor.
The dinner for Senate Democrats will be organized by Andy Spahn, a
consultant who worked with Katzenberg to raise millions for Obama's
campaigns in 2008 and 2012.

Governor's races will also get her attention. Clinton stopped in Miami on
Thursday to help Charlie Crist, the ex-Republican Florida governor who is
now competing for his old job as a Democrat. Crist and GOP Gov. Rick Scott
have tangled in one of the nation's most competitive governor's races,
which could be a dry run for a 2016 battle in the nation's premier swing
state.

On Wednesday, Clinton plans to be in Chicago, close to the suburban
community where she was raised, to help Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn, one of the
most vulnerable Democratic governors in the nation. On Thursday, she will
raise money in New York City for Arkansas Sen. Mark Pryor, a top target for
Republicans in Bill Clinton's home state, and attend a women's event in
Philadelphia for Tom Wolf, who is favored to defeat Republican Gov. Tom
Corbett in Pennsylvania.

Other events are planned to help vulnerable Sens. Kay Hagan in North
Carolina and Mark Udall in Colorado and Senate candidates Bruce Braley in
Iowa, Alison Lundergan Grimes in Kentucky and Michelle Nunn in Georgia.
Clinton is also expected to help Martha Coakley, the Massachusetts attorney
general running for governor, and Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., a longtime ally.

*McClatchy Washington Bureau: “Two years out, poll shows Hillary Clinton’s
the 2016 favorite”
<http://www.heraldonline.com/2014/10/03/6387445_two-years-out-poll-shows-hillary.html?sp=/100/104/422/115/&rh=1>*

By David Lightman

October 3, 2014

WASHINGTON — Hillary Clinton has a comfortable lead among Democrats for the
2016 presidential nomination, while the Republican race remains a
free-for-all, according to a new McClatchy-Marist poll.

Clinton was the top choice of 64 percent of Democrats and
Democratic-leaning independents. She showed strong appeal among virtually
every demographic and political group.

“She’s jogging around the track with no serious competition,” said Lee
Miringoff, director of the Marist Institute for Public Opinion in New York,
which conducted the Sept. 24-29 poll.

A former secretary of state, U.S. senator from New York and first lady,
Clinton has been a front-runner before. In 2008 she was doing well at this
early stage, but she lost the nomination to Barack Obama, then a Democratic
senator from Illinois.

She had shown a hint of vulnerability this summer during her tour to
promote her memoir, “Hard Choices.” Clinton was hurt by her assertion that
she and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, were “dead broke” after
leaving the White House in 2001 because of mortgages and daughter Chelsea’s
college tuition.

Since then, Clinton has been campaigning for 2014 candidates. Last month
she visited Iowa, traditionally the nation’s first presidential caucus
state. Clinton got a warm greeting from thousands of people gathered at an
Indianola farm, where she said she was thinking about running.

Many at that event said they wanted to hear from other candidates, but the
poll shows that no other Democrats have so far caught on. Vice President
Joe Biden was a distant second at 15 percent, followed by Massachusetts
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who has said repeatedly she does not want to be a
candidate, at 8 percent.

Three who may be interested in waging campaigns trailed far behind. Sen.
Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who held town meetings in Iowa at the
same time Clinton was visiting, polled 4 percent. Maryland Gov. Martin
O’Malley recorded 2 percent, and former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb was at 1
percent.

Clinton also did well against potential Republican challengers, topping 50
percent in each instance.

She led New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, whose appeal to moderate voters
could make him formidable, by 51 percent to 42 percent, up from 47 percent
to 41 percent in August.

Clinton did better against former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, winning 53 percent
to 42 percent, up from 7 percentage points in August. She tops Kentucky
Sen. Rand Paul 52 percent to 43 percent, up from 6 points in August. Paul
has been aggressively traveling to key presidential states and has been
particularly active in Iowa.

Former President George W. Bush, Jeb’s brother, said earlier this week, “I
think he wants to be president,” but he does not believe his brother’s made
a decision.

Jeb Bush led the Republican field, but there was no discernible trend for
or against anyone. Bush got 15 percent backing, followed by Paul and 2012
vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, both at 13 percent.
Christie was at 12 percent.

A long list of potentially strong candidates trailed: Texas Gov. Rick
Perry, 7 percent; Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, 6 percent; Texas Sen. Ted Cruz
and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, tied at 4 percent; former Pennsylvania
Sen. Rick Santorum and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, 3 percent each.

Twenty-one percent were undecided.

“That’s the most popular option,” noted Miringoff.

The telephone survey polled 1,052 adults, including 884 registered voters.
The poll has an overall margin of error of 3 percentage points. The margin
is 3.3 percentage points among registered voters.

*Washington Post: “Supporting actors in 2014 election cycle already
thinking about 2016”
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supporting-actors-in-2014-election-cycle-already-thinking-about-2016/2014/10/03/c76886c0-4a3f-11e4-b72e-d60a9229cc10_story.html>*

By Ed O’Keefe

October 3, 2014, 12:00 p.m. EDT

More than a month is left in the 2014 campaign season, but many candidates
already seem to be moving on to the next one.

A host of Democrats and Republicans thinking about a presidential run in
2016 spent this week visiting diners, speaking at fundraisers and touring
college campuses with the hope that the midterm candidates they are helping
will return the favor in two years.

States that hold the earliest presidential primaries and caucuses are
earning special attention. At least 10 would-be GOP candidates have visited
Iowa or are coming soon, according to one tally. South Carolina Gov. Nikki
Haley has deputized at least seven out-of-state Republicans for her
reelection campaign, aides said. The visits to New Hampshire are so
frequent that a list maintained by local Republicans counts nearly 50
events with potential presidential contenders in attendance in the past 15
months.

Neil Levesque, executive director of the New Hampshire Institute of
Politics & Political Library, noted that even obscure political figures are
visiting the state, which will have the first primary in 2016.

“George Pataki is coming in late October,” he said.

The former New York governor is one of several blasts from the political
past in the mix. Former Republican governors Jim Gilmore of Virginia and
Bob Ehrlich of Maryland also have New Hampshire on their schedules. So does
former senator Jim Webb (D-Va.), who will visit this month to help Sen.
Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.).

“The very best excuse for you to come into New Hampshire without declaring
that you’re running for president is to say ‘Aww shucks, I’m just trying to
help the Democratic or Republican candidate,’ ” Levesque said.

This week two big names from previous presidential contests — Democrat
Hillary Rodham Clinton and Republican Mitt Romney — launched aggressive,
multi-state tours in other parts of the country.

Clinton appeared at a closed-door fundraiser in the Miami area Thursday night
for Florida’s Democratic gubernatorial candidate Charlie Crist. She’ll stop
next week in Chicago to campaign for Gov. Pat Quinn. (The visits to both
cities also include paid speeches to private groups and plans to sign
copies of her new memoir.)

On Friday, Clinton’s campaign-in-waiting unveiled more details about her
forthcoming schedule that include stops nationwide to boost House, Senate
and gubernatorial candidates.

She’ll attend a fundraiser for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee
in California on Oct. 20, the same day that she’s attending a fundraiser —
to benefit women running for Congress — with House Minority Leader Nancy
Pelosi (D-Calif.). Party officials familiar with her plans say Clinton
intends to campaign in Colorado, Georgia, Iowa, New Hampshire and North
Carolina for Democratic Senate candidates and help the Democratic
gubernatorial candidates in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. News of her
plans was first reported by Politico.

Romney, who told the New York Times this week that “we’ll see what happens”
about a possible rerun in 2016, is in the middle of a a five-day tour
through six states. Romney spent Thursday campaigning with Senate Minority
Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) at a horse farm in Lexington.

And there are many more: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie will rally Friday with
fellow Republicans in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, a day after visiting Arizona for
the state’s GOP gubernatorial candidate. Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Sen.
Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) will be in New Hampshire next week. Sen. Rand Paul
(R-Ky.) visited two colleges in South Carolina on Tuesdaybefore traveling
to North Carolina on Wednesday to campaign with Senate candidate Thom
Tillis.

Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) is also weighing his options. He campaigned this
week for Joni Ernst, the GOP candidate hoping to succeed retiring Sen. Tom
Harkin (D-Iowa).

“After the election, I am going to have serious discussions with people I
respect and look at the field,” Portman said in an interview with The
Washington Post while traveling in Iowa.

After Clinton, Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley maintains the most aggressive
schedule among potential Democratic candidates. He appeared at the
Congressional Hispanic Caucus gala Thursday night in Washington and
recently has made stops in several states.

In South Carolina, the Democratic Party announced Thursday that Vice
President Biden will visit Oct. 14 for a voter registration event. Then
there’s Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a self-described socialist, who is
thinking about running for president as a Democrat.

Sanders is having a town hall meeting Friday at the University of New
Hampshire before flying to Iowa to headline a Johnson County Democratic
Party barbecue two days later.

Levesque, who has tracked New Hampshire politics for years, said it’s
difficult to compare the current political travel to previous cycles.

“This cycle has such an open field on the Republican side that there are so
many candidates who say ‘Gee, with a few points, I can be pretty close to
the bunch,’ ” he said. “It’s so spread out and there’s no preconceived
front-runner.”

Kevin Madden, a top aide on Romney’s 2012 campaign, said party leaders with
national profiles are always in high demand among candidates looking to
make waves in the closing weeks of a campaign.

“What we’ve seen less of this cycle, though, is a more obvious effort to
use these [visits] as a way to build a turnkey presidential campaign
operation,” he wrote in an e-mail. “During the 2006 and 2010 mid-term
cycles, there were more advanced and aggressive build-out efforts by
prospective candidates.”

Ross Baker, a Rutgers University professor of U.S. politics and the
presidency, said he fears that the legislative process in Washington is
suffering with so many lawmakers relentlessly focused on presidential
politics.

“This is the permanent campaign in the purest sense. The complete
folding-in of the legislative process to campaigning is virtually
complete,” he said. “Everything on the floor of the House and Senate is
about messaging. They don’t legislate, they message. The line between
governing and campaigning is pretty much dissolved.”

Last month, Congress made its earliest exit from Capitol Hill to the
campaign trail in nearly five decades. The early departure was designed to
give embattled incumbents more time to meet with voters — and to allow
A-list party figures to help new recruits.

A handful of congressional candidates in early primary states have earned
outsize attention from the potential 2016 field. Republican Scott Brown,
the former Massachusetts senator hoping to unseat Shaheen, will be joined
on the campaign trail next week by Rubio. He has already appeared with
Romney and Paul. Marilinda Garcia, a Republican trying to unseat Rep. Annie
Kuster (D-N.H.), has been visited by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) and also will
get Rubio’s help next week.

In South Carolina, Haley has been backed up by Christie, Perry, Rubio,
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal. Jeb Bush, the
former Florida governor, is visiting in a few weeks, aides say. Paul and
Cruz have also made visits to help South Carolina Republicans.

Few if any have received as much help as Ernst. She has been visited by at
least nine top GOP figures, including Romney and Rubio, who were early
supporters; Jindal, who has made three visits on her behalf; Indiana Gov.
Mike Pence; and New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte, who could be a 2016 vice
presidential contender.

Perry has done the most legwork by far in Iowa. He has campaigned for
Ernst, and a tally by the Des Moines Register found that he has campaigned
for 16 other GOP candidates and helped raise money for at least 17 county
Republican organizations.

Ernst’s opponent, Rep. Bruce Braley (D-Iowa), is also being helped by
out-of-state Democrats. Bill and Hillary Clinton attended an annual
fundraising event hosted by Harkin at which Braley appeared. Webb did
surrogate events for Braley in late August. O’Malley has helped Braley
raise money and deployed some of his political staffers to the state.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) — who many liberal Democrats would like to
see run for president — hasn’t shown up for Braley in person but helped out
via e-mail. “We’re in a tough battle to keep the Senate majority — and I’m
doing everything I can between now and November to fight for it,” she wrote
in a message to his supporters.

*MSNBC: “Bernie Sanders giving pro-Clinton Democrat ‘nightmares’”
<http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-giving-pro-clinton-democrat-nightmares>*

By Alex Seitz-Wald

October 4, 2014, 9:25 a.m. EDT

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is pressing ahead with a potential White House
bid, returning to Iowa and New Hampshire this week for more events in the
early presidential states.

He’ll be in Davenport, Iowa on Saturday for a meeting with local activists
on the economy, before heading to Iowa City on Sunday to headline the
Johnson County Democratic Party barbecue. That night, he keynotes a meeting
of Iowa Citizen Action Network in Coralville.

On Friday, he heads to New Hampshire for a town hall meeting with students
at the University of New Hampshire in Durham.

Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, is openly considering
a long-shot presidential run. In private meetings with prominent
progressive activists this summer, the senator’s advisers said he is
leaning heavily towards running, according to people familiar with the
meetings.

The aides said he’s most likely to run for president as a Democrat, with a
small chance of him running as a independent, and an equally small chance
of him staying out of 2016 entirely.

While most dismiss Sanders’ chances, even some supporting Hillary Clinton
are concerned he could find unexpected success against the more
establishment Democrat.

“I have nightmares that someone like a Bernie Saunders will catch fire and
cause trouble for Hillary Clinton. People sometimes ignore who the most
electable candidate is and which candidate is best prepared to lead the
country in favor of the fun of being a contrarian in the moment,” said one
pro-Clinton Democratic operative, who asked to remain anonymous to speak
candidly.

Bill Gluba, the mayor of Davenport and a longtime Iowa Democratic activist
who got onboard early with Barack Obama in 2008, has met with Sanders this
year and said there’s “a real hunger” among the grassroots for a candidate
willing to take on Wall Street and the 1%.

“He’s about the only one really clearly speaking to the real issues,” said
Gluba, who has not yet committed to anyone.

“Bernie’s already starting to get traction in Iowa,” the mayor continued,
guessing that if the election were held today, Sanders could capture about
a quarter of the vote. “This thing is wide open – you can say it isn’t, but
just you wait.”

Last month in New Hampshire, the local chapters of the AFL-CIO and SEIU
invited Sanders to headline their annual Labor Day Breakfast, where he got
a warm reception from union members.

Clinton won that state in during her last presidential and is currently
almost 50 percentage points ahead of her nearest competitor. In the most
recent poll, from CNN/ORC, Sen. Elizabeth Warren comes in a distant second
at 11%, Vice President Joe Biden follows at 8%, and then its Sanders at 7%.

That puts him ahead of Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, who is diligently
laying the groundwork for a run, and within the margin of error for second.
Warren, from nearby Massachusetts, has repeatedly said she is not running
in 2016.

In Iowa, where Obama unexpectedly routed Clinton  in the state’s kickoff
caucuses in 2008, the situation is largely the same. The former secretary
of state is a bit weaker in the Hawkeye State that she is in New Hampshire,
but still overwhelming strong. Sanders gets 5% of support, according to the
CNN/ORC poll.

Jerry Crawford, an Iowa Democratic powerbroker who was Hillary Clinton’s
Midwest co-Chair in 2008 and is involved with the pro-Clinton Ready for
Hillary super PAC, said he could see Sanders finding modest support in the
state.

“In any caucus state, including Iowa, candidates on the philosophical
fringes will still get plenty of support. The caucuses are made to order
for those folks,” he told msnbc.

Another longtime Clinton aide compared a possible Sanders presidential bid
to Jesse Jackson’s twin runs in the 1980s. jackson, who captured enough to
support to credibly raise issue that were important to him, was never a
real threat.

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, who has worked with Sanders in their
shared home state for years, and who run a left-leaning presidential
campaign in 2008 fueled by the Democratic base, is backing Clinton.

But in a recent appearance on MSNBC’s Up! With Steve Kornacki, he added
that Sanders would be a good challenger for Clinton. “He does not do dirty
politics. He sticks to the issues, and the issues are important that he’s
raising for the country, not just the Democratic Party,” the former
Democratic Party chair said.

*Salon: “Is Bernie Sanders really all there is? Lessons from Pat
Robertson’s insurgency”
<http://www.salon.com/2014/10/04/is_bernie_sanders_really_all_there_is_lessons_from_pat_robertsons_insurgency/>*

By Paul Rosenberg

October 4, 2014, 8:00 a.m. EDT

[Subtitle:] If Warren sits 2016 out, an unelectable longshot may be
liberals' only hope. Let's take a lesson from Pat Robertson

With the 2016 elections still two years away, and Elizabeth Warren saying
that she will not run, the most likely challenger on the left appears to
Bernie Sanders, the independent Vermont socialist, re-elected with 71
percent of the vote in 2012, who caucuses with the Democrats. Forget the
White House, some critics would say: Sanders doesn’t even have a shot at
giving Hillary a strong primary challenge, should he choose to run as a
Democrat, so why bother?

The answer is easy: 1988.  That year, not one, but two long-shot outsider
primary campaigns had profound impacts on American politics: Jesse Jackson
on the left, and Pat Robertson on the right. As Sanders actively tests the
waters, the question of just how to make the most of the opportunity is
both timely and important.

“It’s unlikely that Senator Sanders would win the presidential election in
2016,” said Darcy Burner, former executive director of the House
Progressive Caucus.  But, she added quickly, “A Bernie Sanders run could
make a big difference in terms of changing the national conversation if
it’s done right, and if the activists on the left focus on it.

“One of the key tactics the political status quo uses to maintain the
existing balance of power is to distract people with false binary choices
about key problems facing the country. For instance: should we cut Social
Security now or later?” Burner said.  “People assume that because those are
the choices they hear, then those must be the only choices. This tactic is
used across every policy area.”

For years, along these same lines, the Progressive Caucus has developed a
People’s Budget, solidly aligned with supermajority views of the American
people — protecting Social Security and Medicare, for example — which the
donor-class-dominated political media routinely ignores, even though those
budgets have also done a better job of bringing budget deficits down than
the various more prominent proposals.  Sanders has been the one consistent
voice in the Senate supporting the People’s Budget — a strong indication of
what Burner sees in his potential candidacy.

“If we want to change the conversation, we have to stop being distracted by
the false framing handed to us by those in power and instead start
discussing the actual range of choices we face,” Burner said. “Senator
Sanders has a long history of seeing past the false choices and presenting
clearly what our real choices are. By default, the media will try to avoid
covering him: he’s unlikely to win and the things he says are outside of
their comfort zone. So the key challenge to the left is to do whatever it
takes to get people to actually hear what he’s saying.”

Amplifying Sanders’ voice, and demanding that others respond to it, will be
key, Burner went on to say: “It means making a conscious decision to build
a grassroots loudspeaker for the things he talks about. And it means
deciding to ignore the defenders of the status quo calling us fringe and
crazy, because when they can’t attack our ideas, they switch to character
assassination every time.”

Returning to the examples of 1988, on the Democratic side, Jesse Jackson’s
shoestring campaign nonetheless came in second, winning 29 percent of the
primary votes, compared to 42 percent gained by the nominee, Michael
Dukakis. He registered large numbers of low-income and minority voters, and
reshaped delegate selections rules — both factors that helped Barack Obama
win the nomination 20 years later.

But on the Republican side, a far less successful campaign had an even
greater long-term impact. Pat Robertson came in a distant third, gaining
just 9 percent of primary votes compared to 68 percent for the nominee,
George H.W. Bush, yet Roberston used the mailing lists gathered by his
campaign to establish the Christian Coalition, which proceeded to take over
much of GOP’s state-level infrastructure in the following decade.

Progressive strategist Mike Lux has co-founded more groups than most folks
are members of, while also playing a leadership role in five presidential
campaigns and writing “The Progressive Revolution: How the Best in America
Came to Be.“ Lux has a much higher opinion of Warren’s chances should she
choose to run against Hillary —“It would be a big fight for the nomination,
and I think Elizabeth could win that,” he said — but he doesn’t see her
getting in the race. Warren represents one end of the spectrum of possible
challenges, Lux said. “At the other end of the spectrum there’s a sort of
Kucinich-style candidacies, which make no ripples, have a lasting impact,
as far as I can tell, maybe other people have a different perspective.”
Sanders would fall in the middle. “I love him dearly, but he’s kind of got
that grumpy old man kind of persona; he’s sort of the John McCain of the
left,” Lux said.

Still, Lux sees the opportunity for a Robertson-style impact as a real
possibility. “If you’re going to support Bernie Sanders you should be
thinking how do we use this to build long-term, and I think building an
organization out of it is something that’s worth doing and would add to the
progressive infrastructure.”

We can all agree with Lux that Sanders isn’t as charismatic as Jesse
Jackson, but Robertson’s example remains relevant — particularly given how
out of touch our current broken political system has become, and how widely
people feel it. Much has changed since 1988, so it’s not about repeating
old formulas. But it is about asking the right set of questions — questions
of messaging, organizing, attitude, relationship to history and more …
questions that ultimately add up to “What does he need to run a campaign
that could renew the promise of America?”  These are clearly worthwhile
questions to be asked, not just by Sanders and his advisors, but by all
those who might join in supporting him, to help change the trajectory of
American politics.

Even for those still hoping Elizabeth Warren will change her mind, the
question of how to have a long-term impact should be crucial — in terms of
institution-building, advancing ideas, altering the framing of debates, and
focusing attention on key generational issues.

When it comes to issues, Zephyr Teachout, who just ran a strong low-budget
primary campaign against Wall Street-friendly New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo,
had no doubt what they should be — although she’s still hoping more
candidates will come forward.

“It’s a trust-busting moment,” Teachout said, “It is waiting to be grabbed
on to. … When you get into a room, it’s what people are experiencing.”
Massively outspent, with the Democratic Party establishment aligned against
her, Teachout nonetheless won 34 percent of the vote and carried half of
New York’s 62 counties, a solid sign that she’s onto something — and others
have agreed.

“Sanders will lay out an agenda that challenges the shibboleths of American
politics on Wall Street, on trade, on taxes, on public investment,” said
Robert Borosage, founder and president of the Institute for America’s
Future and co-director of its sister organization, the Campaign for
America’s Future. “A lot of that agenda is relatively new for the
progressive movements of the last decade, most of which focused more on
social issues and much less on economics.”

Without actually committing to run, Sanders effectively confirmed this view
in a recent Salon interview, when he laid out the high points of policy
agenda to reverse America’s growing inequality and rebuild the middle
class. First, raise the minimum wage to a living wage. Second, put
Americans back to work with a trillion dollar investment in rebuilding our
crumbling infrastructure, which would create 13 million decent-paying jobs.
Third, create “a trade system that works for working people and not just
corporate America.”  Those are the first three items, he said. Then add tax
reform, so the wealthy and large corporations pay their fair share, and
making college affordable, while relieving student debt. That won’t solve
everything, Sanders acknowledged, but it would go “a good way” toward
rebuilding the middle class, and getting the wealthy to pay their fair
share.

As a result, Borosage argued, a Sanders campaign could greatly benefit
progressives by advancing a debate on these issues. “One of the big
opportunities that debate offers is the ability to educate our own
activists with an argument and an agenda that many are not comfortable
with,” he said. “I would say that what the right does better than we do is
that they teach their activists the words of the songs, so they all know
the scripture; they all know the verse they are supposed to be reciting,” —
something that’s rarely true for progressives, “particularly on economic
issues, were progressives are often confused and all over the place.”

Another thing the right seems to do better is make their values seem
patriotic, all-American; and Teachout sees a real opportunity here as well.
“Taking on trust-busting is one of the oldest traditions, American
traditions. Jefferson wanted an anti-monopoly clause in the Constitution,
and it was big part of our tradition until 1980, when Reagan eviscerated
our antitrust division.”  Teddy Roosevelt and FDR were two other historical
figures that she called on in her campaign.

“They’re still powerful with people,” Teachout said. “A nation is like a
person. We want to call on our better instincts, knowing that we’ve been
able to call them before, instead of disdaining our past. It’s very
powerful to people.”

In a similar vein, it also helps that Sanders knows very well that he’s
representing supermajority positions on some of his most crucial issues, as
he pointed out in his interview:

I helped lead the fight to stop the cuts in Social Security, along with
some others. I would say, 70-to-80 percent of the American people agree
with me. I believe we should raise the minimum wage. I would say 70 percent
of the American people agree with that. I’ve been very active in the fight
to overturn Citizens United. I would say, again, 70 percent of the people
agree with that. I am active in the fight to address the crisis of climate
change. I wouldn’t say 70 percent of the people agree with that, but a
pretty strong majority do.

Few, if any, national politicians are as confident and comfortable as
Sanders in taking these highly popular, but hated-by-big-donor positions.
Beyond educating activists, a Sanders campaign could get them similarly
comfortable, as well, which is often crucial in building face-to-face,
on-the-ground organizing effectiveness.

Still, there are differing views on what Sanders’ issue focus and related
strategy should be.  Most agree that economics should be key, but differ on
what the specific key issues should be — or even if they can wisely be
chosen in advance.  Economist Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for
Economic Policy Research, suggests an issue strategy designed to sharply
challenge Hillary Clinton, but with broader general election appeal as well.

“The best thing that Sanders can do is to raise two or three big issues and
keep hitting on them,” Baker said — a view echoed by others, such as
Borosage. “An obvious one would be foreign policy where he can appear to
ally with Obama against Clinton. After Clinton took issue with Obama’s line
about ‘don’t do stupid things.’ Seems to invite the obvious comeback;
President Obama said that we shouldn’t do stupid things, and Secretary
Clinton disagreed. He can then add that the debate is about judgment. She
has repeatedly exercised bad judgment, most obviously on the decision to go
to war with Iraq.” Baker sees “a huge amount of potential here that would
have an impact with both the Democratic base and the public at large,”
noting that “Most people are not into big interventions everywhere.”

Domestically, Baker suggests a two-pronged attack. First, “He should be
going after the health care industry. He can tout the ACA — he was an early
and active supporter — but then say why it’s necessary to go further to
rein in costs. In this respect he can point to Vermont’s plans for
single-payer. He can also talk about reining in the drug industry.”

Second, Baker said, “He should beat up on the financial sector. This is big
money for her [Hillary], so she has to be careful.” There are several
different facets to this, Baker elaborated. “He can talk about reducing the
bloat with a tax as even the I.M.F. has advocated. He can also talk about
downsizing the too-big-to-fail banks. The I.M.F. estimated their implicit
subsidy at $50 billion a year. (G.A.O. thought otherwise.) And he can talk
about appointing people to the Fed who are committed to full employment
rather than slamming the brakes on the economy every time workers start to
get a share of the benefits of growth.”  Then he added, “Making the Fed an
issue could be huge.”

Dave Johnson, who blogs for Campaign for America’s Future, views a
potential Sanders run somewhat differently.  On the one hand, he
acknowledges there’s a real concern about “a chance of weakening Democrats
in the general election, and thereby enabling/increasing the right’s
destructive power.” On the other hand, he sees strong positive potential in
a Sanders run.

“I’d use Zephyr Teachout getting 35 percent with no funding as a starting
point for making a groundswell argument.  Also, that we should not have
predetermined assumptions about what policies Hillary will push for,”
Johnson said.  In short, he thinks both Sanders and Clinton could surprise
us.

“It might be that Teachout shows we need a primary fight. Turnout is an
issue, and just letting Hillary coast into a nomination might lead to low
turnout with that 35 percent that supported Zephyr not bothering. A primary
would sharpen things, and maybe sharpen her ability to rally people, should
she win the primary.”

But that’s not a foregone conclusion, in Johnson’s mind. “I think people
should not underestimate Sanders,” he said. “Bernie is not Kucinich. He is
not fringy, which in my opinion Kucinich lent himself to. Sanders is an
experienced, respected U.S. senator with accomplishments and a real
understanding of the power structures — from the inside. In my opinion he
would make a capable president. And he understands how to develop much more
and wider support.” This last point is pivotal. As Johnson noted, Sanders
only garnered 1 percent support when he first ran for office in Vermont in
the 1970s, compared to 71 percent when last re-elected to the Senate in
2012.

“I think if he were showing signs of gathering popular support, he could
develop the funding and support to make a real run for it,” Johnson said.
“Would that hand the presidency to the corporate right? I don’t know — and
to me that is the greatest concern for the world right now.”

But that’s not the only concern. “Would Hillary hand the country to the
corporate right if elected?” Johnson continued. “I also don’t know.”

So a serious primary fight could really make a difference, even if Hillary
won as expected.  Key to this would be long-term institution-building — the
crucial role that unions played in FDR’s era, and the only reason that
Robertson’s 1988 campaign had any lasting impact.  “It takes a significant
national structure to run for President. You have to have existing
institutional power behind you,” Johnson said. “Lay the foundation now.
That has to be our goal. Institutional strength. And that should be the
message we get out there. We have to build up a small-donor base to tap
into (Dean and Obama) but also the national people connections.”

“Progressives still have not laid out a 10-year, 20-year plan,” Johnson
stressed. “One thing the Christian right did was start a farm team of
candidates locally so they could rise up. Of course, they had the funding
base for that. They had Weyrich out there building institutional power and
funding. … The goal of a Sanders campaign should be to build that. It
should be the purpose from the start, to get going on a 10-year, 20-year
plan.”

Naturally, progressives will never be able to match the right
dollar-for-dollar, but with popular policies that people actually want,
that’s never been the goal. We need enough to be heard. They need enough to
drown us out. Johnson had an immediate example in mind. “I think the
shortage of acknowledgement that there was a 300,000-400,000 person march
in New York with adjunct marches around the world this weekend should send
the message that we can have a groundswell, but we need to build
institutional power to accomplish what the groundswell is demanding.”

Johnson also echoed a common theme that this would be good for the party as
a whole. “Unless Hillary is an idiot — and she isn’t — she would want to
help make this happen for a number of reasons,” he said, ticking them off
quickly:

First, a primary gets people interested much earlier. Second, it gives her
every opportunity to mend fences with progressives by embracing Sanders,
and spelling out good reasons when she does differ. Third, it helps her get
into campaign mode, sharpen her message and speech and gets the organizing
started way ahead of September 2016.  And fourth, it helps her if we start
the process of building an independent institutional power base, exactly as
it would have helped Obama get done the progressive things he actually
wanted to get done — but his people would not use that list, insisted on
defunding independent organizations, etc.

This last point is a particularly interesting one. It’s always taken for
granted that independent political power on the left is bad news for
Democrats — though sometimes it’s admitted there can be an upside as well.
On the right, it’s the reverse: independent power there is assumed to be
indispensable — not just good — for Republicans, though sometimes there’s a
discussion of whether just maybe there’s a downside. (War on women? What
war on women?)

Steve Cobble, who was the national delegate coordinator on the Jackson ’88
presidential campaign, had the most thought-out list of specifics to offer.
Cobble works with Progressive Democrats of America, who have launched a
“Draft Bernie” effort, so perhaps that’s not surprising.  But what might be
somewhat surprising is that Cobble isn’t quite as tightly focused on core
middle-class economic issues — though to some extent that’s more a matter
of framing. “The campaign needs to run on the issues of the future — if our
democracy is to have one — on climate change, on inequality, on peace, on
challenging corporate ‘rights’ and Citizens United and big-money domination
of our politics,” Cobble said, for starters.  “Local activists on those
issues can use the campaign to build their supporter lists, start or
strengthen local chapters, strengthen the climate change coalition, carry
the Citizens United constitutional amendment case into more states and
localities, and use the campaign to find more ways to agitate against the 1
percent.”

Focusing specifically on the subject of message, Cobble said, “The campaign
needs to begin to develop an updated ‘progressive message’ for reformers to
coalesce around, something along the lines of Naomi Klein’s new book, ‘This
Changes Everything‘ — a big message, a future message, a hopeful outcome
possible, a big fight with big stakes. This opens up space for local
organizing.”

This led directly to the subject of candidate/grassroots activists
interactions. Naturally, you want to register everyone to vote, “especially
the young,” Cobble noted. “Jackson carried the young in the 1988 primaries,
and the several million new voters he helped register in his campaigns were
still voting 20 years later, when Obama won.”  But first, you have to
create connections with people.

*Washington Post: “Téa Leoni knows what you’re thinking when you see her on
‘Madam Secretary’”
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/tv/tea-leoni-knows-what-youre-thinking-when-you-see-her-on-madam-secretary/2014/10/03/9fa2570c-4a4d-11e4-b72e-d60a9229cc10_story.html>*

By Emily Yahr

October 3, 2014, 7:36 p.m. EDT

Téa Leoni stars on the new CBS drama “Madam Secretary” as a secretary of
state. It’s an intense role in which her character deals with complex
international relations. This character also has blond hair and wears the
occasional pantsuit. Want to guess the only thing people tend to ask her
about?

If you assumed “Hillary Rodham Clinton,” well, welcome to Leoni’s world as
the star of one of the most anticipated shows of the fall television
season, in which Leoni dominates the screen as newly appointed Secretary of
State Elizabeth McCord, a brilliant former CIA officer plucked from
obscurity for the job. During a five-minute break on set on a September
morning, Leoni settles into a small, uncomfortable sofa in an area
decorated to look like the nicest floor of the State Department.

The other day, someone asked her which politician inspired her in the role.
No need to be coy. She knew what the person meant.

“They were sniffing out Hillary. That always seems to be the direction of
the interrogations,” Leoni says dryly. She pauses. “I have that word on the
brain because I’m going to interrogate somebody at 3 o’clock.” She pauses
again to clarify: “On the show.”

Leoni and the executive producers insist that the character is not based on
Clinton, who served in the position from 2009 to 2013. Still, it doesn’t
really matter. The talking point has been established.

Really, any talking points can help the show. Because once the dust settles
from the intriguing concept and first two episodes (which averaged a
healthy 14 million viewers), this show’s particular political setting is
one of the biggest challenges for the “Madam Secretary” producers.
“Secretary of state” is a job that people know exists, but few understand
the depths and details of it. How do you make a series about the State
Department appeal to an audience beyond Washington’s insiders?

***

While, again, the show is not about Hillary Clinton, executive producer
Lori McCreary explained that watching the Benghazi hearings sparked the
idea for the series. She kept thinking about the human element behind it
all. Was the government compelled to cover up something to protect people
from things they shouldn’t know about and keep them safe? To prevent more
problems?

“I just started thinking it would be a really interesting world to dive
into,” McCreary said, sitting in a quiet room a floor above the set.
“Instead of seeing what we see in the news on these international crises,
maybe what we can do is peel back the curtain on the State Department and
see what’s really going on.”

At the time, McCreary and longtime producing partner Morgan Freeman were
looking to develop a TV series. Once they decided on this idea (Freeman
came up with the title), they got together with creator-writer Barbara Hall
(“Joan of Arcadia,” “Homeland”) and director David Semel.

The underlying themes are ultimately about people and psychology, McCreary
said. If you look beyond the gritty details of foreign affairs, diplomacy
is simply asking: “How do you bridge a gap between our way of thinking and
someone else’s way of thinking?”

McCreary is hoping viewers can relate, even if their work lives are far
removed from brokering a deal to rescue two American teens imprisoned in
Syria or plotting strategy for a visit from a leader of an African country.
“As for the State Department, if you’ve experienced an office at all, it
will feel very similar,” said McCreary, who wants the series to have an
optimistic “West Wing” vibe about what government could be. “Because it’s
all office politics: Someone wants your job, somebody’s vying for this or
that, someone’s looking to date someone else. It’s all very familiar.”

The plan is to split the show into three major story lines each week, Hall
said: one about an international incident; another about the State
Department office; and then Elizabeth’s life at home with her husband and
children.

Hall and McCreary both talk about staying far away from the current working
mom trope on TV, where many women are amazing at their jobs and disastrous
at everything else. Particularly of interest is the relationship between
Elizabeth and her husband, Henry (Tim Daly), which — difficult to imagine
in a TV marriage — is very strong.

“Right now, the idea of trying to depict a functioning marriage is a
challenge, and it’s a refreshing point of view,” Hall said. “The idea is
not to present a perfect marriage; the idea is to present a marriage that
works.”

It will continue to evolve as Elizabeth’s job gets tougher. The balance
runs parallel to Leoni’s real life. Leoni hasn’t been on TV since the late
1990s with “The Naked Truth”; but when she read the “Madam Secretary” pilot
script, she knew almost instantly she wanted to sign on.

“It was delicious and perfect. Now I’ve decided to make a bigger
commitment. . . . I’ve made a great career out of being number two to some
very interesting, strong, hilarious men,” Leoni said of her previous films,
including “Spanglish” and “The Family Man.” “So this is a change. And the
hours are significantly more hellacious.”

***

Indeed, long hours are a requirement on the set that doubles for the
District, actually tucked away in Brooklyn. (“The Good Wife,” CBS’s
Sunday night
companion show, films a few blocks away.) On a recent weekday, the “Madam
Secretary” team is a well-oiled machine while shooting the eighth episode.

One big scene: Elizabeth and her team, including speechwriter Matt
(Geoffrey Arend) and press coordinator Daisy (Patina Miller), debate what
to do when a foreign leader accused of war crimes starts tweeting sexist
comments about the secretary of state. (Sample tweet: “She calls me a
criminal but it’s a crime to hide those gorgeous legs #wearaminiskirt.”)

The cast keeps things light between the many, many takes. Some wear
slippers (hidden under the table) with their business attire and State
Department badges. Later, Elizabeth and her chief of staff, Nadine (Bebe
Neuwirth), will rehearse an urgent walk-and-talk scene, reminiscent of
“West Wing”-type conversations.

When one take is over, Leoni, full of energy, slips out of heels and into
flats and someone hands her a bottle of water. An assistant offers to bring
food, and Leoni embarks on a monologue about the amazing food served on
set. “They make a chickpea salad that’s out of control,” she raves.

Less than a minute after she sits down, talking about how much she enjoys
playing the character, a production assistant apologetically says she’s
immediately needed again on set.

“Seriously?” she asks without standing up. “Okay, on ‘rolling,’ I’ll fly
in,” she tells him. The nervous assistant walks away to inform the crew
that Leoni is not ready yet.

“Watch this; this is where the panic starts,” she jokes in a whisper. “It’s
kind of fun, ’cause he’s new. You’ve got to kind of break them in. It’s
like hazing.”

But Leoni has more work to do, so she stands and starts walking to her
mark, still talking. She explains that while she understands the Clinton
comparisons, she hopes people can still separate the two.

“I guess there has to be that, because she’s a really smart, really
charming, really dynamic woman. What we didn’t see was her life,” Leoni
says. “There’s so many reasons that we’re not the same. But if there was a
woman I could say I wanted to see at home pouring cereal, it would be her,
you know? So instead, you’re just going to see Elizabeth.”

“Madam Secretary” (one hour) airs Sunday at 8:30 p.m. on CBS.

*Calendar:*

*Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official
schedule.*

·  October 6 – Ottawa, Canada: Sec. Clinton speaks at Canada 2020 event (Ottawa
Citizen
<http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/hillary-clinton-speaking-in-ottawa-oct-6>
)

·  October 8 – Chicago, IL: Sec. Clinton stumps for Illinois Gov.
Quinn (Chicago
Sun-Times
<http://politics.suntimes.com/article/washington/hillary-clinton-hitting-illinois-stump-gov-quinn/mon-09292014-1000am>
)

·  October 8 – Chicago, IL: Sec. Clinton keynotes AdvaMed 2014 conference (
AdvaMed
<http://advamed2014.com/download/files/AVM14%20Wednesday%20Plenary%20Media%20Alert%20FINAL%209_30_14(1).pdf>
)

·  October 9 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton fundraises for Arkansas Sen.
Pryor (AP
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/03fe478acd0344bab983323d3fb353e2/clinton-planning-lengthy-campaign-push-month>
)

·  October 9 – Philadelphia, PA: Sec. Clinton fundraises for gubernatorial
candidate Tom Wolf (AP
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/03fe478acd0344bab983323d3fb353e2/clinton-planning-lengthy-campaign-push-month>
)

·  October 13 – Las Vegas, NV: Sec. Clinton and Sen. Reid fundraise for the
Reid Nevada Fund (Ralston Reports
<http://www.ralstonreports.com/blog/hillary-raise-money-state-democrats-reid-next-month>
)

·  October 13 – Las Vegas, NV: Sec. Clinton keynotes the UNLV Foundation
Annual Dinner (UNLV
<http://www.unlv.edu/event/unlv-foundation-annual-dinner?delta=0>)

·  October 14 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton keynotes
salesforce.com Dreamforce
conference (salesforce.com
<http://www.salesforce.com/dreamforce/DF14/highlights.jsp#tuesday>)

·  October 20 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton fundraises for House
Democratic women candidates with Nancy Pelosi (Politico
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/hillary-clinton-nancy-pelosi-110387.html?hp=r7>
)

·  October 20 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton fundraises for Senate
Democrats (AP
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/03fe478acd0344bab983323d3fb353e2/clinton-planning-lengthy-campaign-push-month>
)

·  November 2  – NH: Sec. Clinton appears at a GOTV rally for Gov. Hassan
and Sen. Shaheen (AP
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/03fe478acd0344bab983323d3fb353e2/clinton-planning-lengthy-campaign-push-month>
)

·  December 1 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton keynotes a League of
Conservation Voters dinner (Politico
<http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hillary-clinton-green-groups-las-vegas-111430.html?hp=l11>
)

·  December 4 – Boston, MA: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Massachusetts
Conference for Women (MCFW <http://www.maconferenceforwomen.org/speakers/>)